DOCSLIB.ORG

Global Inventory of AUV and Glider Technology Available for Routine Marine Surveying

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Global Inventory of AUV and Glider Technology Available for Routine Marine Surveying Appendix 1. Global Inventory of AUVs and Gliders Global Inventory of AUV and Glider Technology available for Routine Marine Surveying Project Leaders: Dr Russell Wynn (NOC) and Dr Elizabeth Linley (NERC) Report Prepared by: Dr James Hunt (NOC) Inventory correct as of September 2013 1 Return to Contents Appendix 1. Global Inventory of AUVs and Gliders Contents United Kingdom Institutes ................................................................. 16 Marine Autonomous and Robotic Systems (MARS) at National Oceanography Centre (NOC), Southampton ................................. 17 Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs) at MARS ................................... 18 Autosub3 ...................................................................................................... 18 Technical Specification for Autosub3 ......................................................... 18 Autosub6000 ................................................................................................ 19 Technical Specification .............................................................................. 19 Autosub LR ...................................................................................................... 20 Technical Specification .............................................................................. 20 Air-Launched AUVs ........................................................................................ 21 Gliders at MARS .............................................................................................. 22 Teledyne Webb Slocum Electric Gliders ................................................... 22 Technical Specification (from Teledyne) .................................................... 22 iRobot Seaglider Gliders ............................................................................. 24 Technical Specification (from iRobot) ........................................................ 24 Gliders at British Antarctic Survey (PHOBOS) ............................................. 25 Teledyne Slocum Gliders ............................................................................ 25 iRobot Seaglider .......................................................................................... 25 Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs) at SAMS ................................... 26 REMUS 600 AUV .......................................................................................... 26 Technical Specification (from Hydroid) ...................................................... 26 Gliders at Scottish Marine Institute (NAGB) ................................................. 27 iRobot Seagliders ........................................................................................ 27 University of East Anglia (UEA) ...................................................... 28 Gliders at University of East Anglia (UEA).................................................... 28 Heriot-Watt University ..................................................................... 29 Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs) at Heriot-Watt University ........ 29 REMUS AUV ................................................................................................. 29 Technical Specifications (from Heriot-Watt) ............................................... 29 PAIV (Prototype Autonomous Inspection Vehicle) AUV .......................... 30 2 Return to Contents Appendix 1. Global Inventory of AUVs and Gliders Technical Specification .............................................................................. 30 Nessie IV AUV .............................................................................................. 31 Technical Specification .............................................................................. 31 Nessie 2012 AUV ......................................................................................... 32 Technical Specification .............................................................................. 32 Cambridge University Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (CAUV) 33 United Kingdom Commercial Companies ......................................... 34 Kongsberg Maritime, Norway ......................................................... 35 Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs) at Kongsberg ........................... 35 HUGIN AUVs ................................................................................................ 36 Technical Specification for HUGIN 1000 (from Kongsberg) ....................... 36 Technical Specification for HUGIN 3000 (from Kongsberg) ....................... 37 Technical Specification for HUGIN 4500 (from Kongsberg) ....................... 37 REMUS AUVs ............................................................................................... 38 Technical Specification for REMUS 100 (from Kongsberg Hydroid) .......... 38 Technical Specification for REMUS 100-S (from Kongsberg Hydroid) ....... 39 Technical Specification for REMUS 600 (from Kongsberg Hydroid) .......... 40 Technical Specification for REMUS 600 (from Kongsberg Hydroid) .......... 41 Technical Specification for REMUS 6000 (from Kongsberg Hydroid) ........ 42 NCS Survey ...................................................................................... 44 Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs) at NCS ...................................... 44 ASV unmanned marine Systems .................................................... 45 Unmanned Surface Vehicles at ASV ............................................................. 45 C-Cat 4 Multipurpose Work USV ................................................................ 45 Technical Specification of C-Cat 4 at ASV ................................................. 45 C-Hunter Semi-submersible USV ............................................................... 46 Technical Specification of C-Hunter at ASV ............................................... 46 C-Stat Station Keeping Buoys at USV ....................................................... 46 Technical Specification of C-Stat at ASV ................................................... 46 BAE Systems ................................................................................... 47 AUVs from BAW Systems .............................................................................. 47 Talisman M Configuration........................................................................... 47 Technical Specification for Talisman M (BAE Systems) ............................ 47 3 Return to Contents Appendix 1. Global Inventory of AUVs and Gliders Talisman L Configuration ........................................................................... 