The Tuscarora War: Indians, Settlers, and the Fight for the Carolina Colonies

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Tuscarora War: Indians, Settlers, and the Fight for the Carolina Colonies David La Vere. The Tuscarora War: Indians, Settlers, and the Fight for the Carolina Colonies. Chapel Hill: University Of North Carolina Press, 2013. 272 pp. $30.00, cloth, ISBN 978-1-4696-1090-0. Reviewed by Ethan A. Schmidt Published on H-AmIndian (March, 2015) Commissioned by F. Evan Nooe (University of North Carolina, Charlotte) The Yamasee War of the early eighteenth cen‐ as intercolonial and Native politics. Finally, La tury has become a very popular historical topic of Vere achieves a very welcome balance between late and has fgured prominently in some excel‐ erudition and readability that eludes many but lent work on the colonial South by such scholars the most practiced writers of early American eth‐ as Allan Gallay, William Ramsey, and Paul Kelton, nohistory. to name but a few. However, this renaissance of La Vere tells the story of the Tuscarora War interest in that conflict, which raged mainly in the by devoting separate chapters to the lives of seven Carolinas from 1715 to 1717, has, for the most of its most important participants. In the frst full part, treated the Tuscarora War immediately pre‐ chapter, he chronicles the life of the baron ceding it in that same region as simply a prologue Christoper de Graffenried, the cash poor Swiss no‐ or precursory chapter. David La Vere’s The Tus‐ bleman who dreamt of the redemption of both his carora War: Indians, Settlers, and the Fight for family fortune and the lives of the dissenting the Carolina Colonies largely renders such an act Swiss and German indigents he had led to North impossible in the future. Carolina in 1710. Unfortunately, for both de Graf‐ As one of the few (if not the only) full-length fenried and his New Bern settlement, he was easi‐ monographs in over a century to focus solely on ly rooked. For despite the assurances of North the Tuscarora War, this volume contains tremen‐ Carolina surveyor general John Lawson that the dous value simply for its account of the war’s land he and the colony’s proprietors had sold de causes, its major events, and its repercussions. Graffenried was indeed free and clear of any oth‐ The value of La Vere’s work does not end there. er encumbrances, the baron soon discovered that The Tuscarora War also provides valuable in‐ he had seated his settlement in the midst of lands sights into ethnic, religious, and class tensions in claimed by the Tuscaroras and their allies. Never‐ early eighteenth-century North Carolina as well theless, de Graffenried pressed on with the busi‐ H-Net Reviews ness of creating what he viewed as nothing short make. These men often took advantage of dis‐ of a feudal state with him as lord of the manor. putes with Indians to further their fortunes. La Early on, it seemed as if his dream might actually Vere’s third chapter profiles one such colonist in come to fruition and for a time the colony thrived. the person of William Brice. Brice, a longstanding However, that early success prompted both Law‐ rogue with a penchant for abusing Indians and son and de Graffenried to reach too far. When pilfering their land, soon took over the leadership they embarked on a journey up the Neuse River of North Carolina’s defenses. Though he met with in September of 1711 to fnd lands suitable for the mixed success in his attempts to actually defeat colony’s expansion, they were captured by war‐ the Tuscaroras, Brice’s real motivation seems to riors from the nearby Tuscarora town of Catchena have been nothing more than the procurement of where they would eventually be sentenced to Indian captives to sell into slavery, and at this ob‐ death for their role in the dispossession of Tus‐ jective he excelled much to the approval of many carora land. While de Graffenried would eventu‐ of his fellow colonists and the chagrin of leaders, ally be spared execution, Lawson, who had de‐ such as de Graffenried, who sought a negotiated frauded the Tuscaroras as well as their allies of peace to the conflict. land on more than one occasion, was not so fortu‐ The next two chapters detail the intercolonial nate. His subsequent death and the attacks of the rivalries and political intrigue endemic to all in‐ Tuscaroras and their allies against North Carolina teractions between England’s North American settlements immediately following sparked the colonies. Utilizing South Carolina colonel John Tuscarora War. Barnwell and North Carolina Council president The second chapter explains the role played Thomas Pollock, La Vere demonstrates the way in by internal Tuscarora politics in the decisions which the tactics and strategy of both Carolina both to execute Lawson and to strike the North colonies were more often