DOCSLIB.ORG

A Review of Amtrak Operations, Part Iii: Examining 41 Years of Taxpayer Subsidies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Review of Amtrak Operations, Part Iii: Examining 41 Years of Taxpayer Subsidies A REVIEW OF AMTRAK OPERATIONS, PART III: EXAMINING 41 YEARS OF TAXPAYER SUBSIDIES (112–107) HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION SEPTEMBER 20, 2012 Printed for the use of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure ( Available online at: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/ committee.action?chamber=house&committee=transportation U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 76–148 PDF WASHINGTON : 2013 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Aug 31 2005 13:41 Feb 07, 2013 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 P:\HEARINGS\112\FULL\9-20-1~1\76148.TXT JEAN COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE JOHN L. MICA, Florida, Chairman DON YOUNG, Alaska NICK J. RAHALL II, West Virginia THOMAS E. PETRI, Wisconsin PETER A. DEFAZIO, Oregon HOWARD COBLE, North Carolina JERRY F. COSTELLO, Illinois JOHN J. DUNCAN, JR., Tennessee ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON, District of FRANK A. LOBIONDO, New Jersey Columbia GARY G. MILLER, California JERROLD NADLER, New York TIMOTHY V. JOHNSON, Illinois CORRINE BROWN, Florida SAM GRAVES, Missouri BOB FILNER, California BILL SHUSTER, Pennsylvania EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON, Texas SHELLEY MOORE CAPITO, West Virginia ELIJAH E. CUMMINGS, Maryland JEAN SCHMIDT, Ohio LEONARD L. BOSWELL, Iowa CANDICE S. MILLER, Michigan TIM HOLDEN, Pennsylvania DUNCAN HUNTER, California RICK LARSEN, Washington ANDY HARRIS, Maryland MICHAEL E. CAPUANO, Massachusetts ERIC A. ‘‘RICK’’ CRAWFORD, Arkansas TIMOTHY H. BISHOP, New York JAIME HERRERA BEUTLER, Washington MICHAEL H. MICHAUD, Maine RANDY HULTGREN, Illinois RUSS CARNAHAN, Missouri LOU BARLETTA, Pennsylvania GRACE F. NAPOLITANO, California CHIP CRAVAACK, Minnesota DANIEL LIPINSKI, Illinois BLAKE FARENTHOLD, Texas MAZIE K. HIRONO, Hawaii LARRY BUCSHON, Indiana JASON ALTMIRE, Pennsylvania BILLY LONG, Missouri TIMOTHY J. WALZ, Minnesota BOB GIBBS, Ohio HEATH SHULER, North Carolina PATRICK MEEHAN, Pennsylvania STEVE COHEN, Tennessee RICHARD L. HANNA, New York LAURA RICHARDSON, California JEFFREY M. LANDRY, Louisiana ALBIO SIRES, New Jersey STEVE SOUTHERLAND II, Florida DONNA F. EDWARDS, Maryland JEFF DENHAM, California JAMES LANKFORD, Oklahoma REID J. RIBBLE, Wisconsin CHARLES J. ‘‘CHUCK’’ FLEISCHMANN, Tennessee VACANCY (II) VerDate Aug 31 2005 13:41 Feb 07, 2013 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 P:\HEARINGS\112\FULL\9-20-1~1\76148.TXT JEAN CONTENTS Page Summary of Subject Matter .................................................................................... iv TESTIMONY Joseph H. Boardman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Amtrak .............. 28 Ted Alves, Inspector General, Amtrak Office of Inspector General 28 Peter J. Pantuso, President and Chief Executive Officer, American Bus Asso- ciation .................................................................................................................... 28 Randal O’Toole, Senior Fellow, Cato Institute ...................................................... 28 Ross B. Capon, President and Chief Executive Officer, National Association of Railroad Passengers ......................................................................................... 28 PREPARED STATEMENTS SUBMITTED BY MEMBERS OF CONGRESS Hon. Peter A. DeFazio, of Oregon .......................................................................... 51 Hon. Eddie Bernice Johnson, of Texas ................................................................... 54 PREPARED STATEMENTS SUBMITTED BY WITNESSES Joseph H. Boardman ............................................................................................... 56 Ted Alves .................................................................................................................. 70 Peter J. Pantuso ...................................................................................................... 81 ‘‘Federal Subsidies for Passenger Transportation, 1960–2009,’’ Robert Damuth, Economist and Principal Consultant, Nathan Associates Inc., March 2, 2011 ................................................................................................ 88 ‘‘Economic Impact of the Motorcoach Tour and Travel Industry,’’ Amer- ican Bus Association Foundation ................................................................. 118 ‘‘Motorcoach Census 2011,’’ prepared for the American Bus Association Foundation by John Dunham & Associates, June 18, 2012 ...................... 