DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluation; Appendix H5 and H6 Index

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evaluation; Appendix H5 and H6 Index West Lake Corridor Final Environmental Impact Statement/ Record of Decision and Section 4(f) Evaluation Appendix H5 Appendix H5. Index of General Public Written Comments, Response to General Public Comments March 2018 H5-1 West Lake Corridor Final Environmental Impact Statement/ Record of Decision and Section 4(f) Evaluation Appendix H5 This page is intentionally left blank. March 2018 H5-2 West Lake Corridor Final Environmental Impact Statement/ Record of Decision and Section 4(f) Evaluation Appendix H5 Table H5-1: General Public Written Comments and Responses Index Last Name First Name Comment ID(s) Albrecht Ronald 40 Albright Brandon 41 Albright Nicole 42 Alderden Aaron 43 Alesi Amanda 44 Alexander Deb 45 Allegrezza William 46 Alrick Ron 47 Amezcua Manuel 48 Amezcua Samantha 49 Andrzejewski Edward 50 Anitec Barbara 51 Applesies Edith 52 Armstrong LJ 53 Ashrita 54 Astor Debbie 55 Astor Debbie 56 Babcock Don 57 Babusiak Kate 58 Babusiak Kevin 59 Bachmann Debbie 60 Baker Dean 61 Bakker Gene 62 Bakker Patricia 63 Barrett Gabrielle 64 Barrett Laura 65A – 65G Barrett Michael 66 Barrientez Monica 67 Baum Kathryn 68 Benchik Jon 69 March 2018 H5-3 West Lake Corridor Final Environmental Impact Statement/ Record of Decision and Section 4(f) Evaluation Appendix H5 Last Name First Name Comment ID(s) Bernardi Connie 70 Bonchnowski Ann 71 Boer Debi 72 Bolling April 73 Bowers Judy 74 Brandenburg Carly 75 Brandenburg Carly and Steve 76 Bravo Heriberto 77 Brennan Jennifer 78 Brewe Ian 79 Brohart Rodney 80 Buchnat Ursula 81 Budeselich Michelle 82 Burbach Brian 83 - 85 Burbridge Wende 86 Burgos Mercedes 87 Burian Amy 88 Byrne Mary and Rich 89 Byrne Mary 90 Cable Chris 91 Cannon Margaret 92 Carlson Rich 93 Casas M. 94 Case Donna 95 Castaneda India 96 Chang Chih-Hsuan 97 Ciupa Mike 98 Clark Kim 99 Colwell Amy 100 Colwell Brian 101 Cooper Janet 102 March 2018 H5-4 West Lake Corridor Final Environmental Impact Statement/ Record of Decision and Section 4(f) Evaluation Appendix H5 Last Name First Name Comment ID(s) Covell Paul Frank 103 Crismar Suzanne 104 Crist Caryn 105 Crist Joan 106 Crotty Julie 107 Culberg Carol 108 Czapka Stephanie 109 Czulno Laurie 110 Damico Jared 111 Davis James 112 Dean Ryan 113 Deerwester Don 114 Devine Evan 115 Docter Anne-Marie 116 Dopp Mary Jane 117 Drenne Ken 118 Dudek Aaron 119 Dudek Jayne 120 Dunn Donna 121 Eanes Pam 122 – 124 Englert Mike and Sharon 125 Ennis Heather 126 Erickson Judith 127 Falc Jr. Pio 128 Fies James 129 Flanagan Jodi 130 Flores Anna 131 Fritz Deborah 132 Gaffigan Mitch 133 Galbreath Vanessa 134 Galka Kaitlyn 135 March 2018 H5-5 West Lake Corridor Final Environmental Impact Statement/ Record of Decision and Section 4(f) Evaluation Appendix H5 Last Name First Name Comment ID(s) Garcia Isabel 136 Garcia Victoria 137 Garza Gabrina 138 Garza Katherine 139 Gescheidler Patty 140 Gessen Cynthia Vander 141 Goldman Carol 142 Goldman Robin 143 Gonzalez David 144 Graham Terry 145 Gross Peggy 146 Grubish Joe 147 Hanas Terry 148 Hand Kelly 149 Hansen Cathi 150 Haro Jaclyn 151 