RUN Newsletter Spring 2016V3.Indd
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
On the Brink: 2021 Outlook for the Intercity Bus Industry in the United States
On the Brink: 2021 Outlook for the Intercity Bus Industry in the United States BY JOSEPH SCHWIETERMAN, BRIAN ANTOLIN & CRYSTAL BELL JANUARY 30, 2021 CHADDICK INSTITUTE FOR METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AT DEPAUL UNIVERSITY | POLICY SERIES THE STUDY TEAM AUTHORS BRIAN ANTOLIN, JOSEPH P. SCHWIETERMAN AND CRYSTAL BELL CARTOGRAPHY ALL TOGETHER STUDIO AND GRAPHICS ASSISTING MICHAEL R. WEINMAN AND PATRICIA CHEMKA SPERANZA OF PTSI TRANSPORTATION CONTRIBUTORS DATA KIMBERLY FAIR AND MITCH HIRST TEAM COVER BOTTOM CENTER: ANNA SHVETS; BOTTOM LEFT: SEE CAPTION ON PAGE 1; PHOTOGRAPHY TOP AND BOTTOM RIGHT: CHADDICK INSTITUTE The Chaddick Insttute does not receive funding from intercity bus lines or suppliers of bus operators. This report was paid for using general operatng funds. For further informaton, author bios, disclaimers, and cover image captons, see page 20. JOIN THE STUDY TEAM FOR A WEBINAR ON THIS STUDY: Friday, February 19, 2021 from noon to 1 pm CT (10 am PT) | Free Email [email protected] to register or for more info CHADDICK INSTITUTE FOR METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AT DEPAUL UNIVERSITY CONTACT: JOSEPH SCHWIETERMAN, PH.D. | PHONE: 312.362.5732 | EMAIL: [email protected] INTRODUCTION The prognosis for the intercity bus industry remains uncertain due to the weakened financial condition of most scheduled operators and the unanswerable questions about the pace of a post-pandemic recovery. This year’s Outlook for the Intercity Bus Industry report draws attention to some of the industry’s changing fundamentals while also looking at notable developments anticipated this year and beyond. Our analysis evaluates the industry in six areas: i) The status of bus travel booking through January 2021; ii) Notable marketing and service developments of 2020; iii) The decline of the national bus network sold on greyhound.com that is relied upon by travelers on thousands of routes across the U.S. -
South Station Expansion Project
On page 2 of the WWTR, the Proponent reports in the Boston Water & Sewer Commission's (BWSC) assessment that there is adequate capacity in its sewer mains to collect and convey the Project's new wastewater flows, which could increase wastewater fl ow contribution from the site by as much as 453,150 gallons per day (gpd) at the South Station site, an increase of 122% from existing conditions, according to the WWTR. This may be true for 5.1 dry weather flow conditions, but downstream BWSC and MWRA sewer systems serving South Station and the other project areas can surcharge and overflow during large storms, due to large volumes of stormwater entering combined sewer systems. Any increase in sanitary flow, if not offset with infiltration/inflow ("III") or stormwater removal from hydraulically related sewer systems can be expected to worsen system surcharging and overflows. The WWTR separately describes local and state regulations requiring I/I removal at a ratio of 4 gallons III removed for every new gallon of sanitary flow to ensure the mitigation of these potential impacts. The Proponent commits to 4: 1 I/I removal to offset new wastewater flows generated at the South Station site. I/I removal from hydraulically related systems may occur remote from the project site. It is imperative that the Proponent evaluate how the local sewers to which the project's flows will be connected will perform with the large added flows from the project and the III reduction that may occur far afield. Connections to the BWSC sewer 5.2 pipes should be carefully selected to ensure that any local sewer surcharging is not worsened by the new flows in a way that causes greater CSO discharges at nearby CSO regulators and outfalls,.notwithstanding the removal of extraneous flows elsewhere. -
Draft – Massdot Capital Investment Plan 1
DRAFT – MASSDOT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN 1 To our customers I am pleased to present the Massachusetts Department of Transportation’s (MassDOT) draft five-year Capital Investment Plan (CIP). Over the coming weeks, we look forward to your feedback on the proposed projects that are funded. This document, in many respects, is the outcome of both Governor Patrick and the Legislature’s seven year effort to deliver on transportation reform and investment. In 2007, an immediate transportation needs bond bill was passed and signed into law, and the Governor created the first ever Mobility Compact to enable the historically siloed transportation agencies to work together to improve our system. One year later, the Patrick Administration worked with the Legislature to enact the $3.0 billion Accelerated 1 Secretary of Transportation Richard Davey offering remarks at the 2013 Bridge Program to address hundreds of crumbling bridges in Transportation Day on the Hill event at the State House. Massachusetts. In 2009, Governor Patrick and the Legislature delivered landmark transportation reform legislation that eliminated bureaucracies, improved safety and the customer experience, saved the taxpayer hundreds of millions of dollars and created MassDOT. In 2011 and 2012, the Patrick Administration launched a series of statewide conversations to hear the public’s vision for the future of transportation in the Commonwealth and ideas for how to equitably pay for it. This past July, new transportation reforms and additional resources became available to invest in transportation. And now, we are publishing the first consolidated transportation capital plan in the Commonwealth’s recent history. This CIP is designed to be a transparent, comprehensive plan that describes how MassDOT is funded and provides a roadmap for balancing in our statewide transportation needs with fiscally constrained transportation resources. -
