DOCSLIB.ORG

R(E~Xp~~Ai4n:)=R~-P

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (E xpires 5/31/2012) United States Department of the Interior RECEIVED 228 National Park Service National Register of Historic Places FEB 2 4 2014 Registration Form NAT. REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACL,· NATIONAL PARK SERVICE This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions n a 1 n egister Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional certification comments, entries, and narrative Items on continuation sheets if needed (NPS Form 10-900a). 1. Name of Property historic name Arlington National Cemetery Historic District other names/site number Arlington National Cemetery; DHR #000-0042 2. Location street & number One Memorial Avenue D not for publication city or town ......:..A.::.r.:..::lin:..:,g...:t:.::o.:....:n _ _______________________ U vicinity state Vir inia code VA county -'----"-'-'-'Arlin-'->L:. ton.:......;. ___ code 013 zip code 22211 ~-'---- 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this _x_ nomination __ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property __x_meets __ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following level(s) of significance: lL national statewide _local State or Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property _x_ meets_ does not meet the National Register criteria. Virginia Department of Historic Resources Signature of commenting official Date Title State or Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Government 4. National Park Service Certification entered in the National Register _ determined eligible for the National Register _determined not eligible for the National Register __ removed from the National Register ~~~r ~(e~x ~p ~~~ai4n ~:) =r~-P~~~~~---------------------~~7-~~~------------ United States Department of the Interior National Park Service I National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Expires 5/31/2012) Arlington National Cemetery Historic District Arlington, VA Name of Property County and State 5. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property (Check as many boxes as apply.) (Check only one box.) (Do not include previously listed resources in the count.) Contributing Noncontributing private building(s) 22 0 buildings public - Local district 1 0 Sites public - State site 10 0 structures public- Federal structure 30 0 objects object 63 0 Total Name of related multiple property listing Number of contributing resources previously (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing) listed in the National Register N/A 6 (owned by National Park Service) 6. Function or Use Historic Functions Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions.) (Enter categories from instructions.) FUNERARY/cemetery FUNERARY/cemetery LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE RECREATION AND CULTURE/monument/marker RECREATION AND CULTURE/monument/marker DOMESTIC/single dwelling DOMESTIC/single dwelling 7. Description Architectural Classification Materials (Enter categories from instructions.) (Enter categories from instructions.) LATE 19TH AND 20TH CENTURY REVIVALS/Colonial Revival foundation: STONE; BRICK 1 1 LATE 19 H AND 20 H CENTURY REVIVALS/Beaux Arts walls: STONE/marble MODERN MOVEMENT BRICK LATE 19TH AND 20TH CENTURY REVIVALS roof: ASPHALT; STONE/slate other: United States Department of the Interior National Park Service I National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMS No. 1024-0016 (Expires 5/31/2012) Arlington National Cemetery Historic District Arlington, VA Name of Property County and State Narrative Description (Describe the historic and current physical appearance of the property. Explain contributing and noncontributing resources if necessary. Begin with a summary paragraph that briefly describes the general characteristics of the property, such as its location, setting, size, and significant features.) Summary Paragraph SEE CONTINUATION SHEET Narrative Description SEE CONTINUATION SHEET United States Department of the Interior National Park Service I National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Expires 5/31/2012) Arlington National Cemetery Historic District Arlington, VA Name of Property County and State 8. Statement of Significance Applicable National Register Criteria Areas of Significance (Mark "x" in one or more boxes for the criteria qualifying the property (Enter categories from instructions.) for National Register listing.) MILITARY Property is associated with events that have made a ARCHITECTURE significant contribution to the broad patterns of our LANDSCAPE history. POLITICS/GOVERNMENT Property is associated with the lives of persons ARCHITECTURE GJ Bsignificant in our past. Property embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or represents the work of a master, or possesses high Period of Significance artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components lack 1864 - Present individual distinction. Property has yielded, or is likely to yield, information Significant Dates important in prehistory or history. 1864 (date of first burial) 1920 (Beaux Arts additions) 1966 (expansion east of Eisenhower Drive) Criteria Considerations Significant Person (Mark "x" in all the boxes that apply.) (Complete only if Criterion B is marked above.) Property is: See Section 8 a e 38 A Owned by a religious institution or used for religious purposes. Cultural Affiliation n/a B Removed from its original location. C A birthplace or grave. D A cemetery. Architect/Builder c. E A reconstructed building, object, or structure. Carrere and Hastin s F A commemorative property. Warnecke, Carl G Less than 50 years old or achieving significance Ezekiel, Moses within the past 50 years. Period of Significance (justification) SEE CONTINUATION SHEET Criteria Considerations (explanation, if necessary) SEE CONTINUATION SHEET United States Department of the Interior National Park Service I National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Expires 5/31/2012) Arlington National Cemetery Historic District Arlington, VA Name of Property County and State Statement of Significance Summary Paragraph (Provide a summary paragraph that includes level of significance and applicable criteria.) SEE CONTINUATION SHEET Narrative Statement of Significance (Provide at least one paragraph for each area of significance.) SEE CONTINUATION SHEET Developmental history/additional historic context information (if appropriate) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service I National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Expires 5/31/2 012) Arlington National Cemetery Historic District Arlington, VA Name of Property County and State 9. Major Bibliographical References Bibliography (Cite the books, articles, and other sources used in preparing this form.) SEE CONTINUATION SHEET Previous documentation on file (NPS): Primary location of additional data: preliminary determination of individual listing (36 CFR 67 has been X State Historic Preservation Office - -requested) - - Other State agency X previously listed in the National Register -"XFederal agency --previously determined eligible by the National Register - -Local government --designated a National Historic Landmark --University = recorded by Historic American Buildings Survey #__ _ _ _ --Other Virginia Department of Historic Resources, __recorded by Historic American Engineering Record # ___ _ Name of repository: ;;.R=-=icc.:.:h :.::m~o.:..:nd?'-'Vc.:.A?-;; =-:---~--:--,---;;-;;---,-­ Army National Military Cemeteries, Arlington, recorded by Historic American Landscape Survey # VA Historic Resources Survey Number (if assigned): DHR #000-0042 10. Geographical Data Acreage of Property 624 acres ~~~~~-~--- (Do not include previously listed resource acreage.) UTM References (Place additional UTM references on a continuation sheet.) 1 18 320766 4305509 3 18 321413 4305047 Zone Easting Northing Zone Easting Northing 2 18 320332 4304287 4 18 320785 4306384 Zone Easting Northing Zone Easting Northing Verbal Boundary Description (Describe the boundaries of the property.) The boundary includes the area designated as Arlington National Cemetery (ANC) and Arlington House, The Robert E. Lee Memorial (Arlington House), and follows the line of the cemetery boundary wall with two exceptions. The first exception is the inclusion of the Arlington Hemicycle, Memorial Avenue, and Arlington Memorial Bridge. These three elements are included in the nomination since they play significant roles in the access and main entrance to the cemetery as well as being part of the overall Beaux Arts planning of the cemetery in the early part of the twentieth century. The second exception is the Millennium Extension
Recommended publications
  • Women's Suffrage and Arizona's Quest for Statehood