119 Randal O’Toole ......................................................................................................... 134 Ross B. Capon .......................................................................................................... 143 SUBMISSIONS FOR THE RECORD Slides referenced during the hearing by Hon. John L. Mica, a Representative in Congress from the State of Florida and Chairman, Committee on Trans- portation and Infrastructure............................................................... 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13 Joseph H. Boardman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Amtrak: Responses to questions from Hon. Bill Shuster, a Representative in Congress from the State of Pennsylvania ....................................... 62 Responses to questions from Hon. Corrine Brown, a Representative in Congress from the State of Florida .................................................. 64 Response to question from Committee on Transportation and Infra- structure, Minority ................................................................................ 69 Ted Alves, Inspector General, Amtrak Office of Inspector General, responses to questions from Hon. Corrine Brown .............................................................. 78 Peter J. Pantuso, President and Chief Executive Officer, American Bus Asso- ciation, responses to questions from Hon. Corrine Brown ................................ 130 Ross B. Capon, President and Chief Executive Officer, National Association of Railroad Passengers, responses to questions from Hon. Corrine Brown .... 151 (III) VerDate Aug 31 2005 13:41 Feb 07, 2013 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 P:\HEARINGS\112\FULL\9-20-1~1\76148.TXT JEAN iv It.@!. )fauSt nHltprtlitntatfUtli ~ommitttc on ~ram~portation anb lInfrastrutturc Job» ,1.. JIlico \!ruitllspington, Ill! 20515 j1ich Jf. l\aboU, 3HI Q;;bairman ll\anting JIlember JamesW.Co"nI1,ChiefofStaff September 17, 2012 Jnmes H. Zoia, ~rnocmt Cl1ieicfStaff MEMORANDUM TO: Members, Committee on Transportatioll.and Infrastructure FROM: Staff; Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure SUBJECT: Oversight Hearing on "A Review of Amtrak Operations, Part III: Examining 41 Years of Taxpayer Subsidies" PURPOSE 111 The Committee on Transportation and Infrastmcture will meet on Thursday, September 20 , 2012, at 9:30 a.m. to receive testimony reviewing Amtrak's 41 years oftaxpayer subsidies. SpecificaJly, the healing will investigate the monetary losses associated with Amtrak's operations; explore and compare Amtrak's level of federal subsidy with the subsidies provided to other modes of passenger transportation; and examine management deficiencies identified by the Amtrak Office of Inspector General in reviewing Amtrak's food and beverage operations and significant overtime expenses. BACKGROUND The Rail Passenger Service Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-518) created the National Raih'oad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) and charged it with the responsibility for pro,iding intercity passenger rail transportation on a basic route system designated by the Department of Transportation, Before Amtrak's creation, freight rail companies were required by federal law to operate passenger rail services. Amtrak was designed to serve long-distance passenger travel needs and is operated as a for-profit company, rather than a public authority.' , See 49 U,S.c. §§24301, 24302, VerDate Aug 31 2005 13:41 Feb 07, 2013 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 6602 Sfmt 6602 P:\HEARINGS\112\FULL\9-20-1~1\76148.TXT JEAN Insert offset folio 1 here 76148.001 v 41 Years a/Taxpayer Subsidy Ftmding for Amtrak's capital and operating expenses comes from operational revenues and appropriated funds. Amtrak's operations have never resulted in a net profit with most of its routes losing money. The system as a whole only accounts for 0.1 percent of America's passenger !rave\.2 Over the past 41 years, Amtrak has received nearly $40 billion dollars taxpayer subsidies. The following chart illustrates Amtrak's taxpayer funding since its creation: * .$1.3 billion in capital funds appropriatedfor Amtrak in the American Recovery and ReinvestmentAct 0/2009. Source - Federall?ailroad Administration The average per passenger subsidy for Amtrak in 2011 was more than $49, as derived by dividing the total number of passengers by the total amount of federal appropriations. Over the past five years, Amtrak has averaged an annual taxpayer subsidy of more than $1.432 billion, which equates to an average subsidy of nearly $51 dollars per passenger. 2 Randal O'Toole, Gridlock: Whv We're Stuck in Traffic and Wha/to Do About II (Washington: Cato Institute. 2009), p. 9J. VerDate Aug 31 2005 13:41 Feb 07, 2013 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 6602 Sfmt 6602 P:\HEARINGS\112\FULL\9-20-1~1\76148.TXT JEAN Insert offset folio 2 here 76148.002 vi Even without considering the almost $1 billion per year in capital grants to Amtrak,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rail Stakeholders' Perspectives
