Fishes of Sahul Volume and Author Index.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fishes of Sahul Volume and Author Index.Pdf FISHES OF SAHUL Issue Index Volume 33(4) 2019 (December) Hammer, M. 2019. One becomes three: research behind the naming of two new dwarf rainbowfishes in the Melanotaenia maccullochi species complex. Fishes of Sahul 33(4) , 1492–1500. Amick, P.K. 2019. The Himalayan Snow Trout ( Schizothorax richardsonii ) is doing the unintended in Papua New Guinean rivers. Fishes of Sahul 33(4) , 1501– 1508. Shoesmith, D, Romanowksi, N., Briggs, G., Unmack, P.J. & Scharpf, C. 2019. Fish in focus: Spotted Galaxias Galaxias truttaceus (Galaxiidae). Fishes of Sahul 33(4) , 1509–1518. Volume 33(3) 2019 (September) Lenegan, J. 2019. Cairns to Weipa and back, through a new lens: the Gobioides. Part 1. Fishes of Sahul 33(3) , 1447–1483. Tappin, A.R. Briggs, G., Stanton, M., Unmack, P.J. & Scharpf, C. 2019. Fish in focus: Pygmy Rainbowfish Melanotaenia pygmaea (Melanotaeniidae). Fishes of Sahul 33(3), 1484–1490. Volume 33(2) 2019 (June) Martin, K. & Barclay, S. 2019. McCulloch’s Rainbowfish Melanotaenia maccullochi (Melanotaeniidae) in the Queensland Wet Tropics. Fishes of Sahul 33(2), 1404–1416. Scharpf, C. 2019. Fishes of Sahul: an etymological survey (part 2). Fishes of Sahul 33(2), 1417–1439. Lamin, C., Unmack, P.J. & Scharpf, C. 2019. Fish in foscus: Western Pygmy Perch Nannoperca vittata (Percichthyidae). Fishes of Sahul 33(2), 1440–1446. Volume 33(1) 2019 (March) Tappin, A.R. & O’Reilly 2019. Radical Rhads, the amazing Ornate Rainbowfish!. Fishes of Sahul 33(1), 1362–1402. Volume 32(4) 2018 (December) Graf, J. & Lange, G. 2018. Another trip to West Papua. Fishes of Sahul 32(4), 1336– 1349. Martin, K. 2018. The Cairns Rainbowfish Cairnsichthys rhombosomoides (Melanotaeniidae): distribution patterns and conservation status. Fishes of Sahul 32(4), 1350–1357. Blake, R. 2018. Hermaphroditism or plain male? Two apparent female Eastern Rainbowfish Melanotaenia splendida splendida producing fry. Fishes of Sahul 32(4), 1358–1360. Volume 32(3) 2018 (September) Hammer, M. & Duguid. A. 2018. Fishes in Australia’s Red Centre. Fishes of Sahul 32(3) , 1282–1302. Unmack, P.J. 2018. Rains of fishes: real or myth in Outback Australia? Fishes of Sahul 32(3), 1303–1305. Mossop, K. & Moran, N. 2018. Surviving in the desert: how behaviour enables the Desert Goby to persist. Fishes of Sahul 32(3), 1306–1315. Kerezsy, A. 2018. Where had they come from? Understanding fish migrations in a desert river. Fishes of Sahul 32(3), 1316–1323. Briggs, G., Unmack, P.J., Hammer, M. & Scharpf, C. 2018. Fish in focus: Central Australian Mogurnda species (Eleotridae). Fishes of Sahul 32(3), 1324–1334. Volume 32(2) 2018 (June) Scharpf, C. 2018. Fishes of Sahul: an etymological survey (part 1). Fishes of Sahul 32(2), 1248–1260. Martin, K. & Barclay, S. 2018. The story of the Daintree Rainbowfish ( Cairnsichthys bitaeniatus ), Australia’s newest rainbowfish species. Fishes of Sahul 32(2), 1261–1270. Briggs, G., Sambell, B., Wilson, D., Martin, K. & Hansen, B. & Scharpf, C. 2018. Fish in foscus: Seven-spot Archerfish Toxotes chatareus (Toxotidae). Fishes of Sahul 32(2), 1271–1280. Volume 32(1) 2018 (March) Shoesmith, D. 2018. An ANGFA insight into the freshwater fishes of New Zealand. Fishes of Sahul 