DOCSLIB.ORG

CORRECTED SI Appendix Ms. 2016-19013R

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CORRECTED SI Appendix Ms. 2016-19013R SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION (SI) APPENDIX Early human symbolic behavior in the Late Pleistocene of Wallacea Adam Brumm, Michelle C. Langley, Mark W. Moore, Budianto Hakim, Muhammad Ramli, Iwan Sumantri, Basran Burhan, Andi Muhammad Saiful, Linda Siagian, Suryatman, Ratno Sardi, Andi Jusdi, Abdullah, Andi Pampang Mubarak, Hasliana, Hasrianti, Adhi Agus Oktaviana, Shinatria Adhityatama, Gerrit D. van den Bergh, Maxime Aubert, Jian-xin Zhao, Jillian Huntley, Bo Li, Richard G. Roberts, E. Wahyu Saptomo, Yinika Perston, Rainer Grün Archaeological context The cave and rock-shelter complex of Leang Bulu Bettue (LBB) (4°59'31.18"S, 119°40'5.53"E) is situated at the foot of a limestone tower in the Maros-Pangkep karst area, which lies between 4˚7´S and 5˚1´S on Sulawesi’s southwestern peninsula. The topography of this extensive karst landscape (~450 km2) is dominated by plateau-like hill masses formed by rivers cutting through intersecting joints in the limestone, and, in areas of advanced plateau dissection, steep-sided towers surrounded by alluvial plains that extend to the western coastline at an elevation of ~5 to 30 m a.s.l. (1). Some 120 sites with archaeological evidence for prehistoric human occupation, mostly in the form of rock art and/or surficial artifact scatters (e.g., flaked stone implements, ceramics, and shell midden refuse), have been recorded in this region. Prior to the current research, the oldest excavated archaeological findings dated to 35.6–34.5 ka cal B.P., as revealed by excavations at the Maros rock-shelter Leang Burung 2 (2). Some 20 km to the north, where the limestone karst crops out in the adjoining Pangkep district, excavations at a rock art site located 20 m above the alluvial plain, Leang Sakapao 1, yielded in situ stone artifacts and shellfish remains with a (nominal) maximum age of 30–20 ka (3). LBB is located within a precinct of major prehistoric sites: Leang Burung 2 is 1.5 km to the south (2); 1 km to the southwest is Leang Timpuseng, a rock-shelter with a hand stencil and large figurative painting of a female babirusa ‘pig-deer’ with minimum Uranium-series (U-series) ages of 39.9 ka and 35.4 ka, respectively (4); and 300 m to the northwest is Ulu Leang 1 cave (5). The latter cave site has yielded the region’s best-known record of the Toalean (6-8), a regionally unique industry of purportedly Mesolithic character and presumed middle to late Holocene antiquity (5, 9, 10). The Toalean is characterized by backed blades, geometric microliths, and small pressure-flaked projectiles with hollow bases and serrated margins (‘Maros points’). LBB is currently situated 20 km east of the modern coastline. However, a 40-60 km-wide carbonate platform (known as the ‘Spermonde Shelf’) lies off the modern coastline of Sulawesi’s southwestern peninsula adjacent to the alluvial plains fronting the Maros-Pangkep karsts (11-12). Presently, the shelf harbors a network of 67 low-lying coral atoll islands, as well as platform reefs, submerged patch reefs, and sea-grass meadows, and it is bordered on its western side by a discontinuous barrier reef (11). Referred to locally as the Sangkarang islands, the 200 km-long Spermonde archipelago is one of Indonesia’s largest coral archipelagos, and it contains what is probably the largest reef fishery in the region. The maximum shelf depth varies from 20 to 60 m (11-12), and hence it is likely the Spermonde Shelf would have been exposed as dry land when sea level dropped to below -60 m (11). Further, it can be speculated that the major decline in sea levels that commenced ~30 ka would have progressively eliminated the mosaic of shallow coastal flats, estuaries, and coral habitats that would have been established on the shelf during much of MIS3. These highly ranked patches are likely to have been preferentially exploited by AMH colonists whose initial migration through Wallacea is thought, by some, to have relied upon a highly developed marine coastal adaptation with roots that may ultimately extend back into the Middle Stone Age period of southern Africa (13-16). Speleothem δ18O records obtained from U/Th analysis of 77 stalagmites