DOCSLIB.ORG

Flood Alleviation Scheme TBAG

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

FAS – Flood Alleviation Scheme TBAG – Thames Barrier Associated Gates PLP – Property Level Product TE2100 – Thames Estuary 2100 Programme FRM – Flood Risk Management CDA – Critical Drainage Area Appendix B – 2015/16 Capital Programme Project List 2015/16 (£) Grant in Local Public Private Further Partnership County Project Title Lead Budget Forecast Aid Levy Contributions Contributions Required Berkshire Reading Thames Weir Automation EA 58,220 1,100 0 0 0 0 1,100 Berkshire West Berkshire Purley on Thames PLP EA 109,750 61,128 75,872 0 0 0 137,000 Berkshire West Berkshire Eastbury FAS EA 10,000 100,353 0 0 0 0 100,353 Berkshire West Berkshire Newbury FAS EA 3,000 69,623 0 0 0 0 69,623 Windsor and Thames Weirs Gate EA Berkshire Maidenhead Replacement 1,400,000 1,774,689 0 0 0 0 1,774,689 Windsor and EA Berkshire Maidenhead Thames Weirs Package 1 10,000 269,902 0 0 0 0 269,902 Windsor and EA Berkshire Maidenhead RTS Eco Surveys 189,000 248,141 0 0 0 0 248,141 Windsor and EA Berkshire Maidenhead Bisham - Flood Alleviation 112,153 0 19,500 0 0 0 19,500 Berkshire Wokingham Charvil flood alleviation EA 91,550 16,016 3,484 0 0 0 19,500 Berkshire Reading Harness Close SW FAS LA 5,000 0 5,000 0 0 0 5,000 Berkshire West Berkshire Waller Drive, Newbury PLP LA 40,000 0 54,000 0 0 0 54,000 Berkshire West Berkshire West Ilsley LA 22,000 0 15,895 2,805 0 0 18,700 Wellington Close & Cromwell LA Berkshire West Berkshire Road 18,000 0 13,005 2,295 0 0 15,300 Berkshire West Berkshire Grazeley Green FAS LA 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 10,000 Pednormead End, Brushwood Road and Harding Road, LA Chesham Surface Water Buckinghamshire Buckinghamshire Management Scheme 40000 40,000 0 0 0 0 40,000 Sands (High Wycombe) Surface Water Flood Risk LA Buckinghamshire Buckinghamshire Management 5,000 0 5,000 0 0 0 5,000 Buckinghamshire Buckinghamshire Marlow FAS EA 500,000 0 559,334 0 0 0 559,334 Buckinghamshire Buckinghamshire Jubilee River Landscape EA 155,000 160,490 0 0 0 0 160,490 Chesham FAS Vale Brook EA Buckinghamshire Buckinghamshire Culvert 69700 0 70,000 0 0 0 70,000 Appendix B – Flooding Investment in London London Councils’ TEC – 15 October 2015 Agenda Item 4, Page 11 FAS – Flood Alleviation Scheme TBAG – Thames Barrier Associated Gates PLP – Property Level Product TE2100 – Thames Estuary 2100 Programme FRM – Flood Risk Management CDA – Critical Drainage Area Appendix B – 2015/16 Capital Programme Project List 2015/16 (£) Grant in Local Public Private Further Partnership County Project Title Lead Budget Forecast Aid Levy Contributions Contributions Required Misbourne Flood alleviation and water management level EA Buckinghamshire Buckinghamshire strategy 45000 0 49,000 0 0 0 49,000 Buckinghamshire Buckinghamshire Chesham Culvert EA 10000 13,613 0 0 0 0 13,613 Buckinghamshire Slough (B) Slough FAS EA 361,837 0 265,300 0 0 0 265,300 Essex Essex Hillman Cottages FAS EA 10000 68,614 0 0 0 0 68,614 A120 Little Hadham Bypass EA Essex Essex flood storage area 100000 65,667 0 0 0 0 65,667 Rammey Marsh Gate and EA Essex Essex associated gearbox repairs 49812 49,812 0 0 0 0 49,812 Essex Essex Stansted Mountfitchet FAS EA 4365 0 