DOCSLIB.ORG

The Role of Autonomy in Dod Systems

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

TASK FORCE REPORT: The Role of Autonomy in DoD Systems July 2012 This report is a product of the Defense Science Board (DSB). The DSB is a Federal Advisory Committee established to provide independent advice to the Secretary of Defense. Statements, opinions, conclusions, and recommendations in this report do not necessarily represent the official position of the Department of Defense. The DSB Task Force on The Role of Autonomy in DoD Systems completed its information gathering in October 2011. This report is UNCLASSIFIED and releasable to the public. OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 3140 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301–3140 DEFENSE SCIENCE BOARD 19 July 2012 MEMORANDUM FOR UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR ACQUISITION, TECHNOLOGY, AND LOGISTICS SUBJECT: Final Report of the Defense Science Board (DSB) Task Force on the Role of Autonomy in Department of Defense (DoD) Systems I am pleased to forward the final report of the DSB Task Force on the Role of Autonomy in DoD Systems. The Task Force was asked to study relevant technologies, ongoing research, and the current autonomy-relevant plans of the Military Services, to assist the DoD in identifying new opportunities to more aggressively use autonomy in military missions, to anticipate vulnerabilities, and to make recommendations for overcoming operational difficulties and systemic barriers to realizing the full potential of autonomous systems. The Task Force has concluded that, while currently fielded unmanned systems are making positive contributions across DoD operations, autonomy technology is being underutilized as a result of material obstacles within the Department that are inhibiting the broad acceptance of autonomy and its ability to more fully realize the benefits of unmanned systems. Key among these obstacles identified by the Task Force are poor design, lack of effective coordination of research and development (R&D) efforts across the Military Services, and operational challenges created by the urgent deployment of unmanned systems to theater without adequate resources or time to refine concepts of operations and training. To address the issues that are limiting more extensive use of autonomy in DoD systems, the Task Force recommends a crosscutting approach that includes the following key elements: • The DoD should embrace a three-facet (cognitive echelon, mission timelines and human-machine system trade spaces) autonomous systems framework to assist program managers in shaping technology programs, as well as to assist acquisition officers and developers in making key decisions related to the design and evaluation of future systems. • The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering (ASD(R&E)) should work with the Military Services to establish a coordinated science and technology (S&T) program guided by feedback from operational experience and evolving mission requirements. • The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics (USD(AT&L)) should create developmental and operational test and evaluation (T&E) techniques that focus on the unique challenges of autonomy (to include developing operational training techniques that explicitly build trust in autonomous systems). • The Joint Staff and the Military Services should improve the requirements process to develop a mission capability pull for autonomous systems to identify missed opportunities and desirable future system capabilities. Overall, the Task Force found that unmanned systems are making a significant, positive impact on DoD objectives worldwide. However, the true value of these systems is not to provide a direct human replacement, but rather to extend and complement human capability by providing potentially unlimited persistent capabilities, reducing human exposure to life threatening tasks, and with proper design, reducing the high cognitive load currently placed on operators/supervisors. I fully endorse all of the Task Force’s findings and urge you adopt their recommendations. DEFENSE SCIENCE BOARD | DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Misperceptions about Autonomy are Limiting its Adoption .......................................... 1 1.2. Create an Autonomous Systems Reference Framework to Replace “Levels of Autonomy” ...................................................................................................................... 3 1.3. Technical Challenges Remain, Some Proven Autonomy Capability Underutilized ......... 7 1.4. Autonomous Systems Pose Unique Acquisition Challenges ......................................... 10 1.5. Avoid Capability Surprise by Anticipating Adversary Use of Autonomous Systems ..... 13 2.0 Operational Benefits of Autonomy ......................................................................................... 15 2.1. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles ............................................................................................ 15 2.2. Unmanned Ground Systems ......................................................................................... 16 2.3. Unmanned Maritime Vehicles ...................................................................................... 17 2.4. Unmanned Space Systems ............................................................................................ 18 2.5. Conclusion ..................................................................................................................... 19 3.0 Technical Issues of Autonomy ................................................................................................ 21 3.1. Motivation: What Makes Autonomy Hard .................................................................... 22 3.2. Defining Levels of Autonomy is Not Useful ................................................................... 23 3.3. Autonomous System Reference Framework ................................................................ 24 3.4. Needed Technology Development ................................................................................ 31 3.5. Technical Recommendations ........................................................................................ 54 4.0 Acquisition Issues of Autonomy .............................................................................................. 56 4.1. Requirements and Development .................................................................................. 56 4.2. Test and Evaluation ....................................................................................................... 62 4.3. Transition to Operational Deployment ......................................................................... 65 5.0 Capability Surprise in Autonomy Technology ......................................................................... 68 5.1. Overview of Global Unmanned Systems ....................................................................... 68 5.2. Unmanned Symmetric Adversary Scenarios ................................................................. 71 5.3. Value for Asymmetric Adversaries ................................................................................ 73 5.4. External Vulnerabilities ................................................................................................. 75 5.5. Self-Imposed Vulnerabilities ......................................................................................... 75 5.6. Recommendations ........................................................................................................ 76 DSB TASK FORCE REPORT Table of Contents| v The Role of Autonomy in DoD Systems DEFENSE SCIENCE BOARD | DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Appendix A—Details of Operational Benefits by Domain ............................................................ 78 A.1. Aerial Systems Strategy ................................................................................................. 78 A.2. Maritime Systems .......................................................................................................... 85 A.3. Ground Systems ............................................................................................................ 92 A.4. Space Systems ............................................................................................................... 95 Appendix B—Bibliography ............................................................................................................ 99 Appendix C—Task Force Terms of Reference ............................................................................. 107 Appendix D—Task Force Membership ....................................................................................... 109 Appendix E—Task Force Briefings .............................................................................................. 110 Appendix F—Glossary ................................................................................................................. 111 DSB TASK FORCE REPORT Table of Contents| vi The Role of Autonomy in DoD Systems DEFENSE SCIENCE BOARD | DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE List of Figures Figure 1-1 Framework for the Design and Evaluation of Autonomous Systems ......................................... 5 Figure 1-2 Autonomous System Reference Framework - Scope of Cognitive Functions Across Echelons .. 6 Figure 1-3 Status of Technology Deployment and Remaining Challenges .................................................. 9 Figure 3-1 Framework for the Design
Recommended publications
  • Autonomy and Republicanism: Immanuel Kant's Philosophy of Freedom Author(S): Heiner Bielefeldt Source: Political Theory, Vol