in the Maros-Pangkep 1 karsts lack precise coverage for the time interval covered by the LBB sequence (17). However, high-resolution palaeoclimate records derived from lake sediment cores in central Sulawesi indicate a very wet climate and closed-canopy rainforest during much of MIS3 (~58 to 30 ka) (17-18). This phase is followed by the abrupt onset of a period of severe drying in the transition to the LGM, with the arid phase documented from ~33–16 ka at Lake Towuti (18), and from ~29–14 ka at nearby 13 Lake Matano (19). Biomarker records (δ CWAX) from these two lakes suggest grassland and open- canopy forest expanded during a more arid and seasonal MIS2 (19), with substantial expansion of C4 grasslands between 30 and 18 ka (18). Evidence for a human presence at LBB during most of MIS3 is scant. The low-density cultural assemblages show that people were making short-lived visits to this locality, while rock art is evident at nearby sites from at least 40 ka (4). Resource patches in the karst border plains of Maros-Pangkep may have became increasingly attractive to maritime-orientated populations as the climate became cooler and drier in the millennia preceding the LGM. This situation was owing to the decline in marine productivity along the coast – especially reef habitats on the now-submerged Spermonde Shelf – and the transition from closed- canopy rainforest, where return rates on forager investment are generally seen as being low (15), to open vegetation. LBB comprises a valley floor entrance rock-shelter with a roof height of 15.6 m, and an adjoining, slightly more elevated cave chamber that is 27.3 m long, 12.6 m wide, and up to 9.2 m high. Rock art is visible on the walls and ceiling, including hand stencils (n = 35) overlaid by Austronesian- style drawings (4). During annual excavation seasons at LBB conducted between 2013 and 2015, we opened up a large trench that extended southwards from the cave entrance to the central floor area of the shelter. Our trench has revealed an archaeological sequence of human occupation that is divisible internally and on stratigraphic and chronological grounds into two distinct phases: Phase II: Historical (<1790 A.D.) and ‘Neolithic’ (1.7–1.6 ka cal B.P.); and Phase I: MIS 3/2 (~50–22 ka). The excavated archaeological findings reported in the present study were recovered from Layers 4a- e in Phase I. These are the uppermost Pleistocene deposits preserved at the site. A 108 cm-thick sequence of flowstones separates these sediments from overlying Holocene strata. The capping flowstones sealed-off the Pleistocene layers and protected them from erosion and anthropogenic disturbances. The Layers 4a-e sequence comprises thin silty clays (Layers 4a-b) that slope downwards from the rear of the cave and level out and thicken in the main shelter, where they inter- finger with ashy lenses (Layers 4c-e). This combined sequence is 1.5 m thick. Below this is a 50 cm-thick sandy clay (Layer 4f) that is only preserved near the eastern wall of the cave and which is underlain by a 50 cm-thick sandy clay (Layer 5). Site chronology Dating results for the site are reported in ref. 20 and summarized in SI Table 1. Charcoal preservation in the Pleistocene deposits was extremely poor. Consequently, we conducted solution U-series dating of two in situ, still-emplaced vertical stalagmites that sandwiched Layer 4a, enabling us to bracket the time-range of this key depositional unit. The uppermost stalagmite (Stalagmite 485), which formed directly atop Layer 4a, has a basal U-series age of 13.7 ± 1.8 ka. This result provides a minimum age for Layer 4a and underlying deposits. The lowermost stalagmite (#605) grew on the upper surface of Layer 4b. This speleothem has a basal U-series age of 25.9 ± 0.7 ka, thus providing a maximum age for overlying Layer 4a and a minimum age for Layer 4b and the strata below it. The high-precision U-series stalagmite chronology allows us to bracket the time-depth of Layer 4a to between approximately 26 and 14 ka. In order to more tightly constrain the age of Layer 4a, we conducted AMS 14C-dating of freshwater gastropod (Tylomelania perfecta) shells and laser ablation U-series dating of a pig tooth. We also carried out AMS 14C-dating on two T. perfecta shells collected from laterally continuous exposures of