DOCSLIB.ORG

London in the Thames Catchment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
London in the Thames Catchment NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED London in the Thames catchment Business Case: Flood Risk and the six year investment programme London in the Thames catchment 1. Summary, Headline facts and statistics London’s flood risk Surface Water Rivers/Sea Residential Non Total Residential Non Total residential residential High 59,000 7,000 66,000 11,000 3,000 14,000 Medium 96,000 13,000 109,000 29,000 5,000 34,000 Low 445,000 54,000 499,000 423,000 56,000 485,000 Total at 600,000 74,000 674,000 465,000 65,000 536,000 risk The Six Year Investment Programme The Thames Regional Flood & Coastal Committee decide (RFCC) which projects make up the programme. The allocation of central Government funding to the projects is based on Defra Policy. £180m of Flood Defence Grant in Aid (FD GiA) investment planned in the Thames Estuary to maintain the World Class standard of protection for London from tidal flooding. £77m of FD GiA investment within London in the next six years to directly protect 10,000 properties from tidal flooding £36m of FD GiA investment planned to reduce the risk of river and surface water flooding to 6,800 properties in London At least £25m of contributions are required to unlock all of this investment over the next six years. Levy provides a mechanism for local authorities to pool resources to achieve this. The return on the investment in flood risk management is high. Within Thames the average benefit to cost ratio’s for schemes within the six year investment programme are; Protecting London from tidal flooding: 117:1 Reducing the risk from river flooding: 10:1 Reducing the risk from surface water flooding: 7:1 Levy The levy is used only to part-fund capital projects led by either local authorities or the Environment Agency. All other Agency costs are met by central Government. London in the Thames catchment 2. How flood risk management is funded and how value for money is ensured The flood risks across London, an illustration of the impacts of local flooding during a typical year (2014) along with examples of what gets built through the investment is set out in a series of Annexe’s (1 to 5) at the end of this paper. These are the factors that drive investment. The core of this paper focuses on value for money, governance, funding and the six year programme. Ensuring value for money Every capital project has to pass a series of gateways to ensure they are economically and technically robust before construction can happen. The National Audit Office scrutinise these processes every two to three years. Their most recent report was published this November. Their conclusions on the flood and coastal risk programme are set out below: “The Agency has a robust process in place to prioritise maintenance spend, based on the benefits and risk identified by flood risk model data. Annually, it undertakes an exercise to allocate funding for asset maintenance, using its national database of maintenance needs.” “Benefit–cost assessments for capital flood defence projects are robust and well thought through. The Agency’s approach to benefit–cost analysis is consistent with HM Treasury’s Green Book. The Agency has produced detailed guidance on identifying the typical benefits and costs of projects, and investment appraisals are clear and thorough.” “There is a healthy benefit–cost ratio for floods projects. The Agency anticipated it would achieve a programme benefit–cost ratio of at least 8:1 for its flood defence projects funded through grant-in-aid for the current spending review period. As of March 2014, it has achieved 9.5:1” “The Agency has made efficiencies, including a saving of £44 million between 2011 and 2014 in respect of capital construction projects. However, the risk of more severe weather events will put pressure on existing budgets.” Source: NAO Report into Strategic Flood Risk Management, November 2014 http://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Strategic-flood-risk-management.pdf How projects are assessed Table One – How Projects are assessed Stage The tests, costs and outcome London Picture Pre-Gateway 0 – Usually a short assessment of evidence to establish whether there Decision to could be a capital solution to a flooding problem. A high level investigate a assessment of costs and benefits to establish whether the project problem should be put forward onto a future programme. Generally carried out internally by Local Authorities or the EA. There is a need to produce sufficient evidence for the RFCC approve putting the project on the programme and developing a business case. Gateway 0 – All business cases are carried out using a common appraisal 67 Projects Decision to method that ensures compliance with MH Treasury rules. The develop a business case needs to provide evidence to show: £27m of investment business case for the economic return on a project is (lifetime costs, houses planned within the 6 a project. protected, commercial damages avoided) year programme the costs of construction that the risks are understood and accounted for that the funding contributions are secure London in the Thames catchment The work will involve some flood modeling, engineering assessment of options and consultation with the affected community. On a simple project – for example to construct a flood wall to protect a small group of houses this stage may only take a few months. On a large complex project such as the £15m Lewisham and Catford scheme this phase can take 18 to 24 months. Gateway 1 – If the business case is approved, the project can progress to Approval of detailed design. On larger projects, where the appraisal stage is business case particularly detailed we award ‘Design and Build’ contracts where it is more efficient to do so. This stage ensures that the option 24 