DOCSLIB.ORG

Lakes Argyle and Kununurra Wetlands Ramsar Site Ecological Character Description

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lakes Argyle and Kununurra Wetlands Ramsar Site Ecological Character Description Lakes Argyle and Kununurra Ramsar Site Ecological Character Description Citation: Hale, J. and Morgan, D., 2010, Ecological Character Description for the Lakes Argyle and Kununurra Ramsar Site. Report to the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, Canberra. Acknowledgements: Danny Rogers, Australasian Waders Studies Group (expert advice) Halina Kobryn, Murdoch University (mapping and GIS) The steering committee was comprised of representatives of the following organisations: • Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts • WA Department of Environment and Conservation (Kununurra) • WA Department of Water (Kununurra) • Shire of Wyndham East Kimberley Introductory Notes This Ecological Character Description (ECD Publication) has been prepared in accordance with the National Framework and Guidance for Describing the Ecological Character of Australia’s Ramsar Wetlands (National Framework) (Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, 2008). The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) prohibits actions that are likely to have a significant impact on the ecological character of a Ramsar wetland unless the Commonwealth Environment Minister has approved the taking of the action, or some other provision in the EPBC Act allows the action to be taken. The information in this ECD Publication does not indicate any commitment to a particular course of action, policy position or decision. Further, it does not provide assessment of any particular action within the meaning of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth), nor replace the role of the Minister or his delegate in making an informed decision to approve an action. The Water Act 2007 requires that in preparing the [Murray-Darling] Basin Plan, the Murray Darling Basin Authority (MDBA) must take into account Ecological Character Descriptions of declared Ramsar wetlands prepared in accordance with the National Framework. This ECD Publication is provided without prejudice to any final decision by the Administrative Authority for Ramsar in Australia on change in ecological character in accordance with the requirements of Article 3.2 of the Ramsar Convention. Disclaimer While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure the contents of this ECD are correct, the Commonwealth of Australia as represented by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities does not guarantee and accepts no legal liability whatsoever arising from or connected to the currency, accuracy, completeness, reliability or suitability of the information in this ECD. Note: There may be differences in the type of information contained in this ECD publication, to those of other Ramsar wetlands. Table of Contents Glossary ..................................................................................................................................... iii List of Abbreviations .................................................................................................................. vi Executive Summary .................................................................................................................. vii 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Site details........................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Statement of purpose ....................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Relevant treaties, legislation and regulations .................................................................. 3 1.4 Method ............................................................................................................................. 5 2. General Description of the Lakes Argyle and Kununurra Ramsar Site ................................. 7 2.1 Location ............................................................................................................................ 7 2.2 Land tenure ...................................................................................................................... 7 2.3 Wetland types ................................................................................................................ 10 2.4 Ramsar criteria ............................................................................................................... 13 2.4.1 Criteria under which the site was designated ......................................................... 13 2.4.2 Assessment based on current information and Ramsar criteria ............................. 14 3. Critical Components and Processes ................................................................................... 19 3.1 Identifying critical components and processes .............................................................. 19 3.2 Essential elements ......................................................................................................... 21 3.2.1 Climate .................................................................................................................... 21 3.2.2 Geomorphology ....................................................................................................... 23 3.2.3 Water quality ........................................................................................................... 25 3.2.4 Wetland vegetation .................................................................................................. 27 3.2.5 Invertebrates ........................................................................................................... 30 3.3 Critical components and processes ............................................................................... 30 3.3.1 Hydrology ................................................................................................................ 31 3.3.2 Fish .......................................................................................................................... 32 3.4.3 Waterbirds ............................................................................................................... 