DCN 608

Activity UIC: NO0245

MILITARY VALUE ANALYSIS

DATA CALL WORK SHEET

FOR NAVY BASE:NAVAL STATION, , CA.

BASE PRIMARY UIC: NO0245 (lnsert this UIC in "Header A' on every page)

Category ...... Operational Support Su b-category...... Naval Bases

* * * * * * * *If any responses are classified, attach separate classified annex.* * * * * * * * * * Activity UIC: NO0245

Naval Station Listing

TYpe Title Location BASE I NAVSUBASE NEW LONDON I GROTON CT I I NAVAL STATION NAVAL STATION ANNAPOLIS ANNAPOLIS MD

AMPHIBIOUS BASE NAVPHIBASE LITTLE CREEK NORFOLK VA NAVAL STATION 1 NAVAL STATION NORFOLK I NORFOLK VA 11 SUBMARINE BASE NAVSUBASE KINGS BAY KINGS BAY GA NAVAL STATION NAVAL STATION MAYPORT MAYPORT FL NAVAL STATION I NAVAL STATION PASCACOULA I PASCAGOULA MS 11 NAVAL STATION I NAVAL STATION INGLEslDE I ~NGLES~~ETx II NAVAL STATION / NAVAL STATION ROOSEVELT ROADS ROOSEVELT I ROADS PR SUBMARINE BASE SUBMARINE BASE BANCOR SILVERDALE WA I NAVAL STATION I NAVAL STATION EVERETT I EVERETT WA 11 NAVAL STATION I NAVAL STATION SAN DIEGO I SAN DIECO CA 11 I NAVPHIBASE CORONADO CA SAN DIEGO CA NAVAL AIR STATION 1 NAVAL AIR STATlON NORTH ISLAND I SAN DIEGO CA 11 NAVAL STATION I NAVAL STATION 1 PEARL HARBOR ~lll SUBMARINE BASE I SUBMARINE BASE SAN DIEGO I SAN DIEGOCA 11 SUBMARINE BASE SUBMARINE BASE PEARL HARBOR PEARL HARBOR HI NAVAL STATION I NAVAL STATION GUAM I GUAM Activity UIC: NO0245

Data for Military Value Analysis

Table of Contents

Base infrastructure and investment ...... 2 Historic investment ...... 2 Planned investment ...... 2 Maintenance dredging load ...... 3 Vehicle maintenance facilities ...... 4 Waterfront capacity ...... 4 Encroachment issues ...... 5

Logistics Support ...... 6 Non-DOD support missions ...... 6 Inter-service Support Agreements ...... 6 Logistic facilities ...... 6 Air facilities ...... 6 Ports of embarkation ...... 7

Maintenance Support ...... 8 Aviation maintenance support ...... 8 Collimation. deperming. and degaussing ...... 8 Small craft and Mine Warfare maintenance support ...... 9 ...... 10 Maintenance support activities ...... 10

Personnel support ...... 11 Administrative spaces ...... 11

Operational Suitability ...... 12 Distance to sea and training areas ...... 12 Mobilization potential ...... 13 Operational support missions ...... 14 Weather and climate ...... 15

Ordnancesupport ...... 17

Training support ...... 18

Quality of Life ...... 19 Activity UIC: NO0245

Base Infrastructure and Investment

1. List the project number, description, funding year, and value of the capital improvements at your base completed (beneficial occupancy) during 1988 through 1994. Indicate if the capital improvement is a result of BRAC realignments or closures.

Table 1.1 Capital Improvement Expenditure

Project Description Fund Value Year

P-004 DEPERMING PIER MSF FY84 7,573,000

P-253 BEQ (TWELVE STORY) FY87 15,267,900

P-25 1 AUTO HOBBY SHOP ADDITION FY88 314,000

P-28 1 ELECTRICAL UPGRADE PIER 8 FY88 1,250,000

P-122 COMMISARYSTORE FY88 6,595,605

P-013 WEAPONS TRAINING FACILIIY FY87 3,703,000

P-282 YOUTH CENTER, M.C. FY88 2,225,000

P-209 NEW BERTHING/ REPAIR PIER 13 FY88 30,093,197

P-329 GYMNASIUM FACILITY FY89 232,422

P-181 EXPANSION OF B. 3141 (CMIO) FY89 1,540,489

P-012 MAINTENANCE FACILTY (SIMA) FY84 7,891,500

P-123 EXPANSION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE (PWC) FY90 1,06,269

P-253 BEQ PARKING LOT ADDITION FY87 278,221

P-109 CHILD CARE CENTER, M.C. FY90 923,522

P-330 COMMISARY DIST. CENTER FY91 1,888,436

P-3 13 MAXI-MART/ GAS STATION FY90 1,586,487

P-149 STEAM LINE (PWC) FY91 1,347,983

P-288 AIR CONDITIONING FOR GALLEY FY92 200,000

P-343 BUILDING 58 CONVERSION (UMC) FY93 1,333,103 - Activity UIC: NO0245

P-262 PIER 7 UPGRADE (BRAC) FY91 5,140,922

P-002 FIRE FIGHTING SCHOOL (FTC) FY90 12,413,135

P-120 ELECTRICAL DIST. SYSTEM FY92 7,600,000

P-340 COMMISSARY EXPANSION (DECA) FY92 6,800,000

P-065 WAREHOUSE ADDITION (FISC) 6,987,611 ------FY92-~ P-317 BAYVIEW HILLS MINI-MART FY93 688,000

P-332s PIER 2 DREDGING (BRAC) FY94 1,137,650

P-193 NAVY LODGE (NAVRESSO) FY92 3,524,000 P-3 16 NAVY EXCHANGE ADDITION (NAVRESSO) FY93 3,933,000

2.a. List the project number, description, funding year, and value of the non-BRAC related capital improvements planned for years 1995 through 1997.

Table 2.1 Planned Capital improvements

Project Description Fund Value Year I

I P-344 I EODMU-3 WAREHOUSE & COLD STORAGE I FY95 1 720,000

P-111 I CHAPEU RELIGIOUS FACILITY 1 FY95 1 4,100,000 P-186 OlLY WASTE COLLECTION & SEPARATION FACILITY - - / P-244 OlLY WASTE COLLECTION FY97 25,130,000 P-350 I OILY WASTE TREATMENT FACILITY (UMO I FY94 1 500,000 I I I P-169 I CBU FACILITY (PWC) I FY94 1 1,156,000 P-232 1 EPMU-5 EXPANSION (EPMU-5) I FY96 1 1,730,000 Activity UIC: NO0245

2.b. List the project number, description, funding year, and value of the BRAC related capital improvements planned for 1995 through 1999. Table 2.2 Planned BRAC Ca~italim~rovements I Project Description Fund Value Year

P-338s PIER 3 DREDGING FY94 7,432,000 P-323R PIER 3 UPGRADE FY90 2,400,000 P-023T CONSTRUCT TRAINING BUILDING (FTC) FY96 8,400,000

P-205T MEDICAL CLINIC EXPANSION (NAVMEDCEN) FY96 9,000,000 3. Us~ng1988 through 1993 as a basis, list the annual average cubic yards of dredge

spoils created from maintenance dredging- - of both pierlwharf areas and navy maintained channels. Provide the average cost to dredge and dispose of these spoils over the given years. If all required maintenance dredging has not been accomplished, estimate the cubic yards that should have been removed, the cost to remove them, and the reason that the required maintenance dredging was not accomplished. If dredging is infrequently required, indicate in remarks the requested data and the year the dredging was last accomplished.

Table 3.1 Maintenance Dredging Year / PieriWharf Areas Navy Maintained Deferred Dredging

I Channels Cu Yds Cost Cu Yds Cost Reason Cu Yds Cost 1 1988 I NONE 1 NONE 1 NONE I NONE I NONE I NONE I NONE 1989 NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE

1990 NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE 1991 NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE

1992 NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE 19931 NONE I NONE ( NONE I NONE ( NONE I NONE I NONE I I I I I I I 1994 1 NONE I NONE 1 166,169 1 996,763 1 NONE I NONE I NONE

Remarks: Maintenance dredging at Naval Station, San Diego is usually only required at the two creek channels and their outfall at an average of every 3 to 10 years depending on the amount of rainfall during the winter seasons. The main channel and the areas Activity UIC: NO0245

around the pier slips will ocasionally get a high spot from migration of the bay bottom caused from ship properller wash and sloughing of the side slops. The majority of our dredging projects are for new depths due to the increase in home porting deep draft ships at the Naval Station.

4. Vehicle Maintenance Facilities

4.a. List the DOD vehicle and equipment maintenance facilities at your installation and their capabilities. Table 4.1 Vehicle Maintenance Facilities

Facility Name CCN Capabilities PWC TRANSPORATAION 2 14-20 AUTOMOTIVE MAINTENANCE, MATERIAL, OPERATIONS1 TOOLROOM AND ADMlN ISTRATIVE MAINTENACE SUPPORT AND DISPATCH SERVICES

PWC TRANSPORTATION 214-20 AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR, TIRE REPAIR, AND MAINTENANCE DYNOMOMETER

PWC TRANSPORTATION 214-20 HEAVY EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND HEAVY EQUIPMENT REPAIR MAINTENANCE

NEX AUTO SERVICE 740-30 SERVICE AUTOMOBILES AND LIGHT CENTER 32ND STREET TRUCKS - ENGINE TUNE UP, IGNITION & FUEL SYSTEM, BRAKE SERVICE, WHEEL ALIGNMENT & SUSPENSION SERVICE, LUBRICATION & COOLING SYSTEM, BATTERY & ELECTRICAL, AC, WHEELS & TIRES, SMOG CERTIFICATION, PENDING TOW & ROAD SERVICE, CLUTCH SERVICE, MISC. MINOR REPAIRS.

4.b. List the civilian (non-DOD) vehicle maintenance facilities that units based at the installation use on a regular basis. Table 4.2 Commercial Vehicle Maintenance

Facility Name K$lyr Capabilities Locat ion

QUlKl LUBE 780,000 LUBE, OIL & FILTER SERVICE, NEX 110-120, COOLING SYSTEM SERVICE, NAVSTA SD, AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION SERVICE MAIN COMPLEX Activity UIC: NO0245

5. Describe the types of improvements to the waterfront at the base. If waterfront improvements are non-continuous list the length and description of the improvements for each segment.

Electrical upgrade of pier 3 in N95. No other major improvements are currently programmed. Numerous maintenance and repair projects to the piers, such as fender system replacement and utility system replacement, totalling approximatly $5,000,000.00 per year are done continually.

6. Encroachment Issues:

6.a. What are the ground, training noise, beacrh gradient, waterway, harbor, explosive quantity distance standard, HERO, HERF, tiERP, AICUZ, and airspace encroachments of record at each station, base, or facility?

ESDQ ARCS PER NAVFAC DRAWING # 6086805 REV AUGUST 1992. Hard copy will be attached as an enclosure to the forwarding letter.

A HERO SURVEY HAS NEVER BEEN CONDUCTED AT NAVAL STATION, SAN DIEGO.

6.b. Do current estimates of population growth and development or environmental constraints pose problems for the station, base, or facility? Why or why not?

YES, environmental contraints composed of dredging (most slips are now considered to contain contaminants which are unsuitable for ocean disposal), and Installation Restoration sites which are restricted from construction of permanent facilities until such time that they are cleaned up are the main issues. Air Pollution regulations and permit requirements may also add additional constraints.

6.c. Provide a description of local zoning ordinances which might impact on future encroachment.

NONE

Logistics Support

7. Do you or any of your tenants have special non-DOD or civilian support missions? Describe the missions and state which tenant activity performs the mission. If realignments planned between today and Pr' 1997 will add non-DOD or civilian support missions describe them. Activity UIC: NO0245

8. List all inter-service support agreements (ISSAs) that involve supporting military (non-DON) and civilian activities at the base. Table 8.1 Non-DON Su~~ortAgreements

Agency/ Tenant / Tenant Description of Support Role Degree Service name , UIC/ of DODAAC support

N on NAVY NONE Provide police protection, security, 10O0/~* profit RELIEF disaster control, work space, utilities, organ iza- cyclical maintenance, grounds tion maintenace, safety, trash removal, roads, parking and pest control. N on RED CROSS NONE Provide pol ice protection, security 100°/~ * profit disaster control, works space, utilities, organ iza- cyclical maintenance, grounds tion maintenance, safety, trash removal, road!;, parking and pest control.

ARMY CA. ARMY W81 LAB Provide police protection, security, 100°/0 * NATIONAL disaster control, work space, cyclical GUARD maintenance, grounds maintenance, safety, trash removal, roads, parking and pest control. Note: 100°/0 denotes tie fact that of the services we provide, we provide 100°/~of those services.

9. List the logistic support facilities (FISC or FISC detachment, Defense Distribution Depot, fuel terminal, weapon station, etc.) located on your base. a. FLEET & INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CENTER b. DEFENSE DISTRIBUTION DEPOT CENTER c. NAVY PUBLIC WORKS CENTER

10. List the logistic support facilities (FISC or FlSC detachment, Defense Distribution Depot, fuel terminal, weapon station, etc.) located off your base but in the harbor complex. a. FLEET & INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CENTER b. DEFENSE DISTRIBUTION DEPOT CENTER c. NAVY PUBLIC WORKS CENTER d. PIER BRAVO @ NASNl e. FUEL TERMINAL @ PT LOMA Activity UIC: NO0245

11. Describe any DOD (including DON) air facilities located in the harbor complex. a. NAVAL AIR STATION NORTH ISLAND b. NAVAL MEDICAL CENTER, SAN DIEGO c. NAVAL AIR LANDING FACILITY, SAN CLEMENTE ISLAND d. NAVAL AIR STATION MlRAMAR e. COAST GUARD AIR STATION, HARBOR DRIVE (HELO PAD) f. NAVAL AMPHIBIOUS BASE, CORONADO has a single 100' x 100' lighted heipad located on the bay end of the base. g. NAVAL OUTLYING FIELD, IMPERIAL BEACH

12. State the location of and distance to the nearest Air Port of Embarkation (APOE)

APOE: , CA. DISTANCE: 508 MILES

13. State the location of and distance to the nearest Sea Port of Embarkation (SPOE)

SPOE: LONG BEACH, CA DISTANCE: 110 MILES

14. State the location of and distance to the nearest Cargo Rail Terminal.

SANTA FE RAIL ROAD FRIEGHT TERMINAL HARBOR DR & 10TH AVENUE, SAN DIEGO 3 MILES

Maintenance Support

15.a. List the fleet helicopter maintenance facilities in the harbor complex.

HSWING: HS-2, 4, 5, 8, 10, 14, AND 85 HSLWING: HSL-37, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, AND 84 HCWING: HC-1, 3, AND 1 1

AlMD NORTH ISLAND PROVIDES INTERMEDIATE LEVEL AND NADEP NORTH ISLAND PROVIDES DEPOT LEVEL MAINTENANCE FACILITIES TO SUPPORT HELICOPTERS AT NAS NORTH ISLAND. Activity UIC: NO0245

15.b. List the maintenance facilities in the harbor complex that have capability to repair aviation support equipment (ground support equipment, arresting gear, RAST systems, catapults, etc.). If only some of the capabilities are supported describe the capabilities and limitations of each facility.

AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT: AIMD NORTH ISLAND PERFORMS PRE- OPERATION, POST-OPERATION, DAILY INSPECTION, SERVICING AND DAILY MAINTENANCE PER MRC'S; TEST AND CHECK, FAULT ISOLATE, ADJUST, AND REPAIR AND REMOVE COMPONENTS PER MIMS, HMIS, OVERHAUL INSTRUCTIONS AND SOURCE MAINTENANCE AND RECOVERABILITY (SM&R) CODES; , PRESERVATION AND CORROSION CONTROL AS REQUIRED; MINOR REPAIR TO HOUSINGS, FRAMES, BODIES, FENDERS AND ENCLOSURES, INCLUDING WELDING AND REPAIRING; REPAIR OF INSTALLED SEGTES; REPAIR AND TEST OF AUTOMOTIVE COMPONENTS, INCLUDING TRANSMISSIONS, AXLES, DIFFERENTIALS, SUSPENSION SYSTEMS, BRAKE DRUMS AND ROTORS, AND REPLACEMENT OR REPAIR OF DIESEL AND INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE COMPONENTS AS WELL AS WHEEL ALIGNMENT PER MIM'S HMI'S, OVERHAUL INSTRUCTION AND SM&R CODES; FUNTIONAL TEST OF ENGINE AND ACCESSORIES ON A RUN UP STAND; HYDRAULIC SYSTEM CONTAMINATION CONTROL; COMPLIANCE WITH TECHNICAL DIRECTIVES; HOISTING SLINGS AND RETRAINING DEVICES CLASSIFIED AS SE; AND ENVIRONMENT COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL DIRECTION, PROVIDE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT POOL.

ARRESTING GEAR: NADEP NORTH ISLAND. RAST GEAR: SlMA SAN DIEGO.

16.a. List all collimation towers in the harbor complex.

PIER 7 NAVAL STATION

16.b. List all degaussing and deperming facilities located in the harbor complex.

MAGNETIC SILENCING FACILITY - DEGAUSSING, DEPERMING & MAGNETIC ROLLGARDEN. LOCATED AT PT LOMA, SAN DIEGO Activity UIC: NO0245

17.a. List the DON landing craft, small craft, , and pontoon maintenance facilities in your harbor complex and their capabilities.

Table 17.1 Small Craft Maintenance Facilities

Facility Name CCN Capabil itit?s

PHIBCB ONE 21 3-58 SHIPFITTING, SHOP, RIGGING, SAIL LOFT, BOAT SHOP, AND SMALL SPRAY BOOTH. USED FOR BLDG 332 CAUSEWAY KEHAB.

BOAT SHOP,BLDG 21 3-58 LANDING CRAFT, AND SMALL BOAT REPAIRS. 326 WOOD SHOP, METAL SHOP, DIESEL ENGINE OVERHAIJL. DYNO FACILITY 2 13-58 TEST DIESEL ENGINES BLDG 346

FIBERGLASS SHOP 21 3-59 FIBERGLASS AND WOOD REPAIRS, SMALL CRAFT BLDG 347 PAINTING

ABRASIVE BLAST 213-59 INDOOR BLAST FAC. FOR BLASTING CAUSEWAY FACl LlTY BLDG SECTIONS, AND OTHER LARGE RELATED 350 COMPONENTS.

1 7.b. Li.st the Mine Warfare equipment maintenance facilities located in your harbor complex and their capabilities. Table 17.2 Mine Warfare Maintenance Facilities

Facility Name CCN Capabilities

NONE NONE NONE

17.c. What plant modifications/facility improvements are programmed in the Presidential 1995 Budget through 1997 and all BRACON that would add to the maintenance facilities in your harbor complex? Provide a description, cost, and additional capacity that could be realized.

NONE Activity UIC: NO0245

17.d List the commercial landing craft, boat, barge, and small craft maintenance facilities that units based at the installation use on a regular basis.

Table 17.3 Commercial Small Craft Maintenance Facilities

Facility Name K$/y r Capabilities Location NONE NONE NONE NONE

17.e. List the commercial maintenance facilities that units based at the installation use for Mine Warfare equipment maintenance on a regular basis.

Table 1 7.4 Commercial Mine Warfare Maintenance Facilities

Facility Name K$/yr Capabilities Location NONE NONE NONE NONE

18. List the shipyards in the harbor complex. Describe if they are.government or commercial, and briefly describe their unique capabilities (including nuclear repair facilities).

GOVERNMENT

a. DD-1 RAVING: CAPACITY OF 33,000 TN, CAN DOCK LPH CLASS SHIPS. b. AFDM FLOATING: CAPACITY OF 9,700 T'N, CAN DOCK CRUISER CLASS SHIPS.

COMMERCIAL a. A&E INDUSTRIES, NATIONAL CITY, CA. NO UNIQUE CAPABILITIES, HAS NO PIERS OR DRYDCICKS. b. BAY CITY MARINE, NATIONAL CITY, CA. NO UNIQUE CAPABILITIES, FACILITY IS LANDLOCKED, NO PIERS OR DRYDOCKS. c. CAMPBELL INDUSTRIES, SAN DIEGO, CA. NO UNIQUE CAPABILITIES, 2400 LT DRYDOCK. d. CONTINENTAL MARITIME, SAN DIEGO, CA. NO UNIQUE CAPABILITIES, NO DRY DOCK. e. FRAISER BOILER SERVICE, SAN DIEGO, CA. NO UNIQUE CAPABILITIES, LANDLOCKED, NO PIERS OR DRYDOCK FACILITIES. f. NATIONAL STEEL & COMPANY, SAN DIEGO ,CA. NAVSEA CERTIFIED 20,750 LONGTON FLOATING DRYDOCK, 1000 X 175 BUILDING BASIN AND PIERS, CAPABILITIES FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION. g. PACIFIC SHIP REPAIR & FABRICATION, SAN DIEGO, CA. NO UNIQUE CAPABILITIES, FACILITY IS LANDLOCKED, NO PIERS OR DRYDOCKS . Activity UIC: NO0245 h. SOUTHWEST MARINE INC., SAN DIEGO, CA. NAVSEA CERTIFIED 17,500 LONGTON FLOATING DRYDOCK AND 900 X 700 LONGTON MARINE RAILWAY, HAS AN UNCERTIFIED 4,000 LONGTON FLOATING DRYDOCK.

19. Describe what ship classes are currently under new construction in shipyard in the harbor complex. a. AOE-6 & T-AKR 310 NEW CONSTRLJCTION AT NATIONAL STEEL & SHIPBUILDING COMPANY. b. T-AKR 295, T-AKR 297, AND T-AKR 299 CONVERSION AT NATIONAL STEEL & SHIPBUILDING COMPANY.

20. If there is no shipyard in the harbor complex, provide the distance (water travel) to the nearest shipyard.

NOT APPLICABLE AS NO COMMERCIAL SHIPYARDS ARE LOCATED IN THE HARBOR COMPLEX. NEAREST NAVAL SHIPYARD IS NAVAL SHIPYARD LONG BEACH, .

21. List the maintenance support activities (MOTU, etc.) at the base. a. MOBILE TECHNICAL UNlT 5 b. AFDM 14 c. CONSOLIDATED DIVERS UNlT d. NAVY PUBLIC WORKS CENTER e. SHORE INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE ACTlVlY f. SUPERVISOR OF SHIPBUILDING, CONVERSION & REPAIR

Personnel Support Facilities

22. Administrative Spaces Activity UIC: NO0245

22.a. In the following table, indicate the available space (SF), individual workstation (PN), and condition for each facility designated or used for administrative purposes. Activity UIC: NO0245

Adminrstratrve 610-10 224 0 0 1,530 10 0 0 1,530 10 offlce

Admrn~stratrve 610-10 261 0 0 6,480 43 0 0 6,480 43 offrce

Adm~nistrative 610-10 262 0 0 10,512 70 0 0 10,512 70 office

Adm~nistratlve 6 10-10 263 12,960 86 0 0 0 0 12,960 86 office

Administrative 610-10 265 0 0 12,960 86 0 0 12,960 86 office

Admin~strative 61 0-10 268 6,480 43 0 0 0 0 6,480 43 office

Administrative 610-10 2 70 0 0 1,416 9 0 0 1,416 9 office

Administrative 610-10 271 0 0 12,960 86 0 0 12,960 86 office

Administrative 61 0-10 273 0 0 2,541 17 0 0 2,541 17 office

Administrative 61 0-10 279 0 0 12,700 85 0 0 12,700 85 office

Administrative 610-10 287 0 480 300 480 3 ---office Administrative 61 0-10 2 94 0 0 700 500 700 5 office

Administrative 610-10 453 600 4 0 000 600 4 office

Adminrstrative 610-10 467 386 3 0 000 386 3 office

Administrative 61 0-10 3116 18,824 126 0 0 0 0 18,824 126 office

Administrat~ve 61 0-10 3135 1,125 8 0 0 0 0 1,125 8 office

Admin~strative 610-10 3152 0 0 1,824 12 0 0 1,824 12 off~ce

Admlnlstrative 61 0-10 321 1 1,960 13 0 0 0 0 1,960 13 offtce - Activity UIC: NO0245

1 Adm~nistrative 61 0-10 323 1 912 6 0 000 91 2 6 office

Administrative 61 0-10 3300 3,965 26 0 0 0 0 3,965 26 offtce

Admin~strattve 610-10 3368 1,600 11 0 0 0 0 1,600 11 offtce

Admin~strat~ve 610-10 3416 4,000 27 0 0 0 0 4,000 27 off~ce

Administratrve 610-10 3436 4,000 27 0 0 0 0 4,000 27 offtce

~nstallat~on

Legal services 6 10-40 1 0 0 13,720 92 0 0 13,720 92

Legal services 610-40 99 0 0 9,735 65 0 0 9,735 65

Totals 6 10-40 0 0 23,455 157 0 0 23,455 157

Admin storage 610-77 74 0 0 1,000 0 0 0 1,000 0

Underground 620-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Admm office

Underground 620-20 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 ADP ~nstallation

Underground 620-77 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 admln storage

22.b. For all facilities that were classified as inadequate in the preceding table, identify the type of facility and describe why the facility is inadequate; indicate how the facility is being used and list other possible uses; and specify the costs to remove the deficiencies that make it inadequate (do not be concerned with the economic justification for these costs). Indicate current plans to remove these deficiencies and the amount of any programmed funds.

NONE Activity UIC: NO0245

23. Describe any administrative support facility limitations. Describe the potential for expansion of the services that personnel support facilities provide.

NO LIMITATIONS IF YOU BUILD UP (MULTY STORY) ON EXISTING SITES. Expansion limited due to available space in existing buildings and land constrained by contaminated sites. Activity UIC: NO0245

38.c. Describe any unique training opporturlities afforded by the local climate or geography. / ' EXTREMELY MILD CLIMATE, AND APPROXIMATELY 9" RAIN PER YE 'R AFFORDS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR YEAR ROUND TRAINING. WEATHER D YS ARE VIRTUALLY NON-EXISTENT. P ,' /,' Ordnance Support

39.a. List the ordnance terminals at your station. If the base has no ordnance terminal, list the distance (ship transit miles) to the nearest ordnance station. ,' NO TERMINALS AT NAVSTA. CLOSEST IS BRAVO AT NAS NORTH ISLAND (5 MILES). NEAREST WEAPONS STATION IS SEAL

39.b. List any ordnance anchorages in your complex. Provide the limits on their use.

NO ANCHORAGES, HOWEVER ALL PIERS PIER 14 AT NAVSTA ARE CERTIFIED CNO 3000 # NEW MAX, 1.3 OR 1.4 PER PIER 1500 # NEW MAX, 1.1 OR 1.2 PER

40. State the location, the explosive ordnance disposal (EOD) unit tasked to

EODMU 7 - NAVAL G 78, located within station boundary, 5 minutes. EODMU 3 - NAVAL 78, located within station boundary, 5 minutes. EODMU 3 - MSF, boundary, 5 minutes. 41. Can you or a tenant actif ~tyreload VLS ship magazines? YES Training Support I 42. List the fleet training commands located in the harbor complex that offer fleet refresher

FLETRAGEN, SAN DIEGO Activity UIC: NO0245

43. List the combat system, combat control, or ship control team training simulators and their capabilities, if any, owned by training commands in the harbor complex .

COMBAT SYSTEM, COMBAT CONTROL, SHlP CONTROL TEAM TRAINING SIMULATORS.

a. FLETRAGEN, SAN DlEGO HAS A 12DS HARPOON OPERATORlTEAM TRAINING SYSTEM, 20H5A DD-963 ENGINEERING CONTROUSURVEILLANCE SYSTEM OPERATOR TRAINER, AND 20H6B ENGlNEERlNG CONTROL SYSTEM OPERATOR TRAINER.

b. SUBMARINE PILOTING AND NAVIGATION TRAINER 15F12 (ONE)

CAPABILITY. CAPABLE OF TRAINING BOTH SUBMARINE AND SURFACE SHIP PILOTING AND NAVIGATION TEAMS. CAPABLE OF DEPICTING SEVEN SPECIFIC PORTS, PRODUCING SIMULATED RADAR ECHOES FROM LAND AND SURFACE TARGETS. PERISCOPE VISUAL SCENES ARE ALSO POSSIBLE.

C. ANIBSY-1 (V) -T2 TEAM TRAINER

CAPABILITY. SIMULATES THE ATTACK CENTER OF SSN 751-773 CLASS OF FAST ATTACK . d. CCS MK-1 SUBMARINE COMBAT SYSTEMS TEAM TRAINER TD 2 1A43 (TWO)

CAPABILITY. SIMULATES THE ATTACK CENTER OF SSN 637 AND 688 CLASSES OF FAST ATTACK SUBMARINES.

44. Indicate if the base or an activity in the harbor complex has a shipboard and/or aviation fire fighting trainer. lndicate if the base or an activity in the harbor complex has a shipboard damage control wet trainer. Provide details on the ship classes these trainers are designed to support. a. FLETRAGEN, SAN DlEGO HAS BOTH SHIPBOARD AND AVIATION FlRE FIGHTING TRAINERS. FLETRAGEN, SAN CIIEGO HAS A SHIPBOARD DAMAGE CONTROL WET TRAINER. THESE TRAINERS CAN SUPPORT ALL CLASSES OF SURFACE SHIPS.

b. SUBMARINE FIRE FIGHTING TRAINER

CAPABILITY. SIMULATES A GENERIC ENGlNEERlNG SPACE ABOARD A SUBMARINE. TRAINS SUBMARINE AND SURFACE SHlP CREW MEMBERS AND RESERVISTS IN FlRE FIGHTING PROCEDURES. ALL CLASSES OF SUBMARINES. Activity UIC: NO0245 c. SUBMARINE DAMAGE CONTROL TRAINER

CAPABILITY. SIMULATES THE PORT SIDE OF A TYPICAL ENGINE ROOM OF A FAST ATTACK SUBMARINE. TRAINS SUBMARINE AND SURFACE SHIP CREW MEMBERS AND RESERVISTS IN DAMAGE CONTROL PROCEDURES. ALL CLASSES OF SUBMARINES.

45. List the training commands on the base that provide Class A or Class C schools. a. FLETRAGEN, SAN DIEGO PROVIDES CLASS C SCHOOLS. b. SUBMARINE TRAINING FACILITY, SAN DIEGO, CA. (UIC 31 954) c. NAVSEACENPAC d. SERVICE SCHOOL COMMAND

46. List any unique training facilities not captured earlier in this data call. a. VERTICAL LAUNCH SYSTEM (VLS) TRAINING. b. NAVY RESCUE SWIMMER SCHOOL. c. SHIPBOARD SECURITY ENGAGEMENT WEAPONS AND TACTICS COURSE. d. DOCKSIDE AND SIMULATOR TRAINER. Following data provided to ensure a complete listing of all - activities requested by questions 42 and 43. Change N4644- 42. List the fleet operational training commands located in CPF the harbor complex that offer fleet refresher training JUL 94 schools. -

Naval Amphibious School, NAB Coronado (NAVPHISCOL) Fleet Anti -Submarine Warfare Training Center, pacific (FLEASWTRACENPAC) Fleet Training command (FTC) Fleet Combat Training Center, pacific (FCTCPAC) Tactical Training Group, Pacific (TACTRAGRUPAC) Submarine Training Facili ty, San Diego (SUBTRAFAC) Fleet Intelligence Training Cent:er (FITCPAC) Afloat Training Group Pacific (ATGPAC) Weapons Training Group Pacific (WEPTRAGRUPAC) SWATSCOPAC - Located on North Island FASOTRAGRUPAC - Located on North Island

All course information for the following schools submitted in Data Call 22: PHIBSCOL FLEASWTRACENPAC FTC FCTCPAC TACTRAGRU FITCPAC

43. List the combat system, combat control or ship control team training simulators and their capabilities, if any, owned by training command in the harbor complex.

FCTCPAC 7B4 Outboard Team Trainer 12SBA Harpoon Team Trainer 20F15A/1 FFG- 7 Combat Sys . Team Trainer 20F15A/5 MK- 86 Gunfire Control ,Sys tern

FLEASWTRACENPAC 14A2E Surface Ship ASW Attack Trainer 14A6A ASW Coordinated Tactics Trainer 14A12 Surface ASW Team Trainer 14E19 SQS-26CX Basic and Team Trainer 14332 Lamps Roof top Trainer

FLETRACEN SAN DIEGO 1208 Harpoon Team Trainer 20A62 Ship Hand1 ing Emergency Trainer 20H4 Dockside Underway Rep1 enishment Simulator ATG PAC 20B4 Mobile Combat Systems Team Trainer 20B5 FFG-7 Pierside Combat Systems Team Trainer

NAVPHIBSCOL CORONADO 20E19 Naval Gunfire System Mobile Team Trainer 20G7 Landing Craft Air Cushion (LCAC) Cockpit Familiarization Trainer 20G6 LCAC Team Trainer Simulator

SUBTRAFAC SAN DIEGO 15F12A Submarine Navigation and Piloting Team Trainer 21A43 Submarine Combat Systems Team Trainer 21C7 Mu1 ti -Class Advanced Submerged Control Trainer 21874 Passive Acoustic Analysis Trainer

Data extracted from: NAWCTSD Arlnual Report on Training Devices (Sections A, B, and C) . Activity UIC: NO0245

Quality of Life

47. Military Housing

a. Family Housing:

(1) Do you have mandatory assignment to on-base housing? NO

(2) For military family housing in your locale provide the following information:

Total Number of number of Number Number Number Type of Quarters Bedrooms units Adequate Substandard Inadequate

Officer 4+ 194 194 0 0

Officer 3 34 1 34 1 0 0

Officer 1 or2 24 2 4 0 0

Enlisted 4+ 1,605 1,605 0 0

Enlisted 3 2,853 2,853 0 0

En I isted 1 or 2 2,648 2,648 0 0 Mobile Homes 0 0 0 0 0 Mobile Home 0 108 108 0 0 lots

(3) In accordance with NAVFACINST 1 1010.44E, an inadequate facility cannot be made adequate for its present use through "economically justifiable means". For all the categories above where inadequate facilities are identified provide the following information:

NONE Faci l ity typelcode: What makes it inadequate? What use is being made of the facility? What is the cost to upgrade the facility to substandard? What other use could be made of the facility and at what cost? Current improvement plans and programmed funding: Has this facility condition resulted in C3 or C4 designation on your BASEREP? Activity UIC: NO0245

47.a.W Complete the following table for the rnilitary housing waiting list.

Pay Grade Number of Number on List' Average Wait Bedrooms

4+ 28 18-1 9 MONTHS

1 0 0

2 16 1 1-1 2 MONTHS 0-415 3 92 18-1 9 MONTHS

4+ 38 19-20 MONTHS

1 0 0

2 14 1 30-31 MONTHS 0-1 /2/3/CWO 3 67 13-14 MONTHS

4+ 3 8 23-24 MONTHS

1 0 0

2 72 22-23 MONTHS

3 185 23-24 MONTHS

4+ 127 36-37 MONTHS

1 50 8-9 MONTHS

2 1,684 16-1 7 MONTHS

3 1,575 27-28 MONTHS

4 722 23-24 MONTHS

MOBILE HOME 4 5 12-1 8 MONTHS E 1-E9 LOTS 'As of 3 1 March 1994 Activity UIC: NO0245

47.a.(5) What do you consider to be the top five factors driving the demand for base housing? Does it vary by grade category? If so provide details.

Top Five Factors Driving the Demand for Base Housing

1 COST - SAN DlEGO IS ONE OF THE MOST EXPENSIVE AREAS WlTHlN THE IN WHICH TO LIVE. AVERAGE MONTHLY RENTAL RATES EXCEED MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE HOUSING COST (MAHC) FOR MOST MILITARY PAY GRADES. GENERALLY, El-E6 PERSONNEL CAN ONLY AFFORD TO RENT HOMES IN HlGH CRIME NEIGHBORHOODS. El-E3 PERSONNEL CAN AFFORD ONLY ONE BEDROOM HOMES. FOUR BEDROOM HOMES ARE OUT OF REACH FOR ALL BUT 04 AND ABOVE PERSONNEL. A DECEMBER 1992 MARKET ANALYSIS INDICATES THlS PROBLEM WILL WORSEN WlTHlN TtiE NEXT FIVE YEARS. THE AVERAGE PRICE OF A SINGLE FAMILY HOME IN 1993 WAS $21 9,609 - WELL BEYOND THE MEANS OF MOST MILITARY FAMILIES. 2 SECURITY - DUE TO THE HlGH COST OF HOUSING IN SAN DIEGO, MANY FAMILIES ARE FORCED TO LIVE IN HlGH CRIME AREAS. GANG ACTIVITY AND OTHER TYPES OF CRIME CCIMMON TO MAJOR METROPOLITAN AREAS ARE PREVALENT WlTHlN THE REGION. SECURITY IS A PRIMARY CONCERN OF SERVICE MEMBERS WHOSE FAMILIES MUST FEND FOR THEMSELVES DURING DEPL0YME:NTS. 3 PROXIMITY TO WORULOCATION - MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING SITES ARE LOCATED WlTHlN MINUTES OF ALL ELEVEN MAJOR MILITARY INSTALLATIONS IN THE SAN DlEGO AREA. MANY SERVICE MEMBERS PREFER TO RESIDE CLOSE TO WORK TO LIMIT COMMUTE TIME, SAVE MONEY, AND FACILITATE RAPID RECALL. MOST HOUSING SITES ARE LOCATED CLOSE TO SUPPORT FACILITIES SUCH AS FAMILY SERVICE CENTERS, COMMISSARY AND EXCHANGE FACILITIES. SOME SITES ARE PARTICULARLY DESIRABLE DUE TO THEIR LOCATION. THE HOUSING SITES ON CORONADO, FOR EXAMPLE, HAVE THE LONGEST WAITING LISTS DUE TO THE QUIET ATMOSPHERE AND OUTSTANDING SCHOOLS LOCATED THERE. 4 COMMUNITY SUPPORT - MANY SERVICE MEMBERS AND THEIR DEPENDENTS CITE THE STRONG 130ND AND SUPPORT THEY RECEIVE FROM MILITARY NEIGHBORS AS A PRIMARY REASON FOR APPLYING FOR FAMILY HOUSING. THIS IS ESPECIALLY IMPORTANT TO FAMILIES WITH SPONSORS ATTACHED TO AFLOAT COMMANDS. - Activity UIC: NO0245

5 QUALITY OF FACILITIES - SAN DIEGO OFFERS MANY DIFFERENT TYPES OF HOMES. AGE, STYLE, AMENITIES, LOCATION VARIES FROM ONE SITE TO ANOTHER. SINGLE FAMILY, DUPLEX, TOWNHOMES AND APARTMENT STYLE HOMES ARE AVAILABLE. MANY NEW SITES HAVE BEEN ACQUIRED THROUGH THE "DIRECT PURCHASE: PROGRAM". THE PROGRAM ENABLES THE GOVERNMENT TO PURCHASE ENTIRE COMMUNITIES FROM DEVELOPERS. THESE MILITARY HOIJSING COMMUNITIES BLEND IN WITH OTHER CIVILIAN HOMES AS THEY WERE CONSTRUCTED TO BE RENTAL OR SALES PROPERTIES.

WHILE THE TOP FIVE FACTORS APPLY TO ALL CATEGORIES, THEY DO VARY IN ORDER OF IMPORTANCE DEPENDING; UPON THE GRADE. SENIOR OFFICER ARE MORE LIKELY TO CHOOSE FAMILY HOUSING DUE TO PROXIMITY TO WORK/LOCATION OR COMMUNITY SUPPORT. COST AND SECURITY ARE THE PRIMARY CONCERNS OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL.

(6) What percent of your family housing units have all the amenities required by "The Facility Planning & Design Guidel"Military Handbook 1190 & Military Handbook 1035-Family Housing)?

(7) Provide the utilization rate for family housing for FY 1993.

1 Type of Quarters Utilizatiori Rate

Adequate 98.39%

Substandard 0

Inadequate 0

(8) As of 31 March 1994, have you experienced much of a change since FY 19937 If so, why? If occupancy is under 98% ( or vacancy over 2%), is there a reason? Activity UIC: NO0245

47.b. BEQ:

(1) Provide the utilization rate for BEQs for FY 1993.

Type of Quarters Utilization Rate

Adequate 8 8 O/O

Substandard 92 O/O

Inadequate 0

(2) As of 31 March 1994, have you experienced much of a change since FY 19932 If so, why? If occupancy is under 95% (or vacancy over 5%), is there a reason?

YES, DUE TO THE INCREASE IN PRE-CON, OVERHAUL STATUS

(3) Calculate the Average on Board (AOB) for geographic bachelors as follows:

AOB = I# Geonra~hicBachelors x average number of davs in barracks) 365

(4) Indicate in the following chart the percentage of geographic bachelors (GB) by category of reasons for family separation. ProvEde comments as necessary.

Reason for Separation Number of Percent of Comments I from Family GB GB

Family Commitments 55 4 1 House for sale, too (children in school, expensive in SD, doesn't financial, etc.) want to relocate family Spouse Employment 6 5 (non-military)

Other 7 2 54 near retirement, etc

TOTAL 133 100

(5) How many geographic bachelors do not live on base? THIS INFORMATION IS NOT TRACKED AND THEREFORE IS NOT AVAILABLE.

29 Activity UIC: NO0245

47.c. BOQ:

(1) Provide the utilization rate for BOQs for FY 1993.

Type of Quarters Utilization Rate

Adequate 5 8 O/O

Substandard 75 O/O

Inadequate 0

(2) As of 31 March 1994, have you experienced much of a change since FY 19932 If so, why? If occupancy is under 95% (or vacancy over 5%), is there a reason?

NO.

(3) Calculate the Average on Board (AOB) for geographic bachelors as follows:

AOB = I# Geogra~hicBachelors x averaPe number of davs in barracks) 365

(4) Indicate in the following chart the percentage of geographic bachelors (GB) by category of reasons for family separation. Provide comments as necessary.

Reason for Separation Number of Percent of Comments I from Family GB GB

Family Commitments 6 5 0 '10 (children in school, financial, etc.)

Spouse Employment 2 1 7 '10 (non-military)

Other 4 3 3 O/O near retirement

TOTAL 12 100

(5) How many geographic bachelors do not live on base? THIS INFORMATION IS NOT TRACKED AND THEREFORE IS NOT AVAILABLE.

3(3 Activity UIC: NO0245

On Base MWR Facilities

48. For on-base MWR facilities' available, complete the following table for each separate location. For off-base government owned or leased recreation facilities indicate distance from base. If there are any facilities not listed, include them at the bottom of the table.

LOCATION Naval Station San Dieno DISTANCE ON BASE

Unit of Profitable Facility Measure Total (Y, N, MA)

Auto Hobby Indoor Bays 12 N Outdoor Bay(; 128 N

ArtsICrafts SF N/A N/A

Wood Hobby SF N/A N/A

Bowling Lanes 40 Y

Enlisted Club SF 22,750 Y

CPO Club SF 30,978 Y

Officer's Club SF 13/715 Y

Officer's Club SF 1,932 Y

Officer's Club Annex SF 4,752 Y

Library SF 12,326 Not MWR Facility

Library Books 2 7,000 Not MWR Facility Theater SF 9 76 Y

ITT SF 2,364 Y

Museum/Memorial SF N/A N/A > Pool (indoor) Lanes 10 N

Pool (outdoor) Lanes 8 N

Beach L F N/A N/A L Activity UIC: NO0245

Swimming Ponds Each N/A N/A

Tennis CT Each 14 N

Aerobics Center Each 1 N

Volleyball CT (outdoor) Each 6 N

Basketball CT (outdoor) Each 3 N Racquetball CT Each I 13 N

Golf Course Holes 9 Y

Driving Range Tee Boxes 40 Y

Putting Green Each 1 N

Gymnasium SF 18,957 N

Gymnasium SF 2,857 N

Fitness Center SF 8,524 N

Marina Berths N/A N/A

Stables Stalls N/A N/A

Softball Fld Each 11 N

Football Fld Each 1 N

Soccer Fld Each 1 N

Youth Center SF N/A N/A

Amusement Center SF 5,150 Y

Amusement Center SF 5,22 1 N

Golf Club House SF 828 N

Installation Restaurant SF 3,540 Y

Field House SF 40,000 N Petty Officers Club SF 19,333 Y - Activity UIC: NO0245

Picnic Areas Acres 4.5 N Horseshoe Pits Each 7 N

Amusement Center SF 960 N

LOCATION Mission Gorge Recreation Center and Murphy Canyon Youth Center DISTANCE 11 miles

Unit of Profitable FaciI ity Measure Total (y, N, N/A)

Auto Hobby Indoor Bays N/A N/A

Outdoor Bays N/A N/A

ArtsICrafts SF N/A N/A

Wood Hobby SF N/A N/A

Bowling Lanes N/A N/A

Enlisted Club SF N/A N/A

CPO Club SF N/A N/A

Officer's Club SF N/A N/A

Library SF N/A N/A

Library Books N/A N/A

Theater SF W /A N/A

ITT SF N/A N/A

MuseumlMemorial SF W /A N/A

Pool (indoor) Lanes IUA N/A

Pool (outdoor) Lanes 6 N

Beach LF N/A N/A

Swimming Ponds Each 1 N

Tennis Ct Each 12 N r - Activity UIC: NO0245

Horseshoe Pits Each 2 N Cook House Each 1 N

Snack Bar Each 2 Y

Equipment Each 1 N Checkout

Restaurant Each 1 Y

Picnic Area Acres 44 N RV Park Sites Each 28 Y Golf Shop Each 1 Y

Teen Center Each 1 N Volleyball Ct Each 2 N (outdoor)

Basketball Ct Each 8 N (outdoor)

Racquetball Ct Each N/A N/A

Golf Course Holes 36 Y

Driving Range Tee Boxes 25 Y

Gymnasium SF N/A N/A Fitness Center SF N/A N/A

Marina Berths N/A N/A

Stables Stalls W /A N/A

Softball Fld Each 8 N Football Fld Each 2 N

Soccer Fld Each 2 N

Youth Center SF '1 6,259 N

Picnic Sites Each ;! 0 N Activity UIC: NO0245

49. Is your library part of a regional interlibrary loan program?

50. Base Family Support Facilities and Progra~ns a. Complete the following table on the availability of child care in a child care center on your base.