Projects selected through the business case can be built for the cost expected. £26m of investment planned within the 6 Gateway 2 – This gateway checks that the project design has been carried out in year programme Approval of accordance with the approved business case and that the client detailed design has been involved in the design process and approves the detailed design. Gateway 3 – This gateway checks that a contract may be awarded and that Construction everything necessary is in place to ensure that there will be value 26 Projects Contract Award for money. This will include ensuring the procurement strategy is in place, that all land, legal and planning agreements are secure, £68m of investment ensuring sufficient time for mobilisaion and that risks will be planned managed. Flood Risk Management funding There are three main sources of funding for Flood Risk projects; Flood Defence Grant in Aid from central Government Local levy contributions Partner / beneficiary contributions The maximum amount of central Government funding on offer to each project is based on the value of qualifying benefits for each of the outcomes set by Defra. Those projects that have large outcomes relative to their cost are eligible for 100% funding from central Government. For example, works to the tidal defences through London are eligible for full funding. Many projects to address surface water, groundwater and river flooding do require contributions to secure the central Government funding and progress. The RFCC take the decisions on where levy contributions should be used to achieve this. Across the 6 year programme in Thames the RFCC have agreed that levy should be used to make up the difference between central Government funding (and beneficiary contributions) and the total cost of a project for surface water and groundwater projects being implemented by Local Authorities. This approach recognises that Local Authorities have only had these responsibilities for a few years and there is a very significant surface water risk across urban locations in Thames. Governance & roles London in the Thames catchment Regional Flood & Coastal The RFCC brings together members appointed by Lead Local Flood Committee Authorities and independent members with relevant experience: to ensure there are coherent plans for identifying, communicating and managing flood and coastal erosion risks across catchments and shorelines; to promote efficient, targeted and risk-based investment in flood and coastal erosion risk management that optimises value for money and benefits for local communities; to provide a link between the Environment Agency, LLFAs, other risk management authorities, and other relevant bodies to engender mutual understanding of flood and coastal erosion risks in its area Environment Agency The EA is responsible for taking a strategic overview of the management of all sources of flooding and coastal erosion. This includes, for example, setting the direction for managing the risks through strategic plans; providing evidence and advice to inform Government policy and support others; and providing a framework to support local delivery. The Agency also has operational responsibility for managing the risk of flooding from main rivers, reservoirs, estuaries and the sea. The EA requires the consent of the Regional Flood & Coastal Committee to implement its programmes. Lead Local Flood Lead Local Flood Authorities (upper tier councils) are responsible for Authority developing, maintaining and applying a strategy for local flood risk management in their areas and for maintaining a register of flood risk assets. They also have lead responsibility for managing the risk of flooding from surface water, groundwater and ordinary watercourses. Water and sewerage Water and Sewerage Companies are responsible for managing the risks companies of flooding from water and foul or combined sewer systems providing drainage from buildings and yards. All Risk Management Under the Flood and Water Management Act 2010 all risk management Authorities authorities mentioned above have a duty to co-operate with each other and to share data.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Watford Junction – Bushey – Harrow & Wealdstone – Wembley Central – London
    General information Notes & symbols ) PLUSBUS through ticketing available Holiday periods London Northwestern Customer Transport Focus & We will be running amended timetables over Relations web: transportfocus.org.uk bus service Christmas, Easter and May bank holidays. Details You can get in touch with our customer relations email: [email protected] 4 will be available in online journey planners and team between 0700–1900 on weekdays, and twitter: @transportfocus operated by 4 coach train 8 information displayed at our stations. 0800–1600 at weekends. tel: 0300 123 2350 operated by 8 coach train 12 post: Freepost (RTEH-XAGE-BYKZ), operated by 12 coach train Bring your bike web: londonnorthwesternrailway.co.uk/contact-us Transport Focus, PO Box 5594, Bikes (except tandems) are welcome on board our tel: 0333 311 0006 Southend-on-Sea, SS1 9PZ Services operated by London Northwestern trains but please be extra careful when it’s busy. On (standard call rates) Railway unless otherwise shown. weekdays, only folding bikes are allowed on trains post: Freepost London Northwestern Railway, Rail User Groups arriving at London Euston between 0700 –1000, Customer Relations If you’d like to be more involved with the SN operated by Southern and departing between 1600 –1900. development of rail services, why not join your London Travelwatch local rail user group. b occasionally this train may be formed of 8 Getting assistance at the station web: londontravelwatch.org.uk coaches. Passengers travelling to Bushey Call us on 0333 311 0006 if you need some help email: [email protected] Watford Rail Users Group must travel in the front 4 coaches only.