11,214 0 0 0 11,214 Phoenix Green, Flood LA Hampshire Hampshire Alleviation Study 50,000 0 60,000 0 0 0 60,000 Sycamore Road Flood LA Hampshire Hampshire Alleviation Scheme 50,000 0 50,312 0 0 0 50,312 Middleton Gardens Flood LA Hampshire Hampshire Alleviation 20,000 0 45,982 0 0 0 45,982 Stanstead Abbots flood LA Hertfordshire Hertfordshire alleviation 10000 0 13,956 0 0 0 13,956 Region wide Radio Frequency Tagging Identification of M & EA Hertfordshire Hertfordshire E Assets 63257 63,527 0 0 0 0 63,527 Hertfordshire Hertfordshire Puckeridge FAS EA 45618 0 45,618 0 0 0 45,618 Aberford Road Oil Interceptor EA Hertfordshire Hertfordshire H&S Improvements 35000 35,000 0 0 0 0 35,000 Aston Valley Flood Storage Area, Stevenage - Statutory EA Hertfordshire Hertfordshire Remedial Works Rollover 25000 33,200 0 0 0 0 33,200 Hertfordshire Hertfordshire Cobbins Brook FAS EA 5602 6,302 0 0 0 0 6,302 Wheathampstead Mill Sluice - EA Hertfordshire Hertfordshire Upper Lee 6254 6,254 0 0 0 0 6,254 Appendix B – Flooding Investment in London London Councils’ TEC – 15 October 2015 Agenda Item 4, Page 12 FAS – Flood Alleviation Scheme TBAG – Thames Barrier Associated Gates PLP – Property Level Product TE2100 – Thames Estuary 2100 Programme FRM – Flood Risk Management CDA – Critical Drainage Area Appendix B – 2015/16 Capital Programme Project List 2015/16 (£) Grant in Local Public Private Further Partnership County Project Title Lead Budget Forecast Aid Levy Contributions Contributions Required Hertford FRM Management EA Hertfordshire Hertfordshire Study 4203 4,203 0 0 0 0 4,203 Central Watford Improvement EA Hertfordshire Hertfordshire Works 2802 0 2,802 0 0 0 2,802 Kimpton Groundwater Flood Risk Management Options LA Hertfordshire Hertfordshire Study Herts CC 55000 5,000 50,000 0 0 0 55,000 Watford Combined Surface Water and Fluvial Flood Risk LA Hertfordshire Hertfordshire Study 50000 8,750 41,250 0 0 0 50,000 Hertfordshire Hertfordshire Hertford Surface Water Study LA 50000 0 50,000 0 0 0 50,000 Long Marston and Surrounding Area Surface LA Hertfordshire Hertfordshire Water Study 18571 0 35,000 0 0 0 35,000 Darkes Lane Surface Water and Watercourse Flood Risk LA Hertfordshire Hertfordshire Modelling 30000 0 15,000 0 0 0 15,000 Thames Tidal Frontages EA London – Lee London Programme 1 10,000 19,624 0 0 0 0 19,624 Moore Brook aka Larches LA London – Lee London Channel 197000 0 282,000 0 0 0 282,000 East Enfield Flood Alleviation LA London – Lee London Scheme 50000 50,000 0 0 0 0 50,000 Enfield Town Flood Alleviation LA London – Lee London Scheme 20000 20,000 0 0 0 0 20,000 Edmonton Flood Alleviation LA London – Lee London Scheme 5000 5,000 0 0 0 0 5,000 London - North London Salmons Brook FAS EA 3339549 3,001,104 0 0 0 0 3,001,104 London – Lee London TBAG Drive Equipment EA 1,400,000 1,733,443 0 0 0 0 1,733,443 London – SE London Lewisham and Catford FAS EA 300,000 0 387,777 0 0 0 387,777 Appendix B – Flooding Investment in London London Councils’ TEC – 15 October 2015 Agenda Item 4, Page 13 FAS – Flood Alleviation Scheme TBAG – Thames Barrier Associated Gates PLP – Property Level Product TE2100 – Thames Estuary 2100 Programme FRM – Flood Risk Management CDA – Critical Drainage Area Appendix B – 2015/16 Capital Programme Project List 