32(1), 1214–1224. Inbun, B.Y. & Smith, P.T. 2018. Recent developments at Lake Kutubu: impacts on the fish and the Foe people. Fishes of Sahul 32(1), 1225–1239. Wilson, D., Hammer, M. & Scharpf, C. 2018. Fish in focus: Wilson’s Mangrovegoby Mugilogobius wilsoni (Gobiidae). Fishes of Sahul 32(1), 1240–1246. Volume 31(4) 2017 (December) Tappin, A.R. 2017. Breeding Threadfin Rainbowfish Iriatherina werneri (Melanotaeniidae). Fishes of Sahul 31(4), 1182–1188. Moy, K.G. & Unmack, P.J. 2017. Update on saving the Running River Rainbowfish – new populations established and going well!. Fishes of Sahul 31(4), 1189– 1197. Lamin, C. 2017. Breeding Flinders Pygmy Perch Nannoperca “flindersi” (Percichthyidae). Fishes of Sahul 31(4), 1198–1204. Briggs, G., Unmack, P.J., Stanton, M. & Scharpf, C. 2017. Fish in focus: Marjorie’s Hardyhead Craterocephalus marjoriae (Atherinidae). Fishes of Sahul 31(4), 1205–1211. Volume 31(3) 2017 (September) Tustin, D. 2017. The lost Rainbowfish – Melanotaenia corona (Melanotaeniidae). Fishes of Sahul 31(3) , 1143–1161. Martin, K. 2017. Translocated rainbowfishes (Melanotaeniidae) and blue-eyes (Pseudomugilidae) in the Queensland Wet Tropics. Fishes of Sahul 31(3), 1162–1174. Lenagan, J., Unmack, P.J., Hansen, B. & Scharpf, C. 2017. Fish in focus: Peacock Gudgeon Tateurndina ocellicauda (Eleotridae). Fishes of Sahul 31(3), 1175– 1180. Volume 31(2) 2017 (June) Martin, K. & Barclay, S. 2017. Factors influencing distribution and form of the Utchee Rainbowfish Melanotaenia utcheensis (Melanotaeniidae). Fishes of Sahul 31(2), 1095–1117. Fauth, S. 2017. Husbandry and captive breeding of Mouth Almighty Glossamia aprion (Apogonidae). Fishes of Sahul 31(2), 1118–1122. Tappin, A., Unmack, P.J., O’Reilly, L., Briggs, G., Hansen, B., Stanton, M. & Scharpf, C. 2017. Fish in foscus: Crimson-spotted Rainbowfish Melanotaenia duboulayi (Melanotaeniidae). Fishes of Sahul 31(2), 1123–1141. Volume 31(1) 2017 (March) Kerezsy, A. 2017. Invasion complete: the quick march of Sleepy Cod through the Cooper Creek catchment in central Australia. Fishes of Sahul 31(1), 1067– 1072. Lange, G. & Graf, J. 2017. The discovery of Melanotaenia garylangei – the Golden Rainbowfish from Dekai. Fishes of Sahul 31(1), 1073–1078. Lange, G. & Graf, J. 2017. Keeping and raising Melanotaenia garylangei – the Golden Rainbowfish from Dekai. Fishes of Sahul 31(1), 1079–1080. Unmack, P.J., Sambell, B., Wilson, D., Lach, M. & Scharpf, C. 2017. Fish in focus: Hyrtl’s Catfish Neosilurus hyrtlii (Plotosidae). Fishes of Sahul 31(1), 1081– 1093. Volume 30(4) 2016 (December) Unmack, P.J., Martin, K.C., Hammer, M.P., Ebner, B., Moy, K. & Brown C. 2016. Malanda Gold: the tale of a unique rainbowfish from the Atherton Tablelands, now on the verge of extinction. Fishes of Sahul 30(4), 1039–1054. Romanowski, N. 2016. Reticulated Freshwater Pipefish ( Hippichthys heptogonus ) and others. Fishes of Sahul 30(4), 1055-1060. Moores, G., Lenagan, J., Unmack, P.J., Martin, K.C. & Scharpf, C. 2016. Fish in focus: Snakehead Gudgeon Giuris margaritacea (Eleotridae). Fishes of Sahul 30(4), 1061-1066. Volume 30(3) 2016 (September) Thierbach, B. 2016. Empire Gudgeon: one more breeding attempt. Fishes of Sahul 30(3) , 1010–1014. Martin, K. 2016. Black-banded Rainbowfish ( Melanotaenia nigrans ) in the Queensland Wet Tropics – a failed