    Women's Suffrage and Arizona's Quest for Statehood

    TT T T TERRITORIAL Prescott Arizona Corral TIMES of Westerners International TT T T A publication of the Prescott Corral of Westerners International Volume V, Number 1 TT T T The TERRITORIAL TIMES is a publication of the Prescott Corral of Westerners International, Prescott, Arizona, a non-profit organization dedicated to the study, preservation, promotion and dissemination of information with respect to the real history of the American West. Price per copy is $7.50 ($10.00 by mail). Back copies of available issues may be ordered by mail. CORRAL OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS Sheriff Cindy Gresser Byteslinger Russ Sherwin Trail Boss Mike Piacenza Symposium Coord. Fred Veil Keeper of the Chips Jack Hoeft WI Liaison Al Bates Co-Swamper Patti Moore Co-Swamper Colleen Pena Brands Recorder Mike Piacenza Historian Bruce Fee Immediate Past Sheriffs: Roland Michaelis, Don Shaffer and Mike Shepard. PUBLICATIONS COMMITTEE The Corral members responsible for this publication are: Al Bates, Jay Eby, Bruce Fee, Russ Sherwin, Fred Veil and Andy Wallace. PHOTO AND ILLUSTRATION CREDITS Photographs and illustrations in this publication were obtained from the following institutions and individuals: Sharlot Hall Museum (pages 20 and 27); Arizona Historical Society, Tucson (page1); Frank M. Murphy III (page 2); Robert Spude collection (page 12); Arizona Sate Archives and Public Records (front cover photograph); Library of Congress, George Grantham Bain Collection (page 24). John Huff Designs prepared the front cover layout. Cover Photo: On February 14, 1912, Phoenix was the site for a statehood celebratory parade along Washington Avenue from midtown to the Capitol building. The reviewing stand was located near midtown with the old Phoenix City Hall seen in the background left.
  • The Judge Advocate Journal, Bulletin No. 31, January, 1961