47 Technical Specification for Talisman L (BAE Systems) ............................. 47 European Institutes ............................................................................ 48 Marum at University of Bremen ...................................................... 49 Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs) at MUN ...................................... 49 Explorer-class MARUM-SEAL AUV ............................................................ 49 Technical Specification of MARUM-SEAL (from MARUM) ........................ 49 Reykjavik University’s Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (RUAUV) .......................................................................................................... 50 Ecole Nationale Superieure de Techniques Avancees Unit de Mecanique (ENSTA) ......................................................................... 51 Gliders at ENSTA ............................................................................................ 51 Slocum 200 Gliders ..................................................................................... 51 Slocum 1000 Gliders ................................................................................... 51 Spray Glider at ENSTA ................................................................................ 51 Observatoire Oceanoiogique de Villefranc and Laboratoire d’Oceanographie de Villefranc (OOV-LOV) .................................... 52 Gliders at OOV-LOV ........................................................................................ 52 Slocum 1000 Gliders ................................................................................... 52 Laboratoire d’Oceanographie et de Climatologie Experimentations et Approches Numeriques (LOCEAN) ............. 53 Gliders at LOCEAN ......................................................................................... 53 Slocum 200 Glider ....................................................................................... 53 Slocum 1000 Gliders ................................................................................... 53 Spray IRD Glider .......................................................................................... 53 Institute of Marine Sciences at the Christian-Albrechts Universitat zu Kiel (IFM-GEOMAR) .................................................................... 54 AUVs at IFM-GEOMAR .................................................................................... 54 Abyss AUV ................................................................................................... 54 Technical Specification for AUV Abyss (from IFM-GEOMAR) ................... 54 Gliders at GEOMAR ........................................................................................ 54 Slocum Gliders at Geomar ......................................................................... 54 4 Return to Contents Appendix 1. Global Inventory
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Irobot Corporation Irobot Designs, Develops and Sells Robots That Make a Difference
    iRobot Corporation iRobot designs, develops and sells robots that make a difference. iRobot invests significant resources to manufacture, promote and protect its products and related intellectual property. iRobot registered trademarks are protected under U.S. and international law; iRobot reserves the right to bring action against the infringement of legally protected trademarks and products. iRobot regularly monitors the Internet, including auction sites, in order to protect its intellectual property rights. Unauthorized reselling, marketing or auctioning using iRobot copyrighted items is illegal and can result in liability for damages, criminal penalties and termination of eBay selling privileges. iRobot notifies eBay of auction listings containing unauthorized uses of iRobot copyrights and trademarks. eBay complies with iRobot's request by taking appropriate action in accordance to its user policies. This includes the removal of auctions from the eBay website that illegally offer copyrighted terms and products. Only iRobot brand products, as supplied and distributed by iRobot Corporation, and delivered as manufactured, in the carton to the original customer purchaser, is warranted by iRobot Corporation against manufacturing defects in materials and workmanship for the qualifyinglimited warranty period. iRobot Affiliate Program If you are an online retailer and want to earn commission by selling iRobot products on your website, you may opt to participate in the iRobot Affiliate Program. iRobot selects partners based on corporate guidelines and federal law. Through the iRobot Affiliate Program, Approved Affiliates may earn cash by promoting iRobot products on their website by directing consumers from your site to the iRobot Online Store. The program is free to join and easy to use.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Domestic Robot Owners Ja-Young Sung1, Rebecca E
    Housewives or Technophiles?: Understanding Domestic Robot Owners Ja-Young Sung1, Rebecca E. Grinter1, Henrik I. Christensen1, Lan Guo2 1 Center for Robotics and Intelligent Machines 2Siemens Medical Solutions Inc. Georgia Institute of Technology 51 Valley Stream Pkwy 85 5th Street, Atlanta GA 30332 USA Malvern, PA 19355 USA {jsung, beki,hic}@cc.gatech.edu [email protected] ABSTRACT Roomba users. Among other domestic robots that serve household Despite the growing body of Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) tasks, such as Scooba, Robomower and Dressman, we selected research focused on domestic robots, surprisingly little is known Roomba for three main reasons. First, Roomba have been very about the demographic profile of robot owners and their influence successful in the United States and that gave us wide accessibility on usage patterns. In this paper, we present the results of a survey to Roomba owners making it easier to recruit a large sample size. of 379 iRobot’s Roomba owners, that identified their Second, Roomba is one of the longest available domestic robots, demographic and usage trends. The outcome of the survey and we hypothesize that its adoption may have gone beyond suggests that Roomba users are equally likely to be men or “early adopters” or leading users, allowing us to capture a broader women, and they tend to be younger with high levels of education range of experiences. Third, and most importantly, Roomba is an and technical backgrounds. Their adoption and use patterns exemplary case for understanding how householders respond to illustrate the important role that gift exchange plays in adoption, robotic products that replace blue-collar work in the home, which and how the robot changes cleaning routines and creates non- some researchers believe to be the future of home robotic cleaning activities.