Layer 4a revealed by excavations inside the adjoining rock-shelter. These three independent dating methods allow us to infer a time-depth of 2 approximately 26–22 ka for Layer 4a. Layers 4b-e span ~30–26 ka, as inferred from the overlying stalagmite dates, laser ablation U-series analysis of faunal remains, and radiocarbon dating. A bovid tooth from Layer 4f yielded a minimum U-series age of 39.8 ± 0.2 ka, which, in combination with the above chronological data, suggests this unit spans ~40–30 ka. U-series analysis of a bovid molar from basal Layer 5 provided an in- sequence minimum age of 51.8 ± 0.6 ka, providing Layer 5 with a provisional time-range of ~50– 40 ka. We also undertook optical dating on two samples LBB-I and LBB-II from Layer 4a and Layer 5, respectively, based on infrared stimulated luminescence (IRSL) measurements on volcanic !!.! feldspars (see ref.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • When Humans First Plied the Deep Blue Sea
    NEWS FROM IN AND AROUND THE REGION When humans first plied the deep blue sea In a shallow cave on an island north of Australia, researchers have made a surprising discovery: the 42,000-year-old bones of tuna and sharks that were clearly brought there by human hands. The find, reported online in Science, provides the strongest evidence yet that people were deep-sea fishing so long ago. And those maritime skills may have allowed the inhabitants of this region to colonise lands far and wide. The earliest known boats, found in France and the Neth- erlands, are only 10,000 years old, but archaeologists know they don’t tell the whole story. Wood and other common boat-building materials don’t preserve well in the archaeological record. And the colonisation of Aus- tralia and the nearby islands of Southeast Asia, which began at least 45,000 years ago, required sea crossings of at least 30 kilometres. Yet whether these early migrants put out to sea deliberately in boats or simply drifted with the tides in rafts meant for near-shore exploration has been a matter of fierce debate.1 Indeed, direct evidence for early seafaring skills has been lacking. Although modern humans were exploit- ing near-shore resources2 such as mussels and abalone, by 165,000 years ago, only a few controversial sites suggest that our early ancestors fished deep waters by 45,000 years Archaeologists have found evidence of deep-sea fishing ago. (The earliest sure sites are only about 12,000 years 42,000 years ago at Jerimalai, a cave on the eastern end of East Timor (Images: Susan O’Connor).
    [Show full text]
  • 1. the Archaeology of Sulawesi: an Update 3 Points—And, Second, to Obtain Radiocarbon Dates for the Toalean
    1 The archaeology of Sulawesi: An update, 2016 Muhammad Irfan Mahmud Symposium overview The symposium on ‘The Archaeology of Sulawesi – An Update’ was held in Makassar between 31 January (registration day) and 3 February 2016 (field-trip day) as a joint initiative between the Balai Arkeologi Makassar (Balar Makassar, Makassar Archaeology Office) and The Australian National University (ANU). The main organisers were Sue O’Connor, David Bulbeck and Juliet Meyer from ANU, who are also the editors of this volume, and Budianto Hakim from Balar Makassar. Funding for the symposium was provided by an Australian Research Council Discovery Grant (DP110101357) to Sue O’Connor, Jack Fenner, Janelle Stevenson (ANU) and Ben Marwick (University of Washington) for the project ‘The archaeology of Sulawesi: A strategic island for understanding modern human colonization and interactions across our region’. Between 1 and 2 February, 30 papers were presented by contributors representing ANU, Balar Makassar, the National Research Centre for Archaeology (Jakarta), Balai Makassar Manado, Hasanuddin University (Makassar), Gadjah Mada University (Yogyakarta), Bandung Institute of Technology, Geology Museum in Bandung, Griffith University and James Cook University (Queensland), University of Wollongong and University of New England (New South Wales), University of Göttingen and Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (Germany), the University of Leeds (United Kingdom), Brown University (United States of America) and Tokai University (Japan). Not all of the presenters
    [Show full text]
  • © in This Web Service Cambridge University
