Empowering the Presidency: Interests and Perceptions in Indonesia’S Constitutional Reforms, 1999-2002

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Empowering the Presidency: Interests and Perceptions in Indonesia’S Constitutional Reforms, 1999-2002 EMPOWERING THE PRESIDENCY: INTERESTS AND PERCEPTIONS IN INDONESIA’S CONSTITUTIONAL REFORMS, 1999-2002 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Blair Andrew King, B.A., M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2004 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor R. William Liddle, Adviser Professor Richard Gunther ____________________________ Adviser Professor Timothy Frye Political Science Graduate Program ABSTRACT The choice of political institutions is a critical aspect of a democratic transition. Significant amendments to the 1945 Constitution have transformed it into a more democratic framework with extensive separation of powers and checks and balances. Despite the introduction of the “difficult combination” of pure presidentialism and multipartism to Indonesia, consensual patterns of elite behavior should contribute to the further consolidation of democracy. This study examines the impact of the first four amendments on executive- legislative relations and presidential power. The use of the 1945 Constitution by two authoritarian regimes for four decades gave rise to the perception that it inevitably created a dominant presidency. Thus Indonesian political elites set out in 1999 to curtail presidential power. Paradoxically, by the end of the process three years later they created a comparatively very powerful president, primarily due to the introduction of direct election and the narrowing of the grounds for impeachment. In addition, although the president’s residual powers have been restricted, only slight reductions were made in her specific powers. This study utilizes concepts from political economy and political psychology to analyze the struggle between two broad camps in the constituent assembly (MPR): conservatives, led by Megawati Soekarnoputri and her Indonesian Democracy ii Party-Struggle (PDI-P) and progressives from most of the other major political parties. The progressives consistently supported direct election, even though this did not fit with their self-interest. Their position is explained by their perceptions of Indonesia’s history: in their view, the parliamentary system was the primary cause of political instability in the 1950s, and thus they concluded that pure presidentialism was more appropriate for Indonesia. Following the presidential crisis of 2001, Megawati and PDI-P reversed their initial position in opposition to direct election, as a means to strengthen the presidency and abolish the constitutional supremacy of the MPR. This reversal is explained by the “electoral bargaining approach,” a theory of institutional choice developed based on cases in Eastern Europe, the former Soviet Union and Latin America. This approach examines the interests of competing political forces rooted in their bargaining power and varying degrees of uncertainty over political outcomes. * * * * * iii Dedicated to my family and to all those working for democracy in Indonesia iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work is the culmination of many years of study and research. No project of this magnitude comes to fruition without the help of others. I would like to begin by recognizing the courage of the Indonesian university students who decided in 1998 that enough was enough and took to the streets across the country to bring about an end to President Soeharto’s authoritarian New Order. The professors and university administrators who quietly supported their demonstrations from behind the scenes should be commended as well. Without their efforts, the transition to democracy would not have taken place when it did and I would have written a very different dissertation. I would also like to express my gratitude to my Indonesian sources, especially MPR members, who have shared their perspectives with me over the past several years. The year I spent in Yogyakarta in 1998 conducting field research was supported by a Fulbright-Hays Doctoral Dissertation Research Abroad grant. I would like to thank the U.S. Department of Education for the financial support, and Gadjah Mada University and Professor Mohtar Mas’oed for the institutional and intellectual support, that allowed me to return to Indonesia just in time to witness history in the making. I then had the privilege to work at the Indonesia field office of the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs (NDI) for two years, which allowed me to observe the transition as it continued to