Growing Wikipedia Across Languages Via Recommendation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Growing Wikipedia Across Languages Via Recommendation Growing Wikipedia Across Languages via Recommendation Ellery Wulczyn Robert West Leila Zia Jure Leskovec Wikimedia Foundation Stanford University Wikimedia Foundation Stanford University [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT editors to find articles missing in their language that they would The different Wikipedia language editions vary dramatically in how like to contribute to. One approach to helping editors in this pro- comprehensive they are. As a result, most language editions con- cess is to generate personalized recommendations for the creation tain only a small fraction of the sum of information that exists of important missing articles in their areas of interest. across all Wikipedias. In this paper, we present an approach to Although Wikipedia volunteers have sought to increase the con- filling gaps in article coverage across different Wikipedia editions. tent coverage in different languages, research on identifying miss- Our main contribution is an end-to-end system for recommending ing content and recommending such content to editors based on articles for creation that exist in one language but are missing in an- their interests is scarce. Wikipedia’s SuggestBot [6] is the only other. The system involves identifying missing articles, ranking the end-to-end system designed for task recommendations. However, missing articles according to their importance, and recommending SuggestBot focuses on recommending existing articles that require important missing articles to editors based on their interests. We improvement and does not consider the problem of recommending empirically validate our models in a controlled experiment involv- articles that do not yet exist. ing 12,000 French Wikipedia editors. We find that personalizing Here we introduce an empirically tested end-to-end system to recommendations increases editor engagement by a factor of two. bridge gaps in coverage across Wikipedia language editions. Our Moreover, recommending articles increases their chance of being system has several steps: First, we harness the Wikipedia knowl- created by a factor of 3.2. Finally, articles created as a result of our edge graph to identify articles that exist in a source language but not recommendations are of comparable quality to organically created in a target language. We then rank these missing articles by impor- articles. Overall, our system leads to more engaged editors and tance. We do so by accurately predicting the potential future page faster growth of Wikipedia with no effect on its quality. view count of the missing articles. Finally, we recommend missing articles to editors in the target language based on their interests. In particular, we find an optimal matching between editors and miss- 1. INTRODUCTION ing articles, ensuring that each article is recommended only once, General encyclopedias are collections of information from all that editors receive multiple recommendations to choose from, and branches of knowledge. Wikipedia is the most prominent online that articles are recommended to the the most interested editors. encyclopedia, providing content via free access. Although the web- We validated our system by conducting a randomized experi- site is available in 291 languages, the amount of content in different ment, in which we sent article creation recommendations to 12,000 languages differs significantly. While a dozen languages have more French Wikipedia editors. We find that our method of personaliz- than one million articles, more than 80% of Wikipedia language ing recommendations doubles the rate of editor engagement. More editions have fewer than one hundred thousand articles [24]. It is important, our recommendation system increased the baseline ar- fair to say that one of the most important challenges for Wikipedia ticle creation rate by a factor of 3.2. Also, articles created via our is increasing the coverage of content across different languages. recommendations are of comparable quality to organically created Overcoming this challenge is no simple task for Wikipedia vol- articles. We conclude that our system can lead to more engaged unteers. For many editors, it is difficult to find important miss- editors and faster growth of Wikipedia with no effect on its quality. ing articles, especially if they are newly registered and do not have The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In Sec. 2 we years of experience with creating Wikipedia content. Wikipedians present the system for identifying, ranking, and recommending miss- have made efforts to take stock of missing articles via collections ing articles to Wikipedia editors. In Sec. 3 we describe how we of “redlinks”1 or tools such as “Not in the other language” [15]. evaluate each of the three system components. In Sec. 4 we discuss Both technologies help editors find missing articles, but leave ed- the details of the large scale email experiment in French Wikipedia. itors with long, unranked lists of articles to choose from. Since We discuss some of the opportunities and challenges of this work editing Wikipedia is unpaid volunteer work, it should be easier for and some future directions in Sec. 5 and share some concluding remarks in Sec. 6. 1Redlinks are hyperlinks that link from an existing article to a non- existing article that should be created. 