translocation? Fishes of Sahul 30(3), 1015–1020. Wager, R.N.E. 2016. First successful rearing of Hypseleotris compressa larvae in aquaria. A long lost article by Rob Wager (written circa 1991) with annotations added 2016. Fishes of Sahul 30(3), 1021–1024. Unmack, P.J. 2016. Update on saving Running River Rainbowfish. Fishes of Sahul 30(3), 1025–1032. Unmack, P.J., Hansen, B., Briggs, G., Stanton, M., Scharpf, C. & Gill, A. 2016. Fish in focus: Empire Gudgeon Hypseleotris compressa (Eleotridae). Fishes of Sahul 30(3), 1033–1037. Volume 30(2) 2016 (June) Graf, J. & Lange, G. 2016. Discovering Melanotaenia bowmani and Melanotaenia grunwaldi . Fishes of Sahul 30(2), 980–988. Hansen, B. & Constable, R. 2016. Blue-eye diversity in Australia, including new distribution locality records with a focus on Torres Strait Islands. Fishes of Sahul 30(2), 989–996. Romanowski, N. 2016. Giant water beetles and water tigers: serious predators on a small scale. Fishes of Sahul 30(2), 997–1001. Tappin, A., Briggs, G., Wilson, D. & Scharpf, C. 2016. Fish in focus: Blackmast Craterocephalus stramineus (Atherinidae). Fishes of Sahul 30(2), 1002–1008. Volume 30(1) 2016 (March) Eisemberg, C.C. & Berra, T.M. 2016. Fish species sold in the Kikori market, Papua New Guinea, with reference to the nurseryfish, Kurtus gulliveri (Perciformes: Kurtidae). Fishes of Sahul 30(1), 942–949. Allen, G.R., Unmack, P.J. & Hadiaty, R.K. 2016. Pseudomugil luminatus , a new species of blue-eye (Teleostei: Pseudomugilidae) from southern New Guinea, with notes on P. gertrudae. Fishes of Sahul 30(1), 950–961. Martin, K.C. & Barclay, S. 2016. A review of the distribution and status of ‘Burdekin rainbowfish’ populations in north Queensland. Fishes of Sahul 30(1), 962–972. Briggs, G., Sambell, B., Hansen, B. & Scharpf, C. 2016. Fish in focus: coal grunter Hephaestus carbo . Fishes of Sahul 30(1), 973–978. Volume 29(4) 2015 (December) Roberts, D. 2015. What is the future of the critically endangered Elizabeth Springs goby? Fishes of Sahul 29(4), 922–933. Unmack, P.J. and Hammer, M.P. 2015. Burdekin rainbowfish on the verge of disappearing from Running River! Fishes of Sahul 29(4), 933–937. Shoesmith, D. 2015. Unusual coloured Galaxias . Fishes of Sahul 29(4), 937-940. Volume 29(3) 2015 (September) Allen, G.R. 2015. In the footsteps of Wallace: 2013 Aru Islands expedition. Fishes of Sahul 29(3), 894–903. Briggs, G. 2015. A quick trip for rhads (ornate rainbowfish). Fishes of Sahul 29(3), 904–913. Tustin, D.P.S. 2015. Melanotaenia of New Guinea and the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (continued from Vol. 29 No. 2). Fishes of Sahul 29(3), 913–920. Volume 29(2) 2015 (June) Graf, J., Herder, F. and Hadiaty, R.K. 2015. A new species of rainbowfish (Melanotaeniidae), Melanotaenia garylangei , from western New Guinea (Papua Province, Indonesia). Fishes of Sahul 29(2), 870–881. O’Reilly, L. 2015. Breeding the honey blue-eye ( Pseudomugil mellis). Fishes of Sahul 29(2), 882–887. Tustin, D.P.S. 2015. Melanotaenia of New Guinea and the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (continued). Fishes of Sahul 29(2), 888–892. Volume 29(1) 2015 (March) Allen, G.R., Unmack, P.J. and Hadiaty, R.K. 2015. Melanotaenia rubrivittata , a new species of rainbowfish (Melanotaeniidae) from northwestern Papua Province, Indonesia.
