DOCSLIB.ORG

AD06.02 Environmental Statement Volume 2 Appendices 11.1 to 11.3

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
AD06.02 Environmental Statement Volume 2 Appendices 11.1 to 11.3 NORTH LONDON WASTE AUTHORITY NORTH LONDON HEAT AND POWER PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT: VOLUME 2 APPENDICES 11.1 TO 11.3 AD06.02 NORTH LONDON WASTE AUTHORITY NORTH LONDON HEAT AND POWER PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT: VOLUME 2 APPENDIX 11.1 WATER RESOURCES AND FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY AD06.02 North London Waste Authority North London Heat and Power Project Environmental Statement Volume 2 Appendix 11.1 Water Resources and Flood Risk Assessment Methodology AD06.02 The Planning Act 2008 The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 Regulation 5 (2)(a) Issue October 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler E&I UK Ltd This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It does not in any way constitute advice to any third party who is able to access it by any means. Amec Foster Wheeler excludes to the fullest extent lawfully permitted all liability whatsoever for any loss or damage howsoever arising from reliance on the contents of this report. We do not however exclude our liability (if any) for personal injury or death resulting from our negligence, for fraud or any other matter in relation to which we cannot legally exclude liability. North London Waste Authority North London Heat and Power Project Environmental Statement Volume 2 Appendix 11.1 Water Resources and Flood Risk Assessment Methodology Contents Page 1 Water Resources and Flood Risk Assessment Methodology 2 1.1 Introduction 2 1.2 Engagement 2 1.3 Legislation and guidance 10 1.4 Baseline conditions 15 1.5 Construction and operational effects 16 1.6 Decommissioning effects 21 1.7 Cumulative effects 22 Issue | October 2015 | Amec Foster Wheeler E&I UK Ltd North London Waste Authority North London Heat and Power Project Environmental Statement Volume 2 Appendix 11.1 Water Resources and Flood Risk Assessment Methodology 1 Water Resources and Flood Risk Assessment Methodology 1.1 Introduction 1.1.1 This appendix sets out the methodology for assessing the likely significant effects of the Project on water resources (in terms of surface watercourses, groundwater flow, associated abstractions and discharges, water quality, designated sites, and wetland habitats) and flood risk. 1.1.2 This topic assesses effects on groundwater flows and quality as a result of activities at the ground surface, for example pollution of surface run-off. The Ground Conditions and Contamination section (Vol 2 Section 7) assess effects caused by changes to ground structure which could affect groundwater flow pathways and/or remobilise any existing ground contamination. 1.1.3 This appendix is divided into the following parts: a. engagement – describing a summary of comments included in the Scoping Opinion and through further stakeholder engagement and how these comments have been addressed; b. legislation and guidance – detailing requirements of the relevant National Policy Statements (NPS), how these have been addressed and additional guidance relevant to the assessment; c. methodology for establishing baseline conditions; and d. methodology for the assessment of construction, operation decommissioning and cumulative effects. 1.2 Engagement 1.2.1 Stakeholder engagement has taken place throughout the development of the design and environmental assessment. Vol 2 Appendix 7.1 provides a summary of the stakeholder engagement that has been undertaken in relation to groundwater, including comments on reports issued to the stakeholders and stakeholder consultation meetings. 1.2.2 A summary of water resources and flood risk specific engagement is provided in Vol 2 Appendix 11.1 Table 1. Vol 2 Appendix 11.1 Table 1: Water Resources and Flood Risk Technical Engagement and Scoping Responses No Organisation Comment Response (date) 1 Scoping Insufficient detail provided when: Further information regarding the Opinion: scoping out the potential effects surface water regime is provided in the Secretary of on water resources; and FRA (Vol 2 Appendix 11.2). State identifying that downstream These aspects have been scoped back (November in and are considered fully in this 2014) flow regimes would not be significantly affected by the assessment. Page 2 Issue | October 2015 | Amec Foster Wheeler E&I UK Ltd North London Waste Authority North London Heat and Power Project Environmental Statement Volume 2 Appendix 11.1 Water Resources and Flood Risk Assessment Methodology No Organisation Comment Response (date) proposed abstraction/discharge Air cooled condensers are proposed rates. as part of the Project. Two options for The proximity of sensitive the sourcing of water for these have receptors indicates the potential for been assessed as part of this ES. significant effects and there The proposed cooling water options remains the potential for water use will be discussed further with the EA. to exceed expected requirements or licensed limits. 