Creativity at the Workplace

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Creativity at the Workplace The Law and Economics of Creativity at the Workplace ISSN 1045-6333 THE LAW AND ECONOMICS OF CREATIVITY IN THE WORKPLACE Barak Y. Orbach Discussion Paper No. 356 03/2002 Harvard Law School Cambridge, MA 02138 The Center for Law, Economics, and Business is supported by a grant from the John M. Olin Foundation. This paper can be downloaded without charge from: The Harvard John M. Olin Discussion Paper Series: http://www.law.harvard.edu/programs/olin_center/ The Law and Economics of Creativity at the Workplace JEL Classes K11, K19, P1 THE LAW AND ECONOMICS OF CREATIVITY AT THE WORKPLACE Barak Y. Orbach* (February, 2002) Abstract Technological and legal developments led to the rise of employed creativity in the last quarter of the nineteenth century. The new class of employers claimed the rights in the creative products produced by artists and inventors employed by it and after a short struggle its demands were satisfied: by and large the law acknowledges the rights of employers in creative products produced by workers (employees and contractors), just as it acknowledges the rights of employers in any other products. This legal victory, although took place almost a century ago, is still fiercely debated among scholars and participants in creative industries. In the past century, thousands of disputes between employers and workers over rights in creative products were brought before the courts and inspired voluminous commentary on the topic. Nonetheless, the study of the nature and structure of the law that allocates the rights between employers and workers has generally been neglected. This paper studies the organization of creativity at the workplace, presents a general framework for understanding the present allocation rules, evaluates these rules, and offers simple guidelines for designing better rules, when needed. The paper also examines the myths of the starving artist and the hero inventor and their inputs into the production of creative products. The paper concludes that the differences between the production of creative products and non-creative products do not call for unique allocation rules for the creative production. More specifically, I argue that the distinctive properties of creative workers and the characteristics of their employment do not justify workers’ ownership. * SJD Candidate and John M. Olin Fellow in Law, Economics & Business, Harvard Law School. For comments, conversations, and criticism I wish to thank Gabriella Blum, Louis Kaplow, Christine Jolls, and Manuel Trajtenberg. The financial support of the John M. Olin Center for Law, Economics & Business at Harvard Law School is gratefully acknowledged. The Law and Economics of Creativity at the Workplace I. Introduction......................................................................................................... 1 II. A Concise Overview of the History of Employed Creativity............................. 6 A. The First Reign of Employed Creativity ....................................................7 B. The Rise of Independent Creative Individuals ...........................................7 C. The (Second) Rise of Employed Creativity................................................9 III. The Legal Framework: A New Look at the Intellectual-Property Allocation Rules ................................................................................................................. 16 A. Generalizing Allocation Rules for the Different Branches of the Law .......16 B. The Allocation Rules and the Rule of Relative Contributions ...................17 1. Copyrights, Patents, and Trade Secrets .................................................................. 17 a) Bilateral Relations.............................................................................................18 b) Multilateral Relations.......................................................................................21 2. Trademarks, Trade Names, and Publicity Rights.................................................. 23 a) The Nature of the Protected Information......................................................23 b) The Allocation Rule...........................................................................................25 C. Copyright Law......................................................................................26 1. Overview...................................................................................................................... 26 2. The Basic Allocation Rules ...................................................................................... 28 3. Who is Considered an Employee?........................................................................... 35 4. Exceptions.................................................................................................................... 40 D. Patent Law............................................................................................43 1. The Basic Allocation Rules ...................................................................................... 43 2. The Rule of Relative Contributions......................................................................... 48 E. Trade Secret Law ..................................................................................50 F. Allocation Rules in Practice: Summary and Comparison ..........................55 1. Comparative Summary of the Allocation Rules ................................................... 