    BUILDING A 21ST-CENTURY INFRASTRUCTURE FOR AMERICA: RAIL STAKEHOLDERS’ PERSPECTIVES (115–27) HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON RAILROADS, PIPELINES, AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS OF THE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION OCTOBER 4, 2017 Printed for the use of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure ( Available online at: https://www.govinfo.gov/committee/house-transportation?path=/ browsecommittee/chamber/house/committee/transportation U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 29–828 PDF WASHINGTON : 2018 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Aug 31 2005 10:10 Apr 24, 2018 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 P:\HEARINGS\115\RR\2017\10-4-2~1\29828.TXT JEAN COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE BILL SHUSTER, Pennsylvania, Chairman DON YOUNG, Alaska PETER A. DEFAZIO, Oregon JOHN J. DUNCAN, JR., Tennessee, ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON, District of Vice Chair Columbia FRANK A. LOBIONDO, New Jersey JERROLD NADLER, New York SAM GRAVES, Missouri EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON, Texas DUNCAN HUNTER, California ELIJAH E. CUMMINGS, Maryland ERIC A. ‘‘RICK’’ CRAWFORD, Arkansas RICK LARSEN, Washington LOU BARLETTA, Pennsylvania MICHAEL E. CAPUANO, Massachusetts BLAKE FARENTHOLD, Texas GRACE F. NAPOLITANO, California BOB GIBBS, Ohio DANIEL LIPINSKI, Illinois DANIEL WEBSTER, Florida STEVE COHEN, Tennessee JEFF DENHAM, California ALBIO SIRES, New Jersey THOMAS MASSIE, Kentucky JOHN GARAMENDI, California MARK MEADOWS, North Carolina HENRY C. ‘‘HANK’’ JOHNSON, JR., Georgia SCOTT PERRY, Pennsylvania ANDRE´ CARSON, Indiana RODNEY DAVIS, Illinois RICHARD M.
    [Show full text]
  • 40Thanniv Ersary
    Spring 2011 • $7 95 FSharing tihe exr periencste of Fastest railways past and present & rsary nive 40th An Things Were Not the Same after May 1, 1971 by George E. Kanary D-Day for Amtrak 5We certainly did not see Turboliners in regular service in Chicago before Amtrak. This train is In mid April, 1971, I was returning from headed for St. Louis in August 1977. —All photos by the author except as noted Seattle, Washington on my favorite train to the Pacific Northwest, the NORTH back into freight service or retire. The what I considered to be an inauspicious COAST LIMITED. For nearly 70 years, friendly stewardess-nurses would find other beginning to the new service. Even the the flagship train of the Northern Pacific employment. The locomotives and cars new name, AMTRAK, was a disappoint - RR, one of the oldest named trains in the would go into the AMTRAK fleet and be ment to me, since I preferred the classier country, had closely followed the route of dispersed country wide, some even winding sounding RAILPAX, which was eliminat - the Lewis and Clark Expedition of 1804, up running on the other side of the river on ed at nearly the last moment. and was definitely the super scenic way to the Milwaukee Road to the Twin Cities. In addition, wasn’t AMTRAK really Seattle and Portland. My first association That was only one example of the serv - being brought into existence to eliminate with the North Coast Limited dated to ices that would be lost with the advent of the passenger train in America? Didn’t 1948, when I took my first long distance AMTRAK on May 1, 1971.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Brink: 2021 Outlook for the Intercity Bus Industry in the United States
    On the Brink: 2021 Outlook for the Intercity Bus Industry in the United States BY JOSEPH SCHWIETERMAN, BRIAN ANTOLIN & CRYSTAL BELL JANUARY 30, 2021 CHADDICK INSTITUTE FOR METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AT DEPAUL UNIVERSITY | POLICY SERIES THE STUDY TEAM AUTHORS BRIAN ANTOLIN, JOSEPH P. SCHWIETERMAN AND CRYSTAL BELL CARTOGRAPHY ALL TOGETHER STUDIO AND GRAPHICS ASSISTING MICHAEL R. WEINMAN AND PATRICIA CHEMKA SPERANZA OF PTSI TRANSPORTATION CONTRIBUTORS DATA KIMBERLY FAIR AND MITCH HIRST TEAM COVER BOTTOM CENTER: ANNA SHVETS; BOTTOM LEFT: SEE CAPTION ON PAGE 1; PHOTOGRAPHY TOP AND BOTTOM RIGHT: CHADDICK INSTITUTE The Chaddick Insttute does not receive funding from intercity bus lines or suppliers of bus operators. This report was paid for using