Delegation of Authority – Contracts Awarded for the Period of October 1
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Appendix 5 Station Descriptions And
Appendix 5 Station Descriptions and Technical Overview Stage 2 light rail transit (LRT) stations will follow the same standards, design principles, and connectivity and mobility requirements as Stage 1 Confederation Line. Proponent Teams were instructed, through the guidelines outlined in the Project Agreement (PA), to design stations that will integrate with Stage 1, which include customer facilities, accessibility features, and the ability to support the City’s Transportation Master Plan (TMP) goals for public transit and ridership growth. The station features planned for the Stage 2 LRT Project will be designed and built on these performance standards which include: Barrier-free path of travel to entrances of stations; Accessible fare gates at each entrance, providing easy access for customers using mobility devices or service animals; Tactile wayfinding tiles will trace the accessible route through the fare gates, to elevators, platforms and exits; Transecure waiting areas on the train platform will include accessible benches and tactile/Braille signs indicating the direction of service; Tactile warning strips and inter-car barriers to keep everyone safely away from the platform edge; Audio announcements and visual displays for waiting passengers will precede each train’s arrival on the platform and will describe the direction of travel; Service alerts will be shown visually on the passenger information display monitors and announced audibly on the public-address system; All wayfinding and safety signage will be provided following the applicable accessibility standards (including type size, tactile signage, and appropriate colour contrast); Clear, open sight lines and pedestrian design that make wayfinding simple and intuitive; and, Cycling facilities at all stations including shelter for 80 per cent of the provided spaces, with additional space protected to ensure cycling facilities can be doubled and integrated into the station’s footprint. -
NCAFA Constitution By-Laws, Rules & Regulations Page 2 of 70 Revision January 2020 DEFINITIONS to Be Added
NATIONAL CAPITAL AMATEUR FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION CONSTITUTION BY-LAWS AND RULES AND REGULATIONS January 2020 Changes from the previous version are highlighted in yellow Table of Contents DEFINITIONS ....................................................................................................... 3 1 GUIDING PRINCIPLES ................................................................................. 3 2 MEMBERSHIP .............................................................................................. 3 3 LEAGUE STRUCTURE ................................................................................. 6 4 EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS........................................................................... 10 5 ADVISORY GROUP .................................................................................... 11 6 MEETINGS .................................................................................................. 11 7 AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSTITUTION ................................................. 13 8 BY-LAWS AND REGULATIONS ................................................................ 13 9 FINANCES .................................................................................................. 14 10 BURSARIES ............................................................................................ 14 11 SANDY RUCKSTUHL VOLUNTEER OF THE YEAR AWARD ............... 15 12 VOLUNTEER SCREENING ..................................................................... 16 13 REMUNERATION ................................................................................... -
Pl180670-Apr-06-2021
Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Tribunal d’appel de l’aménagement local ISSUE DATE: April 06, 2021 CASE NO(S).: PL180670 The Ontario Municipal Board (the “OMB”) is continued under the name Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (the “Tribunal”), and any reference to the Ontario Municipal Board or Board in any publication of the Tribunal is deemed to be a reference to the Tribunal. PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 34(19) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended Appellant: Ross Meredith Appellant: Michael Olsen Appellant: Daniel Spence Appellant: Westboro Community Association Subject: By-law No. BL 2018-193 Municipality: City of Ottawa OMB Case No.: PL180670 OMB File No.: PL180670 OMB Case Name: Meredith v. Ottawa (City) HearD: Written Hearing APPEARANCES: Parties Counsel City of Ottawa (the “City”) Timothy Marc Domicile Development Inc. Alan Cohen (the “Applicant”) Meagan Brodie Ross Meredith, Michael Olsen, Kristi Ross Daniel Spencer and Westboro Community Association (the “Appellants”) 2 PL180670 DECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL DELIVERED BY DAVID L. LANTHIER AND ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL [1] This Decision follows a written hearing of the Tribunal undertaken to determine the Appeals brought by the Appellants pursuant to s. 34(19) of the Planning Act (“Act”) as it was amended by Bill 139. [2] The Applicant made application to the City for a Zoning By-law Amendment to permit the development of what is ultimately now proposed as a 6-storey mixed use building containing 35 condominium units, some commercial space with both in-ground and surface parking (“DeVelopment”) on an assembly of three lots located at 398, 402 and 406 Roosevelt AVe (“Site”) in the City of Ottawa. -
Alexandra Bridge Replacement Project
Alexandra Bridge Replacement Project PUBLIC CONSULTATION REPORT OCTOBER TO DECEMBE R , 2 0 2 0 Table of Contents I. Project description .................................................................................................................................... 3 A. Background ........................................................................................................................................ 3 B. Project requirements ..................................................................................................................... 3 C. Project timeline ................................................................................................................................ 4 D. Project impacts ............................................................................................................................. 4 II. Public consultation process............................................................................................................ 5 A. Overview .............................................................................................................................................. 5 a. Consultation objectives ............................................................................................................ 5 b. Dates and times ............................................................................................................................ 5 B. Consultation procedure and tools .......................................................................................... -
Ontario Sailing Annual Report 2005 Ontario
ONTARIO SAILING ANNUAL REPORT 2005 ONTARIO ONTARIO SAILING OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS - 2005 President Todd Irving Vice President - Fundraising Erin Sinyard Vice President - Marketing/Secretary Tim Bishop Vice President - Recreation Bernie Luttmer (Sr) Vice President – Training Kim Case Treasurer Ivan Lavine Past President Jim Dike Director Susan Irving Director Clive Barry Director Keith Hobbs Director David Lewis Director Al Ouellette Director Craig Pattinson Director Michael Rustom Director Christine Searle Executive Director Al Will 888-672-7245 ex. 224 Program Director Amy Goman 888-672-7245 ex. 227 Program Director Eric Cartlidge 888-672-7245 ex. 226 Communications Coordinator Rebecca Benson 888-672-7245 ex. 222 Secretary Shauna Cartlidge 888-672-7245 ex. 221 Bookkeeper/Sales Margaret Mummery 888-672-7245 ex. 223 Article 3-Objects of the Association The objects of the Association shall be generally to foster interest in sailing and to promote and encourage profi- ciency in the sport, particularly among young people in the Province of Ontario to promote sailboat racing events and to encourage the development of skills in sailboat handling and seamanship. Ontario Sailing Vision Statement To be highly regarded in the sailing and boating community as a central resource that exists to foster an interest in safe sailing and boating through a partnership with our member clubs, sailing schools, camps, and class associations 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Administration: Directors and Officers ………………………………………………. 2 President’s and Executive Director’s Reports …………………… 5-6 Treasurer’s Report ………………………………………………….. 6 Ontario Sailing Membership Report……………………………….. 7 Zone 1……………………………………………………… 7 Zone 2………………………………………………………. 7 Zone 3………………………………………………………. 8 Zone 4………………………………………………………. 9 Zone 5………………………………………………………. 9 Zone 6………………………………………………………. -