Bldg 3320, 3320A, 273

Age Capacity SF Average Category (Children) Number Wait Adequate Substandard lnade 0n Wait (Days) quate List

0-6 MOS 8 15,098 * 6,498 0 42 365 (3320, (273) 3320A)

6-1 2 MOS 8 (B.3320, (6.273) 0 30 365 3320A) *

12-24 MOS 20 * 0 0 101 365

24-36 MOS 21 * 0 0 74 365

3-5 Yrs 238 * 0 0 32 30-60 * lotal SF for all age categories.

Bldg 1094

Age Capacity SF Average Category (Children) . Number Wait Adequate Substandard lnade 0n Wait (Days) quate List

0-6 MOS 4 8,400 * 0 0 2 1 365

6-1 2 Mos 4 * 0 0 15 365

12-24 MOS 10 * 0 0 20 365

24-36 MOS 14 * 0 0 32 365

3-5 Yrs 72 * 0 0 42 30-60 2 I nt~1CC fnr QII Qnnr~tnnnrinc Activity UIC: NO0245

b. In accordance with NAVFAClNST 1 1010.44E, an inadequate facility cannot be made adequate for its present use through "economically justifiable means." For all the categories above where inadequate facilities are identified provide the following information:

Facility type/code: What makes it inadequate? What use is being made of the facility? What is the cost to upgrade the facility to substandard? What other use could be made of the facility and at what cost? Current improvement plans and programmed funding: Has this facility condition resulted in C3 or C4 designation on your BASEREP? c. If you have a waiting list, describe what programs or facilities other than those sponsored by your command are available to accommodate those on the list.

PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COMMUNITY PROGRAMS, IE CENTERS, HOME CARE, ETC.

d. How many "certified home care providers" are registered at your base?

e. Are there other military child care facilities within 30 minutes of the base? State owner and capacity (i.e., 60 children, 0-5 yrs).

SUBASE - 79 CHILDREN, 3-5 YEARS; NTC -. 260 CHILDREN, 0-5 YEARS; NORTH ISLAND - 88 CHILDREN, 0-5 YEARS; IMPEKIAL BEACH - 140 CHILDREN, 0-5 YEARS; MIRAMAR - 266 CHILDREN, 0-5 YEARS; NAVAL HOSPITAL - 83 CHILDREN, 0-5 YEARS; NAVAL AMPHIBIOUS BASE - 98 CI-IILDREN, 0-5 YEARS Activity UIC: NO0245

51. Complete the following table for services available on your base. If you have any services not listed, include them at the bottom. Activity UIC: NO0245

7 7. FSC PN 30-40 Classrm/Auditorium

FSC PN 30-40 Classrm/Auditorium

Family Advocacy SF 12,960

Fleet & Family Support SF 6,480

Quiki Lube Each 1 - - NEX Car Wash Each 1

DAPMA SF 6,480

Red Cross SF 1,248

NavyIMarine Corp SF 10,296 Relief

Partner Health Plan SF 648 Service Center

Chaplain's Office SF 2,850

Religious Center SF 1,392

Religious Center SF 1,600

Religious Center SF 768

Religious Center SF 768

Religious Center SF 768

52. Proximity of closest major metropolitari areas (provide at least three):

City Distance (Miles)

SAN DIEGO .2

CHUM VISTA 5

NATIONAL CITY .2 Activity UIC: NO0245

53. Standard Rate VHA Data for Cost of Liv~ng:

Paygrade With Dependents Without Dependents

Source: FY94 Pay Table issued by Defense and Finance Accounting Service, Cleveland OH Activity UIC: NO0245

54. Off-base housing rental and purchase

a. Fill in the following table for average rental costs in the area for the period 1 April 1993 through 3 1 March 1994.

Average Monthly Rent Average Type Rental Monthly Annual tiigh Annual LOW Utilities cost

Efficiency $521 $52 1 $29

Apartment (1-2 Bedroom) $58 1 $58 1 $32

Apartment (3 + Bedroom) $823 $82 1 $62

Single Family Home (3 $823 $82 1 $62 Bedroom)

Single Family Home (4+ $1,026 $988 $97 Bedroom)

Town House (2 Bedroom) $700 $698 $34

Town House (3+ Bedroom) $823 $82 1 $62

Condominium (2 Bedroom) $700 $698 $34

Condominium (3 + Bedroom) $1,026 $988 $97

54.b. What was the rental occupancy rate in the community as of 31 March 19947

Type Rental f3ercent Occupancy Rate

Efficiency 95.04%

Apartment (1-2 Bedroom) 94.63% Apartment (3 + Bedroom) 93.07% Single Family Home (3 Bedroom) 93.07O10

Single Family Home (4+ Bedroom) 93.96%

Town House (2 Bedroom) 93.89% Town House (3 + Bedroom) 93.07% Condominium (2 Bedroom) 93.89%

Condominium (3+ Bedroom) 93.07% Activity UIC: NO0245

(c)What are the median costs for homes in the area?

Type of Home Median Cost

Single Family Home (3 Bedroom) $1 75,000

Single Family Home (4+ Bedroom) $175,000

Town House (2 Bedroom) $128,000

Town House (3 + Bedroom) $128,000

Condominium (2 Bedroom) $128,000

Condominium (3 + Bedroom) $128,000

54.d. For calendar year 1993, from the local MLS listings provide the number of 2, 3, and 4 bedroom homes available for purchase. Use only homes for which monthly payments would be within 90 to 110 percent of the E5 BAQ and VHA for your area.

IApriI 1223***1 24*** 1 3;* 1 May June * *

July * * * August * * *

September * * *

October * * * I November * * * I I December I * * * * NOTE: HISTORICAL DATA NOT AVAILABLE. * * NUMBERS PROVIDED ABOVE REFLECT CURRENT AVAILABILITIES. INFORMATION PROVIDED BY REMAX METRO. Activity UIC: NO0245

(e) Describe the principle housing cost drivers in your local area. (Cost drivers below were identified in a December 1992 Market Analysis prepared by Robert D. Neihaus, Inc.)

HOUSING COST IS CLOSELY CORRELATED WlTH LOCATION, AMOUNT OF LAND AND NUMBER OF BEDROOMS. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COASTAL REGIONS ARE AMONG THE MOST COSTLY IN CONUS. TEMPRATURES IN BOTH THE SUMMER AND WINTER ARE MODERATED BY WATERS OF THE PACIFIC OCEAN. AVERAGE DAILY MAXIMUM TEMPERATURES ARE APPROXIMATELY 65 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT DURlN THE WINTER AND 75 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT DURING THE SUMMER. TEMPERATURES BELOW FREEZING RARELY OCCUR. ANNUAL RAINFALL AVERAGES APPROXIMATELY NINE INCHES. ALTHOUGH MOST HOUSEHOLDS ARE LIKELY TO PREFER HOUSING CLOSE TO THE AMENITIES ASSOCIATED WlTH COASTAL COMMUNITIES, THE COST OF HOUSING IN THESE COMMUNITIES IS GENERALLY HIGHER TI-IAN LOCATIONS FURTHER INLAND. A WELL-DEVELOPED REGIONAL ROAD TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM OF INTERSTATE , STATE AND COUNTY HIGHWAYS SERVES THE AREA, AS DOES A SYSTEM OF CAUSEWAYS LINKING THE MAINLAND WlTH CORONADO AND NORTH ISLAND. AIR SERVICE IS AVAILABLE AT SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL AIRPOT (LINDBERGH FIELD), MONTGOMERY FIELD, AND RAMONA AIRPORT. PASSENGER AND FREIGHT RAIL SERVICE ARE PROVIDED BY AMTRAK AND THE SANTA FE RAILROAD, RESPECTIVELY. BUS AND TROLLEY SERVICE ARE AVAILABLE WITHIN THE AREA FOR LOCAL TRANSPORTATION.

SAN DIEGO HAS A DIVERSIFIED ECONOMIC BASE CHARACTERIZED BY SEVERAL KEY ELEMENTS:

- A WIDE RANGE OF AND SERVICE ACTIVITIES; - A LARGE MILITARY PRESENCE; - AN ACTIVE TOURISM SECTOR; - AN EDUCATIONAL COMPLEX CONSISTING OF CAMPUSES OF BOTH THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AND CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SYSTEMS AS WELL AS FIVE OTHER PRIVATE UNIVERSITIES AND COLLEGES; AND - A GROWING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT SECTOR SPECIALIZING IN HEALTH CARE SERVICES.

LOCAL FORECASTS OF POPULATION GROWTH INDICATE EXPECTED INCREASES THROUGH 1996 AVERAGING 2.1 PERCENT ANNUALLY. BOTH THE JOB AND POPULATION PROJECTIONS REFLECT A REDUCTION IN GROWTH COMPARED TO THE RAPID RATES OF THE PAST TWO DECADES. THE MAJOR INDUSTRY SECTORS IN THE COUNTY ARE THE SERVICES SECTOR, THE WHOLESALE AND RETAIL TRADE SECTORS AND THE CIVILIAN GOVERNMENT. A MILD RECOVERY IS PROJECTED FOR THE COUNTY WlTH EMPLOYMENT INCREASING SLOWLY. Activity UIC: NO0245

55. For the top five sea intensive ratings in the principle warfare community your base supports, provide the following:

Rating Number Sea Billets Number of Shore billets in the Local Area in the Local Area

0s 1340 15

BM 770 144

BT 489 150

MM 820 199

GMG 271 :L' 3 5 3t 5 \ - lo" 56. Complete the following table for the average one-way commute for the five largest concentrations of military and civilian personnel living off-base.

Location '10 Employees Distance (mi) Time(min)

SAN DlECO 28.0 15.75 17

NATIONAL CITY 5.84 4.0 5

IMPERIAL BEACH 5.07 9.0 10 7 SANTEP 1.69 '1 9.0 20

POWAY 1.06 20.0 22

NOTE: numbers provided by Comuter Computer. Activity UIC: NO0245

57. Complete the tables below to indicate the civilian educational opportunities available to service members stationed at the air station (to include any outlying fields) and their dependents:

57.a. List the local educational institutions which offer programs available to dependent children. Indicate the school type (e.9. DODDS, private, public, parochial, etc.), grade level (e.g. pre-school, primary, secondary, etc.), what students with special needs the institution is equipped to handle, cost of enrollment, and for high schools only, the average SAT score of the class that graduated in 1993, and the number of students in that class who enrolled in college in the fall of 1994.

Spec ia l Annua l 1993 % HS Institution Type Grade Education Enrollment Cost AVg Grad to Source of Info Levelcs) Available per Student SAT/ACT Higher Score Educ

San Diego Unified Public K-12 Yes $3800 * * SD Unified School Dist. School Dist. Enrollment of mi1 i tary dependents is p------p. p------p. 15291 students. Warner Union Elem. Pub1 ic K-8 unkn $3800 * * San Diego County Office School Dist. Enrollment is of Education 264 students

Sweetwater Union High Public Yes $3800 * * Sweetwater Union HS School Dist. Enrollment is District 1 9-12 28828 students

Soutl? Bay Union Elem Public K-6 Yes $3800 * * SB Union Dist. School Dist. Enrollment is 9785 students

San Ysidro Elem Pub1ic K-8 Yes $3800 * * SY School Dist. School Dist. Enrollment is 3834 students

Chula Vista Pub1ic K-6 Yes $3800 * * CV Elm School Dist. Elementary School Enrollment is Dist. 18581 students

Del Mar Union Elem. Pub1 ic K-6 Yes $3800 * * DM Union Dist School Dist. Enrollment is 1264 students

Santee Elementary Pub1 ic K-8 Yes $3800 * * Santee Elm School Dist. School Dist. Enrollment is 8200 students

Lemon Grove Publ ic K-8 Yes $3800 * * LG Elem School Dist. Elementary School Enrollment is Dist. 4280 students L Activity UIC: NO0245 - National Elementary Public K-6 Yes $3800 * * Natll Elem School Dist. School Dist. Enrollment is 6141 students

Valley Center Union Pub1 ic K-8 Yes $3800 * * VC School Dist Elem School Dist. Enrollment is 2400 students

Sante Fe Christian Private K-I2 No 83883 to $ 5478 * SFC School School

Cajon Valley Union Public K-8 Yes 83800 * * CV School District Elementary School Enrollment is Dist 18357 students

Alpine Union Public K-8 Yes $3800 * * Alpine School Dist. Elementary School Enrollment is Dist. 2110 students

Dehesa Elementary Public K-6 Yes 83800 * * Dehesa School Dist. School Dist Enrol lment is 194 students

Cardiff Elementary Pub1 ic K-6 Yes $3800 * * Cardiff School Dist. School Dist. Enrollment is 942 attidenis

Bonsal l Union Pub1 ic K-8 Yes $3800 * Bonsall Union School Elementary School Enrollment is Dist. Dist. 1238

Solana Beach Publ ic K-6 Yes $3800 * * Solana Beach School Dist. Elementary School Enrollment is Dist. 2040

Rancho Santa Fe Elem Public K-8 Yes 83800 * * Rancho Santa Fe School School Dist. Enrollment is Dist. 576 students

Vallecitos Elementary Public K-8 Yes $3800 * * Vailecitos School Dist. School Dist. Enrollment is 246 students

Spencer Valley Elem Pub1i c K-8 No 83800 * * Spencer Valley School School Dist Enrol lment is Dist. 31 students

Pam Elem School Public K-8 Yes $3800 * * Pauna School Dist. Dist Enrollment is " 400 students Activity UIC: NO0245

*

Encinitas Union Elem Pub1 ic K-6 Yes $3800 * * Encinitas School Dist. School Dist. Enrollment is 4834 students

Escondido Union High Publ ic 9-12 Yes $3800 * * same as above School Dist. Enrollment is 6400 students

Fallbrook Union High Public 9-12 Yes $3800 * * same as above School Dist. Enrollment is 2284 students

Julian Union High Public 9-12 unkn $3800 * * same as above School Dist. Enrollment is 265 students

San Dieguito Union Pub1 ic 9-12 unkn $3800 * * same as above High School Dist. Enrollment is 7303 students

Borrego Springs Pub1 ic K-8, 9-12 unkn $3800 * * Borrego Springs Unified Unified School Dist. Enrollment is School Dist. 443 students

Mountain Empi re Pub1i c K-6, unkn $3800 * * Mtn. Empire Unified Unified School Dist. 7-6, Enrol il~tentis School Dist. 9-12 ______--2000 students II Oceanside Unified Public K-6, unkn $3800 * * Oceanside Unified School School Dist. 7-8, 9-12 Enrollment is Dist. 18056 students

Ramona Unified School Public K-6, 7-8, unkn $3800 * * Ramona Unified School Dist. 9-12 Enrollment is Dist. 6500 students

San Marcos Unified Public K-6, 7-8, unkn $3800 * * San Marcos Unified School School Dist. 9-12 Enrollment is Dist. 10189 students

Vista Unified School Public K-6, 7-8, Yes $3800 * * Vista Unified School Dist. 9-12 Enrollment is Dist. 20700 students

Carlsbad Unified Public K-6, 7-8, unkn $3800 * t Carlsbad Unified School School Dist. 9-12 Enrollment is Dist. 6791 students.

Coronado Unified Publ ic K-6, 7-8, unkn $3800 * * Coronado Unified School School Dist. 9-12 Enrollment is Dist. 2321 students I Activity UIC: NO0245

Grossmont Union High Pub1 ic 9-12 Yes $3800 * * Grossmont Union High School Dist Enrollment is School Dist. 19636 students

Escondido Union Elm. Public K-8, 9-12, Yes $3800 * * Escondido Union Elem. School Dist preschools Enrollment is School Dist. 15673 students

Fallbrook Union Elm. Public K-8, 9-12 unkn $3800 * * Fallbrook Elem. School School Dist. Enrollment is Dist. 5715 students

Jamul-Dulzura Union Pub1i c K-8, 9-12 unkn $3800 * * Jamul-Dulzura Union Elm. Elem School Dist. Enrollment is School Dist. 1230 students

Julian Union Elm Public K-8 Yes $3800 * Julian Union Elem. School School Dist. Enrollment is Dist. 515 students

Lakeside Union Elm Pub1i c K-8, 9-12 unkn $3800 * * Lakeside Union Elem. School Dist. Enroltment is School Dist. 4903 students

La Mesa-Spring Valley Public K-8, 9-12, unkn $3800 * LaMesa-Spring Ya!!ey presehoois Enrollment is School Dist. 13992 students

San Diego Hebrew Day Private preschool unkn $5400 (K-3); unkn unkn San Diego Hebrew Day School preschool through $5750 (4-6); School through high $6200 (7-9) high school school

St. Augustine Private 9- 12 unkn $3930 to $4680 unkn unkn St. Augustine High High

Warren Walker Private Preschool No $5070 unkn unkn Uarren Ualker through 6

SD Jewish Academy Private K-9 No t6200to $6810 unkn unkn SD Jewish Academy

Luthern High School Private 9- --12 unkn unkn Luthern High Schoot

St. Therese Private preschool- unkn $1900to $2600 unkn unkn St. Therese through 8

La Jolla County Day Private preschool unkn $8000 unkn un kn La Jolla Country Day School through 12 (preschool School through 4); $8425 (5-8); $8750 (9-12) L r-' v- 8 .5 I- .-as .- L urn 2 2' Activity UIC: NO0245

57.b. List the educational institutions within 30 miles which offer programs off-base available to service members and their adult dependents. Indicate the extent of their programs by placing a "YesM or "NoH in all boxes as applies.

Program Type ( s) Institution Type Classes ~d~ltVocational Undergraduate Graduate High Technical School Courses Degree only Program Chapman Day NO NO None None None University Night No No None Yes Yes (B.A., (MBA, B.S.) MFCC, M.A., H.R.M.) National None None None None None University Day Night None Yes None Yes Yes (Parale (B.A.) (M.A., gal ) MBA ) University Day None None Yes Yes Yes of California (B.A., (M.A., at San B.S.) PhD) Diego Night None None Yes Yes Yes (B.A., (M.A., B.S) PhD) University Day None None Yes None None of California at San Diego Night None Yes Yes None None Extension Academy of Day No Yes Yes Yes Yes Art College (BFA) (MFA) Night No Yes Yes Yes Yes (BFA) (MFA) Edutek Day No Yes Yes No No Night No No No No No Maric Day No Yes Yes Yes No College (A.S.) Night No No No No No Pacific Day No Yes Yes No No Coast College Night No Yes Yes No No - Activity UIC: NO0245

Kelsey- Day NO Yes Yes Yes NO Jenney (A.A.) Night No Yes Yes Yes No (A.A.)

Coleman Day No Yes Yes Yes Yes College (A.S., (M.S., B.S.) MBA ) Night No Yes Yes Yes Yes (A.S., (M.S., B.S.) MBA)

Century No Yes Yes No No Business Day College Night No Yes Yes No No Advertising Day NO Yes Yes Yes NO Arts (A.A., College B.A.) Night No Yes Yes Yes No (A.A.,

\ B.A.)

~l Dorado Day No Yes Yes NO No College Niqht No No No No No ITT Day No Yes Yes Yes No Technical (A.S., Institute B.S.) Night No Yes Yes Yes No (A.S., B.S.)

San Diego Day No No Yes Yes Yes State (B.A., (PhD, University B.S.) MBA , M.A.) Night No No Yes Yes Yes (B.A., (PhD, B.S.) MBA , M.A.) ConCorde Day No Yes Yes No No Career Institute Night No No No No No

Platt Day No Yes Yes No No College Night No Yes Yes No No Activity UIC: NO0245

San Diego Yes Yes Yes Yes No Community Day College (A.A.) Night Yes Yes Yes Yes No (A.A.)

Point Lorna No No Yes Yes Yes Nazarene Day College (B.A., (M.A.) B.S.) Night No No Yes Yes No (B.A., B.S.) California NO No Yes Yes Yes Western Day Univ . (J.D.) School of Law Night NO NO NO NO NO

Grossmont Day No Yes Yes Yes No College (A.A.) Night No Yes Yes Yes No (A.A.) United No No Yes Yes No States Day Internation (A.A., a1 Univ. B.A., B.S.) Night No No Yes No Yes (M.A., MBA , DBA , MFCC, PsyD) -- . Southwester Day NO Yes Yes Yes No n College (A.A., A.S.) Night No Ye:; Yes Yes No (A.A., A.S.) Christian No No Yes Yes No Heritage Day College (B.A., B.S.) Night No No Yes Yes No (B.A., B.S.) Activity UIC: NO0245

5 Webster Day NO No NO NO NO University Night No No Yes Yes Yes (B.A.) (MBA, M.A.) New school Day No Yes Yes No No of Art & Architectur e Night No Yes Yes Yes Yes (A.A., (M.A.) B.A.) Palomar Day No Yes Yes Yes No College (A.A.) Night No Yes Yes Yes No (A.A.) University Day None None Yes Yes None of San (B.A., Diego B.S.) Night None None Yes Yes Yes (B.A., (M.A., B.S.) J.D., PhD , MBA ) Activity UIC: NO0245

57.c. List the educational institutions which offer programs on-base available to service members and their adult dependents. Indicate the extent of their programs by placing a "Yesu or I1Nolf in all boxes as applies.

Program Type ( s) Institution TYP~ Classes Adult High Vocational Undergraduate School Technical Gradua Courses Degree t e only Program Chapman None None None None None University Day Night Yes None Yes Yes None (B.A., ( MBA , B.S.) M.A.) Corres No No No No No ponden ce National Yes None Yes Yes None University Day Night Yes None Yes Yes Yes (A.A., (M.A.

B.A., 1 B.S.) MFCC,

Corres None None None None None ponden Egi ~1 ce

United Day None None None None No States Internationa ~i~ht Yes None None 1 University . None No Corres None No No No No ponden ce

San Diego Day Yes None Yes Yes None Communi t y College Night Yes None Yes Yes None (GED) (A.A.) Corres None None None None None ponden ce Activity UIC: NO0245 Activity UIC: NO0245

58. Spousal Employment Opportunities Provide the following data on spousal employment opportunities.

Number of Military Spouses Serviced by Family Local Service Center Spouse Employment Assistance Community Skill Level - Unemployment 1991 1992 1993 Rate

Professional * * * * * * *

Manufacturing ** * * * * *

Clerical * * t * * * *

Service * * * * * * *

TOTAL 763 1 049 1306 *

* NOTE: Unemployment rate for 1991-6.1 '10, 1992-7.4'10, 1993-7.8%. ** NOTE: Numbers are tracked by totals only, not available by profession.

59. Do your active duty personnel have any difficulty with access to medical or dental care, in either the military or civilian health care system? Develop the why of your response.

MEDICAL RESPONSE: Active duty personnel do have difficulty obtaining Primary Care due to facility limitations and staffing. Active duty do not have direct access to the civilian health care system and must seek care within the MHSS. Although access varies from setting to setting, there are constraints on access to various levels of care with long waiting times for specialty appoinments (e.g. orthopedics) and limited availability of some very specialized servicesltreatments (e. g. mental health).

Active duty personnel are required to use the MHSS, which is limited in its ability to service the patents in a timely fashion. This Medical Center is a tertiary referral center and operates GME programs which, in order to remain viable (in terms of accreditation), must treat a wide range of disorders (and age groups) not available in the younger and physically healthier active duty population. The case selection necessary to achieve the proper case-mix often leads to situations in which non-active-duty patients must be accepted preferentially, resulting in limitations of the availability of specialty care appointments for active duty members. Non-activeduty beneficiaries may access local civilian care under CHAMPUS (TRICARE), however, active duty members must often travel considerable distances to the nearest tertiary center and wait for an appointment availability. Activity UIC: NO0245

The NMCSD was originally designed in the 1970's for inpatient stays. Medical Officer examination rooms were not configured for outpatient care. Outpatient services were to be performed in branch medical centers which have limited space and personnel. Ideally, the Medical Officer should have two treatment rooms and one medical office to maximize eficiency of patient care delivery.

DENTAL RESPONSE: A survey was conducted April 1994. 103 suveys were collected and the results were as follows:

84% of 103 respondents surveyed said "It was easy to get an appointment at the clinic".

83% of 103 respondents stated that they were able to schedule a required follow- up appointment.

based on the above statistics as well as input from Fleet and Shore Liaison Officers, there is no difficulty in access to dental care aboard NDC, San Diego.

DENTAL CLINIC WITHIN NAVAL MEDICAL CENTER RESPONSE: Active duty do not have difficulty with access to dental care. Active duty seeking dental care at the Naval Medical Center, San Diego are evaluated and treated within the time periods for specific entities as follows:

Annual dental exam- within 24 hrs. Emergency exam- within 24 hrs. Emergency treatment- within 24 hrs. Admission for emergency- within 24 hrs. TMJ exam- within 2 weeks. Major surgery eval- within 2 weeks. Major surgery treatment- within 1 month.

60. Do your military dependents have any difficulty with access to medical or dental care, in either the military or civilian health care system? Develop the why of your response.

MEDICAL RESPONSE: Military dependents have difficulty accessing the MHSS (especially to the severely limited primary care) because the MHSS is inadequate sized to support the numbers of beneficiaires requiring health care services. However, dependents may access the civilian health care system under CHAMPUS (TRICARE) with relative ease, though the co-pay has in the past been a deterrent to some beneficiaries. Activity UIC: NO0245

DENTAL RESPONSE: Approximately 97% of patents accessing dental clinic are active duty members.

Family members are utilizing "Dependent Dental Care Plan" (DDP) without difficulty in majority of cases.

Family members not using DDP are able to access military dental care on a humanitarian basis for relief of pain.

DENTAL CLINIC WITHIN NAVAL MEDICAL CENTER RESPONSE: Military dependents do not have difficulty with access to dental care. Military dependents seeking dental care at the Naval Medical Center, San Diego are evaluated and treated within the time periods for the specific entities as follows:

Annual dental exam- Delta Dental Plan. Emergency exam- within 24 hrs. Emergency treatment- within 24 hrs. Amission for emergency- within 24 hrs. TMJ exam- within 3 weeks or CHAMPUS referred. Major surgery eval- within 2 weeks or CHAMPUS referred. Major surgery treatment- within 1 month.

61. Complete the table below to indicate the crime rate for your air station for the last three fiscal years. The source for case category definitions to be used in responding to this question are found in NClS - Manual diated 23 February 1989, at Appendix A, entitled "Case Category Definitions." Note: the crimes reported in this table should include 1) all reported criminal activity which occurred on base regardless of whether the subject or the victim of that activity was assigned to or worked at the base; and 2) all reported criminal activity off base.

Crime Definitions FY 1991 FY 1992 FY 1993

1. Arson (6A) 6 25 24 Base Personnel - military 5 20 23 Base Personnel - civilian 1 5 1 Off Base Personnel - military * * * * * * Off Base Personnel - civilian - Activity UIC: NO0245 - - 2. Blackmarket (6C) 0 0 0

Base Personnel - military 0 0 0

Base Personnel - civilian 0 0 0 Off Base Personnel - military * * * Off Base Personnel - civilian * * * - - -pp 3. Counterfeiting (6G) 0 0 0

Base Personnel - military 0 0 0

Base Personnel - civilian 0 0 0 Off Base Personnel - military * * * Off Base Personnel - civilian * * *

4. Postal (6L) 0 0 0 Base Personnel - military 0 0 0 Base Personnel - civilian 0 0 0

Off Base Personnel - military * * L Off Base Personnel - civilian * * *

5. Customs (6M) 0 0 0

Base Personnel - military 0 0 0

Base Personnel - civilian 0 0 0 Off Base Personnel - military * * * Off Base Personnel - civilian * * * 6. Burglary (6N) 177 226 212 Base Personnel - military 135 190 1 70 Base Personnel - civilian 42 3 6 42 Off Base Personnel - military * * * Off Base Personnel - civilian 15.1 13.2 12.1 k Activity UIC: NO0245

7. Larceny - Ordnance (6R) 0 0 0 Base Personnel - military 0 0 0 Base Personnel - civilian 0 0 0 Off Base Personnel - military * * *

Off Base Personnel - civilian 39.6 29.6 2 7.7 - - 8. Larceny - Government (6s) 187 315 353 Base Personnel - military 157 265 298 Base Personnel - civilian 30 50 55 Off Base Personnel - military * * * Off Base Personnel - civilian * * *

9. Larceny - Personal (6T) 442 545 427 Base Personnel - military 38 1 502 386 Base Personnel - civilian 6 1 43 4 1 Off Base Personnel - military * * * Off Base Personnel - civilian 39.6 29.6 2 7.7 10. Wrongful Destruction (6U) 450 495 425 Base Personnel - military 40 1 432 372 Base Personnel - civilian 49 63 53 Off Base Personnel - military * * * Off Base Personnel - civilian * * * 4. Activity UIC: NO0245

4 1 1. Larceny - Vehicle (6V) 43 77 53 Base Personnel - military 39 72 5 1 Base Personnel - civilian 4 5 2 Off Base Personnel - military * * * Off Base Personnel - civilian 18.8 13.0 12.5 12. Bomb Threat (7B) 0 0 0

Base Personnel - military 0 0 0 Base Personnel - civilian 0 0 0 Off Base Personnel - military * * * Off Base Personnel - civilian * * *

13. Extortion (7E) 0 0 0 Base Personnel - military 0 0 0 Base Personnel - civilian 0 0 0 Off Base Personnel - military * * * Off Base Personnel - civilian * * * 14. Assault (7G) 224 2 64 173 Base Personnel - military 182 22 1 151 Base Personnel - civilian 42 43 2 1 Off Base Personnel - military * * * Off Base Personnel - civilian 6.9 5.9 5.4 15. Death (7H) 4 4 3 Base Personnel - military 3 4 3 Base Personnel - civilian 1 0 0 Off Base Personnel - military * * * Off Base Personnel - civilian .02 .O1 .O1 Activity UIC: NO0245

h 16. Kidnapping (7K) 0 0 0

Base Personnel - military 0 0 0

Base Personnel - civilian 0 0 0 Off Base Personnel - military * * * Off Base Personnel - civilian * * *

18. Narcotics (7N) 17 18 29

Base Personnel - military 17 15 27

Base Personnel - civilian 0 3 2 Off Base Personnel - military * * * Off Base Personnel - civilian * * *

19. Perjury (7P) 0 0 0

Base Personnel - military 0 0 0

Base Personnel - civilian 0 0 0 Off Base Personnel - military * * *

Off Base Personnel - civilian * * L

20. Robbery (7R) 8 16 14

Base Personnel - military 8 13 12

Base Personnel - civilian 0 3 2 Off Base Personnel - military * * *

Off Base Personnel - civilian 2.4 3.3 2.8

2 1. Traffic Accident (7T) 754 838 75 3

Base Personnel - military 685 7 74 70 1 Base Personnel - civilian 69 64 52 Off Base Personnel - military * * * Off Base Personnel - civilian * * * Activity UIC: NO0245

22. Sex Abuse - Child (8B) 0 0 0

Base Personnel - military 0 0 0

Base Personnel - civilian 0 0 0 Off Base Personnel - military * * * Off Base Personnel - civilian * * *

23. Indecent Assault (8D) 0 0 0

Base Personnel - military 0 0 0

Base Personnel - civilian 0 0 0 Off Base Personnel - military * * * Off Base Personnel - civilian * * *

24. Rape (8F) 4 6 7

Base Personnel - military 3 6 5

Base Personnel - civilian 1 0 2 Off Base Personnel - military * * *

Off Base Personnel - civilian 0.4 0.4 0.3

25. Sodomy (8G) 0 0 0

Base Personnel - military 0 0 0

Base Personnel - civilian 0 0 0 Off Base Personnel - military * * * Off Base Personnel - civilian * * *

* Naval Station does not keep off-base crime stastics in the format requested. The following are the crime stastics for County of San Diego from the FBI Index Crime Rate, not all categories of crimes described above are reflected as they are considered "part 2" crimes and are not included in this index. Source is the San Diego Association of governments, Criminal Justice Research Division report "Crime in the San Diego Region 1993" dated March 1994: (All numbers are Crirne per 1,000 population) BRAC-95 CERTIFICATION DATA CALL THIRTY SEVEN

NAVSTA SAN DIEGO

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. MAJOR CLAIMANT LEVEL

J. R. FITZGERALD NAME (Please type or print) Commander In Chief 1'4 SUL '3'f Title (Acting) Date

U. S. Pacific Fleet Activity

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

DEPUTY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS (LOGISTICS) DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF

W. A. EARNM NAME (Please type or print) Signature

Title BRAC 95 DATA CALL THIRTY SEVEN I NAVAL STATION SAN DIEGO I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

TYPE COMMANDER LEVEL

# - DATE : d1.3 174 OBINSON, VADM, USN COMMANDER, NAVAL SURFACE FORCE, U.S. PACIFIC FLEET

,494 kJ DATE: 6 D. G. ROACH, CAPT, CEC, USN FORCE CIVIL-ENGINEER ' COMMANDER, NAVAL SURFACE FORCE, U.S. PACIFIC FLEET

DATE : !/'&v FORCE FACILITIES PLANNER COMMANDER, NAVAL SURFACE FORCE, U.S. PACIFIC FLEET

-- BRAC-93 CERTIFICATION Reference: SECNAV MSG 0514102 AUG 92 In accordance with policy set forth by the Secretary of the Navy, personnel of the department of the Navy, uniformed and civilian, who provide information for use in the BRAC-93 process are required to provide a signed certification that states "1 certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief." The signing of this certification constitutes a representation that the certifying official has reviewed the information and either (1) personally vouches for its accuracy and completeness or (2) has possession of, and is relying upon, a certification executed by a competent subordinate. Each individual in your activity generating information for the BRAC-93 process must certify that information. Enclosure (1) is provided for individual certifications and may be duplicated as necessary. You are directed to maintain those certifications at your activity for audit purposes. For purposes of this certification sheet, the commander of the activity will begin the certification process and each reporting senior in the Chain of Command reviewing the information will also sign this certification sheet. This sheet must remain attached to this package and be forwarded up the chain of Com- mand. copies must be retained by each level in the Chain of Command for audit purposes. I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. ACTIVITY COWDER

M. V. DANIEL@. CDR. USN ID,. NAME (Please type or print) Signature

ACTING COMMANDING OFFICER - 6-1- 4Y Title Date NAVAL STATION. SAN DIEGO. CA.. Activity

Enclosure (1) BRAC-95 CERTIFICATION DATA CALL SIX NAVSTA SAN DIECO

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

R. J. ZLATOPER NAME (Please type or print) kmander In Cbiel Title U. S. Pacific Fleet Activity

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

DEPUTY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS (LOGISTICS) DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF (INSTALLATIONS& LOGISTICS) A ,- .- .* . W. A. EARNER :,'it NAME (Please type or print) Signature

Title Date BRAC 95 DATA CALL SIX REVISION NAVAL STATION SAN DIEGO I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

TYPE COMMANDER LEVEL

DATE : /4/9J- DAVID G. ROACH, APT, CEC, USN

FORCE CIVIL ENGINEER-- COMMANDER, NAVAL SURFACE FORCE, U.S. PACIFIC FLEET

DATE : fi/r~ 0TREV NO FORCE FACILITIES PLANNER COMMANDER, NAVAL SURFACE FORCE, U.S. PACIFIC FLEET CAPACITY ANALYSIS

DATA CALL WORK SHEET

FOR NAVY BASE:- NAVAL STATION SAN DIEGO

BASE PRIMARY U1C:-NO0245 (Insert this UIC in "Header A' on every page)

Category...... Operational Support Sub-category...... Naval Bases

********If any responses are classified, attach separate classified annex.********* *

4 June 1994 Naval Station Listing

I Type Title I Location LMAY 94 SUBMARINE BASE NAVSUBASE NEW LONDON GROTON CT NAVAL STATION NAVAL STATION .ANNAPOLIS ANNAPOLIS MD AMPHIBIOUS BASE I NAVPHIBASE LITTLE CREEK ~0~~~1 NAVAL STATION NAVAL STATION NORFOLK NORFOLK VA SUBMARINE BASE NAVSUBASE KINGS BAY KINGS BAY GA NAVAL STATION 1 NAVAL STATION MAYPORT I MAYPORT FL 11 NAVAL STATION NAVAL STATION PASCAGOULA PASCAGOULA MS NAVAL STATION NAVAL STATION lNGLESIDE INGLESIDE TX NAVAL STATION NAVAL STATION ROOSEVELT ROOSEVELT ROAD ROADS PR SUBMARINE BASE I SUBMARINE BASE BANGOR I SILVERDALE WA 11 NAVAL STATION I NAVAL STATION EVERETT 1 EVERETT WA I I NAVAL STATION NAVAL STATION SAN DIEGO SAN DIEGO CA NAVPHIBASE CORONADOCA SAN DIEGO CA NAVAL STATION NAVAL STATION PEARL HARBOR PEARL HARBOR HI I SUBMARINE BASE SUBMARINE BASE SAN DIEGO SAN DIEGO CA SUBMARINE BASE SUBMARINE BASE PEARL HARBOR PEARL HARBOR HI NAVAL STATION NAVAL STATION GUAM GUAM NA VAL AIR STATION NA VAL AIR STATION NORTH ISLAND SAN DIEGO CA Data for Capacity Analysis Table of Contents Ship Operational Information

Force Structure Active carriers and warships Reserve carriers and warships Amphibious and mine warfare ships Submarines Logistics, auxiliary, and sealift ships Other ships Operational Units Reserve Units and Demographics

Cold iron berthing capacity Pier capacity Pier support characteristics Cold iron berthing loading Pier Planned Improvements in Ship Berthing Capacity Other pier loading information

Ship Support capacity IMA Maintenance Loading IMA Maintenance Support Capacity Drydock data Crane data Tug data Ship camel data

Personnel Support Capacity Training Facilities Berthing and Messing

Base Infrastructure Base Infrastructure Facilities Maintenance Requirements Real Estate

Weapons Stowage

Aircraft Basing Naval Station Capacity Analysis Data Call UIC: NO0245

9. List all operating forces and operational staffs (CARGRU, DESRON, SUBRON, etc.) not listed in questions 3 through 8 above that will be home based at your base at the end of the indicated fiscal years. For each unit provide the listed support requirements. Table 9.1 - Change Unit ID Onboard Onboard Onboard Onboard Onboard Indoor Outdoor Special ~4644- CPF FY FY FY FY FY SF reqd SF reqd Facilities MAY 94 1994 1995 1997 1999 2001 required 11 (PN) (PN) (PN) (PN) IPN) N55501 57 57 55 55 55 7,575 NONE Secure Conference Room & Storage N55780 57 57 55 55 5 5 7,300 NONE NONE N55775 57 Decom 7,642 NONE NONE N0116a 12 12 12 12 12 3,000 NONE NONE N0114a 12 12 12 12 12 1,350 NONE NONE N0126a 12 Decom NONE NONE' NONE 1,200 NONE NONE N0122a 20 20 15 15 15 2,250 NONE NONE N52725 19 19 15 15 15 3,496 NONE NONE N0172a 36 Decom 3,668 NONE NONE N52739 46 46 45 45 45 14,200 NONE Secure Conference Room & Storage N46698 24 Decom 4,83 0 NONE NONE N55297 29 29 29 29 29 3,500 NONE NONE N55281 29 29 29 29 29 3,500 NONE NONE N55269 29 29 29 29 29 3,500 NONE NONE N55298 32 30 29 29 29 3,496 NONE NONE N0130a 12 12 12 12 12 2,475 NONE NONE NO0324 17 13 13 13 13 2,475 NONE NONE N0132a 12 12 12 12 12 1,350 NONE NONE Naval Station Capacity Analysis Data Call UIC: NO0245

- 10. Reserve Support Capacities

10.a. List all reserve units (USNR, USMCR, USAFR, ANG, USAR, ARNG) that train at this installation. Table 10.1

Reserve Unit Training Function / Facilities Used RNMCB 15 VARIOUS CONSTRUCTION TRAINING PROJECTS EODMU 7 TRAINING FOR EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE MOBILE UNIT OPS

- 10.b. For each USNR and USMCR ship homeported or unit that trains at your facility, provide the number of authorized billets and number of personnel actually assigned to the unit for the past three fiscal years. Include both Selected Reserves (SELRES) and Training and Administration of Reserves (TAR) Navy / Full Time Support (FTS) Marine Corps reservists. Explain differences between authorized and actual manning. Table 10.2

Unit: FY 1991 FY 1092 FY 1993 Change N4644- CPF MAY 94 I

Auth Actual Auth Actual Auth Actual

SELRES TAIUFTS SELRES TAWFTS SELRES TAR/FTS SELRES TAIUFTS SELRES TARFTS SELRES TAWIT S Unit: RNMCB 15 Enlisted 8 1 8 1 8 1 8 1 8 1 8 1 Officer 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Unit: EODMU 7 Enlisted 5 17 5 17 5 17 5 17 5 17 5 17 Officer 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 Naval Station Capacity Analysis Data Call UIC: NO0245

IMA/UIC: SIMA SAN DIEGO 1 N65918 Table 16.1

Ship Avg. man-hrs expended per ,4vg # of days in docWyr Fleet reqd wkslyear in Class ship per year for class operating cycle availability per ship FY9 1 FY92 FY93 FY91 FY92 FY93

AD 288.3 435.0 1202.2 N/A 6 6 6 AE 1918.0 29.0 113.2 N/A 6 6 6 AFDM 5250.0 1381.0 2498.0 N/A 6 6 6 CG 9390.6 8638.8 11750.0 NIA 6 6 6 CGN 3661.4 1590.4 4610.1 N/A 6 6 6 CV 5595.9 3840.8 4368.5 N/A 6 6 6 CVN 162.0 115.8 1040.3 N/A 6 6 6 DD 7922.3 5548.5 6739.4 N/A 6 6 6 DDG 6878.3 4512.3 12295.1 N/A 6 6 6 FF 5417.1 3903.4 8810.2 N/A 6 6 6 FFG 5972.0 6185.5 6697.8 N/A 6 6 6 LHA 3047.8 7083.4 9187.2 N/A 6 6 6 LHD 0.0 217.5 4884.2 N/A 6 6 6 LKA 2816.1 5245.1 11519.7 N/A 6 6 6 LPD 9723.1 11788.1 21233.4 N/A 6 6 6 LPH 7199.8 20258.9 17900.9 N/A 6 6 6 LSD 4630.6 5585.3 13305.6 N/A 6 6 6 LST 9129.0 5539.3 12481.7 NIA 6 6 6 MISC (1) 18742 21312 48851 N/A 0 0 0

(I) MISC INCLUDES ALL SHIP CLASSES NOT PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED.

Change H4644- CPF -MAY 94 Naval Station Capacity Analysis Data Call UIC: NO0245

16.b. List the projected work load at the same IMA for each class of ship.

SHIP LOADING AND MAN-HOURS PER SHIP WERE PROVIDED BY THE SAN Naval Station Capacity Analysis Data Call UIC: NO0245

16.c. If some IMA level work is contracted to civilian (non-DON) activities, provide the navy contract manager and estimate the equivalent man-hours of service provided by those contractors in the listed fiscal years. List projected contractor IMA workload for the fiscal years 1995 through 200 1.

INFORMATION IS NOT ACCUMULATED BY MAN HOURS. EFFORTS TO RECONSTRUCT THIS DATA WOULD REQUIRE EXTENSIVE TIME CONSUMING MANUAL RESEARCH. EACH SERVICE CONTRACT WOULD HAVE TO BE REVIEWED AND ANALYZED TO DETERMINE THE NUMBER OF IMA LEVEL MAN- HOURS EXPENDED. TABLE 16.3

FISCAL $ ROV NUMBER SVC REPAIR(2) WORK YEAR FUNDS CONTRACTS $ AMOUNT CONTRACTS (X 1000) CONTRACTS (X 1000) 1991 30,544 3,509 7,350 6,248 1992 28,656 4,304 7,778 6,611 1993 33,252 4,300 7,8 18 6,645 1994 28,050 4,300 8,037 6,83 1 1995 28,835 4,300 8,262 7,023 1996 29,672 4,300 8,502 7,226 1997 30,562 4,300 8,757 7,443 1998 3 1,479 4,300 9,019 7,666 1999 32,423 4,300 9,290 7,896 2000 33,396 4,300 9,569 8,133 200 1 34,398 4,300 9,856 8,377

2. 85% OF SERVICE CONTRACTS ARE FOR IMA LEVEL WORK CONTRACTED TO CIVILIAN (NON-DON) ACTIVITIES. Naval Station Capacity Analysis Data Call UIC: NO0245

MAINTENANCE SUPPORT CAPACITY

17. For any Shore Based Intermediate Maintenance Facility, list the following:

17.a. List the size and the condition of the intermediate maintenance facility located at the installation. CCN refers to the five digit category code number from NAVFAC P-80. Table 17.1 Facility Name/ Function CCN Adequate Substandard Inadequate (sq ft) (sq ft) (sq ft) BLDG. #7, SUPPLY 441 10 46,640 BLDG. #17, LIFEBOAT REPAIR 21330 12,366 BLDG. #20, SIMA 21330 41,000 BLDG. #36, SIMA 61010 31,812 BLDG. #3338, MAINT SHOPS 21330 32,249 BLDG. #3339, SIMA 21300 44,968 BLDG. #3418, METAL TRADES 21330 78,396 BLDG. #37, ENGINE SHOPS 21330 12,066 BLDG. #61, MACHINE SHOP 21330 46,800 BLDG. #62, FOUNDRY SHOP 21330 13,589 BLDG. #86, SIMA 21330 9,578 BLDG. #123, 21330 24,900 SHEETMETAL/CORROSION BLDG. #126, AUX MACH REPR 2 1330 15,3 18 BLDG. #130, NON-DESTR-TEST 21330 4,877 BLDG. #149, SHIPS STORAGE 21377 1,617 BLDG. #245, FLEET VALVEMT 21330 1,200 BLDG. #415, IND LAB STOR 21330 156 - BLDG. #3053, ANTENNA SHOP 21330 6,400 - Naval Station Capacity Analysis Data Call UIC: NO0245

Facility Name/ Function CCN Adequate Substandard Inadequate (sq ft) (sq ft) (sq ft) BLDG. #3222, TRANS 61010 512 BLDG. #3278, MAINT SHOPS 21330 59,310 BLDG. #3226, STORAGE SHED 21330 800 BLDG. #3327, FLAME SPRAY 21330 240 BLDG. #3052, STORAGE 21377 140

In accordance with NAVFACINST 1 101 0.44E,an inadequate facility cannot be made adequate for its present use through "economically justifiable means". For all the categories above where inadequate facilities are identified describe why the facility is inadequate; indicate how the facility is being used and list other possible uses; and specify the costs to remove the deficiencies that make it inadequate. Indicate if current budget program includes any of the required funds.