Recommended publications
  • §4-71-6.5 LIST of CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November
    §4-71-6.5 LIST OF CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November 28, 2006 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME INVERTEBRATES PHYLUM Annelida CLASS Oligochaeta ORDER Plesiopora FAMILY Tubificidae Tubifex (all species in genus) worm, tubifex PHYLUM Arthropoda CLASS Crustacea ORDER Anostraca FAMILY Artemiidae Artemia (all species in genus) shrimp, brine ORDER Cladocera FAMILY Daphnidae Daphnia (all species in genus) flea, water ORDER Decapoda FAMILY Atelecyclidae Erimacrus isenbeckii crab, horsehair FAMILY Cancridae Cancer antennarius crab, California rock Cancer anthonyi crab, yellowstone Cancer borealis crab, Jonah Cancer magister crab, dungeness Cancer productus crab, rock (red) FAMILY Geryonidae Geryon affinis crab, golden FAMILY Lithodidae Paralithodes camtschatica crab, Alaskan king FAMILY Majidae Chionocetes bairdi crab, snow Chionocetes opilio crab, snow 1 CONDITIONAL ANIMAL LIST §4-71-6.5 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Chionocetes tanneri crab, snow FAMILY Nephropidae Homarus (all species in genus) lobster, true FAMILY Palaemonidae Macrobrachium lar shrimp, freshwater Macrobrachium rosenbergi prawn, giant long-legged FAMILY Palinuridae Jasus (all species in genus) crayfish, saltwater; lobster Panulirus argus lobster, Atlantic spiny Panulirus longipes femoristriga crayfish, saltwater Panulirus pencillatus lobster, spiny FAMILY Portunidae Callinectes sapidus crab, blue Scylla serrata crab, Samoan; serrate, swimming FAMILY Raninidae Ranina ranina crab, spanner; red frog, Hawaiian CLASS Insecta ORDER Coleoptera FAMILY Tenebrionidae Tenebrio molitor mealworm,
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Ornamental Fish Commonly Cultured in Florida 1 Jeffrey E
    Circular 54 Freshwater Ornamental Fish Commonly Cultured in Florida 1 Jeffrey E. Hill and Roy P.E. Yanong2 Introduction Unlike many traditional agriculture industries in Florida which may raise one or only a few different species, tropical Freshwater tropical ornamental fish culture is the largest fish farmers collectively culture hundreds of different component of aquaculture in the State of Florida and ac- species and varieties of fishes from numerous families and counts for approximately 95% of all ornamentals produced several geographic regions. There is much variation within in the US. There are about 200 Florida producers who and among fish groups with regard to acceptable water collectively raise over 800 varieties of freshwater fishes. In quality parameters, feeding and nutrition, and mode of 2003 alone, farm-gate value of Florida-raised tropical fish reproduction. Some farms specialize in one or a few fish was about US$47.2 million. Given the additional economic groups, while other farms produce a wide spectrum of effects of tropical fish trade such as support industries, aquatic livestock. wholesalers, retail pet stores, and aquarium product manufacturing, the importance to Florida is tremendous. Fish can be grouped in a number of different ways. One major division in the industry which has practical signifi- Florida’s tropical ornamental aquaculture industry is cance is that between egg-laying species and live-bearing concentrated in Hillsborough, Polk, and Miami-Dade species. The culture practices for each division are different, counties with additional farms throughout the southern requiring specialized knowledge and equipment to succeed. half of the state. Historic factors, warm climate, the proxim- ity to airports and other infrastructural considerations This publication briefly reviews the more common groups (ready access to aquaculture equipment, supplies, feed, etc.) of freshwater tropical ornamental fishes cultured in Florida are the major reasons for this distribution.