55 2. Copyright vs. Patent and Trade-Secret Rules ........................................................ 56 3. The Unique Properties of Trade Secrets................................................................. 59 4. Open Questions........................................................................................................... 59 IV. The Organization of Creative Activities........................................................... 60 A. Creative Activities and Creative Products ...............................................61 B. The Players...........................................................................................63 1. Effort Suppliers ........................................................................................................... 63 a) Independent Individuals...................................................................................63 b) Employees and Contractors.............................................................................64 c) Humdrum and Creative Workers ....................................................................68 d) Desirable Legal Implications..........................................................................70 2. Capital Suppliers......................................................................................................... 73 a) Employers ...........................................................................................................73 b) Financiers...........................................................................................................76 c) Desirable Legal Implications...........................................................................78 C. Limited Specifiability, Discretionary Inputs, and Personhood ...................79 D. Creating by Learning.............................................................................86 1. The Humdrum Facet of Learning by Doing........................................................... 87 2. The Creative Facet of Learning by Doing.............................................................. 89 The Law and Economics of Creativity at the Workplace E. Incentives and the Progress of Science and Useful Arts............................92 1. Do Incentives Matter?................................................................................................ 93 a) The Question ......................................................................................................93 b) Incentives vs. Inner Necessity and Their Legal Implications.....................94 (1) Anecdotal Comments.................................................................................94 (2) Legal and Other Implications of Motivational Diversity....................97 c) Evidence..............................................................................................................99 (1) Arts ............................................................................................................ 100 (2) Science...................................................................................................... 106 2. Do Employers Provide Workers with Incentives?..............................................113 a) The Incentive Problem in Collaborative Production............................... 113 b) The Role of Market Forces in Assuring Good Incentive Systems .......... 115 V. Conclusions..................................................................................................... 118 The Law and Economics of Creativity at the Workplace 1 The Law and Economics of Creativity at the Workplace Barak Y. Orbach © 2002 Barak Y. Orbach. All Rights Reserved “Behold the turtle. He makes progress only when his neck is out. Let the creative employee stick out his neck.”1 I. Introduction Christopher Lydon was a longtime host of the popular radio talk show, The Connection, aired by the Boston public station WBUR-FM. Mr. Lydon sought to own equity in the show he developed and popularized and consequently lost his job as he agreed to nothing else, including fat salary increases.2 The fate of Petr
Recommended publications
  • P.C. Lauinger; Mary W
    GEORGETOWN Newsletter 23 August 1988 621b;;;; AsSOcldtes GEORGETOWN UNIVERSI1Y LIBRARY 37TH & 0 STREETS, NW WASHINGTON , D. C. 20057 P. C. Lauinger - the Passing of a Friend The Artist HimlHer Self It is with genuine sadness that we report the The late James Elder, rare book librarian at the death on February 20, 1988 of Mr. P. C. Law Library of the Library of Congress, system­ Lauinger, one of the library's staunchest sup­ atically collected fine art, principally prints and porters and a true gentleman in the best sense of drawings, for more than thirty years. He left a that word. P.c., as he was universally known, collection of more than 1,000 pieces at his death graduated from the College in 1922, and in 1981. Towards the end of his collecting career throughout his lifetime maintained a special he began to specialize in artists' self-portraits. affection for and dedication to his alma mater. His limited means dictated further specialization He served on the Board of Regents, the Univer­ on the work of living artists and on 20th century sity President's Council under Father Edward American and British printmakers. The library Bunn, S.J., and was appointed in 1968 one of has recently acquired, along with 58 other the first laymen to serve on the University's works, the 392 self-portraits comprising virtually Board of Directors. the entirety of Elder's collection in this field. In 1956 Mr. Lauinger was awarded the John Carroll Award, which the Alumni Association confers annually upon a distinguished alumnus/a in recognition of lifetime achievement and out­ standing service to Georgetown Univeristy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Creative Process