    [Show full text]
  • LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 1 BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD
    LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 1 BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD ACC/2423 Reference Description Dates LEE CONSERVANCY BOARD ENGINEER'S OFFICE Engineers' reports and letter books LEE CONSERVANCY BOARD: ENGINEER'S REPORTS ACC/2423/001 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1881 Jan-1883 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/002 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1884 Jan-1886 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/003 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1887 Jan-1889 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/004 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1890 Jan-1893 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/005 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1894 Jan-1896 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/006 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1897 Jan-1899 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/007 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1903 Jan-1903 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/008 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1904 Jan-1904 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/009 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1905 Jan-1905 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/010 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1906 Jan-1906 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 2 BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD ACC/2423 Reference Description Dates ACC/2423/011 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1908 Jan-1908 Lea navigation/ stort navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/012 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1912 Jan-1912 Lea navigation/ stort navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/013 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1913 Jan-1913 Lea navigation/ stort navigation
    [Show full text]
  • Standard-Tube-Map.Pdf
    Tube map 123456789 Special fares apply Special fares Check before you travel 978868 7 57Cheshunt Epping apply § Custom House for ExCeL Chesham Watford Junction 9 Station closed until late December 2017. Chalfont & Enfield Town Theydon Bois Latimer Theobalds Grove --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Watford High Street Bush Hill Debden Shenfield § Watford Hounslow West Amersham Cockfosters Park Turkey Street High Barnet Loughton 6 Step-free access for manual wheelchairs only. A Chorleywood Bushey A --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Croxley Totteridge & Whetstone Oakwood Southbury Chingford Buckhurst Hill § Lancaster Gate Rickmansworth Brentwood Carpenders Park Woodside Park Southgate 5 Station closed until August 2017. Edmonton Green Moor Park Roding Grange Valley --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hatch End Mill Hill East West Finchley Arnos Grove Hill Northwood Silver Street Highams Park § Victoria 4 Harold Wood Chigwell West Ruislip Headstone Lane Edgware Bounds Green Step-free access is via the Cardinal Place White Hart Lane Northwood Hills Stanmore Hainault Gidea Park Finchley Central Woodford entrance. Hillingdon Ruislip Harrow & Wood Green Pinner Wealdstone Burnt Oak Bruce Grove Ruislip Manor Harringay Wood Street Fairlop Romford --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Canons Park Green South Woodford East Finchley Uxbridge Ickenham North Harrow Colindale Turnpike Lane Lanes
    [Show full text]
  • Harrow and Wealdstone Area Action Plan: Issues and Options Consultation Document