unfold. Among the many colleagues I had the pleasure to work with at v NDI in Indonesia, Tursiana Setyohapsari and Miranti Maruto provided invaluable assistance and friendship, and Eric Bjornlund, Andrew Ellis and Sherrie Wolff were tireless intellectual soulmates and sources of frequent moral support. Since I returned to NDI in the Washington office, Peter Manikas has generously offered much-needed encouragement as well as the time off necessary to finish. I have also had the distinct pleasure of being a graduate student in a very nurturing intellectual environment, the political science department at Ohio State University. I have learned a great deal from my fellow students, of whom there are too many to name individually. Kathleen Woodward and Allyson Lowe, however, deserve special mention for their role as “comrades in arms” as we struggled together to finish our dissertations. Professors Dick Gunther and Tim Frye, and Kevin O’Brien before them, have offered many insightful comments and frequent words of encouragement over the years. I am much the richer for their intellectual and personal friendship. Bill Liddle has been much more than a dissertation adviser. He has also been a mentor, intellectual sparring partner, and friend. I have learned a great deal from him about Indonesia, about politics and about life. In addition, the group of (mostly) Indonesian students – both previous generations and my contemporaries – that Bill has mentored at OSU has been a great source of insight and companionship. In addition to those already mentioned above, Salim Said, Afan Gaffar, Bahtiar Effendy, Rizal Mallarangeng, Takeshi Kohno, Denny J. Aly and Saiful Mujani deserve special mention in this regard. I owe a special debt of gratitude to my wife Erlis, to my parents Ken and Joan, and to my brother Ken, who have suffered in silence (mostly) while I have labored to vi finish. Their love and support has sustained me through the valleys of despair and self- doubt. Finally, my two sons, Austin and Carter, have – on a daily basis – unwittingly helped me keep this project in perspective. I love them dearly for failing to understand the importance of Daddy staying in the office for one more hour. Guess what, boys, I’m done! * * * * * vii VITA December 1, 1966 . Born – Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1989 . .B.A. with Honors, International Relations, Stanford University M.A., International Policy Studies, Stanford University 1993-1994 . .University Fellowship, The Ohio State University 1997-1998 . .Fulbright-Hays Doctoral Dissertation Research Abroad Grant 2001-2002 . .Presidential Fellowship, The Ohio State University 1994-1997, 2002 . .Graduate Teaching and Research Associate, The Ohio State University PUBLICATIONS 1. Blair A. King, “The 1992 General Election and Indonesia’s Political Landscape,” Contemporary Southeast Asia 14: 2 (September 1992), 154-173. 2. Blair A. King, “Constitutional Tinkering: The Search for Consensus is Taking Time,” Inside Indonesia 65 (January – March 2001), 25-26. FIELDS OF STUDY Major Field: Political Science Comparative Politics International Relations viii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………ii Dedication…………...……………………………………………………………………iv Acknowledgments…………………………………………………………………………v Vita…………...…………………………………………………………………………viii List of Tables……...………………………………………………………………...……xi Chapters: Introduction: Constitutional Reform and the Democratic Transition in Indonesia……….1 1. Theories of Presidential Power and Institutional Choice………….……………..24 2. Constitutional Development in Indonesia, 1945-2002……………………….….52 3. Self-Interest and Institutional Choice……………………………………………92 4. Perceived Lessons of History…………………………………….……………..134 Conclusion: Constitutional Reform and the Prospects for Democratic Consolidation in Indonesia……………………………………………………………………..163 Appendix A: The Original 1945 Constitution, Including Official Annotations………..185 Appendix B: The Amended 1945 Constitution (Integrated Text, Through the Fourth Amendment)…………………………………………………………….206 Appendix C: Scoring the Indonesian Presidency on the Shugart-Carey and Frye-Hellman Scales…………………………………...……………………….230 Appendix D: Residual Powers of the Indonesian Presidency…………………………..236 Appendix E: MPR Blocs………………………………………………………………..240 Appendix F: Interviews…………………………………………………………………243 ix Bibliography……………………………………………………………………...…….247 * * * * * x LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1.1 Summary of hypotheses, electoral bargaining approach (reproduced from Frye 1997, 534 [Table 1])………………………….………………46 2.1 Specific powers, Indonesian presidency, 1999-2002, Shugart-Carey scale.…….64 2.2 Specific powers, Indonesian presidency, 1999-2002, Frye-Hellman scale….…..65 2.3 Presidential power in Indonesia, compared to cases in Shugart and Carey 1992, 155 (Table 8.2), arranged from most to least powerful………...…67 2.4 Presidential power in Indonesia, compared to cases in Frye 1997, 547 (Appendix A), arranged from most to least powerful……………………69 xi INTRODUCTION CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM AND THE DEMOCRATIC TRANSITION IN INDONESIA