17.b. Assuming that the shore intermediate maintenance facilities can be fully staffed with appropriately skilled workers and procurement clerks and that sufficient funding is available for all parts support, what would be the maximum ship intermediate maintenance capability of this installation. For this question, assume that all currently programmed improvements are executed and assume that all current depot work remains at the depot level.

REPAIR PERSONNEL 1,380 X HOURS PER YEAR 2.080 HOURS AVAILABLE 2,870,400 HISTORICAL AVG OF PRODUCTION TIME 45%

AVAILABLE PRODUCTION HOURS: 1,291,680

Change M4644- CP F 41 %- PRODUCTION SUPPORT MAN HOURS, IE, PLANNING, SUPPLKADP, ADMIN, MAY 94 MANAGEMENT, ETC. - Naval Station Capacity Analysis Data Call UIC: NO0245

17.c. What plant modifications/facility improvements are budgeted in Presidential Budget 1995 through FY 1997 (including all BRAC!ON) that would improve the production work capability at the ashore intermediate maintenance facility? Provide a description, cost, and additional capacity (in man-hours) that could be realized.

NO FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS ARE BUDGETED WHICH WILL IMPROVE PRODUCTION CAPACITY.

17.d. Given unconstrained funding and manning levels, what Industrial Plant Equipment (IPE) would you change (add, delete, or modify) to increase the shore IMA production work capacity? Provide a description, cost estimates, and additional capacity (in man-hours per year) that could be realized.

EQUIPMENT NOMENCLATURE CHANGE COST MANHOURSNR

1. FOUNDRY SAND TRANSFER1 ADD 90K 7,800 TREATMENT SYSTEM

2. POWDER COAT OVEN AND ADD lOOK 10,140 CONVEYOR SYSTEM

3. NEW TECHNOLOGY CNC MODIFY 420K 29,120 (7 MACHINES)

17.e. Are there any environmental, legal or other factors that inhibit further increase in productive work capacity at the shore IMA (e.g. encroachments, pollutant discharge, etc.)? Provide details and possible solutions.

PRESENT AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD PERMITS WOULD HAVE TO BE REVISED TO ALLOW FOR GREATER DISCHARGE LEVELS. NOT ALL PERMITS ALLOW FOR 24 HOUR USE OF THE PERMITTED OPERATION. (I.E. THE PRESENT PERMIT FOR ANTENNA REPAIR, SHOP 67H, ONLY ALLOWS FOR 3 GALLONS OF COATING TO BE APPLIED PER DAY).

17.f. State the percent of the maintenance work day lost to military duties (GMT, Training, etc.) during the normal day shift. Naval Station Capacity Analysis Data Call UIC: NO0245

17.g. Provide the man-hours expended by shore based intermediate maintenance activities for the listed years in the following categories: Table 17.2

IMA: SIMA SD FY 1990 FY 1991 FY 1992 FY 1993 FY 1994' (K man-hr) (k man-hr) (k man-hr) (k man-hr) (k man-hr) Ship * N/A N/ A N/A N/ A NIA Modernization (non-nuclear) Ship * N/A N/A N/A N/ A N/A Modernization (nuclear) Ship Repair 1060.67 95 1.29 952.52 858.85 715.85 (non-nuclear) Ship Repair 12.07 20.35 13.89 24.85 8.50 (nuclear) Aircraft N/ A N/A N/A N/A N/A Maintenance Facility/IPE 97.99 84.29 38.33 37.11 39.01 Maintenance Other 70.05 68.67 79.73 84.84 70.45 Maintenance2

'Projected man hours. 2~escribemaintenance in this category. MAINTENANCE PERFORMED ON A REIMBURSABLE BASIS FOR LOCAL SHORE ACTIVITIES.

* INFOWTION IS NOT ACCUMULATED THIS WAY DUE TO THE SMALL QUANTITY OF MODERNIZATION WORK: BEING DONE. THIS WILL REQUIRE EXTENSIVE, TIME CONSUMING RESEARCH TO ANSWER. Naval Station Capacity Analysis Data Call UIC: NO0245

SHIP SUPPORT CAPACITY

18. List the government drydocks (floating or graving) owned by the base or tenant activities. For each drydock indicate its maximum lift, ship classes for which NAVSEA has certified the dock, and number of days in use in FY 1991, 1992, 1993. Indicate the number of days climate prevented painting and prese:rvation of docked ship external hull in FY 1993.

Drydock Maximum Ship Classes Da:ys in use Climate Limited Capacity that can be days docked FY91 FY92 FY93 FY91 FY92 FY93

DD- 1 33,000 TN LPH 270 270 270 0 0 0 Graving

AFDM 9,700 TN Cruiser 365 365 365 0 0 0 Floating

'NAVSEA certification for docking. Naval Station Capacity Analysis Data Call UIC: NO0245

19. Provide the same data for commercial drydocks in the harbor complex.

NASSCO Table 19.1

Drydock Maximum Ship Classes Days in use Climate Limited days Change Capacity that can be 114644- CPF docked MAY 94 I

FY91 FY92 FY93 FY91 FY92 FY93

BLDG 30,000 TN LST, LPD, 0 56 67 0 0 0 DOCK LSD, T-AH, T-ATF NASSCO 20,750 TN LST, FFS, 275 293 140 0 0 0 BUILDER FF,LPH,CG * * MSO, AOE,T- ARC, APLS YON'S, ASR

** INCLUDES MSC SHIPS. Naval Station Capacity Analysis Data Call UIC: NO0245

S.W. MARINE Table 19.1

Drydock Maximum Ship Days in use ' Climate Limited days Change Capacity Classes ~4644- CPF that can MAY 94 be docked I

FYI991 FYI992 FYI993 FYI991 FYI992 FY1993

* * NAVSEA SMALL 176 175 223 APP 30 APP 30 APP 30 P.O.S.D. CERT. SERVICE 17,500 CRAFT TON ONLY ** EX- NO SMALL 0 107 33 APP 30 APP 30 APP 30 AFDL-48 NAVSEA SERVICE CERT. CRAFT 4000 TON ONLY 900 TON SUALL 110 0 0 APP 30 WAYS I1 SER VICE CRAFT ONLY WAYS 700 TON SMALL 113 0 0 APP 30 I11 SER VICE CRAFT ONL Y

** PRIDE OF SAN DIEGO HAS NAVSEA CEI2T. FOR 17,500 TON. COMMERCIAL CERT. IS 26,000 TON. ** EX-AFDL-48 IS NOT CERTIFIED WiNAVSEA. SERVICE CRAFT DOCKED DID NOT REQUIRE CERTIFIED DOCK.

'NAVSEA certification for docking. *~a~sin use supporting DOD ships. Naval Station Capacity Analysis Data Call UIC: NO0245

21. List all government owned or leased tugs and pusher boats, and provide a description of each with their capabilities.

7 Tugs 1 Skimmer 6 YON 2 YO 8 YC CAP'4 BILITIES

YTB 'S - TO ASSIST UNITS OF THE PACIFIC FLEET UANUVER WITHIN THE CONFINES OF SAN DIEGO HARBOR, TO MOVE FLOATING ASSETS AS THE PORT SERVICES OFFICER MA Y DIRECT. SECONDARY MISSIONS INCLUDE: FIREFIGHTING AND RESCUE OPERATIONS.

YO-YOG, YON'S TO PRO VIDE INPORT FIJELING SER VICES

YC 'S TO PROVIDE LITERAGE SERVICES AS THE PORT SERVICES OFFICER UAY DIRECT. SKIMMER, TO REMOVE SPILLED OIL FROM THE INLAND WATERS. - 22. State the number of ship sets of CV or CVN mooring camels at your facility. State Change ~4644- the number of ship sets of SSN or SSBN camels at your facility. CPF MAY 94 NONE - Naval Station Capacity Analysis Data Call UIC: NO0245

PERSONNEL SUPPORT

23. Traininp Facilities

23.a. By Category Code Number (CCN), complete the following student throughput capacity table for all training facilities (adequate, substandard and inadequate) aboard the installation including tenant activities. Include all 17 1-xx, 179-xx CCN's and any other applicable CCN. Following the table, describe how the Student HoursIYr capacity is derived.

For example: in the category 171-10, a type of training facility is academic instruction classroom. If you have 10 classrooms with a capacity of 25 students per room, the design capacity would be 250. If these classrooms are available 8 hours a day for 300 days a year, the capacity in student hours per year would be 600,000.

Table 23.1

Parent CCN Type Training Total # Capacity Capacity UIC Facility NOTE l (PN)' NOTE 3 (Student HRSNR)'

N6 1690 17 1-20 Applied Instruction 248 3,565 5,23 1,760

N6 1690 17 1-25 Auditorium 2 265 508,800

N61690 171-35 Op Trainer Facility 16 447 403,680 NOTE 2

'Personnel Capacity is the total number of seats available for students in spaces used instruction based on the current configuration and use of the facilities.

Notes: 1. Total # is the number of classroom and laboratory facilities available for training. 2. Operational Trainer Facility capacity was based upon the class size that could be served by the facility, vice the size of the trainer. 3. Student HRSIYR derived by multiplying the capacity by the hours the facility is available in an 8-hour day (this figure ranged for 2 to 8 hours depending upon the type of training involved.) times 240 days per year. Naval Station Capacity Analysis Data Call UIC: NO0245

23.b. By facility Category Code Number (CCN), provide the number of hours per year of classroom time required for each course of instruction taught at fom~alsc:hools on your installation. Include all applicable 171- XX and 179-xx CCN's.

CCN: 171-25

Type of Training School Type of Training FY 1993 Requirements FY 2001 Requirements Facility A B C A B C

Applied Instruction FTC SPO 327 160 52,320 303 160 48,480

Applied Instruction FTC FO 996 43.55 43,376 1,204 42.91 51,664

Applied Instruction FTC FE / 47,209 17.17 819,352 97463 8.15 794,323 Applied Instruction FTC SPE '9128 201.46 1,838,927 9642 216.63 1088746

Change CCN: 171-35 N4644 - CPF MAY 94 Type of Training School Type of Fk' 1993 Requirements FY 2001 Requirements - Facility Training A B C A B C

Operational Trainer FTC SPE 324 229.44 339 390 241.9 94134

Operational Trainer FTC FE 26952 8.96 241490 40348 9.59 386,937

Vote: B= Average number of hours of instruction per student. Naval Station Capacity Analysis Data Call UIC: NO0245

CCN: 171-25

Type of Training School Type of Training FY 1993 Requirements FY 2001 Requirements Facility A B C A B C

Auditorium FTC FE 39830 12 477960 40000 12 480000

Note: 1. There are only a few courses regularly scheduled in the auditorium. The major use is for conferences, GMT, and courses sponsored by other activities.

2. Data provided is an approximation of average usage. The number of students in column A includes all users of the facility.

A = Students per year B = Number of hours each student spends in this training facility for each course C = A X B = Number of hours of instruction Naval Station Capacity Analysis Data Call UIC: NO0245

23.b. Assuming that the training facility is not constrained by operational funding (personnel support, increased overhead costs', etc.), with the present equipment, physical plant, etc., what additional capacity (in student hours) could be gained? Provide details and assumptions for all calculations.

If sufficient personnel and funding were available, an additional 8-hour training shift could be instituted to increase training capacity by 40%. This potential increase would be limited mainly to increased convenings of existing training courses as opposed to establishing new training courses. This scenario is highly unlikely in the current fiscal environment.

23.c. Assume all planned MILCON in Presidential Budget 1995 through FY 1997 and BRACON is completed as scheduled. What additional training capacity (in student hours per year) will be gained? Provide budgeted cost. and details of all additional capacity calculations.

FY-96 BRACON project P-023T will construct a training facility to house courses migrating to FLETRACEN San Diego as a result of BRAC 93 decision to close NTC San Diego. Additional training capacity: 190 PN capacity x 6 HR/day x 240 dayslyear = 273,600 Student HRSIYR.

23.d. What additional unfunded MILCON requirements could be added to increase training capacity? Provide the estimated cost and capacity gained and the basis of the values.

None programmed.

23.e. List and explain the limiting factors that further funding for personnel, equipment, facilities, etc. cannot overcome.

1. There is no available, compatible land-use, contiguous, and developable land for training facility expansion without changing the NAVSTA Master Plan and impacting the Quality of Life.

2. Most of the training courses involve extensive training equipment installation which remains in the training classrooms/laboratories rendering the facilities unusable for other training courses. This limits the additional training capacity calculated above to mainly increased numbers of convenings of the same training courses, as opposed to establishing new courses.

3. As a result of BRAC 93 decision to close NTC San Diego, significant numbers of training courses are migrating to FLETRACEN San Diego. Planning is underway to accommodate Naval Station Capacity Analysis Data Call UIC: NO0245 these courses by construction of a new training facility and housing the remaining courses within existing facilities. Recent capacity analysis indicates that no excess capacity is projected. These recent developments and planned growth limit ability to accurately forecase requirements beyond near future.

24.a. Provide data on the BOQs and BEQs assigned to your current plant account. The desired unit of measure for this capacity is people housed. Use CCN to differentiate between pay grades, i.e., El-E4, E5-E6, E7-E9, CWO-02, 03 and above.

Table 24.1 -

I Facility Type, Total TOTAL Adequate Substandard Inadequate Change BLDG # & NO. OF NO OF ~4644- CCN BEDS ROOMS CPF ' MAY 94 Beds Sq Ft Beds Sq Ft Beds Sq Ft BEQ B.3139 180 60 180 286 72111 BEQ B.3139 16 8 16 206 721 11 BEQ B.3139 2 2 2 173 721 11 BEQ B.3 142 270 90 270 296 72111 BEQ B.3142 65 65 65 147 721 12

BEQ 126 42 126 288 B.3 185A 72111 BEQ B.3185B 120 40 120 288 72111 BEQ B.3 185C 126 42 126 288 721 11 - Naval Station Capacity Analysis Data Call UIC: NO0245

Facility Type, Total TOTAL Adequate Substandard Inadequate BLDG # & NO. OF NO OF CCN BEDS ROOMS Becls Sq Ft Beds Sq Ft Beds Sq Ft

BEQ 60 60 60 258 B.3204A 721 13 BEQ B.3204B 56 56 56 258 721 13 BEQ B.3204C 48 4 8 48 258 721 13

BEQ 70 3 5 70 258 B.3205A 721 11

BEQ 24 24 24 258 B.3205A 721 12 BEQ B.3205B 120 60 120 258 72111 BEQ B.3205C 96 48 96 258 72111 BEQ B.3362 726 3 63 726 21 1 721 1 1 BEQ B.3362 136 136 136 21 1 721 12 BEQ B.3380 660 330 660 202 721 11 BEQ B.3380 226 226 226 202 721 12 i - Naval Station Capacity Analysis Data Call UIC: NO0245

Facility Type, Total TOTAL Adequate Substandard Inadequate BLDG # & NO. OF NO OF CCN BEDS ROOMS Beds Sq Ft Beds Sq Ft Beds Sq Ft

BEQ B.254 1 1 1 282 721 13 BEQ B.254 12 12 12 344 721 13 BEQ B.254 26 26 26 250 721 13 BEQ B.254 6 6 6 250 721 13 BEQ B.257 24 24 24 250 721 13 BEQ B.257 2 2 2 192 721 13 BEQ B.257 1 1 1 264 721 13 BEQ B.257 1 1 1 158 721 13 - Naval Station Capacity Analysis Data Call UIC: NO0245

Facility Type, Total TOTAL Adequate Substandard Inadequate BLDG # & NO. OF NO OF CCN BEDS ROOMS Beds Sq Ft Beds Sq Ft Beds Sq Ft

BOQ B.252 3 3 3 <250 724 1 1 BOQ B.252 6 6 6 >400 724 12 BOQ B.252 6 6 6 >250 724 12 BOQ B.3144 23 23 23 300 7241 1 BOQ B.3150 47 47 47 300 7241 1

BOQ 36 36 36 268 B.3203A 7241 1

BOQ 36 36 36 268 B.3203B 7241 1

BOQ 34 34 3 4 268 B.3203C 7241 1

- BOQ B.3203D 36 36 3 6 268 7241 1 Naval Station Capacity Analysis Data Call UIC: NO0245

24.b. In accordance with NAVFACINST 1 1010.44E, an inadequate facility cannot be made adequate for its present use through "economically justifiable means". For all the categories above where inadequate facilities are identified provide the following information: NONE A. FACILITY TYPE/CODE: B. WHAT MAKES IT INADEQUATE? C. WHAT USE IS BEING MADE OF THE FACILITY? D. WHAT IS THE COST TO UPGRADE THE FACILITY TO SUBSTANDARD? E. WHAT OTHER USE COULD BE MADE OF THE FACILITY AND AT WHAT COST? F. CURRENT IMPROVEMENT PLANS AND PROGRAMMED FUNDING: G. HAS THIS FACILITY CONDITION RESULTED IN C3 OR C4 DESIGNATION ON YOUR BASEREP?

24.c. Provide data on the BOQs and BEQs projected to be assigned to your plant account in FY 1997. The desired unit of measure for this capacity is people housed. Use CCN to differentiate between pay grades, i.e., El -E4, E5-E6, E7-E9, CWO-02, 03 and above.

Table 24.2

Facility Type, TotaI TOTAL Adequate Substandard Inadequate BLDG3 & NO OF NO OF CCN BEDS ROOMS Beds Sq Ft Beds Sq Ft Beds Sq Ft NONE

24.d. In accordance with NAVFACINST 11010.44E, an inadequate facility cannot be made adequate for its present use through "economically justifiable means". For all the categories above where inadequate facilities are identified provide the following information:

NONE

A. FACILITY TYPE/CODE: B. WHAT MAKES IT INADEQUATE? C. WHAT USE IS BEING MADE OF THE FACILITY? D. WHAT IS THE COST TO UPGRADE THE FACILITY TO SUBSTANDARD? E. WHAT OTHER USE COULD BE MADE OF THE FACILITY AND AT WHAT COST? F. CURRENT IMPROVEMENT PLANS AND PROGRAMMED FUNDING: G. HAS THIS FACILITY CONDITION RESULTED IN C3 OR C4 DESIGNATION ON YOUR BASEREP? Naval Station Capacity Analysis Data Call UIC: NO0245

25.a. Provide data on the messing facilities assigned to your current plant account. Table 25.1

Facility Type, TOTAL Adequate Substandard Inadequate AVG # BLDG # & CCN SQ. FT . NOON Seats Sq Ft Seats Sq Ft Seats Sq Ft MEALS SERVED Mess Hall 33,060 2,818 33,060 650 * B. 3202 722-10 1,100 **

NOTE: * 650 is normal average without ships' crews. * * 1,100 is normal plus ships crews in port for overhaul, etc.

25.b. In accordance with NAVFACINST 11010.44E, an inadequate facility cannot be made adequate for its present use through "econom.ically justifiable means". For all the categories above where inadequate facilities are identified provide the following information:

NONE

A. FACILITY TYPEICODE: B. WHAT MAKES IT INADEQUATE? C. WHAT USE IS BEING MADE OF THE FACILITY? D. WHAT IS THE COST TO UPGRADE THE FACILITY TO SUBSTANDARD? E. WHAT OTHER USE COULD BE MADE OF THE FACILITY AND AT WHAT COST? F. CURRENT IMPROVEMENT PLANS AND PROGRAMMED FUNDING: G. HAS THIS FACILITY CONDITION RESULTED IN C3 OR C4 DESIGNATION ON YOUR BASEREP? Naval Station Capacity Analysis Data Call UIC: NO0245

25.c. Provide data on the messing facilities projected to be assigned to your plant account in FY 1997. Table 25.2

Facility Type, TOTAL Adequate Substandard Inadequate AVG NUM BLDG # CCN SQ FT NOON Seats Sq Ft Seats Sq Ft Seats Sq Ft MEALS SERVED NONE

25.d. In accordance with NAVFACINST 11010.44E, an inadequate facility cannot be made adequate for its present use through "economically justifiable means". For all the categories above where inadequate facilities are identified provide the following information:

NONE

A. FACILITY TYPEKODE: B. WHAT MAKES IT INADEQUATE? C. WHAT USE IS BEING MADE OF THE FACILITY? D. WHAT IS THE COST TO UPGRADE THE FACILITY TO SUBSTANDARD? E. WHAT OTHER USE COULD BE MADE OF THE FACILITY AND AT WHAT COST? F. CURRENT IMPROVEMENT PLANS AND PROGRAMMED FUNDING: G. HAS THIS FACILITY CONDITION IESULTED IN C3 OR C4 DESIGNATION ON YOUR BASEREP? Naval Station Capacity Analysis Data Call UIC: NO0245

26. For military married family housing assigned to your plant account provide the following information: Table 26.1

Type of Quarters Number Total number Number Number Number of of units Adequate Substandard Inadequate Bedrooms

Officer 4+ 194 194 Officer 3 34 1 34 1 Officer 1 or 2 24 24 - Enlisted 4+ 1,605 1,605 Enlisted 3 2,853 2,853 Enlisted 1 or 2 2,648 2,648 Mobile Homes 0 0 Mobile Home lots 108 108 - In accordance with NAVFACINST 11010.44E, an inadequate facility cannot be made adequate for its present use through "economically justifiable means". For all the categories above where inadequate facilities are identified describe why the housing is inadequate; indicate how the housing is being used and list other possible uses; and specify the costs to remove the deficiencies that make it inadequate. Indicate current plans to remove these deficiencies and the amount of any programmed funds.

27. For personnel assigned to your base and tenant activities who live in government quarters other than yours, indicate the plant account holder UIC for their quarters.

N63387 Total inventory on Navy Public Works Center San Diego plant account. Only two quarters are located on-board Naval Station San Diego - both are 4 bedroom officer quarters. Naval Station Capacity Analysis Data Call UIC: NO0245

28. Provide the following information on base infrastructure capacity and load. Table 28.1

On Base Off base long Normal Steady Peak Demand Capacity term contract State Load Electrical SuppIy 100 MVA 70 MVA 40 MVA 45 MVA (KWH) Natural Gas (CFH) NONE NONE NONE NONE Sewage (GPD) 120 x lo6 WIA 2 x lo6 6 x lo6 Potable Water (GPD) 60 x 1O6 NIA 2 x lo6 6 x lo6 Steam (PSI & lbm/Hr) 150/120,000 NIA 125160,000 125190,000 Long Term Parking 80 NIA 75 - 80 80 Short Term Parking 18,880 NIA 18,880 18,880 Naval Station Capacity Analysis Data Call UIC: NO0245

29. Provide the maintenance, repair, and equipment expenditure data indicated in the following table for FYs 1985 - 1997 Table 29.1 Activity: UIC:

Fiscal Year MRP ($) ' CPV ($) ACE ($) FY 1985 5,086,900 UNKNOWN UNKNOWN FY 1986 4,335,733 41 7,087,230 UNKNOWN FY 1987 4,942,000 452,385,387 UNKNOWN FY 1988 5,136,000 487,806,438 91,186 FY 1989 7,759,000 507,797,180 1,015,716 FY 1990 7,420,678 564,495,082 368,926 FYI991 10,428,000 572,577,189 648,744 FY 1992 10,926,000 584,986,623 579,078 FY 1993 11,933,000 612,789,202 1,151,172

FY 1994 18,250,000 id$ '" 6 12,789,202 1,177,649 FY 1995 21,834,000 6 12,789,20 1,2 10,624 FY 1996 21,385,000 612,789,202 1,245,732 FY 1997 2 1,547,000 6 12,789,202 1,283,104

' MRP: Maintenance of Real Property Dollars is a budgetary term used to gather the expenses or budget requirements for facility work including recurring maintenance, major repairs, and minor construction (non-MILCON). It is the amount of funds spent on or budgeted for maintenance and repair of real property assets to maintain the facility in satisfactory operating condition. CPV: Current Plant Value of Class 2 Real Property is the hypothetical dollar amount to replace a Class 2 facility in kind with today's dollars. Example: the cost today to replace a wood frame barracks with a wood frame barracks. ACE: Acauisition Cost of Equiument is the total cumulative acquisition cost of all "personal Property" equipment which includes the cost of installed equipment directly related to mission execution, such as lab test equipment. Class 2 installed capital equipment that is an integral part of the facility will not be reported as ACE. Naval Station Capacity Analysis Data Call UIC: NO0245

30. Real Estate Resources. Identify in the table below the real estate resources which have the potential to facilitate future development and for which you are the plant account holder or into which, though a tenant, your activity could reasonably expect to expand. Complete a separate table for each individual site, i.e., main base, outlying airfields, special off-site areas, etc. The unit of measure is acres. Developed area is defined as land currently with buildings, roads, and utilities where further development is not possible without demolition of existing improvements. Include in "Restricted" areas that are restricted for future development due to environmental constraints (e.g. wetlands, landfills, archaeological sites), operational restrictions (e.g. ESQD arcs, HERO, HERP, HERF, AICUZ, ranges) or cultural resources restrictions. Identify the reason for the restriction when providing the acreage in the table. Specify any entry in "Other" (e.g. submerged lands). Table 30.1: Real Estate Resources Site Location: NAVAL STATION SAN DIEGO

I 11 Change Ileveloped Available for Development ~4644- Land Use Total Acres Acreage MAY 94

Restricted Unrestricted !I Maintenance 145.84 117.06 E - 28.78 1 NONE I I Operational 45.57

Training 40.15 1 0 - 4.55 1 NONE

Supply & Storage 1 133.09 121.22 E - 11.87 NONE Admin 21.64 21.64 1 NONE 1 NONE I I Housing 1 65.57 3.44 1 E-62.13 I NONE 11 I Recreational 1 99.62 59.21 E - 40.41 NONE Navy Naval Station Capacity Analysis Data Call UIC: NO0245

Developed Available for Development Land Use Total Acres Acreage

Restricted Unrestricted Navy Agricultural NIA N/A N/A N/A Outlease Program HuntingIFishing N/A NL4 N/A N/A Programs Other (I) 477.97 285.55 E - 189.64 2.78

Total: 1,029.45 669.03 357.64 2.78

NOTE: E - ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS 0 - OPERATIONAL RESTRICTIONS (1) OTHER = LOGISTIC SUPPORT, MEDICAL, COMMUNITY/PERSONNEL SUPPOR T/SER VICES, COMMUNITY RETAIL, UTILITIES, PARKING/LOADOUT AREAS.

Change N4644- CPF -MAY 94 Naval Station Capacity Analysis Data Call UIC: NO0245

Table 30.1: Heal Estate Resources

Site Location: MAGNETIC SILENCING FACILITY DEPERMING & DEGAUSING

Developed Available for Development Change Land Use Total Acres Acreage ~4644- CPF MAY 94 111

Restricted Unrestricted

Maintenance N/A MIA N/A NI'A Operational 20.25 0.09 0 - 1.08 8.27 E - 10.81 Training N/A NI'A N/A N/A R&D N/A NI'A N/A N/A Supply & Storage 1.15 NONE NONE 1.15 Admin N/A N/A N/A N/A Housing N/A N/A N/A N/A Recreational N/A M/A N/A N/A Navy Forestry N/A NA N/A N/A Program

Navy Agricultural N/A NL4 N/A N/A Outlease Program

HuntingKishing NIA N/A N/A N/A Programs

Other N/A NIX N/A N/A

Total : 21.40 0.09 11.81 9.42 Note: E - ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS 0 - OPERATIONAL RESTRICTIONS DEPERMING - 19.74 ACRES DEGAUSING - 1.66 ACRES = 21.40 ACRES Naval Station Capacity Analysis Data Call UIC: NO0245

Table 30.1 : Real Estate Resources Site Location: MISSION GORGE RECREATION CENTER A

Developed Available for Development Change Land Use Total Acres Acreage ~4644- CPF MAY 94 I

Restricted Unrestricted

Maintenance N/A MA N/A N/A Operational N/A MIA N/A N/A Training N/A N//A N/A N/A R&D N/A N/'A N/A N/A Supply & Storage 6.94 6.94 NONE NONE Admin 0.77 0.'77 NONE NONE Housing N/A N/A N/A N/A Recreational 440.45 3 12.89 E - 127.56 NONE Navy Forestry N/ A NL4 N/A N/A Program

Navy Agricultural N/A NL4 N/A N/A Outlease Program

Hunting/Fishing N/A N/'d N/A N/A Programs

Other N/A N/'f N/A N/A

Total: 448.16 320.60 127.56 NONE Note: E - ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS Naval Station Capacity Analysis Data Call UIC: NO0245

Weapons and Munitions Capacity

31. Does your activity perform any stowage or maintenance on any of the following ordnance commodities types: (YIN) YES

(If YES, answer the question 3 1.a through 3 1 .d; if NO skip to question 32) ORDNANCE COMMODITY TYPES Mines Expendables LOE: Rockets Torpedoes INERT LOE: Bombs Air Launched Threat CAD SPADS LOE: Gun Ammo (20mm-16" Surface Launched Threat Strategic Nuclear LOE: Small Arms (up to 50 cal) Other Threat Tactical Nuclear LOE: PyroIDemo Grenades/Mortars/Projectiles

31. Ordnance Stowage and Support

31.a Provide present and predicted inventories (coordinate with inventory control manager) and maximum rated capability of all stowage facilities at each weapons storage location controlled by this activity. In predicting the out year facility utilization, distribute overall ordnance compliment to the most likely configuration. The maximum rated capability is also an out year projection taking into account any known or programmed upgrades that may increase current stowage capacity. When listing stowage facilities, group by location, i.e. main base, outlying field, special area. Naval Station Capacity Analysis Data Call UIC: NO0245 Naval Station Capacity Analysis Data Call UIC: NO0245

31.b For each Stowage facility identified in question 31.a above, identify the type of facility (specify if "igloo", "box", etc.). Identify the type of ordnance commodity (from the list above) which are currently stowed in that facility and all other ordnance types which, given existing restrictions, could be physically accommodated in that stowage facility. Specify below if such additional accommodation would require a modification of the facility (e.g. enhanced environmental controls, ESQD waiver).

Identify the reason(s) for which this ordnance is stored at your facility from the following list: own activity use (training); own activity use (operational stock); Receipt/Segregationl StowageAssue (RSSI); transhipment/awaiting issue; deep stow (war reserve); deep stow (awaiting Demil); other. Explain each "other" entry in the space provided, including ordnance stowed which is not a DON asset.

Table 3 1.2: Total Facilitv Ordnance Stowage Summarv

Currently Reason for Commodity Stowed Stowage at your Type@) Facility Commodity Activity Which Can Be NumberIType TYP~(~) Stowed B. 95 Armory LOE Small Arms Security Small Arms Concrete Reinforced LOE Pyro Security Pyros Building LOE Grenades Security Grenades MWD Training Security (Waiver) CNO 1.1 Security NSSD 1-86 B . 17 Repair Shop LOE Pyro Liferaft Repair Pyros Only Ready Service Lockers B. 3487 MWD None Train Military 16.0 NEW 1.1 Bunker Earthen Working Dogs When Approved Bermed Ready Service Locker

Additional comments: Naval Station Capacity Analysis Data Call UIC: NO0245

31.c Identify the rated category, rated NEW and status of ESQD arc for each stowage facility listed above. Table 31.3: Facility Rated Status

Hazard ESQD Arc Rating Rated , (1.1- NEW Established Waiver 1 Waiver 1.4) (Y / N) i (Y / N) j Expiration I I Date

B. 95 Armory 1.3 Unlimit. Yes 100' No N/A 1.1 20 # No Yes March 1995 +B. 17 Rpr Shop 1.4 300 # Yes 100' No N/A 11 B. 3487 MWD 1.1 20 # Yes 1 Bunker

Change N4644- CPF -MAY 94 Naval Station Capacity Analysis Data Call UIC: NO0245

31.d Identify any restrictions which prevent maximum utilization of your facilities. If restrictions are based on facility conditions, specify reason, the cost to correct the deficiency, and identify any programmed projects that will correct the deficiency andtor increase your capability.

Civilian workers on ships in SRA impact ESQD arcs. Decommissioning ships especially. When this happens we have to either move the civilians or move the ships desiring to handle explosives.

31.e Identify if your activity performs any of the following functions on any of the ordnance commodities previously listed. Technical support includes planning, financial, administrative, process engineering and SOP support. Within each related function identify each ordnance commodity type for which you provide these services and the total Direct Labor Man Hours (DLMHs) expended (FY 1994); identify only those DLMHs expended by personnel under your command.

Table 3 1.5: Related Ordnance Support

Performed? Type of Commodity - DLMHs Related Functions (Y N) Maintenance No (specify level) Testing No Manufacturing No Outload No Technical Support No

32.Do you have the ability to operate and maintain naval aircraft? (YN) NO (If YES, answer questions 33 through 48: if NO data call is complete.) BRAC-95 CERTIFICATION DATA CALL SIX

NAVSTA SAN DIEGO

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. MAJOR CLAIMANT LEVEL

J. R. FITZGERALD NAME (Please type or print) -Commander In Chief /71yaas/ Title (Acting) Date

-U. S. Pacific Fleet Activity

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

DEPUTY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS (LOGISTICS) DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF (INSTA

?.w. DEW11309 NAME (Please type or print)

WcbvL. Title BRAC 95 DATA CALL SIX

NAVAL STATION SAN DIEGO I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

TYPE COMMANDER LEVEL

DATE : COMMANDER, NAVAL SURFACE FORCE, U.S. PACIFIC FLEET

DATE : FORCE FACILITIES PLANNER COMMANDER, NAVAL SURFACE FORCE, U.S. PACIFIC FLEET BRAC-95 DATi4 CALL NUMBER SIX CERTIFICATION

Reference: SECNAVNOTE 11000 of 08 December 1993

In accordance with policy set forth by the Secretary of the Navy, personnel of the Department of the Navy, uniformed and civilian, who provide information for use in the BRAC-95 process are required to provide a signed certification that states "I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief."

The signing of this certification constitutes a representation that the certifying official has reviewed the information and either (1) personally vouches for its accuracy and completeness or (2) has possession of, and is relying upon, a certification executed by a competent subordinate.

Each individual in your activity generating information for the BRAC-95 process must certify that information. Enclosure (1) is provided for individual certifications and may be duplicated as necessary. You are dimted to maintain those certifications at your activity for audit purposes. For purposes of this certification sheet, the commander of the activity will begin the certification process and each reporting senior in the Chain of Command reviewing the information will also sign this certification sheet. This sheet must remain attached to this package and be forwarded up the Chain of Command. Copies must be retained by each level in the Chain of Command for audit purposes.

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

ACTIVITY COMMANDER

M. K. COLLINS, CAPTAIN, USN NAME (Please type or print) Signature

COMMANDING OFmCER Title Date /

NAVAL STATION SAN DIEGO, CA. Activity

Enclosure (1) ENVIR0NME:NTAL DATA CALL: NAVSTA SAN DIEGO DATA CALL TO BE SUBMITTED TO ALL NAVY/MARINE CORPS HOST ACTIVITIES

20 APRIL 1994 BRAC 1995 ENVIRONMENTAL DATA CALL: All NavylMarine Corps Host Ativities INDEX Section Paqe GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS ...... ENDANGEREDITHREATENED SPECIES AND BIOLOGICAL HABITAT WETLANDS ...... CULTURAL RESOURCES ...... ENVIRONMENTAL FACILITIES ...... AIRPOLLUTION ...... ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE ...... INSTALLATION RESTORATION ...... LAND/AIR/WATER USE ...... mp-UP ...... UIC: NO0245 ENVIRONMENTAL DATA CALL Responses to the following questions provide data that will allow an assessment of the potential environmental impact associated with the closure or realignment of a Navy shore activity. This criterion consists of: EndangeredIThreatened Species and Biological Habitat Wetlands Cultural Resources Environmental Facilities Air Pollution Environmental Compliance Installation Restoration Land/Air/Water Use

As partbase of theloading answers to these questions, a source citation , 1%:913...... ;$base-wide. . . ,., ...... Endangered Species letter f US'F~S,' Master Plan, ...... I...... PA/SI # etc."" .".'.'.'."""'.' ) must be included .""""'y.. . ..I...... : . ...'.,.,...... Permit ion t :;:I:::i...... :::.....: ..... is probable that, at s'ome point in the future, you will be asked to provide additional information detailing specifics of individual characteristics. In anticipation of this request, supporting documentation (e.g., maps, reports, letters, etc.) regarding answers to these questions should be retained. Information needed to answer these questions is available from the cognizant EFD Planning and Real Estate Di.visions, and Environment, Safety, and Health Divisions; and from the activity Public Works Department, and activity Health Monitoring and Safety Offices. For purposes of the questions associated with land use at your base is defined as land (acreage owned, withdrawn, leased, and controlled through easements); air (space controlled through agreements with the FAA, e.g., MOAs); and water (navigation channels and waters along a base shoreline) under the control of the Navy. TENANT ACTIVITIES:

Tenants residing on main complex (shore commands)

- -

Tclra Canamd Nam UIC

f=&fi"uy L4-n=l N00242

F&nl FiDDprmra NWX2

Flru&hrhrtrialSIpplyCavr NO0244

Nanl Tniuiq Coacr N-7

Navy Env. & Rev. Mod. Unit 5 NOS46A UIC: NO0245 Tolra Cammai NUW UC

CNSP DS NSC OPS N41608

COMPHIBGRU THREE N52739

COMPHIBRON I N55291

COMPHIBRON 3 N55281

COMPHIBRON 5 NU269

COMPHIBRON 7 NUZW

COMPHIBRON 7 DET NEW N49996

COMPHIBRON 9 (will DECOM FY99 N46698

COMPHIBRON 9 DES NEW (DECOM FYW N49997

COMCRUDESGRU ONE N5.5501

COMCRUDESGRU THREE N55780

COMCRUDESGRU FIVE (DECOM FYW NUM

COMDESRON 5 NO1 14A

COMDESRON 7 NO1 16.4

COMWRON 13 NOlM

COMDESRON 13 SHORE DmCOUP N42 1 44

COMDESRON 13 NEUDU COMP N41966

COMDESRON I7 (DECOM FY95) NOl26A ? - Tars CardNP~. UIC

COMDESRON 21 NO l MA

COMDESRON 23 N013U

COMDESRON 33 N5mS

COMDESRON 33 NEUDU COMP N41331

COMDESRON 33 SHORE DmCOMP N42144

EODMU 7 (NRF) N82630

CNSP RSGU PMP COMPONENT * N4724l -p-l ady Tenants residing on main complex (homeported units.)

USS FREDRICK (note: will DECOM 14 Jul 95)

5 UIC: NO0245

Tenants residing in Special Areas (Special Areas are defined as real estate owned by host command not contiguous with main complex; e.g. outlying fields).

Tenant Comnand Name Location Magnetic Silencing Note: These figures are Facility included in Item 12. Tenant Activity List UIC: NO0245

1. ENDANGERED/THREATENED SPECIES AND BIOLOGICAL HABITAT la. For federal or state listed endangered, threatened, or category 1 plant and/or animal species on your base, complete the following table. Critical/sensitive habitats for these species are designated by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). A species is present on your base if some part of its life-cycle occurs on Navy controlled property (e.g., nesting, feeding, loafing). Important Habitat refers to that number of acres of habitat that is important to some life cycle stage of the threatened/endangered species that is not formally designated.

DesignationFederal/ Critical / Importa SPECIES (Threatened State Designated nt (plant or animal) / Habitat Habitat Endangered) (Acres) (acres) Gravia inner - common loon Californi State 0 0 a Special Concern

Palecanus occidentalis - Brown Endangere Federa 3 0 pelican d 1 Falco peregrinum - Peregrine Endngered Federa 3 0 Falcon 1 Sterna antillrum brownii - Endangere Federa 3 0 California Lest Tern d 1 Sterna eleganss - Elegant Tern Fed. Cat. Federa 0 0 2 Cal 1 Spec Concern

- - - - ppp Phalacrocorax avritus - Double Californi State 0 0 Crested Cormorant a special concern Pandion haliaetus -Osprey Californi State 0 0 a Special Concern Y UIC: NO0245

( Larus ~alifornicus- California Concern

Californi State 0 0 a Special Concern

Chanadrius alexandrinus nivosus - rhreatene Federa 3 0 Western Snowy Plove d 1 Source Citation: 1994 Environments: Assessment Dredging at Pier 3, NAVSTA San Diego. lb. Have your base operations or development plans been YES constrained due to: - USFWS or National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)? - State required modifications or constraints? If so, identify below the impact of the constraints including any restrictions on land use. Underwater construction not allowed during least tern nesting season. Are there any requirements resulting from species not YES residing on base, but which migrate or are present nearby? If so, summarize the impact of such constraints. Least terns forage in waters off Naval Station San Diego land at Point Loma. Other protected migratory birds nest on base and loaf and forage in waters near base property. Memorandum of Understanding created with US Fish & Wildlife concerning the California least tern. lc. If the area of the habitat and the associated species have not been identified on base maps provided in Data Call 1, submit this information on an updated version of Data Call 1 map. ld. ave any efforts been made to relocate any species NO conduct any mitigation with regards to critical abitats or endangeredlthreatened species? Explain what as been done and why. UIC: NO0245

le. Will any state or local laws and/or regulations applying YES to endangered/threatened species which have been enacted or promulgated but not yet effected, constrain base operations or development plans beyond those already identified? Explain. Project to designate the Point Loma complex critical habitat areas as an Ecological Reserve Area is in progress. This project will prevent any construction in critical habitat ares, like the 2-3 acre beach area at Magnetic silencing Facility where the California Lest Tern forages and loafs. - 2- WETLANDS Note: Jurisdictional wetlands are those areas that meet the wetland definitional criteria detailed in the Corps of Engineers (COE) Wetland Delineation Manual, 1987, Technical Report Y-87-1, U.S. Army Engineer Waterway Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS or officially adapted state definitions.

Does your base possess federal jurisdictional wetlands? YES

Has a wetlands survey in accordance with established NO standards been conducted for your base? - When was the survey conducted or when will it be Dec 95 conducted? 1 1 What percent of the base has been surveyed? 0 What is the total acreage of jurisdictional wetlands 14 present on your base? acres

Source Citation: Natural Resources Plan for Admiral Baker Field

2b. If the area of the wetlands has not been identified on base maps provided in Data Call 1, submit this on an updated version of Data Call 1 map.

2c. Has the EPA, COE or a state wetland regulatory agency required you to modify or constrain base operations or development plans in any way in order to accommodate a iurisdictional wetland?- - YES If YES, summarize the reshlts of such modifications or constraints. UIC: NO0245 Underwater construction not allowed during least tern nesting season.

3. CULTURAL RESOURCES

3a. Has a survey been conducted to determine historic YES sites, structures, districts or archaeological resources which are listed, or determined eligible for listing, on the National Register of Historic Places? If so, list the sites below. Buildings at NAVSTA which are potentially eligible for nomination to the National Register of Historic Places :

17 72 151 36 74 152 37 75 153 55 76 154 56 77 210 57 78 249 58 96 250 61 116 277 62 127 297 71 150 357 3320

DEGAUSSING STATION/DEPERMING FACILITY, POINT LOMA

PREHISTORIC SITES NAVAL STATION (area west of 32nd Street and south of Main Street)

NAVAL RECREATION CENTER, ADMIRAL BAKER FIELD CA-SDi-12,088 Located near the main golf facilities (Newly discovered) CA-SDi-12,089 Located near the main golf facilities (Newly discovered) CA-SDi-11,723 (SDM-W-4,2339) Located along the northeastern edge of the Naval ~ecreationCenter CA-SDi-6,660 (SDM-W-4,444) Located along the northeastern edge of the Naval Recreation Center Has the President's Advisory Council on Historic NO preservation or the cognizant State Historic Preservation Officer required you to mitigate or constrain base operations or development plans in any way in order to accommodate a ~ational~egister cultural resource? If YES, list the results of such modifications or constraints below. -

Are there any on base areas identified as sacred NO areas or burial sites by Native Americans or others? List below.

4. ENVIRONMENTAL FACILITIES Notes: If your facility is permitted for less than maximum capacity, state the maximum capacity and explain below the associated table why it is not permitted for maximum capacity. Under I1Permit Statuslt state when the permit expires, and whether the facility is operating under a waiver. For permit violations, limit the list to the last 5 years.

Does your base have an operating landfill? . . . . . NO ID/Location of Permitted Maximum contents' Permit Landfill Capacity Capacit Status ( CYD 1 Y ( CYD 1 TOTAL Remainin Q ONE I Contents (e.g. building demolition, asbestos, sanitary debris, etc) Are there any current or programmed projects to correct deficiencies or improve the facility.

4b. If there are any non-Navy users of the landfill, describe the user and conditions/agreements. NOT APPLICABLE UIC: NO0245 4c. Does your base have any disposal, recycling, or incineration YES facilities for solid waste?

ppI - - FacilityfType ~ermittedAve Daily Maximum Permit Comments of Operation I Capacity Throughpu Capacity Status t

RECYCLING NOT 16 TONS 120 TONS NONE YET THE EXISTING PERMITTED DAILY RECYCLING CENTER STARTED AS A FEASIBILITY STUDY IN 1990 TO DETERMINE FACILITY REQUIREMENTS. IT IS CURRENTLY UNDER STAFFED NOT CAPABLE OF MEETING MAXIMUM CAPACITY OR PERMIT REQUIREMENTS ,ist any permi : violations and projectg to correct deficiencies o. improve the facility.

Does your base own/operate a Domestic Wastewater NO Treatment Plant (WWTP) ? I I I I ID/Location Permitted Average Maximum Permit Level of of WWTP Capacity Daily Capacity Status Treatment Discharge /Year Rate Built NONE List permit violations and discuss any projects to correct deficiencies.

4e. If you do not have a domestic WWTP, describe the average Change discharge rate of your base to the local sanitary sewer 465-CPF authority, discharge limits set by the sanitary sewer JUY 94 authority (flow and pollutants) and whether the base is in - compliance with their permit. Discuss recurring discharge violations:

Discharge limits: pH 5.0-11.0 Copper 4.5 mg/1 Flash Point >I40 F Lead 0.6 mg/l Grease & Oil 500 mg/l Mercury UIC: NO0245

Dissolved sulfides 1.0 mg/l Nickel

Cyanide 1.9 mg/l Selenium Antimony 2.0 mg/l Si 1ver Arsenic 2.0 mg/l Thallium

Beryl 1i um 2.0 mg/l Zinc

Cadmi um 1.2 mg/l Chromium 7.0 mg/l Pesticides C PCBs 0.04mg/l Phenolic Compounds 25.0 mg/l Compliance Status: NAVSTA San Diego is currently in compliance with its Industrial User Discharge Permit. Recurring violations: NAVSTA experience difficulty meeting discharge limits for Chromium, Copper, Lead, Silver, and Zinc in 1991 & 1992 and received several notices of violation from the city of San Diego. Most of the discharges causing the violations were traced and eliminated and the awareness raised. The station has been in compliance with discharge requirements since the 4th quarter of 1992.