34 3.5.4 Freshwater Crocodiles ............................................................................................ 36 3.6.5 Other fauna ............................................................................................................. 37 4 Ecosystem services .............................................................................................................. 38 4.1 Overview of benefits and services ................................................................................. 38 4.2 Identifying critical ecosystem services and benefits ...................................................... 39 4.3 Critical services .............................................................................................................. 39 4.3.1 Provides physical habitat for large numbers of waterbirds ..................................... 39 4.3.2 Priority wetland species – supports migratory birds ................................................ 41 4.3.3 Biodiversity – supports fish ..................................................................................... 43 4.3.4 Distinct wetland species - Crocodiles ...................................................................... 44 4.3.5 Water supply ........................................................................................................... 45 4.4 Non-critical services ....................................................................................................... 45 4.4.1 Commercial fishing .................................................................................................. 45 4.4.2 Recreation and tourism ........................................................................................... 46 4.4.3 Indigenous cultural values ....................................................................................... 46 4.5 Conceptual models ........................................................................................................ 47 5. Threats to Ecological Character .......................................................................................... 50 5.1 Invasive species ............................................................................................................. 52 5.1.1 Cane toad (Chaunus [Bufo] marinas) ...................................................................... 52 5.1.1 Redclaw crayfish (Cherax quadricarinatus) ............................................................ 52 5.1.3 Weeds ..................................................................................................................... 53 5.2 Water resource development ......................................................................................... 54 5.3 Commercial fishing ........................................................................................................ 54 5.4 Urban development and stormwater .............................................................................. 55 5.5 Fire ................................................................................................................................. 55 5.6 Summary of threats ........................................................................................................ 55 6. Limits of Acceptable
Load more

Recommended publications
  • §4-71-6.5 LIST of CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November
    §4-71-6.5 LIST OF CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November 28, 2006 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME INVERTEBRATES PHYLUM Annelida CLASS Oligochaeta ORDER Plesiopora FAMILY Tubificidae Tubifex (all species in genus) worm, tubifex PHYLUM Arthropoda CLASS Crustacea ORDER Anostraca FAMILY Artemiidae Artemia (all species in genus) shrimp, brine ORDER Cladocera FAMILY Daphnidae Daphnia (all species in genus) flea, water ORDER Decapoda FAMILY Atelecyclidae Erimacrus isenbeckii crab, horsehair FAMILY Cancridae Cancer antennarius crab, California rock Cancer anthonyi crab, yellowstone Cancer borealis crab, Jonah Cancer magister crab, dungeness Cancer productus crab, rock (red) FAMILY Geryonidae Geryon affinis crab, golden FAMILY Lithodidae Paralithodes camtschatica crab, Alaskan king FAMILY Majidae Chionocetes bairdi crab, snow Chionocetes opilio crab, snow 1 CONDITIONAL ANIMAL LIST §4-71-6.5 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Chionocetes tanneri crab, snow FAMILY Nephropidae Homarus (all species in genus) lobster, true FAMILY Palaemonidae Macrobrachium lar shrimp, freshwater Macrobrachium rosenbergi prawn, giant long-legged FAMILY Palinuridae Jasus (all species in genus) crayfish, saltwater; lobster Panulirus argus lobster, Atlantic spiny Panulirus longipes femoristriga crayfish, saltwater Panulirus pencillatus lobster, spiny FAMILY Portunidae Callinectes sapidus crab, blue Scylla serrata crab, Samoan; serrate, swimming FAMILY Raninidae Ranina ranina crab, spanner; red frog, Hawaiian CLASS Insecta ORDER Coleoptera FAMILY Tenebrionidae Tenebrio molitor mealworm,
    [Show full text]
  • Ord River Diversion Dam EHR Nomination Rev 2
    ENGINEERS AUSTRALIA Western Australia Division NOMINATION OF ORD RIVER DIVERSION DAM FOR AN ENGINEERING HERITAGE AUSTRALIA HERITAGE RECOGNITION AWARD Diversion Dam and Lake Kununurra on July 20, 1963 PREPARED BY ENGINEERING HERITAGE WESTERN AUSTRALIA ENGINEERS AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DIVISION Revision 2: September 2013 (Original Version: March 2013, Revision 1: Sept 2013) CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 3 2. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE ................................................................................. 4 3. LOCATION ..................................................................................................................... 5 4. HERITAGE RECOGNITION NOMINATION FORM ....................................................... 7 5. OWNER'S LETTER OF AGREEMENT .......................................................................... 8 6. HISTORICAL SUMMARY .............................................................................................. 9 7. BASIC DATA .................................................................................................................. 10 8. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT ....................................................................................... 11 8.1 Hydraulic Design Considerations .......................................................................... 11 8.2 Design of Radial Gates and Concrete Works ....................................................... 13 8.3 Site