    [Show full text]
  • Reintroduction Plan for the Purple- Spotted Gudgeon in the Southern Murray–Darling Basin
    Reintroduction plan for the Purple- spotted Gudgeon in the southern Murray–Darling Basin Photo: Arthur Mostead Authors - Michael Hammer, Thomas Barnes, Leanne Piller & Dylan Sortino Aquasave Consultants, Adelaide Published by Murray–Darling Basin Authority. MDBA Publication No 45/12 ISBN 978-1-922068-54-5 (online) © Murray–Darling Basin Authority for and on behalf of the Commonwealth of Australia, 2012. With the exception of the Commonwealth Coat of Arms, the MDBA logo, all photographs, graphics and trademarks, this publication is provided under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au The MDBA’s preference is that you attribute this publication (and any material sourced from it) using the following wording: Title: Reintroduction Plan for the Southern Purple-spotted Gudgeon in the southern Murray— Darling Basin Source: Licensed from the Murray–Darling Basin Authority, under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence. Authors: Michael Hammer, Thomas Barnes, Leanne Pillar and Dylan Sortino. Editor: Jane Tuckwell The MDBA provides this information in good faith but to the extent permitted by law, the MDBA and the Commonwealth exclude all liability for adverse consequences arising directly or indirectly from using any information or material contained within this publication. Cover Image: Lower Murray Southern Purple-spotted Gudgeon in captivity–adults, eggs and juveniles. Photos by Michael Hammer i Reintroduction plan for the Southern Purple-spotted Gudgeon in the southern Murray—Darling Basin. Summary The Southern Purple-spotted Gudgeon is a small, colourful freshwater fish with a distinct genetic conservation unit in the southern Murray–Darling Basin (MDB).
    [Show full text]
  • Crater Lakes National Park Management Statement 2013
    Crater Lakes National Park Management Statement 2013 Legislative framework Park size: 974ha a Nature Conservation Act 1992 Bioregion: Wet Tropics a Environment Protection Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cwlth) QPWS region: Northern a Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003 a Wet Tropics World Heritage Protection and Local government Tablelands Regional Management Act 1993 estate/area: Council a Native Title Act 1993 (Cwlth) State electorate: Dalrymple Plans and agreements a Wet Tropics of Queensland World Heritage Area Regional Agreement 2005 a Bonn Agreement a China–Australia Migratory Bird Agreement a Japan–Australia Migratory Bird Agreement a Republic of Korea–Australia Migratory Bird Agreement a Recovery plan for the stream-dwelling rainforest frogs of the Wet Tropics biogeography region of north-east Queensland 2000–2004 a Recovery plan for the southern cassowary Casuarius casuarius johnsonii a National recovery plan for the spectacled flying fox Pteropus conspicillatus Lake Eacham. Photo: Tourism Queensland. a National recovery plan for cave-dwelling bats, Rhinolophus philippinensis, Hipposideros semoni and Taphozous troughtoni 2001–2005 a Draft recovery plan for the spotted-tail quoll (northern sub-species) Dasyurus maculatus gracilis Thematic strategies a Level 2 Fire Strategy a Level 2 Pest Strategy Crater Lakes National Park Management Statement 2013 Vision Crater Lakes National Park continues to protect the unique scenic qualities of the lakes and surrounding rainforest, and the many species of conservation significance that occur there. Crater Lakes National Park continues to be a premier site for tourism, recreation, education and research. It showcases outstanding natural values. Easy vehicular access is provided for park users. Conservation purpose Crater Lakes National Park was formed by the amalgamation of Lake Eacham National Park and Lake Barrine National Park in 1994.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships and Historical Biogeography of Melanotaeniid Fishes in Australia and New Guinea
    Mar. Freshwater Res., 2000, 51, 713–23 Phylogenetic relationships and historical biogeography of melanotaeniid fishes in Australia and New Guinea K. McGuiganA, D. ZhuA, G. R. AllenB and C. MoritzA ACooperative Research Centre for Tropical Rainforest Ecology and Management, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia. email: [email protected] BWest Australian Museum, Francis Street, Perth 6009, Western Australia, Australia Abstract. Phylogenetic analysis of melanotaeniid mtDNA cytochrome b and tRNAPro-control region sequence is broadly consistent with the current taxonomy. However, the molecular phylogeny supports the elevation of M. s. australis to full species status and indicates either that it is a composite species or has introgressed with sym- patric Melanotaenia species. Phenotypically cryptic