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-01829-7 - Human Adaptation in the Asian Palaeolithic: Hominin Dispersal and Behaviour during the Late Quaternary Ryan J. Rabett Index More information Index Abdur, 88 Arborophilia sp., 219 Abri Pataud, 76 Arctictis binturong, 218, 229, 230, 231, 263 Accipiter trivirgatus,cf.,219 Arctogalidia trivirgata, 229 Acclimatization, 2, 7, 268, 271 Arctonyx collaris, 241 Acculturation, 70, 279, 288 Arcy-sur-Cure, 75 Acheulean, 26, 27, 28, 29, 45, 47, 48, 51, 52, 58, 88 Arius sp., 219 Acheulo-Yabrudian, 48 Asian leaf turtle. See Cyclemys dentata Adaptation Asian soft-shell turtle. See Amyda cartilaginea high frequency processes, 286 Asian wild dog. See Cuon alipinus hominin adaptive trajectories, 7, 267, 268 Assamese macaque. See Macaca assamensis low frequency processes, 286–287 Athapaskan, 278 tropical foragers (Southeast Asia), 283 Atlantic thermohaline circulation (THC), 23–24 Variability selection hypothesis, 285–286 Attirampakkam, 106 Additive strategies Aurignacian, 69, 71, 72, 73, 76, 78, 102, 103, 268, 272 economic, 274, 280. See Strategy-switching Developed-, 280 (economic) Proto-, 70, 78 technological, 165, 206, 283, 289 Australo-Melanesian population, 109, 116 Agassi, Lake, 285 Australopithecines (robust), 286 Ahmarian, 80 Azilian, 74 Ailuropoda melanoleuca fovealis, 35 Airstrip Mound site, 136 Bacsonian, 188, 192, 194 Altai Mountains, 50, 51, 94, 103 Balobok rock-shelter, 159 Altamira, 73 Ban Don Mun, 54 Amyda cartilaginea, 218, 230 Ban Lum Khao, 164, 165 Amyda sp., 37 Ban Mae Tha, 54 Anderson, D.D., 111, 201 Ban Rai, 203 Anorrhinus galeritus, 219 Banteng. See Bos cf. javanicus Anthracoceros coronatus, 219 Banyan Valley Cave, 201 Anthracoceros malayanus, 219 Barranco Leon,´ 29 Anthropocene, 8, 9, 274, 286, 289 BAT 1, 173, 174 Aq Kupruk, 104, 105 BAT 2, 173 Arboreal-adapted taxa, 96, 110, 111, 113, 122, 151, 152, Bat hawk.
    [Show full text]
  • Establishing Robust Chronologies for Models of Modern Human
    Establishing robust chronologies for models of modern human dispersal in Southeast Asia; implications for arrival and occupation in Sunda and Sahul A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree Masters of Research from MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY by Lani M. Barnes BSc. Macquarie University Department of Environment and Geography 10 October 2014 1 Table of Contents ABSTRACT I DECLARATION II ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS III LIST OF FIGURES IV LIST OF TABLES VI LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS VII CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES 3 1.2 OUTLINE 3 CHAPTER 2: ESTABLISHING MODERN HUMAN PRESENCE IN MAINLAND SOUTHEAST ASIA; THE NEED FOR ROBUST CHRONOLOGIES 4 SECTION I: CURRENT MODELS OF MODERN HUMAN DISPERSAL AND THE PALEOANTHROPOLOGICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORD 4 2.1 INTRODUCTION 4 2.2 THE START AND END OF OUT OF AFRICA 2 4 2.3 MIS4-3 RAPID COASTAL DISPERSAL 5 2.4 MODERN HUMAN EVIDENCE IN SUNDA AND SAHUL 7 2.5 THE CONTRIBUTION OF MIDDLE PALAEOLITHIC TECHNOLOGIES TO UNDERSTANDING THE COMPLEXITIES REGARDING MODELS OF MODERN HUMAN DISPERSAL 9 SECTION II: CHRONOMETRIC TECHNIQUES AVAILABLE TO ESTABLISH ROBUST CHRONOLOGIES FOR MODERN HUMAN PALEOANTHROPOLOGICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE 12 2.6 INTRODUCTION 12 2.7 URANIUM-THORIUM (U-TH) DATING 12 2.8 LUMINESCENCE DATING 14 2.9 RADIOCARBON DATING 17 2.10 IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH IN MAINLAND SOUTHEAST ASIA 18 CHAPTER 3: BUILDING FROM PREVIOUS RESEARCH AT THE SITES OF TAM PA LING, NAM LOT AND THAM LOD TO ESTABLISH ROBUST CHRONOLOGIES 20 3.1 TAM HANG CAVES LAOS 20 3.1.1
    [Show full text]
  • The Llonin Cave (Peñamellera Alta, Asturias, Spain), Level III (Galería