    Contents Harrow and Wealdstone Area Action Plan: Issues and Options Consultation Document 1. Introduction 2 2. Policy Context 6 3. Portrait of the Intensification Area 9 4. Key Issues, Challenges and Drivers 15 5. Generating the Options 21 6. Spatial Development Strategy 28 Options 7. Delivery and Implementation 40 Harrow and Wealdstone Area Action Plan: Issues and Options Consultation Document 1 Introduction 1.1 The Harrow Core Strategy identifies the Harrow and Wealdstone Intensification Area as a focus for future growth and development within the Borough. The Intensification Area, shown in Figure 1, is recognised in the replacement London Plan and the Harrow Core Strategy as being a location that can accommodate change and has capacity to do so. However, such change must be managed in a clear and comprehensive manner. 1.2 As set out in the Core Strategy, the Intensification Area is not just about providing for new development and physical growth, it is also about regeneration and the realisation of the social benefits and improvements to the overall quality of place that new development can deliver. The Council and the Greater London Authority (GLA), in partnership with Homes and Communities Agency, Transport for London and the London Development Agency, are therefore preparing a joint Area Action Plan for the Intensification Area. The purpose of the Area Action Plan is to provide a detailed and pro-active policy framework to guide development, regeneration and investment decisions across the area over the next fifteen years and beyond. Picture 1.1 Boundary of the Harrow and Wealdstone Intensification Area 1.3 In respect of the boundary for the Intensification Area, this has already been confirmed through the Core Strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Buses from Northwick Park and Kenton
    Buses from Northwick Park and Kenton Harrow Weald Route finder Bannister Playing Fields 182 Bus route Towards Bus stops Uxbridge Road Kenton Lane 114 Mill Hill Broadway DGHK All Saints’ Mews Richmond Gardens HATCH Ruislip CFIL N18 182 Brent Cross a Harrow Weald END Harrow Weald Bus Garage Shopping Centre Courtenay Avenue/ Long Long Elmes Long Elmes Elmes EDGWARE Harrow Weald = Hatch End Headstone Lane H14 183 Golders Green DGHK Hatch End Wealdstone High Road Belmont Circle Canons Park Edgware St. Thomas’ Drive Wealdstone Baptist Church WEALDSTONE Pinner CFIL Locket Road Apex Corner 186 Brent Cross «÷ Headstone Lane Borrowdale Avenue Kenton Lane Shopping Centre Locket Road Locket Road Clifton Avenue Montrose Road Warham Road Harrow Weald High Street Mill Hill Circus 223 Harrow F«IL The Wealdstone Centre Kenton Lane Wembley Queens Avenue GH≤K 483 Ealing Hospital = Harrow & Christchurch Avenue Streatfield Road Wealdstone Palmerston Road Kenmore Avenue Morley Crescent West 114 Harrow a Wealdstone High Road Christchurch Avenue Christchurch Avenue Queensbury Burnt Oak Mill Hill H9 Harrow via Wealdstone DEGH≤KM The Wealdstone Centre Harrow Leisure Centre Kingshill Avenue Kenton Broadway Library H10 Harrow C«ILN Headstone Lane Headstone Drive Grahame Park H14 Hatch End Harrow Crown Court Kenton Lane Quaker’s Course y Headstone Gardens Station Road GREENHILL Hunters Grove Harrow View Harrow View Harrow Civic Centre/Harrow Mosque H18 Harrow ILN Pinner Park Avenue 183 Kenton Lane H19 Harrow via Wealdstone EGHKM Pinner Headstone Gardens Harrow View Kenton Road Kenton Road Kenton Road Kenton Road PINNER Pinner View Kodak Sports Ground Kenton Lane Charlton Road Clifton Road Night buses Harrow View Station Road Kenton Road Kenton Road Kingsbury Bus route Towards Bus stops Pinner Road Safari Cinema Southfield Park Headstone Drive Kenton Park Shrewsbury Avenue Watford H19 Kenton Road Avenue N18 Harrow Weald = continues to K Way North Harrow Harrow View St.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette, 24 May, 1912. 3789
    THE LONDON GAZETTE, 24 MAY, 1912. 3789 were respectively called " The" Central order, direct, and declare, and it is hereby Coroner's District," " The Eastern Coroner's ordered, directed, and declared, that: — , District," and " The Western Coroner's District ": ... - (1) On the occurrence of the next vacancy in the office of Coroner for the existing And whereas a petition has been pre- Western Coroner's District of the county of sented to Hisi Majesty by the County Council Middlesex that district shall be altered by of Middlesex, praying that on the occurrence the transfer from the said Western District of the next vacancy in the office of Coroner for to the existing Central Coroner's District of the existing Western Coroner's District of the the said county of the following parishes: —. said county