determined by the de‐ Carolina settlements. La Vere uses the opposing sire of their respective governments to outdo the Tuscarora leaders King Hancock, an older and other and by the personal whims of those they more accommodationist leader, and Core Tom, a placed in command of their expeditions. The out‐ younger man more in tune with the desires of come of all of this was a series of failed campaigns Tuscarora warriors, to peer into the group’s inner and sieges which ended in defeat more than once deliberations. In the end, a combination of abuse for Barnwell and prompted him to sign a peace by traders, the effects of the Indian slave trade, treaty with the Tuscaroras, which he then imme‐ disease epidemics, and the encouragement of diately broke either at the behest of such North their Seneca kinsmen from New York created a Carolinians as Pollock who felt it akin to an ad‐ groundswell of support for action against English mission of defeat or because he (Barnwell) gave in colonialism. In a political system based heavily on to his desire to take Indian captives home with the idea of consensus, those who disagreed with him to sell as slaves. Either way, what might possi‐ the stance of the younger warriors were honor bly have been the beginnings of a peaceful resolu‐ bound to throw their lot in with those clamoring tion to the conflict was swept away by the vanity, for war. Therefore, even the most staunch accom‐ greed, and bloodlust of those in the leadership of modationist leaders (such as King Hancock) could both the North Carolina government and its mili‐ not hope to hold out against the will of his people tary allies. if he hoped to retain his authority. As much as anything, Virginia governor Much like Virginia during the previous centu‐ Alexander Spotswood’s refusal to militarily sup‐ ry, North Carolina was a paradise for men on the port the North Carolina government while also 2 H-Net Reviews cutting the Old Dominion’s trade ties with the Tus‐ Yamasee War. It is on the whole a very successful caroras did as much as anything to end the war. work of history. However, there are a few minor Virginia’s refusal to trade with them forced those issues which even the most supportive of readers Tuscaroras who were either opposed to the war cannot fail to notice. The smallest of which relates or at best lukewarm supporters to eventually directly to La Vere’s writing style. While on the abandon their more militant brethren altogether. whole, his prose is highly readable and exciting, On the other hand, the withdrawal of South Car‐ there are sections in which the delivery comes off olina forces under Barnwell coupled with as rather formulaic and simplistic. Those sections Spotswood’s reluctance to commit Virginia troops read much more like tropes from Hollywood de‐ forced North Carolina leaders, such as Pollock, to pictions of Indian/settler contact or fanciful Eng‐ consider a negotiated settlement once again. It lish popular writings of the era rather than the was at this point, however, that a new force of analysis required of the modern-day historian. South Carolinians, this time under the command Granted, these instances are few and far between, of Colonel James Moore, arrived in the colony and but their appearance is jarring nonetheless. On forced the remaining Tuscarora holdouts to the the other hand, La Vere’s choice of organizational table. La Vere uses the personas of the Tuscarora schema represents a much greater issue. As stated negotiator King Tom Blount and Moore to relate above, La Vere chose to organize the book as a se‐ this sequence of events over the last two major ries of mini-biographies of the Tuscarora War’s chapters of the volume. major fgures. However, the story of the war can‐ In a concluding chapter, La Vere provides his not be contained within the confines of such a assessment of the results of the confict. He writes, narrow organizational framework and therefore “the war broke the power of the Tuscaroras and each chapter contains long stretches in which the other eastern Indians and allowed the colony to supposed central object of analysis does not even expand west and south at a phenomenal rate” (p. appear. For example, Brice is mentioned in the 206). Additionally, he concludes that while the first paragraph of the chapter that bears his war temporarily united warring factions within name, but then promptly disappears for ffteen the colony’s government, its end brought about pages of a twenty-six-page chapter. In reality, the downfall of the religious dissenters (mainly what La Vere has done is to provide an excellent Quakers) who had exerted considerable power in chronological account of the Tuscarora War, yet the years prior to the war and strengthened the he forced that chronological account into a bio‐ hold of those politicians friendly to the original graphical framework.