City of Ottawa Transportation Committee
City of Ottawa Transportation Committee Councillor Keith Egli Pictures Left: Main Street Renewal The $39 million Main Street Renewal Project began construction in 2015 after extensive consultations with the area’s businesses, residents, and community organizations. The project involved a renewal of the street’s infrastructure following the City’s complete street guidelines, aiming to link the street together as a unified corridor and create memorable places along it while recognizing and supporting the character of its communities. The infrastructure of Main Street has been renewed and revitalized, and now provides better options for walking, cycling, and transit use. Middle: Rideau Canal Crossing: The construction has started! 2 years of planned construction. Multi-use pedestrian and cyclist bridge over the Rideau Canal and Colonel By Drive Reduces distances between mid-town neighbourhoods Improves access to the City’s extensive network of pedestrian multi-use pathways and to Lansdowne Right: Mackenzie Cycle Track Officially opened on Friday May 19 2017. The track is bi-directional, similar to the cycle track along O’Connor Street, and runs along the east side of Mackenzie Avenue, from Rideau Street to Murray Street. Mackenzie Avenue remains a one-way, two-lane roadway, expanding to three lanes at the Rideau Street intersection. The cycle track is separated from road traffic on Mackenzie Avenue by a combination of curbs, a buffer area, and bollards in front of the U.S. Embassy.The cycle track was opened during Bike to Work Month and is part of a larger project that involved the resurfacing of Mackenzie Avenue and installation of security bollards in front of the U.S. -
Report Template
1 Report to/Rapport au : Transportation Committee Comité des transports November 27, 2012 27 novembre 2012 Submitted by/Soumis par : Nancy Schepers, Deputy City Manager/Directrice municipale adjointe, Planning and Infrastructure/Urbanisme et Infrastructure Contact Person / Personne ressource: Bob Streicher, Acting Manager/Gestionnaire par intérim, Transportation Planning/Planification des transports, Planning and Growth Management/Urbanisme et Gestion de la croissance (613) 580-2424 x 22723, [email protected] CITY WIDE / À L’ÉCHELLE DE LA VILLE Ref N°: ACS2012-PAI-PGM-0260 SUBJECT: JOINT STUDY TO ASSESS CUMULATIVE EFFECTS OF TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURES ON THE NATIONAL CAPITAL GREENBELT – STUDY REPORT OBJET : ÉTUDE CONJOINTE VISANT À ÉVALUER LES EFFETS CUMULATIFS DES INFRASTRUCTURES DE TRANSPORT SUR LA CEINTURE DE VERDURE DE LA CAPITALE NATIONALE – RAPPORT D’ÉTUDE REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS That the Transportation Committee receive this report for information. RECOMMANDATIONS DU RAPPORT Que le Comité des Transports prenne connaissance de ce rapport. BACKGROUND The purpose of this study undertaken in partnership with the National Capital Commission (NCC) was to identify projects within the Transportation Master Plan (TMP) and other transportation projects that have emerged since the completion of the TMP that could have an impact on the environmental integrity of the federal Greenbelt lands. By examining the cumulative effects of the construction of this infrastructure on the Greenbelt lands, a framework now has been established to ensure that the associated Environmental Assessments (EAs) that require federal approval will move forward more expediently. 2 One of the NCC’s mandates is to protect the Greenbelt. Current practice has been that the NCC only comments or provides input on projects that are identified in its Greenbelt Master Plan (GBMP). -
METROPOLE, Ottawa, Ontario