    Autonomy and Republicanism: Immanuel Kant's Philosophy of Freedom Author(S): Heiner Bielefeldt Source: Political Theory, Vol

    Autonomy and Republicanism: Immanuel Kant's Philosophy of Freedom Author(s): Heiner Bielefeldt Source: Political Theory, Vol. 25, No. 4 (Aug., 1997), pp. 524-558 Published by: Sage Publications, Inc. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/191892 Accessed: 25-05-2018 14:18 UTC REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: http://www.jstor.org/stable/191892?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms Sage Publications, Inc. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Political Theory This content downloaded from 81.157.207.121 on Fri, 25 May 2018 14:18:33 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms AUTONOMY AND REPUBLICANISM Immanuel Kant's Philosophy of Freedom HEINER BIELEFELDT University of Bielefeld INTRODUCTION: THE PARADOX OF LIBERALISM Since its origins in early modernity, liberalism has always been a hotly debated issue. A charge frequently brought forward is that liberalism mirrors a lack of ethical substance in modern society, a society which seemingly loses its inner normative cohesiveness and hence can be held together only by a set of abstract procedural rules.
  • Volume 4 the Many-Splendored Society

    Volume 4 the Many-Splendored Society

    Volume 4 The Many-Splendored Society: The Pursuit of Knowledge First edition This book describes how science became an independent realm of society. We also describe its contemporary nature and its relations to other realms, including those pursuing journal- istic, religious, political, and economic ends. This book stands alone, and one can read it by itself. It serves also as the fourth installment to a larger work in seven volumes about social theory and about a many-splendored society that is within human reach. To Karin Busch Zetterberg Also by Hans L Zetterberg On Theory and Verification in Sociology (also in Spanish, Japanese, and Swedish) Social Theory and Social Practice Arbete, livsstil och motivation Museums and Adult Education (also in French) Sexual Life in Sweden (translated and introduced by Graham Fennell) Det osynliga kontraktet (with Karin Busch and others) The World at Work (with main author Daniel Yankelovich and others) Before and Beyond the Welfare State. Three Lectures Sociologins följeslagare Sociological Endeavor. Selected Writings (edited by Richard Swedberg and Emil Uddhammar) Vårt land — den svenska socialstaten (with Carl Johan Ljungberg) Zetterberg texter (edited by Roland Poirier Martinsson) Published and planned volumes of “The Many-Splendored Society” Volume 1. Surrounded by Symbols, 2009, 3rd ed 2013, chapters 1-5 Volume 2. An Edifice of Symbols, 2010, 3rd ed 2013, chapters 6-10 Volume 3. Fueled by Symbols, 2010, 3rd ed 2013, chapters 11-17 Volume 4, The Pursuit of Knowledge, 2013, chapters 18-28 (the present book) Volume 5 The Pursuit of Beauty, Sacredness and Virtue Volume 6. The Pursuit of Wealth and Order Volume 7.
  • The Effectiveness of Influence Activities in Information Warfare

    The Effectiveness of Influence Activities in Information Warfare