    [Show full text]
  • AUV Adaptive Sampling Methods: a Review
    applied sciences Review AUV Adaptive Sampling Methods: A Review Jimin Hwang 1 , Neil Bose 2 and Shuangshuang Fan 3,* 1 Australian Maritime College, University of Tasmania, Launceston 7250, TAS, Australia; [email protected] 2 Department of Ocean and Naval Architectural Engineering, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL A1C 5S7, Canada; [email protected] 3 School of Marine Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519082, Guangdong, China * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 16 July 2019; Accepted: 29 July 2019; Published: 2 August 2019 Abstract: Autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) are unmanned marine robots that have been used for a broad range of oceanographic missions. They are programmed to perform at various levels of autonomy, including autonomous behaviours and intelligent behaviours. Adaptive sampling is one class of intelligent behaviour that allows the vehicle to autonomously make decisions during a mission in response to environment changes and vehicle state changes. Having a closed-loop control architecture, an AUV can perceive the environment, interpret the data and take follow-up measures. Thus, the mission plan can be modified, sampling criteria can be adjusted, and target features can be traced. This paper presents an overview of existing adaptive sampling techniques. Included are adaptive mission uses and underlying methods for perception, interpretation and reaction to underwater phenomena in AUV operations. The potential for future research in adaptive missions is discussed. Keywords: autonomous underwater vehicle(s); maritime robotics; adaptive sampling; underwater feature tracking; in-situ sensors; sensor fusion 1. Introduction Autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) are unmanned marine robots. Owing to their mobility and increased ability to accommodate sensors, they have been used for a broad range of oceanographic missions, such as surveying underwater plumes and other phenomena, collecting bathymetric data and tracking oceanographic dynamic features.
    [Show full text]
  • MODELING, DESIGN and CONTROL of GLIDING ROBOTIC FISH By
    MODELING, DESIGN AND CONTROL OF GLIDING ROBOTIC FISH By Feitian Zhang A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Electrical Engineering – Doctor of Philosophy 2014 ABSTRACT MODELING, DESIGN AND CONTROL OF GLIDING ROBOTIC FISH By Feitian Zhang Autonomous underwater robots have been studied by researchers for the past half century. In particular, for the past two decades, due to the increasing demand for environmental sustainability, significant attention has been paid to aquatic environmental monitoring using autonomous under- water robots. In this dissertation, a new type of underwater robots, gliding robotic fish, is proposed for mobile sensing in versatile aquatic environments. Such a robot combines buoyancy-driven gliding and fin-actuated swimming, inspired by underwater gliders and robotic fish, to realize both energy-efficient locomotion and high maneuverability. Two prototypes, a preliminary miniature underwater glider and a fully functioning gliding robotic fish, are presented. The actuation system and the sensing system are introduced. Dynamic model of a gliding robotic fish is derived by in- tegrating the dynamics of miniature underwater glider and the influence of an actively-controlled tail. Hydrodynamic model is established where hydrodynamic forces and moments are dependent on the angle of attack and the sideslip angle. Using the technique of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) water-tunnel simulation is carried out for evaluating the hydrodynamic coefficients. Scaling analysis is provided to shed light on the dimension design. Two operational modes of gliding robotic fish, steady gliding in the sagittal plane and tail- enabled spiraling in the three-dimensional space, are discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Sharkninja V Irobot Corporation IPR2020-00734