Recommended publications
  • The Indian Trade War Reconsidered: Morris on Ivers
    Larry E. Ivers. This Torrent of Indians: War on the Southern Frontier, 1715-1728. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 2016. 292 pp. $24.95, paper, ISBN 978-1-61117-606-3. Reviewed by Michael Morris Published on H-SC (September, 2016) Commissioned by David W. Dangerfield (University of South Carolina - Salkehatchie) If South Carolina’s Yamasee War is ever given tribes and forgotten forts. His secondary works a subtitle, it could rightly be called the Great Indi‐ run the gamut from Verner Crane's 1959 classic, an Trade War. Larry Ivers, a lawyer by training The Southern Frontier to William Ramsey's 2008 with a military background, notes in his preface work, The Yamasee War. that his intent was to fll a void in the history of The frst three chapters set the stage for con‐ the Yamasee War and to provide a more detailed flict by discussing the Indian agents and traders analysis of the military operations of the war. To who caused the crisis by enslavement of debtor that end, he clearly succeeds in recreating the sto‐ Indians, and one of its strengths is naming people ry of a colony at war aggravated by professional who are otherwise shadowy fgures in backcoun‐ Indian traders who trafficked in Indian slaves to try history. The Yamasee leadership clearly pay their debts. Ivers reveals an incredibly de‐ warned traders Samuel Warner and William Bray tailed account of the debacle and this detailed of a planned murder of all traders and an attack analysis is both a major strength and a minor on the colony if the South Carolina government weakness of the work.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of an Eighteenth-Century Yamasee Mission Community in Colonial St Augustine Andrea Paige White College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 2002 Living on the Periphery: A Study of an Eighteenth-Century Yamasee Mission Community in Colonial St Augustine andrea Paige White College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Indigenous Studies Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation White, andrea Paige, "Living on the Periphery: A Study of an Eighteenth-Century Yamasee Mission Community in Colonial St Augustine" (2002). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539626354. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-whwd-r651 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LIVING ON THE PERIPHERY: A STUDY OF AN EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY YAMASEE MISSION COMMUNITY IN COLONIAL ST. AUGUSTINE A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Anthropology The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Andrea P. White 2002 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of The requirements for the degree of aster of Arts Author Approved, November 2002 n / i i WJ m Norman Barka Carl Halbirt City Archaeologist, St. Augustine, FL Theodore Reinhart TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS vi LIST OF TABLES viii LIST OF FIGURES ix ABSTRACT xi CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 2 Creolization Models in Historical Archaeology 4 Previous Archaeological Work on the Yamasee and Significance of La Punta 7 PROJECT METHODS 10 Historical Sources 10 Research Design and The City of St.
    [Show full text]
  • AP US History Opportunity and Oppression in Colonial Society 1
    AP US History Opportunity and Oppression in Colonial Society 1. The system of indentured labor used during the Colonial period had which of the following effects? A. It enabled England to deport most criminals. B. It enabled poor people to seek opportunity in America. C. It delayed the establishment of slavery in the South until about 1750. D. It facilitated the cultivation of cotton in the South. E. It instituted social equality. 2. Indentured servants were usually A. slaves who had been emancipated by their masters B. free blacks forced to sell themselves into slavery by economic conditions. C. paroled prisoners bound to a lifetime of service in the colonies D. persons who voluntarily bound themselves to labor for a set number of years in return for transportation in the colonies. E. the sons and daughters of slaves. 3. The headright system adopted in the Virginia colony A. determined the eligibility of a settler for voting and holding office. B. toughened the laws applying to indentured servants. C. gave 50 acres of land to anyone who would transport himself to the colony. D. encouraged the development of urban centers. E. prohibited the settlement of single men and women in the colony. 4. Of the African slaves brought to the New World by Europeans from 1492 through 1770, the vast majority were shipped to A Virginia B the Carolinas C the Caribbean D Georgia E Florida 5. A majority of the early English migrants to the Chesapeake were A. Families with young children B. Indentured servants C. Wealthy gentlemen D. Merchants and craftsmen E.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuscarora Trails: Indian Migrations, War, and Constructions of Colonial Frontiers
