An Educator's Guide to the Story of North Carolina
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Lake James State Park General Management Plan
Lake James State Park General Management Plan North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Division of Parks and Recreation Mountain Region February 2017 I. MISSION & PURPOSE MISSION STATEMENT: Conservation: To protect North Carolina’s natural diversity through careful selection and stewardship of state parks system lands; Recreation: To provide and promote outdoor recreation opportunities in the state parks system and throughout the state; and Education: To encourage appreciation of North Carolina’s natural and cultural heritage through diverse educational opportunities; for all citizens of and visitors to the State of North Carolina. Our purpose: The 1987 State Parks Act defines the purposes of the state parks system. It establishes that: The State of North Carolina offers unique archaeologic, geologic, biologic, scenic and recreational resources. These resources are part of the heritage of the people of this State. The heritage of a people should be preserved and managed by those people for their use and for the use of their visitors and descendants. PARK PURPOSE: Lake James was developed for hydroelectric purposes by Duke Power Company in 1923. Lake James State Park was established in 1987, becoming the first North Carolina State Park created under the provisions of the State Parks Act of 1987. It is also the first park in the history of the state to receive funds for acquisition, development, and operation upon its creation. The park serves residents and visitors of North Carolina by providing opportunities for appropriate outdoor recreational use; providing the ability and facilities for viewing and enjoying the major scenic values of the area; protecting wildlife and natural communities within its boundaries; and providing interpretive and environmental programs that allow visitors to learn about the significant resources of the area. -
Chapter 2: Struggle for the Frontier Quiz
Chapter 2: Struggle for the Frontier Quiz 1. Which of the following tribes lived or hunted in Tennessee? (Select all that apply) a. Cherokee b. Shawnee c. Iroquois d. Creek e. Chickasaw 2. What is Cumberland Gap? a. A low area between the mountains that allowed travelers to cross the mountains more easily b. A trail cut by Richard Henderson through the mountains c. An early settlement in Tennessee d. A mountain peak between Tennessee and Kentucky 3. During the French and Indian War, the British built which Fort in an effort to keep the Cherokee loyal to their side? (Choose 1) a. Fort Nashborough b. Fort Donelson c. Fort Watauga d. Fort Loudoun 4. Choose one answer to complete this sentence: The Proclamation of 1763… a. Ended fighting between the British and the French. b. Prohibited settlements beyond the Appalachian Mountains in an effort to avoid further conflict with Native Americans. c. Was an agreement among the Cherokee about how to deal with the settlers. d. Ended the French and Indian War. Tennessee Blue Book: A History of Tennessee- Student Edition https://tnsoshistory.com 5. Why did the Watauga settlers create the Watauga Compact in 1772? a. Their settlement was under attack by the Cherokee b. Their settlement was outside the boundaries of any colony c. Their settlement was under the control of the British government d. Their settlement needed a more efficient system of government 6. Who cut the trail known as the Wilderness Road? a. James Robertson b. John Donelson c. Daniel Boone d. John Sevier 7. -
Cherokee County
Cherokee County - The Roads to Kings Mountain Two hundred forty years ago, during the first week of October, 1780, what is now Cherokee County was the site of im- portant events in the American Revolutionary War. During that week, both a British Loyalist Army and an American Patriot Army traveled across the county on their way to do battle at Kings Mountain. The American victory at the Bat- tle of Kings Mountain on October 7 is thought by many historians to be the turning point in the War. The British Army, under Major Patrick Ferguson, had been in North Carolina in the vicinity of Gilbert Town. He had sent a warning to the mountaineers living across the Blue Ridge. He had threatened that if they did not cease opposing the British forces, he would cross the mountains and destroy them with fire and sword. This threat had been like pour- ing gasoline on a fire. Instead of being intimidated, the mountaineers decided to gather an army and destroy Ferguson. Ferguson soon had gotten word that a sizable Patriot Army was coming after him. He decided to retreat south and join British General Cornwallis who was in Charlotte. He did not make it to Charlotte. He marched across Cherokee Coun- ty, camping several times. He crossed the Broad River at Tate’s Plantation and Ferry on October 5. After traveling about 15 miles from the Broad River, he stopped the Army and camped on top of Kings Mountain in what is today, York County. The “Overmountain Men” had been joined by militia from Virginia, South Carolina and Georgia. -