    The Judge Advocate Journal, Bulletin No. 31, January, 1961

    Bulletin No. 31 .January, 1961 The Judge Advocate PR R F THE JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL'S SCHOOL LIBRARY Published By JUDGE ADVOCATES ASSOCIATION An affiliated organization of the American Bar Association, composed of lawyers of all components of the Army, Navy, and Air Force Denrike Building Washington 5, D. C. JUDGE ADVOCATES ASSOCIATION Officers for 1960-61 REGINALD c. HARMON, Virginia..........................................................Pl'C$ident ERNEST M. BRANNON, District of Columbia................ Pirst Vice Pnsident FREDERICK R. BOLTON, Michigan ................................ Second Vice Preside11t PENROSE L. ALBRIGHT, Virginia.... ..... ..................................... .Secretary CLIFFORD A. SHELDON, District of Columbia ............................... .. Trerrnurer JOHN RITCHIE, III, Illinois .......................... ........................Dele[!Clte to AB,1 Directors Joseph A. Avery, Va.; Franklin H. Berry, N. J.; Robert G. Burke, N. Y.; Perry H. Burnham, Colo.; Charles L. Decker, D C.; John H. Finger, Calif.; Robert A. Fitch, Va.; Osmer C. Fitts, Vt.; James Gar­ nett, Va.; George W. Hickman, Calif.; J. Fielding Jones, Va.; Stanley 'iV. Jones, Va.; Herbert M. Kidner, Pa.; Thomas H. King, Md.; Albert M. Kuhfeld, Va.; William C. Mott, Md.; Joseph F. O'Connell, Mass.; Alexander Pirnie, N. Y.; Gordon Simpson, Texas; Clio E. Straight, Va.; Moody R. Tid\Yell, Va.; Fred Wade, Pa.; Ralph W. Yarborough, Texas. Executive Secretary and Editor RICHARD H. LOVE Washington, D. C. Bulletin No. 31 January, 1961 Publication Notice The views expressed in articles printed herein are not to be regarded as those of the Judge Advocates Association or its officers and directors or of the editor unless expressly so stated. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE The Federal Legislative Process.............................................................. 1 The 1960 Annual Meeting........................................................................ 35 Limitation of Settlements Under FTCA.............................................
  • History of Roads in Fairfax County, Virginia from 1608

    History of Roads in Fairfax County, Virginia from 1608

    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. ProQuest Information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with with permission permission of the of copyright the copyright owner. owner.Further reproductionFurther reproduction prohibited without prohibited permission. without permission. A HISTORY OF ROADS IN FAIRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA: 1608-1840 by Heather K. Crowl submitted to the Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of American University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts In Anthropology Chair: Richard J.
  • Figure 1) Topographic Map, Arlington Ridge Area

    Figure 1) Topographic Map, Arlington Ridge Area

    ....... County Une Parks -Arlington Ridge Boundary 1 inch: 900 feel l!Jppt~ll'Olt'd~tAd.,glQo!Cfll'li!)'G,l!;M1N)i'lgC.~ ~d~d..,d,QJ\llf~ •50 000 Feo1 C.f'CKI 14 •I $1•~•rlnjjlt.nv.11& l0<s.pa~•I JGkl!CnN "°~' Internet, see footnote 1 Figure 1) Topographic Map, Arlington Ridge Area 34 ARLINGTON H ISTORICAL M AGAZINE On the Street Where You Live: Arlington Ridge, Virginia BY MARTY SUYDAM What's in a name of a place? How did that name get decided? Whose life is now memorialized? The story of the names of places can represent a fascinating tale about the place where we live, yet often, know little about. We live in an area named Arlington Ridge, a topographic "finger" that points to Arlington House, the Lee mansion in Arlington Cemetery, through the area of the Pentagon. In the 1800's Anthony Fraser and James Roach owned the properties. Today, the following streets, clockwise from the north, bound the area: S. Joyce St, S. Glebe Road, and Army Navy Drive. Parts of the area have been known as: Green Valley, Club Manor Estates, Aurora Hills, Virginia Highlands, and Aurora Highlands. Most of the paved roadways in the immediate surroundings of South Nash Street are less than 100 years old. Though some roads date back to the Revolu­ tion, most have new names. 1 So, what is the name evolution on Arlington Ridge? The area was once part of the 1,000-acre estate of Anthony Fraser. The area was known as Green Valley, likely named for James Green, who lived on the land near the present location of the clubhouse at Army Navy Country Club.
  • May 2016 Newsletter