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 2007 Tuscarora trails: Indian migrations, war, and constructions of colonial frontiers Stephen D. Feeley College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Indigenous Studies Commons, Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Feeley, Stephen D., "Tuscarora trails: Indian migrations, war, and constructions of colonial frontiers" (2007). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539623324. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-4nn0-c987 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Tuscarora Trails: Indian Migrations, War, and Constructions of Colonial Frontiers Volume I Stephen Delbert Feeley Norcross, Georgia B.A., Davidson College, 1996 M.A., The College of William and Mary, 2000 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the College of William and Mary in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Lyon Gardiner Tyler Department of History The College of William and Mary May, 2007 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. APPROVAL SHEET This dissertation is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Stephen Delbert F eele^ -^ Approved by the Committee, January 2007 MIL James Axtell, Chair Daniel K. Richter McNeil Center for Early American Studies 11 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • An Educator's Guide to the Story of North Carolina
    Story of North Carolina – Educator’s Guide An Educator’s Guide to The Story of North Carolina An exhibition content guide for teachers covering the major themes and subject areas of the museum’s exhibition The Story of North Carolina. Use this guide to help create lesson plans, plan a field trip, and generate pre- and post-visit activities. This guide contains recommended lessons by the UNC Civic Education Consortium (available at http://database.civics.unc.edu/), inquiries aligned to the C3 Framework for Social Studies, and links to related primary sources available in the Library of Congress. Updated Fall 2016 1 Story of North Carolina – Educator’s Guide The earth was formed about 4,500 million years (4.5 billion years) ago. The landmass under North Carolina began to form about 1,700 million years ago, and has been in constant change ever since. Continents broke apart, merged, then drifted apart again. After North Carolina found its present place on the eastern coast of North America, the global climate warmed and cooled many times. The first single-celled life-forms appeared as early as 3,800 million years ago. As life-forms grew more complex, they diversified. Plants and animals became distinct. Gradually life crept out from the oceans and took over the land. The ancestors of humans began to walk upright only a few million years ago, and our species, Homo sapiens, emerged only about 120,000 years ago. The first humans arrived in North Carolina approximately 14,000 years ago—and continued the process of environmental change through hunting, agriculture, and eventually development.
    [Show full text]
  • Catawba Militarism: Ethnohistorical and Archaeological Overviews
    CATAWBA MILITARISM: ETHNOHISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL OVERVIEWS by Charles L. Heath Abstract While many Indian societies in the Carolinas disappeared into the multi-colored fabric of Southern history before the mid-1700s, the Catawba Nation emerged battered, but ethnically viable, from the chaos of their colonial experience. Later, the Nation’s people managed to circumvent Removal in the 1830s and many of their descendants live in the traditional Catawba homeland today. To achieve this distinction, colonial and antebellum period Catawba leaders actively affected the cultural survival of their people by projecting a bellicose attitude and strategically promoting Catawba warriors as highly desired military auxiliaries, or “ethnic soldiers,” of South Carolina’s imperial and state militias after 1670. This paper focuses on Catawba militarism as an adaptive strategy and further elaborates on the effects of this adaptation on Catawba society, particularly in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. While largely ethnohistorical in content, potential archaeological aspects of Catawba militarism are explored to suggest avenues for future research. American Indian societies in eastern North America responded to European imperialism in countless ways. Although some societies, such as the Powhatans and the Yamassees (Gleach 1997; Lee 1963), attempted to aggressively resist European hegemony by attacking their oppressors, resistance and adaptation took radically different forms in a colonial world oft referred to as a “tribal zone,” a “shatter zone,” or the “violent edge of empire” (Ethridge 2003; Ferguson and Whitehead 1999a, 1999b). Perhaps unique among their indigenous contemporaries in the Carolinas, the ethnically diverse peoples who came to form the “Catawba Nation” (see Davis and Riggs this volume) proactively sought to ensure their socio- political and cultural survival by strategically positioning themselves on the southern Anglo-American frontier as a militaristic society of “ethnic soldiers” (see Ferguson and Whitehead 1999a, 1999b).