    The Effectiveness of Influence Activities in Information Warfare Cassandra Lee Brooker A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Research School of Business May 2020 Thesis/Dissertation Sheet Surname : BROOKER Given Name/s : CASSANDRA LEE Abbreviation for degree : MRes Faculty : UNSW Canberra School : School of Business Thesis Title : The Effectiveness of Influence Activities in Information Warfare Abstract Rapid, globalised power shifts, technological advances, and increasingly interconnected, ungoverned communications networks have resulted in the rise of asymmetric grey zone threats. The lines are now blurred between political, civil, and military information environments. The rise of influence activities is the new ‘sharp power’ in information warfare (the iWar). Western democracies are already at war in the information domain and are being out-communicated by their adversaries. Building on the commentary surrounding this contemporary threat, and based on a review of the literature across three academic disciplines of: Systems Thinking, Influence, and Cognitive Theory; this study aimed to investigate solutions for improving Australia’s influence effectiveness in the iWar. This study asked how systems thinking can offer an effective approach to holistically understanding complex social systems in the iWar; as well as asking why understanding both successful influencing strategies and psychological cognitive theories is central to analysing those system behaviours. To answer the aim, a systems thinking methodology was employed to compare two contrasting case studies to determine their respective influencing effectiveness. The successful case system comprising the terrorist group ISIS was compared and contrasted with the unsuccessful case system of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 election campaign – using a single stock of influence to determine relevant reinforcing and balancing feedback.
  • Agile Command Capability: Future Command in the Joint Battlespace and Its Implications for Capability Development

    Agile Command Capability: Future Command in the Joint Battlespace and Its Implications for Capability Development

    UNCLASSIFIED DRAFT AGILE COMMAND CAPABILITY: FUTURE COMMAND IN THE JOINT BATTLESPACE AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT Steven J. Harland, MPhil(Cantab), C. Psychol, FRSA Gregory Harland Ltd Surrey Research Park Guildford GU2 7YG United Kingdom Paul J. Shanahan, PhD Gregory Harland Ltd Surrey Research Park Guildford GU2 7YG United Kingdom Cdr David J. Bewick MA RN Command Development Directorate of Command and Battlespace Management/J6 Ministry of Defence St Giles Court 1-13 St Giles High Street London WC2H 8LD United Kingdom UNCLASSIFIED DRAFT UNCLASSIFIED DRAFT AGILE COMMAND CAPABILITY: FUTURE COMMAND IN THE JOINT BATTLESPACE AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT1 Steven J. Harland, MPhil(Cantab), C. Psychol, FRSA Gregory Harland Ltd Surrey Research Park Guildford GU2 7YG United Kingdom Paul J. Shanahan, PhD Gregory Harland Ltd Surrey Research Park Guildford GU2 7YG United Kingdom Cdr David J. Bewick, MA RN Command Development Directorate of Command and Battlespace Management/J6 Ministry of Defence St Giles Court 1-13 St Giles High Street London WC2H 8LD United Kingdom Command cannot be understood in isolation. The available data processes technology and the nature of armaments in use; tactics and strategy; organisational structure and manpower systems; training, discipline, and…the ethos of war; the political construction of states and the social makeup of armies – all these things and many more impinge on command in war and in turn are affected by it.2 Martin van Creveld, Command in War ABSTRACT The paper defines the Ministry of Defence (MoD) requirements for Future Command3 within the context of the United Kingdom’s (UK) Joint Higher Level Operational Concept (HLOC).
  • Global Inventory of AUV and Glider Technology Available for Routine Marine Surveying