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes of the King Edward River in the Kimberley Region, Western Australia
    Records of the Western Australian Museum 25: 351–368 (2010). Fishes of the King Edward River in the Kimberley region, Western Australia David L. Morgan Freshwater Fish Group, Centre for Fish and Fisheries Research, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract – The King Edward River, in the far north of the Kimberley region of Western Australia drains approximately 10,000 km2 and discharges into the Timor Sea near the town of Kalumburu. This study represents an ichthyological survey of the river’s freshwaters and revealed that the number of freshwater fishes of the King Edward River is higher than has previously been recorded for a Western Australian river. Twenty-six strictly freshwater fish species were recorded, which is three species higher than the much larger Fitzroy River in the southern Kimberley. The study also identified a number of range extensions, including Butler’s Grunter and Shovel-nosed Catfish to the west, and the Slender Gudgeon to the north and east. A possibly undescribed species of glassfish, that differs morphologically from described species in arrangement of head spines, fin rays, as well as relative body measurements, is reported. A considerable proportion of Jenkins’ Grunter, which is widespread throughout the system but essentially restricted to main channel sites, had ‘blubber-lips’. There were significant differences in the prevailing fish fauna of the different reaches of the King Edward River system. Thus fish associations in the upper King Edward River main channel were significantly different to those in the tributaries and the main channel of the Carson River.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Freshwater Catfish (Pisces: Ariidae) from Northern Australia
    Rec. West. Aust. Mus. 1988,14(1): 73-89 A new freshwater catfish (Pisces: Ariidae) from northern Australia PatriciaJ. Kailola* and Bryan E. Pierce* Abstract A new species of fork-tailed catfish is described on the basis of 31 specimens collected in northern Australia between the Fitzroy River (Western Australia) and the Mitchell River (Queensland). Arius midgleyi sp. novo grows to at least 1.3 m TL and is distinguished from other Australo-Papuan ariids by a combination of charac­ ters including snout shape, barbel length, eye size, tooth arrangement and gill raker number and position. Comparison is made with other ariid species occurring in northern Australian rivers, including the morphologically similar A. leptaspis (Bleeker). Introduction The Timor Sea and Gulf of Carpentaria drainage systems (Lake 1971) approx­ imately represent the Leichhardtian zoogeographic region of Whitley (1947). The rainfall pattern in this region is dominated by the wet monsoon (occurring within the period November to April). Most rivers here traverse a flat coastal plain about 15 km wide before reaching the sea (Lake 1971). These rivers commonly possess wide flood plains and low gradients, often contracting to a chain of waterholes during the dry season; some (Gregory River; Fitzroy to Daly Rivers) have reaches of rapids or very deep gorges. The average annual discharge from this region is 69000 billion litres (Lake 1971), most of it occurring during the wet season. Five of Australia's 18 species of fork-tailed catfishes (Ariidae) are common in this northern region, yet were overlooked by Whitley (1947) and Iredale and Whitley (1938). The members of this family, which is distributed circumglobally in the tropics and subtropics, may inhabit the sea, rivers within tidal influence, or fresh waters.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Fauna of the Fitzroy River in the Kimberley Region of Western Australia - Including the Bunuba, Gooniyandi, Ngarinyin, Nyikina and Walmajarri Aboriginal Names
    DOI: 10.18195/issn.0312-3162.22(2).2004.147-161 Records of the Westelll Allstralllll1 A//uselllll 22 ]47-]6] (2004). Fish fauna of the Fitzroy River in the Kimberley region of Western Australia - including the Bunuba, Gooniyandi, Ngarinyin, Nyikina and Walmajarri Aboriginal names J J 2 3 David L. Morgan , Mark G. Allen , Patsy Bedford and Mark Horstman 1 Centre for Fish & Fisheries Research, School of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia 6]50 KImberley Language Resource Centre, PO Box 86, Fitzroy Crossing, Western Australia 6765 'Kimberley Land Council, PO Box 2145, Broome Western Australia 6725 Abstract - This project surveyed the fish fauna of the Fitzroy River, one of Australia's largest river systems that remains unregulated, 'located in the Kimberley region of Western Australia. A total of 37 fish species were recorded in the 70 sites sampled. Twenty-three of these species are freshwater fishes (i.e. they complete their life-cycle in freshwater), the remainder being of estuarine or marine origin that may spend part of their life-cycle in freshwater. The number of freshwater species in the Fitzroy River is high by Australian standards. Three of the freshwater fish species recorded ar'e currently undescribed, and two have no formal common or scientific names, but do have Aboriginal names. Where possible, the English (common), scientific and Aboriginal names for the different speCIes of the river are given. This includes the Aboriginal names of the fish for the following five languages (Bunuba, Gooniyandi, Ngarinyin, Nyikina and Walmajarri) of the Fitzroy River Valley. The fish fauna of the river was shown to be significantly different between each of the lower, middle and upper reaches of the main channeL Furthermore, the smaller tributaries and the upper gorge country sites were significantly different to those in the main channel, while the major billabongs of the river had fish assemblages significantly different to all sites with the exception of the middle reaches of the river.