Recommended publications
  • His Excellency Mr. Joko Widodo, President of Indonesia
    REMARKS PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA H.E. JOKO WIDODO AT 77TH SESSION OF THE UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMISSION FOR ASIA AND THE PACIFIC (UNESCAP) MONDAY, 26 APRIL 2021 Page 1 of 4 Executive Secretary of the UNESCAP, Armida Alisjahbana, and all Delegates, 1. The COVID-19 Pandemic has shown us ➔ of the weakness of health infrastructures at the national, regional, and global levels. ➔ And how fragile our economy is from external shocks. 2. Therefore together, we must reflect upon ourselves and correct our course. 3. The Asia and Pacific region must soon come out from the pandemic and become stronger. 4. Recover together…recover stronger. 5. Allow me to share some thoughts. 6. First… we must expand investment in strengthening regional health resilience. 7. The region’s health expenditures are still low. ➔ In South Asia, for instance, at only 3.48% of the GDP, while East Asia and the Pacific at 6.67%. ➔ Compared to in Latin America 7.96%, in the European Union 9.85%, and in the United States 16.89%. 8. This needs to be corrected. 9. UNESCAP must become the catalyst in strengthening the region’s health infrastructure, through … ➔ Enhancing the quality of health personnel Page 2 of 4 ➔ Collaborating in health, pharmaceutical, vaccines, and medical raw materials industries … and ➔ research and technology in the health sector 10. The capacity for pandemic early warning in the region must also be strengthened. 11. Second… we have to adapt towards economic recovery 12. Investment on digital-based economy must be scaled up. 13. Innovation to support safe tourism must be undertaken.
    [Show full text]
  • Indonesia Beyond Reformasi: Necessity and the “De-Centering” of Democracy
    INDONESIA BEYOND REFORMASI: NECESSITY AND THE “DE-CENTERING” OF DEMOCRACY Leonard C. Sebastian, Jonathan Chen and Adhi Priamarizki* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION: TRANSITIONAL POLITICS IN INDONESIA ......................................... 2 R II. NECESSITY MAKES STRANGE BEDFELLOWS: THE GLOBAL AND DOMESTIC CONTEXT FOR DEMOCRACY IN INDONESIA .................... 7 R III. NECESSITY-BASED REFORMS ................... 12 R A. What Necessity Inevitably Entailed: Changes to Defining Features of the New Order ............. 12 R 1. Military Reform: From Dual Function (Dwifungsi) to NKRI ......................... 13 R 2. Taming Golkar: From Hegemony to Political Party .......................................... 21 R 3. Decentralizing the Executive and Devolution to the Regions................................. 26 R 4. Necessary Changes and Beyond: A Reflection .31 R IV. NON NECESSITY-BASED REFORMS ............. 32 R A. After Necessity: A Political Tug of War........... 32 R 1. The Evolution of Legislative Elections ........ 33 R 2. The Introduction of Direct Presidential Elections ...................................... 44 R a. The 2004 Direct Presidential Elections . 47 R b. The 2009 Direct Presidential Elections . 48 R 3. The Emergence of Direct Local Elections ..... 50 R V. 2014: A WATERSHED ............................... 55 R * Leonard C. Sebastian is Associate Professor and Coordinator, Indonesia Pro- gramme at the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies, S. Rajaratnam School of In- ternational Studies, Nanyang Technological University,
    [Show full text]
  • Surrealist Painting in Yogyakarta Martinus Dwi Marianto University of Wollongong
    University of Wollongong Research Online University of Wollongong Thesis Collection University of Wollongong Thesis Collections 1995 Surrealist painting in Yogyakarta Martinus Dwi Marianto University of Wollongong Recommended Citation Marianto, Martinus Dwi, Surrealist painting in Yogyakarta, Doctor of Philosophy thesis, Faculty of Creative Arts, University of Wollongong, 1995. http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/1757 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] SURREALIST PAINTING IN YOGYAKARTA A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY from UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG by MARTINUS DWI MARIANTO B.F.A (STSRI 'ASRT, Yogyakarta) M.F.A. (Rhode Island School of Design, USA) FACULTY OF CREATIVE