Link.Net Chancellor General Davis Lee Wright, Esq., P.O
SPRING 2018 Vol. 112, No. 4 n Proposed SAR Museum Gallery n 1768: The Year of the Farmer n DNA Found My Brother Congress 2018: Houston Bound SPRING 2018 Vol. 112, No. 4 6 16 6 2018 Congress to Convene 10 America’s Heritage and the 22 Newly Acquired Letters in Houston SAR Library Reveal More About the Maryland 400 7 Amendment Proposal/ 11 The Proposed SAR Museum Leadership Medical Committee Gallery 24 State Society & Chapter News 8 Nominating Committee Report/Butler Awarded 16 250th Series: 1768—The Year 38 In Our Memory/ Medal of Honor of the Farmer New Members 9 Newsletter Competitions 20 DNA Found My Brother 47 When You Are Traveling THE SAR MAGAZINE (ISSN 0161-0511) is published quarterly (February, May, August, November) and copyrighted by the National Society of the Sons of the American Revolution, 809 West Main Street, Louisville, KY 40202. Periodicals postage paid at Louisville, KY and additional mailing offices. Membership dues include The SAR Magazine. Subscription rate $10 for four consecutive issues. Single copies $3 with checks payable to “Treasurer General, NSSAR” mailed to the HQ in Louisville. Products and services advertised do not carry NSSAR endorsement. The National Society reserves the right to reject content of any copy. Send all news matter to Editor; send the following to NSSAR Headquarters: address changes, election of officers, new members, member deaths. Postmaster: Send address changes to The SAR Magazine, 809 West Main Street, Louisville, KY 40202. PUBLISHER: STAFF DIRECTORY President General Larry T. Guzy As indicated below, staff members have an email address and an extension number of the automated 4531 Paper Mill Road, SE telephone system to simplify reaching them. -
Tuscarora Trails: Indian Migrations, War, and Constructions of Colonial Frontiers
W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 2007 Tuscarora trails: Indian migrations, war, and constructions of colonial frontiers Stephen D. Feeley College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Indigenous Studies Commons, Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Feeley, Stephen D., "Tuscarora trails: Indian migrations, war, and constructions of colonial frontiers" (2007). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539623324. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-4nn0-c987 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Tuscarora Trails: Indian Migrations, War, and Constructions of Colonial Frontiers Volume I Stephen Delbert Feeley Norcross, Georgia B.A., Davidson College, 1996 M.A., The College of William and Mary, 2000 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the College of William and Mary in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Lyon Gardiner Tyler Department of History The College of William and Mary May, 2007 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. APPROVAL SHEET This dissertation is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Stephen Delbert F eele^ -^ Approved by the Committee, January 2007 MIL James Axtell, Chair Daniel K. Richter McNeil Center for Early American Studies 11 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. -
1 the Story of the Faulkner Murals by Lester S. Gorelic, Ph.D. the Story Of
The Story of the Faulkner Murals By Lester S. Gorelic, Ph.D. The story of the Faulkner murals in the Rotunda begins on October 23, 1933. On this date, the chief architect of the National Archives, John Russell Pope, recommended the approval of a two- year competing United States Government contract to hire a noted American muralist, Barry Faulkner, to paint a mural for the Exhibit Hall in the planned National Archives Building.1 The recommendation initiated a three-year project that produced two murals, now viewed and admired by more than a million people annually who make the pilgrimage to the National Archives in Washington, DC, to view two of the Charters of Freedom documents they commemorate: the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States of America. The two-year contract provided $36,000 in costs plus $6,000 for incidental expenses.* The contract ended one year before the projected date for completion of the Archives Building’s construction, providing Faulkner with an additional year to complete the project. The contract’s only guidance of an artistic nature specified that “The work shall be in character with and appropriate to the particular design of this building.” Pope served as the contract supervisor. Louis Simon, the supervising architect for the Treasury Department, was brought in as the government representative. All work on the murals needed approval by both architects. Also, The United States Commission of Fine Arts served in an advisory capacity to the project and provided input critical to the final composition. The contract team had expertise in art, architecture, painting, and sculpture. -
American Self-Government: the First & Second Continental Congress