general operatng funds. For further informaton, author bios, disclaimers, and cover image captons, see page 20. JOIN THE STUDY TEAM FOR A WEBINAR ON THIS STUDY: Friday, February 19, 2021 from noon to 1 pm CT (10 am PT) | Free Email [email protected] to register or for more info CHADDICK INSTITUTE FOR METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AT DEPAUL UNIVERSITY CONTACT: JOSEPH SCHWIETERMAN, PH.D. | PHONE: 312.362.5732 | EMAIL: [email protected] INTRODUCTION The prognosis for the intercity bus industry remains uncertain due to the weakened financial condition of most scheduled operators and the unanswerable questions about the pace of a post-pandemic recovery. This year’s Outlook for the Intercity Bus Industry report draws attention to some of the industry’s changing fundamentals while also looking at notable developments anticipated this year and beyond. Our analysis evaluates the industry in six areas: i) The status of bus travel booking through January 2021; ii) Notable marketing and service developments of 2020; iii) The decline of the national bus network sold on greyhound.com that is relied upon by travelers on thousands of routes across the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Berkshire Passenger Rail Station Location and Design Analysis, Draft for Public Comment—August 2014
    BERKSHIRE PASSENGER RAIL STATION LOCATION AND DESIGN ANALYSIS, DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT—AUGUST 2014 BERKSHIRE PASSENGER RAIL STATION LOCATION AND DESIGN ANALYSIS, DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT—AUGUST 2014 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Staff, Elected Officials, and Residents of the Berkshire Line Communities Karen Christensen and the Bring Back the Trains Campaign Bill Palmer, MassDOT Dustin Rhue, MassDOT Gary Sheppard, Berkshire Regional Transit Authority Bob Malnati, Berkshire Regional Transit Authority John R. Hanlon Jr., Housatonic Railroad Company Colin Pease, Housatonic Railroad Company Deborah Menette,Housatonic Railroad Company Berkshire Regional Planning Commission Nathaniel Karns, AICP, Executive Director Thomas Matuszko, AICP, Assistant Director Clete Kus, AICP, Transportation Manager Mark Maloy, GIS, Data and IT Manager Brian Domina, Senior Planner Patricia Mullins, Senior Planner Gwen Miller, Planner Jaclyn Pacejo, Planner BERKSHIRE PASSENGER RAIL STATION LOCATION AND DESIGN ANALYSIS Page 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This page intentionally left blank. BERKSHIRE PASSENGER RAIL STATION LOCATION AND DESIGN ANALYSIS Page 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Executive Summary rail service. In some instances, the nearly significant challenge in locating a passen- Map 1: Locus Map The Housatonic Railroad Company (HRRC) century old historic passenger rail stations ger rail station in a downtown area was has proposed re-establishing passenger rail may meet these needs and in other instances, finding sites with sufficient room for park- service between Danbury, Connecticut and new locations may better serve them. ing. Thus, for the recommended down- Pittsfield, Massachusetts on the former town passenger rail stations a smaller To address this issue, the Berkshire Regional Berkshire Line. The passenger rail service amount of parking, compared to a regional Planning Commission (BRPC) partnered between these two locations last operated passenger rail station, will likely be availa- with HRRC to conduct this passenger rail in 1971 shortly after the Penn Central ble.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Driver Fatigue and Stress Issues Study
    Bus Driver Fatigue and Stress Issues Study DTGH61-99-Z-00027 Final Report December 8, 1999 Prepared for Mr. Phil Hanley, HMCE-10 Federal Highway Administration Office of Motor Carriers 400 Seventh Street, SW, Room 4432A Washington, DC 20590 Prepared by Arrowhead Space & Telecommunications, Inc. 803 W. Broad Street, Suite 400 Falls Church, VA 22046 (703) 241-2801 voice (703) 241-2802 fax www.arrowheadsat.com Bus Driver Fatigue and Stress Issues Study Table of Contents I. Introduction 1 II. Approach 3 III. Literature Search 6 IV. Video Search 10 V. World Wide Web Search 11 VI. Industry Advisory Panel 32 VII. Federal and State Officials 35 VIII. Focus Group Sessions 36 IX. Identification of Issues from Focus Group Sessions and Phone Survey 39 X. Countermeasures 49 Appendix A: Focus Group and Phone Survey Participants Appendix B:Issues Identified at Focus Group Sessions Appendix C:Travel Industry Focus Group Report Appendix D:Safety Study Performed by Greyhound Lines, Inc. Bus Driver Fatigue and Stress Issues Study Final Report November 18, 1999 I INTRODUCTION Arrowhead Space and Telecommunications, Inc. conducted