    [email protected] Paper No. 11 571-272-7822 Entered: October 6, 2020 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD SHARKNINJA OPERATING LLC, SHARKNINJA MANAGEMENT LLC, AND SHARKNINJA SALES COMPANY, Petitioner, v. IROBOT CORPORATION, Patent Owner. IPR2020-00734 Patent 9,921,586 B2 Before TERRENCE W. McMILLIN, AMANDA F. WIEKER, and JASON W. MELVIN, Administrative Patent Judges. MELVIN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review 35 U.S.C. § 314 IPR2020-00734 Patent 9,921,586 B2 I. INTRODUCTION SharkNinja Operating LLC, SharkNinja Management LLC, and SharkNinja Sales Company (“Petitioner”) filed a Petition (Paper 1, “Pet.”) requesting institution of inter partes review of claims 1–19 of U.S. Patent No. 9,921,586 B2 (Ex. 1001, “the ’586 patent”). iRobot Corporation (“Patent Owner”) filed a Preliminary Response. Paper 6. After our email authorization, Petitioner filed a Preliminary Reply (Paper 7) and Patent Owner filed a Preliminary Sur-Reply (Paper 9). Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.4(a), we have authority to determine whether to institute review. An inter partes review may not be instituted unless “the information presented in the petition . and any response . shows that there is a reasonable likelihood that the petitioner would prevail with respect to at least 1 of the claims challenged in the petition.” 35 U.S.C. § 314(a). For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that Petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood it will prevail in establishing the unpatentability of at least one challenged claim, and we institute inter partes review.
    [Show full text]
  • Glider Robot a Sleek Ocean Explorer 27 December 2009, by Sandy Bauers
    Glider robot a sleek ocean explorer 27 December 2009, By Sandy Bauers The sea was heaving, the skies gray. The captain surface. of the research ship was worried about the weather. About 120 miles off the coast of Spain, Roemmich works with another project, dubbed three Rutgers University scientists had a narrow Argo, which employs 3,000 buoys worldwide, about window of opportunity to find and retrieve their 180 miles apart, to sample the water column. But prize -- an 8-foot, torpedo-shaped yellow robot that they can only drift. they had launched seven months earlier off the coast of New Jersey. The glider, loaded with data sensors, can be directed. They could grab it and learn from it, or in the rough seas accidentally ram it and sink it. "We are data poor for understanding how the ocean operates, and this is going to give us the capability After an hour of pitching in the 20-foot waves, the to understand this much better," said Richard shipmates let out a cheer. Having spent 221 days Spinrad, assistant administrator of the National at sea on a voyage of 4,604 miles, the robot Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in Silver dubbed Scarlet Knight was safely aboard. Spring, Md. With that came the completion of a mission that "If we can go across the Atlantic, we can go just made oceanographic history. about anywhere with these." Not only was the robot -- an underwater glider -- And what a way to go. the first of its ilk to cross the Atlantic, a mission supporters compared to Sputnik and Charles For its long, solo flights, the glider needs to be a Lindbergh's solo flight.
    [Show full text]
  • And Financial Implications of Unmanned
    Disruptive Innovation and Naval Power: Strategic and Financial Implications of Unmanned Underwater Vehicles (UUVs) and Long-term Underwater Power Sources MASSACHUsf TTT IMef0hrE OF TECHNOLOGY by Richard Winston Larson MAY 0 8 201 S.B. Engineering LIBRARIES Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2012 Submitted to the Department of Mechanical Engineering in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY February 2014 © Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2014. All rights reserved. 2) Author Dep.atment of Mechanical Engineering nuaryL5.,3014 Certified by.... Y Douglas P. Hart Professor of Mechanical Engineering Tbesis Supervisor A ccepted by ....................... ........ David E. Hardt Ralph E. and Eloise F. Cross Professor of Mechanical Engineering 2 Disruptive Innovation and Naval Power: Strategic and Financial Implications of Unmanned Underwater Vehicles (UUVs) and Long-term Underwater Power Sources by Richard Winston Larson Submitted to the Department of Mechanical Engineering on January 15, 2014, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering Abstract The naval warfare environment is rapidly changing. The U.S. Navy is adapting by continuing its blue-water dominance while simultaneously building brown-water ca- pabilities. Unmanned systems, such as unmanned airborne drones, are proving piv- otal in facing new battlefield challenges. Unmanned underwater vehicles (UUVs) are emerging as the Navy's seaborne equivalent of the Air Force's drones. Representing a low-end disruptive technology relative to traditional shipborne operations, UUVs are becoming capable of taking on increasingly complex roles, tipping the scales of battlefield entropy. They improve mission outcomes and operate for a fraction of the cost of traditional operations.