    The Creative Process THE SEARCH FOR AN AUDIO-VISUAL LANGUAGE AND STRUCTURE SECOND EDITION by John Howard Lawson Preface by Jay Leyda dol HILL AND WANG • NEW YORK www.johnhowardlawson.com Copyright © 1964, 1967 by John Howard Lawson All rights reserved Library of Congress catalog card number: 67-26852 Manufactured in the United States of America First edition September 1964 Second edition November 1967 www.johnhowardlawson.com To the Association of Film Makers of the U.S.S.R. and all its members, whose proud traditions and present achievements have been an inspiration in the preparation of this book www.johnhowardlawson.com Preface The masters of cinema moved at a leisurely pace, enjoyed giving generalized instruction, and loved to abandon themselves to reminis­ cence. They made it clear that they possessed certain magical secrets of their profession, but they mentioned them evasively. Now and then they made lofty artistic pronouncements, but they showed a more sincere interest in anecdotes about scenarios that were written on a cuff during a gay supper.... This might well be a description of Hollywood during any period of its cultivated silence on the matter of film-making. Actually, it is Leningrad in 1924, described by Grigori Kozintsev in his memoirs.1 It is so seldom that we are allowed to study the disclosures of a Hollywood film-maker about his medium that I cannot recall the last instance that preceded John Howard Lawson's book. There is no dearth of books about Hollywood, but when did any other book come from there that takes such articulate pride in the art that is-or was-made there? I have never understood exactly why the makers of American films felt it necessary to hide their methods and aims under blankets of coyness and anecdotes, the one as impenetrable as the other.
    [Show full text]
  • Moving Pictures: the History of Early Cinema by Brian Manley
    Discovery Guides Moving Pictures: The History of Early Cinema By Brian Manley Introduction The history of film cannot be credited to one individual as an oversimplification of any his- tory often tries to do. Each inventor added to the progress of other inventors, culminating in progress for the entire art and industry. Often masked in mystery and fable, the beginnings of film and the silent era of motion pictures are usually marked by a stigma of crudeness and naiveté, both on the audience's and filmmakers' parts. However, with the landmark depiction of a train hurtling toward and past the camera, the Lumière Brothers’ 1895 picture “La Sortie de l’Usine Lumière à Lyon” (“Workers Leaving the Lumière Factory”), was only one of a series of simultaneous artistic and technological breakthroughs that began to culminate at the end of the nineteenth century. These triumphs that began with the creation of a machine that captured moving images led to one of the most celebrated and distinctive art forms at the start of the 20th century. Audiences had already reveled in Magic Lantern, 1818, Musée des Arts et Métiers motion pictures through clever uses of slides http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Magic-lantern.jpg and mechanisms creating "moving photographs" with such 16th-century inventions as magic lanterns. These basic concepts, combined with trial and error and the desire of audiences across the world to see entertainment projected onto a large screen in front of them, birthed the movies. From the “actualities” of penny arcades, the idea of telling a story in order to draw larger crowds through the use of differing scenes began to formulate in the minds of early pioneers such as Georges Melies and Edwin S.
    [Show full text]
  • History-Of-The-Moving-Image-LIB-Pd
    tEl:T. n83 MASTERPIECES OF MOVINGIMAGE TECI{NOLOGY SEPTEMBER 10, 1988 _ MARCH 19, 1989 Descri ption! gf_fhq Objects in the Exhibition American Museum of the Moving lmage Edison KinetograPh Camera 1891 ln 1888, Thomas Edison set out to create "an instrument that does for the Eye what the phono- graph does for the Ear...." He assigned the project to one of his engineers, W.K.L. Dickson, who, after a series of false starts, completed the Kinetograph in 1891. The Kinetograph was the first motion picture camera to use the Eastman celluloid f ilm; this was a key breakthrough which made modern motion pic- tures possible. The camera photographed circular images one-half inch in diameter on perforated, f lexible strips of film which moved horizontally through a mechanized sprocket system' The prototype was cannibalized for laboratory use soon after completion, but was partially reconstructed in '1895-96 as evidence in a patent dispute. (Lent by the Edison National Historic Site) <Technician Charles H. Kayser posing with the Kinetograph in Edison's West Orange, New .lersey laboratory, c. 1891 . Edison KinetoscoPe 1894 To exploit his moving pictures commercially, Edison introduced the Kinetoscope, a "peep-show" viewer capable of presenting half-minute film shows. The machines were sold on a territory basis to showmen who installed them in arcades and Kinetoscope Parlors in all the major cities of America and Europe' Commercially, the Kinetoscope was a short-lived novelty, but its appearance directly inspired other inventors to find a way of projecting moving images onto a screen. (Reproduction made by A.