    May 2016 Newsletter

    May 12, 2016 The Civil War: April 12, 1861 - May 9, 1865 “Arlington National Cemetery — Garden of Stone” astronauts, Joe Louis, Audie Murphy and many other well known Americans. Memorials to the Shuttle Challenger Astronauts, the Confederate Monument, the Memorial Amphitheatre, the Nurses Memorial, war memorials and the great dignity of the Tomb of the Unknowns, along with others, will be discussed in this presentation. Bob Russo is the Vice President of Old Baldy Civil War Round Table and can also be found most Saturday morn- ings volunteering for the National Park Service at Indepen- dence National Historical Park. While there he conducts tours of Independence Hall, Congress Hall and offers Bob Russo interpretation at the Liberty Bell and other sites within the Park. Bob has a vast interest in American history that Join us at 7:15 PM on Thursday, May 12th, at Camden dates back to his teen years. Bob has been a member County College in the Connector Building, Room 101. of numerous historical organizations over the years that This month’s topic is "Arlington National Cemetery — include the Gettysburg Foundation, Surratt Society, Ford’s Garden of Stone" presented by Bob Russo. Theater Society, Civil War Trust, National Constitution Center and others. Bob also received the Certificate of Over many years Bob Russo made numerous trips to Ar- Completion from the Civil War Institute at Manor College in lington National Cemetery to better understand the history Pennsylvania. In his employment Bob works as the Senior and sites of this National treasure, hallowed ground and Vice President of a local structural steel and miscellaneous final resting place of over 400,000 veterans and their family iron fabricator and erector.
  • Oral History Interview, 6/11/1964 Administrative Information

    Oral History Interview, 6/11/1964 Administrative Information

    Elmer Young and James Nelson Oral History Interview, 6/11/1964 Administrative Information Creator: Elmer Young and James Nelson Interviewer: Pamela Turnure Date of Interview: June 11, 1964 Place of Interview: Washington D.C. Length: 12 pages Biographical Note Young and Nelson, White House florists during the John F. Kennedy (JFK) Administration, discuss Jacqueline Bouvier Kennedy’s involvement in White House flower arrangements, their interactions with the Kennedy children, and the flower arrangements for JFK’s funeral, among other issues. Access Open. Usage Restrictions According to the deed of gift signed April 22, 1991, copyright of these materials has been assigned to the United States Government. Users of these materials are advised to determine the copyright status of any document from which they wish to publish. Copyright The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excesses of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law. The copyright law extends its protection to unpublished works from the moment of creation in a tangible form.
  • He L'enfant Plan of 1791

    He L'enfant Plan of 1791

    >ince its inception as a formal park, the National The Residence Act of 1790 authorized the president 11all has evolved and expanded along with the to choose the location for the new city. President 1atlon that created it. The story of the .Mall Is the . George Washington chose as the city's site the land .tory of the building of a new Federal City to serve in Maryland and Virginia where the Eastern Branch !S capital of the United States. From marshes and (Anacostia River), Rock Creek, and Tiber Creek fed neadows to one of the most famous and historic into the Potomac River. The Act also designated 3ndscapes in the world, the National Mall serves as three commissioners to have immediate authority his nation's front lawn. over purchasing and accepting • ...such quantity of land for use of the United States.• Most of the land -radition has it that the plain at the foot of present· acquired by the commissioners, Including the Carroll iay Capitol Hill, drained by the Tiber Creek, was the and Burnes properties, became this nation's first 1unting and fishing grounds of Native Americans. federal public parks. President Washington hired the Vith seventeenth century British colonization, most mifitary engineer Major Pierre Charles L'Enfant to if this land eventually came into the ownership of design the Federal City. It was L'Enfant's intention he Carroll and Burnes families. • ...to turn a savage wilderness into a Garden of Eden.• he L'Enfant Plan of 1791 .'Enfant envisioned a city of parks. The Mall, or Personality clashes with tha three commissioners ·c;;rand Avenue," was to be the central landscaoe of led to L'Enfant's dismissal in 1792.
  • PENTAGON OFFICE BUILDING COMPLEX Other Name/Site Number: the Pentagon