Haydell Dani 152 Hayes Mikayla 153 Heggi Kevin 154 Hendron Shane 155 Hernandez Kathleen 156 Heymann Tova 157 Higgason Melissa 158 Hoopq Christy 159 Huerter Brenda 160 Huerter Cy 161 Huffman Robert 162 - 172 Hunt Kevin 173 Hunter Ronald 174 Iwema Jeanne 175 Jablonski Dennis 176 March 2018 H5-6 West Lake Corridor Final Environmental Impact Statement/ Record of Decision and Section 4(f) Evaluation Appendix H5 Last Name First Name Comment ID(s) Jablonski Maureen 177 Jackson Keturah 178 Johns Paula 179 Joranorich Ned 180 Joranorich Rosalynn 181 Jovanovich Roz 182 Kalka Patricia 183 Kane Denarie 184 Kang Sang 185 Kate Mary 186 Katz Judy and Rick 187 Keefner Adam 188 Kelly Shawn 189 Kennedy John 190 Keon Thomas 191 Kolar Josh 192 Kolar Rachel 193 Kolar Rachel 194 Konrady Bernie 195 Konrady Sue 196 Kreisl Chuck 197 Kubon Thomas 198 Laim Roger 199 Lambert Jeff 200 Lambert Jodi 201 Lareau Cathy 202A – 202D Larson Dennis 203 Lattanzi Gabriella 204 Lawson Melissa 205 Laz Lazer 206 LeVan Jim 207A -207L March 2018 H5-7 West Lake Corridor Final Environmental Impact Statement/ Record of Decision and Section 4(f) Evaluation Appendix H5 Last Name First Name Comment ID(s) Lietz James 208 Lilek Tim 209 LoMally Rick 210 Loos Phill 211 Lorenz Patricia 212 Lukis Jason 213 - 214 Lukis John 215 Luksich Jon 216 Lundy Debra 217 Lundy Jeffrey A. 218 Luther Kathy 219 MacLean Justin 220 Mahalic Fran and Herb 221 Mamich Wanda 222A – 222G Manahan Jamie 223 Mangus Rob 224 Mantis Nick 225 Martin Therese 226 Mathis Cori 227 - 228 Mayberry Jenny 229 Mayberry Sue 230 McCormick Jeff 231 McCormick Joseph 232 McLees David 233 Metz Alex 234 Meyers Priscilla 235 Miceli John 236 Michalak Herbert 237 Mihalo Susan 238 Miller Craig 239 Miller Jeff 240 March 2018 H5-8 West Lake Corridor Final Environmental Impact Statement/ Record of Decision and Section 4(f) Evaluation Appendix H5 Last Name First Name Comment ID(s) Miszewski Robert 241 Mitchell Janis 242 Mitchell John 243 Moake Cora 244 Mojtahed Masoud 245 Morton Grant 246 Mrak George 247 Mudroncik Liz 248 Mulvihill Lloyd 249 Muncz Jesse 250 Murphy Shane 251 Nierengarten Kate 252 Nierengarten Michael 253 O'Banion Kim 254 Oberman Michael 255 Ochi Robert 256A – 256L O'Connor Julie 257A – 257H O'Halloran Kimberly 258 Orsi Scott 259 Panaggio Daniel 260 Pavlinac Jonathan 261 Pennanen Valerie 262 Pierson Ed 263 Pirok Brian 264 Pizzuto-Dean Jennifer 265 Pokrajac Michael 266 Popovich Craig 267 Poskin Jennifer 268 Pritchard Emily 269 Radde Ann 270 Ramirez Juan 271 March 2018 H5-9 West Lake Corridor Final Environmental Impact Statement/ Record of Decision and Section 4(f) Evaluation Appendix H5 Last Name First Name Comment ID(s) Ray Marion 272 Reyes Alicia 273 Reynolds Len 274 Ribble Eric 275 Richardson Lana and Richard 276 Robbins Cynthia 277 Rocek Charles 278 Rogan Brian 279 Rogers Walter 280A – 280B Rosales M. 281 Rose Emma 282 Ross Doug 283 Rotatori Paul 284 Ruane Sharon 285 Ruciaski Christiane 286 Rucinski Tracy 287 Rvokenen Donna 288 Ryan Tom 289 Rybicki Cori 290 Sanow Amanda 291 Sayed Aryana 292 Scalchas Rebecca 293 Schneider Christina 294 Schneider Tom 295 Sculli Michael 296 Sejda Barbara 297 Senteno Rogelio 298 Shalda Diane 299 Shareef Steven 300 Sherman Sandra 301 