Does your base operate an Industrial Waste Treatment NO Plant (IWTP)? I I I I ID/Location of 1 Type of / Permitted 1 Ave Daily / Maximum I Permit Treatment Capacity Discharge Capacity Status Rate ONE I List any permit violations and projects to correct deficiencies or improve the facility.

4g. Are there other waste treatment flows not accounted for Change in the previous tables? Estimate capacity and describe the 46s-CPF system. JUY 94 Yes - System NO. of Units Capacity Oil Water seperators 8 1000-13,750 UIC: NO0245 Gal Silver Recovery Units 10 2-25 Gal Neutralization Processes Tanks 2 1000-3200 Gal Metal Scrap Bin 1 Dumpster Aerosol Can Puncturing Device 1 55 Gal Drum

Does your base operate drinking Water Treatment NO Plants (WTP)? I I I ID/Location 1 Operating (GPD) 1 Method of 1 ~aximumI permit , Treatment Capacity status Permitted Daily Capacity Rate NONE 7List permit violations and projects/actions to correct deficiencies or improve the facility. 4i. If you do not operate a WTP, what is the source of the base potable water supply. State terms and limits on capacity in the agreementjcontract, if applicable. City of San Diego

Does the presence of contaminants or lack of supply NO of water constrain base operations. Explain.

Other than those described above does your base YES hold any NPDES or stormwater permits? If YES, describe permit conditions. L The design capacity limitation of the recycling center is lOOuC tons/week of solid waste that would otherwise be sent to a landfill. This capacity is based on an 8 hour work day and a 5 day work week. The capacity could be increased by additional working hours and days to meet a capacity of 140 tons/week.

40. Do capacity limitations on any of the facilities discussed in question 4 pose a present or future limitation on base operations? Explain. The design capacity limitation of the recycling center is 100 tons/week of solid waste that would otherwise be sent to a landfill. The purpose of the recycling center is to divert 258 of the station's solid waste by weight from being sent to a landfill by 1995 and 50% by 2000. This is .required under AB939. If the 50% requirement is greater than 100 tons/week it may pose a limita-tion on base operations. This may be affected by any increase in personnel and operations due to BRAC.

5. AIR POLLUTION

What is the name of the Air Quality Control Areas (AQCAs) in which the base is located? San Diego ~irPollution Control District (SD APCD) Is the installation or any of its OLFs or non-contiguous base properties located in different AQCAs? NO. List site, location and name of AQCA.

5b. For each parcel in a separate AQCA fill in the following table. Identify with and "X" whether the status of each regulated pollutant is: attainment/nonattainment/maintenance. For those areas which are in non-attainment, state whether they are: ~arginal,Moderate, Serious, Severe, or Extreme. State target attainment year.

Site: San Dieqo APCD AQCA: NA Pollutant Attainment Non- Maint Target Coyents Attainmen enanc t e - - lk&*& CO 4,4~AMOD, -2 &d -- Ozone - X - 11/15/05 If l'(1 619 4 \ ( SEVERE) 11/15/99 reclassi fied to serious PM- 10 - - - SO3 X - - - - UIC: NO0245

If NO, why not and provide explanation of plan to achieve permitted status. PWC holds the only NPDES permit at this base. / The permit is for the Graving Dock only. NAVSTA 1 applied for an NPDES permit in 1989 however the / application was incomplete and the Regional Watqr Board did not grant a permit. In 1993 a contrpct was awarded to Law & Craudall to survey the base for point source discharges and to prepare a complete NPDES application. The surveying was recently completed. A draft report and , application has been prepared. it is currently under review. We expect that the ~oard.'will approve application once finalized. ,'

41. YES/NO Does your base have bilge water discharge problem? YES

DO you have a bilge water tredtment facility? NO / Explain: / - State requirements call the removal of bilgewater udonuts" Change by 1996. As a resu t, a method must be developed to treat the 46s-CPF buldgewater. Plaks are underway to build a treatment JUW 94 facility with MILCONS,@~~O,PI86 & P244. NFESC treatment units will be used in'the interim. However, means for - transporting the bizeewater to the treatment units are presently still in the devel$ment stage. ,' UIC: NO0245

In. Will any state or local laws and/or regulations applying NO to Environmental Facilities, which have been enacted or promulgated but not yet effected, constrain base operations or development plans beyond those already identified? Explain.

In. What expansion capacity is possible with these Environmental Facilities? Will any expansions/upgrades as a result of BRACON or projects programmed through the Presidents budget through FY1997 result in additional capacity? Explain. The design capacity limitation of the recycling center is 100 tons/week of solid waste that would otherwise be sent to a landfill. This capacity is based on an 8 hour work day and a 5 day work week. The capacity could be increased by additional working hours and days to meet a capacity of 140 tons/week.

40. Do capacity limitations on any of the facilities discussed in question 4 pose a present or future limitation on base operations? Explain. The design capacity limitation of the recycling center is 100 tonslweek of solid waste that would otherwise be sent to a landfill. The purpose of the recycling center is to divert 25% of the station's solid waste by weight from being sent to a landfill by 1995 and 50% by 2000. This is required under AB939. If the 50% requirement is greater than 100 tons/week it may pose a limitation on base operations. This may be affected by any increase in personnel and operations due to BRAC .

5. AIR POLLUTION Sa. What is the name of the Air Quality Control Areas (AQCAs) in which the base is located? San Diego Air Pollution Control District (SD APCD) Is the installation or any of its OLFs or non-contiguous base properties located in different AQCAs? NO. List site, location and name of AQCA.

5b. For each parcel in a separate AQCA fill in the following table. Identify with and "XIt whether the status of each regulated pollutant is: attainment/nonattainment/maintenance. For those areas which are in non-attainment, state whether they are: Marginal, Moderate, Serious, Severe, or Extreme. State target attainment year. Site: San Dieao APCD

Based on national standard for Non-Attainment areas or SIP for Maintenance areas. Indicate if attainment is dependent upon BRACON, MILCON or Special Projects. Also indicate if the project is currently programmed within the Presidents FYI997 budget.

5c. For your base, identify the baseline level of emissions, established in accordance with the Clean Air Act. Baseline information is assumed to be 1990 data or other year as specified. Determine the total level of emissions (tons/yr) for CO, NOx, VOC, PMlO for the general sources listed. For all data provide a list of the sources and show vour calculations. Use known emissions data, or emissions derived from use of state methodologies, or identify other sources used. Itother Mobilew sources include such items as ground support equipment.

Emission Sources (Tonslyear) Permitted Personal Aircraft Other Total Stationar Automobil Emissions Mobile Y es CO --1.4 6.47 n/a n/a 7.87 NOx 5.6 .57 n/a n/a 6.17 - VOC 29.74 .666 n/a n/a 30.41 PMlO 0.5 n/a n/a n/a .50 Source Document: SDAPCD 1990 Emission Inventory - Note: SDAPCD 1990 Emission Inventory and Personal Automobiles ,,,,, calculations attached. 465-CPF JUM 96 Sd. For your base, determine the total FYI993 level of emissions (tonslyr) for CO, NOx, VOC, PMlO for the general - sources listed. For all data provide a list of the sources and show vour calculations. Use known emissions data, or emissions derived from use of state methodologies, or identify other sources used. "Other ~obile"sources include such items as ground support equipment.

Emissions Sources (Tons/Year) Pollutant Permitted Personal Aircraft Other Total Stationar Automobil Emissions Mobile Y es 1.9 6.47 n/a n/a 8.37 8.2 .57 n/a n/a 8.77 49.9 .666 n/a n/a 50.566 F[PMlO 0.5 .50 n/a n/a n/a Source Document: SDAPCD 1992 Emission Inventory NOTE* The APCD (San Diego) has not calculated 1993 emissions as of 5/18/94. The above numbers are 1992 data. Note: SDAPCD 1992 Emission Inventory and Personal Automobiles - calculations attached. Change 465-CPF 58. Provide estimated increases/decreases in air emissions JUN 94 (Tonslyear of CO, NOx, VOC, PM10) expected within the next six years (1995-2001). Either from previous BRAC realignments and/or previously planned downsizing shown in the Presidents FY1997 budget. Explain. NAVSTA should experience insignificant increases or decreases in air emissions over the next six years. Sf. Are there any critical air quality regions (i.e. non- attainment areas, national parks, etc.) within 100 miles of the base? South Coast Air Quality District (Los Angeles). CNSP EF'HC TEHFI ID:615-L37-547[] JLlN Og'clil 14:16 Ni~.Oc'll F.111: P@! lilt!( I '~YL 13: U3 blY33b3l3 5 NPI\,'L I k 511 Jl!llt CWq P&GE fl i hT

SOAPCD 1990 EM1SSlON INVENTORY

'.> I t I .--+-" -- I + mi a3 r t----t- TOTALS .. - CMSP BFHC TEQM 'K*b/'lC.'.LYYL( 15.d3 CNSF' EF'FIC TEHN ID:615-a37-5~70 JUN ilE"cil 14315 tdo.OC11 F.i16 '+J?f );'ti,'.l:?:q 1 :I; 143 tlY~SQ~LY 3 I U4113 I C) LU' C.,.ICI~ VII~ r~~t173

. ---- I--. _ _ .. - .. SUMMARY SHEET UIC: NO0245

5g. Have any base operations/mission/functions (i.e.: training, R&D, ship movement, aircraft movement, military operations, support functions, vehicle trips per day, etc.) been restricted or delayed due to air quality considerations? Explain the reason for the restriction and the ttfixttimplemented or planned to correct. Applications for all new equipment have been put on hold pending the completion of the New Source Review (NSR). The NSR is a study qualifying all emissions from permitted sources that is required by the APCD.

5h. Does your base have Emission ~eductionCredits (ERCs) or is it subject to any emission offset requirements? If yes, provide details of the sources affected and conditions of the ERCs and offsets. Is there any potential for getting ERCs? The SDAPCD has not established a complete proyram for accounting for ERCS. -Offsets may be required. The need for offsets will occur if we are defined as a major source for a criteria pollutant. The determination of NAVSTA's source status will be determined by the new source review.

6. ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE

6a. Identify compliance costs, currently known or estimated that are required for permits or other actions required to brins existins wractices into comwliance with appropriate regulations. Do not include Installation Restoration costs that are covered in Section 7. For the last two columns provide the combined total. for those two FY's.

Safe Drinking Y 100 100 100 100 225 225 Water Act PCBs Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other (non-PCB) N 1100 0 0 0 0 0 Toxic Substance Control Act d UIC: NO0245

Lead Based N 0 0 0 0 0 0 Paint Radon N 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Clean Water Act Y 691 300 400 400 800 800 Solid Waste N 238 100 134 108 216 216 Oil Pollution N 0 330 80 80 80 80 Act USTs Y 50 100 100 100 250 250 Other NONE 0 0 0 0 0 N/A

Total 3,960 2,500 3,650 2,650 - 3,625 --3,725 Provide a separate list of compliance projects in progress or required, with associated cost and estimated start/completion date.

TITLE TOT REOUIREMENT START FINISH AB2588 UPDATES 200,000 FY94 AIR EMISS CONT PROJ 50,000 FY94 AIR EMISS INV/EPCRA 100,000 FY94 RADON SURVEY 20,000 FY94 RMPP 100,000 FY94 TRIP REDUCTION 50,000 FY94 SRC TST AIR EMIS 500,000 FY94 TITLE V PERMITTING 200,000 FY94 NEW SCORE REV UPDAT 100,000 FY94 AIR TOX RISKRED PL 30t000 FY94 ASBESTOS SURVEY 1,100,000 FY94 CULTURAL RESRCS SVY 50f 000 FY94 HARP 501000 FY94 COMPL MAP 500,000 FY94 CONST COMPOST FAC 250,000 FY94 CORRECTIVE MEAS STU 700,000 FY94 DEMO PROCESSOR/GLAS 100,000 FY94 INDUSTRAL SCRUBBER 50,000 FY94 UST CORR PROT 20f 000 FY94 UST SITE ASSES8MENT 100,000 FY94 UST SPILL/OVERFLOW 20,000 FY94 SITE REM-OLD SITE 300,000 FY94 SITE REM-NEW SITE 350,000 FY94 UST REMOVAL 32ND GA 100,000 FY94 IMPL OIL/SOLV PLAN 100,000 FY94 REPL METE CHILORIDE 50,000 FY94 TIERED PERMITTING 700,000 FY94 TIERED PERMITTING/OWS 30,000 FY94 UIC: NO0245

IMPL POLL PREV PLAN IND WW MGMT PLAN OPA-9 0 SEDIMENT MONITORING NPDES PT SOURCE MON ELIM ILL STRM DRN ELIM ILL STRM DRAIN IMPLEMENT SPCCISCP IMPLEMNT SPCC/SCP P CONDUCT WW PRETREAT STRMWATER MONITORIN CONSTRUCT BMPS 6b. Does your base have structures containing asbestos?- YES What % of your base has been surveyed for asbestos? 25% Are additional surveys planned? YES What is the estimated cost to remediate asbestos ($K) -1 ,2'0 0 . Are asbestos survey costs based on encapsulation, removal or a combination of both? Encapsulation

6c. Provide detailed cost of operatic costs, with funding source. II I I I 11 Funding Source I FY92 I FY93 I PY94

lrOther (specify) 0 0 0 Y TOTAL 1 838 1 1255 ( 2540 6d. Are there any compliance issues/requirements that have impacted operations and/or development plans at your base. NONE

7. INSTALLATION RESTORATION 7a.

Does your base have any sites that are contaminated YES with hazardous substances or petroleum products? UIC: NO0245

Is your base an NPL site or proposed NPL site? NO

7b. Provide the following information about your Installation Restoration (IR) program. Project list may be provided in separate table format. Note: List only projects eligible for funding under the Defense Environmental Restoration Account (DERA). Do not include UST compliance projects properly listed in section VI.

Site # or Type, Groundwater Drinking Cost to ~tatus~/~omments name site Extends off Water Complete Contaminate base? Source? ( $MI /Est d? Compl. Date 1. Ship CERCLA Yes no no 3.5M/Apr PA/SI completed. repair 97 esi sched. 94 basin 2. Mole CERCLA Yes no no 104M/Jun PA/SI Complete pier 99 RI 95 - 3. Salvage CERCLA Yes no no 7.6M/Jan PA/SI complete yard 98 RI 95 4. DPDO CERCLA Yes no no 6M/Jan 98 PA/SI complete stor.yard RI 95 5. Admiral CERCLA no no no 20K/Jan 95 SWAT complete Baker Field ---- UIC: NO0245

% 6. Murphy CERCLA no no no 2OK/Jan 95 PA/SI complete Canyon esi 95 7. Sewer CERCLA Yes no no 8.2M/Apr PA/SI complete plant 98 RI 95

@.Fire CERCLA Yes no no 4M/Jan 00 Removal 94 - ight school

9. PCB CERCLA no no no 2OK/Jan 95 PA complete SI stor. yard 94 LO. Rice CERCLA Yes no no lM/Jun 96 Not a site No king site further action

11. French CERCLA no no no 20K/Jun 95 PA complete SI drain 94 L2. CERCLA Yes no no 2.1M/Jan RFI workplan Brinser 97 Implemented 94 Street parking 13. Paint RCRA un no no unknown RFI workplan shop known implemented 94 14. PWC RCRA unknown no no unknown RFI workplan transport. implemented 94 15. RCRA unknown no no unknown RFI workplan Steadfast implemented 94 16. NEX RCRA unknown no no unknown RFI workplan serv. sta. implemented 94 17. RCRA unknown no no unknown RFI workplan Printing implemented 94 off ice 18. DDDC RCRA unknown no no unknown RFI workplan implemented 94 19. SIMA RCRA unknown no no unknown trans. UIC: NO0245

Type site: CERCLA, 'RCRA corrective action (CA), UST or other (explain) Status = PA, SI, RI, RD, RA, long term monitoring, etc. UIC: NO0245

7c. Have any contamination sites been identified for which there is no recognized/accepted remediation process available? List. No

Not applicable 1 I 11

Is there a groundwater treatment system planned? NO

State scope and expected length of pump and treat operation.

Has a RCFtA Facilities Assessment been performed for YES your base?

7f. Does your base operate any "Conforming StorageN facilities for handling hazardous materials? If YES, describe facility, capacity, restrictions, and permit conditions. Fleet Industrial Supply Cenetr operates a HAZMART Re-use Facility on Naval Station San Diego. This facility handles hazardous materials for NAVSTA, North Island and Miramar activities. The HAZMART Re-use Facility was developed to assist San Diego activities meet waste miniomiza.tion goals. There are 600 line items in the HAZMART, and 900 items in the Re-use Center. The Facility is located in building 3499 onb Mole Pier in 2 rub structures. The facility is restricted only by the rub structure capacity and no permit is required.

7g. Does your base operate any Itconforming Storagetffacilities for handling hazardous waste? If YES, describe facility, capacity, restrictions, and permit conditions. The term Ifconforming Storagetfdoes not apply to hazardous waste facilities. On Naval Station San Diego, the Public Works Center operates one Part B hazardous waste storage facility. The NAVSTA facility was completed in November 1992, and secured a Part B permit in August of 1993. The facility has a standard layout with segregated storage bays, secondary containment, and fire suppression systems. Capacity is approximately six million pounds of waste per year, but averages 2.5 million pounds per year. Permit conditions are too numerous to list, but include the training plan, analysis plan, and inspection schedules common to all permitted facilities. One restriction worth noting, UIC: NO0245 transportation of hazardous waste from off site through National City, is not allowed between 0700 to 0830 and 1430 to 1600 hours to reduce the possible exposures to an elementary school within a half mile of the base. UIC: NO0245 7h. Is your base responsible for any non-appropriated fund facilities (exchange, gas station) that require cleanup? If so, describe facility/location and cleanup requiredlstatus. YES Fuel tank leakage at the Navy Exchange gas station located at the intersection of 32nd Street and Wabash Blvd. is currently being monitored and will require free product recovery at an estimated cost of $4650,000.00.

Do the results of any radiological surveys NO conducted indicate limitations on future land use? Explain below.

8. LAND / AIR / WATER USE 8a. List the acreage of each real estate component controlled or managed by your base (e.g., Main Base - 1,200 acres, Outlying Field - 200 acres, Remote Range - 1,000 acres, remote antenna site - 5 acres, Off-Base Housing Area - 25 acres). L I I 11 Parcel Descriptor Acres Location MAIN BASE 1029.45 NAVAL STATION NAVAL RECREATION CENTER 448.16 MISSION GORGE 11 DEPERMING FAC. 119.74 1 POINT LOMA 11 - - DEPERMING FAC . 1.66 POINT LOMA NAUTICAL MILE 0.04 LA JOLLA UIC: NO0245 8b. Provide the acreage of the land use categories listed in the table below: LAND USE CATEGORY ACRES Total Developed: (administration, Naval Station operational, housing, recreational, 1029.45, Naval training, etc. ) Recreation Center 448.16, Deperming Fac. 19.74, Degaussing Fac. 1.66, Nautical Mile 0.04. Total Undeveloped (areas that are left in Wetlands: their natural state but are under Approximately 16 specific environmental development acres. constraints, i.e.: wetlands, endangered species, etc. ) All Others:

Total Undeveloped land considered to be NAVSTA 10.12 without development constraints, but (ESQD), POINT LOMA which may have operational/man caused 1.08 (ESQA) constraints (i.e.: HERO, HERF, HERP, ESQD, AICUZ, etc. ) TOTAL Total Undeveloped land considered to be NONE without development constraints Total Off-base lands held for NONE

Breakout of ESQD 11.20 undeveloped, restricted areas. HERF NONE Some restricted HERP NONE areas may overlap: HERO NONE AICUZ NONE Airfield Safety NONE Criteria Other NONE .I 8c. How many acres on your base (includes off base sites) are dedicated for training purposes (e.g., vehicular, earth moving, mobilization)? This does not include buildings or interior small

30 UIC: NO0245

arms ranges used for training purposes. Moblization 10.43

8d. What is the date of your last AICUZ update? NONE -1- 1- Are any-waivers of airfield safety criteria in effect on your base? Y/N Su:mmarize the conditions of the waivers below. UIC: NO0245 8e. List the off-base land use types (e.g, residential, industrial, agricultural) and acreage within Noise Zones 2 & 3 generated by your flight operations and whether it is compatible/incompatible with AICUZ guidelines on land use.

Acreage/Location/~D Zones 2 or Land Use Compatible 3 / Incompatib le NOT APPLICABLE - NOT - - - WITHIN AN ACUIZ

8f. List the navigational channels and berthing areas controlled by your base which require maintenance dredging? Include the frequency, volume, current project depth, and costs of the maintenance requirement.

Navigational Location / Maintenance Dredging Requirement Channels/ Descriptio Berthing n Areas Frequency Volume Current Cost (Years) (MCY) Project ($/Cubic Depth Yard) (FT) QUAY N-1 NAVSTA SD 7-10 Variable 30 5.25 PIER .1 NAVSTA SD 7-10 Variable 30 5.25 QUAY N-2 NAVSTA SD 7-10 Variable 30 5.25 PIER 2 NAVSTA SD 7-10 Variable 37 5.25 QUAY N-3 NAVSTA SD 7-10 Variable 30 5.25 PIER 3 NAVSTA SD 7-10 Variable 30 5.25 QUAY N-4 NAVSTA SD 7-10 Variable 30 5.25 PIER 4 NAVSTA SD 7-10 Variable 30 5.25 QUAY N-5 NAVSTA SD 7-10 Variable 30 5.25 PIER 5 NAVSTA SD 7-10 Variable 30 5.25 QUAY N-6 NAVSTA SD 7-10 Variable 30 5.25 PIER 6 NAVSTA SD 7-10 Variable 30 5.25 * UIC: NO0245

QUAY N-7 NAVSTA SD 7-10 Variable 30 5.25 PIER 7 NAVSTA SD 7-10 Variable 37 5.25 QUAY N-8 NAVSTA SD 7-10 Variable 30 5.25 PIER 8 NAVSTA SD 7-10 Variable 37 5.25 MOLE PIER NAVSTA SD 7-10 Variable 30 5.25 PIER 10 NAVSTA SD 7-10 Variable 25 5.25 Navigational Location / Maintenance Dredging Requirement Channels/ Descriptio Berthing n Frequency Volume Current Cost Areas ('Years) (MCY) Project ($M/Cubic Depth Yard) (FT) QUAY N-11 NAVSTA SD 7-10 Variable 25 5.25 PIER 11 NAVSTA SD 7-10 Variable 25 5.25 QUAY N-12 NAVSTA SD 7-1.0 Variable 25 5.25 PIER 12 NAVSTA SD 7-1.0 Variable 25 5.25 QUAY N-13 NAVSTA SD 7-10 Variable 25 5.25 PIER 13 NAVSTA SD 7-10 Variable 37 5.25 QUAY N-14 NAVSTA SD 7-10 Variable 25 5.25 PIER 14 NAVSTA SD 7-10 Variable 25 5.25 NAVIGATIONAL NAVSTA SD 3 Variable 30 5.25 CHANNEL CHOLLAS NAVSTASD 3 Variable 20 5.25 CREEK CHANNEL PALLETA NAVSTA SD 3 Variable 20 5.25 CREEK CHANNEL

8g. Summarize planned projects through FY 1997 requiring new channel or berthing area dredged depths, include location, volume and depth. MCON PROJECT P-338s Dredging berths and approach of Pier 3 to 37' Mean Low Low Water (MLLW) . MCON PROJECT P-278 Dredging berths of Pier 4 to 37' MLLW. MCON PROJECT P-279 Dredging sides of pier and approach to 37' MLLW. MCON PROJECT P-331 Dredge berths and approach to 37' MLLW. MCON PROJECT P-326 Dredge Pier 10 to 37' MLLW. MCON PROJECT P-327 Dredge pier 11 to 37' MLLW. MCON PROJECT P-217 Dredge near proposed pier 14 to 37' MLLW. MCON PROJECT P-332s Dredge approach to Pier 2 to 37' MLLW. SPEC PROJECT MI-93 Maintenance drege of Chollas Creek. 8h. Are there available designated dredge disposal NONE areas for maintenance dredging material? List location, remaining capacity, and future limitations. Are there available designated dredge disposal NONE areas for new dredge material? List location, remaining capacity, and future limitations. Are the dredged materials considered N/A - NO contaminated? List known contaminants. DREDGE DISPOSAL AREAS

8.i. List any requirements or constraints resulting from consistency with State Coastal Zone Management Plans. NONE

8j. Describe any non-point source pollution problems affecting water UIC: NO0245 quality ,e.g.: coastal erosion. Stormwater runoff may be contaminated. 8k. If the base has a cooperative agreement with the US FishNONE and Wildlife Service and/or the State Fish and Department for conducting a hunting and fishing program, does the agreement or these resources constrain either current or future operations or activities? Explain the nature and extent of restrictions.

81. List any other areas on your base which are indicated as protected or preserved habitat other than threatened/endangered species that have been listed in Section 1. List the species, whether or not treated, and the acres protected/preserved. Protected migratory bird rockery for the Black Crowned Herons, Nycticorax nyticorax. Approximately 1 acre in size. UIC: NO0245

9a. Are there existing or potential environmental showstoppers that have affected or will affect the accomplishment of the installation mission that have not been covered in the previous 8 questions? MARPOL, OPA.90, EPCRA, Tiered Permitting 9b. Are there any other environmental permits required for base operations, include any relating to industrial operations. Ind. waste water discharge permit 9c. Describe any other environmental or encroachment restrictions on base property not covered in the previous 8 sections. NONE 9d. List any future/proposed laws/regulations or any proposed laws/regulations which will constrain base operations or development plans in any way. Explain. Tiered permit - future requirement to provide OWS with secondary containment may constrain base operations. Also, some of the forthcoming rules and regulations promulgated by the 1990 Clean Air Act which may significantly hinder operations at NAVST are the NEW SOURCE REVIEW (NSR) and TITLE V PERMITTING. Operational efficiency and effectiveness could be severely hampered if the findings reveal that emission reductions are required. BRAC-95 CERTIFICATION DATA CALL THIRTY THREE

NAVSTA SAN DIEGO

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. MAJOR CLAIMANT LEVEL

J. R. FITZGERALD NAME (Please type or print) Commander In Chief (Acting) I Title Date

U. S. Pacific Fleet Activity

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

DEPUTY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS (LOGISTICS) DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF

ACTING 07 JULla4 Title Date BRAC 95 DATA CALL THIRTY THREE NAVAL STATION SAN DIEGO I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. TYPE COMMANDER LEVEL

/

I DAVI B. ROBINSON, VADM, USN COMMANDER, NAVAL SURFACE FORCE, U.S. PACIFIC FLEET

DATE : 7/3-

D. G. ROACH, CAPT, CEC. USN- - FORCE CIVIL-ENGINEER ' COMMANDER, NAVAL SURFACE FORCE, U.S. PACIFIC FLEET

DATE : +(h N TREV NO (( (( ~ORCEFACILITIES PLANNER COMMANDER, NAVAL SURFACE FORCE, U.S. PACIFIC FLEET BRAC-95 DATA CALL NUMBER THIRTY THREE CERTIFICATION

Reference: SECNAVNOTE 1 1OOO of 08 December 1993

In accordance with policy set forth by the Secretary of the Navy, personnel of the Department of the Navy, uniformed and civilian, who provide information for use in the BRAC-95 process are required to provide a signed certification that states 'I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief."

The signing of this certification constitutes a representation that the certifying official has reviewed the information and either (1) personally vouches for its accuracy and completeness or (2) has possession of, and is relying upon, a certification executed by a competent subordinate.

Each individual in your activity generating information for the BRAC-95 process must certify that information. Enclosure (1) is provided for individual certifications and may be duplicated as necessary. You are directed to maintain those certifications at your activity for audit purposes. For purposes of this certification sheet, the commander of the activity will begin the certification process and each reporting senior in the Chain of Command reviewing the information will also sign this certification sheet. This sheet must remain attached to this package and be forwarded up the Chain of Command. Copies must be retained by each level in the Chain of Command for audit purposes.

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief

ACTIVITY COMMANDER

M. K. COLLINS, CAPTAIN, USN NAME (Please type or print) Signature

COMMAND1 NG OFFICER avm'q YY Title Date

NAVAL STATION SAN DIEGO, CA. Activity

Enclosure (1) BRAC-95 CERTIFICATION DATA CALL THIRTY-THREE NAVSTA SAN DIEGO

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

R. J. Z1,ATOPER NAME (Please type or print) Comrnan der In Chi e f Title U. S. Pacific Fleet Activity

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

DEPUTY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS (LOGISTICS) DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF (INSTALLATIONS & LOGISTICS)

NAME (Please type or print) Signature

Title Date DATA CALL 1: GENERAL INSTALLATION INFORMATION 1. ACTIVITY: Follow example as provided in the table below (delete the examples when providing your input). If any of the questions have multiple responses, please provide all. If any of the information requested is subject to change between now and the end of Fiscal Year (FY)1995 due to known redesignations, realignments/closures or other action, provide current and projected data and so annotate.

Name

Complete Mailing Address Commanding Officer Naval Station Box 368016 3455 Senn Road San Diego, CA 92136-5079

PLAD

NAVSTA SAN DIEGO CA

PRIMARY UIC: NO0245 (Plant Account UIC for Plant Account Holders) Enter this number as the Activity identifier at the top of each Data Call response page.

ALL OTHER UIC(s): N46262 PURPOSE: Security

2. PLANT ACCOUNT HOLDER: Yes X No -- (check one)

REVISED BY CWNAVSURFPAC 1 FEB 94 3. ACTIVITY TYPE: Choose most appropriate type that describes your activity and completely answer all questions.

HOST COMMAND: A host command is an activity that provides facilities for its own functions and the functions of other (tenant) activities. A host has accountability for Class 1 (land), and/or Class 2 (buildings, structures, and utilities) property, regardless of occupancy. It can also be a tenant at other host activities.

Yes A No - (check one)

TENANT COMMAND: A tenant command is an activity or unit that occupies facilities for which another activity (i.e., the host) has accountability. A tenant may have several hosts, although one is usually designated its primary host. If answer is "Yes," provide best known information for your primary host only.

Yes No X (check one) Primary Host (current) UIC: Primary Host (as of 01 Oct 1995) UIC: Primary Host (as of 01 Oct 2001) UIC:

INDEPENDENT ACTIVITY: For the purposes of this Data Call, this is the "catch- all" designator, and is defined as any activity not previously identified as a host or a tenant. The activity may occupy owned or leased space. Government Owned/Contractor Operated facilities should be included in this designation if not covered elsewhere.

Yes No X (check one)

REVISED BY CWNAVSURFPAC 1 FEE 94 4. SPECIAL AREAS: List all Special Areas. Special Areas are defined as Class 11Class 2 property for which your command has responsibility that is not located on or contiguous to main complex.

5. DETACHMENTS: If your activity has detachments at other locations, please list them in the table below.

Name UIC Location Host name Host UIC None

6. BRAC IMPACT: Were you affected by previous Base Closure and Realignment decisions (BRAC-88, -91, andlor -93)? If so, please provide a brief narrative.

BRAC 88 MILCON project P-323R, Pier 3 Upgrade and BRAC 91 MILCON projects P- 338S, Pier 3 Dredging and P-332S, Pier 2 Dredging, are critical to meeting future berthing

REVISED BY CWNAVSURFPAC 1 FEB 94 3 requirements. The most critical factor affecting NAVSTA's ability to adequately berth ships is the number of deep draft (deeper than -30' MLLW) power intensive (3200 amp's or more) ships assigned. We will not be able to adequately berth additional DDPI ships without MILCON support to increase dredge depths and upgrade power transformers.

The effects of BRAC 93 on NAVSTA are significant. There is an influx of tenants which, for the most part, are being absorbed by the local contingent of those commands with little or no requirement for additional spaces. The instances where more space is required, NAVSTA has been able to satisfy these requirements.

Fleet Training Center, for example, will be absorbing some schools here from bases which will be closed such as NTC San Diego. The additional classrooms and associated spaces are to be provided thru MILCON P-023T at a cost of $8,403,000.00. With the additional schools, come an increase in student loading. The Morale, Welfare and Recreation Facilities and the base galley will be able to absorb this increase with minimal impact. To date no project for additional BEQ facilities has been identified. NAVSTA MILCON project P-254 a twelve story barracks to house 566 El-E4, and 227 E5-E6 personnel, is currently programmed for FY98 accomplishment. MILCON project P-254 should be flagged as a critical path MILCON to satisfy bachelor housing requirements that encompass ALL BRAC related moves to NAVSTA, vice numerous small BEQ projects related to specific tenant/command moves. Since NAVSTA is so land constrained with large portions of the base falling in the IR program and with a heavy parking requirement, NAVSTA cannot afford the land to build numerous small facilities (BEQ's etc.), therefore, building high capacity high rise facilities that combine requirements and conserve land usage must be pursued.

7. MISSION: Do not simply report the standard mission statement. Instead, describe important functions in a bulletized format. Include anticipated mission changes and brief narrative explanation of change; also indicate if any current/projected mission changes are a result of previous BRAC-88, -91 ,-93 action(@.

Current Missions

Naval Station San Diego supports the missions of the Department of Defense and U. S. Navy by providing support and quality of life survices for Navy operations and related activities in the San Diego area. Areas of support and service include:

Shuttle Bus service and vehicle support

REVlSED BY COMNAVSURFPAC 1 FEB 94 Communications

Public Affairs

Security

Pier Services and Harbor Movement Operations (tugs/pilots) Ship Magnetic Silencing

Shore Patrol and Local Law Enforcement Liaison

Recycling

Environmental (including oil spill response)

Safety

Bachelor Quarters

Galley

Religious Programs

Self-Help for minor construction and maintenance

Family Support services

Transition Assistance

Relocation Assistance

Navy Exchange and Commissary Stores

Fire Protection

Child Care

Medical and Dental services

REVISED BY COMNAVSURFPAC 1 FEB 94 Welfare and Recreation

These support services are provided for:

3 Cruiser- Group Commanders

1 Amphibious Group Commander

2 Readiness Squadrons

8 Tactical Squadron Commanders 56 SURPAC ships homeported at Naval Station

Harbor movement operations for 2 carriers at NAS North Island

14 submarines and four submarine support ships at Ballast Point

All PACFLT ships undergoing refresher training or shakedown at Afloat Training Group San Diego

Visiting allied ships

49 Tenant Commands including Readiness Surface Group, Afloat Training, and Fleet Training Command

Naval Station also operates the Mission Gorge Recreation Area for the San Diego-wide community of 145,000 active duty personnel, 200,000 dependents and 103,000 retirees and dependents.

projected Missions for FY 2001

It is not anticipated that the overall mission of Naval Station will change, however, certain aspects of support and services currently provided will most likely increase as a result of projected base closings and consolidation. 8. UNIQUE MISSIONS: Describe any missions which are unique or relatively unique to the activity. Include information on projected changes. Indicate if your command has any National Command Authority or classified mission responsibilities.

REVISED BY COUNAVSURFPAC 1 FEB 94 6 Current Uniaue Missions

NONE

Proiected Uniaue Missions for FY 2001

NONE

9. IMMEDIATE SUPERIOR IN COMMAND (ISIC) : Identify your ISIC. If your ISIC is not your funding source, please identify that source in addition to the operational ISIC.

Operational name UIC COMNAVSURFPAC N53824

Funding Source UIC COMNAVSURFPAC N53824

REVISED BY COMNAVSURFPAC 1 FEE 94 10. PERSONNEL NUMBERS: Host activities are responsible for totalling the personnel numbers for all of their tenant commands, even if the tenant command has been asked to separately report the data. The tenant totals here should match the total tally for the tenant listing provided subsequently in this Data Call (see Tenant Activity list). (Civilian count shall include Appropriated Fund personnel only.)

On Board Count as of 01 Januarv 1994

Officers Enlisted Civilian (Appropriated)

Reporting Command 3 fn 3s Tenants (total) 2.022 22.922 L!M

Authorized Positions as of 30 Se~tember1994

Officers Enlisted Civ Non DOD

(Appropriated) Reporting Command 24 &IS! 396

Tenants (total) 2.015 24.372 5.138 21

11. KEY POINTS OF CONTACT (POC): Provide the work, FAX, and home telephone numbers for the Commanding Officer or OIC, and the Duty Officer. Include area code(s). You may provide other key POCs if so desired in addition to those above.

Title/Name Office HQl?E Commanding Officer CAPT M. K. COLLINS 619-556-2400 619-556-2423

Command Duty Officer 619-556-1246 N/A

REVISED BY COMNAVSURFPAC 1 FEB 94 8 Primary POC GEORGE N. WINNETT 619-556-13 16 619-556-3190 619-445-5757

Secondary POC BRUCE BROWN 619-556-1530 619-556-0633 619-286-1609

12. TENANT ACTIVITY LIST: This List nust be all-inclusive. Tmnt activities are to ensure that their host is aware of their existence and any Wsubleasing" of space. This list should include the name and UIC(s) of all organizations, shore comnands and homeported units, active or reserve, DOD or non-DOD (include comnercial entities). The tenant Listing should be reported in the format provide below, Listed in nunerical order by UIC, separated into the categories Listed below. Host activities are responsible for including authorized personnel nunbers, end strength as of 30 Sept- 1M,for all tenants, even if those tenants have also been asked to provide this information on a separate Data Call. (Civilian count shall include Appropriated Fund personnel only.)

Tenants residing on main coclplex (shore carmends)

94 REVISED BY COnNAVSURFPAC 1 FEE 9 Tcp.d Naum UIC Omoa mimed CiilLn

MuuTaCkqRcifie N57M2 39 m 7

Fbakm&Comnad,Rdhc N57094 6 9 0

Nanl Wapm S(uim. Sml Bach N6mOL 0 0 0

FbaTninirychbr N61690 20 44s 42

Dcfel~~a~Smrvi,mIhc Nd27M 0 0 57

NQnl 14 6 440

CNSP MTW SHORE I N4MZ I 1 I 10 I 0

REVISED BY COMNAVSURFPAC 1 FEB 94 10 CNSP RSG 1 N55236 I LO I 52 I 14 CNSP RSG rn I N46Zm I 1 I 41 I I I

T- CdNmm ULC - lhVs4.d Chili", CNSP DS NSG OPS N41bQ 2 1 0

COMPHIBORU THREE N52m 18 a 0 COMPHLBRON 1 N55297 9 20 0 - COM~RON3 NS~~I 9 m o

COMPHIBRON 5 N55269 9 P 0

COMPHIBRON 7 N5525W I I 13 0

COMPHIBRON 1DEr NW NM 2 6 0

COMPHIBRON 9 (4DECOM FY95) N4669O 12 I2 0

COMPHIBRON 9 Dl3 NEWT (DECOM FY95) N49997 I 4 0

COMCRUDESGRU ONE N5SYJl 7.4 33 0

COMCRUDESGRU THllFE NU7s0 7.4 33 0

COMCRUDESGRU FlVE (DECOM FY95) NUTIS 24 33 0

COMDESRON 5 NO114A 6 6 0

COMDESRON 7 NOLI6A 6 6 0

COMDESRON 13 NOIM 15 5 0

COMDESRON 13 SHORE DUrY COMP N42lU 0 8 0

COMWRON 13 NEUW COW N41966 0 9 0

COMDEsRON 17 (DECOM FY9n NOl26A 6 6 0

COMDESRON 21 NOlM 6 6 0

COMWRON 23 NO132A 6 6 0

COMDESRON 33 NSmS 14 S 0

COMDESRON 33 NEUW COMP N41331 0 9 0

COMWRON 33 SHORE DUlT COMP N421U 0 8 0

EODMU 7 Bo N82QO 3 22 0 i A

REVISED BY COMNAVSURFPAC 1 FEB 94 11 Tenants residing on main complex (homeported units.)

USS TRIPOLI (note: will NO7198 47 654 0 DECOM Sep 95) USS NEW ORLEANS NO7202 49 767 0 USS ANCHORAGE NO7203 18 304 0 USS JASON (note: will NO8810 39 926 0 DECOM Jun 95) USS MOUNT VERNON N20014 18 304 0 USS FORT FISHER N20015 18 303 0 USS FREDRICK (note: will N20023 14 235 0 DECOM 14 Jul95) USS BRISTOL COUNTY N20224 5 0 0 (note: will DECOM Sep 94) USS KINKAID N20576 22 310 0 USS ELLIOT N20587 22 329 0 USS OLDENDORF N20598 22 326 0 USS JOHN YOUNG N20599 2 1 313 0 , -

REVISED BY CCMNAVSURFPAC 1 FEB 94 12 A Tenant Command Name UIC Officer Enlisted Civilian USS MERRILL N20602 22 3 17 0 USS PELELIU N20748 58 1006 0 USS HARRY W HILL N20833 2 1 288 0 USS GEORGE PHILIP N20965 14 145 0 USS SIDES N20967 14 149 0 USS JOHN A MOORE N20972 14 145 0 USS LEWIS B PULLER N20976 14 145 0 USS COPELAND N20978 14 145 0 USS WADSWORTH N21033 14 145 0 USS DUNCAN (note: will N21034 14 145 0 DECOM Dec 94) USS ACADIA N2 1047 43 583 0 DECOM NOV 95 USS MAHLON S TISDALE N21052 14 145 0 USS REID N2 1055 16 195 0 USS JARRETT N21058 16 198 0 USS CAPE COD N21063 43 583 0 USS RENTZ N21198 16 198 0 USS VANDEGRIFT N21200 16 198 0 USS GARY N21232 16 198 0 USS VINCENNES N2 1295 27 353 0 USS VALLEY FORGE N2 1296 27 353 0 USS JOHN PAUL JONES N21313 22 315 0 A

REVISED BY COMNAVSURFPAC 1 FEB 94 Tenant Command Name UIC Officer Enlisted Civilian USS FORT MCHENRY N21400 21 291 0 (note: will relocate to COMFLEACT Sasebo Sep 95) USS LAKE CHAMPLAIN N21428 28 359 0 USS CALLAGHAN (note: N2 1437 2 1 3 10 0 will relocate to NAVSTA Everett Sep 96) USS CHANDLER (note: N2 1439 21 310 0 will relocate to NAVSTA Everett Sep 96) USS PRINCETON N21447 28 359 0 USS N2145 1 28 359 0 CHANCELLORSVILLE USS COMSTOCK N21452 21 301 0 USS RUSHMORE N21530 21 296 0 USS ESSEX N2 1533 62 1076 0 USS COWPENS N21623 28 359 0 USS CURTIS WILBUR N2 1640 22 315 0 USS SHILOH N2 1657 28 359 0 USS ANTIETAM (note: will N21387 0 0 0 shift from NSY Long Beach Sep 95) USS FITZGERALD (note: N2 1824 0 0 0 NEWCON arrives Apr 95) USS STETHEM (note: N2 1825 0 0 0 NEWCON arrives Jul 95) USS TARAWA N20550 5 8 1005 0 , A

REVISED BY COWNAVSURFPAC 1 FEE 94 14 i Tenant Command Name UIC Officer Enlisted Civilian USS BOXER (note: N2 1808 63 808 0 NEWCON arrives Dec 94) USS OGDEN (note: will NO7176 25 361 0 change homeport from NAVSTA Long Beach Feb

REVISED BY COUNAVSURFPAC 1 FEE 94 Tenants residing in Special Areas (Special Areas are defined as real estate owned by host command not contiguous with main complex; e.g. outlying fields).

i Tenant Cumnand Name UIC Location Officer Enlisted CiviLian

EOOW 3 55447 Magnetic Silencing 0 14 0 Note: These figures are Facility included in Item 12. Tenant Activity List

Tenants (Other than those identified previously)

13. REGIONAL SUPPORT: Identify your relationship with other activities, not reported as a host/tenant, for which you provide support. gain, this list should be all-inclusive. The intent of this question is capture the full breadth of the mission of your command and your customer/supplier relationships. Include in your answer any Government Owned/Contractor Operated facilities for which you provide administrative oversight and control.

Activity name Support function (include mechanism such as ISSA, MOU,

Shore Patrol SECURITY SERVICES, CINCPACFLTINST 5440.3H

BACHELOR QUARTERS, Personnel Unit NAVSTASDIEWINST 5450.8L

U. S. Postal

REVISED BY CWNAVSURFPAC 1 FEE 94 16 14. FACILITY MAPS: This is a primary responsibility of the plant account holders/host commands. Tenant activities are not required to comply with submission if it is known that your host activity has complied with the request. Maps and photos should not be dated earlier than 01 January 1991, unless annotated that no changes have taken place. Any recent changes should be annotated on the appropriate map or photo. Date and label all copies. Local Area Map. This map should encompass, at a minimum, a 50 mile radius of your activity. Indicate the name and location of all DoD activities within this area, whether or not you support that activity. Map should also provide the geographical relationship to the major civilian communities within this radius. (Provide 12 copies.) Installation Map / Activity Map / Base Map / General Development Map / Site Map. Provide the most current map of your activity, clearly showing all the land under ownership/control of your activity, whether owned or leased. Include all outlying areas, special areas, and housing. Indicate date of last update. Map should show all structures (numbered with a legend, if available) and all significant restrictive use areas/zones that encumber further development such as HERO, HERP, HERF, ESQD arcs, agricultural/forestry programs, environmental restrictions (e.g., endangered species). (Provide in two sizes: 36"~42" (2 copies, if available) ; and llnx 17" (12 copies) .) Aerial photo(s). Aerial shots should show all base use areas (both land and water) as well as any local encroachment sites/issues. You should ensure that these photos provide a good look at the areas identified on your Base Map as areas of concernlinterest - remember, a picture tells a thousand words. Again, date and label all copies. (Provide 12 copies of each, 8%"~11". ) Air Installations Compatible Use Zones (AICUZ) Map. (Provide 12 copies. ) N/A. No Air Installations located on NAVSTA San Diego.

REVISED BY COUNAVSURFPAC 1 FEB 94 INSTALLATION DATA

NAVSTA SAN DIEW

GENERAL INFORMATION

This is the fust Data Call for the 1995 base realignment and closure (BRAC-95) process. This General Information Data Call is designed to provide the Base Structure Evaluation Committee (BSEC) with a broad view of each installation, looking across the entire range of missions performed, who performs them, and the geographic alignment of each installation (internal to itself and the relationship to the surrounding community). The desired end result of this Data Call is to give the BSEC a complete picture of the shore facility infrastructure and general information on every organization performing a mission for the Department of the Navy today. This review is gpt limited to "above threshold" activities (those activities with more than 300 civilian personnel). It is absolutely imperative that all organizations complete the appropriate information about their organization so that follow-on Data Calls can be correctly focused and complete. There will be other Data Calls organized by category/subcategory (function) to gather information on military value, capacity, and economic/environmentalimpact.