ARTS 1995 CERTIFICATION I certify that this work has not been submitted for a degree to any other university or institution and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by any other person, except where due reference has been made in the text. Martinus Dwi Marianto July 1995 ABSTRACT Surrealist painting flourished in Yogyakarta around the middle of the 1980s to early 1990s. It became popular amongst art students in Yogyakarta, and formed a significant style of painting which generally is characterised by the use of casual juxtapositions of disparate ideas and subjects resulting in absurd, startling, and sometimes disturbing images. In this thesis, Yogyakartan Surrealism is seen as the expression in painting of various social, cultural, and economic developments taking place rapidly and simultaneously in Yogyakarta's urban landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Thee Kian Wie's Major
    Economics and Finance in Indonesia Vol. 61 No. 1, 2015 : 41-52 p-ISSN 0126-155X; e-ISSN 2442-9260 41 The Indonesian Economy from the Colonial Extraction Period until the Post-New Order Period: A Review of Thee Kian Wie’s Major Works Maria Monica Wihardjaa,∗, Siwage Dharma Negarab,∗∗ aWorld Bank Office Jakarta bIndonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI) Abstract This paper reviews some major works of Thee Kian Wie, one of Indonesia’s most distinguished economic historians, that spans from the Colonial period until the post-New Order period. His works emphasize that economic history can guide future economic policy. Current problems in Indonesia were resulted from past policy failures. Indonesia needs to consistently embark on open economic policies, free itself from "colonial period mentality". Investment should be made in rebuilding crumbling infrastructure, improving the quality of health and education services, and addressing poor law enforcement. If current corruption persists, Indone- sia could not hope to become a dynamic and prosperous country. Keywords: Economic History; Colonial Period; Industrialization; Thee Kian Wie Abstrak Tulisan ini menelaah beberapakarya besar Thee Kian Wie, salah satu sejarawan ekonomi paling terhormat di Indonesia, mulai dari periode penjajahan hingga periode pasca-Orde Baru. Karya Beliau menekankan bahwa sejarah ekonomi dapat memberikan arahan dalam perumusan kebijakan ekonomi mendatang. Permasalahan yang dihadapi Indonesia dewasa ini merupakan akibat kegagalan kebijakan masa lalu. In- donesia perlu secara konsisten menerapkan kebijakan ekonomi terbuka, membebaskan diri dari "mentalitas periode penjajahan". Investasi perlu ditingkatkan untuk pembangunan kembali infrastruktur, peningkatan kualitas layanan kesehatan dan pendidikan, serta pembenahan penegakan hukum. Jika korupsi saat ini berlanjut, Indonesia tidak dapat berharap untuk menjadi negara yang dinamis dan sejahtera.
    [Show full text]
  • Macro Report Version 2002-10-23
    Prepared by: Institute of Social and Political Opinion Research (ISPO), KULeuven, Belgium Date: 15/01/2005 Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 2: Macro Report Version 2002-10-23 Country (Date of Election): Belgium 13 June 2003 NOTE TO THE COLLABORATORS: The information provided in this report contributes to an important part of the CSES project- your efforts in providing these data are greatly appreciated! Any supplementary documents that you can provide (i.e. electoral legislation, party manifestos, electoral commission reports, media reports) are also appreciated, and will be made available with this report to the CSES community on the CSES web page. Part I: Data Pertinent to the Election at which the Module was Administered 1. Report the number of portfolios (cabinet posts) held by each party in cabinet, prior to the most recent election. (If one party holds all cabinet posts, simply write "all".) Name of Political Party Number of Portfolios VLD 4 SP.a 3 Agalev 2 PS 3 MR 3 Ecolo 2 1a. What was the size of the cabinet before the election?………17…………………………… 2. Report the number of portfolios (cabinet posts) held by each party in cabinet, after the most recent election. (If one party holds all cabinet posts, simply write "all"). Name of Political Party Number of Portfolios VLD 5 SP.a 5 Spirit 1 PS 5 MR 4 FDF 1 2a. What was the size of the cabinet after the election? ……20……………………………… 2Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 2: Macro Report 3. Political Parties (most active during the election in which the module was administered and receiving at least 3% of the vote): Party Name/Label Year Party Ideological European Parliament International Party Founded Family Political Group Organizational Memberships (where applicable) A.