2015/16 (£) Grant in Local Public Private Further Partnership County Project Title Lead Budget Forecast Aid Levy Contributions Contributions Required London – North Shonks Mill - River Roding EA East London FRM Strategy - Works From 238512 0 124,847 88,549 0 0 213,396 Culvert Capacity and Trash Screen Effectiveness Investigation on the Quaggy EA London – South River in the vicinity of Eltham, East London Greenwich 150,000 80,050 0 0 0 0 80,050 London – North Braybourne Close Penstock EA West London (URN 1385) 60000 60,000 0 0 0 0 60,000 Moselle Brook Culvert EA London – Lee London Refurbishment 60000 0 60,000 0 0 0 60,000 Dagenham Brook Flood EA London – Lee London Alleviation Scheme 60000 0 60,000 0 0 0 60,000 London – North EA West London Pinn FAS 52563 0 52,563 0 0 0 52,563 London – North Tokyngton & Stonebridge FAS EA West London (LB Brent Tokyngton) 50000 0 50,000 0 0 0 50,000 London – North EA West London Greenford FMS 45000 0 47,691 0 0 0 47,691 London – North Illford, Seven Kings Water EA East London Flood Alleviation Scheme 35000 35,000 0 0 0 0 35,000 London – North EA West London Wealdstone Brook FAS 60000 15,000 0 10,000 5,000 0 30,000 Cannon Brook and Mad Bess London – North Brook Flood Management EA West London Scheme 30000 10,000 20,000 0 0 0 30,000 River Roding Strategy - Works London – South from: Woodford Surface EA West London Water FAS 13909 15,128 0 0 0 0 15,128 London – South EA West London Anton Crescent FSA 122,500 0 13,000 0 0 0 13,000 London – North EA East London B and D MEICA Package 1 12000 12,000 0 0 0 0 12,000 Appendix B – Flooding Investment in London London Councils’ TEC – 15 October 2015 Agenda Item 4, Page 14 FAS – Flood Alleviation Scheme TBAG – Thames Barrier Associated Gates PLP – Property Level Product TE2100 – Thames Estuary 2100 Programme FRM – Flood Risk Management CDA – Critical Drainage Area Appendix B – 2015/16 Capital Programme Project List 2015/16 (£) Grant in Local Public Private Further Partnership County Project Title Lead Budget Forecast Aid Levy Contributions Contributions Required Ching Brook Flood Alleviation EA London – Lee London Scheme 10000 0 10,000 0 0 0 10,000 London – North Mayes Brook - Clare Gardens EA East London and Westrow Drive 10000 0 10,000 0 0 0 10,000 Mill Hill Circus CDA Option 3 London – North flood storage south of st LA West London Josephs College Grounds 25000 0 25,000 0 0 0 25,000 Decoy Brook Catchment London – North (CDA 018) Flood Alleviation LA West London Scheme 20000 0 20,000 0 0 0 20,000 London – Highgate Flood Alleviation LA Central North London Scheme 55000 0 96,000 0 0 0 96,000 Larkspur Close Tottenham LA London – Lee London SWFAS LB Haringey 30000 0 30,000 0 0 0 30,000 Norcott Road CDA 19 SWFAS LA London – Lee London LB Hackney 30000 0 30,000 0 0 0 30,000 CDA_029: Lordship Rd, London – South Grazebrook Road, Stoke LA West London Newington 17000 0 17,000 0 0 0 17,000 London – North Kendall Close / Ullswater LA West London Close / Charville Lane 50000 0 50,000 0 0 0 50,000 London – North Chadwell Heath Flood LA East London Alleviation Scheme 25000 0 25,000 0 0 0 25,000 London – Lee London Chestnuts Showground LA 25000 0 25,000 0 0 0 25,000 Fillebrook
Recommended publications
  • HA16 Rivers and Streams London's Rivers and Streams Resource