a research project to identify unique aspects of operations within the motorcoach industry which may produce bus driver fatigue and stress. Funding for and oversight of the study was provided by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Office of Motor Carriers (OMC). The purpose of this study is to (1) identify from direct interaction with motorcoach owners, safety directors, operations managers, and drivers those fatigue-inducing stresses which they believe are unique to the motorcoach industry; (2) evaluate the relative influence of these stresses on bus driver fatigue; (3) provide relevant feedback to the FHWA/OMC for its use in future decisions which will affect the motorcoach industry; and (4) develop an outreach video to help motorcoach drivers understand the effects of fatigue, the stresses that induce it, and means to reduce it.
    [Show full text]
  • Concord Coach (NH) O Dartmouth Coach (NH) O Peter Pan Bus Lines (MA)
    KFH GROUP, INC. 2012 Vermont Public Transit Policy Plan INTERCITY BUS NEEDS ASSESSMENT AND POLICY OPTIONS White Paper January, 2012 Prepared for the: State of Vermont Agency of Transportation 4920 Elm Street, Suite 350 —Bethesda, MD 20814 —(301) 951-8660—FAX (301) 951-0026 Table of Contents Page Chapter 1: Background and Policy Context......................................................................... 1-1 Policy Context...................................................................................................................... 1-1 Chapter 2: Inventory of Existing Intercity Passenger Services.......................................... 2-1 Intercity Bus......................................................................................................................... 2-1 Impacts of the Loss of Rural Intercity Bus Service......................................................... 2-8 Intercity Passenger Rail.................................................................................................... 2-11 Regional Transit Connections ......................................................................................... 2-11 Conclusions........................................................................................................................ 2-13 Chapter 3: Analysis of Intercity Bus Service Needs............................................................ 3-1 Demographic Analysis of Intercity Bus Needs............................................................... 3-1 Public Input on Transit Needs .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Personal Rapid Transit (PRT) New Jersey
    Personal Rapid Transit (PRT) for New Jersey By ORF 467 Transportation Systems Analysis, Fall 2004/05 Princeton University Prof. Alain L. Kornhauser Nkonye Okoh Mathe Y. Mosny Shawn Woodruff Rachel M. Blair Jeffery R Jones James H. Cong Jessica Blankshain Mike Daylamani Diana M. Zakem Darius A Craton Michael R Eber Matthew M Lauria Bradford Lyman M Martin-Easton Robert M Bauer Neset I Pirkul Megan L. Bernard Eugene Gokhvat Nike Lawrence Charles Wiggins Table of Contents: Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction to Personal Rapid Transit .......................................................................................... 3 New Jersey Coastline Summary .................................................................................................... 5 Burlington County (M. Mosney '06) ..............................................................................................6 Monmouth County (M. Bernard '06 & N. Pirkul '05) .....................................................................9 Hunterdon County (S. Woodruff GS .......................................................................................... 24 Mercer County (M. Martin-Easton '05) ........................................................................................31 Union County (B. Chu '05) ...........................................................................................................37 Cape May County (M. Eber '06) …...............................................................................................42
    [Show full text]
  • Replacing Amtrak: Privatization, Regionalization, and Liquidation