    [Show full text]
  • Ord River Hydro-Electric Project
    Ord River hydro-electric project Argyle Diamond Mines Pty Limited Report and recommendations of the Environmental Protection Authority Environmentai Proieciion Authority Perth, Western Australia Bulletin 615 March, 1992 THE PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT This report contains the Environmental Protection Authority's environmental assessment and recommendations to the Minister for the Environment on the environmental acceptability of the proposal. Immediately following the release of the report there is a 14-day period when anyone may appeal to the Minister against the Environmental Protection Authority's recommendations. After the appeal period, and determination of any appeals, the Minister consults with the other relevant ministers and agencies and then issues his decision about whether the proposal may or may not proceed. The Minister also announces the legally binding environmental conditions which might apply to any approval. APPEALS If you disagree with any of the assessment report recommendations you may appeal in writing to the Minister for the Environment outlining tbe environmental reasons for your concern and enclosing the appeal fee of $10. It is important that you clearly indicate the part of the report you disagree with and the reasons for your concern so that the grounds of your appeal can be properly considered by the Minister for the En vironmeni. ADDRESS Hon Minister for tbe Environment 18th Floor, Allendale Square 77 StGeorge's Terrace PERTH WA 60<XJ CLOSING DATE Your appeal (with the $10 fcc) must reach the Minister's office no later than 5.00 p.m. on 3 April, 1992. Contents Page Summary aud recommendations 1. Introduction 1 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices Appendices
    APPENDICES APPENDICES APPENDIX 1 – PUBLICATIONS SCIENTIFIC PAPERS Aidoo EN, Ute Mueller U, Hyndes GA, and Ryan Braccini M. 2015. Is a global quantitative KL. 2016. The effects of measurement uncertainty assessment of shark populations warranted? on spatial characterisation of recreational fishing Fisheries, 40: 492–501. catch rates. Fisheries Research 181: 1–13. Braccini M. 2016. Experts have different Andrews KR, Williams AJ, Fernandez-Silva I, perceptions of the management and conservation Newman SJ, Copus JM, Wakefield CB, Randall JE, status of sharks. Annals of Marine Biology and and Bowen BW. 2016. Phylogeny of deepwater Research 3: 1012. snappers (Genus Etelis) reveals a cryptic species pair in the Indo-Pacific and Pleistocene invasion of Braccini M, Aires-da-Silva A, and Taylor I. 2016. the Atlantic. Molecular Phylogenetics and Incorporating movement in the modelling of shark Evolution 100: 361-371. and ray population dynamics: approaches and management implications. Reviews in Fish Biology Bellchambers LM, Gaughan D, Wise B, Jackson G, and Fisheries 26: 13–24. and Fletcher WJ. 2016. Adopting Marine Stewardship Council certification of Western Caputi N, de Lestang S, Reid C, Hesp A, and How J. Australian fisheries at a jurisdictional level: the 2015. Maximum economic yield of the western benefits and challenges. Fisheries Research 183: rock lobster fishery of Western Australia after 609-616. moving from effort to quota control. Marine Policy, 51: 452-464. Bellchambers LM, Fisher EA, Harry AV, and Travaille KL. 2016. Identifying potential risks for Charles A, Westlund L, Bartley DM, Fletcher WJ, Marine Stewardship Council assessment and Garcia S, Govan H, and Sanders J.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Gulf, Queensland
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Ministerial Visit to Shanghai, China 3 – 7 November 2018
    Report on Ministerial Visit to Shanghai, China 3 – 7 November 2018 Hon Alannah MacTiernan MLC Minister for Regional Development; Agriculture and Food; Minister Assisting the Minister for State Development, Jobs and Trade 1 Overview China is Western Australia’s largest market for merchandise exports, accounting for 47 per cent of the State’s exports in 2017-18 – close to $62 billion worth. As our largest market for agricultural and food exports, China accounted for 22 per cent of agricultural exports in 2016-17, valued at $1.89 billion. The Hon Alannah MacTiernan MLC attended the China International Import Expo 2018 (CIIE) in Shanghai from 3 – 7 November 2018 to fly the flag for our relationship with China. The CIIE is a six-day multi-sector tradeshow for imported products, timed with the 40th anniversary of the opening of the Chinese economy to international trade and investment. This event was an initiative by President Xi Jinping, and CIIE is an undertaking on a massive scale. The venue for the expo is the newly constructed National Exhibition and Convention Centre, with an exhibition space of over 28 times the size of the Melbourne Cricket Ground. Nineteen Western Australian companies displayed wine, honey, pork and other premium products to an estimated 400,000 Chinese buyers. Minister MacTiernan visited these displays and attended the opening of the Australian Pavilion at the Expo with Australian dignitaries such as the Australian Ambassador to China, Ms Jan Adams, Australian Minister for Trade, Senator the Hon Simon Birmingham and
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Fishes of Kakadu National Park and the Impact of Sea Level Rise