2. SYSTEM FOR RECOMMENDING MISS- Copyright is held by the International World Wide Web Conference Com- mittee (IW3C2). IW3C2 reserves the right to provide a hyperlink to the ING ARTICLES author’s site if the Material is used in electronic media. We assume we are given a language pair consisting of a source WWW 2016, April 11–15, 2016, Montréal, Québec, Canada. ACM 978-1-4503-4143-1/16/04. language S and a target language T. Our goal is to support the http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2872427.2883077. creation of important articles missing in T but existing in S. missing in German—something we want to avoid, since the topic Find Rank Match is already covered in the TUMOR article. missing articles by editors and In order to solve this problem, we need a way to partition the articles importance articles set of Wikidata concepts into groups of near-synonyms. Once we c Sec. 2.1 & 3.1 Sec. 2.2 & 3.2 Sec. 2.3 & 3.3 have such a partitioning, we may define a concept to be missing in language T if c’s group contains no article in T. In order to group Wikidata concepts that are semantically nearly Figure 1: System overview. Sec. 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 describe the com- identical, we leverage two signals. First, we extract inter-language ponents in detail; we evaluate them in Sec. 3.1, 3.2, 3.3. links which Wikipedia editors use to override the mapping speci- fied by Wikidata and to directly link articles across languages (e.g., in Fig. 2, English NEOPLASM is linked via an inter-language link Q133212 Q1216998 to German NEOPLASMA). We only consider inter-language links Wikidata added between S and T since using links from all languages has Wikipedia zh:肿瘤 de:Tumor en:Neoplasm et:Kasvaja been shown to lead to large clusters of non-synonymous concepts Redirect [3]. Second, we extract intra-language redirects. Editors have the fr:Tumeur fr:Néoplasie de:Neoplasma ability to create redirects pointing to other articles in the same language (e.g., as shown in Fig. 2, German Wikipedia contains a redirect from NEOPLASMA to TUMOR). We use these two addi- Figure 2: Language-independent Wikidata concepts (oval) tional types of links—inter-language links and redirects—to merge linking to language-specific Wikipedia articles (rectangular). the original concept clusters defined by Wikidata, as illustrated by Clusters are merged via redirects and inter-language links Fig. 2, where articles in the red and blue cluster are merged under hand-coded by Wikipedia editors. the same concept by virtue of these links. In a nutshell, we find missing articles by inspecting a graph whose nodes are language-independent Wikidata concepts and lan- Our system for addressing this task consists of three distinct guage-specific articles, and whose edges are Wikidata’s concept- stages (Fig. 1). First, we find articles missing from the target lan- to-article links together with the two additional kinds of link just guage but existing in the source language. Second, we rank the set described. Given this graph, we define that a concept c is miss- of articles missing in the target language by importance, by build- ing in language T if c’s weakly connected component contains no ing a machine-learned model that predicts the number of views an article in T. article would receive in the target language if it existed. Third, we match missing articles to well-suited editors to create those articles, 2.2 Ranking missing articles based on similarities between the content of the missing articles and of the articles previously edited by the editors. The steps are Not all missing articles should be created in all languages: some explained in more details in the following sections. may not be of encyclopedic value in the cultural context of the target language. In the most extreme case, such articles might be 2.1 Finding missing articles deleted shortly after being created. We do not want to encourage the creation of such articles, but instead want to focus on articles For any pair of languages (S;T), we want to find the set of arti- that would fill an important knowledge gap. cles in the source language S that have no corresponding article in A first idea would be to use the curated list of 10,000 articles ev- the target language T. We solve this task by leveraging the Wiki- ery Wikipedia should have [23]. This list provides a set of articles data knowledge base [20], which defines a mapping between lan- that are guaranteed to fill an important knowledge gap in any Wi- guage-independent concepts and language-specific Wikipedia arti- kipedia in which they are missing.
Recommended publications
  • Universality, Similarity, and Translation in the Wikipedia Inter-Language Link Network
    In Search of the Ur-Wikipedia: Universality, Similarity, and Translation in the Wikipedia Inter-language Link Network Morten Warncke-Wang1, Anuradha Uduwage1, Zhenhua Dong2, John Riedl1 1GroupLens Research Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering 2Dept. of Information Technical Science University of Minnesota Nankai University Minneapolis, Minnesota Tianjin, China {morten,uduwage,riedl}@cs.umn.edu [email protected] ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION Wikipedia has become one of the primary encyclopaedic in- The world: seven seas separating seven continents, seven formation repositories on the World Wide Web. It started billion people in 193 nations. The world's knowledge: 283 in 2001 with a single edition in the English language and has Wikipedias totalling more than 20 million articles. Some since expanded to more than 20 million articles in 283 lan- of the content that is contained within these Wikipedias is guages. Criss-crossing between the Wikipedias is an inter- probably shared between them; for instance it is likely that language link network, connecting the articles of one edition they will all have an article about Wikipedia itself. This of Wikipedia to another. We describe characteristics of ar- leads us to ask whether there exists some ur-Wikipedia, a ticles covered by nearly all Wikipedias and those covered by set of universal knowledge that any human encyclopaedia only a single language edition, we use the network to under- will contain, regardless of language, culture, etc? With such stand how we can judge the similarity between Wikipedias a large number of Wikipedia editions, what can we learn based on concept coverage, and we investigate the flow of about the knowledge in the ur-Wikipedia? translation between a selection of the larger Wikipedias.