    [Show full text]
  • Vice President's Power and Role in Indonesian Government Post Amendment 1945 Constitution
    Al WASATH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Volume 1 No. 2 Oktober 2020: 61-78 VICE PRESIDENT'S POWER AND ROLE IN INDONESIAN GOVERNMENT POST AMENDMENT 1945 CONSTITUTION Roziqin Guanghua Law School, Zhejiang University, China Email: [email protected] Abstract Politicians are fighting over the position of Vice President. However, after becoming Vice President, they could not be active. The Vice President's role is only as a spare tire. Usually, he would only perform ceremonial acts. The exception was different when the Vice President was Mohammad Hata and Muhammad Jusuf Kalla. Therefore, this paper will question: What is the position of the President in the constitutional system? What is the position of the Vice President of Indonesia after the amendment of the 1945 Constitution? Furthermore, how is the role sharing between the President and Vice President of Indonesia? This research uses the library research method, using secondary data. This study uses qualitative data analysis methods in a prescriptive-analytical form. From the research, the writer found that the President is assisted by the Vice President and ministers in carrying out his duties. The President and the Vice President work in a team of a presidential institution. From time to time, the Indonesian Vice President's position has always been the same to assist the President. The Vice President will replace the President if the President is permanently unavailable or temporarily absent. With the Vice President's position who is directly elected by the people in a pair with the President, he/she is a partner, not subordinate to the President.
    [Show full text]
  • Gerrymandering Becomes a Problem
    VOLUME TWENTY FOUR • NUMBER TWO WINTER 2020 THE SPECIAL ELECTION EDITION A LEGAL NEWSPAPER FOR KIDS Gerrymandering Becomes a Problem Battling Over for the States to Resolve How to Elect by Phyllis Raybin Emert a President by Michael Barbella Gerrymandering on a partisan basis is not new to politics. The term gerrymander dates back to the 1800s when it was used to mock The debate on how the President Massachusetts Governor Elbridge Gerry, who manipulated congressional of the United States should be elected lines in the state until the map of one district looked like a salamander. is almost as old as the country itself. Redistricting, which is the redrawing of district maps, happens every Contrary to popular belief, voters 10 years after the U.S. Census takes place. Whatever political party is do not elect the president and vice in power at that time has the advantage since, in most states, they president directly; instead, they choose are in charge of drawing the maps. electors to form an Electoral College “Partisan gerrymandering refers to the practice of politicians where the official vote is cast. drawing voting districts for their own political advantage,” During the Constitutional Convention says Eugene D. Mazo, a professor at Rutgers Law School and of 1787, a an expert on election law and the voting process. few ways to Professor Mazo explains that politicians, with the use of advanced computer elect the chief technology, use methods of “packing” and “cracking” to move voters around to executive were different state districts, giving the edge to one political party.
    [Show full text]
  • President, Prime Minister, Or Constitutional Monarch?