    HA16 Rivers and Streams London's Rivers and Streams Resource

    HA16 Rivers and Streams Definition All free-flowing watercourses above the tidal limit London’s rivers and streams resource The total length of watercourses (not including those with a tidal influence) are provided in table 1a and 1b. These figures are based on catchment areas and do not include all watercourses or small watercourses such as drainage ditches. Table 1a: Catchment area and length of fresh water rivers and streams in SE London Watercourse name Length (km) Catchment area (km2) Hogsmill 9.9 73 Surbiton stream 6.0 Bonesgate stream 5.0 Horton stream 5.3 Greens lane stream 1.8 Ewel court stream 2.7 Hogsmill stream 0.5 Beverley Brook 14.3 64 Kingsmere stream 3.1 Penponds overflow 1.3 Queensmere stream 2.4 Keswick avenue ditch 1.2 Cannizaro park stream 1.7 Coombe Brook 1 Pyl Brook 5.3 East Pyl Brook 3.9 old pyl ditch 0.7 Merton ditch culvert 4.3 Grand drive ditch 0.5 Wandle 26.7 202 Wimbledon park stream 1.6 Railway ditch 1.1 Summerstown ditch 2.2 Graveney/ Norbury brook 9.5 Figgs marsh ditch 3.6 Bunces ditch 1.2 Pickle ditch 0.9 Morden Hall loop 2.5 Beddington corner branch 0.7 Beddington effluent ditch 1.6 Oily ditch 3.9 Cemetery ditch 2.8 Therapia ditch 0.9 Micham road new culvert 2.1 Station farm ditch 0.7 Ravenbourne 17.4 180 Quaggy (kyd Brook) 5.6 Quaggy hither green 1 Grove park ditch 0.5 Milk street ditch 0.3 Ravensbourne honor oak 1.9 Pool river 5.1 Chaffinch Brook 4.4 Spring Brook 1.6 The Beck 7.8 St James stream 2.8 Nursery stream 3.3 Konstamm ditch 0.4 River Cray 12.6 45 River Shuttle 6.4 Wincham Stream 5.6 Marsh Dykes
  • 36 Highbridge Street, Waltham Abbey

    36 Highbridge Street, Waltham Abbey

    36 HIGHBRIDGE STREET, WALTHAM ABBEY Flood Risk Assessment and Surface Water Drainage Statement Alcomax (Investments) Ltd SLR Ref: 408-07833-00001 Version No: 5 October 2018 36 Highbridge Street, Waltham Abbey : FRA and SWDS Filename: 181017_408-07833-00001_36HSWA_FRA_v5 SLR Ref No: 408-07833-00001 October 2018 BASIS OF REPORT This document has been prepared by SLR Consulting Limited with reasonable skill, care and diligence, and taking account of the manpower, timescales and resources devoted to it by agreement with Alcomax (Investments) Ltd. (the Client) as part or all of the services it has been appointed by the Client to carry out. It is subject to the terms and conditions of that appointment. SLR shall not be liable for the use of or reliance on any information, advice, recommendations and opinions in this document for any purpose by any person other than the Client. Reliance may be granted to a third party only in the event that SLR and the third party have executed a reliance agreement or collateral warranty. Information reported herein may be based on the interpretation of public domain data collected by SLR, and/or information supplied by the Client and/or its other advisors and associates. These data have been accepted in good faith as being accurate and valid. The copyright and intellectual property in all drawings, reports, specifications, bills of quantities, calculations and other information set out in this report remain vested in SLR unless the terms of appointment state otherwise. This document may contain information of a specialised and/or highly technical nature and the Client is advised to seek clarification on any elements which may be unclear to it.
  • Rye Meads Water Cycle Study\F-Reports\Phase 3\5003-Bm01390-Bmr-18 Water Cycle Strategy Final Report.Doc

    Rye Meads Water Cycle Study\F-Reports\Phase 3\5003-Bm01390-Bmr-18 Water Cycle Strategy Final Report.Doc