    [Show full text]
  • Decentralization in Wikipedia Governance
    Decentralization in Wikipedia Governance Andrea Forte1, Vanessa Larco2 and Amy Bruckman1 1GVU Center, College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology {aforte, asb}@cc.gatech.edu 2Microsoft [email protected] This is a preprint version of the journal article: Forte, Andrea, Vanessa Larco and Amy Bruckman. (2009) Decentralization in Wikipedia Governance. Journal of Management Information Systems. 26(1) pp 49-72. Publisher: M.E. Sharp www.mesharpe.com/journals.asp Abstract How does “self-governance” happen in Wikipedia? Through in-depth interviews with twenty individuals who have held a variety of responsibilities in the English-language Wikipedia, we obtained rich descriptions of how various forces produce and regulate social structures on the site. Our analysis describes Wikipedia as an organization with highly refined policies, norms, and a technological architecture that supports organizational ideals of consensus building and discussion. We describe how governance on the site is becoming increasingly decentralized as the community grows and how this is predicted by theories of commons-based governance developed in offline contexts. We also briefly examine local governance structures called WikiProjects through the example of WikiProject Military History, one of the oldest and most prolific projects on the site. 1. The Mechanisms of Self-Organization Should a picture of a big, hairy tarantula appear in an encyclopedia article about arachnophobia? Does it illustrate the point, or just frighten potential readers? Reasonable people might disagree on this question. In a freely editable site like Wikipedia, anyone can add the photo, and someone else can remove it. And someone can add it back, and the process continues.
    [Show full text]
  • Position Description Addenda
    POSITION DESCRIPTION January 2014 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director - Addenda The Wikimedia Foundation is a radically transparent organization, and much information can be found at www.wikimediafoundation.org . That said, certain information might be particularly useful to nominators and prospective candidates, including: Announcements pertaining to the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Kicking off the search for our next Executive Director by Former Wikimedia Foundation Board Chair Kat Walsh An announcement from Wikimedia Foundation ED Sue Gardner by Wikimedia Executive Director Sue Gardner Video Interviews on the Wikimedia Community and Foundation and Its History Some of the values and experiences of the Wikimedia Community are best described directly by those who have been intimately involved in the organization’s dramatic expansion. The following interviews are available for viewing though mOppenheim.TV . • 2013 Interview with Former Wikimedia Board Chair Kat Walsh • 2013 Interview with Wikimedia Executive Director Sue Gardner • 2009 Interview with Wikimedia Executive Director Sue Gardner Guiding Principles of the Wikimedia Foundation and the Wikimedia Community The following article by Sue Gardner, the current Executive Director of the Wikimedia Foundation, has received broad distribution and summarizes some of the core cultural values shared by Wikimedia’s staff, board and community. Topics covered include: • Freedom and open source • Serving every human being • Transparency • Accountability • Stewardship • Shared power • Internationalism • Free speech • Independence More information can be found at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Sue_Gardner/Wikimedia_Foundation_Guiding_Principles Wikimedia Policies The Wikimedia Foundation has an extensive list of policies and procedures available online at: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Policies Wikimedia Projects All major projects of the Wikimedia Foundation are collaboratively developed by users around the world using the MediaWiki software.