    Marianne Deschamps, Sandrine Costamagno, Pierre-Yves Milcent, Jean- Marc Pétillon, Caroline Renard et Nicolas Valdeyron (dir.) La conquête de la montagne : des premières occupations humaines à l’anthropisation du milieu Éditions du Comité des travaux historiques et scientifiques The Llonin Cave (Peñamellera Alta, Asturias, Spain), level III (Galería): techno-typological characterisation of the Badegoulian lithic and bone assemblages La grotte de Llonin (Peñamellera Alta, Asturias, Espagne), niveau III de la galerie : caractérisation techno-typologique des assemblages lithiques et osseux du Badegoulien Marco de la Rasilla Vives, Elsa Duarte Matías, Joan Emili Aura Tortosa, Alfred Sanchis Serra, Yolanda Carrión Marco, Manuel Pérez Ripoll and Vicente Rodríguez Otero DOI: 10.4000/books.cths.6362 Publisher: Éditions du Comité des travaux historiques et scientifiques Place of publication: Éditions du Comité des travaux historiques et scientifiques Year of publication: 2019 Published on OpenEdition Books: 20 December 2019 Serie: Actes des congrès nationaux des sociétés historiques et scientifiques Electronic ISBN: 9782735508846 http://books.openedition.org Electronic reference RASILLA VIVES, Marco de la ; et al. The Llonin Cave (Peñamellera Alta, Asturias, Spain), level III (Galería): techno-typological characterisation of the Badegoulian lithic and bone assemblages In: La conquête de la montagne : des premières occupations humaines à l’anthropisation du milieu [online]. Paris: Éditions du Comité des travaux historiques et scientifiques, 2019 (generated
    [Show full text]
  • Human Origin Sites and the World Heritage Convention in Eurasia
    World Heritage papers41 HEADWORLD HERITAGES 4 Human Origin Sites and the World Heritage Convention in Eurasia VOLUME I In support of UNESCO’s 70th Anniversary Celebrations United Nations [ Cultural Organization Human Origin Sites and the World Heritage Convention in Eurasia Nuria Sanz, Editor General Coordinator of HEADS Programme on Human Evolution HEADS 4 VOLUME I Published in 2015 by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 7, place de Fontenoy, 75352 Paris 07 SP, France and the UNESCO Office in Mexico, Presidente Masaryk 526, Polanco, Miguel Hidalgo, 11550 Ciudad de Mexico, D.F., Mexico. © UNESCO 2015 ISBN 978-92-3-100107-9 This publication is available in Open Access under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO (CC-BY-SA 3.0 IGO) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/igo/). By using the content of this publication, the users accept to be bound by the terms of use of the UNESCO Open Access Repository (http://www.unesco.org/open-access/terms-use-ccbysa-en). The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNESCO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The ideas and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors; they are not necessarily those of UNESCO and do not commit the Organization. Cover Photos: Top: Hohle Fels excavation. © Harry Vetter bottom (from left to right): Petroglyphs from Sikachi-Alyan rock art site.
    [Show full text]
  • Homo Erectus, Became Extinct About 1.7 Million Years Ago
    Bear & Company One Park Street Rochester, Vermont 05767 www.BearandCompanyBooks.com Bear & Company is a division of Inner Traditions International Copyright © 2013 by Frank Joseph All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Joseph, Frank. Before Atlantis : 20 million years of human and pre-human cultures / Frank Joseph. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. Summary: “A comprehensive exploration of Earth’s ancient past, the evolution of humanity, the rise of civilization, and the effects of global catastrophe”—Provided by publisher. print ISBN: 978-1-59143-157-2 ebook ISBN: 978-1-59143-826-7 1. Prehistoric peoples. 2. Civilization, Ancient. 3. Atlantis (Legendary place) I. Title. GN740.J68 2013 930—dc23 2012037131 Chapter 8 is a revised, expanded version of the original article that appeared in The Barnes Review (Washington, D.C., Volume XVII, Number 4, July/August 2011), and chapter 9 is a revised and expanded version of the original article that appeared in The Barnes Review (Washington, D.C., Volume XVII, Number 5, September/October 2011). Both are republished here with permission. To send correspondence to the author of this book, mail a first-class letter to the author c/o Inner Traditions • Bear & Company, One Park Street, Rochester, VT 05767, and we will forward the communication. BEFORE ATLANTIS “Making use of extensive evidence from biology, genetics, geology, archaeology, art history, cultural anthropology, and archaeoastronomy, Frank Joseph offers readers many intriguing alternative ideas about the origin of the human species, the origin of civilization, and the peopling of the Americas.” MICHAEL A.