    Freshwater fishes of Kakadu National Park and the impact of sea level rise What is the issue? (both brackish and freshwater) may persist in the landscape for less time. While some estuarine species Sixty two species of freshwater fish have been may potentially benefit from expanded tidal habitat, recorded from Kakadu National Park. For 11 of some lowland freshwater species, particularly those these species, between 15% and 40% of their total largely confined to this habitat type, would appear to predicted distribution occurs within the Park. Many be vulnerable. This study, funded under the Northern freshwater fish species in the Park are likely to be Australia Hub of the Australian Government’s impacted by climate change, especially saltwater National Environmental Research Program, examined intrusion onto freshwater floodplains as a result of the direct effects of sea level rise on floodplain sea level rise and increased storm surge. freshwater fish species. Sea level rise is predicted to cause rapid and substantial habitat changes. In particular, affected What did the research do? freshwater wetlands are predicted to change to To predict the extent of impact of sea level rise open saline mudflats. Floodplain and mudflat on floodplain fishes the team developed a model habitats may also experience higher temperatures incorporating topographic information for the and faster evaporation rates and seasonal wetlands lowland rivers, floodplains and estuaries of the Park and the predicted distribution data for 55 freshwater fish species. While climate change scientists are confident that sea levels will rise, due to the complexity of climate systems, the exact rate and amount of change is unknown.
    [Show full text]
  • How Is Water Allocation Decided? Managing Water from the Ord River How the System Works ^ Contact Information Further Informatio
    Managing water from Quick water facts How is water allocation decided? the Ord River The priority set by government is for secure and The Ord River is one of the Goomig farmland reliable water supplies to maximise the irrigation most significant waterways in potential of the region, while at the same time Keep River supporting hydro-electricity generation and sustaining Australia. It provides for water Plain to an iconic agricultural project, a healthy downstream river environment. supports local tourism and The Department of Water is responsible for managing sustains a unique Kimberley Carlton Plain Tarrara Bar streamflow gauge Knox Creek and licensing water from the Ord River under the environment. Plain ^ Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914 (WA). Its We are seeing the largest Mantinea Green Swamp Ord surface water allocation plan supports the Knox Creek development of irrigated land government priorities through water allocation limits Ivanhoe Plain in the Ord River area since the Ord West which control the total volume of entitlements that can Bank 1960s. The Ord-East Kimberley be issued, and water release rules and water sharing Eight Mile Creek Irrigation Expansion Project NorthernTerritory rules which are managed though licences. plans to increase the size of the Ord irrigation area by !( Kununurra The water release rules are particularly important Ð Lake Kununurra 15,400 hectares in the short Legend Kununurra Diversion Dam Ò during times of below-average storage and dry !( Towns term with potential for further ^ Streamflow gauge Packsaddle periods, and ensure the most effective water sharing. Plain expansion beyond this in ÒÐ Dam site The rules were set using a water balance model Western Australia and into the Roads that weighs up hydrology, water demands, reliability, Rivers Northern Territory.
    [Show full text]
  • East Kimberley Impact Assessment Project
    East Kimberley Impact Assessment Project IMPACT STORIES OF THE EAST KIMBERLEY Helen Ross (Editor) Eileen Bray (translator) East Kimberley Working Paper No. 28 ISSN 0 86740 356 X ISBN 0816-6323 ,.- April 1989 A Joint Project Of The: Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies Australian National University Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies Anthropology Department University of Western Australia Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia The aims of the project are as follows: 1. To compile a comprehensive profile of the contemporary social environment of the East Kimberley region utilising both existing information sources and limited fieldwork. 2. Develop and utilise appropriate methodological approaches to social impact assessment within a multi-disciplinary framework. 3. Assess the social impact of major public and private developments of the East Kimberley region's resources (physical, mineral and environmental) on resident Aboriginal communities. Attempt to identify problems/issues which, while possibly dormant at present, are likely to have implications that will affect communities at some stage in the future. 4. Establish a framework to allow the dissemination of research results to Aboriginal communities so as to enable them to develop their own strategies for dealing with social impact issues. 5. To identify in consultation with Governments and regional interests issues and problems which may be susceptible to further research. Views expressed in the Projecfs publications are the views of the authors, and are not necessarily shared by the sponsoring organisations. Address correspondence to: The Executive Officer East Kimberley Project CRES, ANU GPO Box4 Canberra City, ACT 2601 IMPACT STORIES OF THE EAST KIMBERLEY Helen Ross (Editor) Eileen Bray (translator) East Kimberley Working Paper No.
    [Show full text]