    STEVENAGE BOROUGH COUNCIL RYE MEADS WATER CYCLE STRATEGY DETAILED STUDY REPORT FINAL REPORT Hyder Consulting (UK) Limited 2212959 Aston Cross Business Village 50Rocky Lane Aston Birmingham B6 5RQ United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0)870 000 3007 Fax: +44 (0)870 000 3907 www.hyderconsulting.com STEVENAGE BOROUGH COUNCIL RYE MEADS WATER CYCLE STRATEGY DETAILED STUDY REPORT FINAL REPORT James Latham/ Dan Author Vogtlin Checker Renuka Gunasekara Approver Mike Irwin Report No 5003-BM01390-BMR-18-Water Cycle Strategy Final Report Date 5th October 2009 This report has been prepared for STEVENAGE BOROUGH COUNCIL in accordance with the terms and conditions of appointment for WATER CYCLE STRATEGY dated April 2008. Hyder Consulting (UK) Limited (2212959) cannot accept any responsibility for any use of or reliance on the contents of this report by any third party. RYE MEADS WATER CYCLE STRATEGY—DETAILED STUDY REPORT Hyder Consulting (UK) Limited-2212959 k:\bm01390- rye meads water cycle study\f-reports\phase 3\5003-bm01390-bmr-18 water cycle strategy final report.doc Revisions Prepared Approved Revision Date Description By By - 2/10/2008 Draft Report Structure JL 1 18/11/2008 First Report Draft JL/DV MI 2 27/01/2009 Draft Report JL/DV MI 3-13 03/04/2009 Final Draft Report as amended by stakeholder comments JL/DV RG 14 09/07/2009 Final Draft Report JL/DV RG 15 10/07/2009 Final Draft Report Redacted JL/DV RG 16 21/08/2009 Final Draft Report JL/DV RG 17 21/09/2009 Final Draft following core project team meeting comments JL/DV RG 18 05/10/2009 Final Report JL/DV MI RYE MEADS WATER CYCLE STRATEGY—DETAILED STUDY REPORT Hyder Consulting (UK) Ltd-2212959 k:\bm01390- rye meads water cycle study\f-reports\phase 3\5003-bm01390-bmr-18 water cycle strategy final report.doc CONTENTS 1 Introduction and Summary of Key Outcomes ....................................
  • Local Plan Respresentations

    Local Plan Respresentations

    29 January 2018 bc Local Plan Regulation 19 Representation Planning Policy Team Epping Forest District Council Civic Offices Ben Thomas 323 High Street Epping Essex CM16 4BZ 33 Margaret Street London W1G 0JD T: +44 (0) 20 7499 8644 savills.com Epping Forest District Council Submission Version Local Plan We write on behalf of Crest Nicholson in relation to the site known as the former Pickfield Nursery at Pick Hill, Waltham Abbey (SLAA Reference SR-0161). Flawed / Absent Local Plan site selection process to-date: Pickfield Nursery was submitted to EFDC in response to the Call for Sites consultation in 2008 and has subsequently been promoted through the current Local Plan process since its inception in 2012. EFDC’s July 2012 SLAA referred to Pickfield Nursery as site SR-0161 but incorrectly identified it as a duplicate site with a much larger parcel (SLAA Reference SR-0020). Representations were then submitted in October 2012 highlighting this mistake. However, despite the submission of detailed representations and subsequent regular liaison with EFDC’s officers (including a positive formal pre-application meeting), EFDC’s Site Selection evidence base published in 2016 discounted Pickfield Nursery prior to Stage 1 of the selection process, once again incorrectly considering it as a duplicate site. Pickfield Nursery was finally acknowledged as an individual site in the Local Plan evidence base in the “Sites for consideration following Regulation 18 consultation” list published in July 2017. However, at the time of writing these representations (26th January 2018, one working day before the Pre-Submission consultation deadline) an assessment of these sites has still not been undertaken and Appendix C1 of the Report on Site Selection (December 2017) has not been completed.
  • Evaluating the Risk of Non-Point Source Pollution From