that district should be altered by Edgware, Great Stanmore, Harrow-on-the- the transfer from the said Western District to Hill, Harrow Weald, Kingsbury, Littla the existing Central Coroner's District of the Stanmore, Pinner, Wealdstone, Wembley; said county of the following parishes:—Edg- (2) On the occurrence of the next vacancy wars, Great Stanmore, Harrow-on-the-Hill, in the office .of Coroner for the ex- Harrow Weald, Kingsbury, Little Stanmore, isting Eastern Coroner's District or the Pinner, Wealdstone, Wembley; and that on existing Central Coroner's District of the occurrence of the next vacancy in the office the county of Middlesex, whichever of Coroner for the existing Eastern Coroner's shall first happen, the existing Eastern District
    [Show full text]
  • Leyton Jubilee Park I Marsh Lane Bridge Reconstruction
    http://mspweb.walthamforest.gov.uk/Planning/lg/GFPlanningDocumen... 1 0 JAN 2013 London Borough of Wnltham Forest Leyton Jubilee Park I Marsh Lane Bridge Reconstruction Flood Risl< Assessmen t Highways Mainlenance Group Euvirotunen(al Services LONDON SOUROUGH WALTBAM FOREST Low Hall Depol Argall Avenue Lcylon London E I07AS 1 of 1 23/02/2013 15:19 http://mspweb.walthamforest.gov.uk/Planning/lg/GFPlanningDocumen... ~·!}\( :~ ~ . DOCUMENT CONTROL SHEET Project Name Leyton Jubi ee Park I Marsh Lane Bridge Reconstruction Project TUie Rood Risk Assessment OS Map Rei 537076 E. 186955 N Location Le'yton E17 Orgamsat1on Contact Date Copms Waltham Forest A Prud'homme 24/12/12 1 1 of 1 23/02/2013 15:20 http://mspweb.walthamforest.gov.uk/Planning/lg/GFPlanningDocumen... Leyton Jubilee Park I Marsh Lane Bridge Reconstruction Flood Risk Assessment Contents 1.0 Executive Summary 1 2.0 Location 1 3.0 Geographical Area 1 4.0 Environmont Agency Requirement 2 5.0 Available Information 4 6.0 Flood Risk at Bridge Location 5 7.0 W alkover Survey 5 7.1 Habilats 5 7.2 Protected and Notable Species 5 7.3 Invasive Species 6 8.0 Topographical survey 6 9.0 Utilities Survey 6 10.0 Habitat Survey and Protectod Spoclos Assossment 6 11.0 Flood Risk Assessment, Footbridge Dovelopment and Constrain!$ 7 11.1 Flood Zone 7 11.2 Appropriate uses 7 11 .3 Dimensional Requirements of the Proposed Footbridge 7 11.4 Watercourse Reprofiling and Clearances 8 11.5 Flood Risk AsseSSI)lont and Mitigation 8 Appendices AppendiM A - Drawing No: A308·FRA·01 • Topographical Survey -Drawing No.
    [Show full text]
  • Lee Valley Regional Park Landscape Character Assessment
    LCT C: Urban Valley Floor with Marshlands SPA, which provides a nationally important habitat for overwintering birds. Cultural Influences 4.64 The low-lying land of rich alluvial deposits supported a system of grazing, referred to as the Lammas system5 from the Anglo-Saxon period to the end of the C19th. Grazing rights on the marshes were extinguished by the early C20th and a substantial proportion of the marshlands, with the exception of Walthamstow Marshes, were then modified by industrial activities and landfill, including the dumping of bomb rubble after WW2. In the 1950 and 60s the construction of flood relief channels ended the periodic inundation of the marshlands. 4.65 Communication routes through the valley floor proliferated over the C20th, including pylons, roads and railway lines mounted on embankments, but residential and industrial development remains largely confined to the margins. 4.66 Public access and recreation now characterises much of the marshlands, with some areas managed as nature reserves. However substantial infrastructure, such as the railway lines and flood relief channels and adjacent industrial development, means access through and into the marshes from surrounding urban areas is often severed. The tow-path following the River Lee Navigation provides a continuous link along the valley for visitors to enjoy the landscape. 5 A system of grazing whereby cattle was grazed only after the cutting and collection of hay Lee Valley Regional Park Landscape Strategy 85 April 2019 LCA C1: Rammey Marsh Lee Valley Regional Park Landscape Strategy 86 April 2019 LCA C1: Rammey Marsh Occasional long views out to wooded valley sides between Residential properties overlooking the southern area across the riverside vegetation.