The activities receiving this Data Call will fall into one of three categories: host command; tenant command; or independent activity. Each activity will be asked to identify themselves into one of these three categories. Due to the broad nature of the Data Call, not all questions will be applicable to all respondents, but all questions require a complete response. If a question is not applicable to your organization, clearly mark the response as "NIA"; do not leave blank.

The Data Call has been structured so that all responses, with the exception of the facility maps, can be made within the Data Call without the need to provide enclosures. The format for the tabular data allows for the expansion of each row as additional data is inputted, by pressing "enter" each time a new entry is made. Responses should be as complete and concise as possible.

In accordance with SECNAVNOTE 11000 of 08 December 1993, pertaining to the BRAC-95 process, all data provided must be certified and will be submitted hardcopy. Distribution of the Data Calls will flow through the operational command structure and inquiries should be directed in that manner to facilitate consistent and informative responses.

REVISED BY COnNAVSURFPAC 1 FEB 94 DA.TA CALL 1

BRAC-95 CERTIFICATION

Activity: NAVSTA SAN DIEGO

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. MAJOR CLAIMANT LEVEL

J. R. FITZGERALD NAME (Please type or print) Commander in Chief 2 115 (4$ Title Date

U. S. Pacific Fleet Activity (Acting)

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

DEPUTY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF (INSTALLATIONS

w T.nft11S NAME (Ple&&pnht) U . S . NaOp ~~~~tychief of Naval ~p~rations( ~ogistics) 23 FEB 1994 Title Date BRAC 95 DATA CALL ONE NAVAL STATION SAN DIEGO

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

TYPE COMMANDER LEVE4

DATE: ?//,/SU DEPUTY AND CHIEF OF STAFF COMMANDER, NAVAL SURFACE FORCE, U.S. PACIFIC FLEET

A PA DATE: ;///?A D. G. ROACH, CAPT, CEC, USN FORCE CIVIL ENGINEER . COMMANDER, NAVAL SURFACE FORCE, U.S. PACIFIC FLEET BRAC-95 DATA CALL NUMBER ONE CERTIFTCATION

Reference: SECNAVNOTE 11000 of 08 December 1993

In accordance with policy set forth by the: Secretary of the Navy, personnel of the Department of the Navy, uniformed and civilian, who provide information for use in the BRAC-95 process are required to provide a signed certification that states "I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief."

The signing of this certification constitutes a representation that the certifying official has reviewed the information and either (1) personally vouches for its accuracy and completeness or (2) has possession of, and is relying upon, a certification executed by a competent subordinate.

Each individual in your activity generating information for the BRAC-95 process must certify that information. Enclosure (I) is provided for individual certifications and may be duplicated as necessary. You are directed to maintain those certifications at your activity for audit purposes. For purposes of this certification sheet, the commander of the activity will begin the certification process and each reporting senior in the Chain of Command reviewing the irlformation will also sign this certification sheet. This sheet must remain attached to this package and be forwarded up the Chain of-Command. Copies must be retained by each level in the Chain of Command for audit purposes.

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

ACTIVITY COMMANDER

M. K. COLLINS, CAlTAIN, USN NAME (Please type or print) Signature

COMMANDING OFFICER Title Date

NAVAL STATION SAN DIEGO, CA. Activity

Enclosure (2) Document Separator DATA CALL 63 FAMILY HOUSING DATA 37

Information on Family Housing is required for use in BRAC-95 return on investment calculations.

Percentage of Military Families Living 19 ,., 7 ! I -1 1 /t: ' LC,/' On-Base: - ' --- Number of Vacant Officer Housing 0 Units: Number of Vacant Enlisted Housing Units: I FY 1996 Family Housing Budget 14w d3,1c ~;cl' (%OOOh:---- - m Total Number of Officer Housing (2 LJ Units: - 2 Total Number of Enlisted Housing ,'r ,? , \ I, L.'(,' ) Units: I 3 : I Line 4, Percentage of Military Families Living on Base, is taken from DD Form 1377. Lines 7-9, represents the activitys' "fair share" of the complex total of the family housing budget and inventory of officer and enlisted units. This data was provided by COMNAVFACENGCOM. This UIC contains 287 personnel entitled to BAQ WIDependents out of a complex total of 44294 personnel entitled to BAQ WIDependents.

There are 660 activities identified within this complex.

Note: All data should reflect figures as of the beginning of FY 1996. If major DON installations share a family housing complex, figures should reflect an estimate of the installation's prorated share of the family housing complex.

,, ,, I (' i, / :/aI Enclosure (1) I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

MAJOR CLAIMANT LEVEL

- J. E. BUFFINGTON, RADM, CEC, USN NAME (Please type or print) COMMANDER Title Date

NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND Activity

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

DEPUTY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS (LOGISTICS) DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF (INSTALLATIONS & LOGISTICS)

NAME (Please type or pinit) Signature 7 /z&f Title Date Reference: SECNAV NOTE llOCO dtd 8 Dec 93 In accordance with policy set forth by the Secretary of t.he Navy, 2ersonnel of the Deparzment of tk.e Navy, uniformed and civilian, who provide information for use in :he EWC-9s process are reqlired to provide a signed certification that states "I certify that the information cz~ntainedherein is accurate and conlplete to =he best of my krlowleclqe and belief.'

Tk.e siani~.g of this certificateor. coxstitutes a representation tk.at the certifying official has reviewed the informatior. and eL tk.er (1) personally vouches f oz its accuracy and cor.ple teness cr (2) has possession of, and is relying upon, a certification execut2d by a conpetent subordinate. Each individual in yoLr activity generating information for the BRAC-95 process must certify that infomation. Ecclosure (1) is provided for individual certifications and Ray be duplicated as necessary. You are directed to maintain thcse certifications at your activity for audit purposes. For pJrpcses of this certification sheet, the commander of the activity will begin the certification process and each reporting senior in the Chain of Cornand reviewing the information will also sign this certification sheet. i his sheet mst remain attached to this package and be fez-warded up the Chain of Coc~~nd.C0pi.e~ must be! retain& by each level in the Chain of Command for audit purgoses. I certify =he infamation contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belie:,

ACTIVITY COMElAEnER

THOMAS A. DAMES - GA~S(Pl~ase type-of print) Acting . Rear Admiral, CEC, USN -JUL 06 1994 Title Cat8 LANTNAVFACENGCOM - Act ivi tj? BRAC-95 CERTIFICATION

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Brown Name (Please type or print)

HL7-6 ..- ~)f Title Date . . Housing vision Division

es -t Department BRAC-95 CERTIFICATION

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

I. Richard Grindstaff Name (Please type or print) Signature

Head. Requirements & Acquisition Bran& 7 -C k ~f- Title Date .. Bousing D~vts~on. Division

es Management Department

-Activity BRAC-95 CERTIFICATION

1 certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief

Mark D. Raker Name (Please type or print) Signature

Housing Management Soecialist Title Date . .. Mouslne- Dlvlslon Division

Facilities Manwment Department

-Activity BRAC-95 CERTIFICATION

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Moses L. Meadows Name (Please type or print)

Director 7- c-FF/ Title Date . .. Housin? Dlvlslon Division ... acdihes M-ent Department

-Activity Document Separator DATA CALL 65 UIC: NO0245 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA

Activity Identification: Please complete the following table, identifying the activity for which this response is being submitted.

Activity Name: NAVAL STATION, SAN DIEGO, CA. UIC: NO0245 Major Claimant: CINCPACFLT

General Instructions/Background:

Information requested in this data call is required for use by the Base Structure Evaluation Committee (BSEC), in concert with information from other data calls, to analyze both the impact that potential closure or realignment actions would have on a local community and the impact that relocations of personnel would have on communities surrounding receiving activities. In addition to Cost of Base Realignment Actions (COBRA) analyses which incorporate standard Department of the Navy (DON) average cost factors, the BSEC will also be conducting more sophisticated economic and community infrastructure analyses requiring more precise, activity-specific data. For example, activity-specific salary rates are required to reflect differences in salary costs for activities with large concentrations of scientists and engineers and to address geographic differences in wage grade salary rates. Questions relating to "Community Infrastructure" are required to assist the BSEC in evaluating the ability of a community to absorb additional employees and functions as the result of relocation from a closing or realigning DON activity.

Due to the varied nature of potential sources which could be used to respond to the questions contained in this data call, a block appears after each question, requesting the identification of the source of data used to respond to the question. To complete this block, identify the source of the data provided, including the appropriate references for source documents, names and organizational titles of individuals providing information, etc. Completion of this "Source of Data" block is critical since some of the information requested may be available from a non-DoD source such as a published document from the local chamber of commerce, school board, etc. Certification of data obtained from a non-DoD source is then limited to certifying that the information contained in the data call response is an accurate and complete representation of the information obtained from the source. Records must be retained by the certifying official to clearly document the source of any non-DoD information submitted for this data call. DATA CALL 65 UIC: NO0245 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA

The following notes are provided to further define terms and methodologies used in this data call. Please ensure that responses consistently follow this guidance:

Note 1: Throughout this data call, the term "activity" is used to refer to the DON installation that is the addressee for the data call.

Note 2: Periodically throughout this data call, questions will include the statement that the response should refer to the "area defined in response to question l.b., (page 3)". Recognizing that in some large metropolitan areas employee residences may be scattered among many counties or states, the scope of the "area defined" may be limited to the sum of:

- those counties that contain government (DoD) housing units (as identified in l.b.2)), and,

- those counties closest to the activity which, in the aggregate, include the residences of 80% or more of the activity's employees.

Note 3: Responses to questions referring to "civilians" in this data call should reflect federal civil service appropriated fund employees. DATA CALL 65 UIC: NO0245 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFMSTRUCTURE DATA

1. Workforce Data

a. Average Federal Civilian Salary Rate. Provide the projected FY 1996 average gross annual appropriated fund civil service salary rate for the activity identified as the addressee in this data call. This rate should include all cash payments to employees, and exclude non-cash personnel benefits such as employer retirement contributions, payments to former employees, etc.

Average Appropriated Fund Civilian Salary Rate: $27,302.80

, Source of Data (La. Salary Rate): Navy Public Works Center Human Resources Office/Defense Civilian Personnel Data Service

b. Location of Residence. Complete the following table to identify where employees live. Data should reflect current workforce.

1) Residency Table. Identify residency data, by county, for both military and civilian (civil service) employees working at the installation (including, for example, operational units that are homeported or stationed at the installation). For each county listed, also provide the estimated average distance from the activity, in miles, of employee residences and the estimated average length of time to commute one-way to work. For the purposes of displaying data in the table, any county@) in which 1% or fewer of the activity's employees reside may be consolidated as a single line entry in the table, titled "Other". - County of Residence State No. of Employees Percentage Average Average Residing in of Distance Duration County Total From of Employees Base Commute Military Civilian (Miles) (Minutes)

SAN DIEGO CA 26,625) 1,3 87 99.96% I5 20

Other - R~verside/Imperial CA 11 1 .04% 55 80

As discussed in Note 2 on Page 2, subsequent questions in the data call refer to the "area defined in response to question l.b., (page 3)". In responding to these questions, the scope of the "area defined" may be limited to the sum of: a) those counties that contain government DATA4 CALL 65 UIC: NO0245 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA

(DoD) housing units (as identified below), and, b) those counties closest to the activity which, in the aggregate, include the residences of 80% or more of the activity's employees.

2) Location of Government (DoD) Housing. If some employees of the base live in government housing, identify the county(s) where government housing is located:

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

Source of Data (l.b. 1) & 2) Residence Data): COMNAVBASE San DiegoMCB Camp Pendleton h c. Nearest Metropolitan Area(s). Identify all major metropolitan area(s) (~.e., population concentrations of 100,000 or more people) which are within 50 miles of the installation. If no major metropolitan area is within 50 miles of the base, then identify the nearest major metropolitan area(s) (100,000 or more people) and its distance(s) from the base.

City County Distance from base (miles)

SAN DIEGO SAN DIEGO .2 CHCnA VISTA SAN DIEGO 3 OCEANSIDE SAN DIEGC) 4 1 ESCONDIDO SAN DIEGO 3 8 TIJUANA BAJA, MEXICO 15

Source of Data (1.c. Metro Areas): COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND LAND USEIGREATER SAN DIEGO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ECONOMIC BULLETIN, POPULATION AS OF JANUARY 1, 1994 DATA CALL 65 UIC: NO0245 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA

d. Age of Civilian Workforce. Complete the following table, identifying the age of the activity's civil service workforce. Age Category Number of Employees Percentage of Employees

16 - 19 Years 6 0.43 20 - 24 Years 4 1 2.95 25 - 34 Years 188 13.54 35 - 44 Years 3 99 28.75 45 - 54 Years 464 33.43 55 - 64 Years 272 19.60 65 or Older 18 1.30

TOTAL 1,388 100 % - 1

Source of Data (1.d.) Age Data): Navy Public Works Center Human Resources Office/Defense Civilian Personnel Data ServiceITenant Commands Personnel Files DATA CALL 65 UIC: NO0245 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA

e. Education Level of Civilian Workforce

1) Education Level Table. Complete the following table, identifying the education level of the activity's civil service workforce. Last School Year Number of Employees Percentage of Employees Com~leted

8th Grade or less 5 0.36 9th through 11th Grade 3 1 2.23 12th Grade or High 573 41 28 School Equivalency

1-3 Years of Coltege 460 33.14 4 Years of College (Bachelors Degree) 5 or More Years of College (Graduate Work) TOTAL 11 1,388 I 100 % 11 DATA CALL 65 UIC: NO0245 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA

2) Degrees Achieved. Complete the following table for the activity's civil service workforce. Identify the number of employees with each of the following degrees, etc. To avoid double counting, only identify the highest degree obtained by a worker (e.g., if an employee has both a Master's Degree and a Doctorate, only include the employee under the category "Doctorate"). Degree Number of Civilian Employees Terminal Occupation Program - Certificate 17 of Completion, Diploma or Equivalent (for areas such as technicians, craftsmen, artisans, skilled operators, etc.) Associate Degree 143 Bachelor Degree 2 15 Masters Degree 8 1 Doctorate 4

Source of Data (1,e.l) and 2) Education Level Data): Navy Public Works Center Human Resources Office/Defense Civilian Personnel Data ServiceITenant Commands Personnel Files

f. Civilian Employment By Industry. Complete the following table to identify by "industry" the type of work performed by civil service employees at the activity. The intent of this table is to attempt to stratify the activity civilian workforce using the same categories of industries used to identify private sector employment. Employees should be categorized based on their primary duties. Additional information on categorization of private sector employment by industry can be found in the Office of Management and Budget Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Manual. However, you do not need to obtain a copy of this publication to provide the data requested in this table. DAT.4 CALL 65 UIC: NO0245 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA

Note the followinn specific guidance regarding the "Industrv Type" codes in the first column of the table: Even though categories listed may not perfectly match the type of work performed by civilian employees, please attempt to assign each civilian employee to one of the "Industry Types" identified in the table. However, only use the Category 6, "Public Administration" sub-categories when none of the other categories apply. Retain su~~ortinq data used to construct this table at the activitv-level. in case auestions arise or additional information is required at some future time. Leave shaded areas blank. DATA CALL 65 UIC: NO0245 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA

Industry SIC No. of % of Codes Civilians Civilians

4e. Other Transportation Services (includes 47 4 0.29 organizational level maintenance)

4f. Communications 4 8 29 2.09 4g. Utilities 49 0 0 Sub-Total 4a. through 4g. ---. ---. 40-49 266 19.17 5. Services 70-89 5a. Lodging Services 70 0 0 5b. Personal Services (includes laundry and funeral services) 5c. Business Services (includes mail, security guards, pest control, photography, janitorial and ADP services) 5d. Automotive Repair and Services 5e. Other Misc. Repair Services 5f. Motion Pictures 5g. Amusement and Recreation Services 5h. Health Services 5i. Legal Services 5j. Educational Services 82 88 6.34 5k. Social Services 83 69 4.97 51. Museums 84 0 0 5m. Engineering, Accounting, Research Kr 87 44 3.17 Related Services (includes RDT&E., ISE, etc.) 5n. Other Misc. Services 89 178 12.82 Sub-Total 5a. through 5n.: 70-89 672 48.42 > L DATA CALL 65 UIC: NO0245 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA

Industry SIC No of % of Codes Civilians Civilians 6. Public Administration ---9 1-97 6a Executive and General Government. 9 1 144 10 38 Except Finance 6b Justice, Public Order & Safety (includes 92 224 16.14 police, firefighting and emergency management)

6c Public Finance 93 10 0 72 6d Environmental Quality and Housing 12 0 86 Programs -- Sub-Total 6a. through 6d. 3 90 28 10

TOTAL 1,388 100 %

Source of Data (1.f.) Classification By Industry Data): Navy Public Works Center Human Resources Office/Defense Civilian I'ersonnel Data ServiceITenant Commands Personnel Files DATA CALL 65 UIC: NO0245 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA

g. Civilian Employment by Occupation. Complete the following table to identify the types of "occupations" performed by civil service employees at the activity. Employees should be categorized based on their primary duties. Additional information on categorization of employment by occupation can be found in the Department of Labor Occupational Outlook Handbook. However, you do not need to obtain a copy of this publication to provide the data requested in this table.

Note the following s~ecificguidance regarding the "Occuvation Tvpe" codes in the first column of the table: Even though categories listed may not perfectly match the type of work performed by civilian employees, please attempt to assign each civilian employee to one of the "Occupation Types" identified in the table. Refer to the descriptions immediately following this table for more information on the various occuuational categories. Retain supporting data used to construct this table at: the activitv-level, in case auestions arise or additional information is required at some future time. Leave shaded areas blank.

Occupation Number of Percent of Civilian Civilian Employees Employees

1. Executive, Administrative and Management 116 8 36 2. Professional Specialty 2a Engineers 8 0 58 2b Architects and Surveyors 1 0 07 2c. Computer, Mathematical & Operations Research 20 1 44 2d Life Scientists 1 0 07 2e Physical Scientists 8 0 58 2f Lawyers and Judges 0 0 2g Social Scientists & Urban Planners 23 1 66 2h Social & Recreation Workers 53 3 82 2i Religious Workers 0 0 2j Teachers, Librarians & Counselors 7 0 50 2k Health Diagnosing Practitioners (Doctors) 0 0 21 Health Assessment & Treating(Nurses, Therapists, 3 0 22 Pharmacists, Nutritionists, etc ) .. DATA CALL 65 UIC: NO0245 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTUELE DATA

Occupation Civilian Civilian

2m Communications 20 1 44 2n Visual Arts 2 0 14 Sub-Total 2a. through 2n.: 146 10 52 3. Technicians and Related Support

3a Health Technologists and Technicians 10 0 72 3b Other Technologists 39 2 81 Sub-Total 3a. and 3b.: 49 3 53 4. Administrative Support & Clerical 365 26 30 5. Services 5a Protective Services (includes guards, firefighters, 219 15 78 police) 5b Food Preparation & Service 9 0 65 5c Dentalmedical AssistantsIAides 12 0.86 5d Personal Service & Building & Grounds Services 74 5 33 (includes janitorial, grounds maintenance, child care workers) Sub-Total 5a. through 5d. 3 14 22 62 6. Agricultural, Forestry & Fishing 0 0 7. Mechanics, Installers and Repairers 25 1 80 8. Construction Trades 17 1 22 9. Production Occupations 32 2 31 10. Transportation & Material Moving 20 1 44 11. Handlers, Equipment Cleaners, Helpers and Laborers 3 04 21 90 (not included elsewhere) TOTAL 1,388 100 % DATA CALL 65 UIC: NO0245 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTUIUZ DATA

Source of Data (1.g.) Classification By Occupation Data): Navy Public Works Center Human Resources OfficeDefense civilian I'ersonnel Data ServiceITer~antCommands Personnel Files 7 Descri~tionof Occuuational Categories used in Table 1.g. The following list identifies public and private sector occupations included in each of the major occupational categories used in the t*able. Refer to these examples as a guide in determining where to allocate guarouriated fund civil servicejobs at the activity.

1. Executive, Administrative and Management. Accountants and auditors; administrative services managers; budget analysts; construction and building inspectors; construction contractors and managers; cost estimators; education administrators; employment interviewers; engineering, science and data processing managers; financial managers; general managers and top executives; chief executives and legislators; health services managers; hotel managers and assistants; industrial production managers; inspectors and compliance officers, except construction; management analysts and consultants; marketing, advertising and public relations managers; personnel, training and labor relatio~tsspecialists and managers; property and real estate managers; purchasing agents and managers; restaurant and food service managers; underwriters; wholesale and retail buyers and merchandise managers.

2. Professional Specialty. Use sub-headings provided.

3. Technicians and Related Support. Health Technolonists and Technicians sub-category - self- explanatory. Other Technologists sub-category includes air& pilots; air traffic controllers; broadcast technicians; computer programmers; drafters; engineering technicians; library technicians; paralegals; science technicians; numerical control tool programmers.

4. Administrative Support & Clerical. Adjusters, investigators and collectors; b;mk tellers; clerical supervisors and managers; computer and peripheral equipment operators; credit clerks and authorizers; general office clerks; information clerks; mail clerks and messengers; material r~:cording, scheduling, dispatching and distributing; postal clerks and mail carriers; records clerks; secr1:taries; stenographers and court reporters; teacher aides; telephone, telegraph and teletype operators; typist!;, word processors and data entry keyers.

5. Services. Use sub-headings provided.

6. Agricultural, Forestry & Fishing. Self e~planiittory.

7. Mechanics, Installers and Repairers.Aircraft mechanics and engine specialists; automotive body repairers; automotive mechanics; diesel mechanics; electronic equipment repairas; elevator installers and repairers; farm equipment mechanics; general maintenance mechanics; heating, air conditioning and refrigeration technicians; home appliance and power tool repairers, industrial machinery repairers; line installers and cable splicers; millwrights; mobile heavy equipment mechanics; motorcycle, boat and small engine mechanics; musical instrument repairers and tuners; vending machine semicers and repairers.

8. Construction Trades. Bricklayers and stonemasons; carpenters; carpet installen;; concrete masons and terrazzo workers; drywall workers and lathers; electricians; glaziers; highway maintenance; insulation DATA CALL 65 UIC: NO0245 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTUIRE DATA

workers; painters and paperhangers; plasterers:,plumbers and pipefitters; roofers; sheet metal workers; structural and reinforcing ironworkers; tilesetters.

9. Production Occupations. Assemblers; food processing occupations; inspectors, testers and graders; metalworking and plastics-working occupations; plant and systems operators, jprinting occupations; textile, apparel and furnishings occupations; occupations; miscellaneou!; production operations.

10. Transportation & Material Moving. Busdrivers; material moving equipment operators; rail transportation occupations; truckdrivers; water transportation occupations.

11. Handlers, Equipment Cleaners, Helpers and Laborers (not included elsewhere). Entry level jobs not requiring significant training. DATA CALL 65 UIC: NO0245 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTUIRE DATA

h. Employment of Military Spouses. Complete the following table to provide estimated information concerning militam smuses who are also employed in the area defined in response to question l.b., above. Do not fill in shaded area

1. Percentage of Military Employees Who Are Married: 55.9

1) 2. Percentage- of Military- Spouses- Who Work Outside of the Home: ( 54.4 11 3. Break out of Spouses' Location of Employment (Total of rows 3a.. through 3d. should equal 100% and reflect the number of spouses used in the calculation of the "Percentage of Spouses Who Work Outside of the Home". 11 3a. Employed "On-Base" - Appropriated Fund: 7.8 11 3b. Employed "On-Base" - Non-Appropriated Fund: 1 43 I k. Employed "Off-Base" - Federal Employment: UI 11 3d. Employed "Off-Base" - Other Than Federal Employment 1 80.2 11

------Source of Data (1.h.) Spouse Employment Data): MESSAGE SURVEY TO ALL HOMEPORTED SHIPS, TENANT COMMANDS AND NAVAL ST.4TION DEPARTMENTS. DATA CALL 65 UIC: NO0245 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTUIW DATA

h. Employment of Military Spouses. Complete the following .table to provide estimated information concerning militarv snouses who are also employed,in the area defined in response to question l.b., above. Do not fill in shaded area. /' - 1. Percentage of Military Employees Who Are Married: See Note 1 2. Percentage of Military Spouses Who Work Outside o SEE NOTE 1 3. Break out of Spouses' Location of Employ through 3d. should equal 100% and reflect the in the calculation of the "Percentage of Spous the Home". 3a. Employed "On-Base" - Appropriated SEE NOTE 1 3b. Employed "On-Base" - Non-App SEE NOTE 1 3c. Employed "Off-Base" - Feder SEE NOTE 1 3d. Employed "Off-Base" - 0 SEE NOTE 1

NAVAL STATION TENANT COMMANDS. TIME

I Source of Data (1.h. pouse Employment Data): Not Available.

is completing the necessary survey to obtain the required spouse Change N4644- will be forwarded by CINCPACFLT as soon as it is received CPF -JUL 94 DATA CALL 65 UIC: NO0245 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY 1NFRASTRUCTU:RE DATA

2. Infrastructure Data. For each element of community infrastructure identified in the two tables below, rate the community's ability to accommodate the relocation of additional functions and personnel to your activity. Please complete each of the three columns listed in the table, reflecting the impact of various levels of increase (20%, 50%; and 100%) in the number of personnel working at the activity (and their associated families). In ranking each category, use one of the following three ratings:

A - Growth can be accommodated with little or no adverse impact to existing community infrastructure and at little or no additional expen:;e.

B - Growth can be accommodated, but will require some investrylent to improve and/or expand existing community infrastructure.

C - Growth either cannot be accommodated due to physical/environmental limitations or would require substantial investment in community infrastructure improvements.

Table 2.a., "Local Communities": This first table refers to the local community (i.e., the community in which the base is located) and its ability to meet the increased requirements of the installation.

Table 2.b., "Economic Region": This second table asks for an assessment of the infrastructure of the economic region (those counties identified in response to question 1.b., (page 3) - taken in the aggregate) and its ability to meet the needs of additional employees and their families moving into the area.

For both tables, annotate with an asterisk (*) any categories which are wholly supported on-base, i.e., are not provided by the local community. These categories should also receive an A-B-C rating. Answers for these "wholly supported on-base" categories should refer to base infrastructure rather than community infrastrncture. DATA CALL 65 UIC: NO0245 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTUIW DATA

a. Table A: Ability of the local communitv to meet the expanded needs of the base.

NOTE; All of the categories are not applicable as the service is provid.ed by the region not the community immediately outside the gate.

1) Using the A - B - C rating system described above, complete the table below.

SEE ABOVE NOTE

20% 501% 100% Category Increase Increase Increase Off-Base Housing NIA . Schools - Public 1 NIA 1 N/A N/ A Schools - Private NIA N/A NIA Public Transportation - Roadways I NIA 1 N/A I1 N/A 1 I I I II Public Transportation - BusesISubways NIA NIA NIA Public Transportation - Rail N/ A NIA N/ A Fire Protection I NIA 1 NIA 1 NIA I I I II Police NIA N/A NIA Health Care Facilities N/ A N/A N/ A Utilities: NIA NIA N/ A Water Supply NIA NIA NIA Water Distribution NIA NIA NIA Energy Supply NIA Energy Distribution N/ A NIA Wastewater Collection N/A N/ A N/A DATA CALL 65 UIC: NO0245 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTUIZE DATA

20% Category Increase Increase Increase

Wastewater Treatment LA NIA Storm Water Collection I N/A ~NIA pp/AII 11 Solid Waste Collection and Disposal I N/A 1 NIA 1 N/A I I I 1) Hazardous/Toxic Waste Disposal 1 N/A I N/A I N/A I I I II (1 Recreational Activities I N/A I N/A I N/A 11

Remember to mark with an asterisk any categories which are wholly supported on-base.

2) For each rating of "C" identified in the table on the preceding page, attach a brief narrative explanation of the types and magnitude of improvements required andlor the nature of any barriers that preclude expansion.

Source of Data (2.a. 1) & 2) - Local Community Table): 2 b. Table B: Ability of the region described in the resoonse to auestion 1.b. (oage 3J (taken in the aggregate) to meet the needs of additional employees and their families relocating into the area.

NOTE; For consistency, this is a regional response that considered a 2C1, 50 and 100% increase of the current total military and DOD civilian population (159,000 total) in San Diego County. The table is the ability of the civilian communitv to absorb the increases, it does not include the ability of the militarv communitv to absorb any increases (i.e. Health Care Facilities evaluation does not include the absorption ability of the existing Navy medical facilities). 1) Using the A - B - C rating system described above, complete the table below.

20% 501% 1 100% 1 Category Increase Increase Increase DATA CALL 65 UIC: NO0245 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTUIE DATA

Off-Base Housing C I IC IC Schools - Public I c I c I c Schools - Private I B I B I B Public Transportation - Roadways C C C Public Transportation - Buses/Subways A A A Public Transportation - Rail A A A Fire Protection C C C Police C Health Care Facilities C C Utilities: -- - Water Supply C Water Distribution A Energy Supply A B Energy Distribution A B Wastewater Collection C Wastewater Treatment C C Storm Water Collection C C Solid Waste Collection and Disposal C Hazardous/Toxic Waste Disposal C Recreation Facilities B B I I I .emember to mark with an asterisk any categories which are wholly supported on-base. DATA CALL 65 UIC: NO0245 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTUIXE DATA

2) For each rating of "C" identified in the table on the preceding page, attach a brief narrative explanation of the types and rnagnitude of improvement:s required and/or the nature of any barriers that preclude expansion.

GENERAL NOTES: Based on the current military and DOD civilian l~opulationof 158,000, a 20% increase is 31,600 people; a 50% increase is 79,000 people; and a 100% increase is 158,000 people.

The table rates are based on a six year absorption period. (5,666lyear ~bra 20% increase; 13,166iyear for a 50% increase; and 26,333iyear for a 100% increase.)

The ratings reflect maintaining the current Quality of Life that the San Diego region provides.

The ratings assume the military growth as being above the region's growth estimates of 50,000lyear over the next 20 years.

A basic economic development question facing the State of California and its local governments is the replacement of aging infrastructure and the development of new infrastructure to meet the new economic challenges. Recent state-wide referendums that would have increased infrastructure funding for recreation activities, earthquake retrofitting of highway bridges and eduction facilities were defeated. The State of California estimates that the State's annual deficit is $2 to $3 billion; the accumulated state deficit is estimated to be $9 billion.

At the local level, all local budgets have been. reduced and restricted by state requirements or local policies. Essential government services are being hard hit by the recession and budgetary constraints. State and local resources do not exist to support the anticipated population growth of the County of 1 million people in the next 20 years (50,0001year). In 1993, there was a net gain of 41,050 people in San Diego County.

Based on these elements the table is biased toward the C rating regardless of an increased military presence.

SPECIFIC COMMENTS ON C RATINGS:

Off Base Housing -- Large tracts of land are being held from deve1opmt:nt (much in planned development areas) due to endangered species concerns. An effort is underway to identify critical habitat throughout the county which when completed will open currently restricted DATA CALL 65 UIC: NO0245 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTUIE DATA lands to development. The continued poor economy is slowing the construction of new homes.

Schools - Public -- As mentioned above, essential government services are being hard hit by the recession and budgetary constraints. As can be seen from Question 3.b. 1, most school districts are at capacity and have been using trailers to accommodate student growth. New school infrastructure, teachers, etc. are needed.

Public Trans~ortation- Roadways -- Traffic throughout San Diego County is at Level of Service (LOS) C and D. Increases in population deteriorate the LOS. New highways are planned and construction is ongoing, but the new construction can not keep pace with the population growth.

Fire Protection -- As mentioned above, essential government services are being hard hit by the recession and budgetary constraints. Additional funding is required for more firefighters, equipment and stations.

Police -- As mentioned above, essential government services are being hard hit by the recession and budgetary constraints. Additional funding is required for more police.

Health Care Facilities -- As mentioned above, essential government services are being hard hit by the recesion and budgetary constraints. Again, the rating is based on. the civilian communitv providing this service. More facilities are needed.

Water Supplv -- California is dependent of water from snowmelt and the Colorado River. The overall population growth in California and in the other areas that clepend on these sources of water are overtapping these limited water sources. Several yc:ars of draught have resulted in water restrictions. Development of alternate water sources is needed.

Enerav Supplv -- No new energy producing plants are being built in Cajifornia. Development of new energy production sources, cooperative agreements with other utilities systems and infrastructure investment are needed.

Enerav Distribution -- continued development is impacting the existing clistribution network. Environmental concerns over high voltage trarlsmission lines is limiting :new construction. Infrastructure investment is needed. DATA CALL 65 UIC: NO0245 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY 1NFRASTRUCTU:RE DATA

Wastewater Collection -- An extensive program for collection and treatment is under way in most of San Diego County. This is a multi-billion dollar investment being born by the ratepayer and is due to non-compliance with the Clean Water Act. The system, once completed, will be sized for the anticipated population. Much of the existing collection system is old and needing repairlreplacement.

Wastewater Treatment -- An extensive program for collection and treatment is undenvay in most of San Diego County. This is a multi-billion dollar investment bl:ing born by the ratepayer and due to non-compliance with the Clean Water Act. The system, once completed, will be sized for the anticipated population.

Storm Water Collection -- During the spring rains, many areas flood due to undersized and inadequate storm water drains. Extensive development has "paved" over areas that used to absorb storm runoffs.

Solid Waste Collection and Disposal -- The existing landfills have finite lives and approvals for new landfills are years away. Extensive recycling programs and State mandated recycling goals will help reduce solid waste volume.

Hazardous/Toxic Waste Disposal -- No State facility exists for disposal of low level radioactive waste, landfills capable of accepting hazardous/toxic waste have finite lives. Hazardous/toxic waste minimizatiodelimination programs are necessary.

Source of Data (2.b. 1) & 2) - Regional Table): SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS 11 DATA CALL 65 UIC: NO0245 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY lNFRASTRUCTUIRE DATA

3. Public Facilities Data:

a. Off-Base Housing Availability. For the counties identified in the response to question 1.b. (page 3), in the aggregate, estimate the current average vacancy rate for community housing. Use current data or information identified on the latest family housing market analysis. For each of the categories listed (rental units and units for sale), combine single family homes, condominiums, townhouses, mobile homes, etc., into a single rate:

Rental Units: 1990 Census reports 58,837 vacant housing units in the San Diego area with a 6.0% vacancy rate.

Units for Sale: 1990 Census reports approximately 9,956 vacant units for sale, with 30,000 units currently listed on the market. 1.5% vacancy rate.

Source of Data (3.a. Off-Base Housing): San Diego Association of Governments 1990 Census Products Schedule March 2 1, 199 l/Family Housing Market Analysis Dated 12/92 by Robert D. Niehaus, Inc. DATA CALL 65 UIC: NO0245 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTUFLE DATA

b. Education.

1) Information is required on the current capacity and enrollment levels of school systems serving employees of the activity. Irlformation should be keyed to the counties identified in the response to question 1.b. (page 3).

THIS QUESTION WAS ANSWERED FOR SAN DIEGO COUNTY SCHOOLS ONLY. DATA CALL 65 UIC: NO0245 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTUIRE DATA - Encinitas Union San Diego 8 NIA NIA Elementary School District - Escondido Union San Diego 14 3 NIA Elementary School District

Fallbrook Union San Diego 6 1 NIA Elementary School District

Jamul-Dulzura Union San Diego 2 1 NIA Elementary School District

Julian Union Elementary San Diego 1 1 NIA School District - Lakeside Union San Diego 7 2 NIA Elementary School District - La Mesa-Spring Valley San Diego 18 -4 NIA II I I Lemon Grove Elementary San Diego 2 NIA II School District I 1 National Elementary San Diego NIA NIA School District

Pauma Elementary San Diego NIA NIA School District

Rancho Santa Fe San Diego 1 NIA Elementary School District

San Pasqual Union NIA NIA Elementary School I District - Santee Elementary San Diego 8 NIA School District I Solana Beach Elementary San Diego 4 NIA NIA School District

Spencer Valley San Diego 1 NIA NIA Elementary School District

Vallecitos Elementary San Diego 1 NIA NIA School District DAT.A CALL 65 UIC: NO0245 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA

Borrego Springs Unified San Diego 1 NIA 1 (7- 401 (1) School District 12)

Mountain Empire Unified San Diego 6 1 (7- 0 2,050 2,050 30 School District 12)

Oceanside Unified San Diego 15 3 3 18,072 18,072 30 35 Yes School District

Ramona Unified School San Diego 5 1 2 District

San Marcos Unified San Diego 7 1 3 10,300 10,067 31 135 !No School District

Vista Unified School San Diego 13 3 2 21,000 (1) District Carlsbad Unified School San Diego 7 1 2 6,706 6,706 32 1 35 No District

Coronado Unified School San Diego 2 1 1 2,400 (1) District Grossmont Union High San Diego I NIA I NIA 1 10 1 20,010 1 (I) I 311 I 32 I NO School District I

(1) District at or exceeding capacity. Schools could add trailers to increase capacity to handle overcrowding at the schools. This capacity changes rapidly as rooms are being converted from one type of class to another.

* Answer "Yes" in this column if the school district in question enrolls students who reside in government housing.

NOTE: 20 Schools have been built in San Diego County the past two years, 14 are under construction and 27 are planned for construction in the next five years according to the San DATi4 CALL 65 UIC: NO0245 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY 1NFRASTRUCTU:RE DATA

Diego County Department of Education. No information is available on the numbers of schools to be closed or the total increase of student enrollment.

Source of Data (3.b.l) Education Table): San Diego County DepartmentII of Education 2) Are there any on-base "Sec:tion 6" Schools? If so, identify number of schools and current enrollment.

NO SECTION 6 SCHOOLS ON ANY BASE IN SAN DIEGO COUNTY

Source of Data (3.b.2) On-Base Schools): COMNAVBASE San DiegoMCB Camp Pendleton

3) For the counties identified in the response to question 1.b. (page 3), in the aggregate, list the names of undergraduate and graduate colleges and un.iversities which offer certificates, Associate, Bachelor or Graduate degrees :

San Diego State University University of California San Diego a) Fifth College b) John Muir College c) Revelle College d) Third College e) Warren College San Diego Miramar College United States International University at San Diego San Diego Mesa College Grossmont College University of San Diego San Diego City College Point Loma College Cuyamaca College Christian Heritage College Southwestern College National University Palomar College Mira Costa College DATA CALL 65 UIC: NO0245 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTUIW DATA

California Western School of Law Western State University College of Law New School of Architecture California School of Professional Psychology Chapman College Charles H. Mason University William Lyon University The University for Humanistic Studies West Coast University La Jolla University Webster University La Jolla Academy of Advertising Arts University of Phoenix University of La Verne University of Redlands

Source of Data (3.b.3) Colleges): San Diego County Department of EducationPacific Bell Smart Yellow Pages San Diego M-Z March 1994 1 DATA CALL 65 UIC: NO0245 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTUIW DATA

4) For the counties identified in the response to question 1.b. (page 3), in the aggregate, list the names and major curriculums of vocational/technical training sc:hools:

American Business College Computerized Accounting, Administrative Secretary, Legal Secretary, Word Processing, Data Entry and Computer Training ABC Tech Centre City Automotive Technology, Air ConditioninglHeating & Refrigeration, Building Maintenance (Carpentry, Plumbing, Electrical), and Private Security ABC Tech Mission Gorge Drafting (AUTOCAD), Electronics, Digital, Microprocessor, Computer Tech San Diego College Medical Assistant, Pharmacy Technician, Registered Dental Assislant, Optical Technician, Medical Office Specialist Kelsey-Jenney Business College Accounting and Finance, Paralegal, Court Reporting, Managemenl/Sales & Marketing, Legal & Executive Secretarial, Computer Applications & Word PI-ocessing Platt College Computer Graphics, Graphic Design, Architectural or Electromechanical Drafting or Computer-Aided Drafting Concorde Career Institute Medical Assistant, Dental Assistant, Medical Office Management, Vocational Nurse (LVN), Paralegal, Computer Service Technician, Micro-Computer Operator Maric College of Medical Careers Medical Assistant, Medical Insurance, Iv[edical Receptionist, Medical Administration, Medical Transcriptionist, Licensed Vocational Nurse Design Institute of San Diego Interior Design Apollo College Medical Assistant, Medical Office Secretary, Computerized Medical Office Secretary, Electronics Technician, Legal Assistant, Computerized Office Systt:ms, and Hotel- Motel Management Century Schools Chef, Hotel & Restaurant Bartenders, Waiters & Waitresses, Paralegal, Legal Secretary, Bankteller, Word Processing/l'yping, Security OfficerBrivate Investigations Watterson College Pacific Court Reporting, Paralegal, Word Processing/Computer Specialist, 'Travel and DATA CALL 65 UIC: NO0245 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTUIXE DATA

Tourism, Security Professions, and Medical Assistant Pacific Coast College Computerized Accounting Specialist, Data Entry Specialist, Worcl Processing Specialist, Computerized Office Specialist, Legal Secretarial, Medical Receptionist, Vocational Nursing, and Nursing Assistant Academy of International Bartending Bartending DTI Institute Advertising Art, Computer Graphics/Desktop Publishing, and Dental Lab Technology Sawyer College of Business Computerized Accounting, Legal Secretary, Electronics Technician, Word Processor, Computer Operator, and Receptionist North Park College Word Processor, Administrative Assistant, Micro Computer Repair Technician, Para- Legal Assistant A.B. Institute Truckdriving Associated Tech College Telecommunications Balboa College Electrolysis, Bio-Chem Berlitz Language Center Languages Educational Cultural Complex Auto, Graphic Arts, Ind Eng Tech, Welding Eldorado College Clerical, Data Processing La Jolla Academy Drafting, Electronics

Source of Data (3.b.4) Vo-tech Training): San Diego County Department of EducationPacific Bell Smart Yellow Pages San Diego M-Z Mar 1994.

c. Transportation.

1) Is the activity served by public transportation?

Yes --No DAT,4 CALL 65 UIC: NO0245 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA

Bus: X - Rail: X - Subway: - -X Ferry: - X

Source of Data (3.c.l) Transportation): Area Maps/Naval Station Staff Civil Engineer Planning Division. - I11 I' 2) Identify the location of the nearest passenger railroad station (long distance rail service, not commuter service within a city) and the distance from the activity to the station. AMTRAC Station City of San Diego, CA. 3.8 miles.

Source of Data (3.c.2) Transportation): Area MapsPacific Bell YellowII Pages 3) Identify the name and location of the nearest commercial airport (with public carriers, e.g., USAIR, United, etc.) and the distance from the activity to the airport.

San Diego International Airport (Lindberg Field) City of San Diego, CA. 6.5 miles.

(1 Source of Data (3.~3)Transportation): Area MapsPacific Bell Yel.ow Pages 11 4) How many carriers are available at this airport?

13 major airlines and 4 commuters.

Source of Data (3.c.4) Transportation): San Diego International Airl~ort!Manager DATA CALL 65 UIC: NO0245 ECONOMIC AND C0MMU:NITY INFRASTRUCTUIRE DATA

5) What is the Interstate route number and distance, in mile:;, from the activity to the nearest Interstate highway?

Interstate 5. Less than one mile.

Source of Data (3.c.5) Transportation): Naval Station Staff Civil Engineer Planning Division

6) Access to Base:

a) Describe the quality and capacity of the road systems providing access to the base, specifically during peak periods. (Include both information on the area surrounding the base and information on access to the base, e.g., numbers of gates, congestion problems, etc.)

About 51,500 vehicles a day enter and exit Naval Station's west area artd 13,800 on the east area. The major streets are 8th St., 28th St., 32nd St., Wabash Ave. and Harbor Drive. During peak hours these streets carry about 1:3,000-18,000 vehicles. The west (Wet- Waterfront Industrial) area has 5 gates. The east (Dry-Training and Housing) area has 2 gates. The east (Brooklyn-Commercial and Family Support) area has tvro gates. With the heavy volumes of traffic we generate along with traffic from the National Steel & Shipbuilding Company (NASSCO) and other adjacent commercial activities, individuals must compete for the limited capacity of streets like Harbor Drive, 8th Street, 28th Street, 32nd Street and Main Street. Intense peak-hour traffic occurs as the two large traffic generators (NAVSTA and NASSCO) release large numbers of employees within a very short period of time. And, although three stations of the San Diego Trolley provide regional transit service to the base, the trolley contributes to travel delays because of frequent traffic interruptions.

Peak-hour congestion is very heavy at our main gate located at Harbor Drive and 32nd Street. Delays caused mainly by the trolley crossing on 32nd Street (approximately 20 feet north of the intersection) result in queued vehicles blocking the intersection for short periods of time. Existing congestion at Gate 9, Harbor Drive and 8th Street, is caused by the physical location of the gate, inadequate turning-lane storage and inefficient signal timing. Combined with the delays caused by the San Diego Trolley and the poor timing coordination with the 32nd Street and Harbor Drive traffic signal, the 32nd Street and Wabash Ave. interse:ction experiences substantial congestion in the peak hours. Peak-hour observations have shown that heavy westbound left turns on Main Street do not have adequate storage in the left-turn lane. Overflow from the lane impedes through traffic in the inside lane. The intersection formed by Main street, the southbound 1-5 Off-Ramp and Yama Street has the worst Level of Service DATA CALL 65 UIC: NO0245 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTUIRE DATA

of any individual intersection in the NAVSTA vicinity. Congestion at the intersection is mainly due to inadequate lane capacity.

b) Do access roads transit residential neighborhoods?

The primary access roads do not transit residential neighborhoods.

c) Are there any easements that preclude expansion of the access road system?

None that impede us from altering the road systems on base. It is unknown if easements exist off station which would preclude expansion.

d) Are there any man-made barriers that inhibit traffic flow (e.g., draw bridges, etc.)?

Yes - Railroad and Trolley Crossings.

Source of Data (3 .c.6) Transportation): Military Traffic Management Command Transportation Engineering Agency Report SE87-6a-38. Naval Station Staff Civil Engineer Planning Division.

d. Fire Protection/Hazardous Materials Incidents. Does the a.ctivity have an agreement with the local community for fire protection or hazardous materials incidents? Explain the nature of the agreement and identify the provider of the service.