Sikora Paul 302 March 2018 H5-10 West Lake Corridor Final Environmental Impact Statement/ Record of Decision and Section 4(f) Evaluation Appendix H5 Last Name First Name Comment ID(s) Silaj Susan 303 – 304 Simmons William 305 Skiba Walter 306 Smit Julie 307 Smit Steven 308 Smith Ross 309 - 311 Smolar Kylie 312 Soga Rich 313 Sons Kelly 314 Stankiewicz Ted 315 Stickley Robert 316 – 317 Stricker Lou 318 Swetlik James 319 Szala Kathleen 320 – 321 Szczucki James 322 Tanis Mary 323 - 324 Tarin Jim & Cindy 325 Taylor Connie 326 Taylor Paul 327 Taylor-Brown Rondalyn 328 Tioco Jeff 329 Triezenberg Fred 330 Turner Kelly 331 Unknown Candy 332 Unknown Chad 333 Unknown Dave 334 Unknown Frances 335 Unknown Heather 336 Unknown Jacob 337 Unknown Katelyn 338 Unknown Michelle 339 March 2018 H5-11 West Lake Corridor Final Environmental Impact Statement/ Record of Decision and Section 4(f) Evaluation Appendix H5 Last Name First Name Comment ID(s) Unknown Paul 340 Unknown Rick 341 Unknown Samantha 342 Unknown Unknown 343 Unknown Unknown 344 Unknown Unknown 345 Unknown Unknown 346 Unknown Unknown 347 Unknown Unknown 348 Unknown Unknown 349 Unknown Unknown 350 Unknown Unknown 351 Unknown Unknown 352 Unknown Unknown 353 Unknown Unknown 354 Unknown Unknown 355 Unknown Unknown 356 Unknown Unknown 357 Unknown Unknown 358 Unknown Unknown 359 Unknown Unknown 360 Uzubell Joseph 361 Vachet Wendy 362 Valavanis Chris and Liz 363 Van Baren Isaac 364 VanCocker John 365 Van Hecht Jeff 366 Van Hecke Jeff 367 Van Kalker John 368 Van Til John 369 Van Waardenburg Andy 370 March 2018 H5-12 West Lake Corridor Final Environmental Impact Statement/ Record of Decision and Section 4(f) Evaluation Appendix H5 Last Name First Name Comment ID(s) Vander Woude Natalie 371 Vander Woude Sara 372 Vanderhoek Garrett 373 Venetis Maria 374 Venetis Peter 375 Verwey Wendy 376 – 377 Vigh Jacob 378 Voss Dawn 379 Wagner John 380 Warot Noran 381 Warren Candee 382 Watkins Elizabeth 383 Weller Christopher 384 Wells Karen 385 Westminster Joe 386 White David 387 White Davita 388 Will Claire 389 Williams Beverly 390 Williams Keith 391 Williams Salena 392 Willis Chantel 393 Wilson Julie 394 Wiseman Nina 395 Wotkun John 396 – 399 Wszolek Joseph 400 Yalowitz Merrill 401 Yokovich Marybeth 402 Zawada William 403 Zukley Kerrie 404 Zuzich Kristin 405 March 2018 H5-13 West Lake Corridor Final Environmental Impact Statement/ Record of Decision and Section 4(f) Evaluation Appendix H5 Last Name First Name Comment ID(s) Zwier Susan 406 March 2018 H5-14 West Lake Corridor Final Environmental Impact Statement/ Record of Decision and Section 4(f) Evaluation Appendix H5 Table H6-1: Response to DEIS General Public Written Comments Comment Comment Last Name First Name Topic Comment Response ID Type 40 Albrecht Ronald Online Roadway Connectivity to I am against the connecting of seminary drive directly to the train station. There is no outlet behind our See Master Response #31 regarding traffic and connections Comment Subdivisions development. Traffic is extremely heavy. Can't get to main road without crossing a railroad track. We have 3 to subdivisions. Form railroad crossing now. Two crossing have no railroad Gates. Looking for an accident to happen because of the heavy train traffic.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Outdoor Adventures