    [Show full text]
  • Hcotion Picture
    Philadelphia and the Qenesis of the <^hCotion Picture T is possible that a future Macauley will establish Philadelphia as the center of what, according to Sir Willmott Lewis,1 may I be called the Scientific Revolution. The influence of The Franklin Institute and the University of Pennsylvania, a growing industrial fabric, and the presence of a ready-money market for new enterprises were some of the factors in Philadelphia which stimulated an uncommonly large number of achievements within the field of applied science during the latter half of the nineteenth century. Among the scientific developments connected historically with Philadelphia, one of the foremost, measured by its profound impact upon latter-day social organization, is the motion picture. Even in the development of photography, the foundation of the motion picture, Philadelphia may lay claim to an impressive share of contributions: the bromine accelerator, discovered by Dr. Paul Beck Goddard, of the University of Pennsylvania faculty 32 the first daguerreotype portrait by Robert Cornelius;3 the vital experi- ments upon the gelatine dry plate made by John Carbutt;4 the first stereoscopic photographs on this side of the Atlantic, the work of two German immigrants, William and Frederick Langenheim.5 Philadelphia was also the fountain-head of important experi- mental work upon the magic lantern, which, in a sense, anticipated the motion picture. The brothers Langenheim, whose establishment was located in the Merchants' Exchange, Third and Walnut Streets, may be considered the fathers of the magic lantern trade in Phila- 1 Address at the University of Pennsylvania, Founder's Day, January 17, 1941.
    [Show full text]
  • Screendollars Newsletter 2021-04-26.Pdf
    Monday, April 26, 2021 | No. 165 One of the things moviegoers like most about going to theatres is seeing films on the Big Screen, "the way they were meant to be seen." What people don't realize is that when films started in the mid-1890s, there were neither screens nor projectors. The very short films of that era were meant to be seen individually by looking into peep show machines in arcades. Those Kinetoscope devices were one of many inventions from Thomas Edison's factory in West Orange, NJ. Since Edison was monetizing his Kinetoscopes quite well, he had no interest in developing a machine to project film images on walls. Others, however, saw a big future in showing films to groups of people. Peep show owners, in fact, were very vocal in pressing Edison to devise a Film projection to large audiences was much more way to show life size images on arcade walls. This led to the Vitascope profitable than viewing through individual kiosks, since projection system, developed by Washington, DC inventor Thomas Armat, fewer machines were needed in proportion to the but then marketed by Edison's organization as if it were his own invention. number of viewers - Click to Play The first public Vitascope screening took place April 23, 1896 at Koster & Biel's Music Hall, a vaudeville house in New York's Herald Square at 34th Street near Broadway, the site today of Macy's. It would have premiered three days earlier, but it took longer than expected to install the machinery. That first night audience was dazzled by film images projected on a 20 foot canvas screen set within a gilded frame.
    [Show full text]
  • Actuality Cinema in New York City, 1890S to C. 1905. Phd Thesis, University of Nottingham
    Walsh, John (2005) A Space and Time Machine: Actuality Cinema in New York City, 1890s to c. 1905. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham. Access from the University of Nottingham repository: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/10142/1/john-walsh-phd-thesis-2005.pdf Copyright and reuse: The Nottingham ePrints service makes this work by researchers of the University of Nottingham available open access under the following conditions. · Copyright and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. · To the extent reasonable and practicable the material made available in Nottingham ePrints has been checked for eligibility before being made available. · Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not- for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. · Quotations or similar reproductions must be sufficiently acknowledged. Please see our full end user licence at: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/end_user_agreement.pdf A note on versions: The version presented here may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher’s version. Please see the repository url above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription. For more information, please contact [email protected] A Space and Time Machine: Actuality Cinema in New York City, 1890s to c.