    Global Inventory of AUV and Glider Technology Available for Routine Marine Surveying

    Appendix 1. Global Inventory of AUVs and Gliders Global Inventory of AUV and Glider Technology available for Routine Marine Surveying Project Leaders: Dr Russell Wynn (NOC) and Dr Elizabeth Linley (NERC) Report Prepared by: Dr James Hunt (NOC) Inventory correct as of September 2013 1 Return to Contents Appendix 1. Global Inventory of AUVs and Gliders Contents United Kingdom Institutes ................................................................. 16 Marine Autonomous and Robotic Systems (MARS) at National Oceanography Centre (NOC), Southampton ................................. 17 Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs) at MARS ................................... 18 Autosub3 ...................................................................................................... 18 Technical Specification for Autosub3 ......................................................... 18 Autosub6000 ................................................................................................ 19 Technical Specification .............................................................................. 19 Autosub LR ...................................................................................................... 20 Technical Specification .............................................................................. 20 Air-Launched AUVs ........................................................................................ 21 Gliders at MARS .............................................................................................. 22 Teledyne
  • Life with Augustine

    Life with Augustine

    Life with Augustine ...a course in his spirit and guidance for daily living By Edmond A. Maher ii Life with Augustine © 2002 Augustinian Press Australia Sydney, Australia. Acknowledgements: The author wishes to acknowledge and thank the following people: ► the Augustinian Province of Our Mother of Good Counsel, Australia, for support- ing this project, with special mention of Pat Fahey osa, Kevin Burman osa, Pat Codd osa and Peter Jones osa ► Laurence Mooney osa for assistance in editing ► Michael Morahan osa for formatting this 2nd Edition ► John Coles, Peter Gagan, Dr. Frank McGrath fms (Brisbane CEO), Benet Fonck ofm, Peter Keogh sfo for sharing their vast experience in adult education ► John Rotelle osa, for granting us permission to use his English translation of Tarcisius van Bavel’s work Augustine (full bibliography within) and for his scholarly advice Megan Atkins for her formatting suggestions in the 1st Edition, that have carried over into this the 2nd ► those generous people who have completed the 1st Edition and suggested valuable improvements, especially Kath Neehouse and friends at Villanova College, Brisbane Foreword 1 Dear Participant Saint Augustine of Hippo is a figure in our history who has appealed to the curiosity and imagination of many generations. He is well known for being both sinner and saint, for being a bishop yet also a fellow pilgrim on the journey to God. One of the most popular and attractive persons across many centuries, his influence on the church has continued to our current day. He is also renowned for his influ- ence in philosophy and psychology and even (in an indirect way) art, music and architecture.
  • Review of Advanced Medical Telerobots

    Review of Advanced Medical Telerobots

    applied sciences Review Review of Advanced Medical Telerobots Sarmad Mehrdad 1,†, Fei Liu 2,† , Minh Tu Pham 3 , Arnaud Lelevé 3,* and S. Farokh Atashzar 1,4,5 1 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, New York University (NYU), Brooklyn, NY 11201, USA; [email protected] (S.M.); [email protected] (S.F.A.) 2 Advanced Robotics and Controls Lab, University of San Diego, San Diego, CA 92110, USA; [email protected] 3 Ampère, INSA Lyon, CNRS (UMR5005), F69621 Villeurbanne, France; [email protected] 4 Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, New York University (NYU), Brooklyn, NY 11201, USA 5 NYU WIRELESS, Brooklyn, NY 11201, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +33-0472-436035 † Mehrdad and Liu contributed equally to this work and share the first authorship. Abstract: The advent of telerobotic systems has revolutionized various aspects of the industry and human life. This technology is designed to augment human sensorimotor capabilities to extend them beyond natural competence. Classic examples are space and underwater applications when distance and access are the two major physical barriers to be combated with this technology. In modern examples, telerobotic systems have been used in several clinical applications, including teleoperated surgery and telerehabilitation. In this regard, there has been a significant amount of research and development due to the major benefits in terms of medical outcomes. Recently telerobotic systems are combined with advanced artificial intelligence modules to better share the agency with the operator and open new doors of medical automation. In this review paper, we have provided a comprehensive analysis of the literature considering various topologies of telerobotic systems in the medical domain while shedding light on different levels of autonomy for this technology, starting from direct control, going up to command-tracking autonomous telerobots.
  • Autonomy in Medical Ethics After O'neill