mtDNA diversity in north-eastern Australia possibly represents an undescribed species. Six major monophyletic clades present in the phylogeny were strongly supported by mor- phological data. The clades represent three biogeographic regions. Fish from northern New Guinea form a mono- phyletic clade, within which Melanotaenia and Glossolepis are polyphyletic. The divergence of this clade from those in southern New Guinea is consistent with the final uplift of the Central Highlands 5 million years BP. North-western New Guinea and associated islands represent another highly divergent, monophyletic clade of a similar age to that in northern New Guinea. The remaining four clades form a monophyletic assemblage restricted to southern New Guinea and Australia: one in northern Australia, one with a disjunct distribution in north-western and eastern Australia, one widespread throughout Australia and southern New Guinea, and one in southern New Guinea with an outlying species in northern Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Prosanta Chakrabarty
    Prosanta Chakrabarty Museum of Natural Science, Dept. of Bio. Sci., 119 Foster Hall, Louisiana State University Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA Office (225) 578-3079 | Fax: (225) 578-3075 e-mail: [email protected] webpage: http://www.prosanta.net EDUCATION 2006 Doctor of Philosophy in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Dissertation: "Phylogenetic and Biogeographic Analyses of Greater Antillean and Middle American Cichlidae." 2000 Bachelor of Science in Applied Zoology, McGill University, Montréal, Québec. RECENT RESEARCH AND ADMINISTRATIVE POSITIONS 2014 – Present Associate Professor/Curator of Fishes, Louisiana State University, Department of Biological Sciences, Museum of Natural Science, LA. 2016 - Present Research Associate National Museum of Natural History Smithsonian, Washington, D.C. 2012 - Present Research Associate, Division of Vertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, NY. 2016 - 2017 Program Director for National Science Foundation (Visiting Scientist, Engineer Program), Systematics and Biodiversity Sciences Cluster in the Division of Environmental Biology, Directorate for Biological Sciences, VA. 2008 - 2014 Assistant Professor/Curator of Fishes, Louisiana State University, Department of Biological Sciences, Museum of Natural Science, LA. 2006 - 2008 Postdoctoral Fellow, American Museum of Natural History, Department of Ichthyology, NY. MAJOR GRANTS AND FELLOWSHIPS Over $2 million total as PI • NSF DEB: Collaborative Research: Not so Fast - Historical biogeography of freshwater fishes in Central America and the Greater Antilles, 2014-2019. • NSF IOS: Research Opportunity, 2018. • NSF: CSBR: Imminent and Critical Integration and Renovations to Herps and Fishes at the LSU Museum of Natural Science, 2016-2019. • National Academies Keck Futures Initiative: Crude Life: A Citizen Art and Science Investigation of Gulf of Mexico Biodiversity after the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill, 2016-2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes of the King Edward River in the Kimberley Region, Western Australia
    Records of the Western Australian Museum 25: 351–368 (2010). Fishes of the King Edward River in the Kimberley region, Western Australia David L. Morgan Freshwater Fish Group, Centre for Fish and Fisheries Research, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract – The King Edward River, in the far north of the Kimberley region of Western Australia drains approximately 10,000 km2 and discharges into the Timor Sea near the town of Kalumburu. This study represents an ichthyological survey of the river’s freshwaters and revealed that the number of freshwater fishes of the King Edward River is higher than has previously been recorded for a Western Australian river. Twenty-six strictly freshwater fish species were recorded, which is three species higher than the much larger Fitzroy River in the southern Kimberley. The study also identified a number of range extensions, including Butler’s Grunter and Shovel-nosed Catfish to the west, and the Slender Gudgeon to the north and east. A possibly undescribed species of glassfish, that differs morphologically from described species in arrangement of head spines, fin rays, as well as relative body measurements, is reported. A considerable proportion of Jenkins’ Grunter, which is widespread throughout the system but essentially restricted to main channel sites, had ‘blubber-lips’. There were significant differences in the prevailing fish fauna of the different reaches of the King Edward River system. Thus fish associations in the upper King Edward River main channel were significantly different to those in the tributaries and the main channel of the Carson River.