    [Show full text]
  • When Did Homo Sapiens First Reach Southeast Asia and Sahul?
    PERSPECTIVE PERSPECTIVE When did Homo sapiens first reach Southeast Asia and Sahul? James F. O’Connella,1, Jim Allenb, Martin A. J. Williamsc, Alan N. Williamsd,e, Chris S. M. Turneyf,g, Nigel A. Spoonerh,i, Johan Kammingaj, Graham Brownk,l,m, and Alan Cooperg,n Edited by Richard G. Klein, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, and approved July 5, 2018 (received for review May 31, 2018) Anatomically modern humans (Homo sapiens, AMH) began spreading across Eurasia from Africa and adjacent Southwest Asia about 50,000–55,000 years ago (ca.50–55 ka). Some have argued that human genetic, fossil, and archaeological data indicate one or more prior dispersals, possibly as early as 120 ka. A recently reported age estimate of 65 ka for Madjedbebe, an archaeological site in northern Sahul (Pleistocene Australia–New Guinea), if correct, offers what might be the strongest support yet presented for a pre–55-ka African AMH exodus. We review evidence for AMH arrival on an arc spanning South China through Sahul and then evaluate data from Madjedbebe. We find that an age estimate of >50 ka for this site is unlikely to be valid. While AMH may have moved far beyond Africa well before 50–55 ka, data from the region of interest offered in support of this idea are not compelling. Homo sapiens | anatomically modern humans | Late Pleistocene | Madjedbebe | Sahul Fossil data suggest that the modern human lineage Advocates envision a stepwise spread in at least two appeared in Africa by 300 ka (1). There is broad but not stages, the first across southern Eurasia and another universal agreement that near-modern or modern hu- much later into higher latitudes, including Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Titel Der Dissertation
    Detecting microscopic aspects of Late Pleistocene to Early/Mid Holocene lithic technology in Island Southeast Asia: Perspectives from North and Central Sulawesi Dissertation der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) vorgelegt von Mr. Riczar Fuentes aus Sara, Iloilo, Philippines Tübingen 2019 Gedruckt mit Genehmigung der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen. Tag der mündlichen Qualifikation: 16.01.2020 Dekan: Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Rosenstiel 1. Berichterstatter: Prof. Dr. Nicholas Conard 2. Berichterstatter: Prof. Dr. Alfred Pawlik Detecting microscopic aspects of Late Pleistocene to Early/Mid Holocene lithic technology in Island Southeast Asia: perspectives from North and Central Sulawesi Submitted by: Riczar B. Fuentes, M.A. Ph.D. Candidate Abteilung für Frühgeschichte und Quartärökologie Institut für Ur- und Frühgeschichte und Archäologie des Mittelalters Faculty of Science Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen Submitted to: Prof. Nicholas J. Conard, Ph.D. Adviser Abteilung für Frühgeschichte und Quartärökologie Institut für Ur- und Frühgeschichte und Archäologie des Mittelalters Faculty of Science Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Alfred F. Pawlik Co-adviser Department of Sociology and Anthropology Ateneo de Manila University 1 Table of Contents 1. Acknowledgments ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Michelle C. Langley Editor
    Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology Series Michelle C. Langley Editor Osseous Projectile Weaponry Towards an Understanding of Pleistocene Cultural Variability Osseous Projectile Weaponry Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology Series Edited by Eric Delson Vertebrate Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History New York, NY 10024,USA [email protected] Eric J. Sargis Anthropology, Yale University New Haven, CT 06520,USA [email protected] Focal topics for volumes in the series will include systematic paleontology of all vertebrates (from agnathans to humans), phylogeny reconstruction, functional morphology, Paleolithic archaeology, taphonomy, geochronology, historical biogeography, and biostratigraphy. Other fields (e.g., paleoclimatology, paleoecology, ancient DNA, total organismal community structure) may be considered if the volume theme emphasizes paleobiology (or archaeology). Fields such as modeling of physical processes, genetic methodology, nonvertebrates or neontology are out of our scope. Volumes in the series may either be monographic treatments (including unpublished but fully revised dissertations) or edited col- lections, especially those focusing on problem-oriented issues, with multidisciplinary coverage where possible. Editorial Advisory Board Ross D. E. MacPhee (American Museum of Natural History), Peter Makovicky (The Field Museum), Sally McBrearty (University of Connecticut), Jin Meng (American Museum of Natural History), Tom Plummer (Queens College/CUNY). More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/6978