    Evaluating the Risk of Non-Point Source Pollution From

    Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11(1), 601613, 2007 Evaluating the risk of non-point source pollution from biosolids: integrated modelling of nutrient losses at field and catchment scales www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/11/601/2007 © Author(s) 2007. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License. Evaluating the risk of non-point source pollution from biosolids: integrated modelling of nutrient losses at field and catchment scales P.G. Whitehead1, A.L. Heathwaite2, N.J. Flynn1, A.J. Wade1 and P.F. Quinn3 1Aquatic Environments Research Centre, Department of Geography, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 6AB, UK 2Centre for Sustainable Water Management, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, UK 3Department of Civil Engineering, University of Newcastle, NewcastleUK Email for corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract A semi-distributed model, INCA, has been developed to determine the fate and distribution of nutrients in terrestrial and aquatic systems. The model simulates nitrogen and phosphorus processes in soils, groundwaters and river systems and can be applied in a semi-distributed manner at a range of scales. In this study, the model has been applied at field to sub-catchment to whole catchment scale to evaluate the behaviour of biosolid-derived losses of P in agricultural systems. It is shown that process-based models such as INCA, applied at a wide range of scales, reproduce field and catchment behaviour satisfactorily. The INCA model can also be used to generate generic information for risk assessment. By adjusting three key variables: biosolid application rates, the hydrological connectivity of the catchment and the initial P-status of the soils within the model, a matrix of P loss rates can be generated to evaluate the behaviour of the model and, hence, of the catchment system.
  • LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 1 BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD

    LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 1 BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD

    LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 1 BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD ACC/2423 Reference Description Dates LEE CONSERVANCY BOARD ENGINEER'S OFFICE Engineers' reports and letter books LEE CONSERVANCY BOARD: ENGINEER'S REPORTS ACC/2423/001 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1881 Jan-1883 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/002 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1884 Jan-1886 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/003 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1887 Jan-1889 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/004 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1890 Jan-1893 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/005 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1894 Jan-1896 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/006 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1897 Jan-1899 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/007 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1903 Jan-1903 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/008 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1904 Jan-1904 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/009 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1905 Jan-1905 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/010 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1906 Jan-1906 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 2 BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD ACC/2423 Reference Description Dates ACC/2423/011 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1908 Jan-1908 Lea navigation/ stort navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/012 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1912 Jan-1912 Lea navigation/ stort navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/013 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1913 Jan-1913 Lea navigation/ stort navigation
  • Surface Water Management Plan London Borough Of

    Surface Water Management Plan London Borough Of

    SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN DRAIN LONDON LONDON BOROUGH OF ENFIELD FINAL DRAFT v2.0 Quality Management Quality Management DOCUMENT INFORMATION Title: Surface Water Management Plan for London Borough of Enfield Owner: Ian Russell Version: v3.0 Status: Final Project Number: CS/046913 File Name: DLT2_GP4_Enfield_SWMP Final_V3.0 REVISION HISTORY Date of Summary of Changes Completed By Version Issue Initial draft SI 12/06/2011 1.0 Final Draft SI 01/08/2011 2.0 Final IR 05/01/2012 3.0 AUTHOR Name Organisation and Role Stephanie Ip Senior Consultant, Capita Symonds Ruth Farrar Consultant, Capita Symonds APPROVALS Name Title Signature Date Ruth Goodall Director, Capita Symonds Principal Consultant, Capita Michael Arthur Symonds Ian Russell Senior Engineer, LB Enfield Kevin Reid Programme Manager DISTRIBUTION Name Organisation and Role Ian Russell Senior Engineer, LB Enfield Kevin Reid Programme Manager, GLA RELATED DOCUMENTS Date of Doc Ref Document Title Author Version Issue i Acknowledgements Acknowledgements A number of people and organisations outside Enfield Council have contributed to this Surface Water Management Plan. Their assistance is greatly appreciated, and in particularly inputs and information provided by: • The British Geological Survey • British Waterways • Drain London Group 4 boroughs: o London Borough of Haringey o London Borough of Hackney o London Borough of Waltham Forest o London Borough of Newham o London Borough of Tower Hamlets • The Environment Agency • The Greater London Authority • London Councils • The London Fire Brigade • Network Rail • Thames Water • Transport for London and London Underground ii Executive Summary Executive Summary This document forms the Surface Water Management Plan (SWMP) for the London Borough (LB) of Enfield.
  • 15 Road Drainage and the Water Environment