American Self-Government: The First and Second Continental Congress “…the eyes of the virtuous all over the earth are turned with anxiety on us, as the only depositories of the sacred fire of liberty, and…our falling into anarchy would decide forever the destinies of mankind, and seal the political heresy that man is incapable of self-government.” ~ Thomas Jefferson Overview Students will explore the movement of the colonies towards self-government by examining the choices made by the Second Continental Congress, noting how American delegates were influenced by philosophers such as John Locke. Students will participate in an activity in which they assume the role of a Congressional member in the year 1775 and devise a plan for America after the onset of war. This lesson can optionally end with a Socratic Seminar or translation activity on the Declaration of Independence. Grades Middle & High School Materials • “American Self Government – First & Second Continental Congress Power Point,” available in Carolina K- 12’s Database of K-12 Resources (in PDF format): https://k12database.unc.edu/wp- content/uploads/sites/31/2021/01/AmericanSelfGovtContCongressPPT.pdf o To view this PDF as a projectable presentation, save the file, click “View” in the top menu bar of the file, and select “Full Screen Mode” o To request an editable PPT version of this presentation, send a request to [email protected] • The Bostonians Paying the Excise Man, image attached or available in power point • The Battle of Lexington, image attached or available in power -
Mecklenburg Resolves
The Mecklenburg Resolves Overview Students will examine the Mecklenburg Resolves and work in small groups to teach their classmates about the key ideas posed in the document. Students will then demonstrate their understanding of this document by creating innovative infomercials on the important elements of the Resolves. Students will also explore the limitations of the society that created the Mecklenburg Resolves, given that over 500,000 people were enslaved at the time. Grades 4-8 Materials • Image of the NC State Flag, attached • Excerpt from The Mecklenburg Resolves, attached • Dictionaries or Internet access Essential Questions: • What was the purpose of the Mecklenburg Resolves? • What effect did the Mecklenburg Resolves, the Halifax Resolves, and the Declaration of Independence have on colonists in regards to the Revolutionary War? • How could the authors of the Mecklenburg Resolves as well as the Declaration of Independence write these words and profess these ideals while supporting slavery? Duration 1-2 class periods Student Preparation Students should have a basic understanding of pre-Revolutionary tensions between the British and colonists, as well as the causes of the battles of Lexington and Concord. Procedure The North Carolina State Flag 1. As a warm-up, project an image of the North Carolina state flag (attached). Ask students to share what they know about the flag. Particularly, ask students if they can explain the significance of the two dates on the flag. (May 20, 1775 notes the date of the Mecklenburg Resolves and April 12, 1776 notes the date of the Halifax Resolves.) 2. Ask students to raise their hand if they have ever heard of the Mecklenburg Resolves. -
Catawba Militarism: Ethnohistorical and Archaeological Overviews
CATAWBA MILITARISM: ETHNOHISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL OVERVIEWS by Charles L. Heath Abstract While many Indian societies in the Carolinas disappeared into the multi-colored fabric of Southern history before the mid-1700s, the Catawba Nation emerged battered, but ethnically viable, from the chaos of their colonial experience. Later, the Nation’s people managed to circumvent Removal in the 1830s and many of their descendants live in the traditional Catawba homeland today. To achieve this distinction, colonial and antebellum period Catawba leaders actively affected the cultural survival of their people by projecting a bellicose attitude and strategically promoting Catawba warriors as highly desired military auxiliaries, or “ethnic soldiers,” of South Carolina’s imperial and state militias after 1670. This paper focuses on Catawba militarism as an adaptive strategy and further elaborates on the effects of this adaptation on Catawba society, particularly in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. While largely ethnohistorical in content, potential archaeological aspects of Catawba militarism are explored to suggest avenues for future research. American Indian societies in eastern North America responded to European imperialism in countless ways. Although some societies, such as the Powhatans and the Yamassees (Gleach 1997; Lee 1963), attempted to aggressively resist European hegemony by attacking their oppressors, resistance and adaptation took radically different forms in a colonial world oft referred to as a “tribal zone,” a “shatter zone,” or the “violent edge of empire” (Ethridge 2003; Ferguson and Whitehead 1999a, 1999b). Perhaps unique among their indigenous contemporaries in the Carolinas, the ethnically diverse peoples who came to form the “Catawba Nation” (see Davis and Riggs this volume) proactively sought to ensure their socio- political and cultural survival by strategically positioning themselves on the southern Anglo-American frontier as a militaristic society of “ethnic soldiers” (see Ferguson and Whitehead 1999a, 1999b). -