    [Show full text]
  • A Topic-Aligned Multilingual Corpus of Wikipedia Articles for Studying Information Asymmetry in Low Resource Languages
    Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2020), pages 2373–2380 Marseille, 11–16 May 2020 c European Language Resources Association (ELRA), licensed under CC-BY-NC A Topic-Aligned Multilingual Corpus of Wikipedia Articles for Studying Information Asymmetry in Low Resource Languages Dwaipayan Roy, Sumit Bhatia, Prateek Jain GESIS - Cologne, IBM Research - Delhi, IIIT - Delhi [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract Wikipedia is the largest web-based open encyclopedia covering more than three hundred languages. However, different language editions of Wikipedia differ significantly in terms of their information coverage. We present a systematic comparison of information coverage in English Wikipedia (most exhaustive) and Wikipedias in eight other widely spoken languages (Arabic, German, Hindi, Korean, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish and Turkish). We analyze the content present in the respective Wikipedias in terms of the coverage of topics as well as the depth of coverage of topics included in these Wikipedias. Our analysis quantifies and provides useful insights about the information gap that exists between different language editions of Wikipedia and offers a roadmap for the Information Retrieval (IR) community to bridge this gap. Keywords: Wikipedia, Knowledge base, Information gap 1. Introduction other with respect to the coverage of topics as well as Wikipedia is the largest web-based encyclopedia covering the amount of information about overlapping topics.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Wikimedia Communities of India
    State of Wikimedia Communities of India Assamese http://as.wikipedia.org State of Assamese Wikipedia RISE OF ASSAMESE WIKIPEDIA Number of edits and internal links EDITS PER MONTH INTERNAL LINKS GROWTH OF ASSAMESE WIKIPEDIA Number of good Date Articles January 2010 263 December 2012 301 (around 3 articles per month) November 2011 742 (around 40 articles per month) Future Plans Awareness Sessions and Wiki Academy Workshops in Universities of Assam. Conduct Assamese Editing Workshops to groom writers to write in Assamese. Future Plans Awareness Sessions and Wiki Academy Workshops in Universities of Assam. Conduct Assamese Editing Workshops to groom writers to write in Assamese. THANK YOU Bengali বাংলা উইকিপিডিয়া Bengali Wikipedia http://bn.wikipedia.org/ By Bengali Wikipedia community Bengali Language • 6th most spoken language • 230 million speakers Bengali Language • National language of Bangladesh • Official language of India • Official language in Sierra Leone Bengali Wikipedia • Started in 2004 • 22,000 articles • 2,500 page views per month • 150 active editors Bengali Wikipedia • Monthly meet ups • W10 anniversary • Women’s Wikipedia workshop Wikimedia Bangladesh local chapter approved in 2011 by Wikimedia Foundation English State of WikiProject India on ENGLISH WIKIPEDIA ● One of the largest Indian Wikipedias. ● WikiProject started on 11 July 2006 by GaneshK, an NRI. ● Number of article:89,874 articles. (Excludes those that are not tagged with the WikiProject banner) ● Editors – 465 (active) ● Featured content : FAs - 55, FLs - 20, A class – 2, GAs – 163. BASIC STATISTICS ● B class – 1188 ● C class – 801 ● Start – 10,931 ● Stub – 43,666 ● Unassessed for quality – 20,875 ● Unknown importance – 61,061 ● Cleanup tags – 43,080 articles & 71,415 tags BASIC STATISTICS ● Diversity of opinion ● Lack of reliable sources ● Indic sources „lost in translation“ ● Editor skills need to be upgraded ● Lack of leadership ● Lack of coordinated activities ● ….
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling Popularity and Reliability of Sources in Multilingual Wikipedia
    information Article Modeling Popularity and Reliability of Sources in Multilingual Wikipedia Włodzimierz Lewoniewski * , Krzysztof W˛ecel and Witold Abramowicz Department of Information Systems, Pozna´nUniversity of Economics and Business, 61-875 Pozna´n,Poland; [email protected] (K.W.); [email protected] (W.A.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 31 March 2020; Accepted: 7 May 2020; Published: 13 May 2020 Abstract: One of the most important factors impacting quality of content in Wikipedia is presence of reliable sources. By following references, readers can verify facts or find more details about described topic. A Wikipedia article can be edited independently in any of over 300 languages, even by anonymous users, therefore information about the same topic may be inconsistent. This also applies to use of references in different language versions of a particular article, so the same statement can have different sources. In this paper we analyzed over 40 million articles from the 55 most developed language versions of Wikipedia to extract information about over 200 million references and find the most popular and reliable sources. We presented 10 models for the assessment of the popularity and reliability of the sources based on analysis of meta information about the references in Wikipedia articles, page views and authors of the articles. Using DBpedia and Wikidata we automatically identified the alignment of the sources to a specific domain. Additionally, we analyzed the changes of popularity and reliability in time and identified growth leaders in each of the considered months. The results can be used for quality improvements of the content in different languages versions of Wikipedia.