Replacing Amtrak: Privatization, Regionalization, and Liquidation
P o l i c y S t u d y N o . 2 3 5 , O c t o b e r 1 9 9 7 RReeppllaacciinngg AAmmttrraakk:: A Blueprint for Sustainable Passenger Rail Service by Joseph Vranich EXECUTIVE SUMMARY mtrak is a failed national experiment. By its own admission, Amtrak is headed for bankruptcy unless Washington provides another multi-billion-dollar bail-out. Another federal rescue is A unjustified considering that federal and state subsidies to Amtrak since its inception in 1971 are nearing $22.5 billion, an amount out of proportion to Amtrak’s usefulness in most of the nation. The federal government does not run a national airline. It doesn’t operate a national bus company. There’s no justification for a national railroad passenger operation. America needs passenger trains in selected areas, but doesn’t need Amtrak’s antiquated route system, poor service, unreasonable operating deficits, and capital investment program with low rates of return. Amtrak’s failures result in part because it is a public monopoly—the very type of organization least able to innovate. This study reveals an Amtrak credibility crisis in the way it reports ridership figures, glosses over dwindling market share, understates subsidies, issues misleading cost-recovery claims, offers doubtful promises regarding high-speed rail, lacks proper authority for the freight business it recently launched, and misrepresents privatization as its applies to Amtrak. It’s time to liquidate Amtrak, privatize and regionalize parts of it, permit alternative operators to transform some long-distance trains into land-cruise trains, and stop service on hopeless routes. -
September 28, 2007
Vol. 65, No. 39 Publishedished inin thethe interinterest of Division West, First Army and Fort Carson community Sept. 28, 2007 Visit the Fort Carson Web site at www.carson.army.mill Building the team 2nd BCT trains at AF Academy Story and photos by Cpl. Rodney Foliente 2nd Brigade Combat Team Public Affairs Office, 4th Infantry Division Soldiers from 2nd Brigade Combat Team, 4th Infantry Division, conducted team-building training in Jacks Valley at the Air Force Academy in Colorado Springs Sept. 7. Leaders from Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 2nd BCT, coor- dinated the event and opened the training up to their Soldiers and Soldiers from Company A, 204th Brigade Support Battalion, cooks from the Warhorse Dining Facility and medics from 1st Squadron, 10th Cavalry Regiment. “Overall, the Jacks Valley event was geared to provide a different training setting as well as to promote team spirit and team accomplishment,” said Sgt. 1st Class Erin Langes, training Soldiers from Company A, 204th Brigade Support Battalion, 2nd Brigade Combat Team, 4th Infantry Division, noncommissioned officer-in-charge, dig their way beneath an electrical fence at the Air Force Academy’s Leadership Reaction Course Sept. 7. HHC, 2nd BCT. He said Soldiers had a lot of fun and learned quite a bit. the day and saw the event as a “hugely their destinations. Soldiers had to accomplish their missions with limited “It was a chance for (Soldiers) to beneficial team-building exercise.” locate each point and then use that supplies, limited time and a whole get out, see a different part of Colorado Soldiers separated into squads, spot as reference to finding the next lot of teamwork. -
Fairmount Indigo Planning Initiative Corridor Plan Appendices
FAIRMOUNT INDIGO PLANNING INITIATIVE CORRIDOR PLAN APPENDICES CORRIDOR PLAN FAIRMOUNT INDIGO PLANNING INITIATIVE SEPTEMBER 2014 WWW.FAIRMOUNTINDIGOPLANNING.ORG FAIRMOUNT INDIGO PLANNING INITIATIVE CORRIDOR PLAN APPENDICES Appendices Contents 1 Process and Meetings 2 Existing Conditions Analysis 3 Growth Strategy Methodology PROCESS AND MEETINGS PROCESS AND MEETINGS The Fairmount Indigo Planning Initiative was over a 2 5. CAG Discussion year long process that involved extensive community 6. Suggested Case Studies of Corridors outreach, participation and conversation. The Planning 7. Community Forum Preparations Initiative involved separate, but parallel processes for 8. Next Steps Corridor-wide planning and Station Area planning. The City of Boston appointed members of a Corridor Corridor Advisory Group Meeting #4 Advisory Group (CAG) to be a consistent voice of the October 10, 2012 Corridor community and neighborhoods throughout 1. Welcome and Introductions the process. 2. Summary of Previous Meeting 3. Department of Neighborhood Development The CAG Members dedicated over a year of meetings 4. Community Forum and discussion to the Corridor and the City is grateful 5. Corridor Case Studies for their contributions. All Corridor Advisory Group 6. Next Steps meetings were open to the public, held in locations throughout the Corridor and attended by members of Corridor Advisory Group Meeting #5 the community. The following is a list of meetings and November 13, 2012 agendas that were a part of this community planning 1. Overview of Community Forum process: 2. CAG Member Roles at Forum 3. Virtual Corridor Tour and CAG Speakers Corridor Advisory Group Meeting #1 4. Discussion of Break-out Group Questions June 14, 2012 5. -