    PENTAGON OFFICE BUILDING COMPLEX Other Name/Site Number: the Pentagon

    NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION NFS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 THE PENTAGON Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. NAME OF PROPERTY Historic Name: PENTAGON OFFICE BUILDING COMPLEX Other Name/Site Number: The Pentagon 2. LOCATION Street & Number: U.S. 1, Va. 110, and Not for publication: Interstate 395 City/Town: Arlington Vicinity:__ State: Virginia County: Arlington Code: 013 Zip Code: 20301 3. CLASSIFICATION Ownership of Property Category of Property Private:__ Building(s): X Public-local:__ District:__ Public-State:__ Site:__ Public-Federal: X Structure:__ Object:__ Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing 1 ____ buildings 1 sites (helipad) ____ structures ____ objects 1 Total Number of Contributing Resources Previously Listed in the National Register: 4 Name of related multiple property listing: NFS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 THE PENTAGON Page 2 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service______National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 4. STATE/FEDERAL AGENCY CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this ___ nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property ___ meets ___ does not meet the National Register Criteria.
  • Similarities Between L'enfant's Urban Plan for Washington, DC, and The

    Similarities Between L'enfant's Urban Plan for Washington, DC, and The

    Case Study Similarities between L’Enfant’s Urban Plan for Washington, DC, and the Royal Site of Aranjuez, Spain C. San-Antonio-G´omez1; C. Velilla2; and F. Manzano-Agugliaro3 Abstract: The influence of Versailles on L’Enfant’s 1791 plan for the city of Washington, DC, is well known. Less well known are the surprising similarities between Washington and the forma urbis of the Royal Site of Aranjuez in Spain. For example, the cities share the same diagram of two large, rectangular spaces arranged in an L shape, at the extremes of which are located, analogously, the most emblematic buildings: The Capitol and the White House in one instance, and the Royal Palace and the Church of San Antonio in the other. There are also connections between some of the diagonal avenues; between the Plaza de las Doce Calles in Aranjuez and the 12 avenues radiating from the Capitol; and between the trident of Parterre Garden in Aranjuez and the trident formed in L’Enfant’s plan by Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Maryland Avenue SW, and Avenue H. Based on these facts, this paper investigates parallels that have hitherto been ignored. It is not possible to conclude, based on the currently available information, that L’Enfant was familiar with the plan for Aranjuez, which was sent in 1775 to the main European courts, where it is conserved in their libraries. A copy of the plan is also the Library of Congress in Washington, DC. There is evidence that L’Enfant’s father, and possibly he himself, saw it in Paris at the Académie Royale de Peinture et de Sculpture, at which L’Enfant was studying before his departure for the United States.
  • 2020 DC HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN Plan Methodology Connections to Long-Range Planning B Seeking Public Views

    2020 DC HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN Plan Methodology Connections to Long-Range Planning B Seeking Public Views