    [Show full text]
  • News Release
    NEWS RELEASE For immediate release Sue Gardner to deliver 16th annual LaFontaine-Baldwin Lecture Former head of CBC.ca and Wikimedia Foundation to open 6 Degrees Toronto TORONTO, August 13, 2018—6 Degrees announces that the 2018 LaFontaine-Baldwin Lecture will be delivered by leading digital pioneer Sue Gardner. The lecture will be given on September 24 as part of 6 Degrees Toronto, a project of the Institute for Canadian Citizenship. As senior director of CBC.ca, Gardner reinvented the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation’s place in the world of digital news. Later, as executive director of the Wikimedia Foundation, she played a crucial role in the explosive growth of Wikipedia. The San Francisco–based Gardner continues to be a sought-after global thought-leader: she currently advises media and technology companies, and serves on the boards of Privacy International and the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project. “Sue Gardner is on the forefront of ideas on technology, democracy, and women’s roles in our society,” said ICC Co-founder and Co-chair John Ralston Saul. “As we witness the alarming erosion of democratic institutions, I can’t think of a more relevant voice to address the challenges ahead. I can’t wait to welcome Sue home to Toronto to deliver this year’s LaFontaine-Baldwin Lecture.” Titled Dark Times Ahead: Taking Back Truth, Freedom, and Technology, the interactive event will include Gardner in conversation with John Ralston Saul. Gardner joins an illustrious list of past LaFontaine-Baldwin lecturers, including His Highness the Aga Khan, Naomi Klein, Shawn A-in-chut Atleo, Michael Sandel, and Naheed Nenshi.
    [Show full text]
  • Omnipedia: Bridging the Wikipedia Language
    Omnipedia: Bridging the Wikipedia Language Gap Patti Bao*†, Brent Hecht†, Samuel Carton†, Mahmood Quaderi†, Michael Horn†§, Darren Gergle*† *Communication Studies, †Electrical Engineering & Computer Science, §Learning Sciences Northwestern University {patti,brent,sam.carton,quaderi}@u.northwestern.edu, {michael-horn,dgergle}@northwestern.edu ABSTRACT language edition contains its own cultural viewpoints on a We present Omnipedia, a system that allows Wikipedia large number of topics [7, 14, 15, 27]. On the other hand, readers to gain insight from up to 25 language editions of the language barrier serves to silo knowledge [2, 4, 33], Wikipedia simultaneously. Omnipedia highlights the slowing the transfer of less culturally imbued information similarities and differences that exist among Wikipedia between language editions and preventing Wikipedia’s 422 language editions, and makes salient information that is million monthly visitors [12] from accessing most of the unique to each language as well as that which is shared information on the site. more widely. We detail solutions to numerous front-end and algorithmic challenges inherent to providing users with In this paper, we present Omnipedia, a system that attempts a multilingual Wikipedia experience. These include to remedy this situation at a large scale. It reduces the silo visualizing content in a language-neutral way and aligning effect by providing users with structured access in their data in the face of diverse information organization native language to over 7.5 million concepts from up to 25 strategies. We present a study of Omnipedia that language editions of Wikipedia. At the same time, it characterizes how people interact with information using a highlights similarities and differences between each of the multilingual lens.
    [Show full text]
  • Collaboration: Interoperability Between People in the Creation of Language Resources for Less-Resourced Languages a SALTMIL Workshop May 27, 2008 Workshop Programme
    Collaboration: interoperability between people in the creation of language resources for less-resourced languages A SALTMIL workshop May 27, 2008 Workshop Programme 14:30-14:35 Welcome 14:35-15:05 Icelandic Language Technology Ten Years Later Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson 15:05-15:35 Human Language Technology Resources for Less Commonly Taught Languages: Lessons Learned Toward Creation of Basic Language Resources Heather Simpson, Christopher Cieri, Kazuaki Maeda, Kathryn Baker, and Boyan Onyshkevych 15:35-16:05 Building resources for African languages Karel Pala, Sonja Bosch, and Christiane Fellbaum 16:05-16:45 COFFEE BREAK 16:45-17:15 Extracting bilingual word pairs from Wikipedia Francis M. Tyers and Jacques A. Pienaar 17:15-17:45 Building a Basque/Spanish bilingual database for speaker verification Iker Luengo, Eva Navas, Iñaki Sainz, Ibon Saratxaga, Jon Sanchez, Igor Odriozola, Juan J. Igarza and Inma Hernaez 17:45-18:15 Language resources for Uralic minority languages Attila Novák 18:15-18:45 Eslema. Towards a Corpus for Asturian Xulio Viejo, Roser Saurí and Angel Neira 18:45-19:00 Annual General Meeting of the SALTMIL SIG i Workshop Organisers Briony Williams Language Technologies Unit Bangor University, Wales, UK Mikel L. Forcada Departament de Llenguatges i Sistemes Informàtics Universitat d'Alacant, Spain Kepa Sarasola Lengoaia eta Sistema Informatikoak Saila Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea / University of the Basque Country SALTMIL Speech and Language Technologies for Minority Languages A SIG of the International Speech Communication Association