    1 M18 Alyea Park 2 M18 Ambler Flatwoods Nature Preserve 3 M18 American Discovery Trail 4 M18 Aukiki Wetland Conservation Area 5 M18 Bailly Homestead and Chellberg Farm 6 M18 Barker Woods 7 M18 Beverly Shores Area OUTDOOR ADVENTURES MAP 8 M18 Bicentennial Park 9 M18 Bluhm County Park 10 M18 Brincka-Cross Gardens 11 M18 Broken Wagon Bison 12 M18 Brookdale Park 13 M18 C&O Greenway 14 M18 Calumet Bike Trail 15 M18 Calumet Park 16 M18 Campbell Street Access 17 M18 Central Avenue Beach 18 M18 Central Park Plaza 19 M18 Chustak Public Fishing Area 20 M18 Coffee Creek Park A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y 21 M18 Coffee Creek Watershed Preserve 22 M18 Countryside Park and Alton Goin Museum 1 1 23 M18 Cowles Bog Trail 24 M18 Creek Ridge County Park 95 New Buffalo 25 M18 Creekside Park 2 2 26 M18 Cressmoor Prairie Nature Preserve 27 M18 239 94 Dale B. Engquist Nature Preserve 12 28 M18 Deep River County Park US BIKE ROUTE #36 3 Wilson Rd 3 29 M18 Deep River Water Trail Michiana MICHIGAN 30 M18 Deer Trail Park Michiana 77 W 10 E 1000 N ShShooresres 00 N INDIANA 31 M18 Drazer Park (Thomas S. Drazer Memorial Park) E 0 0 5 Long 94 4 N 32 M18 Dunbar Beach 4 E 900 N 77 Beach 12 US BIKE ROUTE #36 33 M18 Dune Park Station 128 44 2 Tryon Rd 39 92 d W 800 N Saugany 15 R 34 E k M18 Dune Succession Trail Lake c E i 5 W Michigan 2 w 131 0 r Blvd 4 0 Hudson a 212 3 124 N K t Lake S N Meer Rd.
    [Show full text]
  • Bikes on Trains Program
    Trails Ride your bike along Lakeshore Bike Drive in Chicago, explore the trails the South Shore Line along the Indiana Dunes National Park and experience vibrant APRIL 1, 2019 - OCTOBER 31, 2019* Your bike can ride, too! downtown South Bend. Bicycling enthusiasts can take their bikes on the South Shore Line from Chicago to South Bend! South Bend Hammond Bike racks, located in specified train cars, are Airport Erie Lackawanna Trail provided free of charge on a first-come, East Bank Trail Monon Trail first-served basis. Northside Trail Wolf Lake Trail Riverside Trail West Bank Walkway Hegewisch Look for the Symbol Big Marsh Park Dune Park Bike rack-equipped train cars are clearly marked Calumet Trail 57th Street with a bike symbol prominently located on the Dunes Kankakee Trail McCormick Place windows of each car. Cyclists are asked to enter Museum Campus and exit the bike train cars through the center East Chicago Van Buren Millennium doors. Upon boarding, bikes are to be placed in the Bloomingdale Trail Lake George Trail Lakefront Trail self-locking racks. For more information on trails visit: South Shore Indiana Dunes LaPorte County Visit South Bend Convention & Tourism Convention & Mishawaka Visitors Authority Visitors Bureau mysouthshoreline.com For safety reasons, bicycles may only board Millennium or disembark at designated stations. Van Buren Street Now you can Museum Campus McCormick Place Bicycle Platform 57th Street Bicycles Not Permitted 63rd Street ES UN K A D AR DIAN L P IN ION A NAT Bike Hegewisch Lake Hudson 11th Street (M. City)11th Dune Park Hammond Miller South Bend Airport Beverly Shores Beverly Carroll Avenue (M.