    [Show full text]
  • Lakes Argyle and Kununurra Wetlands Ramsar Site Ecological Character Description
    Lakes Argyle and Kununurra Ramsar Site Ecological Character Description Citation: Hale, J. and Morgan, D., 2010, Ecological Character Description for the Lakes Argyle and Kununurra Ramsar Site. Report to the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, Canberra. Acknowledgements: Danny Rogers, Australasian Waders Studies Group (expert advice) Halina Kobryn, Murdoch University (mapping and GIS) The steering committee was comprised of representatives of the following organisations: • Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts • WA Department of Environment and Conservation (Kununurra) • WA Department of Water (Kununurra) • Shire of Wyndham East Kimberley Introductory Notes This Ecological Character Description (ECD Publication) has been prepared in accordance with the National Framework and Guidance for Describing the Ecological Character of Australia’s Ramsar Wetlands (National Framework) (Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, 2008). The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) prohibits actions that are likely to have a significant impact on the ecological character of a Ramsar wetland unless the Commonwealth Environment Minister has approved the taking of the action, or some other provision in the EPBC Act allows the action to be taken. The information in this ECD Publication does not indicate any commitment to a particular course of action, policy position or decision. Further, it does not provide assessment of any particular action within the meaning of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth), nor replace the role of the Minister or his delegate in making an informed decision to approve an action. The Water Act 2007 requires that in preparing the [Murray-Darling] Basin Plan, the Murray Darling Basin Authority (MDBA) must take into account Ecological Character Descriptions of declared Ramsar wetlands prepared in accordance with the National Framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Venom Evolution Widespread in Fishes: a Phylogenetic Road Map for the Bioprospecting of Piscine Venoms
    Journal of Heredity 2006:97(3):206–217 ª The American Genetic Association. 2006. All rights reserved. doi:10.1093/jhered/esj034 For permissions, please email: [email protected]. Advance Access publication June 1, 2006 Venom Evolution Widespread in Fishes: A Phylogenetic Road Map for the Bioprospecting of Piscine Venoms WILLIAM LEO SMITH AND WARD C. WHEELER From the Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Environmental Biology, Columbia University, 1200 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY 10027 (Leo Smith); Division of Vertebrate Zoology (Ichthyology), American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024-5192 (Leo Smith); and Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024-5192 (Wheeler). Address correspondence to W. L. Smith at the address above, or e-mail: [email protected]. Abstract Knowledge of evolutionary relationships or phylogeny allows for effective predictions about the unstudied characteristics of species. These include the presence and biological activity of an organism’s venoms. To date, most venom bioprospecting has focused on snakes, resulting in six stroke and cancer treatment drugs that are nearing U.S. Food and Drug Administration review. Fishes, however, with thousands of venoms, represent an untapped resource of natural products. The first step in- volved in the efficient bioprospecting of these compounds is a phylogeny of venomous fishes. Here, we show the results of such an analysis and provide the first explicit suborder-level phylogeny for spiny-rayed fishes. The results, based on ;1.1 million aligned base pairs, suggest that, in contrast to previous estimates of 200 venomous fishes, .1,200 fishes in 12 clades should be presumed venomous.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Fish Strategy
    MURRAY-DARLING BASIN AUTHORITY Native Fish Strategy Mesoscale movements of small- and medium-sized fish in the Murray-Darling Basin MURRAY-DARLING BASIN AUTHORITY Native Fish Strategy Mesoscale movements of small- and medium-sized fish in the Murray-Darling Basin M. Hutchison, A. Butcher, J. Kirkwood, D. Mayer, K. Chilcott and S. Backhouse Queensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries Published by Murray-Darling Basin Commission Postal Address GPO Box 409, Canberra ACT 2601 Office location Level 4, 51 Allara Street, Canberra City Australian Capital Territory Telephone (02) 6279 0100 international + 61 2 6279 0100 Facsimile (02) 6248 8053 international + 61 2 6248 8053 Email [email protected] Internet http://www.mdbc.gov.au For further information contact the Murray-Darling Basin Commission office on (02) 6279 0100 This report may be cited as: Hutchison, M, Butcher, A, Kirkwood, J, Mayer, D, Chikott, K and Backhouse, S. Mesoscale movements of small and medium-sized fish in the Murray-Darling Basin MDBC Publication No. 41/08 ISBN 978 1 921257 81 0 © Copyright Murray-Darling Basin Commission 2008 This work is copyright. Graphical and textual information in the work (with the exception of photographs and the MDBC logo) may be stored, retrieved and reproduced in whole or in part, provided the information is not sold or used for commercial benefit and is acknowledged. Such reproduction includes fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968. Reproduction for other purposes is prohibited without prior permission of the Murray-Darling Basin Commission or the individual photographers and artists with whom copyright applies.