    Autonomy in Medical Ethics After O'neill

    127 J Med Ethics: first published as 10.1136/jme.2004.008292 on 28 February 2005. Downloaded from CLINICAL ETHICS Autonomy in medical ethics after O’Neill G M Stirrat, R Gill ............................................................................................................................... J Med Ethics 2005;31:127–130. doi: 10.1136/jme.2004.008292 Following the influential Gifford and Reith lectures by Onora O’Neill, this paper explores further the paradigm of individual autonomy which has been so dominant in bioethics until recently and concurs that See end of article for authors’ affiliations it is an aberrant application and that conceptions of individual autonomy cannot provide a sufficient and ....................... convincing starting point for ethics within medical practice. We suggest that revision of the operational definition of patient autonomy is required for the twenty first century. We follow O’Neill in recommending Correspondence to: G M Stirrat, Centre for a principled version of patient autonomy, which for us involves the provision of sufficient and Ethics in Medicine understandable information and space for patients, who have the capacity to make a settled choice about University of Bristol, Bristol, medical interventions on themselves, to do so responsibly in a manner considerate to others. We test it UK; gstirrat@blueyonder. co.uk against the patient–doctor relationship in which each fully respects the autonomy of the other based on an unspoken covenant and bilateral trust between the doctor and patient. Indeed we consider that the Received 31 January 2004 dominance of the individual autonomy paradigm harmed that relationship. Although it seems to eliminate In revised form any residue of medical paternalism we suggest that it has tended to replace it with an equally (or possibly 25 April 2004 Accepted for publication even more) unacceptable bioethical paternalism.
  • In Defense of the Development of Augustine's Doctrine of Grace By

    In Defense of the Development of Augustine's Doctrine of Grace By

    In Defense of the Development of Augustine’s Doctrine of Grace by Laban Omondi Agisa Submitted to the faculty of the School of Theology of the University of the South in Partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Sacred Theology January 2020 Sewanee, Tennessee Approved ____________________________ _______________ Adviser Date ____________________________ _______________ Second Adviser Date 2 DECLARATION I declare that this is my original work and has not been presented in any other institution for consideration of any certification. This work has been complemented by sources duly acknowledged and cited using Chicago Manual Style. Signature Date 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT My study of theology was initiated in 2009 by the then Provost of St. Stephens Cathedral, Nairobi, the late Ven. Canon John Ndung’u who was a great encouragement to me. This was further made possible through my bishop the Rt. Rev. Joel Waweru and the Rev. Geoffrey Okapisi who were sources of inspiration. My studies at Carlile College (Church Army Africa) and St. Paul’s University laid a strong theological foundation and I appreciate among others the influence of the Rev. Dr. John Kiboi who introduced me to Philosophy, Systematic Theology, Ethics, and African Christian Theology that eventually became the foundation for my studies at the University of the South. I also appreciate the encouragement of my lecturers Mrs. Tabitha Waweru and Dr. Scholarstica Githinji during my Study of Education at Kenya Technical Trainers College and at Daystar University respectively. My interest in this topic came as a result of many sittings with two professors at the University of the South, Dr.
  • And Financial Implications of Unmanned