    I McN A I R PAPERS NUMBER THREE PRESIDENT, PRIME MINISTER, OR CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCH? By EUGENE V. ROSTOW THE INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL S~RATEGIC STUDIES I~j~l~ ~p~ 1~ ~ ~r~J~r~l~j~E~J~p~j~r~lI~1~1~L~J~~~I~I~r~ ~'l ' ~ • ~i~i ~ ,, ~ ~!~ ,,~ i~ ~ ~~ ~~ • ~ I~ ~ ~ ~i! ~H~I~II ~ ~i~ ,~ ~II~b ~ii~!i ~k~ili~Ii• i~i~II~! I ~I~I I• I~ii kl .i-I k~l ~I~ ~iI~~f ~ ~ i~I II ~ ~I ~ii~I~II ~!~•b ~ I~ ~i' iI kri ~! I ~ • r rl If r • ~I • ILL~ ~ r I ~ ~ ~Iirr~11 ¸I~' I • I i I ~ ~ ~,i~i~I•~ ~r~!i~il ~Ip ~! ~ili!~Ii!~ ~i ~I ~iI•• ~ ~ ~i ~I ~•i~,~I~I Ill~EI~ ~ • ~I ~I~ I¸ ~p ~~ ~I~i~ PRESIDENT, PRIME MINISTER, OR CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCH.'? PRESIDENT, PRIME MINISTER, OR CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCH? By EUGENE V. ROSTOW I Introduction N THE MAKING and conduct of foreign policy, ~ Congress and the President have been rivalrous part- ners for two hundred years. It is not hyperbole to call the current round of that relationship a crisis--the most serious constitutional crisis since President Franklin D. Roosevelt tried to pack the Supreme Court in 1937. Roosevelt's court-packing initiative was highly visible and the reaction to it violent and widespread. It came to an abrupt and dramatic end, some said as the result of Divine intervention, when Senator Joseph T. Robinson, the Senate Majority leader, dropped dead on the floor of the Senate while defending the President's bill.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Popular Vote Plan and Direct Election of the President: an FAQ What Is the National Popular Vote Plan? the National
    The National Popular Vote Plan and Direct Election of the President: An FAQ What is the National Popular Vote plan? The National Popular Vote plan (NPV) is a statute that, as of April 2009, had been introduced by state legislators in 48 states and publicly committed to be introduced in the remaining two states. NPV seeks to guarantee election of the presidential candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. It creates an agreement among states to award all of their electoral votes collectively to the presidential candidate winning the national popular vote once the number of participating states together have a majority (currently 270 of 538) of electoral votes. In considering the NPV bill, the choice for legislators is straightforward: passing NPV will guarantee election of the national popular vote winner once joined by enough participating states to make it decisive for determining future elections. Until that point, a state’s current rules will apply. The NPV plan is founded on two state powers clearly established in the U.S. Constitution: a state’s plenary power to decide how to apportion its electoral votes and a state’s power to enter into binding interstate compacts. As of April 2009, New Jersey, Hawaii, Maryland, and Illinois – which together possess a fifth of the total electoral votes necessary to trigger the agreement – have enacted the NPV compact. It has been adopted by a total of 26 state legislative chambers in 16 states, earning public support from nearly 1,300 legislators and national luminaries like the editorial boards of the New York Times and Los Angeles Times and former U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • ALBERTA SECURITIES COMMISSION DECISION Citation
    ALBERTA SECURITIES COMMISSION DECISION Citation: Re Global 8 Environmental Technologies, Inc., 2015 ABASC 734 Date: 20150605 Global 8 Environmental Technologies, Inc., Halo Property Services Inc., Canadian Alternative Resources Inc., Milverton Capital Corporation, Rene Joseph Branconnier and Chad Delbert Burback Panel: Kenneth Potter, QC Fred Snell, FCA Appearing: Robert Stack, Liam Oddie and Heather Currie for Commission Staff H. Roderick Anderson for René Joseph Branconnier Patricia Taylor for Chad Delbert Burback Daniel Wolf for Global 8 Environmental Technologies, Inc. Submissions Completed: 26 November 2014 Decision: 5 June 2015 5176439.1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. OVERVIEW ....................................................................................................................... 