    [Show full text]
  • A Chronicle of the Motion Picture Industry a Chronicle of the Motion Picture Industry
    A CHRONICLE OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY A CHRONICLE OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY INTRODUCTION If you’ve ever taken a still photograph, you’re already acquainted with the essentials of shooting a motion picture image. The biggest diMerence between the two is that the movie camera typically captures twenty-four images each second. Well into the late Nineteenth Century, most images were captured on sensitized glass plates, metal, or heavy paper. Shortly after the invention of 1951 KODAK BROWNIE photography, attempts were already underway to capture and reproduce a Movie Camera moving image. Typically, an array of individual cameras, triggered in rapid succession, captured a series of single exposures on glass plates. These experiments relied on a persistence of vision concept—the eye-brain combination is capable of melding a series of sequential images into a movie. A more practical photographic system had yet to be created. It was George Eastman’s invention of the KODAK Camera, and the flexible film it exposed, that made the movie camera possible. A HISTORY OF CINEMATOGRAPHY Human fascination with the concept of communicating with light and shadows has its roots in antiquity. Aristotle supplied the earliest reference to the camera obscura—sunlight, passing through a small hole, projected an inverted image on the wall of a darkened room. Renaissance artists traced that projected image to create accurate drawings. Gemma Frisius published a drawing of a camera obscura in 1545. Thirteen years later Giovanni Battista della Porta wrote "Magia Naturalis," a book describing the use of a camera obscura with lenses and concave mirrors to project a tableau in a darkened room.
    [Show full text]
  • EDISON the Invention of the Movies
    Kino International Corp. presents EDISON The Invention of the Movies From the collections of The Museum of Modern Art & The Library of Congress A 4 Disc DVD set Curated by Steven Higgins, The Museum of Modern Art Charles Musser, Yale University Film Notes by Charles Musser Introduction Edison: Commercial motion pictures were invented at the Edison Laboratory between 1888 and 1893. They were actually a system of inventions: a camera, a viewing machine (the peep-hole kinetoscope), and equipment for printing, sprocket punching, and the developing of long strands of film. Perhaps none of these component parts was strictly new, but the ability of Edison and his staff to reorganize them for a specific purpose was an extraordinary technological and cultural achievement. Within a year, Edison had launched motion pictures as a commercial enterprise, remaining in the business until 1918––a 30 year involvement in motion pictures. During that period, the technical system underwent alteration and improvement: the development of the “Latham loop,” which enabled the system to handle large quantities of film; the introduction of projection; a reframing device for projectors so the film could be kept in frame; and the three-blade shutter, which reduced flicker during projection. Arguably more important was the cultural transformation of motion picture production: the shift in editorial control from exhibitor to production company and the concomitant creation of the filmmaker, the development of story films, the proliferation of specialized motion picture theaters (often called nickelodeons), and the eventual emergence and dominance of feature-length films. In 1894, Edison was the sole producer of motion pictures in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • The Library of Congress Information Bulletin, 2002. INSTITUTION Library of Congress, Washington, DC
