Transnational Activism, Global Governance, and the EU
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Syllabus for the course on Transnational Activism, Global Governance, and the EU LUISS – MIPA and MES Instructor: Raffaele Marchetti [email protected] Academic Year: 2012/2013 This is a joint, but differentiated MIPA-MES course. MIPA students are required to attend sessions 1-5 (I term). MES students are required to attend sessions 1-10 (I and II term). Course Description: It is now widely recognised that global or transnational civil society plays a significant role in global governance. In the last 30 years, and especially after the end of the Cold War, the presence of civil society organisations (CSOs) in international affairs has become increasingly relevant. They have played a role in agenda setting, international law-making and governance, transnational diplomacy (tracks II and III), and the implementation and monitoring of a number of crucial global issues ranging from trade to development and poverty reduction, from democratic governance to human rights, from peace to the environment, and from security to the information society. CSOs have thus been significant international actors as advocates for policy solutions, service providers, knowledge brokers, or simply watchdogs and monitors of state and intergovernmental actions. This course is divided in two parts: the first part will examine the particular political constellation produced by the combination of institutional backing, socio-economic processes, technological innovation, and the dominance of a specific political ideology within which this global activism has taken place. The second part will examined more closely the relationship between CSOs and European institutions for what concerns the areas of global governance and peacebuilding. Course Methodology: Classes will consist primarily of seminar discussions, involving both short lectures by the professor and presentations by the students on the topics of the class. All students are expected to read the required literature of each seminar in advance and be ready to engage in a critical discussion with each other and with the instructor. Each seminar will be organized as follows: after the presentation by the instructor of the topic to be discussed, a group of 2-3 students is expected to 1 introduce the discussion, acting collectively as ‘discussion leader’. The discussion leaders will have to outline the main points of the readings thus highlighting questions for class’s discussion. One leader will present the strengths of the readings, the other the weaknesses. Critical remarks on the reading are always welcome. The first seminar, introduced by the instructor, will be used for clarifying the aims of the course and for assembling the discussion groups of the following seminars. Assessment: The students will be evaluated on the basis of class participation and a written assignment. The student will be expected to participate actively in class discussions, and must be able to discuss the main ideas presented in the required readings. Students will submit one jointly-written case study/strategy paper (2500 words). The paper will have to be submitted by January 4 th for MIPA students, and by June 7 th for MES students. The final evaluation will thus consist in the aggregation of the single assessments as the following: - Case Study/Strategy paper (60%) - Class presentation (20%) - Participation in class discussion (20%) ECTS grading Numerical grading in % Description (MES / MIPA) A+ 96 - 100 Outstanding A 91 - 95 Excellent A- 86 - 90 Very good B+ 81 - 85 Good B 76 - 80 B- 71 - 75 Satisfactory C+ 66 - 70 C 61 - 65 Pass C- 56 - 60 Resubmit D < 55 Fail 2 Course Schedule and Readings: Session 1 The Politics of Norm Change: Transnational Civil Society and Global Politics Required readings: Finnemore, M., and Sikkink, K. (1998) International Norms Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization 52 (4): 887-917. Price, R. (2003) 'Transnational Civil Society and Advocacy', World Politics 55 (4): 579-607. Tarrow, S. (2001) 'Transnational Politics: Contention and Institutions in International Politics', Annual Review of Political Science 4: 1-20. Recommended readings: Anheier, H., and Katz, H. (2005) Network Approach to Global Civil Society. In Helmut Anheier, Marlies Glasius and Mary Kaldor (eds.), Global Civil Society Yearbook 2004/5. London: Sage, pp. 206-221. Charnovitz, S. (1997). Two Centuries of Participation: NGOs and International Governance. Michigan Journal of International Law, 18 (2), 183-286. Meyer, J. W., Boli, J., Thomas, G., and Ramirez, F. (1997) World Society and the Nation State. American Journal of Sociology 103 (1): 144-181. Pianta, M., and Marchetti, R. (2007) The Global Justice Movements: The Transnational Dimension. In Donatella della Porta (ed.), The Global Justice Movement: A Cross-National and Transnational Perspective. Boulder, CO: Paradigm, pp. 29-51. Scholte, J. A. (2004) Civil Society and Democratically Accountable Global Governance. Government and Opposition 39 (2): 211-233. Tilly, C. (2001) 'Mechanisms in Political Processes', Annual Review of Political Science 4: 21-41. Session 2 Global Political Perspectives Required readings: Held, D., and McGrew, A. (2002) Globalization/Anti-Globalization . Cambridge: Polity, chapter 8. Marchetti, R. (2009) Mapping Alternative Models of Global Politics. International Studies Review 11 (1): 133-156. Recommended readings : Bhagwati, J. (2002). Coping With Anti-Globalization: A Trilogy of Discontents, Foreign Affairs , Vol. 81(1), Jan-Feb Chandler, David 2001. “The Road to Military Humanitarianism: How the Human Rights NGOs Shaped a New Humanitarian Agenda” Human Rights Quarterly 23 (3): 678-700. Hines, C. (2003) Time to Replace Globalization with Localization. In J. Michie .(ed.). The Handbook of Globalization . Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 395-402. Osterweil, M. (2005) 'Place-based Globalism: Theorizing the Global Justice Movement', Development 48 (2): 23-28. Starr, A., and Adams, J. (2003) Anti-Globalization: The Global Fight for Local Autonomy. New Political Science 25 (1): 19-42. 3 Steger, M. B., & Wilson, E. K. (2012). Anti-Globalization or Alter-Globalization? Mapping the Political Ideology of the Global Justice Movement. International Studies Quarterly, 52 (3), 439-454. Yanacopulos, H., & Smith, M. B. (2008). The Ambivalent Cosmopolitanism of International NGOs. In A. Bebbington, S. Hickey & D. Mitlin (Eds.), Can NGOs Make a Difference? The Challenge of Development Alternatives (pp. 298-315). London: Zed. Session 3 Cosmopolitan Campaigns Required readings : Glasius, M. (2002) Expertise in the Cause of Justice: Global Civil Society Influence on the Statute for an International Criminal Court, in H. Anheier, M. Glasius and M. Kaldor (eds.), Global Civil Society 2002 , Oxford: Oxford University Press, 137-168. Van Rooy, A. (1997). The Frontiers of Influence: NGO Lobbying at the 1974 World Food Conference, the 1992 Earth Summit and Beyond. World Development, 25 (1), 93-114. Recommended readings : Alcalde Villacampa, J..(forth.) International civil society initiatives on arms control. Global Policy Betsill, M. M. (2006). Transnational Actors in International Environmental Politics. In M. M. Betsill, K. Hochstetler & D. Stevis (Eds.), Palgrave Advances in International Environmental Politics (pp. 172-202). Basingstoke: Palgrave. Chen, M. A. (1995). Engendering World Conferences: The International Women’s Movement and the United Nations. Third World Quarterly, 16 , 477-493. Conca, K. (1995). Greening the United Nations: Environmental Organisations and the UN System. Third World Quarterly, 16 (3), 441-447. Donnelly, E. A. (2002) Proclaiming Jubilee: The Debt and Structural Adjustment Network. In Sanjeev Khagram, James V. Riker and Kathryn Sikkink (eds.), Restructuring World Politics: Transnational Social Movements, Networks and Norms. Minneapolis, WIS: university of Minnesota Press, pp. 155-180. Falk, R. (2005) Reforming the United Nations: Global Civil Society Perspectives and Initiatives, in Marlies Glasius, Mary Kaldor and Helmut Anheier (eds.), Global Civil Society 2005/6 , London: Sage, 150-186. Henry, L., Mohan, G., and Yanacopulos, H. (2004) Networks as Transnational Agents of Development. Third World Quarterly 25 (5): 839-855. Klotz, A. (2002). Transnational Activism and Global Transformations: The Anti-Apartheid and Abolitionist Experiences. European Journal of International Relations, 8 (1), 49-76. Pettifor, A. (1998). The Economic Bondage of Debt - and the Birth of a New Movement. New Left Review, 230 , 115-122. Tarrow, S. (2010) 'Outsiders Inside and Insiders Outside: Linking Transnational and Domestic Public Action for Human Rights', Human Rights Review 11 (2): 171-182. Wexler, L. (2003) 'The International Deployment of Shame, Second-Best Responses, and Norm Entrepreneurship: The Campaign to Ban Landmines and the Landmine Ban Treaty', Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law 20 (3): 561-605. 4 Session 4 Alter-globalist Campaigns Required readings : Della Porta, D., Alcalde, J., Parks, L., and Silva, F. (2010). 'The Effects of Transnational Protests: Some Reflections on 12 Protests Campaigns and More', paper presented at the Conference on Social Movement Outcomes, Geneve. Edelman, M. (2003) International Peasant and Farmers Movements and Networks. In Mary Kaldor, Helmut Anheier and Marlies Glasius (eds.), Global Civil Society 2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 185-220. Recommended readings : Bond, P. (2007) 'Linking below, across and against - World Social Forum weaknesses, global governance gaps and the global