Senate Hearings Before the Committee on Appropriations
S. HRG. 107–395 Senate Hearings Before the Committee on Appropriations Department of Transportation and Related Agencies Appropriations Fiscal Year 2002 107th CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION H.R. 2299/S. 1178 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (Amtrak) NONDEPARTMENTAL WITNESSES Department of Transportation and Related Agencies Appropriations, 2002 (H.R. 2299/S. 1178) S. HRG. 107–395 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND RELAT- ED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002 HEARINGS BEFORE A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED SEVENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION ON H.R. 2299/S. 1178 AN ACT MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANS- PORTATION AND RELATED AGENCIES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2002, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES Department of Transportation General Accounting Office National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) Nondepartmental witnesses Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/senate U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 70–867 PDF WASHINGTON : 2002 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS 1 TED STEVENS, Alaska, Chairman THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico ERNEST F. HOLLINGS, South Carolina CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky TOM HARKIN, Iowa CONRAD BURNS, Montana BARBARA A. MIKULSKI, Maryland RICHARD C. -
Perimeter Secure
Vol. 75, No. 19 May 12, 2017 Perimeter secure Photo by Spc. Anthony Bryant From left, Pfc. Michael E. Sherman, Sgt. Michael C. Brew and Staff Sgt. Christopher Maneuver Site (PCMS) April 25. Soldiers with 1st SBCT were at PCMS from April 18 L. Rogers, infantrymen, Company B, 1st Battalion, 38th Infantry Regiment, 1st to May for peration Raider Focus the brigade’s certification and alidation Stryker Brigade Combat Team, 4th Infantry Division, establish a guard position and exercise in preparation for the brigade’s upcoming rotation to the National Training pull security to enable squads to push forward to clear an objective at Piñon Canyon Center. See story on pages 16-17. Army chief: Future warfare requires ‘disciplined disobedience’ By C. Todd Lopez Milley said he expects Soldiers to know when it’s time in garrison, during peacetime, but it’s “the opposite of Army News Service to disobey an order. what we are going to need in any type of warfare — but “I think we’re over-centralized, overly bureaucratic in particular, the warfare I envision,” he said. WASHINGTON — Following every order to and overly risk-averse,” Milley said May 4 at the Army During the Association of the U.S. Army symposium the letter is largely understood to be a way of life in the and Navy Club in Washington, D.C., as part of the in October, Milley laid out exactly what his vision of Army, but that may not always be the best course of Atlantic Council Commanders Series. action. In fact, Chief of Staff of the Army Gen. -
JUNE 1975 TOM PULSIFER Editor OFFICIAL NEWSLETTER of OARP
• THE • A$OCtliON OF A41l..R040 96ENGERS Post Office Box 653 • Xenia, Ohio 45385 issue #6 JUNE 1975 TOM PULSIFER editor OFFICIAL NEWSLETTER OF OARP OHIO SITUATION UPDATE by David s. Marshall Ohio continues to move toward active involvement in OFFICIAL rail passenger service. The legislation initiated mainly by Rep. Art Wilkowski to establish an Ohio rail ANNOUNCEMENT authority outside the Ohio DOT (HB 64) has passed the of the House and moved on to the Senate Transportation Com mittee for review. OARP testified before Wilkowski's MID-SUMMER Committee and before the Senate Committee. At press G ETING time the bill is being reported out of committee and is given a good chance of passing the Senate. of the The other matter, critical to the State involvement, OHIO ASSOCIATION of is the constitutional amendment legislation to allow RAILROAD PASSENGERS Ohio to use state funds in support of rail activities. This bill is House Joint Resolution 47. As firstwrit in CINCINNATI, OHIO ten it failed a House vote due a lack of Republican ••• see the insert backing. This prompted an urgent plea from OARP for at center of issue communications to Republican legislators. A motion to rehear the question passed with bi-partisan support and joint committee activity between the houses has been ironing out wrinkles in the proposal. As we go to press HJR 47 is on the calendar for a House vote and is given excellent chances of making it this time. LATE-BREAKING ITEMI We are told that the constitutional amendment it car The Freedom Train ries is designed to allow Ohio to participate finan schedule in Ohio cially in support of corporations set up by Congress. -