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Archaeological Dating Efforts at Cave and Rockshelter Sites in the Indonesian Archipelago
    A REVIEW OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATING EFFORTS AT CAVE AND ROCKSHELTER SITES IN THE INDONESIAN ARCHIPELAGO Hendri A. F. Kaharudin1,2, Alifah3, Lazuardi Ramadhan4 and Shimona Kealy2,5 1School of Archaeology and Anthropology, College of Arts and Social Sciences, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 2600, Australia 2Archaeology and Natural History Department, College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 2600 Australia 3Balai Arkeologi Yogyakarta, JL. Gedongkuning No. 174, Yogyakarta, Indonesia 4Departemen Arkeologi, Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, 55281 Indonesia 5ARC Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage, College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 2600 Australia Corresponding author: Hendri A. F. Kaharudin, [email protected] Keywords: initial occupation, Homo sapiens, Island Southeast Asia, Wallacea, absolute dating ABSTRACT ABSTRAK In the last 35 years Indonesia has seen a sub- Sejak 35 tahun terakhir, Indonesia mengalami stantial increase in the number of dated, cave peningkatan dalam usaha pertanggalan situs and rockshelter sites, from 10 to 99. Here we gua dan ceruk dari 10 ke 99. Di sini, kami review the published records of cave and meninjau ulang data gua dan ceruk yang telah rockshelter sites across the country to compile a dipublikasikan untuk menghimpun daftar yang complete list of dates for initial occupation at lengkap terkait jejak hunian tertua di setiap si- each site. All radiocarbon dates are calibrated tus. Kami melakukan kalibrasi terhadap setiap here for standardization, many of them for the pertanggalan radiocarbon sebagai bentuk first time in publication. Our results indicate a standardisasi. Beberapa di antaranya belum clear disparity in the distribution of dated ar- pernah dilakukan kalibrasi sebelumnya.
    [Show full text]
  • First Record of Avian Extinctions from the Late Pleistocene and Holocene of Timor Leste
    1 First record of avian extinctions from the Late Pleistocene and Holocene of Timor Leste 2 3 Hanneke J.M. Meijera,b, Julien Louysc,d and Sue O’Connord,e 4 5 a. University Museum of Bergen, Department of Natural History, University of Bergen, 6 Bergen, Norway, [email protected] 7 b. Human Origins Program, Department of Anthropology, National Museum of Natural 8 History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, United States of America 9 c. Australian Research Center for Human Evolution, Environmental Futures Research 10 Institute, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, [email protected] 11 d. Archaeology and Natural History, School of Culture, History and Language, College 12 of Asia and the Pacific, The Australian National University, Acton, ACT, Australia, 13 [email protected] 14 e. ARC Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity & Heritage, Acton, ACT, 2601, 15 Australia 16 17 Corresponding author: H.J.M. Meijer, [email protected] 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1 26 Abstract 27 28 Timor has yielded the earliest evidence for modern humans in Wallacea, but despite its 29 long history of modern human occupation, there is little evidence for human-induced Late 30 Pleistocene extinctions. Here, we report on Late Pleistocene and Holocene bird remains from 31 Jerimalai B and Matja Kuru 1, sites that have yielded extensive archaeological sequences 32 dating back to >40 ka. Avian remains are present throughout the sequence, and quails 33 (Phasianidae), buttonquails (Turnicidae) and pigeons (Columbidae) are the most abundant 34 groups. Taphonomic analyses suggest that the majority of bird remains, with the exception of 35 large-bodied pigeons, were accumulated by avian predators, likely the Barn owl Tyto sp.
    [Show full text]