    [Show full text]
  • 206 Kappa Phi 1.Pdf
    A PETITION TO THE INTERNATIONAL FRATERNITY OF DELTA SIGMA PI BY KAPPA BETA ALPHA PROFESSIONAL BUSINESS FRATERNITY VALPARAISO UNIVERSITY VALPARAISO,, INDIANA 'Valparaiso University ^ ^ College of Business Administration Office of the Dean Valparaiso, Indiana 46383 February 22,1983 International Fraternity of Delta Sigma Pi c/o Mark Roberts 330 South Campus Avenue Oxford, OH 1^5056 Gentlemens We, the brothers of Kappa Beta Alpha, a Professional Business Fraternity at Valparaiso University, submit for your consideration this petition for acceptance. Our group was formed by students in the College of Business Administration who hoped to broaden their scope through professional programs. With this idea we hope to better our campus and the community of Valparaiso Surrounding it. We set our standards high, as does Delta Sigma Pi, and are constantly working to meet them. The honor of being accepted as a charter of Delta Sigma Pi woui^l be of mutual benefit to all concerned. We would promote the values and high standards of Delta Sigma Pi, and in turn Delta Sigma Pi could enable us to reach more people inside and outside our coramiinity. Therefore, we ask that you grant Kappa Beta Alpha a charter so that we may establish a chapter of the International Fratemity of Delta Sigma Pi on the Valparaiso University campus. Respectfully, The Brothers of Kappa BetaAlpha dAyujJd ^naicMuiu'^ /Ul^f-'O-^-r^ (^ta. Jk<^AA:6U LETTERS OF RECOMMENDATION Valparaiso University 5? College of Business Administration Valparaiso, Indiana Office of tfie Dean 46383 December 28, 1982 Mr. Mark Roberts Director of Chapter Operations Delta Sigma Pi 330 South Campus Avenue P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Advisory Committee Civil Rules
    ADVISORY COMMITTEE 7K ON CIVIL RULES WASHINGTON, D.C. MAY 3-5, 1993 L L I17 l lV H H H H I X K I ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | F, LI I7 I~~~~~~ H H El, Li 7 S-- LE Tentative Agenda Meeting of Advisory Committee on Civil Rules Federal Judiciary Building Washington, DC May 3-5, 1993 I. Welcome of new members; Orientation. II. Report on status of pending amendments. If Supreme Court returns any amendments for further consideration, we'll 7 probably take these up at this point.) III. Revisiting proposals previously considered. Ed Cooper will be sending out separately to each member his latest work on these. He has received various comments and suggestions from the groups and individuals to whom he sent drafts on an informal basis. Rule 23 tF. Rule 26(c) (sunshine/confidentiality) Rule 43 7 Rule 68 (also possible FJC study) L Rule 83 Rule 84 t IV. Style Revision. Enjoy yourself. V. New Matters. We have received a variety of suggestions for changes. We'll need to discuss them briefly to decide which we might want to go forward with. I'm asking Ed and John Rabiej to go through their correspondence to make a list. Among the items I'm aware of: Rules 7 and 11 (signature requirement for electronic filing); Rule 45 (expansion of trial subpoena jurisdiction); Rules 52 and 59 (requirement for 10- day filing--not merely serving); Rule 53 (expansion of role of Master to discovery/pretrial areas); Rule 64 (ABA proposal--legislative action). VI. Plans for future meetings, submissions to Standing Committee, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Sharing the Trail Prevention
     60th Á ¨¦§94 Maudlin Rd Jackson §90 Á Park ¨¦ Woodlawn Dorchester EDITION Lakefront Trail 2012 King Halsted Kostner Marquette Marquette Greenway Forest Lawn Rd Marquette to New Buffalo Marquette California Lakeside Rd Grand Trunk Trail Trunk Grand South Wilson Rd Rd Nye Damen State .org nirpc Shore Oaks RdThree www. 71st Á Á Á Witt Rd Basswood Rd Martin Rd E 850 N 850 E US 12 Berrien County MICHIGAN Michiana Dr King Loomis Á 76th Á 76th Rainbow LaPorte County IN Hesston Steam Museum INDIANA Portage, Vincennes Beach E 1000 N N 500 E E 900 N N 150 E 150 N LAKE MICHIGAN Michiana W 1000 N N 215 E  Á COMMISSION PLANNING Illinois Central Line Á Á Shores Dr Portal E NDIANA REGIONAL REGIONAL NDIANA I N R ESTE HW T R O Long Frontage Rd N 83rd 83rd  by Prepared 83rd Á South Chicago Á U39 South Shore South V Â83rd Beach Yellow Birch Á Major Taylor Trail N 500 W W 925 W Rock Island Trail Wetland W 900 N W 900 N N 200 E Thompson Bog 87th  94 Á Á ¨¦§ N 600 E Kedzie Á Nature Preserve California N 375 W Dan Ryan 41 Lake Shore Dr 90 AILS TR R Ambler Flatwoods ¨¦§ WATE & BIKING HIKING, REGIONAL Woods Á Jeffery ¨¦§80 N 125 E 125 N Lain §90 Michigan Nature Preserve SR 39 91st Á ¨¦ 92nd Á Kenwood 93rd  ! ! 