    [Show full text]
  • A Multi-Level Motion Controller for Low-Cost Underwater Gliders
    2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) Washington State Convention Center Seattle, Washington, May 26-30, 2015 A Multi-level Motion Controller for Low-Cost Underwater Gliders Guilherme Aramizo Ribeiro, Anthony Pinar, Eric Wilkening, Saeedeh Ziaeefard, and Nina Mahmoudian Abstract— An underwater glider named ROUGHIE (Research deploying UGs [23] for submarine tracking. With a valida- Oriented Underwater Glider for Hands-on Investigative Engineer- tion platform, researchers will be able to better understand ing) is designed and manufactured to provide a test platform and glider dynamics [24] and improve UG effectiveness in littoral framework for experimental underwater automation. This paper presents an efficient multi-level motion controller that can be used zones. Additionally, underwater localization and positioning to enhance underwater glider control systems or easily modified and path planning in high risk areas will be improved. for additional sensing, computing, or other requirements for ROUGHIE is 1 m long and weighs 12 kg (payload 1 kg) advanced automation design testing.The ultimate goal is to have with minimum operating endurance of 8 hours and maximum a fleet of modular and inexpensive test platforms for addressing depth of 40 m. At 10% of the cost of commercial underwater the issues that currently limit the use of autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs). Producing a low-cost vehicle with maneuvering gliders, a ROUGHIE fleet is affordable without compromis- capabilities and a straightforward expansion path will permit easy ing the sophisticated control systems and maneuverability experimentation and testing of different approaches to improve (See the detailed characteristics in Table I). underwater automation. In this paper, the mechanical and electrical components of the ROUGHIE are introduced in Section I as a plant for the INTRODUCTION controller design.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Robotics: Timeline
    History of Robotics: Timeline This history of robotics is intertwined with the histories of technology, science and the basic principle of progress. Technology used in computing, electricity, even pneumatics and hydraulics can all be considered a part of the history of robotics. The timeline presented is therefore far from complete. Robotics currently represents one of mankind’s greatest accomplishments and is the single greatest attempt of mankind to produce an artificial, sentient being. It is only in recent years that manufacturers are making robotics increasingly available and attainable to the general public. The focus of this timeline is to provide the reader with a general overview of robotics (with a focus more on mobile robots) and to give an appreciation for the inventors and innovators in this field who have helped robotics to become what it is today. RobotShop Distribution Inc., 2008 www.robotshop.ca www.robotshop.us Greek Times Some historians affirm that Talos, a giant creature written about in ancient greek literature, was a creature (either a man or a bull) made of bronze, given by Zeus to Europa. [6] According to one version of the myths he was created in Sardinia by Hephaestus on Zeus' command, who gave him to the Cretan king Minos. In another version Talos came to Crete with Zeus to watch over his love Europa, and Minos received him as a gift from her. There are suppositions that his name Talos in the old Cretan language meant the "Sun" and that Zeus was known in Crete by the similar name of Zeus Tallaios.
    [Show full text]
  • Wednesday Morning, 30 November 2016 Lehua, 8:00 A.M
    WEDNESDAY MORNING, 30 NOVEMBER 2016 LEHUA, 8:00 A.M. TO 9:05 A.M. Session 3aAAa Architectural Acoustics and Speech Communication: At the Intersection of Speech and Architecture II Kenneth W. Good, Cochair Armstrong, 2500 Columbia Ave., Lancaster, PA 17601 Takashi Yamakawa, Cochair Yamaha Corporation, 10-1 Nakazawa-cho, Naka-ku, Hamamatsu 430-8650, Japan Catherine L. Rogers, Cochair Dept. of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Florida, USF, 4202 E. Fowler Ave., PCD1017, Tampa, FL 33620 Chair’s Introduction—8:00 Invited Papers 8:05 3aAAa1. Vocal effort and fatigue in virtual room acoustics. Pasquale Bottalico, Lady C. Cantor Cutiva, and Eric J. Hunter (Commu- nicative Sci. and Disord., Michigan State Univ., 1026 Red Cedar Rd., Lansing, MI 48910, [email protected]) Vocal effort is a physiological entity that accounts for changes in voice production as vocal loading increases, which can be quanti- fied in terms of Sound Pressure Level (SPL). It may have implications on potential vocal fatigue risk factors. This study investigates how vocal effort is affected by room acoustics. The changes in the acoustic conditions were artificially manipulated. Thirty-nine subjects were recorded while reading a text, 15 out of them used a conversational style while 24 were instructed to read as if they were in a class- room full of children. Each subject was asked to read in three different reverberation time RT (0.4 s, 0.8 s, and 1.2 s), in two noise condi- tions (background noise at 25 dBA and Babble noise at 61 dBA), in three different auditory feedback levels (-5 dB, 0 dB, and 5 dB), for a total of 18 tasks per subject presented in a random order.