A Review of Amtrak Operations, Part Iii: Examining 41 Years of Taxpayer Subsidies
A REVIEW OF AMTRAK OPERATIONS, PART III: EXAMINING 41 YEARS OF TAXPAYER SUBSIDIES (112–107) HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION SEPTEMBER 20, 2012 Printed for the use of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure ( Available online at: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/ committee.action?chamber=house&committee=transportation U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 76–148 PDF WASHINGTON : 2013 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Aug 31 2005 13:41 Feb 07, 2013 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 P:\HEARINGS\112\FULL\9-20-1~1\76148.TXT JEAN COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE JOHN L. MICA, Florida, Chairman DON YOUNG, Alaska NICK J. RAHALL II, West Virginia THOMAS E. PETRI, Wisconsin PETER A. DEFAZIO, Oregon HOWARD COBLE, North Carolina JERRY F. COSTELLO, Illinois JOHN J. DUNCAN, JR., Tennessee ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON, District of FRANK A. LOBIONDO, New Jersey Columbia GARY G. MILLER, California JERROLD NADLER, New York TIMOTHY V. JOHNSON, Illinois CORRINE BROWN, Florida SAM GRAVES, Missouri BOB FILNER, California BILL SHUSTER, Pennsylvania EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON, Texas SHELLEY MOORE CAPITO, West Virginia ELIJAH E. CUMMINGS, Maryland JEAN SCHMIDT, Ohio LEONARD L. BOSWELL, Iowa CANDICE S. MILLER, Michigan TIM HOLDEN, Pennsylvania DUNCAN HUNTER, California RICK LARSEN, Washington ANDY HARRIS, Maryland MICHAEL E. CAPUANO, Massachusetts ERIC A. ‘‘RICK’’ CRAWFORD, Arkansas TIMOTHY H. -
April 2016 All Aboard Indiana
ALL INDIANA ABOARD The Official Newsletter of the Volume 3, Number 4 April 2016 IN THIS ISSUE: Page Two-Three IPRA Calls for Grassroots Effort IPRA Calls for Grassroots Effort, continued To Enhance Hoosier State Service By Phillip Streby Page Four Strengthening Hoosier State Editor’s Note: The following article was originally writ- Service Meeting Topic ten for the spring issue of the Rail Users’ Network (RUN) INDOT, Iowa Pacific Taking quarterly newsletter. It is being republished with their Steps to Boost Ridership permission. Two leading Midwest passenger rail advo- Hoosier State Amenities cates—Ken Prendergast, executive director, All Aboard Featured on Two Videos Ohio, and Steve Coxhead, president, Indiana Passenger Rail Alliance—assisted Mr. Streby in providing material Page Five or editing assistance. February On-Time Performance for Hoosier Members of passenger rail advocacy groups seem to Two girls enjoy a ride on the Hoosier State at 93.9 Percent have to approach their local issues at the basic grass State. What Business Class Is Like roots level on each occasion, reinventing the path to on Amtrak’s Cardinal either improving existing service levels or instituting new services. The Indiana Passen- ger Rail Alliance (IPRA) was formed to bring advocates affiliated with several groups to- Page Six gether in order to create a more effective voice with which to engage with both the Indi- Wait Nearly Over for Lafayette ana General Assembly and Indiana Department of Transportation (INDOT). Page Seven Let us be very clear about why this is necessary. IPRA does not advocate for im- Framework To Improve “On proved passenger rail service either out of a sense of nostalgia for the old days or for Time” Performance Deserves a an antipathy to the automobile. -
Northern Indiana Commuter Transportation District REQUEST for QUALIFICATIONS for DESIGN BUILD SERVICES NICTD WEST LAKE CORRIDOR
Northern Indiana Commuter Transportation District REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR DESIGN BUILD SERVICES NICTD WEST LAKE CORRIDOR PROJECT NICTD RFQ NO. 1901 March 22, 2019 I\14127189.4 I\14127189.7 Northern Indiana Commuter Transportation District TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 NICTD Project Website ................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Instructions to Proposers ............................................................................................... 2 1.3 Glossary of Definitions (Exhibit 1)............................................................................... 3 2 GENERAL INFORMATION AND PROJECT DETAILS ................................................ 3 2.1 Project Description and Site Plan ................................................................................. 3 2.2 Improvement Highlights ............................................................................................... 4 2.3 NICTD Project Goals and Objectives ........................................................................... 6 2.4 NICTD Project Team and Role..................................................................................... 7 2.5 Key Project Stakeholders ..……………………………………………………………7 2.6 Project Schedule............................................................................................................ 8 2.7 Project Budget .............................................................