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 478 305 IR 058 746 AUTHOR Lamolinara, Guy, Ed.; Dalrymple, Helen, Ed. TITLE The Library of Congress Information Bulletin, 2002. INSTITUTION Library of Congress, Washington, DC. ISSN ISSN-0041-7904 PUB DATE 2002-00-00 NOTE 318p.; For Volume 60 (2001 issues), see ED 464 636. AVAILABLE FROM For full text: http://www.loc.gov/loc/lcib/. PUB TYPE Collected Works Serials (022) JOURNAL CIT Library of Congress Information Bulletin; v61 n1-12 Jan-Dec 2002 EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF01/PC13 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Exhibits; Library Collection Development; *Library Collections; Library Materials; *Library Services; *National Libraries; United States History IDENTIFIERS *Library of Congress ABSTRACT These 10 issues, representing one calendar year, including two double issues (2002)- of "The Library of Congress Information Bulletin," contain information on Library of Congress new collections and program developments, lectures and readings, financial support and materials donations, budget, honors and awards, World Wide Web sites and digital collections, new publications, exhibits, and preservation. Cover stories include:(1) "American Women: Guide to Women's History Resources Published"; (2) "The Year in Review";(3) "'Suffering Under a Great Injustice': Adams' Photos Document. Japanese Internment";(4) "Presenting a Stage for a Nation: Exhibition Portrays Genius of Roger L. Stevens";(5) "Swann Gallery Exhibition Features 'American Beauties'";(6) "Veterans Hear the Call: Folklife Center Sponsors History Project"; (7) "Courting Disaster: Building a Collection to Chronicle 9/11 and Its Aftermath"; (8) "Collecting a Career: The Katherine Dunham Legacy Project"; (9) "2002 National Book Festival: Second Annual Event Celebrates the Power of Words"; and (10) "The Civil War and American Memory: Examining the Many Facets of the Conflict." (AEF) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document.
    [Show full text]
  • The Essential Reference Guide for Filmmakers
    THE ESSENTIAL REFERENCE GUIDE FOR FILMMAKERS IDEAS AND TECHNOLOGY IDEAS AND TECHNOLOGY AN INTRODUCTION TO THE ESSENTIAL REFERENCE GUIDE FOR FILMMAKERS Good films—those that e1ectively communicate the desired message—are the result of an almost magical blend of ideas and technological ingredients. And with an understanding of the tools and techniques available to the filmmaker, you can truly realize your vision. The “idea” ingredient is well documented, for beginner and professional alike. Books covering virtually all aspects of the aesthetics and mechanics of filmmaking abound—how to choose an appropriate film style, the importance of sound, how to write an e1ective film script, the basic elements of visual continuity, etc. Although equally important, becoming fluent with the technological aspects of filmmaking can be intimidating. With that in mind, we have produced this book, The Essential Reference Guide for Filmmakers. In it you will find technical information—about light meters, cameras, light, film selection, postproduction, and workflows—in an easy-to-read- and-apply format. Ours is a business that’s more than 100 years old, and from the beginning, Kodak has recognized that cinema is a form of artistic expression. Today’s cinematographers have at their disposal a variety of tools to assist them in manipulating and fine-tuning their images. And with all the changes taking place in film, digital, and hybrid technologies, you are involved with the entertainment industry at one of its most dynamic times. As you enter the exciting world of cinematography, remember that Kodak is an absolute treasure trove of information, and we are here to assist you in your journey.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis, Books Are Created and Madee by People, and Not Just Those Involved in the Writing
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Early Cinema and the Technological Imaginary Punt, M.J. Publication date 2000 Document Version Final published version Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Punt, M. J. (2000). Early Cinema and the Technological Imaginary. in eigen beheer. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:06 Oct 2021 Early y Cinema a andd the Technological l Imaginary y Michaell Punt EarlyEarly Cinema and the Technological Imaginary Academischh Proefschrift terr verkrijging van de graad van doctor aann de Universiteit van Amsterdam, op gezag van de Rector Magnificus prof.. dr. J.J.M. Franse tenn overstaan van een door het college voor promoties ingestelde commissiee in het openbaar te verdedigen in de Aula der Universiteit opp vrijdag 19 mei 2000 te 12.00 uur door r Michaell Punt geborenn te Londen FACULTEITT DER GEESTESWETENSCHAPPEN Promotor: : Prof.
    [Show full text]