    And Financial Implications of Unmanned

    Disruptive Innovation and Naval Power: Strategic and Financial Implications of Unmanned Underwater Vehicles (UUVs) and Long-term Underwater Power Sources MASSACHUsf TTT IMef0hrE OF TECHNOLOGY by Richard Winston Larson MAY 0 8 201 S.B. Engineering LIBRARIES Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2012 Submitted to the Department of Mechanical Engineering in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY February 2014 © Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2014. All rights reserved. 2) Author Dep.atment of Mechanical Engineering nuaryL5.,3014 Certified by.... Y Douglas P. Hart Professor of Mechanical Engineering Tbesis Supervisor A ccepted by ....................... ........ David E. Hardt Ralph E. and Eloise F. Cross Professor of Mechanical Engineering 2 Disruptive Innovation and Naval Power: Strategic and Financial Implications of Unmanned Underwater Vehicles (UUVs) and Long-term Underwater Power Sources by Richard Winston Larson Submitted to the Department of Mechanical Engineering on January 15, 2014, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering Abstract The naval warfare environment is rapidly changing. The U.S. Navy is adapting by continuing its blue-water dominance while simultaneously building brown-water ca- pabilities. Unmanned systems, such as unmanned airborne drones, are proving piv- otal in facing new battlefield challenges. Unmanned underwater vehicles (UUVs) are emerging as the Navy's seaborne equivalent of the Air Force's drones. Representing a low-end disruptive technology relative to traditional shipborne operations, UUVs are becoming capable of taking on increasingly complex roles, tipping the scales of battlefield entropy. They improve mission outcomes and operate for a fraction of the cost of traditional operations.
  • Panospheric Video for Robotic Telexploration

    Panospheric Video for Robotic Telexploration

    Panospheric Video for Robotic Telexploration John R. Murphy CMU-RI-TR-98-10 Submined in partial fulfiient of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Robotics The Robotics Institute Cknegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213 May 1998 0 1998 by John R. Murphy. All rights reserved. This research was supported in part by NASA grant NAGW-117.5. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the author and should not be interpreted as representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of NASA or the U.S. Government. Robotics Thesis Panospheric Video for Robotic Telexploration John Murphy Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the field of Robotics ACC-. William L. Whittaka TheEis Cormittee Chair Date Matthew T. Mason- - Program Chir Y Date APPROVED: fL-4 36 JiiIff+? Pa Christian0 Rowst Date - Abstract Teleoperation using cameras and monitors fails to achieve the rich and natural perceptions available during direct hands-on operation. Optimally. a reniote telepresence reproduces visual sensations that enable equivalent understanding and interaction as direct operation. Through irnrnersive video acquisition and display. the situational awareness ola remote operator is brought closer lo that of direct operation. Early teleoperation research considered the value of wide tields of view. Howe~er. utilization of wide fields of view meant sacrificing resolution and presenting distorted imagery to the viewer. With recent advances in technology. these problems are no longer barriers to hyper-wide field of view video. Acquisition and display of video conveying the entire surroundings of a tclcoperated mobile robot requires innolwtion of hardware and software.
  • Civilians in Cyberwarfare: Conscripts

    Civilians in Cyberwarfare: Conscripts

    Civilians in Cyberwarfare: Conscripts Susan W. Brenner* with Leo L. Clarke** ABSTRACT Civilian-owned and -operated entities will almost certainly be a target in cyberwarfare because cyberattackers are likely to be more focused on undermining the viability of the targeted state than on invading its territory. Cyberattackers will probably target military computer systems, at least to some extent, but in a departure from traditional warfare, they will also target companies that operate aspects of the victim nation’s infrastructure. Cyberwarfare, in other words, will penetrate the territorial borders of the attacked state and target high-value civilian businesses. Nation-states will therefore need to integrate the civilian employees of these (and perhaps other) companies into their cyberwarfare response structures if a state is to be able to respond effectively to cyberattacks. While many companies may voluntarily elect to participate in such an effort, others may decline to do so, which creates a need, in effect, to conscript companies for this purpose. This Article explores how the U.S. government can go about compelling civilian cooperation in cyberwarfare without violating constitutional guarantees and limitations on the power of the Legislature and the Executive. * NCR Distinguished Professor of Law and Technology, University of Dayton School of Law. ** Associate, Drew, Cooper & Anding, P.C., Grand Rapids, Michigan. 1011 1012 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law [Vol. 43:1011 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................