    [Show full text]
  • The Culture of Wikipedia
    Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia Good Faith Collaboration The Culture of Wikipedia Joseph Michael Reagle Jr. Foreword by Lawrence Lessig The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Web edition, Copyright © 2011 by Joseph Michael Reagle Jr. CC-NC-SA 3.0 Purchase at Amazon.com | Barnes and Noble | IndieBound | MIT Press Wikipedia's style of collaborative production has been lauded, lambasted, and satirized. Despite unease over its implications for the character (and quality) of knowledge, Wikipedia has brought us closer than ever to a realization of the centuries-old Author Bio & Research Blog pursuit of a universal encyclopedia. Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia is a rich ethnographic portrayal of Wikipedia's historical roots, collaborative culture, and much debated legacy. Foreword Preface to the Web Edition Praise for Good Faith Collaboration Preface Extended Table of Contents "Reagle offers a compelling case that Wikipedia's most fascinating and unprecedented aspect isn't the encyclopedia itself — rather, it's the collaborative culture that underpins it: brawling, self-reflexive, funny, serious, and full-tilt committed to the 1. Nazis and Norms project, even if it means setting aside personal differences. Reagle's position as a scholar and a member of the community 2. The Pursuit of the Universal makes him uniquely situated to describe this culture." —Cory Doctorow , Boing Boing Encyclopedia "Reagle provides ample data regarding the everyday practices and cultural norms of the community which collaborates to 3. Good Faith Collaboration produce Wikipedia. His rich research and nuanced appreciation of the complexities of cultural digital media research are 4. The Puzzle of Openness well presented.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Contributions to Wikipedia from Tor
    Are anonymity-seekers just like everybody else? An analysis of contributions to Wikipedia from Tor Chau Tran Kaylea Champion Andrea Forte Department of Computer Science & Engineering Department of Communication College of Computing & Informatics New York University University of Washington Drexel University New York, USA Seatle, USA Philadelphia, USA [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Benjamin Mako Hill Rachel Greenstadt Department of Communication Department of Computer Science & Engineering University of Washington New York University Seatle, USA New York, USA [email protected] [email protected] Abstract—User-generated content sites routinely block contri- butions from users of privacy-enhancing proxies like Tor because of a perception that proxies are a source of vandalism, spam, and abuse. Although these blocks might be effective, collateral damage in the form of unrealized valuable contributions from anonymity seekers is invisible. One of the largest and most important user-generated content sites, Wikipedia, has attempted to block contributions from Tor users since as early as 2005. We demonstrate that these blocks have been imperfect and that thousands of attempts to edit on Wikipedia through Tor have been successful. We draw upon several data sources and analytical techniques to measure and describe the history of Tor editing on Wikipedia over time and to compare contributions from Tor users to those from other groups of Wikipedia users. Fig. 1. Screenshot of the page a user is shown when they attempt to edit the Our analysis suggests that although Tor users who slip through Wikipedia article on “Privacy” while using Tor. Wikipedia’s ban contribute content that is more likely to be reverted and to revert others, their contributions are otherwise similar in quality to those from other unregistered participants and to the initial contributions of registered users.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Contribute Climate Change Information to Wikipedia : a Guide
    HOW TO CONTRIBUTE CLIMATE CHANGE INFORMATION TO WIKIPEDIA Emma Baker, Lisa McNamara, Beth Mackay, Katharine Vincent; ; © 2021, CDKN This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction, provided the original work is properly credited. Cette œuvre est mise à disposition selon les termes de la licence Creative Commons Attribution (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode), qui permet l’utilisation, la distribution et la reproduction sans restriction, pourvu que le mérite de la création originale soit adéquatement reconnu. IDRC Grant/ Subvention du CRDI: 108754-001-CDKN knowledge accelerator for climate compatible development How to contribute climate change information to Wikipedia A guide for researchers, practitioners and communicators Contents About this guide .................................................................................................................................................... 5 1 Why Wikipedia is an important tool to communicate climate change information .................................................................................................................................. 7 1.1 Enhancing the quality of online climate change information ............................................. 8 1.2 Sharing your work more widely ......................................................................................................8 1.3 Why researchers should
    [Show full text]