Commander Naval Base San Diego (Federal Fire Department) provides Fire ProtectionRrevention and HAZ MAT response to the Navy and Marine Corps activities within San Diego County. Mutual AidIAutomatic ATd agreements are established to assist Federal Fire Department in the event Fire Protection assistance is required.

Source of Data (3.d. Fire/Hazmat): Federal Fire Department Fire (Chief1 DATA CALL 65 UIC: NO0245 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA

e. Police Protection.

1) What is the level of legislative jurisdiction held by the ir.stallation?

Propriatorial Exclusive Partial

2) If there is more than one level of legislative jurisdiction for installation property, provide a brief narrative description of the areas covered by each level of legislative jurisdiction and whether there are separate agreements for local law enforcement protection.

Proprietorial - Instances wherein the Federal Government has acquired ,some right or title to an area in a State, but has not obtained any measure of the State's auth'xity over the area.

Exclusive - When the Federal Government possesses, by whichever method acquired, all of the authority of the State, and in which the State concerned has not resr:rved to itself the right to exercise any of the authority concurrently .with the United States except the right to serve civil or criminal process in the area for activities which occurred outsidl: the area.

Partial - The Federal Government has been granted for exercise by it oLPeran area in a State certain of the state's authority, but where the State concerned has reserved to itself the right to exercise, by itself or concurrently with the United States, other authority constituting more than merely the right to serve civil or criminal process in the area.

3) Does the activity have a specific written agreement with local law enforcement concerning the provision of local police protection?

No. Local law enforcement agencies do not want a formal agreement.

4) If agreements exist with more than one local law enforcement entity, provide a brief narrative description of whom the agreement is with and what services are covered. DATA CALL 65 UIC: NO0245 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTUIm DATA

5) If military law enforcement officials are routinely augmented by officials of other federal agencies (BLM, Service, etc.), identify any written agreements covering such services and briefly describe the level of support received.

None.

-- - - - 71 1) Source of Data (3.e. 1) - 5) - Police): Naval Station Security Officer. DATA CALL 65 UIC: NO0245 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTUIIE DATA

f. Utilities.

1) Does the activity have an agreement with the local community for water, refuse disposal, power or any other utility requirements? Explain the nature of the agreement and identify the provider of the service.

Electricity and natural gas are provided by Sm Diego Gas and Electric Company. Steam is provided by private contractor - Sithe Energies USA (Applied Energy, Inc.) Water is provided by the City of San Diego. Sewer service is provided by the City of San Diego.

2) Has the activity been subject to water rationing or interrulption of delivery during the last five years? If so, identify time period during which rationing existed and the restrictions imposed. Were activity operations affected by these situations? If so, explain extent of impact.

3) Has the activity been subject to any other significant disruptions in utility service, e.g., electrical "brown outs", "rolling black outs", etc., during the last five years? If so, identify time period(s) covered and extentJnaturc: of restrictions/disruption. Were activity operations affected by these situations? If so, explain extent of impact.

11 Source of Data (3.f. 1) - 3) Utilities): Navv Public Works Center Utilities Department. 11 DAT,4 CALL 65 UIC: NO0245 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA

4. Business Profile. List the top ten employers in the geographic area defined by your response to question 1.b. (page 3), taken in the aggregate, (include your activity, if appropriate):

No. of Employer Product/Service Employees

1. Department of Navy Military Active Duty 122,000 Full-time Civilians 3 6,000 2. University of CA San Diego Education 17,000 3. San Diego County Public Service 13,000 4. San Diego Unified School District Public Service 13,000 5. City of San Diego Public Service 10,000 6. Sharp Healthcare 1 Medical 9,000 I 7. Martin Marietta Manufacturing 8. Scripps Memorial Hospitals Medical 9. State of California Public Service 10. U.S. Postal Service Mail Service 11. San Diego Community College Education District

NOTE 1: Martin Marietta purchased the assets of the General Dynamics Corporation in San Diego has announced the movement of most all jobs from the San Diego area. Source of Data (4. Business Profile): San Diego and Chula Vista Chamber of Commerces, Department of Navy, San Diego Association of Governments DATi4 CALL 65 UIC: NO0245 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA

5. Other Socio-Economic Impacts. For each of the following areas, describe other recent (past 5 years), on-going or projected emconomicimpacts (both positive and negative) on the geographic region defined by your response to question I .b. (page 3), in the aggregate:

a. Loss of Major Employers:

General Dynamics sold most of its interests rn San Diego and its successor Martin Marietta has announced that they will ceaselmove most all operations from San Diego. The remaining General Dynamics asset (Convair division) announced 1 July that they will ceaseoperation in 1996, the lost of 2,100 jobs. All aerospace industries in San Diego (General Dynamics, Martin Marietta and Rohr) have suffered dramatically from cutbacks in defense industries and aerospace.

b. Introduction of New Businesses/Technologies:

New business growths will be in the biotechnology, healthcare, computcxs and electronics, and telecommunications.

c. Natural Disasters:

No major disasters affecting San Diego County have occurred over the past 5 years. As was shown recently in Los Angeles, there is always a potential for earthquakes.

d. Overall Economic Trends:

The economy is slow in returning from the recession that is affecting Ciilifornia. The area continues to have a net increase of people, however the high paying jobs are being terminated or moved out of the area. Planners at the Sax) Diego Association of gokrernmentspredict an increase of 29,000 jobs per year till 2015.

Source of Data (5. Other SociofEcon): San Diego Association of Governments7 DATA CALL 65 UIC: NO0245 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTUIRE DATA

6. Other. Identify any contributions of your activity to the local community not discussed elsewhere in this response.

NONE Change N4644 - CP F JUL 94 Source of Data (6. Other): I BRAC-95 CERTIFICATION DATA CALL SIXTY FIVE

NAVSTA SAN DIEGO

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. MAJOR CLAIMANT LEVEL

R. J. KELLY NAME (Please type or print) Signature Commander In Chief sA-u49Lf Title Date

U. S. Pacific Fleet Activity

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

DEPUTY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS (LOGISTICS) DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF

J. B. GREENE,JR. NAME (Please type or print) ACTING 16 AUG 1994 Title Date BRAC 95 DATA CALL SIXTY FIVE NAVAL STATION SAN DIEGO

I certify that the information contained herein :is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. TYPE COMMANDER LEVEL

DATE: 7/

DATE : D. G. ROACH,d CAPT, CEC. USN -_7//g/7,- FORCE CIVIL.ENGINEER ' COMMANDER, NAVAL SURFACE FORCE, U.S. PACIFIC FLEET /dm* DATE :- RENE TREQINO FACILITIES PLANNER COMMANDER, NAVAL SURFACE FORCE, U.S. PACIFIC FLEET BRAC-95 DATA CALL NUMBER SIXTY FIVE CERTI1;ICATION

Reference: SECNAVNOTE 11000 of 08 December 1993

In accordance with policy set fotth by the Secretary of the Navy, persc~nnelof the Department of the Navy, uniformed and civilian, who provide information for use in the BRP,C-95 process are required to provide a signed certification that states "I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief."

The signing of this certification constitutes a representation that the certifying official has reviewed the information and either (1) personally vouches for its accuracy and comp1ete:ness or (2) has possession of, and is relying upon, a certification executed by a competent subordinate.

Each individual in your activity generating information for the BRAC-95 process must certify that information. Enclosure (1) is provided for individual certifications and may bc duplicated as necessary. You are directed to maintain those certifications at your activity for audit purposes. For purposes of this certification sheet, the commander of the activity will begin the certification process and each reporting senior in the Chain of Command reviewing the information will also sign this certification sheet. This sheet must remain attached to this package and be forwarded up the Chain of Command. Copies must be retained by each level in the Chain of Command for audit purposes.

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

ACTIVITY COMMANDER

M. K. COLLINS, CAPTAIN, USN NAME (Please type or print) Signature

COMMANDING OFFICER //a(& 9' Title Date

NAVAL STATION SAN DIEGO, CA. Activity

Enclosure (1) BRAC-95 DATA CALL NUMBER SlXTY FIVE: CERTIFICATION

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. n GEORGE N. WINNE'IT NAME (Please type or print) FACILITIES PLANNING DIRECTOR Title

CODE N4641 Division

STAFF CIVIL ENGINEER Depactment

NAVAL STATION SAN DIEGO, CA Activity BRAC 95 CEKTIf'IC~\'I'IOh DAT \ C/\l,i,21YrI'Y I'll l: ill:\ lSlO\ T 1 \A\iAI, 5'11\7'10\ SA\ I)lllCO

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the bus1 of my knowledge and belief. MAJOR CL

R. J. ZLATOPER.- NAME (Please type or print)

Commander Jn Chief /Z ~ufl95 'l'itie

.L. S. Pacific Fleet Activity

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and compiete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

DEPI'TY CHIEF OF NAVAL OF'ERATIONS (LOGISTICS) DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF (INSTALLATIONS & LOGISTICS)

N. A. EARNER ,-,

KAME (Please type or print) Signature , BRAC 95 DATA CALL SIXTY FIVE REVISION #1 NAVAL STATION SAN DIEGO I certify that the informatio:n contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. TYPE COMMANDER LEVEL

DEPUTY AND CHIEF OF STAFF COMMANDER, NAVAL SURFACE FORCE ,, U.S. PACIFIC FLEET

D. G. ROACH, CAPT, CEC. USN FORCE CIVIL.ENGINEER ' COMMANDER, NAVAL SURFACE FORCE, U.S. PACIFIC FLEET

DATE: 68 4 FACILITIES PLANNER COMMANDER, NAVAL SURFACE FORCE, U.S. PACIFIC FLEET BRAC-95 DATA CALL NUMBER SIXTY FI'G CERTl FICATION

Reference: SECNAVNOTE 11000 of 08 December 1993

In accordance with policy set forth by the Secretary of the Navy, personnel of the Department of the Navy, uniformed and civilian, who pmvide information for use in the BR4C-95 process are required to provide a signed certification that states "I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief."

The signing of this certification constitutes a representation that the certifying official has reviewed the information and either (1) personally vouches for its accuracy and completeness or (2) has possession of, and is relying upon, a certification executed by a competent subordinate.

Each individual in your activity generating information for the BRAC-95 process must certify that information. Enclosure (1) is provided for individual certifications and may be duplicated as necessary. You are dimted to maintain those certifications at your activity for audit puqsses. For purposes of this certification sheet, the commander of the activity will begin the certification process and each reporting senior in the Chain of Command reviewing the information will also sign this certification sheet. This sheet must remain attached to this package and be forwarded up the Chain 01' Command. Copies must be retained by each level in the Chain of Command for audit purposes.

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the Ixst of my knowledge and belief.

ACTIVITY COMMANDER M. K. COLLINS, CAPTAIN, USN 7%w&c NAME (Please type or print) Signature

COMMANDING OFFICER /b A&& ?(/ Title Date

NAVAL STATION SAN DIEGO, CA. Activity

Enclosure (1) BRAC-95 DATA CALL NUMBER SIXTY FIVE CERTIFICATION

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. f GEORGE N. WINNE'IT NAME (Please type or print) Signature FACILITIES PLANNING DIRECTOR Title

CODE N4641 Division

STAFF CIVIL ENGINEER Department

NAVAL STATION SAN DIEGO, CA Activity DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

Activity Information: Activity Name: MARS District, San Diego, CA UIC : N67796 Host Activity Name (if Naval Base San Diego, CA response is for a tenant activity): Host Activity UIC: NO0242

General Instructions/Background. A separate response to this data call must be completed for each Department of the Navy @ON) host, independent and tenant activity which separately budgets BOS costs (regardless of appropriation), u,is located in the United States, its territories or possessions.

1. Base Omrating Su~~ort(BOS) Cost D&a. Data is required which captures the total annual cost of operating and maintaining Department of the Navy (DCN) shore installations. Information must reflect FY 1996 budget data supporting the FY 1996 NAVCOMPT Budget Submit. Two tables are provided. Table 1A identifies "Other than DlBOF Overhead" BOS costs and Table 1B identifies "DBOF OverheadwBOS costs. These tables must be completed, as appropriate, for all DON host, independent or tenant aclivities which separately budget BOS costs (regardless of appropriation), d,are located in the United States, its territories or possessions. Responses for DBOF activities may need to include both Table 1A and 1B to ensure that all BOS costs, including those incturred by the activity in support of tenants, are identified. If both table 1A and 1B are submidted for a single DON activity, please ensure that no data is double counted (that is, included on both Table 1A and 1B). The following tables are designed to collect all BOS costs currently budgeted, regardless of appropriation, e.g ., Operations and Maintenance, Research and Development, Military Personnel, etc. Data must reflect FY 1996 and should be reported in thousands of dollars.

a. Table 1G - Base Operating Support Costs (Other Than DELOF Overhead). This Table should be completed to identify "Other Than DBOF Overhead" Costs. Display, in the format shown on the table, the O&M, R&D and MPN resources currently budgeted for BOS services. O&M cost data must be consistent with data providttd on the BS-1 exhibit. Report only direct funding for the activity. Host activities shc~uldnot include reimbursable support provided to tenants, since tenants will be separately reporting these costs. Military personnel costs should be included on the appropriate ljnes of the table. Please ensure that individual lines of the table do not include duplicate (costs. Add additional lines to the table (following line 2j., as necessary, to identify any additional cost elements not currently shown). Leave shaded areas of table blank. DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

11 Table 1A - Base Operating Support Costs (Other Than DBOF Overhead) 11 Activity Name: MARS District, San Diego, CA

r I FY 1996 BOS Costs ($000) Category l-~l ( 1. Real Property Maintenance Cwts: 1 la. Maintenance and Repair 1b. Minor Construction lc. Sub-total la. and lb. 2. Other Base Operating Support Costs: Il DATA CALL 66 INSTALLA'nON RESOURCES

b. Funding Source. If data shown on Table 1A reflects more than one appropriation, then please provide a break out of the total shown for the "3. Grand-Totalwline, by appropriation:

Appro~riation Amount ~$000)

c. Table 1B - Base Operating Support Costs @BOF Overhead). This Table should be submitted for all current DBOF activities. Costs reported should reflect BOS costs supporting the DBOF activity itself (usually included in the G&A cost of the activity). For DBOF activities which are tenants on another installation, total cost of BOS incurred by the tenant activity for itself should be shown on this table. It is recognized that differences exist among DBOF activity groups regarding the costing of base operating :support: some groups reflect all such costs only in general and administrative (G&A), while others spread them between G&A and production overhead. Regardless of the costing prcxess, all such costs should be included on Table 1B. The Minor Construction portion of the FY 1996 capital budget should be included on the appropriate line. Military personnel costs (at civilian equivalency rates) should also be included on the appropriate lines of Ihe table. Please ensure that individual lines of the table do not include duplicate costs. Also ensure that there is no duplication between data provided on Table 1A. and 1B. These two tables must be mutually exclusive, since in those cases where both tables are submitted for an activity, the two tables will be added together to estimate total BOS costs at the activity. Add additional lines to the table (following line 21., as necessary, to identify any additional cost elements not currently shown). Leave shaded areas of table blank,

Other Notes: All costs of operating the five Major Range Test Facility Bases at DBOF activities (even if direct RDT&E funded) should be included on Table 1B. Weapon Stations should include underutilized plant capacity costs as a DBOF overhead "BOS expense" on Table 1B.. DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

Table 1B - Base Operating Support Costs @BOF Ovtxhead) I I Activity Name: MARS District, San Diego, CA 1 UIC: N67796 11 I FY 19% Net Cost From UC&\ kJI Category 1 Non-Labor I labor 1 Total 11 I 1. Real Roprtg Maintenance Costs: 1 1 I la. Real Property Maintenance (>$15K) 1) lb. Real Property Maintenance (< $15K) (1 lc. Minor Construction (Expensed) 1 1 I Id. Minor Construction (Capital Budget) 41 11 lc. Sub-total la. through- Id. I I I 11 2. Other Base Operating Support Costs: 2a. Command Office 2b. ADP Support 2c. Equipment Maintenance 2d. Civilian Personnel Services 2e. Accounting/Finance 2f. Utilities 2g. Environmental Compliance 2h. Police and Fire 2i. Safety 2j. Supply and Storage Operations 2k. Major Range Test Facility Base Costs 21. Other (Specify) 2m. Sub-total 2a. through 21:

4. Grand Total (sum of lc.. 2m.. and 3.) : I 0 1 0 1 0 11 DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

2. ServicesfSu~~liesCost Data. The purpose of Table 2 is to provide information about projected FY 1996 costs for the purchase of services and supplies by the activity. (Note: Unlike Question 1 and Tables 1A and lB, above, this question is not limited to overhead costs.) The source for this information, where possible, should be either the NAVCOMPT OP-32 Budget Exhibit for O&M activities or the NAVCOMPT UCIFUND-11IF-4 exhibit for DBOF activities. Information must reflect FY 1996 budget data supporting the FY 1996 NAVCOMPT Budget Submit. Break out cost data by the major sub-.headings identified on the OP-32 or UCIFUND-l/IF-4 exhibit, disregarding the sub-headings on the exhibit which apply to civilian and military salary costs and depreciation. Please note that while the OP-32 exhibit aggregates information by budget activity, this data call requests OP-32 data for the activity responding to the data call. Refer to NAVCOMPTINST 7102.2B of 23 April 1990, Subj: Guidance for the Preparation, Submission and Review of the Clepartment of the Navy (DON) Budget Estimates @ON Budget Gui.dance Manual) with Changes 1 and 2 for more information on categories of costs identified. Any rows that do not apply to your activity may be left blank. However, totals reported should reflect all costs, t:xclusive of salary and depreciation.

Table 2 - ServicesISupplies Cost Data 1 Activity Name: MARS District, San Diego

FY 1996 Cost Category Projected Costs

Travel: 1.O Material and Supplies (including equipment): Industrial Fund Purchases (other DBOF purchases): Transportation: Other Purchases (Contract support, etc.): (Maintflease) .7 Total: 1.7 DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

3. Contractor Workvea~.

a. On-Base Contract Workyear Table. Provide a projected estimate of the number of contract workyears expected to be performed 'on baseMin support of the installation during FY 1996. Information should represent an annual estimate on a full-time equivalency basis. Several categories of contract support have been identified in the table below. While some of the categories are self-explanatory, please note that the category "mission support" entails management support, labor service and other mission support contracting efforts, e.g., aircraft maintenance, RDT&E support, technical services in support c~faircraft and ships, etc. N/A

Table 3 - Contract Workyears ( Activity Name: 1 UIC:

- IT 1996 Estimated Number of Contract Type Workyeam On-Base Construction: I Facilities Support: I Mission Support: I Procurement : I

I Total Workyeam: I

* Note: Provide a brief narrative description of the type(s) of contract:$,if any, included under the "Other" category. DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

b. Potential Disposition of On-Base Contract Workyears. [f the mission/functions of your activity were relocated to another site, what would be the anticipated disposition of the on-base contract workveaq identified in Table 3.?

1) Estimated number of contract workyears which would be transferred to the receiving siy (This number should reflect the number of jabs which would in the future be contracted for at the receiving site, not an estimate of the number of people who would move or an indication that work would necessarily be done by the same contractor(s)):

2) Estimated number of workvears which would be eliminald:

NIA

3) Estimated number of contract workyears which would rernain in ~las(i.e., contract would remain in place in current location even if activity were relocated outside of the local area): DATA CALL 66 INSTALLA'rION RESOURCES

c. "Off-Base"Contract Workyear Data. Are there any contract workyears located in the local community, but not on-base, which would either be elimiinated or relocated if your activity were to be closed or relocated? If so, then provide the following information (ensure that numbers reported below do not double count numbelm included in 3.a. and 3.b., above):

No. of Additional Contract Workyears General Type of Work Performed on Contract (e.g., Which Would Be engineering support, technical services, etc.) Eliminated

0 1

No. of Additional Contract Workyears General Type of Work Performed cbn Contract (e.g., Which Would Be engineering support, technical services, etc.) Relocated INSTALLATION RESOURCES, DATA CALL 66 for COMNA'VCOMTELCOM

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the: best of my knowledge and belief. NEXT ECHELON LEVEL (if applicable)

NAME (Please type or print) Signature

Title Date

Activity

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. NEXT ECHELON LEVEL (if applicable)

Name (Please type or print) Signature ...... Title Date

Activity

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. MAJOR CLAIMANT LEVEL

T. A. STARK Name (Please type or print) Commander, 25 AUP 1994 Title Date Naval Computer and Telecommunications Command Activity

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the 'best of my knowledge and belief. DEPUTY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS (LOGISTICS) DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF (INSTALLATI b. A. EARNER NAME (Please type or print) Signature , , 1

Date DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

Activity Information: Activity Name: Naval Telecommunications Center (NTCC), San Diego, CA

Host Activity Name (if Commander, Naval Base, San Diego response is for a tenant activity) : Host Activity UIC: NO0242

General Instructions/Background. A separate response to this data c;dl must be completed for each Department of the Navy @ON) host, independent and tenant activity which separately budgets BOS costs (regardless of appropriation), A,is lo~itedin the United States, its territories or possessions.

1. Base O~eratineSu~~ort (BOS) Cost Data. Data is required which captures the total annual cost of operating and maintaining Department of the Navy (DON) shore installations. Information must reflect FY 1996 budget data supporting the FY 1996 NAVCOMPT Budget Submit. Two tables are provided. Table 1A identifies "Other than DEIOF Overhead" BOS costs and Table 1B identifies "DBOF Overhead" BOS costs. These tables must be completed, as appropriate, for all DON host, independent or tenant activities which separately budget BOS costs (regardless of appropriation), a,are located in the United States, its territories or possessions. Responses for DBOF activities mily need to include both Table 1A and 1B to ensure that all BOS costs, including those incurred by' the activity in support of tenants, are identified. If both table 1A and 1B are subrni~rtedfor a single DON activity, please ensure that no data is double counted (that is, included cw bQth Table 1A and 1B). The following tables are designed to collect all BOS costs currently budgeted, regardless of appropriation, e.g., Operations and Maintenance, Research and Development, Military Personnel, etc. Data must reflect FY 1996 and should be reported in thousands of dollars.

a. Table 1A - Base Operating Support Costs (Other Than DBOF Overhead). This Table should be completed to identify "Other Than DBOF Overhead" Costs. Display, in the format shown on the table, the O&M, R&D and MPN resources currently budgeted for BOS services. O&M cost data must be consistent with data providei on the BS-1 exhibit. Report only direct funding for the activity. Host activities should not include reimbursable support provided to tenants, since tenants will be separately reporting these costs. Military personnel costs should be included on the appropriate lines of the table. Please ensure that individual lines of the table do not include duplicate costs. Add additional

DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

b. Funding Source. If data shown on Table 1A reflects more than one appropriation, then please provide a break out of the total shown for the "3. Grand-'rotal" line, by appropriation:

Approvriation Amount ($000)

c. Table 1B - Base Operating Support Costs (DBOF Overhard). This Table should be submitted for all current DBOF activities. Costs reported sllould reflect BOS costs supporting the DBOF activity itself (usually included in the G&A cost of the activity). For DBOF activities which are tenants on another installation, total cost of BOS incurred by the tenant activity for itself should be shown on this table. It is recogniml that differences exist among DBOF activity groups regarding the costing of base operating support: some groups reflect all such costs only in general and administrative (G&A), while others spread them between G&A and production overhead. Regardless of the costing process, all such costs should be included on Table 1B. The Minor Construction portion of the FY 1996 capital budget should be included on the appropriate line. Military personnel costs (at civilian equivalency rates) should also be included on the appropriate lines of the table. Please ensure that individual lines of the table do not include duplicate costs. Also ensure that there is no duplication between data provided on Table 1A. and 1B. These two tables must be mutually exclusive, since in those cases where both tables are submittal for an activity, the two tables will be added together to estimate total BOS costs at the activity. Add additional lines to the table (following line 21., as necessary, to identify any additional cost elements not currently shown). Leave shaded areas of table blank,

Other Notes: All costs of operating the five Major Range Test Facility Bases at DBOF activities (even if direct RDT&E funded) should be included on Table 1B. Weapon Stations should include underutilized plant capacity costs as a DBOF overhead "BOS expense" on Table 1B.. DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

Table 1B - Base Operating Support Costs (DBOF Overhead) I I 1 11 Activity Name: NTCC SAN DIEGO, CA ( UIC: 47638 11

FY 1996 Net Cust F'mm UCIFUND-4 ($000) Category l*ImII I 1. Real Property Maintenance Costs: I 1 la. Real Propew Maintenance ( > SISK) I I 11 lb. Real Property Maintenance (< S15K) I I lc. Minor Construction (Expensed) 1 id. Minor Construction (Capital Budget) I I I( lc. Sub-total la. through- Id. I I I 2. Other Base Operating Support Costs:

1 3. Depredation I 4. Grand Total (sum of lc., 2m., and 3.) : 0 DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

2. ServicesISu~~liesCost Data. The purpose of Table 2 is to provide information about projected FY 1996 costs for the purchase of services and supplies by the activity. (Note: Unlike Question 1 and Tables 1A and lB, above, this question is not limited to overhead costs.) The source for this information, where possible, should be eilher the NAVCOMPT OP-32 Budget Exhibit for O&M activities or the NAVCOMPT UCIFlITND-1IIF-4 exhibit for DBOF activities. Information must reflect FY 1996 budget data suppxting the FY 1996 NAVCOMPT Budget Submit. Break out cost data by the major sub-headings identified on the OP-32 or UCIFUND- 1IIF-4 exhibit, disregarding the sub-headings on the exhibit which apply to civilian and military salary costs and depreciation. Please note that while the OP-32 exhibit aggregates information by budget activity, this data call requests OP-32 data for the activity responding to the data call. Refer to NAVCOMPTINST 7102.2B of 23 April 1990, Subj: Guidance for the Preparation, Submission and Review of the Department of the Navy (DON) Budget Estimates @ON Budget Guidance Manual) with Changes 1 and 2 for more information on categories of costs identified., Any rows that do not apply to your activity may be left blank. However, totals reported should reflect all costs, e~clusiveof salary and depreciation.

Table 2 - ServicesISupplies Cost Data

Activity Name: NTCC SAN DIEGO, CA

Cost Category

Travel: Material and Supplies (including equipment): Industrial Fund Purchases (other DBOF purchases): Transportation: Other Purchases (Contract support, etc.): Total: DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

3. Contractor Workvears.

a. On-Base Contract Workyear Table. Provide a projected estimate of the number of contract workyears expected to be performed "on basen in support of the installation during FY 1996. Information should represent an annual estimate on a full-time equivalency basis. Several categories of contract support have been identified in the table below. While some of the categories are self-explanatory, please note that the category "mission support" entails management support, labor service and other mission support contracting efforts, e.g., aircraft maintenance, RDT&E support, technical services in support of' aircraft and ships, etc. N/A

Table 3 - Contract Workyears 11 Activity Name: NTCC SAN DIEGO, CA 1 C:47638 EY 1996 Estimated Number of Contract Type Workyears On-Base Construction: 1 Facilities Support: 1 Mission Support: ! Procurement: I other: * I Total Workyears: I 0 11

* Note: Provide a brief narrative description of the type(s) of contracts, if any, included under the * Otherwcategory. DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

b. Potential Disposition of On-Base Contract Workyears. If the mission/functions of your activity were relocated to another site, what would be the anticipated disposition of the on-base contract workvean identified in Table 3.?

1) Estimated number of contract worlqears which would be transferred to the receiving site (This number should reflect the number of jobs which would in the future be contracted for at the receiving site, not an estimate of the number of people who would move or an indication that work would necessarily be done by the same contractor(s)):

2) Estimated number of workyears which would be eliminatcd:

3) Estimated number of contract workyears which would rerrrain in lace (i.e., contract would remain in place in current location even if activity were relocated outside of the local area): DAT.A CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

c. ftOff-BasettContract Workyear Data. Are there any contract workyears located in the community, but not on-base, which would either be elimi~latedor relocated if your activity were to be closed or relocated? If so, then provide the fbllowing information (ensure that numbers reported below do not double count numbens included in 3.a. and 3.b., above):

No. of Additional Contract Workyears General Type of Work Performed ca Contract (e.g., Which Would Be engineering support, technical services, etc.) Eliminated

No. of Additional Contract Workyears General Type of Work Performed 0x1 Contract (e.g., Which Would Be engineering support, technical services, etc.) Relocated INSTALLATION RESOURCES, DATA CALL 66 for COMNA.VCOMTELCO&I

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. NEXT ECHELON LEVEL, (if applicable)

NAME (Please type or print) .I Signature

Title Date

Activity

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. NEXT ECHELON LEV- (if applicable)

Name (Please type or print) Signature

------.------Title Date

Activity

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. MAJOR CLAIMANT LEVEL

T. A. STARK Name (Please type or print) Commander, 25 AUP 1994 Title Date Naval Computer and Teiecommunications Command Activity

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. DEPUTY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS (LOGIS'IICS) DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF' (INSTALLATIONS b. A. EARNEX AT NAME please type or print)

Title Date DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

Activity Information: Activity Name: CMIOIFES UIC: 32680 Host Activity Name (if Naval Station San Diego, CA response is for a tenant activity): Host Activity UIC: 00245

General InstructionsIBackground. A separate response to this data call must be completed for each Department of the Navy (DON) host, independent and tenant i~ctivitywhich separately budgets BOS costs (regardless of appropriation), a,is located in the United States, its territories or possessions.

1. Base O~eratin~Su~~ort CBOS) Cost Data. Data is required which captures the total annual cost of operating and maintaining Department of the Navy (DON) shore installations. Information must reflect FY 1996 budget data supporting the FY 1996 .NAVCOMPT Budget Submit. Two tables are provided. Table 1A identifies "Other than DBOF Overhead" BOS costs and Table 1B identifies "DBOF Overhead" BOS costs. These tab:les must be completed, as appropriate, for all DON host, independent or tenant activities which separately budget BOS costs (regardless of appropriation), a,are located in the United States, its territories or possessions. Responses for DBOF activities may need to include both Table 1A and 1B to ensure that all BOS costs, including those incurred by the activity in support of tenants, are identified. If both table 1A and 1B are submitted for a single DON activity, please ensure that no data is double counted (that is, included on bQth Table 1A and 1B). The following tables are designed to collect all BOS costs currently budgeted, regardless of appropriation, e.g., Operations and Maintenance, Research. and Development, Military Personnel, etc. Data must reflect FY 1996 and should be reported in thousands of dollars. a. Table 1A - Base Operating Support Costs (Other Than DBOF Overhead). This Table should be completed to identify "Other Than DBOF Overhead" Costs. Display, in the format shown on the table, the O&M, R&D and MPN resources currently budgeted for BOS services. O&M cost data must be consistent with data provided on the BS-1 exhibit. Report only direct funding for the activity. Host activities should not include reimbursable support provided to tenants, since tenants will be separately reporting these costs. Military personnel costs should be included on the appropriate lines of the table. Please ensure that individual lines of the table do not include duplicate costs. Add additional lines to the table (following line 2j., as necessary, to identify any additional cost elements not currently shown). Leave shaded areas of table blank, DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

I Table 1A - Base Operating Support Costs (Other Than DBOF Overhead) 1) Activity Name: CMIOIFES N 1996 BOS Costs ($000) Category I Total ( 1. Real Property Maintenance Costs: L la. Maintenance and Repair 4.2 1b . Minor Construction 11 If. Sub-total la. and lb. I 4.2 1 2. Other Base Operating Support Costs:

2k. Subtotal 2a. through 23: I 57.4 ! 57.4 11I 3. Grand Total (sum of lc. and 2k.l: I 61.6 1 I 61.6 DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

b. Funding Source. If data shown on Table 1A reflects more than one appropriation, then please provide a break out of the total shown for the "3. Grand-'l'otal" line, by appropriation:

Appro~riation Amount ($000)

c. Table 1B - Base Operating Support Costs (DBOF Overhead). This Table should be submitted for all current DBOF activities. Costs reported shiould reflect BOS costs supporting the DBOF activity itself (usually included in the G&A cost of the activity). For DBOF activities which are tenants on another installation, total cost of BOS incurred by the tenant activity for itself should be shown on this table. It is recognized that differences exist among DBOF activity groups regarding the costing of base operating support: some groups reflect all such costs only in general and administrative (G&A), while others spread them between G&A and production overhead. Regardless of the costing process, all such costs should be included on Table 1B. The Minor Construction portion of the FY 1996 capital budget should be included on the appropriate line. Military personnel costs (at civilian equivalency rates) should also be included on the appropriate lines of the table. Please ensure that individual lines of the table do not include duplicate costs. Also ensure that there is no duplication between data provided on Table 1A. and 1B. These two tables must be mutually exclusive, since in those cases where both tables are submittal for an activity, the two tables will be added together to estimate total BOS costs at the activity. Add additional lines to the table (following line 21., as necessary, to identify any additional cost elements not currently shown). Leave shaded areas of table blank,

Other Notes: All costs of operating the five Major Range Test Facility Bases at DBOF activities (even if direct RDT&E funded) should be included on Table 1B. Weapon Stations should include underutilized plant capacity costs as a DBOF overhead "BOS expense" on Table 1B.. DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

11 Table 1B - Base Operating Support Costs (DBOF Overhead) 11 11 Activity Name: CMIO/FES 1 UIC: 32680 11

FY 1996 Net Cost Rum UCIFUND-4 ($000) Category I~Lrnl I 1. Real Property Maintenance Costs: &I 11 la. Real Property Maintenance (>S15K) I I Il lb. Real Property Maintenance ( < $15K) 1c. Minor Construction (Expensed) Id. Minor Construction (Capital Budget) lc. Sub-total la. through- Id. 2. Other Base Operating Support Costs: 2a. Command Office 2b. ADP Support 2c. Equipment Maintenance 2d. Civilian Personnel Services 2e. Accounting/Finance 2f. Utilities 2g. Environmental Compliance 2h. Police and Fire 2i. Safety 2j. Supply and Storage Operations 2k. Major Range Test Facility Base Costs I _I-21. Other (Specify) 2m. Sub-total 2a. through 21: I I I 11 3. Depreciation

4. Grand Total (sum of lc., 2m., and 3.) : 0 DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

2. Services/Su~~liesCost Data. The purpose of Table 2 is to provide information about projected FY 19% costs for the purchase of services and supplies by the activity. (Note: Unlike Question 1 and Tables 1A and lB, above, this question is not limited to overhead costs.) The source for this information, where possible, should be either the NAVCOMPT OP-32 Budget Exhibit for O&M activities or the NAVCOMPT UCIFIJND-11IF-4 exhibit for DBOF activities. Information must reflect FY 1996 budget data supporting the FY 1996 NAVCOMPT Budget Submit. Break out cost data by the major sub-headings identified on the OP-32 or UCIFUND-l/IF-4 exhibit, disregarding the sub-headings on the exhibit which apply to civilian and military salary costs and depreciation. Please nolte that while the OP-32 exhibit aggregates information by budget activity, this data call requesls OP-32 data for the activity responding to the data call. Refer to NAVCOMPTINST 7102.2B of 23 April 1990, Subj: Guidance for the Preparation, Submission and Review of the Dt:partment of the Navy (DON) Budget Estimates (DON Budget Guidance Manual) with Changes 1 and 2 for more information on categories of costs identified. Any rows that do not apply to your activity may be left blank. However, totals reported should reflect all costs, erclusive of salary and depreciation.

Cost Category DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

3. Contractor Workyea-.

a. On-Base Contract Workyear Table. Provide a projected estimate of the number of contract workyears expected to be performed "on base" in support of the installation during FY 1996. Information should represent an annual estimate on a full-time equivalency basis. Several categories of contract support have been identified in the table below. While some of the categories are self-explanatory, please note that the category "mission support" entails management support, labor service and other mission support contracting efforts, e.g., aircraft maintenance, RDT&E support, technical services in support of aircraft and ships, etc. NIA Table 3 - Contract Workyears + Activity Name: CMIOIFES UIC': 32680

- Number of 1 Contract Type I WorLyears On-Base 1 I! I 11 construction: ! II 11 Facilities Support: IMission Support: II Procurement: Other: * Total Workyeam: 0

* Note: Provide a brief narrative description of the type(s) of contracts, if any, included under the "Other" category. DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

b. Potential Disposition of On-Base Contract Workyears. If the mission/functions of your activity were relocated to another site, what would be the anlicipated disposition of the on-base contract workveae identified in Table 3.?

1) Estimated number of contract workyears which would br;: transferred to the receiving site (This number should reflect the number of jobs which would in the future be contracted for at the receiving site, not an estimate of the number of people who would move or an indication that work would necessarily be done by the same contractor(s)):

2) Estimated number of workvears which would be eliminat~a:

3) Estimated number of contract workyears which would remain in u1a (i.e., contract would remain in place in current location even if activity were relocated outside of the local area): DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

c. nOff-BasenContract Workyear Data. Are there any conbract workyears located in the community, but not on-base, which would either be eliminated or relocated if your activity were to be closed or relocated? If so, then provide the following information (ensure that numbers reported below do not double count numbe~sincluded in 3.a. and 3.b., above):

No. of Additional Contract Workyears General 'Type of Work Performed on Contract (e.g., Which Would Be engineering support, technical services, etc.) Eliminated

No. of Additional Contract Workyears General Type of Work Performed on Contract (e.g., Which Would Be engineering support, technical wrvices, etc.) Relocated INSTALLATION RESOURCES, DATA CALL 66 for COMNPLVCOMTELCOI\I

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. NEXT ECHELON LEVEL (if applicable)

NAME (Please type or print) .I Signature

Title Date

Activity

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to tha best of my knowledge and belief. -ECHELON -ECHELON (if applicable)

Name (Please type or print) Signature ...... Title Date

Activity

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to tho best of my howledge and belief.

T. A. STARK Name (Please type or print) Commander, 25 Aue 1994 Title Date Naval Computer and Telecommunications Command Activity

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. DEPUTY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS (LOGISTICS) DEPUTY CHIEF OF STM(INSTALLATI b. A. EARNER NAME (Please type or print)

Title Date Document Separator DA'TA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

Activity Infol-rnation:

Activity Name: DO San Diego

Host Activity Name (if Naval Station San Diego response is for a tenant activity1: I/ Host Activity UIC: 00245 1/ DATA CALL 66 INSTALLXIION RESOURCES

I Table 1A - Base Operating Support Costs (Other Than DlBOF Overhead) I II Activity Name: Defense Printing Service 1 Ul:C: Wr &'A' 7706 11 FY 1996 BOS Costs ($000) Category ILabor I. Total 11 I

1. Real Property Maintenance Costs: la. Maintenance and Repair I I I 11 lb. Minor Construction I - -- - - lc. Sub-total la. and lb. I 2. Other Base Operating Support Costs: 2a. Utilities 2b. Transportation - - 2c. Environmental 2d. Facility Leases 2e. Morale, Welfare & Recreation 2f. Bachelor Quarters 2g. Child Care Centers -21 2h. Family Service Centers I I 2i. Administration I I I 11 2j. Other (Specify) -1 2k. Sub-total 2a. through 23': I I I 11 3. Grand Total (sum of lc. and 2k.): I1 .NI/A: (DPS is DBOF)

.. > DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

b. Funding Source. If data shown on Table 1A reflects mare than one appropriation, then please provide a break out of the total shown for the "3. Grand-Totalwhe, by appropriation:

ADDro~riation Amount ($0001

c Table 1B -'~aseOperating Support Costs (DBOF Overhead). This Table should be submitted for all current DBOF activities. Costs reported should reflect BOS costs supporting the DBOF activity itself (usually included in the G&A cost of the activity). For DBOF activities which are tenants on another installation, total cost of BOS incurred by the tenant activity for itself should be shown on this table. It is recognized that differences exist among DBOF activity groups regarding the costing of base opera tin;^ support: some groups reflect all such costs only in general and administrative (G&A), while others spread them between G&A and production overhead. Regardless of the costing process, all such costs should be included on Table 1B. The Minor Construction portion of the FY 1996 capital budget should be included on the appropriate line. Military personnlel costs (at civilian equivalency rates) should also be included on the appropriate Lines of the table. Please ensure that individual lines of the table do not include duplicate costs. Also ensure that there is no duplication between data provided on Table 1A. and 1B. These two tables must be mutually exclusive, since in those cases where both tables are submitted for an activity, the two tables will be added together to estimate total BOS costs at the activity. Add additional lines to the table (following line 21., as necessary, to identify any additional cost elements not currently shown). Leave shaded areas of table blank.

Other Notes: All costs of operating the five Major Range Test Facility Bases at DBOF activities (even if dhct RDT&E funded) should be included on Table 1B. Weapon Stations should include underutilized plant capacity costs as a DBOF overhead "BOS expensew'on Table 1B.. Table 1B - Base Operating Support Costs (1)BOF Overhead)

Activity Name: DO San Diego UIC: 62706

PY 1996 Net Cost From UC/FUND-4 ($33) Category Non-Labor 13Labor Total

2e. Accounting/Finance 2f. Utilities $95 $95 2g. Environmental Compliance 2h. Police and Fire 2i. Safety 2j. Supply and Storage Operations 2k. Major Range Test Facility Base Costs 21. Other (Specify)

2m. Sub-total 2a. through 21:

3. Depreciation 1 4. Grand Total (sum of lc., 2m., and 3.) : $96 DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

11 Table 2 - Services/Supplies Cost Data 11 Activity Name: DO San Diego I UIC: 62706

FY 1996 Cost Category Projected Costs ($000)

Travel: $2 11 Material and Supplies (including equipment): I $833 - - - Industrial Fund Purchases (other DBOF purchases): Transportation: j+ Other Purchases (Contract support, etc.): $3,450 Total: $4.293 DATA CALL 66 INSTALLA'I'ION RESOURCES

------Table 3 - Contract Workyears

Activity Name: Defense Printing Service UIC: 6270 6

FY 1996 Estimated Number of Contract Type Workyears On-Base Construction: Facilities Support: Mission Support: Procurement: Other:* 11 Total Workyears: ------N/A (DPS has tenants only; do not support installations) DA'I'A CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

b. Potential Disposition of On-Base Contract Workyears. I:f the rnission/functions of your activity were relocated to another site, what would be the anticipated disposition of the on-base contract workyears identified in Table 3.?

1) Estimated number of contract workvears which would be transferred to the receiving site (This number should reflect the number of jobs which would in the future be contracted for at the receiving site, not an estimate of the number of people who would move or an indication that work would necessarily be done by the same contractor(s)):

2) Estimated number of workye:ars which would be eliminated:

3) Estimated number of contract workyears which would remain in place (i.e., contract would remain in place in current location even if activity were relocated outside of the local area): DA.TA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

c, "Off-Basevontract Workyear Data. Are there any con.:ract workyears located in the -1 community, but not on-base, which would either be eliminated or relocated if your activity were to be closed or relocated? If so, then provide the following information (ensure that numbers reported below do not double count numbers included in 3,a. and 3.b., above):

No. of Additional Contract Workyears General Type of Work Performed on Contract (e.g., Which Would Be engineering support, technical services, etc.) Eliminated

N/A N/A

No. of Additional Contract Workyears General 'Type of Work Performed on Contract (e.g., Which Would Be engineering support, technical services, etc.) Relocated

N/A DATA CALL #66 DPS and field offices

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and con~pleteto the best of my knowledge and belief. NEXT ECHELON LEVEL (if applicable)

NAME (Please type or print) Signature

Title Date

Activity

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. -. NEXT ECHELON LEVEL (if applicable)

NAME (Please type or print) Signature

Title Date

Activity

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and coml~lete to the best of my knowledge and belief. MAJOR CLAIMANT LEVEL

R. M. MOORE, RADM, SCI USN NAME (Please type or print) Signature 2 4 1994 COMMANDER Title Date NAVAL SUPPLY SYSTEMS COMMAND- Activity

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. DEPUTY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS (LOGISTICS) DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF QNSTALLATIONS & LOCiISTICS) lfiLA. EARNER . 4-- NAME (Please type or print) Signature ,

DA'TA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

Activity Information:

Activity Name: iJavd School of Dental Assistillg and Td-mology

UIC: 68945

Host Activity Name (if Naval Station, San Diego, (3 response is for a tenant activity): Host Activity UIC: 00245

General Instructions/Background. A separate response to this data call must be completed for each Department of the Navy (DON) host, independent and tenant activity which separately budgets BOS costs (regardless of appropriation), and. is located in the IJnited States, its temtories or possessions.

1. Base O~eratin~Su~~ort (BOS) Cost Data. Data is required which captures the total annual cost of operating and maintaining Department of the Navy @ON) shore installations. Information must reflect FY 1996 budget data supporting the FY 1996 NAVCOMPT Budget Submit. Two tables are provided. Table 1A identifies "Other than DBCbF Overhead" BOS costs and Table 1B identiiies "DBOF Overhead" BOS costs. These tables must be completed, as appropriate, for all DON host, independent or tenant activities which separately budget BOS costs (regardless of appropriation), and, are located in the United States, its temtories or possessions. Responses for DBOF activities may need to include both Table 1A and 1.Bto ensure that all BOS costs, including those incurred by the activity in support of tenants, are identified. If both table 1A and 1B are submitted for a single DON activity, please ensure that no data is double counted (that is, included on Table 1A and 1B). The following tables are designed to collect all BOS costs currently budgeted, regardless of appropriation, e.g., Operations and Maintenance, Research and Development, Military Personnel, etc. Data must reflect N 1996 and sllould be reported in thousands of dollars.

a. Table 1A - Base Operating Support Costs (Other Than DBOF Overhead). This Table should be completed to identifjl "Other Than DBOF Overhead" Costs. Display, in the format shown on the table, the O&M, R&D and MPN resources currently budgeted for BOS services. O&M cost data must be consistent with data provided on the EIS-1 exhibit. Report only direct finding for the activity. Host activities should not include reirnbux.sable support provided to tenants, since tenants will be separately reporting these costs. Military personnel costs should be included on the appropriate lines of the table. Please ensure that indikidual lines of the table do not include duplicate costs. Add additional lines to the table (following lie Zj., as necessary, to identlfy any additional cost elements not currently shown). Leave shaded areas of table blank. DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

I Table 1A - Base Operating Support Costs (Other Than DBOF Overhead) I Activity Name: i'hval Schd of ha Assisting & Techndogy I UIC: 65945 FY 1996 IBOS Costs ($000) 11

1 a. Maintenance and Repair 1b. Minor Construction 47.0

2a. Utilities I$ 216.0 0.0 I$ 216.0 1 2b. Transportation 12.0 0.0 1 12.0 # 2c. Environmental I 1.O I 0.0 I 1.0 11 2d. Facility Leases 0.0 0.0 0.0 11 2e. Morale, Welfare & Recreation I 0.0 0.0 I 0.0 4 I 2f Bachelor Quarters I 0.0 I 0.0 0.0 - - I -- 11 2g. Child Care Centers 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 -1 2h. Family Service Centers 1 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 ! 2i. Administration 22.0 655.0 677.0

2j. Other (Specie) +(&e page 2 A 3s 3:- >L

2k Sub-total 2a. through 2j: )$ 281.0 I 655.0 )$ 936.0 I I I II 3. Grand Total (sum of lc. and 2k): (S 366.0 655 I$ 1,021.0 11 Naval School of Ikntal Asssisting and Technology 68945

2j. Gnmmcations $ 15.0 0.0 $ 15.0 Procurement Support 15.0 0.0 15.0 Naval School of Dene& ,kiting adTechlology 68945 DATA CALL 66 INSTALLA'CION RESOURCES

b. Funding Source. If data shown on Table 1A reflects more thim one appropriation, then please provide a break out of the total shown for the "3. Grand-Total" line, by appropriation:

Appropriation Amount ($000)

c. Table 1B - Base Operating Support Costs (DBOF Overhead). This Table should be submitted for all current DBOF activities. Costs reported should reflect BOS costs supporting the DBOF activity itself (usually included in the G&A cost of the activity). For DBOF activities which are tenants on another instailation, total cost of BOS incurred by the tenant activity for itself should be shown on this table. It is recognized that differences exist among DBOF activity groups regarding the costing of base operating support: some groups reflect all such costs only in general and administrative (G&A), while others spread them between GfkA and production overhead. Regardless of the costing process, all such costs should be inciluded on Table 1B. The Minor Construction portion of the FY 1996 capital budget should be incl~udedon the appropriate line. Military personnel costs (at civilian equivalency rates) should also be included on the appropriate lines of the table. Please ensure that individual lines of the table do not include duplicate costs. Also ensure that there is no duplication between data pr'ovided on Table 1A and 1B. These two tables must be mutually exclusive, since in those cases wihere both tables are submitted for an activity, the two tables will be added together to estimate total BOS costs at the activity. Add additional lines to the table (following line 21., as necessary, to identifjl any additional cost elements not currently shown). Leave shaded areas of t.able blank.