    [Show full text]
  • Tuscarora-War.Pdf
    Cultures Clash CHERAW WEAPEMEOC SAPONI (P (POTESKEET) Albemarle County ASQUOT European Settlement Pushes (YEOPIM the Tuscarora Nation to the Roanoke ANK) SHAKORI CHOWANOC ) Breaking Point River ENO R. Edenton Yadkin UPPER 1710 Albemarle Sound KEYAUWEE SISSIPAHAW TUSCARORA F r e n c MORATOK (ROANOAK) h Catawba B SECOTAN r o Bath County a d (MACHAPUNGO) R Torhunta CATAWBA Cape Ft. Neoheroka Bath i V v V V V Ft. Hancock e 1690 r R. Fear CHEROKEE Catechna Pamlico R. R. d (HATTERAS) TUSCARORA POMOUIK un SUGEREE Ft. So Barnwell Barnwell New Bern lico (Narhantes) am WAXHAW and 1710 P Cape T Moore rent R. R. Hatteras Expeditions Neuse WATEREE NEUSIOK (COREE) Beaufort 1715 THE TUSCARORA WAR — Main Events Cape Lookout 1710 WACCAMAW Colonial town of New Bern displaces Tuscarora village of Chattoka Clarendon County PRINCIPAL INDIAN TRIBES Wilmington From The Way We Lived in North Carolina 1711 Ca. 1600-1700, in addition to 1733 © 2003 The University of North Carolina Press Mid-September — John Lawson is executed near the village of Catechna Tuscarora. (Eastern tribes largely CAPE FEAR Map © North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources September 22 — Tuscarora Indians, in alliance with members of displaced displaced by white settlers.) All rights reserved. coastal tribes, attack colonists along the Neuse, Pamlico, and Trent Rivers Cape Fear October 27 —South Carolina resolves to raise troops to fight the Tuscaroras Forts Brunswick Town 1725 Indian Woods 1712 Reservation established in 1717 January 28 — The Barnwell Expedition crosses the Cape Fear River for Tuscarora remaining in North Carolina following the war of January 30 — Barnwell’s force destroys the Tuscarora village of Narhantes 1711-1713.
    [Show full text]
  • The Yamasee War: 1715 - 1717
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Archaeology and Anthropology, South Carolina Archaeology Month Posters Institute of 10-2015 The aY masee War: 1715 - 1717 South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology--University of South Carolina Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/archmonth_poster Part of the Anthropology Commons Publication Info Published in 2015. South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology--University of South Carolina. Archaeology Month Poster - The aY masee War: 1715 - 1717, 2015. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina, South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology, 2015. http://artsandsciences.sc.edu/sciaa/ © 2015 by University of South Carolina, South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology This Poster is brought to you by the Archaeology and Anthropology, South Carolina Institute of at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Archaeology Month Posters by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE YAMASEE WAR: 1715 - 1717 Thomas Nairne, “A map of South Carolina shewing the settlements of the English, French, & Indian nations from Charles Town to the River Missisipi [sic].” 1711. From Edward Crisp, “A compleat description of the province of Carolina in 3 parts.” Photo courtesy of Library of Congress 24th Annual South Carolina Archaeology Month October 2015 USC • South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology • 1321 Pendleton Street • Columbia S
    [Show full text]
  • Wiest Must Have War and Society List
    War and Society Graduate Reading List Drs. Allison Abra, Mao Lin, Heather M. Stur, Kenneth Swope, Susannah Ural, Andrew A. Wiest, & Kyle F. Zelner NOTE: In addition to the titles listed below, students should familiarize themselves with the important journals in the field, especially The Journal of Military History and War & Society, in addition to relevant articles in more general history journals. VALID DATES: Approved for students entering program in 2010 and forward (or by agreement with faculty advisor). * designates a classic, must-read, essential work. (67 total) ************************************************************************************* HISTORIOGRAPHICAL WORKS: The following—required—historiographical works offer students a firm understanding of current issues in the field of war and society: *Black, Jeremy. Rethinking Military History. New York: Routledge, 2004. *Citino, Robert M. “Military Histories Old and New: A Reintroduction.” American Historical Review 112, no. 4 (2007): 1070-1090. *Grenier, John. “Recent Trends in the Historiography on Warfare in the Colonial Period (1607-1765)” History Compass 8 no. 4 (2010): 358-367. *Hughes, Matthew and William Philpott, eds. Palgrave Advances in Modern Military Histor. New York: Palgrave Macmillian, 2007. *Kohn, Richard H., “The Social History of the American Soldier: A Review and Prospectus for Research.” American Historical Review 86, no. 3 (1981): 553-67. *Lee, Wayne E. “Early American Ways of War: A New Reconnaissance, 1600-1815.” The Historical Journal 44, no. 1 (2001): 269-289. *Lee, Wayne E. “Mind and Matter - Cultural Analysis in American Military History: A Look at the State of the Field.” Journal of American History 93, no. 4 (2007): 1116-1142. *Linn, Brian McAllister. “‘The American Way of War’ Revisited.” Journal of Military History 66, no.