    [Show full text]
  • Navegación Y Control De Un Mini Veh´Iculo Submarino Autónomo
    CENTRO DE INVESTIGACION´ Y DE ESTUDIOS AVANZADOS DEL INSTITUTO POLITECNICO´ NACIONAL UNIDAD ZACATENCO DEPARTAMENTO DE CONTROL AUTOMATICO´ Navegaci´on y control de un mini veh´ıculo submarino aut´onomo TESIS Que presenta M. en C. Iv´an Torres Tamanaja Para obtener el grado de DOCTOR EN CIENCIAS EN LA ESPECIALIDAD DE CONTROL AUTOMATICO´ Directores de Tesis: Dr. Jorge Antonio Torres Mu˜noz Dr. Rogelio Lozano Leal MEXICO´ DISTRITO FEDERAL AGOSTO DEL 2013. El riego de nadar entre tiburones, no son los tiburones. El verdadero riesgo es sangrar mientras lo haces. (I.T.T.) A la memoria de mi Chan´ın. Q.E.P.D. Dedicatoria A mis padres: Sa´ul Torres Jim´enez Guillermina Tamanaja Ram´ırez Por su palabras de aliento, por la confianza que siempre me han dado, porque son el refugio en mis momentos de duda, porque con nada pago el gran amor y cari˜no que me profesan sin esperar nada a cambio. Por ser una gu´ıa, ejemplo y motor impulsor en mi vida. A mis hermanas: Ivonne e Ivette Qu´epor todo y sobre todo han mostrado ser las mejores hermanas, porque demuestran su afecto y cari˜no con las cosas m´as b´asicas. A mis sobrinos: Iv´an Santiago David Con sus sonrisas me recuerdan que la vida es un juego. Agradecimientos A Dios, que me da la oportunidad de abrir los ojos a un nuevo d´ıatodos los d´ıas. Al CONACYT, por otorgarme una beca para poder realizar mis estudios de docto- rado. Al Dr. Pedro Castillo Garcia, que con su estilo muy particular de aconsejar..
    [Show full text]
  • Robotics Irobot Corp. (IRBT)
    Robotics This report is published for educational purposes only by students competing in the Boston Security Analysts Society (BSAS) Boston Investment iRobot Corp. (IRBT) Research Challenge. 12/13/2010 Ticker: IRBT Recommendation: Sell Price: $22.84 Price Target: $15.20-16.60 Market Profile Figure 1.1: iRobot historical stock price Shares O/S 25 mm 25 Current price $22.84 52 wk price range $14.45-$23.00 20 Beta 1.86 iRobot 3 mo ADTV 0.14 mm 15 Short interest 2.1 mm Market cap $581mm 10 Debt 0 S & P 500 (benchmarked Jan-09) P/10E 25.2x 5 EV/10 EBITDA 13.5x Instl holdings 57.8% 0 Jan-09 Apr-09 Jul-09 Oct-09 Jan-10 Apr-10 Jul-10 Oct-10 Insider holdings 12.5% Valuation Ranges iRobot is a SELL: The company’s high valuation reflects overly optimistic expectations for home and military robot sales. While we are bullish on robotics, iRobot’s 52 wk range growth story has run out of steam. • Consensus is overestimating future home robot sales: Rapid yoy growth in 2010 home robot Street targets sales is the result of one-time penetration of international markets, which has concealed declining domestic sales. Entry into new markets drove growth in home robot sales in Q4 2009 and Q1 2010, 20-25x P/2011E but international sales have fallen 4% since Q1 this year, and we believe the street is overestimating international growth in 2011 (30% vs. our estimate of 18%). Domestic sales were down 29% in 8-12x Terminal 2009 and are up only 2.5% ytd.
    [Show full text]