2 Scoping Assessment required of potential The impact of climate change over the Opinion: groundwater pathway for discharge development lifetime has been Secretary of of liquids to surface and coastal considered within the FRA in line with State waters (including allowances for current guidance. (November climate change), including Contamination of groundwater (and re- 2014) engagement with the Environment mobilisation of ground contaminants) Agency (EA) to determine the has been addressed in Vol 2 Section 7 scope of the assessment as the (Ground Conditions and proposed development design Contamination). Climate change progresses. effects are considered within Vol 2 Section 11 (Water Resources and Flood Risk). Designs would be discussed with in the EA through ongoing engagement. The EA has been consulted in preparing the FRA (Vol 2 Appendix 11.2) and Hydrogeological Assessment (Vol 2 Appendix 7.2). 3 Scoping Full consideration required of the A comprehensive assessment of Opinion: potential effects of the cooling cooling water requirements, the Secretary of water connection on local intake/outfall locations, and the effect State hydrological and hydrogeological on the water environment has been (November resources. This will require: undertaken as part of this assessment. 2014) consultation with the Vol 2 Section 11 (Water Resources Environment Agency (EA) and Flood Risk) sets out details of regarding positioning of the proposed abstraction and discharge intake/outfall point; rates, including mains water, and the details of abstraction and outfall proposed intake and outfall points. rates to be defined and All three cooling water options have assessed; been considered in the assessment, and the options have been discussed agreement with the with the EA. Environment Agency (EA) that the rates are valid and the assessment represents the worst case; and the rate of mains water use to be clarified. 4 Scoping Flood Risk Assessment (FRA), The FRA forms an appendix to the ES Opinion: should form an appendix to the ES (Vol 2 Appendix 11.2) and is Secretary of and be cross referenced with other referenced in the discussion of flood State ES chapters. risk in the water resources (November assessment. 2014) 5 Scoping Should review River Basin WatFD requirements have been Response: Management Plan to determine considered in the water resources Page 3 Issue | October 2015 | Amec Foster Wheeler E&I UK Ltd North London Waste Authority North London Heat and Power Project Environmental Statement Volume 2 Appendix 11.1 Water Resources and Flood Risk Assessment Methodology No Organisation Comment Response (date) Secretary of how the Project can contribute to assessment. Consideration also given State, Water Framework Directive to the River Basin Management Plan Environment [WatFD] objectives. (RBMP) and the potential for the Agency Consideration required of the development to contribute to the (November requirements of the WatFD objectives. 2014) [WatFD]including causing no overall deterioration in water quality or the ecological status of any waterbody. 6 Scoping Flood risk and surface water A flood risk assessment for the Response: should be addressed in line with development has been prepared (Vol 2 Environment the requirements of the National Appendix 11.2). Agency Planning Policy Framework (November (NPPF) and the London Plan 2014) Policy 5.13. 7 Scoping Flood risk will need to be scoped These aspects have been scoped back Response: into the ES if works are proposed in and are considered fully in the water Environment to Enfield Ditch to ensure that any resources assessment. The impacts of Agency negative impact on people or the the Project on flood risk have been (November environment is avoided. assessed within the FRA and the ES 2014) (Vol 2 Section 11). 8 Scoping The FRA will need to consider the The FRA takes into consideration the Response: risk of fluvial flooding from the risks identified by the Greater London Greater nearby River Lee and Salmon’s Authority. The FRA is included as Vol London Brook systems, the risk of surface 2 Appendix 11.2. Authority water flooding and the risk of (January reservoir flooding from the range of 2015)1 raised reservoirs along the Lee Valley. 9 London Plan Policy 5.13 and the Sustainable Drainage Strategy has associated sustainable drainage been considered during design hierarchy should be applied to limit development. Surface water run-off surface water discharge to the would be limited as set out in the FRA, drainage system. Full in line with the London Plan and EA consideration required for guidance. rainwater harvesting systems. 