93rd Á ! Washington! 212 Lakefront South Trail Extension ! U ! V ! ! ! ! Meer Rd ! Park E 800 N 20 ! ! ! Tryon Rd W 800 N ! ! N 400 W Saugana Trl 2 ! ! £12 N 300 W ! !Singing¤ Sands - Lighthouse Trail ! !  Lake Calumet Bikeways ! Pottawattamie Á  !  Á ! ! !  Evergreen Park Á ! ! Emery Rd ! City ! Á Chicago Á Park Karwick Rd Karwick
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7; Section 4(F)
    West Lake Corridor Final Environmental Impact Statement/ Record of Decision and Section 4(f) Evaluation Chapter 7 Section 4(f) Evaluation Chapter 7 Section 4(f) Evaluation March 2018 West Lake Corridor Final Environmental Impact Statement/ Record of Decision and Section 4(f) Evaluation Chapter 7 Section 4(f) Evaluation This page intentionally left blank. March 2018 West Lake Corridor Final Environmental Impact Statement/ Record of Decision and Section 4(f) Evaluation Chapter 7 Section 4(f) Evaluation 7 Section 4(f) Evaluation Chapter 7 identifies and evaluates the potential effects from the FEIS Preferred Alternative and the alternatives considered in the DEIS, including the DEIS NEPA Preferred Alternative. This chapter describes the effect of the Project on properties protected by Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966, commonly known as Section 4(f). Section 4(f) established requirements for USDOT, including FTA, to consider publicly owned parks/recreational areas that are accessible to the general public, publicly owned wildlife/waterfowl refuges, and publicly or privately owned historic sites of federal, state, or local significance in developing transportation projects (49 USC § 303). Section 4(f) prohibits use of these resources for transportation projects unless (1) it is proven that there is no feasible and prudent alternative to the use and the action includes all possible planning to minimize harm or (2) the agency determines that the use of the property, including any measure(s) to minimize harm, would have a de minimis impact on the property [23 CFR Part 774.3(a)]. This law is codified in 49 USC § 303 and 23 USC § 138 and is implemented by FTA through the regulations at 23 CFR Part 774.
    [Show full text]
  • Of 65 NIRPC ADA PUBLIC HEARING 6/11/13 CART & Transcription
    Page 1 of 65 1 NIRPC ADA PUBLIC HEARING 2 PURDUE CALUMET LIBRARY 3 HAMMOND, IN 4 JUNE 11, 2013 5 1-4 p.m. 6 7 8 CART SERVICES AND VERBATIM TRANSCRIPTION SERVICES 9 PROVIDED BY: 10 VOICE TO PRINT CAPTIONING, LLC 11 9800 Connecticut Drive 12 Crown Point, IN 46307 13 219-644-3220 14 www.voicetoprint.com 15 [email protected] 16 NIRPC ADA PUBLIC HEARING 6/11/13 CART & Transcription by Voice to Print Captioning Page 2 of 65 17 >> GAIL BARKER: Hello. My name is Gail Barker, the 18 Disability Coordinator at Purdue North Central. I will be 19 serving as the facilitator of this year's public hearing for the 20 Northwestern Indiana Regional Planning Commission. I would like 21 to welcome those who are here at Purdue University Calumet for 22 our 2013 public hearing. I would also like to welcome those 23 that are watching on the Internet and those that are watching 24 from the site at LaPorte, Indiana also on the Internet. 25 NIRPC, as the agency is called, is a Metropolitan Planning 26 Organization that is responsible for regional transportation 27 planning in Lake, Porter and LaPorte Counties. 28 This hearing is being held as a result of a Class Action 29 ADA transportation lawsuit which was filed in 1997. ADA stands 30 for the Americans with Disabilities Act, which was enacted into 31 law in 1990. The lawsuit settlement, which was reached in 2006, 32 requires NIRPC to have an independent ADA review each year of 33 all its subgrantees; that is, all the public transit providers 34 for whom NIRPC provides monitoring and oversight.