    15 Road Drainage and the Water Environment

    HIGHWAYS AGENCY – M4 JUNCTIONS 3 TO 12 SMART MOTORWAY 15 ROAD DRAINAGE AND THE WATER ENVIRONMENT 15.1 Introduction 15.1.1 This chapter assesses the impacts of the Scheme on road drainage and the water environment during construction and operation, focussing on the effects of highway drainage on the quality and hydrology of receiving waters. In view of the long design-life of the Scheme (30 years for new gantries, 40 years for new carriageway construction, and 120 years for new bridges), the decommissioning phase of the Scheme has not been considered in this chapter because its effects are not predicted to be worse than the effects assessed during the construction and operational phases. The chapter assesses four principal impacts: a) effects of routine runoff on surface water bodies; b) effects of routine runoff on groundwater; c) pollution impacts from spillages; and d) flood impacts. 15.1.2 Although Interim Advice Note (”IAN”) 161/13 ‘Managed Motorways, All lane running’ (Ref 15-1) has scoped out the assessment of ‘Road Drainage and the Water Environment’ for smart motorway schemes, the assessment is required to ensure the protection of the water environment, to prevent its degradation, and ensure adequate mitigation measures are in place to prevent any adverse impacts. 15.1.3 The road drainage and water environment assessment for the Scheme has been undertaken in accordance with standard industry practice and statutory guidance. 15.1.4 This chapter details the methodology followed for the assessment, and summarises the regulatory and policy framework relating to road drainage and the water environment.
  • Northern Thames Basin Area Profile: Supporting Documents

    Northern Thames Basin Area Profile: Supporting Documents

    National Character 111: Northern Thames Basin Area profile: Supporting documents www.naturalengland.org.uk 1 National Character 111: Northern Thames Basin Area profile: Supporting documents Introduction National Character Areas map As part of Natural England’s responsibilities as set out in the Natural Environment White Paper1, Biodiversity 20202 and the European Landscape Convention3, we are revising profiles for England’s 159 National Character Areas (NCAs). These are areas that share similar landscape characteristics, and which follow natural lines in the landscape rather than administrative boundaries, making them a good decision-making framework for the natural environment. NCA profiles are guidance documents which can help communities to inform their decision-making about the places that they live in and care for. The information they contain will support the planning of conservation initiatives at a landscape scale, inform the delivery of Nature Improvement Areas and encourage broader partnership working through Local Nature Partnerships. The profiles will also help to inform choices about how land is managed and can change. Each profile includes a description of the natural and cultural features that shape our landscapes, how the landscape has changed over time, the current key drivers for ongoing change, and a broad analysis of each area’s characteristics and ecosystem services. Statements of Environmental Opportunity (SEOs) are suggested, which draw on this integrated information. The SEOs offer guidance on the critical issues, which could help to achieve sustainable growth and a more secure environmental future. 1 The Natural Choice: Securing the Value of Nature, Defra NCA profiles are working documents which draw on current evidence and (2011; URL: www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/cm80/8082/8082.pdf) 2 knowledge.
  • Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead

    Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead

    Contents 1.0 FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT 1.1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment 1.2 Winter 2012 Floods 1.2.1 Maidenhead Windsor and Eton FAS 1.2.2 Temporary defences in Windsor 1.2.3 Old Windsor 1.2.4 Datchet 1.2.5 Wraysbury 1.3 Recovery Projects 1.3.1 Taplow Washout 1.3.2 Cookham and North Maidenhead Flood Wall Repairs 1.3.3 Black Potts Washout 1.3.4 Eton End School Bund, Datchet 1.3.5 Bund Removal, Datchet 1.4 Community Engagement 1.4.1 Cookham Parish 1.4.2 Bisham Flood Alleviation Scheme 1.4.3 Datchet 1.4.4 Wraysbury 1.4.5 Ham Island 1.4.6 River Level Data and ‘Parishes Live’ 1.4.7 Environment Agency.Gov Website Live 1.5 Insurance Related Information 1.6 River Maintenance 1.7 River Bed levels surveys 1.8 Flooded Land at Little Common Farm, Eton Wick 1.9 Flood and Water Management Act 2.0 PLANNING 2.1 Planning Charge 2.2 Maidenhead Waterways Restoration and Town Centre Regeneration 2.3 Travellers Site - Datchet 2.4 Bray Road Maidenhead – proposed school 2.5 RBWM Borough Local Plan 2014 Preferred options consultation 2.6 Position Statement for replacement dwellings 3.0 WASTE 3.1 Brayfield Farm 3.2 Horton Brook Quarry – Colnbrook 4.0 HYDROPOWER 5.0 WATERWAYS 5.1 Speed and Wash campaign 5.2 Waterways Volunteers 5.3 Magna Carta Celebrations 6.0 WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE 7.0 WATER RESOURCES 1 OFFICIAL 1.0 FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT 1.1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment We recently met to discuss the River Thames Scheme (Datchet to Teddington), which is included in the Royal Borough’s SFRA.
  • Leyton Jubilee Park I Marsh Lane Bridge Reconstruction