íê~åëáíJçêáÉåíÉÇ=ÇÉîÉäçéãÉåí Å~ëÉ=ëíìÇó METROPOLE, Ottawa, Ontario 170 LANARK AVENUE Figure 1—Metropole Tower Project data Project name Metropole at Island Park residential tower and townhouses Developer Minto Developments Inc. Date completed 2004 Site area Approximately 2.8 ha (7 acres) Number, type, size 153 apartments in the residential tower, ranging from 90–240 m2 (970–2,600 sq. ft.); of residential units 68 townhouses approximately 165 m2 (1,800 sq. ft.) Other land uses on the site Semi-public open space and pedestrian path to Transitway (rapid bus network) Gross residential density 79 uph Maximum height 32 storeys Parking Underground parking garage with one space per unit for tower residents; one- and two-car garages for townhouse residents; 24 surface spaces for tower visitors Selling price (2005) Townhouses start at $249,900; condos range from $240,000 to $1.5 million Type of transit Transitway (rapid bus network) Distance to transit station 200 m (650 ft.) Pedestrian connectivity Good Transit-Oriented Development Case Study – METROPOLE, Ottawa, Ontario PROJECT SUMMARY METROPOLE TRANSIT SYSTEM OVERVIEW AND Metropole is a residential development in Ottawa's Westboro PROJECT CONTEXT neighbourhood, about six km (3.7 mi.) west of downtown. Comprised Westboro is a residential neighbourhood of a 32-storey condominium tower and 68 townhouses, Metropole close to Ottawa’s downtown. In the takes full advantage of the site's proximity to and view of the Ottawa past 10 years or so, there has been new River. Ottawa's Transitway (rapid bus network) abuts the south side of residential development, mainly near the site, with the Westboro Station less than 200 metres from the site. -
Embracing Change: National Arts Centre 2019-2020 Annual Report
Zéro Mani Soleymanlou Role Photo © Xavier Inchauspé The National Arts Centre (NAC) is Canada’s bilingual, multi-disciplinary home for the performing arts. The NAC presents, creates, produces and co-produces performing arts programming in various streams — the NAC Orchestra, Dance, English Theatre, French Theatre, Indigenous Theatre, and Popular Music and Variety — and nurtures the next generation of audiences and artists from across Canada. The NAC is located in the National Capital Region on the unceded territory of the Algonquin Anishinaabe Nation Mandate The NAC is governed by the National Arts Centre Act, which defines its mandate as follows: to operate and maintain the Centre; to develop the performing arts in the National Capital Region; and to assist the Canada Council for the Arts in the development of the performing arts elsewhere in Canada. Accountability and Funding As a Crown Corporation, the NAC reports to Parliament through the Minister of Canadian Heritage. Of the NAC’s total revenue, less than half is derived from an annual Parliamentary appropriation, while more than half comes from earned revenue — box office sales, food and beverage services, parking services and hall rentals – and from the NAC Foundation. Each year, the Minister of Canadian Heritage tables the NAC annual report in Parliament. The Auditor General of Canada is the NAC’s external auditor. Embracing Structure A Board of Trustees consisting of 10 members from across Canada, chaired by Adrian Burns, Change oversees the NAC. The President and CEO is Christopher Deacon. The creative leadership team is composed of Heather Gibson (Popular Music and Variety), Brigitte Haentjens (French Theatre), Jillian Keiley (English Theatre), Kenton Leier (Executive Chef), Cathy Levy (Dance), Kevin Loring (Indigenous Theatre), Heather Moore (National Creation Fund) and Alexander Shelley (NAC Orchestra). -
1 Report to Rapport Au: Transportation Committee Comité Des
1 Report to Rapport au: Transportation Committee Comité des transports 6 September 2017 / 6 septembre 2017 Submitted on August 22, 2017 Soumis le 22 août 2017 Submitted by Soumis par: Vivi Chi, Manager / Gestionnaire, Transportation Planning / Planification des transports, Transportation Services Department / Direction générale des transports (613) 580-2424 extension / poste 21877, [email protected] Contact Person Personne ressource: Steven Boyle, Senior Project Manager / Gestionnaire principal de projet, Transportation Policy and Networks / Réseaux et politique de transport 613-580-2424 extension / poste 26087, [email protected] Ward: BARRHAVEN (3); KNOXDALE- File Number: ACS2017-TSD-PLN-0012 MERIVALE (9) SUBJECT: Woodroffe Avenue, Southwest Transitway and Fallowfield Road Rail Grade Separation Environmental Assessment Study – Statement of Work; and the Jockvale Road Multi-Use Pathway Rail Grade Separation Environmental Assessment Study – Statement of Work OBJET: Étude d’évaluation environnementale d’un saut-de-mouton ferroviaire à l’avenue Woodroffe, au Transitway sud-ouest et au chemin Fallowfield – Énoncé des travaux; et étude d’évaluation environnementale d’un saut-de-mouton ferroviaire au sentier polyvalent du chemin Jockvale - Énoncé des travaux. 