    2020 District of Columbia Historic Preservation Plan Preserving For Progress 1 introduction 1 Preserving for progress The district of columbia’s vision for historic preservation 2 dc history and heritage 9 People and progress A legacy of visionary plans Landmarks and milestones A succession of eras 3 preservation achievements 45 What works about preservation in dc 4 preservation challenges 55 Gathering public views Balancing growth and character Protecting neighborhoods Communicating preservation basics Leading the nation Planning for preservation Evaluating available resources 5 goals, objectives, and actions 65 Setting shared goals Sustaining our progress Preservation in context A new planning cycle Recognizing historic resources Engaging communities Improving protections Maintaining our heritage 6 implementation 79 Achieving our goals 7 resources and appendices 89 Bibliography Credits and acknowledgements introduction 1 Preserving for progress Introduction Continuing on a Path Forward A Guide for Everyone Plan Organization Now well into its third century, the District of Columbia is This plan for 2020 updates the goals established in the Preservation requires collective action. Community The 2020 plan is organized in seven chapters: fortunate in the exceptional value of its cultural, historical, District’s historic preservation plan for the four years ending organizations and volunteers foster pride in our history and and architectural heritage. This is a rich and varied legacy, in 2016. That plan introduced a new framework for planning advocate for the benefits of preservation. Schools, cultural • First, it describes a common vision, and reviews our manifested not just in the city’s majestic museums and that could be sustained through regular updates in the institutions, and a multitude of congregations maintain history and heritage — Chapters 1 and 2.
  • AIA 1900 • 2012 the Mall in 1892 Cluttered with Buildings, Trees, and the Mall in 2006

    AIA 1900 • 2012 the Mall in 1892 Cluttered with Buildings, Trees, and the Mall in 2006

    2. Enter Architect Glenn Brown One person had studied the Mall for several years and had a clear picture of how the Mall could be restored. Architect Glenn Brown, secretary of the Washington chapter of AIA, realized that the answer was to return to the elements of the original 1791 L’Enfant Plan. Brown lobbied for the 1900 convention to be held in Washington where visitors could see, in person, the overgrown and chaotic condition of the Mall. He organized a series of presentations by architects to open discussion of a variety of ideas. Brown led the way and brought the architectural profession with him. Glenn Brown prepared a new curvilinear plan. Cass Gilbert proposed (top) moving the White House further north on 16th Street. Paper Relating to the Improvement of the City of Washington, Senate Document 94, 56th Congress, 2nd Session, 1901. Planning for the 3rd Century 6. White House Today there is a need for a new Visionary Plan for the Mall Future 17th St. in its 3rd Century – and a new McMillan Commission to levee Lincoln Washington create that Plan. This Plan will rise above the fragmented, Memorial Monument jurisdiction-based current plans and ad-hoc development A new plan can complete the unfinished Washington MonumentFlood Plain Map for western grounds portions of and the National resolve Mall. flooding Dark grey areas threats. are special flood hazard areas subject to with a comprehensive plan for the entire Mall as a unified inundation by the 1% annual chance flood (100-­‐year flood plain). Light grey are other flood areas.
  • VMFA Exhibition to Explore Transformative Power of Jewelry, Art Objects the Rachel Lambert Mellon Collection of Jean Schlumberger to Open February 10, 2017

    VMFA Exhibition to Explore Transformative Power of Jewelry, Art Objects the Rachel Lambert Mellon Collection of Jean Schlumberger to Open February 10, 2017

    COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION VIRGINIA MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS 200 N. Boulevard I Richmond, Virginia 23220-4007 www.vmfa.museum/pressroom I T 804.204.2705 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE January 19, 2017 VMFA exhibition to explore transformative power of jewelry, art objects The Rachel Lambert Mellon Collection of Jean Schlumberger to open February 10, 2017 Finding inspiration for his work in nature, the French-born designer Jean Schlumberger (1907-1987) created jewelry and accessories that transformed 20th-century fashion. The Rachel Lambert Mellon Collection of Jean Schlumberger at the Virginia Museum of Fine Arts, an exclusive new exhibition on view at VMFA from February 10 to June 18, 2017, will showcase a broad representation of jewelry and decorative objects from this innovative designer. Admission is free. Artist-jeweler Schlumberger (zhahn SCHLUM-ber-zhay) transformed 20th-century fashion with his creative designs for highly sculptural, vibrant and whimsical jewelry and accessories. He began his career crafting costume jewelry for the French surrealist fashion designer Elsa Schiaparelli in 1930s Paris, before heading his own private salon at New York’s Tiffany & Co. beginning in the 1950s. Schlumberger was known for his imaginative interpretations of animal and botanical subjects that came to define mid-20th century chic. His witty designs for objects ranging from cigarette cases and pill boxes to brooches, necklaces, and bracelets were popular with some of the most celebrated and stylish women of the period. With 142 pieces, the exhibition celebrates the generosity of Rachel “Bunny” Lambert Mellon (1910- 2014), a noted horticulturalist, philanthropist, and longtime VMFA supporter. With husband Paul Mellon, Mrs.