    [Show full text]
  • April 2016 All Aboard Indiana
    ALL INDIANA ABOARD The Official Newsletter of the Volume 3, Number 4 April 2016 IN THIS ISSUE: Page Two-Three IPRA Calls for Grassroots Effort IPRA Calls for Grassroots Effort, continued To Enhance Hoosier State Service By Phillip Streby Page Four Strengthening Hoosier State Editor’s Note: The following article was originally writ- Service Meeting Topic ten for the spring issue of the Rail Users’ Network (RUN) INDOT, Iowa Pacific Taking quarterly newsletter. It is being republished with their Steps to Boost Ridership permission. Two leading Midwest passenger rail advo- Hoosier State Amenities cates—Ken Prendergast, executive director, All Aboard Featured on Two Videos Ohio, and Steve Coxhead, president, Indiana Passenger Rail Alliance—assisted Mr. Streby in providing material Page Five or editing assistance. February On-Time Performance for Hoosier Members of passenger rail advocacy groups seem to Two girls enjoy a ride on the Hoosier State at 93.9 Percent have to approach their local issues at the basic grass State. What Business Class Is Like roots level on each occasion, reinventing the path to on Amtrak’s Cardinal either improving existing service levels or instituting new services. The Indiana Passen- ger Rail Alliance (IPRA) was formed to bring advocates affiliated with several groups to- Page Six gether in order to create a more effective voice with which to engage with both the Indi- Wait Nearly Over for Lafayette ana General Assembly and Indiana Department of Transportation (INDOT). Page Seven Let us be very clear about why this is necessary. IPRA does not advocate for im- Framework To Improve “On proved passenger rail service either out of a sense of nostalgia for the old days or for Time” Performance Deserves a an antipathy to the automobile.
    [Show full text]
  • East Chicago Junior Police: an Effective Project in the Non-Academic Area of the School's Total Educational Attack on the Disadvantagement of Youth
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 053 241 UD 011 713 TITLE East Chicago Junior Police: An Effective Project in the Non-Academic Area of the School's Total Educational Attack on the Disadvantagement of Youth. INSTITUTION East Chicago City School District, Ind: PUB DATE Dec 70 NOTE 65p. EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF-$0.65 HC-$3.29 DESCRIPTORS After School Programs, Behavior Problems, Child Development, *Delinquency Prevention, *Disadvantaged Youth, Health Activities, Music Activities, *Police School Relationship, Program Descriptions, Program Design, Program Effectiveness, Program Evaluation, School Community Programs, Volunteers, Youth Clubs, Youth Problems, *Youth Programs IDENTIFIERS *East Chicago Junior Police, Elementary Secondary Education Title I, Indiana ABSTRACT The Junior Police program utilized non-academic youth interests as its foundation. The project filled the need for a youth organization, a youth clearinghouse, and more aid to delinquent and predelinquent youth to redirect them into ways of thinking and acting beneficial both to themselves and to the community. The objectives of the program were to provide supplemental effort in attacking conditions which interfere with a child's educational growth--those conditions, being underachievement, social, cultural, and nutritional disadvantagement, and health deficiencies. Program areas included were music, arts and crafts, sports, health, cosmetology, business, hobbies, field trips, and parties. Both professionals and volunteers comprised the staff including members of the East Chicago police and fire departments. Those working with the program submit that the Junior Police members have been involved in fewer incidents of delinquency than non-members. (Author/CB) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION & WELFARE OFFICE OF EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT fiAS BEEN REPRO- OUCED EXACTLY /.S RECEIVED FROM THE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIG- INATING IT.
    [Show full text]
  • DOCUMENT RESUME ED 112 164 CE 004 982 TITLE Indiana