Tuscarora-War.Pdf
Cultures Clash CHERAW WEAPEMEOC SAPONI (P (POTESKEET) Albemarle County ASQUOT European Settlement Pushes (YEOPIM the Tuscarora Nation to the Roanoke ANK) SHAKORI CHOWANOC ) Breaking Point River ENO R. Edenton Yadkin UPPER 1710 Albemarle Sound KEYAUWEE SISSIPAHAW TUSCARORA F r e n c MORATOK (ROANOAK) h Catawba B SECOTAN r o Bath County a d (MACHAPUNGO) R Torhunta CATAWBA Cape Ft. Neoheroka Bath i V v V V V Ft. Hancock e 1690 r R. Fear CHEROKEE Catechna Pamlico R. R. d (HATTERAS) TUSCARORA POMOUIK un SUGEREE Ft. So Barnwell Barnwell New Bern lico (Narhantes) am WAXHAW and 1710 P Cape T Moore rent R. R. Hatteras Expeditions Neuse WATEREE NEUSIOK (COREE) Beaufort 1715 THE TUSCARORA WAR — Main Events Cape Lookout 1710 WACCAMAW Colonial town of New Bern displaces Tuscarora village of Chattoka Clarendon County PRINCIPAL INDIAN TRIBES Wilmington From The Way We Lived in North Carolina 1711 Ca. 1600-1700, in addition to 1733 © 2003 The University of North Carolina Press Mid-September — John Lawson is executed near the village of Catechna Tuscarora. (Eastern tribes largely CAPE FEAR Map © North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources September 22 — Tuscarora Indians, in alliance with members of displaced displaced by white settlers.) All rights reserved. coastal tribes, attack colonists along the Neuse, Pamlico, and Trent Rivers Cape Fear October 27 —South Carolina resolves to raise troops to fight the Tuscaroras Forts Brunswick Town 1725 Indian Woods 1712 Reservation established in 1717 January 28 — The Barnwell Expedition crosses the Cape Fear River for Tuscarora remaining in North Carolina following the war of January 30 — Barnwell’s force destroys the Tuscarora village of Narhantes 1711-1713. -
The Yamasee War: 1715 - 1717
University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Archaeology and Anthropology, South Carolina Archaeology Month Posters Institute of 10-2015 The aY masee War: 1715 - 1717 South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology--University of South Carolina Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/archmonth_poster Part of the Anthropology Commons Publication Info Published in 2015. South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology--University of South Carolina. Archaeology Month Poster - The aY masee War: 1715 - 1717, 2015. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina, South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology, 2015. http://artsandsciences.sc.edu/sciaa/ © 2015 by University of South Carolina, South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology This Poster is brought to you by the Archaeology and Anthropology, South Carolina Institute of at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Archaeology Month Posters by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE YAMASEE WAR: 1715 - 1717 Thomas Nairne, “A map of South Carolina shewing the settlements of the English, French, & Indian nations from Charles Town to the River Missisipi [sic].” 1711. From Edward Crisp, “A compleat description of the province of Carolina in 3 parts.” Photo courtesy of Library of Congress 24th Annual South Carolina Archaeology Month October 2015 USC • South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology • 1321 Pendleton Street • Columbia S -
Did You Know? North Carolina
Did You Know? North Carolina Discover the history, geography, and government of North Carolina. The Land and Its People The state is divided into three distinct topographical regions: the Coastal Plain, the Piedmont Plateau, and the Appalachian Mountains. The Coastal Plain affords opportunities for farming, fishing, recreation, and manufacturing. The leading crops of this area are bright-leaf tobacco, peanuts, soybeans, and sweet potatoes. Large forested areas, mostly pine, support pulp manufacturing and other forest-related industries. Commercial and sport fishing are done extensively on the coast, and thousands of tourists visit the state’s many beaches. The mainland coast is protected by a slender chain of islands known as the Outer Banks. The Appalachian Mountains—including Mount Mitchell, the highest peak in eastern America (6,684 feet)—add to the variety that is apparent in the state’s topography. More than 200 mountains rise 5,000 feet or more. In this area, widely acclaimed for its beauty, tourism is an outstanding business. The valleys and some of the hillsides serve as small farms and apple orchards; and here and there are business enterprises, ranging from small craft shops to large paper and textile manufacturing plants. The Piedmont Plateau, though dotted with many small rolling farms, is primarily a manufacturing area in which the chief industries are furniture, tobacco, and textiles. Here are located North Carolina’s five largest cities. In the southeastern section of the Piedmont—known as the Sandhills, where peaches grow in abundance—is a winter resort area known also for its nationally famous golf courses and stables.