1 A. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 1. G8 .................................................................................................................1 2. Halo and CAR ..............................................................................................2 B. History of the Proceedings ...................................................................................... 2 C. Certain Prior Orders ................................................................................................ 3 D. Summary of Conclusion ......................................................................................... 3 II. PROCEDURAL AND EVIDENTIARY MATTERS
    [Show full text]
  • Sudargo Gautama and the Development of Indonesian Public Order: a Study on the Application of Public Order Doctrine in a Pluralistic Legal System
    Sudargo Gautama and the Development of Indonesian Public Order: A Study on the Application of Public Order Doctrine in a Pluralistic Legal System Yu Un Oppusunggu A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2015 Reading Committee: John O. Haley, Chair Michael E. Townsend Beth E. Rivin Program Authorized to Offer Degree School of Law © Copyright 2015 Yu Un Oppusunggu ii University of Washington Abstract Sudargo Gautama and the Development of Indonesian Public Order: A Study on the Application of Public Order Doctrine in a Pluralistic Legal System Yu Un Oppusunggu Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor John O. Haley School of Law A sweeping proviso that protects basic or fundamental interests of a legal system is known in various names – ordre public, public policy, public order, government’s interest or Vorbehaltklausel. This study focuses on the concept of Indonesian public order in private international law. It argues that Indonesia has extraordinary layers of pluralism with respect to its people, statehood and law. Indonesian history is filled with the pursuit of nationhood while protecting diversity. The legal system has been the unifying instrument for the nation. However the selected cases on public order show that the legal system still lacks in coherence. Indonesian courts have treated public order argument inconsistently. A prima facie observation may find Indonesian public order unintelligible, and the courts have gained notoriety for it. This study proposes a different perspective. It sees public order in light of Indonesia’s legal pluralism and the stages of legal development.
    [Show full text]
  • DKI JAKARTA.Pdf
    DAFTAR JEMAAH BERHAK LUNAS TAHAP I TAHUN 1441H/2020M PROVINSI DKI JAKARTA BERHAK LUNAS TAHAP 1 KODE NO NO. PORSI NAMA ALAMAT KECAMATAN EMBARKASI 1 0900024005 NY HAERIYAH JL KIRAI NO.43B RT.06/01 KEBAYORAN BARU JKG 2 0900088988 HENI AMALIA LORONG 101 TIMUR NO. 66 RT 05/02 KOJA JKG 3 0900095483 LUSIA ISTHIATI SUPENI JL.MARUNDA BARU RT.003/03 CILINCING JKG 4 0900101689 EVA FARAH DIBA JL.CIP.JAYA AA/33A RT.009/008 JATINEGARA JKG 5 0900102137 AMINA KP.BARU RT.001/009 CAKUNG JKG 6 0900102532 HJ BARKAH PONDOK KELAPA RT.009/012 DUREN SAWIT JKG 7 0900102637 MARYATI JL.PEJUANG IV NO.36 RT.04/04 KELAPA GADING JKG 8 0900103256 SHOBAH NAWALIAH MENTENG DALAM RT.002/010 TEBET JKG 9 0900103666 SITI SAIDAH MENTENG DALAM RT.002/010 TEBET JKG 10 0900104448 PURWANTO JL.PERSAHABATAN RT.011/004 JAGAKARSA JKG 11 0900106046 AYU NURCAHYANI SETIA BUDI TIMUR RT.02 RW.01 SETIABUDI JKG 12 0900106750 KHUZAIBIYAH JL. LODAN RAYA VI RT.001/001 NO.14 PADEMANGAN JKG 13 0900107703 SUKINI KOMP KOSTRAD RT 11 RW 07 KEBAYORAN LAMA JKG 14 0900108788 CHUSNUL CHOTIMAH JL. JATI BARU III RT 005/004 TANAH ABANG JKG 15 0900108990 ROMELAH JL.BATU I GG.ARAB RT.014/005 PASAR MINGGU JKG 16 0900111076 SITI ROHANI JL.WULUH III NO.11 RT/RW.004/007 PALMERAH JKG 17 0900111109 RETNO KUSTIAH JL.KAYU MANIS V BARU RT.006/004 MATRAMAN JKG 18 0900111812 LILI NURWANTI JL. CIPINANG KEBEMBEM RT.010/010 PULOGADUNG JKG 19 0900111833 GATOT SUGITO JL.PINANG EMASX/UD.10 RT.010/003 KEBAYORAN LAMA JKG 20 0900113012 KASTOLANI KOMP.
    [Show full text]