Other Notes: All costs of operating the five Major Range Test Facility Bases at DBOF activities (even if direct RDT&E funded) should be included on Table 1B. Weapon Stations should include underutilized plant capacity costs as a DBOF overhead "BOS expense" on Table 1B.. DA'TA CALL 66 INSTALLA.TIONRESOURCES

1 Table 1 B - Base Operating Support Costs (DBOF (IOverhead) Activi* Name: Naval School of Dental &:isti% 8 Technology UIC: 6345

Category Non-Labor Labor-- - L

1. Real Property Maintenance Costs: I I 1a. Real Property Maintenance i>$15K) N/A :{/A >;/A

1 b. Real Prop* Maintenance (415K) M/A ?J/A /I I c. Minor Construction (Eqensed) N/A ?J/A N/A 1 I I I 1 d. Minor Construction (Capital Budget) Y/A

2a. Command Office N/A 2b. ADP Support N/ A 2c. Equipment Mainmance N/A N/A N/A 11 I I I 26 Civilian Persome1 Smces N/A 2e. Accountin@inance N/A DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

2. Services/Su~oIiesCost Data. The purpose of Table 2 is to provide information about projected FY 1996 costs for the purchase of services and supplies by ihe activity. (Note: Unlike Question 1 and Tables 1A and lB, above, this question is not limited to overhead costs.) The source for this information, where possible, should be either the ElAVCOMPT OP-32 Budget Exhibit for O&M activities or the NAVCOMPT UC/FUMD-l/IF-4 exnibit for DBOF activities. Information must reflect FY 1996 budget data supporting the FY 1996 NAVCOMPT Budget Submit. Break out cost data by the major sub-headings identified on the OP-32 or UC/FUND- l/E-4 exhibit, disregarding the sub-heabgs on the exhibit which appliy to civilian and military salary costs and depreciation. Please note that while the OP-32 exhibit aggregates information by budget activity, this data call requests OP-32 data for the activity respc~ndingto the data call. Refer to NAVCOMPTINST 7102.2B of 23 April 1990, Subj: Guidance for the Preparation, Submission and Review of the Department of the Navy (DON) Budget Estimates (DONBudget Guidance Manual) with Changes 1 and 2 for more information on categories of costs ident&d. Any rows that do not apply to your activity may be left blank. However, totals reported should reflect all costs, exclusive of salary and depreciation.

Table 2_ - Services/Supplies Cost Data2

*. Cost Category nJ 11 Travel: S 28.0 Material and Supplies (including; equipment): Industrial Fund Purchases (other DBOF purchases): DATA CALL 66 INSTALLA'TION RESOURCES

3. Contractor Workvears.

a. On-Base Contract Workyear Table. Provide a projected estimate of the number of contract workyears expected to be performed "on base" in support of the installation during FY 1996. Information should represent an annual estimate on a fill-time equivalency basis. Several categories of contract support have been identified in the table below. FWe some of the categories are self-explanatory, please note that the category "mission support" entails management support, labor service and other mission support contracting efforts, e.g., aircraft maintenance, RDT&E support, technical services in support of aircraft and ships, etc.

1 Table 3 - Contract Workyears Activity Name: Navd %'I001 of Dental r4ssisting & Technology

FY 1996 Estimated Number of Contract Type Construction: Facilities Support:

Mission Support: . N/A Procurement: N/,4 Other:*

* Note: Provide a brief narrative description of the type(~)of contracts, if any, included under the "Other" category. Naval School of kntal tlssisting & Te~h~cllogy 63945 DATA CALL 66 INSTALLA'TIONRESOURCES

b. Potential Disposition of On-Base Contract Workyears. If the rnission/fLnctions of your activity were relocated to another site, what would be the anticipated disposition of the on- base contract workyears identified in Table 3.?

1) Estimated number of contract workyears which would be transferred to the receiving site (This number should reflect the number of jobs .which would in the future be contracted for at the receiving site, not an estimate of the number of people who would move or an indication that work would necessarily be clone by the same contractor(s)):

2) Estimated number of workyears which would be eliminated:

3) Estimated number of contract workyears which would rem~tinin lace (i.e., contract wouid rem& in place in current location even if activity were relocated outside of the local area): Paval School of Dental Assisti% & TecFmc)loo,y 63945 DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

c. "Off-Base" Contract Workyear Data. Are there any contract workyears located in the local community, but not on-base, which would either be eliminated or relocated if your activity were to be closed or relocated? If so, then provide the followin,g information (ensure that numbers reported below do not double count numbers included in 3.a. and 3.b., above):

No. of Additional Contract Workyears Which Would General Type of Work Performed on Ccntract (e.g., engineering Be Eliminated support, technical

No. of Additional Contract Workyears Which Would General Type of Work Performed on Cointract (e.g., engineering Be Relocated support, technical

Dental II 1.0 I Hygienist I cerkfy that the information contained herein is zcc!:rate and cmplete tn trc best of my knowledge and belief. NEXT ECHELON LEVEL (if applicable)

Title bate

Activity

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. -. - -- NEXT ECHELON LEVEL (if applicable)

NAME (Please type or print) Signature

Title Date

Activity

I certify that the information contained herein is accurzte and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. MAJOR CLAIMANT LEVEL HAROLD M. KOENIG, RADM,MC,USN NAME (Please type or print) ACTING CHIEF BUMED Title Date BUREAU OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY Activity

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. DEPUTY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS (LOGISTICS) DEPUTY CHIEC OF STAFF (INS'TALLATIONS & LOGISTICS) W.A EARNER M~7Li&L NAME (Please type or print) Signature

Title Date BK.4C-95 CEKTI F IC.4T [OK

Reference: SECNAVNOTE 11000 of 08 December 1993

In accordance with policy set forth by the Secrptary of the hairy: ?~rsonne! of the Department of the Navy, uniformed and civilian, who provide lnformatlon for use in the BRAC-95 process are required to provide a s1gne.a certification that states "I certify that the information contained herein is zccur-ate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. '

The signing of this certification constitutes a representation tnzt the certifying official has reviewed the information and either (1) personally vouche.; for its accuracy and completeness or (2) has possession of, and is relying upon, a cerlification executed by a competent subordinate.

Each individual in your activity generating informaticn for the 8K.4C-95 process must certify that informahon. Enclos~re(1) is prorided ~crindl-.~ldual certifications and may be duplicated as necessary. You are c!irected to maintain those certifications at your activity for audit purposes. C;G~ purposes of this certification sheet, the commander of the activity will begin the certificztion process and each reporting senior in the Chain of Comn:,~nd reviewing the information will also sign this certification sheet. This sheet mllst remzin attached to this package and be forwarded up the Chain of Commancl. Copies must be retained by each level in the Chain of C:ommznd for audit purposes.

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and c:omplete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

James F. Bates. Capt.. m. UlSN NAME (Please type or print)

Carmanding Officer Title Date

Naval Health Sci- Eilucatim and Training Chmnd Activity DAT'A CALL 6 6 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

Activity Information:

Activity Name : Naval Statics San Dlcgs

Host Activity Name N/A

N/A- - General Instructions/Background. A separate response to this data call must be completed for each Department of the Navy (DON) host, independent and tenant activity which separately budgets BOS costs (regardless of appropriation), a,is located in the United States; its territories or possessions.

1. Base o~serztincrSumort (BOS) Cost Data. Data is required which captures the total annual cost of operating and maintaining Department of the Navy (DON) shore installations. Information must reflect FY 1996 budget data supporting the FY 1996 NAVCOMPT Budget Submit. Two tables are provided. Table 1A identifies "Other than DBOF OverheadN BOS costs and Table 1B identifies "DBOF Overheadu1 BOS costs. These tables must be completed, as app:ropriace, for all DON host, independent or tenant activities which separately budget BOS costs (regardless of appropriation), and, are located in the United States, its territories or possessions. Responses for DBOF activities may need to include both Table 1A and lB to ensure that all BOS costs, including those incurred by the act:ivity in support of tenants, are identified. If both table 1A and 1B are submitted for a single DON activity, please ensure that no data is double counted (that is, included on both Table 1A and 1Bl1. The following tabies are designed to collect aii BGS costs currentiy budgeted, regardless of appropriation, e.g., Operations iind Maintenance, Research and Development, Military Personnel, cztc. Data must reflect FY 1996 and should be reported in thousands of dollars.

a. Table 1A - Base Operating Support Costs (Other Than DBOF Overhead). This Table should be completed to identify "Other Than DBOF OverheadggCosts. Display, in the format sholm on the table, the O&M, R&D and MPN resources currently budgeted for BOS services. O&M cost data must be consistent with data provided on the BS-1 exhibit. Report only direct funding for the activity. Host activities should not include reimbursable support provided to tenants, since tenants will be separately reporting these costs. Military personnel costs should be included on the appropriate lines of the table. Please ensure that individual lines of the table do not include duplicate costs. Add additional lines to the DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES table (following line 2j., as necessary, to identify any additional cost elements not currently shown). Leave shadled areas of table blank.

Table 1A - Base Operating Support costs (Other Than DBOF Overhead) 1 ~ctivityName: Naval Station San Diego UIC: NO0245

il la. Maintenance and Repair 25773 I 554 I 26327 I // 1 lb. Minor Construction I 1350 0 1350 I/ I I I I

2. Other Bsse Operating Support

2a. Utilities 2b. Transportation 2c. Environmental 1876 2d. Facility Leases 0 2e. Morale, Welfare & 1045 860 1905 Recreation I 2f. Bachelor Quarters 5124 2059 7183 2g. Child Care Centers 215 2025 2240 2h. Family Service Centers 741 12 14 1955 2i. Administration 820 5857 9173 + 2j. Other (Specify) 9951 ;!I258 31209 2k. Sub-total 2a. through 25715 2,3880 59595 DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

t 3. Grand Total (sum of lc. and 52838 34434 87272 2k. ) : DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

b. ~undingSource. If data shown on Table 1A reflects more than one appropriation, then please provide a break out of the total shown for the "3. Grand-Total" line, by appropriation:

Appropriation Amount ($000) MPN O&MN

. - c. Table 1B - Base Operating Support ~okts(DBOF Overhead). This Table should be submitted for all current DBOF activities. Costs reported should reflect BOS costs supporting the DBOF activity itself (usually included in the G&A cost of the activity). For DBOF activities which arc? tenants on another installation, total cost of BOS incurred by the tenant activity for itse1.f should be shown on this table. It is recognized that differences exist among DBOF activity groups regarding the costing of base operating support: some.groups reflect all such costs only in general and administrative (G&A), while others spread them between G&A and production overhead. Regardless of the costing process, all such costs shouid be included on 'Table 1B. The Minor Construction portion of the FY 1996 capital budget should be included on the appropriate line. Miiitary personnel costs (at civilian equivalency rates) should also be included on the appropriate lines of the table. Please ensure that individual lines of the table do not include duplicate costs. Also ensure that there is no duplication between data provided on Table 1A. arid 1B. These two tables must be mutually exclusive, since in those cases where both tables are submitted for an activity, the two tables will be added together to estimate total BOS costs at the activity. Add additional lines to the table (following line 21., as necessary, to identify any additional cost elements not currently shown). Leave shaded areas of table blank. Other Notes: All costs of operating the five Ellajor Range Test Facility Bases at DBOF activities (even if direct RDT&E funded) should be included on Table 1B. Weapon Stations should include underutilized plant capacity costs as a DBOF overhead "BOS expensell on Table 1B.. DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

Table 1B - Base Operating Support Costs (DBOF Overhead) I I (Activity Name: Naval Station San Diego UIC: NO0245 r FY 1996 Net Cost From UC/FUND-4 I Category 000 , , I/ Non-Labor Labor Total

1. Real Property Maintenance Costs: la. Real Property Maintenance (>S15K) 1 lb. Real Property Maintenance I 11 1c. Minor Construction (Expensed) 0 0 II Id. Minor Construction (Capital (I Budget)

1 lc. Sub-total la. throuah- - a-- Id.-- I 0- 1 n 1 n 11

2. Other Base Operating Support Costs: 0 11 2a. Command Off ice 1 0 0 11 ib. MP Support 1 0 0 o C 2c. Equipment Maintenance 0 2d. Civilian Personnel Services 0 2e. Accounting/Finance 2f. Utilities 11 2q. Environmental Compliance 0 0 I OII II I 2n. Poilue and F~re 0 2i. Safety 0 2j. Supply and Storage Operations 0 2k. Major Range Test Facility Base 0 Costs 21. Other (Specify) 0 1 2m. Sub-total 2a. throuoh 21: I o 1 o 1 n 11

11 3. Depreciation I 0 1 0 1 0 11 4. Grand Total (sum of lc., 2m., and 0 3.) :

2. services/Su~~liesCost Data. The purpose olT Table 2 is to DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

provide information about projected FY 1996 cost.5 for the purchase of services and supplies by the activity. (Note: Unlike Question 1 and Tables 1A and lB, above, this question :is not limited to overhead costs.) The source for this information, where possible, should be either the NAVCOMPT OP-32 Budget Exhibit for O&M activities or the NAVCOXPT UC/FUND-1/IF-4 ~xhibit for GEOF activities. Information must reflect FY 1996 budget data supporting the FY 1996 NAVCOMPT Budget Submit. Break out cost data by the major sub-headings identified on the OP-32 or UC/FUND-1/IF-4 exhibit, disregarding the sub-headings on the exhibit which apply to civilian and military salary costs and depreciation. Please note that while the OP-32 exhibit aggregates infcrmation by budget activity, this data call requests OP-32 data for the activity responding to the data call. Refer to NAVCOMPTINST 7102.2B of 23 April 1990, Sl~bj: Guidance for the Preparation, Submission and Review of the Department of the Navy (DON) Budget Estimates (DON Budget Guidance Manual) with Changes 1 and 2 for more information on categories of costs identified. Any rows thaz do not apply to your activity may be left blank. However, total:; reported should reflect all costs, exclusive of salary and depreciation.

Table 2 - Services/Supplies Cost Data I I I 1 Activity Name: Navai Station San Diego UIC!: NO0245 i I FY 1996 Cost Category -Projected Costs ~soool (1 Travel: kl 11 Material and Suppiies iin~ludingequipment): I 1676 !/ I Industrial Fund Purchases (other DBOF 20174

I( Other Purchases (Contract support, etc. ) : I 20595 11 Total: 42502 DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

3. Contractor Workvears. a. On-Base Contract Workyear Table. Provide a projected estimate of the number of eoritraet work year:^ expected to be performed "on basew in support of the installation during FY 1996. Information should represent an annual estimate on a full-time equivalency basis. Several categories of contract support have been identified in the table below. While some of the categories are self-explanatory, please note that the category "mission supportvv entails management support, labor service and other mission support contracting efforts, e-g., aircraft maintenance, RDT&E support, technical services in support of.aircraft and ships, etc.

,Table 3 - Contract Workyears

I I (1 Activity Name: Naval Statiorl San Dieao 1 UIC: NO0245 I

FY 1996 Estimated I Number of 11 Contract Type Wclrkyears On-Base !I 1 Construction: Facilities Support: 11 ** 67 (1 11 Mission Support: ! 1 Procurement: I O II 1) Other: * I Total Workyears: 104

* Note: Provide a brief narrative- description of the type(s) of contracts, if any, included under the "Otherm1category. ** MRP Contract amounts are included in Facilities Support. DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

b. Potential Disposition of On-Base Contract Workyears. If the mission/functions of your activity were relocated to another site, what would be the anticipated disposition of the on-lase cor~iractworkvears identified in Tabie 3.T

1) Estimated number of contract workyears which would be transferred to the receiving site (This number should reflect the number of'jobs which would in the future be contracted for at the receiving site, not an estimate of the number of people who would move or an indication that work would necessarily be done by the same contractor(s)): - -

2) Estimated number of workyears which would be eliminated:

3) Estimated number of contract workyears which would remain in lace (i.e., contract would remain in place in current location even if activity were relocated outside of the local area): DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

c. "Off-Baseu Contract Workyear Data. Are there any contract workyears located in the local community, but not on-base, which would either be eliminated or relocated if your acti.vity were to be closed or relocated? If so, then provide the fo1:Lowing information (ensure that numbers reported below do not double count numbers included in 3.a. and 3.b., above):

. - No. of Additional Contract General Type of Work Performed on Contract Workyears Which (e.g., engineering support, technical Would Be services, etc. ) Eliminated

I No. of Additional Contract General Type of Work Perforned on Contract Workyears Which (e.g., engineering support, technical Would Be services, etc. ) Relocated Contract workyears for local household 13 moves for military BRAC-95 CERTIFICATION DATA CALL SIXTJ' SIX

NAVSTA SAN DIEGO

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. MAJOR CLAIMANT LEVEL

R. J. KELLY NAME (Please type or print) Commander In Chief 3 kuc, 'I'i Title Date

U. S. Pacific Fleet Activity

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

DEPUTY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS (LOGISTICS) DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF (INSTALLATIONS & LO(3ISTICS)

Y3;;I. A. EARNER ;P

NAME (Please type or print) Signature

I Title Date BRAC 95 DATA CALL SIXTY SIX NAVAL STATION SAN DIEGO I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

TYPE COMMANDER LEVEL

1 DATE: 7/~/- DAVID B. R~BINs~N,VADM. USN COMMANDER, NAVAL SURFACE FORCE, U.S. PACIFIC FLEET

- DATE: ://J,/? yL D. G. ROACH, CAPT, CEC, USN

FORCE CIVIL ENGINEER-- - COMMANDER, NAVAL SURFACE FORCE, U.S. PACIFIC FLEET

DATE: : ad/yy' . FORCE COMPTROLLER COMMANDER, NAVAL SURFACE FORCE, U.S. PACIFIC FLEET BRAC-95 DATA CALL NUMBER SIXTY SI:< CERTII'ICATION

Reference: SECNAVNOTE 11000 of 08 December 1993

In accordance with policy set forth by the Secretary of the Navy, personnel of the Department of the Navy, uniformed and civilian, who provide information for use in the BRP,C-95 process are required to provide a signed certification that states "I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief."

The signing of this certification constitutes a representation that the certifying official has reviewed the information and either (1) personally vouches for its accuracy and comp1ete:ness or (2) has possession of, and is relying upon, a certification executed by a competent subordinate.

Each individual in your activity generating information for the BRAC-95 pmssmust certify that information. Enclosure (1) is provided for individual certifications and may be duplicated as necessary. You are directed to maintain those certifications at your activity for audit purposes. For purposes of this certification sheet, the commander of the activity will begin the certification process and each reporting senior in the Chain of Command reviewing the information will also sign this, certification sheet. This sheet must remain attached to this package and be forwarded up the Chain of Command. Copies must be retained by each level in the Chain of Command for audit purposes.

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the test of my knowledge and belief.

ACTIVITY COMMANDER

M. K. COLLINS, CAPTAIN, USN NAME (Please type or print) Signature

COMMANDING OFFICER I Title Date

NAVAL STATION SAN DIEGO, CA. Activity

Enclosure (1) DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

Activity Information:

Activity Name: BMC, Naval Station, San Diego, CA UIC: -45020 Host Activity Name (if Naval S~tion,San Diego, Ca response is for a tenant activity) : Host Activity UIC: 00245

General Instructions/Background. A separate response to this data c:all must be completed for each Department of the Navy (DON) host, independent and tenant activity which separately budgets BOS costs (regardless of appropriation), a,is 1oc:ated in the United States, its territories or possessions.

1. Base Operatine Su~port(BOS) Cost Data. Data is required wh;,ch captures the total annual cost of operating and maintaining Department of the Navy (DON) shore installations. Information must reflect FY 1996 budget data supporting the FY 1996 NAVCOMPT Budget Submit. Two tables are provided. Table IA identifies "Other than DBOF Overhead" BOS costs and Table 1B identifies "DBOF Overhead" BOS costs. These tables must be completed, as appropriate, for all DON host, independent or tenant activities which separately budget BOS costs (regardless of appropriation), a,are located in the United States, its territories or possessions. Responses for DBOF activities may need to include both Table 1A and IB to ensure that all BOS costs, including those incurred by the activity in support of tenants, are identified. If both table 1A and 1B are submitted for a single DON activity, please ensure that no data is double counted (that is, included on Table 1A and 1B). The following tables are designed to collect all BOS costs currently budgeted, regardless of appropriation, e.g., Operations and Maintenance, Research and Development, Military Personnel, etc. Data must reflect FY 1996 and should be reported in thousands of dollars.

a. Table 1A - Base Operating Support Costs (Other Than DISOF Overhead). This Table should be completed to identify "Other Than DBOF Overhead" Costs. Display, in the format shown on the table, the O&M, R&D and MPN resources currently budgeted for BOS services. O&M cost data must be consistent with data provided on the BS-1 exhibit. Report only direct funding for the activity. Host activities should not include reimbursable support provided to tenants, since tenants will be separate,ly reporting these costs. Military personnel costs should be included on the appropriate lines of the table. Please ensure that individual lines of the table do not include duplicate costs. Add additional DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES lines to the table (following line 2j., as necessary, to identify any additional cost elements not currently shown). Leave shaded areas of' table blank. rl 11 Table 1A - Base Operating Support Costs (Other Than DBOF Overhead)

Activity Name: BRMEDCL NAVSTA SDIEGO CA UIC: 45020

FY 1996 BOS Costs ($000) Category Non-Labor

I I CivllvIil* L 1. Real Property Maintenance Costs: la. Maintenance and Repair 2 2 lb. Minor Construction 4 4 lc. Sub-total la. and lb. 6 6

2. Other Base Operating Support Costs: 1 2a. Utilities I 246 1 I 246 11 2b. Transwrtation - - - 2c. Environmental 2d. Facility Leases 2e. Morale, Welfare & Recreation 2f. Bachelor Quarters 2g. Child Care Centers 2h. Family Service Centers 2i. Administration 2j. Other Engineer Support 2k. Supply Operations 21. Other Personnel Support 2m. Base Communications 65 65 2n. Physical Security DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

20. Sub-total 2a. through 2n: 31 1

3. Grand Total (sum of lc. and 20.): 317

* Note: FY 96 Military Personnel Cost is based on N 94 8 months actual (NC2171), use 8 months average to project out for the year and straight line for the out years. DATA CALL 66 INSTALLA'I'ION RESOURCES

b. Funding Source. If data shown on Table 1A reflects more than one appropriation, then please provide a break out of the total shown for the "3. Grand-Total" line, by appropriation:

Approwriation Amount ($000) 9760130.1885 $3 17

c. Table 1B - Base Operating Support Costs @BOF Overhead). This Table should be submitted for all current DBOF activities. Costs reported should reflect BOS costs supporting the DBOF activity itself (usually included in the G&A cost of the activity). For DBOF activities which are tenants on another installation, total cost of BOS incurred by the tenant activity for itself should be shown on this table. It is recognized that differences exist among DBOF activity groups regarding the costing of base operating support: some groups reflect all such costs only in general and administrative (G&A), while others spread them between G&A and production overhead. Regardless of the costing process, all such costs should be included on Table 1B. The Minor Construction portion of the FY 1996 capital budget should be included on the appropriate line. Military personnel costs (at civilian equivalency rates) should also be included on the appropriate lines of the table. Please ensure that individual lines of the table do not include duplicate costs. Also ensure that there is no duplication between data provided on 'Table 1A. and 1B. These two tables must be mutually exclusive, since in those cases where both tables are submitted for an activity, the two tables will be added together to estimate total BOS costs at the activity. Add additional lines to the table (following line 21., as necessary, to identify any additional cost elements not currently shown). Leave shaded areas of table blank.

Other Notes: All costs of operating the five Major Range Test Facility Bases at DBOF activities (even if direct RDT&E funded) should be included on Table 1B. Weapon Stations should include underutilized plant capacity costs as a DBOF overhead "BOS expense" on Table 1B.. DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

Table IB - Base Operating Support Costs (DBOF Overhead)

Activity Name: N/A UIC:

N 1996 Net Cost From UCIFZTND-4 ($000) Category Non-Labor Labor Total

1. Real Property Maintenance Costs: la. Real Property Maintenance (>$15K) Ib. Real Property Maintenance (<$15K) lc. Minor Construction (Expensed) Id. Minor Construction (Capital Budget)

lc. Sub-total la. through Id.

2. Other Base Operating Support Costs: 2a. Command Oftice 2b. ADP Support 2c. Equipment Maintenance 2d. Civilian Personnel Services 2e. AccountingIFinance - --- 2f. Utilities 2g. Environmental Compliance 2h. Police and Fire 2i. Safety 2j. Supply and Storage Operations 2k. Major Range Test Facility Base Costs 21. Other (Specify)

2m. Sub-total 2a. through 21:

3. Depreciation

4. Grand Total (sum of lc., 2m., and 3.) : DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

2. ServicesISu~pliesCost Data. The purpose of Table 2 is to provide information about projected FY 1996 costs for the purchase of services and supplies by the activity. (Note: Unlike Question 1 and Tables 1A and lB, above, this question is not limited to overhead costs.) The source for this information, where possible, should be either the NAVCOMPT OP-32 Budget Exhibit for O&M activities or the NAVCOMPT UCIFUND-IIIF-4 exhibit for DBOF activities. Information must reflect FY 1996 budget data supporting the FY 1996 NAVCOMPT Budget Submit. Break out cost data by the major sub-headings identified on the OP-32 or UCIFUND-1IIF-4 exhibit, disregarding the sub-headings on the exhibit which apply to civilian and military salary costs and depreciation. Please note that while the OP-32 exhibit aggregates information by budget activity, this data call requests OP-32 data for the activity responding to the data call. Refer to NAVCOMPTINST 7102.2B of 23 April 1990, Subj: Guidance for the Preparation, Submission and Review of the Department of the Navy (DON) Budget Estimates (DON Budget Guidance Manual) with Changes 1 and 2 for more information on categories of costs identified. Any rows that do not apply to your activity may be left blank. However, totals reported should reflect all costs, exclusive of salary and depreciation.

Table 2 - ServicesISupplies Cost Data

Activity Name: BRMEDCL NAVSTA SDIEGO CA UIC: 45020

FY 1996 Cost Category Projected Costs ($000) Travel: 4 Material and Supplies (including equipment): 5,940 Industrial Fund Purchases (other DBOE purchases): 0 Transportation: 0 Other Purchases (Contract support, etc.): 1,256 Total: 7,200 DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

3. Contractor Worl

a. On-Base Contract Workyear Table. Provide a projected estimate of the number of contract workyears expected to be performed Iton basettin support of the installation during FY 1996. Information should represent an annual estimate on a full-time equivalency basis. Several categories of contract support have been identified in the table below. While some of the categories are self-explanatory, please note that the category "mission support" entails management support, labor service and other mission support contracting efforts, e.g., aircraft maintenance, RDT&E support, technical services in support of aircraft and ships, etc.

Table 3 - Contract Workyears

Activity Name: BRMEDCL NAVSTA SIIIEGO CA UIC: 45020

FY 1996 Estimated Number of Contract Type Workyears On-Base Construction: * Facilities Support: * Mission Support: 9 Procurement: 0 Other: * 0 Total Workyears: 9

* Note: Provide a brief narrative description of the type($ of contracts, if any, included under the "Other" category.

* All On-Base worklservices are being performed/contracted by the Navy Public Works Center and the Southwest Division, Naval Facilities Engineering Command. DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

b. Potential Disposition of On-Base Contract Workyears. If the mission/functions of your activity were relocated to another site, what would be the anticipated disposition of the on-base contract workvears identified in Table 3.?

1) Estimated number of contract .workyears which would be transferred to the receiving site (This number should reflect the number of jobs which would in the future be contracted for at the receiving site, not an estimate of the number of people who would move or an indication that work would necessarily be done by the same contractor(s)):

2) Estimated number of workyears which would be eliminated:

3) Estimated number of contract workyears which would remain in place (i.e., contract would remain in place in current location even if activity were relocated outside of the local area): DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

b. Potential Disposition of On-Base Contract Workyears. If the mission/functions of your activity were relocated to another site, what would be the anticipated disposition of the on-base contract workvears identified in Table 3.? NIA.

1) Estimated number of contract workyears which would be transferred to the receiving site (This number should reflect the number of jobs which would in the future be contracted for at the receiving site, not an estimate of the number of people who would move or an indication that work would necessarily be done by the same contractor(s)):

2) Estimated number of workyears which would be eliminated:

3) Estimated number of contract workyears which would remain in place (i.e., contract would remain in place in current location even if activity were relocated outside of the local area): DATA CALL 66 INSTALLA'TION RESOURCES

c. "Off-Base" Contract Workyear Data. Are there any contract workyears located in the local community, but not on-base, which would either be eliminated or relocated if your activity were to be closed or relocated? If so, then provide the following information (ensure that numbers reported below do not double count numbers included in 3.a. and 3.b., above): None.

No. of Additional Contract Workyears General Type of Work Performed on Contract (e.g., Which Would Be engineering support, technical services, etc.) Eliminated

No. of Additional Contract Workyears General Type of Work Performed on Contract (e.g., Which Would Be engineering support, technical services, etc.) Relocated BRAC-95 CERTIFICATION

Reference: SECNAVNOTE 11000 of 08 December 1993

In accordance with policy set forth by the Secretary of the Navy, personnel of the Department of the Navy, uniformed and civilian, who provide information for use in the BRAC-95 process are required to provide a signed certitication that states "I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief."

The signing of this certitication constitutes a representation that the certifying official has reviewed the information and either (1) personally vouches for its accuracy and completeness or (2) has possession of, and is relying upon, a certification executed by a competent subordinate.

Each individual in your activity generating information for the BRAC-95 process must certify that information. Enclosure (1) is provided for individual certifications and may be duplicated as necessary. You are directed to maintain those certifications at your activity for audit purposes. For purposes of this certification sheet, the commander of the activity will begin the certification process and each reporting senior in the Chain of Command reviewing the information will also sign this certification sheet. This sheet must remain attached to this package and be forwarded up the Chain of Command. Copies must be retained by each level in the Chain of Command for audit purposes.

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. ACTIVITY COMMANDER D. F. LEONARD. CAPT. MC. USN w,u- NAME (Please type or print) Signature

DIRECTOR FOR BRANCH CLINIC OPERATIONS Title Da

BRMEDCL NAVSTA. SAN DIEGO Activity I certitj that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. NEXT ECHELON LEVEL (if applicable)

T. K. BURKHARD. CAPT. MC. USN NAME (Please type or print) Sighature COMMANDER. ACTING 7//yfi?i Title Date I I NAVAL MEDICAL CENTER. SAN DTEGO Activity

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. NEXT ECHELON LEVEL (if applicable)

NAME (Please type or print) Signature

Title Date

Activity

I certitj that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. MAJOR CLAIMANT LEVEL / D. F. HAGEN, VADM, MC, USN NAME (Please type or print) CHIEF BUMED/ SURGEON GENERAL Title Date

BUREAU OF MEDICINE & SURGERY Activity

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. DEPUTY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS (LOGISTICS) DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF (INSTALLAT J. B. GREENE, JR.

NAME (Please type or print) ACTING

Title Date DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

Activity Information:

General Instructions/Background. A separate response to this data call must be completed for each Department of the Navy @ON) host, independent and tenant activity which separately budgets BOS costs (regardless of appropriation), and, is located in the United States, its territories or possessions.

1. Base Operaticy Support mOS) Cost Data. Data is required which captures the total I annual cost of operating and maintaining Department of the Navy @ON) shore installations. Information must reflect FY 1996 budget data supporting the FY 1996 NAVCOMPT Budget Submit. Two tables are provided. Table 1A identifies "Other than DBOF Overhead" BOS costs and Table 1B identifies "DBOF Overhead" BOS costs. These tables must be completed, as appropriate, for all DON host, independent or tenant activities which separately budget BOS costs (regardless of appropriation), and. are located in the United States, its territories or possessions. Responses for DBOF activities may need to include both Table 1A and 1B to ensure that all BOS costs, including those incurred by the activity in support of tenants, are identified. If both table 1A and 1B are submitted for a single DON activity, please ensure that no data is double counted (that is, included on both Table 1A and 1B). The following tables are designed to collect all BOS costs currently budgeted, regardless of appropriation, e.g., Operations and Maintenance, Research and Development, Military Personnel, etc. Data must reflect FY 1996 and should be reported in thousands of dollars. a. Table LA - Base Operating Support Costs (Other Than DBOF Overhead). This Table should be completed to identify "Other Than DBOF Overhead" Costs. Display, in the format shown on the table, the O&M, R&D and MPN resources currently budgeted for BOS services. O&M cost data must be consistent with data provided on the BS-1 exhibit. Report only direct funding for the activity. Host activities should not include reimbursable support provided to tenants, since tenants will be separately reporting these costs. Military personnel costs should be included on the appropriate lines of the table. Please ensure that individual lines of the table do not include duplicate costs. Add additional lines to the table (following line 2j., as necessary, to identify any additional cost elements not currently shown). Leave shaded areas of table blank DATA CALL 66 INSTALIATION RESOURCES DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

b. Funding Source. If data shown on Table 1A reflects more than one appropriation, then please provide a break out of the total shown for the "3. Grand-Total" line, by appropriation:

Appropriation Amount ($000)

O&M,N 218.6

c. Table 1B - Base Operating Support Costs @BOF Overhead). This Table should be submitted for all current DBOF activities. Costs reported should reflect BOS costs supporting the DBOF activity itself (usually included in the G&A cost of the activity). For DBOF activities which are tenants on another installation, total cost of BOS incurred by the tenant activity for itself should be shown on this table. It is recognized that differences exist among DBOF activity groups regarding the costing of base operating support: some groups . reflect all such costs only in general and administrative (G&A), while others spread them between G&A and production overhead. Regardless of the costing process, all such costs 8 should be included on Table 1B. The Minor Construction portion of the FY 1996 capital budget should be included on the appropriate line. Military personnel costs (at civilian equivalency rates) should also be included on the appropriate lines of the table. Please ensure that individual lines of the table do not include duplicate costs. Also ensure that there is no duplication between data provided on Table 1A. and 1B. These two tables must be mutually exclusive, since in those cases where both tables are submitted for an activity, the two tables will be added together to estimate total BOS costs at the activity. Add additional lines to the table (following line 21., as necessary, to identify any additional cost elements not currently shown). Leave shaded areas of table blank

Other Notes: All costs of operating the five Major Range Test Facility Bases at DBOF activities (even if direct RDT&E funded) should be included on Table 1B. Weapon Stations should include underutilized plant capacity costs as a DBOF overhead "BOS expense" on Table 1B.. DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

3. Depreciation DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

2. ServicesISu~~liesCost Data. The purpose of Table 2 is to provide information about projected FY 1996 costs for the purchase of services and supplies by the activity. (Note: Unlike Question 1 and Tables 1A and lB, above, this question is not limited to overhead costs.) The source for this information, where possible, should be either the NAVCOMPT OP-32 Budget Exhibit for O&M activities or the NAVCOMPT UC/FUND-VIF-4 exhibit for DBOF activities. Information must reflect FY 1996 budget &ta supporting the FY 1996 NAVCOMPT Budget Submit. Break out cost data by the major sub-headings identified on the OP-32 or UC/FUND-1AF-4 exhibit, disregarding the sub-headings on the exhibit which apply to civilian and military salary costs and depreciation. Please note that while the OP-32 exhibit aggregates information by budget activity, this data call requests OP-32 data for the activity responding to the data call. Refer to NAVCOMPTINST 7102.2B of 23 April 1990, Subj: Guidance for the Preparation, Submission and Review of the'~epartmentof the Navy (DON) Budget Estimates @ON Budget Guidance Manual) with Changes 1 and 2 for more information on categories of costs identified. Any rows that do not apply to your activity may be left blank. However, totals reported should reflect all costs, exclusive of salary and depreciation.

Cost Category DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

3. Contractor Workyears.

a. On-Base Contract Workyear Table. Provide a projected estimate of the number of contract workyears expected to be performed "on base" in support of the installation during FY 1996. Infomation should represent an annual estimate on a full-time equivalency basis. Several categories of contract support have been identified in the table below. While some of the categories are self-explanatory, please note that the category "mission support" entails management support, labor service and other mission support contracting efforts, e.g., aircraft maintenance, RDT&E, support, technical services in support of aircraft and ships, etc.

* Note: Provide a brief narrative description of the type(s) of contracts, if any, included under the "Other" category. DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

b. Potential Disposition of On-Base Contract Workyears. If the mission/functions of your activity were relocated to another site, what would be the anticipated disposition of the on-base contract workvears identified in Table 3.?

1) Estimated number of contract workvears which would be transferred to the receivin~site (This number should reflect the number of jobs which would in the future be contracted for at the receiving site, not an estimate of the number of people who would move or an indication that work would necessarily be done by the same contractor(s)):

2) Estimated number of workvears which would be eliminated:

3) Estimated number of contract workyears which would remain in place (i.e., contract would remain in place in current location even if activity were relocated outside of the local area): DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

c. "Off-Base" Contract Workyear Data. Are there any contract workyears located in the local community, but not on-base, which would either be eliminated or relocated if your activity were to be closed or relocated? If so, then provide the following information (ensure that numbers reported below do not double count numbers included in 3.a. and 3.b- above):

No. of Additional General Type of Work Performed on Contract (e.g., engineering support, technical services, etc.)

Contract Workyears General Type of Work Performed on Contract (e.g., Which Would Be engineering support, technical services, etc.) BRAC-95 CERTIFICATION

Reference: SECNAVNOTE 11000 of 08 December 1993 In accordance with policy set forth by the Secretary of the Navy, personnel of the Department of the Navy, uniformed and civilian, who provide information for use in the BRAC-95 process are required to provide a signed certification that states "I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief." The signing of this certification constitutes a representation that the certifying official has reviewed the information and either (1) personally vouches for its accuracy and completeness or (2) has possession of, and is relying upon, a certification executed by a competent subordinate. - - ~achindividual in your activity generating information for the BRAC-95 process must certify that information. Enclosure (1) is provided for individual certifications and may be duplicated as necessary. You are directed to maintain those certifications at your activity for audit purposes. For purposes of this certification sheet, the commander of the activity will begin the certification process and each reporting senior in the Chain of Command reviewing the information will also sign this certification sheet. This sheet must remain attached to this package and be forwarded up the Chain of Command. Copies must be retained by each level in the Chain of Command for audit purposes.

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. ACTIVITY COMMANDER

C. M. Learand. RADM, JAGC I NAME (Please type or print) SGnature / 1 Commander, NAVLEGSVCCOM 1'5 30~'fCj p Title Date Naval Leaal Service Command - Activity . ... < I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. NEXT ECHELON LEVEL (if applicable)

NAME (Please type or print) Signature

Title Date

Activity

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. -. - ~. NEXT ECHELON LEVEL (if applicable)

NAME (Please type or print) Signature

Title Date

Activity

I certify Uiat the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. MAJOR CLAIMANT L

Mr. Robert W. Tliornett - NAME (Please type or print) Sigdture Director Title Date / '

Field Suuuort Activity Activity

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. DEPUTY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS (LOGISTICS) DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF (INST J. B. GqEENE, NAME (Please type or print) ACTING .. Title Date DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

Activity Information:

Activity Name: Bureau of Naval Personnel Detachment Drug and Alcohol Program Management Activity (DAPMA) N68482 Host Activity Name (if Naval Training Center San Diego CA response is for a tenant activity): Host Activity UIC: NO0062

General InstructionslBackground. A separate response to this data call must be completed for each Department of the Navy (DON) holst, independent and tenant activity which separately budgets BOS costs (regardless of appropriation), ad, is located in the United States, its territories or possessions.

1. Base O~eratineSu~~ort (BOS) Cost Data. Data is required which captures the total annual cost of operating and maintaining Department of the Navy (DON) shore installations. Information must reflect FY 1996 budget data supporting the FY 1996 NAVCOMPT Budget Submit. Two tables are provided. Table 1A identifies "Other than DBOF Overhead" BOS costs and Table 1B identifies "DBOF Overhead" BOS costs. These tables must be completed, as appropriate, for all DON host, independent or tenant activities which separately budget BOS costs (regardless of appropriation), a,are located in the United States, its territories or possessions. Responses for DBOF activities may need to include both Table 1A and 1B to ensure that all BOS costs, including those incurred by the activity in support of tenants, are identified. If both table 1A and 1B are submitted for a single DON activity, please ensure that no data is double counted (that is, included on IJ& Table 1A and 1B). The following tables are designed to collect all BOS costs currently budgeted, regardless of appropriation, e.g., Operations and Maintenance, Research and Development, Military Personnel, etc. Data must reflect FY 1996 and should be reported in thousands of dollars.

a. Table 1A - Base Operating Support Costs (Other Than DBOF Overhead). This Table should be completed to identify "Other Than DBOF Overhead" Costs. Display, in the format shown on the table, the O&M, R&D and MPN resources currently budgeted for BOS services. O&M cost data must be consistent with data provided on the BS-1 exhibit. Report only direct funding for the activity. Host activities should not include reimbursable support provided to tenants, since tenants will be separately reporting these costs. Military personnel costs should be included on the appropriate lines of the table. Please ensure that individual lines of the table do not include duplicate costs. Add additional DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES lines to the table (following line 2j., as necessary, to identify any additional cost elements not currently shown). Leave shaded areas of table blank.

Table 1A - Base Operating Support Costs (Other Than DBOF Overhead)

Activity Name: Bureau of Naval Personnel Detachment UIC: N68482 Drug and Alcohol Program Management Activity (DAPMA)

FY 1996 BOS Costs ($000) Category Non-Labor Labor Total I 1. Real Property Maintenance Costs: la. Maintenance and Repair 2 0 2 lb. Minor Construction 0 0 0 lc. Sub-total la. and lb. 2 0 2 2. Other Base Operating Support Costs: 2a. Utilities 8 0 8 2b. Transportation 3 0 3 2c. Environmental 0 0 0 2d. Facility Leases 0 0 0 2e. Morale, Welfare & Recreation 0 0 0 2f. Bachelor Quarters 0 0 0 2g. Child Care Centers 0 0 0 2h. Family Service Centers 0 0 0 2i. Administration 0 0 0 2j. Other (Specify) 0 0 0 2k. Sub-total 2a. through 2j: 11 0 11 I 3. Grand Total (sum of lc. and 2k.): 13 0 13 DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

b. Funding Source. If data shown on Table 1A reflects more than one appropriation, then please provide a break out of the total shown for the "3. Grand-Total" line, by appropriation:

A~~ropriation Amount ($000)

c. Table 1B - Base Operating Support Costs (DBOF Overhead). This Table should be submitted for all current DBOF activities. Costs reported should reflect BOS costs supporting the DBOF activity itself (usually included in the G&A cost of the activity). For DBOF activities which are tenants on another installation, total cost of BOS incurred by the tenant activity for itself should be shown on this table. It is recognized that differences exist among DBOF activity groups regarding the costing of base operating support: some groups reflect all such costs only in general and administrative (G&A), while others spread them between G&A and production overhead. Regardless of the costing process, all such costs should be included on Table IB. The Minor Construction portion of the FY 1996 capital budget should be included on the appropriate line. Military personnel costs (at civilian equivalency rates) should also be included on the appropriate lines of the table. Please ensure that individual lines of the table do not include duplicate costs. Also ensure that there is no duplication between data provided on Table 1A. and 1B. These two tables must be mutually exclusive, since in those cases where both tables are submitted for an activity, the two tables will be added together to estimate total BOS costs at the activity. Add additional lines to the table (following line 21., as necessary, to identify any additional cost elements not currently shown). Leave shaded areas of table blank.