2 REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS That the Transportation Committee approve: 1. The Statement of Work for the Woodroffe Avenue, Southwest Transitway and Fallowfield Road Rail Grade Separation Environmental Assessment Study, as outlined in this report and detailed in Document 1; and, 2. The Statement of Work for the Jockvale Road Multi-Use Pathway Rail Grade Separation Environmental Assessment Study, as outlined in this report and detailed in Document 2. RECOMMANDATIONS DU RAPPORT Que le Comite des transports approuve : 1. L’énoncé des travaux pour l’étude d’évaluation environnementale d’un saut-de-mouton ferroviaire a l’avenue Woodroffe, au Transitway sud-ouest et au chemin Fallowfield, tel que décrit dans le présent rapport et comme l’explique en détail le document 1; et, 2. -
Report Template
1 Report to/Rapport au : Transportation Committee Comité des transports and Council / et au Conseil October 24, 2012 24 octobre 2012 Submitted by/Soumis par : Nancy Schepers, Deputy City Manager/Directrice municipale adjointe, Planning and Infrastructure/Urbanisme et Infrastructure Contact Person / Personne ressource: Vivi Chi, Manager/Gestionnaire, Transportation Planning/Planification des transports, Planning and Growth Management/Urbanisme et Gestion de la croissance (613) 580-2424 x 21877, [email protected] Gloucester-South Nepean (22) Ref N°: ACS2012-PAI-PGM-0249 SUBJECT: BARRHAVEN TO RIVERSIDE SOUTH RAPID TRANSIT PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT STUDY RECOMMENDATIONS OBJET : RECOMMANDATIONS DE L’ÉTUDE DE PLANIFICATION ET D’ÉVALUATION ENVIRONNEMENTALE POUR LE TRANSPORT EN COMMUN RAPIDE ENTRE BARRHAVEN ET RIVERSIDE-SUD REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS That the Transportation Committee recommend Council approve initiating the Transit Project Assessment Process in accordance with Ontario Environmental Assessment Act (Regulation 231/08) for the Barrhaven to Riverside South Bus Rapid Transit facilities as described in this report and supporting documents, including the preparation and filing of an Environmental Project Report for formal public review and comment. RECOMMANDATIONS DU RAPPORT Que le Comité des transports recommande au Conseil d’approuver le lancement du Processus d’évaluation des projets du transport en commun conformément à la Loi sur les évaluations environnementales de l’Ontario (Réglementation 231/08) concernant les installations du transport en commun rapide par autobus entre Barrhaven et Riverside-Sud, comme le décrivent le présent rapport et les documents d’appui, et d’approuver également la préparation et le dépôt d’un 2 rapport de projet environnemental qui servira à l’examen officiel et aux commentaires du public. -
2006 Annual Report
TABLE OF CONTENTS Administration: Directors and Officers ………………………………………………. 2 President’s and Executive Director’s Reports …………………… 4-5 Treasurer’s Report ………………………………………………….. 5 Appeals Committee Report………………………………………... 6 Fundraising Committee Report……………………………………. 6-7 Marketing Committee Report …………………………………….. 8 Ontario Sailing Membership Report ……………………………… 8-14 Judges Certification Committee Report…………………………. 15 Auditor’s Report …………………………………………………….. See Website Annual General Meeting Minutes ………………………………… 16-19 Recreation: Learn to Cruise/Power Committee Report ………………………. 21 Able Sail Report ……………………………………………………… 22-23 Women Sailors’ Association Report ……………………………….. 24 BOOM Report ……………………………………………………….. 24-25 Safe Sailing in Camps Report ……………………………………… 26-27 Learn to Sail Report………………………………………………….. 28 Competition: Race Management Committee Report …………………………….. 30 Regatta Management Committee Report…………………………. 31 Athlete Development Committee Report .………………………….. 32-35 Windsurfing Committee Report………………………………………. 36 Awards Report ………………………………………………………… 37 Record of Ontario Sailing Trophy Recipients………………………. 38-39 Honour Roll—Past Presidents …………………………………………………. 40 Corporate Members ……………………………………………………………... 41 Corporate Sponsors …………………………………………………………….. 42 www.OntarioSailing.ca ONTARIO SAILING OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS - 2006 President Todd Irving Vice President / Treasurer Erin Sinyard Vice President / Secretary Tim Bishop Vice President - Recreation Bernie Luttmer (Sr.) Vice President - Training Kim (Case) Foley Past President