    [Show full text]
  • Thameswater Tida L T Hames Defence Levels Preliminary Report on River Lee Flows and Levels
    ThamesWater Tida l T hames Defence Levels Preliminary Report on River Lee Flows and Levels August 1987 A R CHI VE : PLEA SE D O N OT DES TR O Y ThamesWater Tidal T ha mes Defe nce Levels Preliminary Report on River Lee Flows and Levels August 1987 Sir William Ha !crow & Partners Ltd Institute of Hydrology PREL IMINARY RIVER LEE ANALYSIS CONTENT S Page No GLOSSARY SUMMA RY 1. INTRODUCT ION 1 1.1 Objectives 1 1.2 The Lower River Lee Sys tem , 1 1.3 Da ta Availability 2 2 . DATA COLLECT ION 3 2.1 Tida l Wa ter Level Data 3 2 .2 Flood Da ta for the Lower Lee and Tribu taries 3 2 .3 Sub-catchment Area s 3 2 .4 Urban Area s 4 3 . TR END ANALYSES 5 3 .1 Water Leve l Trend s 5 3 .2 Flood Trend s 5 4 . FREQUENCY ANA LY SES OF T IDAL WATER LEVELS 6 4 .1 Frequen cy of Tida l Wa ter Leve ls 6 4 .2 Adj ustment to Lee Mouth 6 7 . FLOOD FREQUENC IES AT RIV ER GAUGING STAT IONS ON THE LOW ER LEE 7 5 .1 General Approach 7 5.2 Flood Frequencies Based on Data Ana lyses 7 5.3 Flood Frequencies Using FSR P rocedures 8 5.4 Propo sed Flood Frequenc ies for Ga uging Station s 9 6 . FLOOD FREQUENC IES IN LOW ER LEE CHA NNELS 10 6 .1 Flood Freq uencies in Lee Flood Relie f Channe l 10 6 .2 Flood Frequenc ies in Lee Nav iga tion Chan ne l 11 FIGURES 1.1 Diagramma tic Sys tem o f the Lower Lee 3.1 Flood Trends 4 .1 Concurren t Peak Water Leve ls at Brunsw ick Wha rf and Tow er P ier 5 .1 Feildes Weir Con current Flood s , Instan taneous and Mean Da ily 5.2 Flood Frequency Ana ly ses 5.3 G row th Fac to rs fo r Main Lee 5.4 G rowth Fac tors fo r Low er Lee Tributaries
    [Show full text]
  • List of Polling Stations May 2019 Harrow East
    LIST OF POLLING STATIONS MAY 2019 HARROW EAST Polling Situation of Polling Situation of Polling Situation of District Polling stations EDGWARE District Polling stations District Polling stations EA Edgware & District Ex-Service Men’s Club HARROW WEALD Burnt Oak Broadway, Edgware 1 EGA Blackwell Hall Uxbridge Road, Harrow Weald EAA Flash Musicals Youth Theatre (Near All Saints Church) 39,40 WOC Rayners Lane Baptist Church Methuen Road, Edgware 2 Imperial Drive, Rayners Lane EGB Cedars Children’s Centre (junction of Vicarage Way) 83 EAB Camrose Primary with Nursery Whittlesea Road (Entrance Opposite Chicheley St David's Drive, Edgware 3 Road, Harrow Weald 41,42 HEADSTONE NORTH KENTON WEST WR Pinner Park Junior School, EAC Stag Lane Nursery, Infant and Junior School EH St Mary's Church Melbourne Avenue. 84,85 Collier Drive, Edgware 4,5 Kenton Road, Harrow CANONS (Near junction of St. Leonards Ave) 43,44 WRA North Harrow Methodist Church EB St Lawrence Church Hall Pinner Road 86,87 EHA Kenton Library St. Lawrence Close, Edgware 6,7 Kenton Lane, Harrow WRB St. Alban's Church Hall (Junction of Christchurch Avenue) 45,46 EBA Aylward Primary School Norwood Drive, Harrow. 88,89 Pangbourne Drive, Stanmore 8,9 ROXETH EHB Priestmead Primary School (Salvatorian College) WS South Harrow Baptist Church Rooms, EBB Stanmore & Canons Park Synagogue Hartford Avenue, Harrow 47,48 Northolt Road, South Harrow. 90,91 London Road, Stanmore 10 WEALDSTONE EJ St Michael and All Angels Church WSA Earlsmead Primary School, EBC Canons Hall Bishop Ken Road, Harrow 49 Arundel Drive, Harrow. 92,93 Wemborough Road, Stanmore 11 KENTON EAST EJA Small Hall, Wealdstone Methodist Church EC Greek Community Hall Locket Road, Harrow 50,51 WSB PORTAKABIN Junction of The Heights & Gaylor Road Kenton Road, Harrow.