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 112 164 CE 004 982 TITLE Indiana Career Resource Center: Annual Report: 1974-75. INSTITUTION Indiana Univ., South Bend. Indiana Career Resource Center. PUB DATE [75] NOTE 207p.; Portions of Appendix N may not be completely legible in microfiche; Not available in hard copy due to paper color of original document EDRS PRICE LIF-$0.76 Plus Postage. HC Not Available from EDRS. DESCRIPTORS *Annual Reports; *Career Education; Educational Development; *Educational Programs; Educational Resources; Letters (Correspondence); Questionnaires; *Resource Centers; Resource Materials; Teaching Techniques IDENTIFIERS Career Information Centers; *Indiana ABSTRACT The report presents an account of the activities and progress of the Indiana Career Resource Center in its sixth year as a source of ideas and programs for educators developing their own career education programs. It documents the services offered: (1) inservice and preservice training of classroom teachers, student teachers, counselors, administrators, and school board and community members in the concepts and involvement of a career education program;(2) editing and producing media to assist educators, including a career education specialty training directory; (3) developing contacts in the local community and becoming involved with local projects as a means of piloting ideas that could be duplicated in other settings (women's career center, career guidance institute, life planning, conference telephone use in career education) and career development workshops for the Comprehensive
    [Show full text]
  • RUN Newsletter Spring 2016V3.Indd
    NEWSLETTER Spring 2016 Vol. 13, Issue 2 Will Privatization Save The Northeast Corridor? Individual By Richard J. Arena Transportation Bill, known as the NEC infrastructure is Highlights the FAST (“Fixing America’s a millstone. If full annual The Northeast Corridor is an Surface Transportation”) Act, maintenance and state-of-good- expensive piece of real estate, the major changes were to repair costs (estimated to be in snaking along the coast from reauthorize Amtrak and to excess of $2 billion/year) were Boston to Washington, DC. split Amtrak into two separate included in Amtrak’s NEC profit Rail Commuting in While less than 2% of America’s financial accounts—the and loss statement (which they Ventura County p. 2 land mass, it is home to over 50 Northeast Corridor (NEC) and cannot because they are capital), million residents and responsible the National Network (NN). the net result would be an NEC Brooklyn-Queens for 20% of the nation’s GDP. The purpose for this split was loss in the billions. Light Rail? p. 3 Every day over 2,000 trains from to keep the “profits” from NEC Amtrak, commuter rail agencies, operations there, and not use Second concern: FAST does not and freight lines share the tracks, them to subsidize losses on NN differentiate between operating VIA Rail and Canadians’ making it the world’s busiest trains. Simple? Not quite. expenses and infrastructure Mobility Needs p. 4 rail corridor. Plans have been costs. Clearly, a much preferred proposed to upgrade the NEC First concern: Amtrak’s NEC outcome would have been Enhancing Hoosier to true high speed rail, but there does not actually realize a separating Amtrak into three State Service p.
    [Show full text]
  • Area Code 205 Area Code 219 Area Code 231 Area
    CERTIFIED LEAD INSPECTOR'S Cert # First Name Last Name Company Location Phone # Area Code 205 P-01571 Leigh Lachine Accelerated Risk Management LLC BIRMINGHAM (205)533-7662 Area Code 219 P-04277 WILLIAM CENTER Greentree Environmental PORTAGE, IN 219-764-2828 Area Code 231 P-01412 JAMES ARMSTRONG ARM Industrial & Environmental Consultants, Inc. BIG RAPIDS 231-592-9858 P-06974 HAROLD BROWER Norlund & Associates, Inc. LUDINGTON 231-843-3485 P-06268 KYLE CLARK PM Environmental GRAND RAPIDS 231-571-3082 P-00013 ROBERT PETERS Otwell Mawby P.C. TRAVERSE CITY 231-946-5200 P-01268 JOHN REHKOPF Northern Analytical Services LEROY 231-679-0005 P-05558 JUSTON REHKOPF Northern Analytical Services, LLC BIG RAPIDS 231-679-0005 Area Code 248 P-06647 ALI SALIH AL-HADDAD Fisbeck, Thompson, Carr & Huber, Inc. GRAND RAPIDS 248-410-7411 P-02334 ROOSEVELT AUSTIN, III Arch Environmental Group FARMINGTON 248-426-0165 P-06124 KATHLEEN BALAZE McDowell & Associates FERNDALE 248-399-2066 P-03480 JULIE BARTON AKT Peerless FARMINGTON 248-615-1333 P-04724 JASON BARYLSKI IAQ Management Services, Inc. FARMINGTON 248-932-8800 P-01082 RICHARD BREMER City of Royal Oak ROYAL OAK 248-246-3133 P-04983 JOSEPH BURLEY Freelance Envir-Tech Services, LLC OAK PARK 248-721-8574 P-05333 THOMAS CARPENTER Performance Environmental Serv. WIXOM 248-926-3800 P-06860 LEE EDWIN COX City of Farmington Hills FARMINGTON HILLS 248-473-9546 P-00657 JOE DEL MORONE II Oakland County Home and Improvement PONTIAC 248-858-5307 P-04823 JANE DIPPLE All American Home Inspections OXFORD 248-760-5441 P-00869 PETER ESSENMACHER Oakland County Community Development PONTIAC 248-858-0493 P-07010 DONNA EVANS Waterford Schools Transportation WATERFORD 248-674-2692 P-06262 GREGORY FAHRENBRUCH Restoration Environmental Safety Technologies AUBURN HILLS 248-778-5940 P-04763 JENNIFER FASHBAUGH Fishbeck, Thmpson, Carr & Huber, Inc.
    [Show full text]