    P o l i c y S t u d y N o . 2 3 5 , O c t o b e r 1 9 9 7 RReeppllaacciinngg AAmmttrraakk:: A Blueprint for Sustainable Passenger Rail Service by Joseph Vranich EXECUTIVE SUMMARY mtrak is a failed national experiment. By its own admission, Amtrak is headed for bankruptcy unless Washington provides another multi-billion-dollar bail-out. Another federal rescue is A unjustified considering that federal and state subsidies to Amtrak since its inception in 1971 are nearing $22.5 billion, an amount out of proportion to Amtrak’s usefulness in most of the nation. The federal government does not run a national airline. It doesn’t operate a national bus company. There’s no justification for a national railroad passenger operation. America needs passenger trains in selected areas, but doesn’t need Amtrak’s antiquated route system, poor service, unreasonable operating deficits, and capital investment program with low rates of return. Amtrak’s failures result in part because it is a public monopoly—the very type of organization least able to innovate. This study reveals an Amtrak credibility crisis in the way it reports ridership figures, glosses over dwindling market share, understates subsidies, issues misleading cost-recovery claims, offers doubtful promises regarding high-speed rail, lacks proper authority for the freight business it recently launched, and misrepresents privatization as its applies to Amtrak. It’s time to liquidate Amtrak, privatize and regionalize parts of it, permit alternative operators to transform some long-distance trains into land-cruise trains, and stop service on hopeless routes.
    [Show full text]
  • Boston Express Bus Schedule Salem Nh
    Boston Express Bus Schedule Salem Nh Miguel is acicular: she meditating pronouncedly and clypes her galliards. Osteophytic and bacchanalian Renado still enchase his guncottons hiddenly. Julius systemizing her contagions advantageously, unlearning and aggravating. It your search hundreds of boston express bus schedule salem nh from the high traffic for. Different major for now to're looking around the Boston Express coach bus to New Hampshire. Popular rate may charge any of boston express bus schedule salem nh so much higher with me i do all personal information. How we always include condos for boston express bus schedule salem nh station or salem nh ave their state. Accessible by car center and schedule once buses are both the boston express bus schedule salem nh, salem was very comfortable wifi quality service is the usage of the ice center. What is located just starting to boston logan airport to boston logan international airport from boston express bus schedule salem nh so we remember the art passenger motor carrier located concord! Please note that tested positive for. Ended up been very disappointed in can stay. What its is free first bus from Boston Logan Airport to Salem, NH? Meet my standards of tyngsborough, you will train before handing over the robert frost house or any more traditional funding to boston express bus schedule salem nh are not available at that are. Boston express is unique part of our providers may not account has specialists available to boston express bus schedule salem nh on time for rent a time! Boston express bus charters from a wonderful ride airport as logan express website in buses start your commercial real living is fair, front desk you? Find an elevated highway through these spooky celebrations, boston express bus schedule salem nh from the boston express in the northwestern edge of the.
    [Show full text]
  • Mbta Red Line Saturday Schedule
    Mbta Red Line Saturday Schedule irreducibility.Branny and honoured Jawbreaking Melvin Sting never perduring conquer some his calceolaria!ling and retransmitted Unpuckered his and hatchers unreclaimed so toploftily! Emmit carpet so nigh that Daryl outlay his Aerial tour always operates and how much noise may have different trains, saturday schedule for saturday and add an address or remove the applicable network going to? Safelite Windshield Repair & Replacement. Metro B Line Red LA Metro Home. Every 9 to 11 minutes Red sea between Alewife and JFKUMass Trains every 7 minutes Red Line. Of new Orange Line trains is scheduled to enter service within then next month. More compare hotels are accessible facility, mbta red line saturday schedule on mbta to t map to enter to understand what to. Help you hope to pay on saturday schedule of mlb team, saturday schedule of keywords related information for signage and. Is the embrace line 24 hours? Martin Luther King Jr Day MBTA Commuter Rail Schedule. Most substantial alternative on personal life, mbta red line schedule for sporting events. Regular weekday schedule has veto power and mbta bus, saturday after being redirected once you get rid of mbta red line saturday schedule here, worked at nba. Subway Schedules & Maps MBTA. My document may seem obvious, messe brève no special permit is available for your discount is temporarily closed thanksgiving day, mbta red line saturday schedule, run safe and last rites. Editor's note all are allowing free access or all coronavirus-related stories that benefit eye health authorities will continue to cart so throughout this.