Other Notes: All costs of operating the five Major Range Test Facility Bases at DBOF activities (even if direct RDT&E funded) should be included on Table 1B. Weapon Stations should include underutilized plant capacity costs as a DBOF overhead "BOS expense" on Table 1B.. DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

Table 1B - Base Operating Support Costs (DBOF Overhead)

I Activity Name: Bureau of Naval Personnel Iletachment Drug and UIC: N68482 Alcohol Program Management Activity (DAPMA)

I FY 1996 Net Cost From UCIFUND-4 ($000) Category Non-Labor Labor Total

1. Real Property Maintenance Costs: - -- la. Real Property Maintenance (>$15K) 0 0 0 lb. Real Property Maintenance ( < $15K) 0 0 0

lc. Minor Construction (Expensed) 0 0 0 Id. Minor Construction (Capital Budget) 0 0 0

lc. Sub-total la. through Id. 0 0 0

2. Other Base Operating Support Costs:

2a. Command Oftice 0 0 0 2b. ADP Support 0 0 0 2c. Equipment Maintenance 0 0 0 2d. Civilian Personnel Services 0 0 0 2e. AccountingIFinance 0 0 0 2f. Utilities 0 0 0 2g. Environmental Compliance 0 0 0 2h. Police and Fire 0 0 0 2i. Safety 0 0 0 2j. Supply and Storage Operations 0 0 0 2k. Major Range Test Facility Base Costs 0 0 0 21. Other (Specify) 0 0 0

2m. Sub-total 2a. through 21: 0 0 0 11 3. Depreciation DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

-- -- - 11 4. ~rnndTotal (sum of le., Zm., and 3.) : 7 orp 0 0

2. Services/Su~~liesCost Data. The purpose of Table 2 is to provide information about projected FY 1996 costs for the purchase of services and supplies by the activity. (Note: Unlike Question 1 and Tables 1A and IB, above, this question is not limited to overhead costs.) The source for this information, where possible, should be either the NAVCOMPT OP-32 Budget Exhibit for O&M activities or the NAVCOMPT UCIFUND-IIIF-4 exhibit for DBOF activities. Information must reflect FY 1996 budget data supporting the FY 1996 NAVCOMPT Budget Submit. Break out cost data by the major sub-headings identified on the OP-32 or UCIFUND-11IF-4 exhibit, disregarding the sub-headings on the exhibit which apply to civilian and military salary costs and depreciation. Please note that while the OP-32 exhibit aggregates information by budget activity, this data call requests OP-32 data for the activity responding to the data call. Refer to NAVCOMPTINST 7102.2B of 23 April 1990, Subj: Guidance for the Preparation, Submission and Review of the Department of the Navy (DON) Budget Estimates (DON Budget Guidance Manual) with Changes 1 and 2 for more information on categories of costs identified. Any rows that do not apply to your activity may be left blank. However, totals reported should reflect all costs, exclusive of salary and depreciation.

Table 2 - Servict:s/Supplies Cost Data

Activity Name: Bureau of Naval Personnel Detachment UIC: N68482 Drub and Alcohol Program Management Activity (DAPMA)

FY 1996 Cost Category Projected Costs ($000) Travel: 157 Material and Supplies (including equipment): 17 Industrial Fund Purchases (other DBOF purchases): 85 Transportation: 0 Other Purchases (Contract support, etc.): 2,361 Total: 2,620 I DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

3. Contractor Workvears.

a. On-Base Contract Workyear Table. Provide a projected estimate of the number of contract workyears expected to be Derformed "on base" in support of the .installation during FY 1996. Information should represent an annual estimate on a full-time equivalency basis. Several categories of contract support have been identified in the table below. While some of the categories are self-explanatory, please note that the category " mission support" entails management support, labor service and other mission support contracting efforts, e.g., aircraft maintenance, RDT&E support, technical services in support of aircraft and ships, etc.

Table 3 - Contract Workyears

Activity Name: Bureau of Naval Personnel Detachment UIC: N68482 Drug and Alcohol Program Management Activity (DAPMA)

FY 1996 Estimated Number of Contract Type Workyears On-Base Construction: 0 Facilities Support: 0 Mission Support: 0 Procurement: 0 Other: * 0 Total Workyears: 0

* Note: Provide a brief narrative description of the type(s) of contracts, if any, included under the "Other" category. DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

b. Potential Disposition of On-Base Contract Workyears. If the mission/functions of your activity were relocated to another site, what would be the anticipated disposition of the on-base contract workvears identified in Table 3.?

1) Estimated number of contract workyears which would be transferred to the receiving site (This number should reflect the number of jobs which would in the future be contracted for at the receiving site, not an estimate of the number of people who would move or an indication that work would necessarily be done by the same con tractor(s)):

2) Estimated number of workyears which would be eliminated:

3) Estimated number of contract workyears which would remain in place (i.e., contract would remain in place in current location even if activity were relocated outside of the local area): DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

c. "Off-Base" Contract Workyear Data. Are there any contract workyears located in the local community, but not on-base, which would either be eliminated or relocated if your activity were to be closed or relocated? If so, then provide the following information (ensure that numbers reported below do not double count numbers included in 3.a. and 3.b., above):

No. of Additional Con tract Workyears General 'Type of Work Performed on Contract (e.g., Which Would Be engineering support, technical services, etc.) Eliminated

N/ A 0 -

No. of Additional Contract Workyears General Type of Work Performed on Contract (e.g., Which Would Be engineering support, technical services, etc.) Relocated

N/ A 0 I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

NEXT ECHELON LEVEL (if a~~licable

NAME (Please type or print Signature ? .., -

Title Date

Activity ' I certify that the infoxmation contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

NEXT ECHELON LEVEL (if a~~licable)

NAME (Please type of print -- Signature

Title , , Date

Activity In certify that the information herein is accurate and complete to the.best of my knowledge and belief.

MAJOR CLAIMANT LEVEL

R. J. ZLATOPER, VADM NAME (Please type or print

CHIEF OF XAVAL PERSONNEL -- Title Date

BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNEL Activity I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge belief. DEPUTY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS (LOGISTICS) DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF (INSTALLATION .W. A. EARNER NAME (Please type of print Signature- , ,

I, Title Date BRAC-95 CERTIFICATION

Reference: SECNAV NOTE 11000 dtd 8 Dec 93 In accordance with policy set forth by the Secretary of the Navy, personnel of the Department of the Navy, uniformed and civilian, who provide information for use in the BRAC-95 process are required to provide a signed certification that states "I certify . that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.' The signing of-thiscertification constitutes a representation that the certifying official has reviewed the information and either (1) personally vouches for its accuracy and completeness or (2) has possession of, and is relying upon, a certification executed by a competent subordinate. - Each individual in your activity generating information for the BRAC-95 process must certify that information. Enclosure (1) is provided for individual certifications and may be duplicated as necessary. You are directed to maintain those certifications at your activity for audit purposes. For purposes of this certification sheet, the commander of the activity will begin the certification process and each reporting senior in the Chain of Command reviewing the information will also sign this certification sheet. This sheet must remain attached to this package and be forwarded up the Chain of Command. Copies must be retained by each level in the Chain of Command for audit purposes. I certify the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

ACTIVITY COMMANDER

1.. J. VAN BUSKIRK, CDR, USN NAME (Please type of print)

OFFICER IN CHARGE Title Date

BUPERS DET DAPIIA (68482) Activity DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

Activity Information:

Activity Name: NEPMU--5

UIC: 0546A J Host Activity Name (if 1 response is for a tenant activity): Host Activity UIC: I General Instructions/Background. A separate response to this data call must be completed for each Department of the Navy (DON) host, independent and tenant activity which separately budgets BOS costs (regardless of appropriation), and, is located in the United States, its territories or possessions.

1. Base O~eratin~Sup~ort (BOS) Cost Data. Data is required whicK captures the total annual cost of operating and maintaining Department of the Navy @ON) shore installations. Information, must reflect Fk' 1996 budget data supporting the FY 1996 NAVCOMPT Budget Submit. Two tables are provided. Table 1A identifies "Other than DBOF Overhead" BOS costs and Table 1B identifies "DBOF Overhead" BOS costs. These tables must be completed, as appropriate, for all DON host, independent or tenant activities which separately budget BQS costs (regardless of appropriation), and. are located in the United States, its territories or possessions. Responses for DBOF activities may need to include both Table 1A and 1B to ensure that all BOS costs, including those incurred by the activity in support of tenants, are identified. If both table 1A and 1B are submitted for a single DON activity, please ensure that no data is double counted (that is, included on both Table 1A and 1B). The following tables are designed to collect all BOS costs currently budgeted, regardless of appropriation, e.g., Operations and Maintenance, Research and Development, Military Personnel, etc. Data must reflect FY 1996 and should be reported in thousands of dollars.

a. Table 1A - Base Operating Support Costs (Other Than DBOF Overhead). This Table should be completed to identi@ "Other Than DBOF Overhead" Costs. Display, in the format shown on the table, the O&M, R&D and MPN resources currently budgeted for BOS services. O&M cost data must be consistent with data provided on the BS-1 exhibit. Report only direct funding for the activity. Host activities should not include reimbursable support provided to tenants, since tenants will be separately reporting these costs. Military personnel costs should be included on the appropriate lines of the table. Please ensure that individual lines of the table do not include duplicate costs. Add DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

additional lines to the table (following line 2j., as necessary, to identify any additional cost elements not currently shown). Leave shaded areas of table blank. DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

b. Funding Source. If data shown on Table 1A reflects more than one appropriation, then please provide a break out of the total shown for the "3. Grand-Total" line, by appropriation:

Appropriation Amount ($0001

c. Table 1B - Base Operating Support Costs (DBOF Overhead). This Table should be submitted for all current DBOF activities. Costs reported should reflect BOS costs supporting the DBOF activity itself (usually included in the G&A cost of the activity). For DBOF activities which are tenants on another installation, total cost of BOS incurred by the tenant activity for itself should be shown on this table. It is recognized that differences exist among DBOF activity groups regarding the costing of base operatipg support: some groups reflect all such costs only in general and administrative (G&A), While others spread them between G&A and production overhead. Regardless of the costing process, all such costs should be included on Table IB. The Minor Construction portion of the FY 1996 capital budget should be included on the appropriate line. Military personnel costs (at civilian equivalency rates) should also be included on the appropriate lines of the table. Please ensure that individual lines of the table do not include duplicate costs. Also ensure that there is no duplication'between data provided on Table 1A. and 1B. These two tables must be mutually exclusive, since in those cases where both tables are submitted for an activity, the two tables will be added together to estimate total BOS costs at the activity. Add additional lines to the table (following line 21., .as necessary, to identify any additional cost elements not currently shown). Leave shaded areas of table blank.

Other Notes: All costs of operating the five Major Range Test Facility Bases at DBOF activities (even if direct RDT&E funded) should be included on Table 1B. Weapon Stations should include underutilized plant capacity costs as a DBOF overhead "BOS expense" on Table 1B.. DA'TA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

Table 1B - Base Operating Support Costs (DBOF Overhead)

I Activity Name: NEPMU-5 UIC: fl5hhA I I 1 , FY 1996 Net Cost From UC/FUND-4 ($000) Category F Non-Labor Labor 1 Total

------1. Real Property Maintenance Costs: 1 a. Real Property Maintenance (>$15K) I b. Real Property Maintenance (<$15K)

I c. Minor Construction (Expensed) Id. Minor Construction (Capital Budget) lc. Sub-total la. through Id.

2. Other Base Operating Support Costs: 2a. Command Office 2b. ADP Support 2c. Equipment Maintenance 2d. Civilian Personnel 5krvices 2e. Accounting/Finance 2f. Utilities

11 3. Depreciation I I I 11 11 4. Grand Total (sum of.lc.. 2m.. and 3.) : I I 07/14/94 12:07 Q619 556 7071 NEPIUS SAN DIEGO @I003

. INSTALLATION RESOURCES

2. Services/Sqg~llcjCost Data. The pwosc of Table 2 is to provide information about projected BY 1996 costs for the purchase of services and qpliem by the activity. (Note: Unlike Qudon 1 and Tables 1A and 1B, above, this queetion b not limited to overhead costa.) The source for this information, where possible, ahould be either the NAVCOMPT OP-32 Budget Exhibit for O&M activitica or the NAVCOMPT UC/FUND- 1AF-4 exhibit for DBOF activities. Information must reflect FY 1996 budget d&i supporting the N 1996 NAVCOMPT Budget Submit. Break out cost data by the maja sub-headings identifted on the OP-32 or UC/FWND-1AF-4axhibit, disregarding the sub- headings on the exhibit which apply to civilian and military salary wsts and aCrpreCiation, Please note that while the OP-32 exhibit aggregritet~information by budget activity, thls daia call requests OP-32 data for the rcspondiflO to tha daca call. Rcfcr to NAVCOMPTINST 7102.2B of 23 April 1990, Subj: Guidance for the Piepadon, Submissim and Review of the Depevtmcnt of the Navy @ON) Budget Estimates (DON Budget Guidance Manual) with Changes 1 and 2 for more informaton on categories of casts iddcd. Any rows that do not apply to your activity may be left blank. However, totals reported should reflect all costs, exclusive of salary and depreciation,

Coat Category DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

3. Contractor Workvean.

a. On-Base Contract Workyear 'Table. Provide a projected estimate of the number of contract workyears expected to be performed "on base" in support of the installation during FY 1996. Information should represent an annual estimate on a full-time equivalency basis. Several categories of contract%upport have been identified in the table below. While some of the categories are self-explanatory, please note that the category "mission support" entails management support, labor service and other mission support contracting efforts, e.g., aircraft maintenance, RDT&E suppart, technical services in support of aircraft and ships, etc.

Table 3 - Contract Worhyears

Activity Name: NEPMU-5 UIC: 521546A

FY 1996 Estimated Wurnber of Contract Type Workyears On-Base Construction:

* Note: Provide a brief narrative description of the type(s) of contracts, if any, included under the "Other" category. DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

b. Potential Disposition of On-Base Contract Workyears. If the mission,functions of your activity were relocated to another site, what would be the anticipated disposition of the on-base contract workvears identified in Table 3.?

1) Estimated number of contract workvears which would be transferred to the receiving site (This number should react the number of jobs which would in the future be contracted for at the receiving site, not an estimate of the number of people who would move or an indication that work would necessarily be done by the same contractor(s)):

2) Estimated number of workvears which would be eliminated:

3) Estimated number of contract workvears which would remain in dace (i.e., contract would remain in place in current location even if activity were relocated . , outside of the ha1 area): DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

c. "Off-Base" Contract Workyear Data. Are there any contract workyears located in the local community, but not on-base, which would either be eliminated or relocated if your activity were to be closed or relocated? If so, then provide the following information (ensure that numbers reported below do not double count numbers included in 3.a. and 3.b., above):

No. of Additional Contract Workyedrs General Type of Work Performed on Contract (e.g., Which Would Be engineering support, technical services, etc.) Eliminated

NA L

a No. of Additional Contract Workyears . * General Type of Work Performed on Contract (e.g., Which Would Be . ' engineering support, technical services, etc.) Relocated NC. 328 CQ2

In accordance w~thpolicy set Qnh by the Smretary of the Kavy. ~mrsonnolof the hputn~cnt of the Navy, uniformed ml civilian, who pmvide j~lfomntionf~r rase in the HKAC-95 prows am nquird to provide a siyrled ccrtificstion thrt Yiatcs "1 oortiPy thnl the infbrmation cutrtained herein is aaUTBte ad~omplelc to rhc best of my k~lowlcdgeand belief,"

hz niyiil~goi' this certiiicatica oonstitutev n nprcmc~tionthm lllc cwtifying oflicial hag reviewed tile infannation 8nd cilJla (i ) polronall~b.ouchae for its acauray and complotenc~~or (2) has possrsri~rnof. md is rely if^^ upon, a axciricn~ionexccuied by n competent stibordinau.

Ea:r: .z,:iviJua( in your activi~ygencmting infannation tor the BR AC-95 process must ~ertifv ttxt inf~imittiori, bncIosure (I) is provided for inllividwl ccnfftcil~ic~tnsand ma!: be duplicated necr.c;suy. Yau are dhclad to mriintein those ce,.tlfications at yvrlr activiy for audit purposes, Fcr p~lrposcs of'this ie~ifi~;a;ibn~hdat, the a,~n;l~atld~rof the wtivity will begfd the zcrSifi0ation pro:.es$ ad c~chrepsttiny senior 111 the Chritl of Command revie\ving the infirmnuon will alsc ri8;) this Csrtification ~hwt.This sheet must remain atached tn this package and bc forwarded up ttta Chain of Commmtl. Copies must he rained by each lebei in tho Chrin 01' Clc~tlrnlindfor rudir jurposcs.

I certity that .:ha iilfonnation coarainad hercia is occurlllr? and oomplete (11 the best cf my knc~wlcdgo 4 and belief,

E. L. SMITH ---- - .- - KAME please tyyc or pnmj sig~ture OFFICER IN CHARGE 03 AUG 94 - - . .- Title Date NAVY ENVIROF@ENTAL & PREVENTIVE MEDICINE UNIT #5 - .- - Actir ity r, I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. NEXT ECHELON LEVEL (if applicable) M. R. MUNSON .= .= Signature NAME (Please type or print) COMPTROLLER 15 July 1994 Title Date

ENV-HER ENV-HER / Activity

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. NEXT ECHELON LEVEL (if applicable)

NAME (Please type or print) Signature

Title Date

Activity

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

HAROLD M. KOENIG, RADM,MC,USN NAME (Please type or print) ACTING CHIEF BUMED Title BUREAU OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY Activity

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. DEPUTY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS (LOGISTICS) DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF (INSTALLATIONS & LOGISTICS) vv'. A. EARNER .

NAME (Please type or print) Signature

Title Date DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

Activitv Information: Activity Name: Naval Telecommunications Center (NTCC) 32nd Street UIC: Host Activity Name (if Naval Station, San Diego, CA response is for a tenant activity): ------Host Activity UIC:

General Instructions/Background. A separate response to this data call must be completed for each Department of the Navy @ON) host, independent and tenant activity which separately budgets BOS costs (regardless of appropriation), d,is located in the United States, its territories or possessions.

1. Base O~eratingSUDDO~~ (BOS) Cost Data. Data is required which captures the total annual cost of operating and maintaining Department of the Navy (DON) shore installations. Information must reflect FY 1996 budget data supporting the FY 1996 NAVCOMPT Budget Submit. Two tables are provided. Table 1A identifies "Other than DBOF Overhead" BOS costs and Table 1B identifies "DBOF Overhead" BOS costs. These tables must be completed, as appropriate, for all DON host, independent or tenant activities which separately budget BOS costs (regardless of appropriation), a,are located in the United States, its territories or possessions. Responses for DBOF activities may need to include both Table 1A and 1B to ensure that all BOS costs, including those incurred by the activity in support of tenants, are identified. If both table 1A and 1B are submitted for a single DON activity, please ensure that no data is double counted (that is, included on hQth Table 1A and 1B). The following tables are designed to collect all BOS costs currently budgeted, regardless of appropriation, e.g., Operations and Maintenance, Research and Development, Military Personnel, etc. Data must reflect FY 1996 and should be reported in thousands of dollars. a. Table 1A - Base Operating Support Costs (Other Than DBOF Overhead). This Table should be completed to identify "Other Than DBOF Overhead" Costs. Display, in the format shown on the table, the O&M, R&D and MPN resources currently budgeted for BOS services. O&M cost data must be consistent with data provided on the BS-1 exhibit. Report only direct funding for the activity. Host activities should not include reimbursable support provided to tenants, since tenants will be separately reporting these costs. Military personnel costs should be included on the appropriate lines of the table. Please ensure that individual lines of the table do not include duplicate costs. Add additional DATA CALL 66 XNST.4UTIQN RESOURCES lines to the table ifoll~wb~gLiue 2j., as u=uy7 to identify any addtiollal wst ekn~i~tsilor currently shown). have shaded areas of table blank, DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

b. Funding Source. If data shown on Table 1A reflects more than one appropriation, then please provide a break out of the total shown for the "3. Grand-Total" line, by appropriation:

Ap~ro~riation Amount ($000)

c. Table 1B - Base Operating Support Costs (DBOF Overhead). This Table should be submitted for all current DBOF activities. Costs reported should reflect BOS costs supporting the DBOF activity itself (usually included in the G&A cost of the activity). For DBOF activities which are tenants on another installation, total cost of BOS incurred by the tenant activity for itself should be shown on this table. It is recognized that differences exist among DBOF activity groups regarding the costing of base operating support: some groups reflect all such costs only in general and administrative (G&A), while others spread them between G&A and production overhead. Regardless of the costing process, all such costs should be included on Table 1B. The Minor Construction portion of the FY 1996 capital budget should be included on the appropriate line. Military personnel costs (at civilian equivalency rates) should also be included on the appropriate lines of the table. Please ensure that individual lines of the table do not include duplicate costs. Also ensure that there is no duplication between data provided on Table 1A. and 1B. These two tables must be mutually exclusive, since in those cases where both tables are submitted for an activity, the two tables will be added together to estimate total BOS costs at the activity. Add additional lines to the table (following line 21., as necessary, to identify any additional cost elements not currently shown). Leave shaded areas of table blank,

Other Note$: All costs of operating the five Major Range Test Facility Bases at DBOF activities (even if direct RDT&E funded) should be included on Table 1B. Weapon Stations should include underutilized plant capacity costs as a DBOF overhead "BOS expense" on Table 1B.. DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES DATA CALL 66 INSTALLA'TION RESOURCES

2. ServicesISu~pliesCost DaQ. The purpose of Table 2 is to provide information about projected FY 1996 costs for the purchase of services and supplies by the activity. (Note: Unlike Question 1 and Tables 1A and lB, above, this question is not limited to overhead costs.) The source for this information, where possible, should be either the NAVCOMPT. OP-32 Budget Exhibit for O&M activities or the NAVCOMPT. UCIFUND-1IIF-4 exhibit for DBOF activities. Information must reflect FY 1996 budget data supporting the FY 1996 NAVCOMPT Budget Submit. Break out cost data by the major sub-headings identified on the OP-32 or UCIFUND-IIIF-4 exhibit, disregarding the sub-headings on the exhibit which apply to civilian and military salary costs and depreciation. Please note that while the OP-32 exhibit aggregates information by budget activity, this data call requests OP-32 data for the activity responding to the data call. Refer to NAVCOMPTINST 7102.2B of 23 April 1990, Subj: Guidance for the Preparation, Submission and Review of the Department of the Navy @ON) Budget Estimates @ON Budget Guidance Manual) with Changes 1 and 2 for more information on categories of costs identified. Any rows that do not apply to your activity may be left blank. However, totals reported should reflect all costs, exclusive of salary and depreciation.

Table 2 - ServicesISupplies Cast Data Activity Name: NTCC 32ND STREET UIC: 70240

FY 1996 Cost Category Projected Costs (woo) Travel: Material and Supplies (including equipment): 2.4 - - Industrial Fund Purchases (other DBOF purchases): Transportation: Other Purchases (Contract support, etc.): 4.7 Total: 7.1 DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

3. Contractor Workvears.

a. On-Base Contract Workyear Table. Provide a projected estimate of the number of contract workyears expected to be performed "on base" in support of the installation during FY 1996. Information should represent an annual estimate on a full-time equivalency basis. Several categories of contract suppart have been identified in the table below. While some of the categories are self-explanatory, please note that the category "mission support" entails management support, labor service and other mission support contracting efforts, e.g., aircraft maintenance, RDT&E support, technical services in support of aircraft and ships, etc. N/A r Table 3 - Contract Workyears Activity Name: NTCC 32ND STREET UIC: 70240

FY 1996 Estimated Number of Contract Type Workyears On-Base Construction: Facilities Support: Mission Support: Procurement: Other: * Total Workyears: 0

* Note: Provide a brief narrative description of the type(s) of contracts, if any, included under the "Other" category. DA'TA CALL 66 1NSTALLA.TION RESOURCES

b. Potential Disposition of On-Base Contract Workyears. If the mission/functions of your activity were relocated to another site, what would be the anticipated disposition of the on-base contract workvean identified in Table 3.?

1) Estimated number of contract workyears which would be transferred to the receiving site (This number should reflect the number of jobs which would in the future be contracted for at the receiving site, not an estimate of the number of people who would move or an indication that work would necessarily be done by the same contractor(s)):

2) Estimated number of workvears which would be eliminated:

3) Estimated number of contract workyears which would remain in ~laq(i.e., contract would remain in place in current location even if activity were relocated outside of the local area): DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

c. l'Off-BasewContract Workyear Data. Are there any contract workyears located in the local community, but not on-base, which would either be eliminated or relocated if your activity were to be closed or relocated? If so, then provide the following information (ensure that numbers reported below do not double count numbers included in 3.a. and 3.b., above):

T No. of Additional Contract Workyears General Type of Work Performed on Contract (e.g., Which Would Be engineering support, technical services, etc.) Eliminated

0

No. of Additional Contract Workyears General Type of Work Performed on Contract (e.g., Which Would Be engineering support, technical services, etc .) Relocated 0 INSTALLATION RESOURCES, DATA CALL 66 for COMNAVCOMTELCOM

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. NEXT ECHELON LEVEL (if applicable)

NAME (Please type or print) Signature

Title Date

- - Activity

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. NEXT ECHELON LEVEL (if applicable)

Name (Please type or print) Signature ...... Title Date

Activity

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Commander, 25 AUP 1994 Title Date Naval Computer and Telecommunications Command Activity

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. DEPUTY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS (LOGISTICS) DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF (INSTALL *.A. EARNER NAME (Please type or print) Signature

Title Date DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

Activity Information: > Activity Name: NCTS S. Diego Det Chollas Heights, CA UIC : 70240 Host Activity Name (if Naval Station San Diego response is for a tenant activity): Host Activity UIC: 00245

General Instructions/Background. A separate response to this data call must be completed for each Department of the Navy (DON) host, independent and tenant activity which separately budgets BOS costs (regardless of appropriation), &, is located in the United States, its territories or possessions.

1. Base Operatinp Su~~ort(BOS) Cost Data. Data is required which captures the total annual cost of operating and maintaining Department of the Navy @ON) shore installations. Information must reflect FY 1996 budget data supporting the FY 1996 NAVCOMPT Budget Submit. Two tables are provided. Table 1A identifies "Other than DBOF Overhead" BOS costs and Table 1B identifies "DBOF Overhead" BOS costs. These tables must be completed, as appropriate, for all DON host, independent or tenant activities which separately budget BOS costs (regardless of appropriation), u,are located in the United States, its territories or possessions. Responses for DBOF activities may need to include both Table 1A and 1B to ensure that all BOS costs, including those incurred by the activity in support of tenants, are identified. If both table 1A and 1B are submitted for a single DON activity, please ensure that no data is double counted (that is, included on hQth Table 1A and 1B). The following tables are designed to collect all BOS costs currently budgeted, regardless of appropriation, e.g., Operations and Maintenance, Research and Development, Military Personnel, etc. Data must reflect FY 1996 and should be reported in thousands of dollars.

a. Table 1A - Base Operating Support Costs (Other Than DBOF Overhead). This Table should be completed to identify "Other Than DBOF Overhead" Costs. Display, in the format shown on the table, the O&M, R&D and MPN resources currently budgeted for BOS services. O&M cost data must be consistent with data provided on the BS-1 exhibit. Report only direct funding for the activity. Host activities should not include reimbursable support provided to tenants, since tenants will be separately reporting these costs. Military personnel costs should be included on the appropriate lines of the table. Please ensure that individual lines of the table do not include duplicate costs. Add additional lines to the table (following line 2j., as necessary, to identify any additional cost elements not currently shown). Leave shaded areas of table blank, DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

b. Funding Source. If data shown on Table 1A reflects more than one appropriation, then please provide a break out of the total shown for the "3. Grand-Total" line, by appropriation:

Avpro~riation Amount ($000)

c. Table 1B - Base Operating Support Costs (DBOF Overhead). This Table should be submitted for all current DBOF activities. Costs reported should reflect BOS costs supporting the DBOF activity itself (usually included in the G&A cost of the activity). For DBOF activities which are tenants on another installation, total cost of BOS incurred by the tenant activity for itself should be shown on this table. It is recognized that differences exist among DBOF activity groups regarding the costing of base operating support: some groups reflect all such costs only in general and administrative (G&A), while others spread them between G&A and production overhead. Regardless of the costing process, all such costs should be included on Table 1B. The Minor Construction portion of the FY 1996 capital budget should be included on the appropriate line. Military personnel costs (at civilian equivalency rates) should also be included on the appropriate lines of the table. Please ensure that individual lines of the table do not include duplicate costs. Also ensure that there is no duplication between data provided on Table 1A. and 1B. These two tables must be mutually exclusive, since in those cases where both tables are submitted for an activity, the two tables will be added together to estimate total BOS costs at the activity. Add additional lines to the table (following line 21., as necessary, to identify any additional cost elements not currently shown). Leave shaded areas of table blank,

Other Notes: All costs of operating the five Major Range Test Facility Bases at DBOF activities (even if direct RDT&E funded) should be included on Table 1B. Weapon Stations should include underutilized plant capacity costs as a DBOF overhead "BOS expense" on Table 1B.. DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

2h. Police and Fire DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

2. ServicesISu~.The purpose of Table 2 is to provide information about projected FY 1996 costs for the purchase of services and supplies by the activity. (Note: Unlike Question 1and Tables 1A and lB, above, this question is not limited to overhead costs.) The source for this information, where possible, should be either the NAVCOMPT OP-32 Budget Exhibit for O&M activities or the NAVCOMPT UCIFUND-IIIF-4 exhibit for DBOF activities. Information must reflect FY 1996 budget data supporting the FY 1996 NAVCOMPT Budget Submit. Break out cost data by the major sub-headings identified on the OP-32 or UCIFUND-1IIF-4 exhibit, disregarding the sub-headings on the exhibit which apply to civilian and military salary costs and depreciation. Please note that while the OP-32 exhibit aggregates information by budget activity, this data call requests OP-32 data for the activity responding to the data call. Refer to NAVCOMPTINST 7102.2B of 23 April 1990, Subj: Guidance for the Preparation, Submission and Review of the Department of the Navy (DON) Budget Estimates @ON Budget Guidance Manual) with Changes 1 and 2 for more information on categories of costs identified. Any rows that do not apply to your activity may be left blank. However, totals reported should reflect all costs, exclusive of salary and depreciation.

Table 2 - Services/Supplies Cost Data Activity Name: NCTS S Diego Det Chollas Heights UIC: 70240

FY 1996 Cost Category Projected Costs ($ooo) Travel: Material and Supplies (including equipment): Industrial Fund Purchases (other DBOF purchases): Transportation: Other Purchases (Contract support, etc.): Total: 0 * DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

3. Contractor Workvears.

a. On-Base Contract Workyear Table. Provide a projected estimate of the number of contract workyears expected to be performed 'on basemin support of the installation during FY 1996. Information should represent an annual estimate on a full-time equivalency basis. Several categories of contract support have been identified in the table below. While some of the categories are self-explanatory, please note that the category "mission support" entails management support, labor service and other mission support contracting efforts, e.g., aircraft maintenance, RDT&E support, technical services in support of aircraft and ships, etc. N/A

* Note: Provide a brief narrative description of the type(s) of contracts, if any, included under the "Other" category. DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

b. Potential Disposition of On-Base Contract Workyears. If the mission/functions of your activity were relocated to another site, what would be the anticipated disposition of the on-base contract workyean identified in Table 3.?

1) Estimated number of contract workyears which would be transferred to the receiving site (This number should reflect the number of jobs which would in the future be contracted for at the receiving site, not an estimate of the number of people who would move or an indication that work would necessarily be done by the same contractor(s)):

2) Estimated number of workyears which would be eliminate&

3) Estimated number of contract workyears which would remain in la^ (i.e., contract would remain in place in current location even if activity were relocated outside of the local area): DATA CALL 66 INSTALLATION RESOURCES

c. "Off-Base"Contract Workyear Data. Are there any contract workyears located in the community, but not on-base, which would either be eliminated or relocated if your activity were to be closed or relocated? If so, then provide the following information (ensure that numbers reported below do not double count numbers included in 3.a. and 3.b., above):

No. of Additional Contract Workyears General Type of Work Performed on Contract (e.g., Which Would Be engineering support, technical services, etc .) Eliminated 0

No. of Additional Contract Workyears General Type of Work Performed on Contract (e.g., Which Would Be engineering support, technical services, etc.) Relocated 0 INSTALLATION RESOURCES, DATA CALL 66 for COMNAVCOMTELCOM

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. NEXT ECHELON LEVEL (if applicable)

NAME (Please type or print) Signature

Title Date

Activity

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. NEXT ECHELON LEVEI. (if applicable)

Name (Please type or print) Signature ...... Title Date

Activity

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. JMAJOR CLAIMANT LEVEL

T. A. STARK Name (Please type or print) Commander, 25 AUP 1994 Title Date Naval Computer and Teiecommunications Command Activity

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. DEPUTY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS (LOGISTICS) DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF (INSTALLATI b. A. EARNER NAME (Please type or print) Signature

Title Date Document Separator DATA CALL 64 CONSTRUCTION COST AVOIDANCES Table 1: Military Construction (MILCON) Projects (Excluding Family Housing Construction Projects)

SAN DIEGO CA NS Unit Identification Code (UIC): NO0245 Major Claimant: 11 PACFLT Project Project Project Cost Avoid FY No. Description APPn ($000) - 1993 323R PIER UPGRADE * BRAC 260' Sub-Total - 1993 260

CHAPEL/RELIGIOUS EDUCATION 1995 111 FACILITY * MCON 915 Sub-Total - 1995 915

APPLIED INSTRUCTION 1996 023T BUILDING BRAC 8,403

1996 186 OILY WST COLL & TREAT FAC MCON 22,200 Sub-Total - 1996 30,603

1997 244 OILY WASTE COLL FAC MCON 25,390

1997 254 BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS MCON 36,500

1997 280 PIER UTILITY UPGRADE MCON 2,300

1997 331 PIER 6 UPGRADE MCON 5,900 Sub-Total - 1997 70,090

1998 302 PERIMETER SECURITY LIGHTNG MCON 800 Sub-Total - 1998 800 ------

1999 333 CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER MCON 2,200

(Revtsed 9 Dee 94) p - Cost Avotdance u less than project programmed amount) (Page 229) DATA CALL 64 CONSTRUCTION COST AVOIDANCES Table 1: Military Construction (MILCON) Projects (Excluding Family Housing Construction Projects)

Installation Name: SAN DIEGO CA NS Unit Identification Code (UIC): Major Claimant: PACFLT Project Project Project Cost Avoid N No. Description APP~ ($000)

Sub-Total - 1999 2,200

2000 345 QUAYWALL MCON 14,400 Sub-Total - 2000 14,400

2001 096 VEHICULAR OVERPASS MCON 5,700

2001 216 FLEET RECREiZTION CTR MCON 1,300 Sub-Total - 2001 7,000

Grand Total 126,268

-

(Revised 9 Dec 94) (* - Cost Avoidance is less than project programmed amowu) (Page 230) BRAC-95 CERTIFICATION

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

MICHAEL D. THORNTON s NAME (Please type or print) Signature CDR, CEC, USN 9eo 99 Title Date

MILCON PROGRAMMING DIVISION Division

NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND Activity I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

MAJOR CLAIMANT LEVEL

J. E. BUFFINGTON, RADM, CEC, USN NAME (Please type or print) COMMANDER Title Date

NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND Activity

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

DEPUTY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS (LOGISTICS) DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF (JNSTALLATIONS & LOGISTICS)

NAME (Please type or print) Signature

Title Date Document Separator DATA CALL 64 CONSTRUCTION COST AVOIDANCES Table 1: Military Construction (MILCON) Projects (Excluding Family Housing Construction Projects)

Installation Name: SAN DIEGO CA OCEANCOMFAC Unit Identification Code (UIC) : N63037 ------Major Claimant: NAVOCEAN Project Project Project Cost Avoid FY No. Description APP~ ($ow

2001 635 OCEANOGRAPHY BUILDING MCON 3,91! Sub-Total - 2001 3,91!

Grand Total 3,91!

A (Page 234) I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

MAJOR CLAIMANT LEVEL

J. E. BUFFINGTON, RADM, CEC, USN NAME (Please type or print) COMMANDER Title Date

NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND Activity

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

DEPUTY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS (LOGISTICS) DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF (INSTALLATIONS & LOGISTICS)

W. A EARNER 3 *t?

NAME (Please type or print) Signature

Title Date I BRAC-95 CERTIFICATION I certify that the information contained complete to the best of my knowledge and beli MARK E. DONALDSON NAME (Please type or print) CDR, CEC, USN (L JJ~, (qq~ Title Date MILCON PROGRAMMING DIVISION Division FACILITIES PROGRAMMING AND CONSTRUCTION DIRECTORATE Department

NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND ch Activity

Enclosure (1) BRAC DATA CALL NUMBER 64 CONSTRUCTION COST AVOIDANCE

Information on cost avoidance which could be realized as the result of cancellation of on- going or programmed construction projects is provided in Tables 1 (MILCON) and 2 (FAMILY HOUSING). These tables list MILCON/FAMILY HOUSING projects which fall within the following categories:

1. all programmed construction projects included in the FY 1996 - 2001 MILCON/FAMILY HOUSING Project List,

2. all programmed projects fiom FY 1995 or earlier for which cost avoidance could still be obtained if the project were to be canceled by 1 OCT 1995, and,

3. all programmed BRAC MILCON/FAMILY HOUSING projects for which cost avoidance could still be obtained if the project were to be canceled by 1 OCT 1995.

Projects listed in Tables 1 and 2 with potential cost avoidance were determined as meeting any one of the following criteria:

Projects with projected Work in Place (WIP) less than 75% of the Current Working Estimate (CWE) as of 1 OCT 1995 .

Projects with projected completion dates or Beneficial Occupancy Dates subsequent to 3 1 March 1996.

Projects with projected CWE amount greater than $1 5M.

The estimated cost avoidance for projects terminated after construction award would be approximately one-half of the CWE for the remaining work. Close-out, claims and other termination costs can consume the other half Document Separator DATA CALL 64 CONSTRUCTION COST AVOIDANCES OMILCON) Projects (Excluding Family Housing

SAN DIEGO CA NS NO0245 Major Claimant: . PACFLT \ Project Project Project Cost Avoid FY No. Description APPn ($ooo) ACTIVITIES MCON 1995 111 1,830 Sub-TOhyl 1995 1,830

1996 023T BRAC 8,403 1996 186 MCON 30,900 39,303

\ 1997 244 OILY WASTE COLL FAC MCON 25,130 Sub-Total - 1997 25,130

1999 278 PIER UPGRADE MCON 10,300 1999 280 PIER UTILITY UPGRADE \, MCON 2,300 1999 302 PERIMETER SECURITY LIGHTNG 900 - -- - 1999 331 PIER UPGRADE 5,900 1999 333 CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER 2,200 Sub-Total - 1999 21,600 \

2000 279 PIER UPGRADE MCON 2000 345 QUAYWALL MCON I\,, 400

\ Sub-Total - 2000 23,400 ------(Page 232) DATA CALL 64 CONSTRUCTION COST AVOIDANCES Table 1: Military Construction (MILCON) Projects (Excluding Family Housing Construction Projects)

Installation Name: SAN DIEGO CA NS Unit Identification Code (UIC): Major Claimant: PACFLT Project Project Project Cost Avoid FY No. Description APP~ ($ooo)

2001 094 WATERFRONT OPERATIONS MCON 2,925 2001 096 VEHICULAR OVERPASS MCON 5,700 2001 216 FLEET RECREATION CTR MCON 1,300 2001 258 EMPLOYEES PARKING BUILDING MCON 15,010

2001 304 FLD HSE & INDOOR SWMG POOL MCON 3,850 2001 346 PARK GAR/NEX COMMISSARY CP MCON 13,500 ------Sub-Total - 2001 42,285

Grand Total 153,548

(page 233) I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

MAJOR CLAIMANT LEVEL

J. E. BUFFDIGTON, RADM, CEC, USN NAME (Please type or print) COMMANDER Title Date

NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND Activity

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

DEPUTY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS (LOGISTICS) DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF (INSTALLATIONS & LOGISTICS)

W. A. EARNER c;b "J

NAME (Please type or print) Signature

Title Date I BRAC-95 CERTIFICATION I certify that the information contained complete to the best of my knowledge and beli

MARK E. DONALDSON NAME (Please type or print) Signature CDR, CEC, USN Iz. '~~1,1q74 Title Date MILCON PROGRAMMING DIVISION Division

FACILITIES PROGRAMMING AND CONSTRUCTION DIRECTORATE Department 3

NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMANI) c- Activity

Enclosure (1) BRAC DATA CALL NUMBER 64 CONSTRUCTION COST AVOIDANCE

Information on cost avoidance which could be realized as the result of cancellation of on- going or programmed construction projects is provided in Tables 1 (MILCON) and 2 (FAMILY HOUSING). These tables list MILCON/FAMILY HOUSING projects which fall within the following categories:

1. all programmed construction projects included in the FY 1996 - 200 1 MILCON/FAMILY HOUSING Project List,

2. all programmed projects from FY 1995 or earlier for which cost avoidance could still be obtained if the project were to be canceled by 1 OCT 1995, and,

3. all programmed BRAC MILCON/FAMILY HOUSING projects for which cost avoidance could still be obtained if the project were to be canceled by 1 OCT 1995.

Projects listed in Tables 1 and 2 with potential cost avoidance were determined as meeting any one of the following criteria:

Projects with projected Work in Place (WIP) less than 75% of the Current Working Estimate (CWE) as of 1 OCT 1995 .

Projects with projected completion dates or Beneficial Occupancy Dates subsequent to 3 1 March 1996.

Projects with projected CWE amount greater than $15M.

The estimated cost avoidance for projects terminated after construction award would be approximately one-half of the CWE for the remaining work. Close-out, claims and other termination costs can consume the other half Document Separator DATA CALL 64 CONSTRUCTION COST AVOIDANCES

Table I: Military Construction (MILCON) Projects (Excluding Family Housing Construction Projects). BRAC-95 CERTIFICATION

Reference: SEWNOTE 11000 dtd 8 Dec 93 In accordance with policy set forth by the Secretary of the Navy, personnel of the Department of the Navy, uniformed and civilian, who provide information for use in the BRAC-95 process are required to provide a signed certification that states "1 certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief." The signing of this certification constitutes a representation that the certifying official has reviewed the information and either (1) personally vouches for its accuracy and completeness or (2) has possession of, and is relying upon, a certification executed by a competent subordinate. Each individual in your activity generating information for the BRAC-95 process must certify that information. Enclosure (I) is provided for individual certifications and may be duplicated as necessary. You are directed to maintain those certifications at your activity for audit purposes. For purposes of this certification sheet, the commander of the activity will begin the certification process and each reporting senior in the Chain of Command reviewing the information will also sign this certification sheet. This sheet must remain attached to this package and be forwarded up the Chain of Command. Copies must be retained by each level in the Chain of Command for audit purposes. I certify the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

ACTIVITY COMMANDER

Gordon K. Dowery NAME (Please type of print) Director, DMW Title OASD (HA) Activity Document Separator BRAC-95 CERTIFICATION DATA CALL THIRTY-SEVEN

NAVSTA SAN DIEGO

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

R. J. ZLATOPER NAME (Please type or print) Commander In Chief Title

U. S. Pacific Fleet Activity

I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

DEPUTY CHIEF OF NAVAI OPERATIONS (LOGISTICS) DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF (lh'ST!ILLATlOE & LOGISTICS)

!ii\hlE (Please type or prinl) Signature

Title Date BRAC 95 DATA CALL THIRTY SEVEN REVISION NAVAL STATION SAN DIEGO I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

TYPE COMMANDER LEVEL

DATE: ,/4/9,

FORCE CIVIL ENGINEER--- - COMMANDER, NAVAL SURFACE FORCE, U.S. PACIFIC FLEET

DATE : ;b/$k FORCE FACILITIES PLANNER COMMANDER, NAVAL SURFACE FORCE, U.S. PACIFIC FLEET 25 Oct 94

From: LT R. Bergum, CPF BKAC, N46445 To : CDR R. M. Souders, BSAT

Subj : Data Call Clarificat:ions, 21 Oct 94 FAX 1. QUESTION: For NAVSTA San Diego, data call 33, question 8.h. the answer states that dredge material is not stored on the base, but does not state whether there has historically been contaminants in the dredge spc)ils. Provide response on known contaminants as requested in t.he data call. ANSWER: From CNSP - There have been no contaminants dredged. hOTl3: EYm CPF: Further research being done - will sht additional info ASAP. 26 OCT 94 - LARRY FOSTER, (BF ENVIRONMENTAL) SPOKE WITH CAP' ROACH, CNSP. TNE NAVSTA RESPONSE IS CORRECT. THERE ARE AREAS OF CONT~IONWHICH SOUTHWEST DIV (XN'lRACTS OUT FOR SAMPLING. THE CONTAMINATED AFSS ARE AVOIDED - NOT DREDGED. THERE ARE NO UPLAND DISPOSAL AREAS FOR CONT2AldINATED SPOTS. From: LT R. Bergum, CPF BRAC, N46445 To : CDR R. M. Souders, BSAT

Subj : Data Call Clarifications, 21 Oct 94 FAX 1. QUESTION: For MLVSTA San Diego, data call 33, question 8.h. the answer states that dredge material is not stored on the base, but does not state whether there has historically been contaminants in the dredge spoils. Provide response on known contaminants as requested in the data call.

ANSWER: From CNSP - There have been no contaminants dredged. N7TE: Frm CPF: Ftrther research being done - will submit additional info RSAP.

26 OCP 94 - FOSTER, (CPF ENVIFUNdENTAL) SPOKE WITII CAPT ROAaI, CNSP. THE NAVSTA RESPONSE IS CORRECT. TRERE ARE AREAS OF CQNTMINATIW WHICH SCNTHWFST DNmS WT FOR SAMPLm. TRE mmTEDAREAS ARE AWIDH, - NOT D-. TlEEE ARE NO UPLAND DISPOSAL AREAS FOR mmTEDSPOTS. 2. QUESTION: In data call 6, question 11, only NAS North Island reported piers with Roll On-Roll Off capability. Please verify that no other PACFLT Nan1 Stations have any plers with RO/RO capability.

ANSWER: From CNSP - The following stations have RO/RO capability. NAVSTA SAN DIEGO quay walls have been used, not the piers themselves. NAVSTA EXEREIT - quay walls, Norton Wharf. NAVSTA PEARL HARBOR - all wharves. 3. QUESTION: In data call 37, question 39 N?S North Island reported the closest ordnance terminal as Seal Beach. MLVSTA Sal Diego and SUBASE San Diego both reported NAS North Island as the nearest ordnance terminal. Please resolve the inconsistency in responses.

ANSWER: From CNSP - Seal Beach is primary & MIS NORTH ISLAND is secondary. ANSWER: From CNAP - NAS North Island is considered a secondary stock point for weapons with NAS as its primary customer. Though SUBASE San Diego and NAVSTA San Diego ships load out on NPS piers, they order ordnance directly through Seal Beach which the ordnance to NAS NORTH ISLAND for onload. Seal Beach is the prima? sustaining stock point and therefore the primary weapons temnal in the local area. Weapons onloaded to SURFPAC ships are FFT (For Further Transfer) from Seal Beach and, for the most part, do not originate from NPS NORTH ISLAND.