    [Show full text]
  • Violence and the Socio-Political Growth of Colonial South Carolina and Georgia, 1690-1776
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University History Dissertations Department of History 12-10-2018 Demons of Discord: Violence and the Socio-political Growth of Colonial South Carolina and Georgia, 1690-1776 Corrie N. Hand-Stephenson Georgia State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_diss Recommended Citation Hand-Stephenson, Corrie N., "Demons of Discord: Violence and the Socio-political Growth of Colonial South Carolina and Georgia, 1690-1776." Dissertation, Georgia State University, 2018. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_diss/71 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of History at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DEMONS OF DISCORD: VIOLENCE AND THE SOCIO-POLITICAL GROWTH OF COLONIAL SOUTH CAROLINA AND GEORGIA, 1690-1776 by CORRIE HAND-STEPHENSON Under the Direction of Charles Steffen, PhD ABSTRACT Life in the colonial American south was filled with brutality and inequality. Whether it was the violence of slavery and colonial expansion or the inherent inequalities of gender relations, violence and oppression permeated nearly every facet of life. This dissertation will look critically at the development of what I am calling a culture of violence in the colonies of Georgia and South Carolina. By studying the ways in which violence effected family, social, and political interactions, my work argues that the crucible of social, racial, and political issues of these two colonies created a culture in which violence or the threat of violence permeated most human interactions.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Pageant, Fifteenth Edition
    Chapter 2 The Planting of English rAmerica 1500–1733 . For I shall yet live to see it [Virginia] an Inglishe nation. Sir Walter raleigh, 1602 s the seventeenth century dawned, scarcely Roman Catholic Church in the 1530s, launching the a hundred years after Columbus’s momentous English Protestant Reformation. Catholics bat- Alandfall, the face of much of the New World had already tled Protestants for decades, and the religious balance been profoundly transformed. European crops and live- of power seesawed. But after the Protestant Elizabeth stock had begun to alter the very landscape, touching ascended to the English throne in 1558, Protestantism off an ecological revolution that would reverberate for became dominant in England, and rivalry with Catho- centuries to come. From Tierra del Fuego in the south lic Spain intensified. to Hudson Bay in the north, disease and armed con- Ireland, which nominally had been under English quest had cruelly winnowed and disrupted the native rule since the twelfth century, became an early scene of peoples. Several hundred thousand enslaved Africans that rivalry. The Catholic Irish sought help from Catho- toiled on Caribbean and Brazilian sugar plantations. lic Spain to throw off the yoke of the new Protestant Eng- From Florida and New Mexico southward, most of the lish queen. But Spanish aid never amounted to much; New World lay firmly within the grip of imperial Spain. in the 1570s and 1580s, Elizabeth’s troops crushed the But north of Mexico, America in 1600 remained Irish uprising with terrible ferocity, inflicting unspeak- largely unexplored and effectively unclaimed by Euro- able atrocities upon the native Irish people.
    [Show full text]
  • Warren R. Hofstra's Book, the Planting of New Virginia: Settlement
    Warren R. Hofstra’s book, The Planting of New Virginia: Settlement and Landscape in the Shenandoah Valley is the product of years of assiduous scholarship. Hofstra traces the evolution of the Shenandoah Valley during the eighteenth century. In the early 1700s, the valley was unsettled but contested by Native Americans. Beginning in the 1730s, European settlement created a region of dispersed private farms. The Seven Years War stimulated the economy of Winchester, which became a garrison town, and paved the way for the transition to a town and country landscape that produced wheat for the Atlantic commercial economy. In charting these changes, Hofstra demonstrates what was unique about the valley but also how its pattern of evolution was replicated as Americans moved westward during the nineteenth century. To some degree, similar developments occurred in South Carolina. In 1731, shortly after the disastrous Yamasee war, the English Board of Trade authorized the colony’s first royal governor, Robert Johnson, to establish townships along colony’s frontier. Johnson and his superiors envisioned a landscape of towns and small family farms, a protective barrier against Indian threats on the frontier and slave rebellions by the black majority in the Carolina lowcountry. Subsidized by the colony’s government, the region attracted German Lutherans, French Huguenots, and Welsh Baptists. Situated below the fall line, this first layer of backcountry settlement eventually became known as the middlecountry. The purposes of South Carolina’s inland towns, as well as their ethnic and religious diversity, mirrored the early settlement of the Shenandoah Valley described by Hofstra. In addition to concerns for South Carolina’s security, the Board of Trade was alarmed that English settlement would be hemmed in by the French, who threatened to 2 extend their reach from Canada to Louisiana.
    [Show full text]