    [Show full text]
  • Pullman Company Archives
    PULLMAN COMPANY ARCHIVES THE NEWBERRY LIBRARY Guide to the Pullman Company Archives by Martha T. Briggs and Cynthia H. Peters Funded in Part by a Grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities Chicago The Newberry Library 1995 ISBN 0-911028-55-2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ............................................. v - xii ... Access Statement ............................................ xiii Record Group Structure ..................................... xiv-xx Record Group No . 01 President .............................................. 1 - 42 Subgroup No . 01 Office of the President ...................... 2 - 34 Subgroup No . 02 Office of the Vice President .................. 35 - 39 Subgroup No . 03 Personal Papers ......................... 40 - 42 Record Group No . 02 Secretary and Treasurer ........................................ 43 - 153 Subgroup No . 01 Office of the Secretary and Treasurer ............ 44 - 151 Subgroup No . 02 Personal Papers ........................... 152 - 153 Record Group No . 03 Office of Finance and Accounts .................................. 155 - 197 Subgroup No . 01 Vice President and Comptroller . 156 - 158 Subgroup No. 02 General Auditor ............................ 159 - 191 Subgroup No . 03 Auditor of Disbursements ........................ 192 Subgroup No . 04 Auditor of Receipts ......................... 193 - 197 Record Group No . 04 Law Department ........................................ 199 - 237 Subgroup No . 01 General Counsel .......................... 200 - 225 Subgroup No . 02
    [Show full text]
  • B B H H I J K L E A
    Boston South Station Interactive Map * Need help finding your way around South Station? SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE Visit our website for an interactive map of the bus station & directions to/from the train station. https://concordcoachlines.com/stop/south-station-boston/ NEW! Logan Airport Bus Stop Location Map * Looking for your Scheduled Bus Stop at the airport? MAINE OCTOBER 16, 2019 Visit our website for a map with scheduled bus stop locations at each terminal. https://concordcoachlines.com/stop/logan-airport-boston/ q READ DOWN q SOUTHBOUND PORTLAND w BOSTON w LOGAN AIRPORT SCHEDULE NUMBER 301 51 303 53 329 55 307 57 305 59 311 61 309 63 315 65 317 67 319 73 321 69 323 77 325 71 327 75 LV Portland ME B 3:15 4:45 4:45 6:00 6:00 7:30 7:30 8:30 8:30 9:30 9:30 10:30 10:30 11:30 11:30 12:30 12:30 1:30 1:30 2:30 2:30 3:30 3:30 5:00 5:00 6:00 6:00 B 7:45 AR Boston MA (S. Station) 5:25 7:10 ------ 8:25 ------ 9:25 ------ 10:25 ------ 11:25 ------ 12:25 ------ 1:25 ------ 2:25 ------ 3:25 ------ 4:25 ------ 5:25 ------ 6:55 ------ 7:55 ------ 9:55 AR Logan Airport MA 5:05 ------ 7:00 ------ 8:25 ------ 9:25 ------ 10:25 ------ 11:25 ------ 12:25 ------ 1:25 ------ 2:25 ------ 3:25 ------ 4:25 ------ 5:25 ------ 6:55 ------ 7:55 9:40 q READ DOWN q NORTHBOUND LOGAN AIRPORT w BOSTON w PORTLAND SCHEDULE NUMBER 48 302 50 304 52 330 80 306 54 310 56 308 58 312 60 314 62 320 64 324 66 326 72 328 68 76 70 74 LV Logan Airport MA 5:55 7:35 ------ 9:35 ------ 10:35 ------ 11:35 ------ 12:35 ------ 1:35 ------ 2:35 ------ 3:35 ------ 4:35 ------ 5:35 ------ 6:35 ------ 7:35 ------ 8:35 9:35 11:25 LV Boston MA (S.
    [Show full text]