    [Show full text]
  • HIGH STREET, HARROW DRO/162 Page 1 Reference Description
    LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 1 HOLY TRINITY, WEALDSTONE: HIGH STREET, HARROW DRO/162 Reference Description Dates Parish Records PARISH REGISTERS DRO/162/001 Register of baptisms 1882 Feb- Not available for general access 1 volume 1902 Aug available online via www.ancestry.co.uk DRO/162/002 Register of baptisms 1902 Sep- Not available for general access 1 volume 1909 Sep available online via www.ancestry.co.uk DRO/162/003 Register of baptisms 1909 Sep- Not available for general access 1 volume 1914 Dec available online via www.ancestry.co.uk DRO/162/004 Register of baptisms 1915 Jan-1921 1 volume Mar DRO/162/005 Register of baptisms 1921 Mar- 1 volume 1926 Sep DRO/162/006 Register of baptisms 1926 Sep- 1 volume 1934 Jul DRO/162/007 Register of baptisms 1934 Jul-1942 1 volume Dec DRO/162/008 Register of baptisms 1942 Dec- 1 volume 1949 May DRO/162/009 Register of baptisms 1949 Jun-1953 1 volume Sep DRO/162/010 Register of baptisms 1953 Sep- 1 volume 1958 Oct DRO/162/011 Register of baptisms 1958 Nov- 1 volume 1965 Jun LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 2 HOLY TRINITY, WEALDSTONE: HIGH STREET, HARROW DRO/162 Reference Description Dates DRO/162/012 Register of marriages 1882 Aug- Not available for general access 1 volume 1903 Dec available online via www.ancestry.co.uk DRO/162/013 Register of marriages 1903 Dec- Not available for general access 1 volume 1913 Aug available online via www.ancestry.co.uk DRO/162/014 Register of marriages 1913 Aug- Not available for general access 1 volume 1920 Jan available online via www.ancestry.co.uk
    [Show full text]
  • FLEET TOWN V HANWELL TOWN SATURDAY 24Th FEBRUARY 2018 – 3.00 P.M the Evo-Stik League South East Today’S Game Is Sponsored By
    OFFICIAL DIGITAL PROGRAMME FLEET TOWN v HANWELL TOWN SATURDAY 24th FEBRUARY 2018 – 3.00 P.M The Evo-Stik League South East Today’s Game is Sponsored by Easi –Leaflets http://easi-leaflets.com Tel 07792 139386 Matt Bunyan MOM & Scorer of 5 goals on Tuesday Night in our 8-1 . North Hants Cup win. Fleet Town Squad 2017/18 SPONSORED BY WELCOME FROM OUR JOINT MANAGER ANDY HUNT Good afternoon and welcome to The Franki Foundation s Stadium the home of Fleet Town Football Club. Today we are in action against Hanwell Town F.C in the Evo-Stik South East Division. I would particularly like to offer a warm welcome to the Hanwell Town FC, officials, supporters and ground hoppers. I hope you have an enjoyable stay with us today and a safe journey home. Tuesday night saw us get our first win of 2018.It was a fantastic one over Tadley Calleva Reserves in the North Hampshire Cup. Winning 8-1 after going a goal behind ! Although there is obviously a huge difference in levels between the two sides you never know how these games can go. We started brightly and created four or five good chances but couldn’t get the vital first goal. Then after 10 or 15 minutes Tadley had their first attack which came down the right, a deep cross was met at the back post with a bullet header to start the scoring. We carried on playing well and really dominated the whole game as we should have done. It was good to see players scoring, Bunners with five goals, T (Toyosi) with a great strike, Horse (Chris Wales) continuing with his best scoring season in 20 years and Danilo coming off the bench to score a good goal.
    [Show full text]