    [Show full text]
  • Hatching Success of Rainbowfish Eggs Following Exposure to Air
    WellBeing International WBI Studies Repository 2014 Hatching Success of Rainbowfish ggsE Following Exposure to Air Lois J. Oulton Macquarie University Penelope Carbia Macquarie University Culum Brown Macquarie University Follow this and additional works at: https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/acwp_aff Part of the Animal Studies Commons, Behavior and Ethology Commons, and the Comparative Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Oulton, L., Carbia, P., & Brown, C. (2014). Hatching success of rainbowfish eggs following exposure to air. Australian Journal of Zoology, 61(5), 395-398. This material is brought to you for free and open access by WellBeing International. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of the WBI Studies Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Hatching success of rainbowfish eggs following exposure to air Lois Oulton, Penelope Carbia, and Culum Brown Macquarie University KEYWORDS egg desiccation, Lake Eacham, Melanotaenia, translocation ABSTRACT Translocation of fishes within and between drainage basins is widely recognised as a threatening process to Australian native fishes. While many translocations are deliberate, for example for fisheries enhancement, it is possible that translocation can occur naturally. In the Wet Tropic region of Australia, the widespread eastern rainbowfish, Melanotaenia splendida, has begun to colonise the Atherton tablelands. This is of particular concern because the area is home to several endangered endemic species such as the Lake Eacham rainbowfish, M. eachamensis, and its allies. It is likely that some of the translocations have occurred through the use of this species as bait, but the recent invasion of Lake Eacham may have occurred naturally via the movement of eggs between nearby streams running into Lake Tinaroo.
    [Show full text]
  • 5Th Indo-Pacific Fish Conference
    )tn Judo - Pacifi~ Fish Conference oun a - e II denia ( vernb ~ 3 - t 1997 A ST ACTS Organized by Under the aegis of L'Institut français Société de recherche scientifique Française pour le développement d'Ichtyologie en coopération ' FI Fish Conference Nouméa - New Caledonia November 3 - 8 th, 1997 ABSTRACTS LATE ARRIVAL ZOOLOGICAL CATALOG OF AUSTRALIAN FISHES HOESE D.F., PAXTON J. & G. ALLEN Australian Museum, Sydney, Australia Currently over 4000 species of fishes are known from Australia. An analysis ofdistribution patterns of 3800 species is presented. Over 20% of the species are endemic to Australia, with endemic species occuiring primarily in southern Australia. There is also a small component of the fauna which is found only in the southwestern Pacific (New Caledonia, Lord Howe Island, Norfolk Island and New Zealand). The majority of the other species are widely distributed in the western Pacific Ocean. AGE AND GROWTH OF TROPICAL TUNAS FROM THE WESTERN CENTRAL PACIFIC OCEAN, AS INDICATED BY DAILY GROWm INCREMENTS AND TAGGING DATA. LEROY B. South Pacific Commission, Nouméa, New Caledonia The Oceanic Fisheries Programme of the South Pacific Commission is currently pursuing a research project on age and growth of two tropical tuna species, yellowfm tuna (Thunnus albacares) and bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus). The daily periodicity of microincrements forrned with the sagittal otoliths of these two spceies has been validated by oxytetracycline marking in previous studies. These validation studies have come from fishes within three regions of the Pacific (eastem, central and western tropical Pacific). Otolith microincrements are counted along transverse section with a light microscope.
    [Show full text]