    Leyton Jubilee Park I Marsh Lane Bridge Reconstruction

    http://mspweb.walthamforest.gov.uk/Planning/lg/GFPlanningDocumen... 1 0 JAN 2013 London Borough of Wnltham Forest Leyton Jubilee Park I Marsh Lane Bridge Reconstruction Flood Risl< Assessmen t Highways Mainlenance Group Euvirotunen(al Services LONDON SOUROUGH WALTBAM FOREST Low Hall Depol Argall Avenue Lcylon London E I07AS 1 of 1 23/02/2013 15:19 http://mspweb.walthamforest.gov.uk/Planning/lg/GFPlanningDocumen... ~·!}\( :~ ~ . DOCUMENT CONTROL SHEET Project Name Leyton Jubi ee Park I Marsh Lane Bridge Reconstruction Project TUie Rood Risk Assessment OS Map Rei 537076 E. 186955 N Location Le'yton E17 Orgamsat1on Contact Date Copms Waltham Forest A Prud'homme 24/12/12 1 1 of 1 23/02/2013 15:20 http://mspweb.walthamforest.gov.uk/Planning/lg/GFPlanningDocumen... Leyton Jubilee Park I Marsh Lane Bridge Reconstruction Flood Risk Assessment Contents 1.0 Executive Summary 1 2.0 Location 1 3.0 Geographical Area 1 4.0 Environmont Agency Requirement 2 5.0 Available Information 4 6.0 Flood Risk at Bridge Location 5 7.0 W alkover Survey 5 7.1 Habilats 5 7.2 Protected and Notable Species 5 7.3 Invasive Species 6 8.0 Topographical survey 6 9.0 Utilities Survey 6 10.0 Habitat Survey and Protectod Spoclos Assossment 6 11.0 Flood Risk Assessment, Footbridge Dovelopment and Constrain!$ 7 11.1 Flood Zone 7 11.2 Appropriate uses 7 11 .3 Dimensional Requirements of the Proposed Footbridge 7 11.4 Watercourse Reprofiling and Clearances 8 11.5 Flood Risk AsseSSI)lont and Mitigation 8 Appendices AppendiM A - Drawing No: A308·FRA·01 • Topographical Survey -Drawing No.
  • Lee Valley Regional Park Landscape Character Assessment

    Lee Valley Regional Park Landscape Character Assessment

    LCT C: Urban Valley Floor with Marshlands SPA, which provides a nationally important habitat for overwintering birds. Cultural Influences 4.64 The low-lying land of rich alluvial deposits supported a system of grazing, referred to as the Lammas system5 from the Anglo-Saxon period to the end of the C19th. Grazing rights on the marshes were extinguished by the early C20th and a substantial proportion of the marshlands, with the exception of Walthamstow Marshes, were then modified by industrial activities and landfill, including the dumping of bomb rubble after WW2. In the 1950 and 60s the construction of flood relief channels ended the periodic inundation of the marshlands. 4.65 Communication routes through the valley floor proliferated over the C20th, including pylons, roads and railway lines mounted on embankments, but residential and industrial development remains largely confined to the margins. 4.66 Public access and recreation now characterises much of the marshlands, with some areas managed as nature reserves. However substantial infrastructure, such as the railway lines and flood relief channels and adjacent industrial development, means access through and into the marshes from surrounding urban areas is often severed. The tow-path following the River Lee Navigation provides a continuous link along the valley for visitors to enjoy the landscape. 5 A system of grazing whereby cattle was grazed only after the cutting and collection of hay Lee Valley Regional Park Landscape Strategy 85 April 2019 LCA C1: Rammey Marsh Lee Valley Regional Park Landscape Strategy 86 April 2019 LCA C1: Rammey Marsh Occasional long views out to wooded valley sides between Residential properties overlooking the southern area across the riverside vegetation.