10 Engagement Issues discussed at Environment Response: Agency (EA) consultation meeting Environment held on the 18 February 2015: Agency Consideration required of A Flood Risk Assessment (FRA) has (February desire to widen the entrance to been undertaken (Vol 2 Appendix 2015) the Edmonton EcoPark from 11.2) and considers the proposed Advent Way and the entrance works to the bridges. to the wharf area and to create Consideration of the requirements of a new crossing across Enfield the Water Framework Directive Ditch from Lee Park Way that (WatFD) within the Water Resources would contradict Water and Flood Risk assessment includes Framework Directive consideration of the new crossing and requirement for culverts to be entrance widening.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HA16 Rivers and Streams London's Rivers and Streams Resource
    HA16 Rivers and Streams Definition All free-flowing watercourses above the tidal limit London’s rivers and streams resource The total length of watercourses (not including those with a tidal influence) are provided in table 1a and 1b. These figures are based on catchment areas and do not include all watercourses or small watercourses such as drainage ditches. Table 1a: Catchment area and length of fresh water rivers and streams in SE London Watercourse name Length (km) Catchment area (km2) Hogsmill 9.9 73 Surbiton stream 6.0 Bonesgate stream 5.0 Horton stream 5.3 Greens lane stream 1.8 Ewel court stream 2.7 Hogsmill stream 0.5 Beverley Brook 14.3 64 Kingsmere stream 3.1 Penponds overflow 1.3 Queensmere stream 2.4 Keswick avenue ditch 1.2 Cannizaro park stream 1.7 Coombe Brook 1 Pyl Brook 5.3 East Pyl Brook 3.9 old pyl ditch 0.7 Merton ditch culvert 4.3 Grand drive ditch 0.5 Wandle 26.7 202 Wimbledon park stream 1.6 Railway ditch 1.1 Summerstown ditch 2.2 Graveney/ Norbury brook 9.5 Figgs marsh ditch 3.6 Bunces ditch 1.2 Pickle ditch 0.9 Morden Hall loop 2.5 Beddington corner branch 0.7 Beddington effluent ditch 1.6 Oily ditch 3.9 Cemetery ditch 2.8 Therapia ditch 0.9 Micham road new culvert 2.1 Station farm ditch 0.7 Ravenbourne 17.4 180 Quaggy (kyd Brook) 5.6 Quaggy hither green 1 Grove park ditch 0.5 Milk street ditch 0.3 Ravensbourne honor oak 1.9 Pool river 5.1 Chaffinch Brook 4.4 Spring Brook 1.6 The Beck 7.8 St James stream 2.8 Nursery stream 3.3 Konstamm ditch 0.4 River Cray 12.6 45 River Shuttle 6.4 Wincham Stream 5.6 Marsh Dykes
    [Show full text]
  • London National Park City Week 2018
    London National Park City Week 2018 Saturday 21 July – Sunday 29 July www.london.gov.uk/national-park-city-week Share your experiences using #NationalParkCity SATURDAY JULY 21 All day events InspiralLondon DayNight Trail Relay, 12 am – 12am Theme: Arts in Parks Meet at Kings Cross Square - Spindle Sculpture by Henry Moore - Start of InspiralLondon Metropolitan Trail, N1C 4DE (at midnight or join us along the route) Come and experience London as a National Park City day and night at this relay walk of InspiralLondon Metropolitan Trail. Join a team of artists and inspirallers as they walk non-stop for 48 hours to cover the first six parts of this 36- section walk. There are designated points where you can pick up the trail, with walks from one mile to eight miles plus. Visit InspiralLondon to find out more. The Crofton Park Railway Garden Sensory-Learning Themed Garden, 10am- 5:30pm Theme: Look & learn Crofton Park Railway Garden, Marnock Road, SE4 1AZ The railway garden opens its doors to showcase its plans for creating a 'sensory-learning' themed garden. Drop in at any time on the day to explore the garden, the landscaping plans, the various stalls or join one of the workshops. Free event, just turn up. Find out more on Crofton Park Railway Garden Brockley Tree Peaks Trail, 10am - 5:30pm Theme: Day walk & talk Crofton Park Railway Garden, Marnock Road, London, SE4 1AZ Collect your map and discount voucher before heading off to explore the wider Brockley area along a five-mile circular walk. The route will take you through the valley of the River Ravensbourne at Ladywell Fields and to the peaks of Blythe Hill Fields, Hilly Fields, One Tree Hill for the best views across London! You’ll find loads of great places to enjoy food and drink along the way and independent shops to explore (with some offering ten per cent for visitors on the day with your voucher).
    [Show full text]
  • Rye Meads Water Cycle Study\F-Reports\Phase 3\5003-Bm01390-Bmr-18 Water Cycle Strategy Final Report.Doc
    STEVENAGE BOROUGH COUNCIL RYE MEADS WATER CYCLE STRATEGY DETAILED STUDY REPORT FINAL REPORT Hyder Consulting (UK) Limited 2212959 Aston Cross Business Village 50Rocky Lane Aston Birmingham B6 5RQ United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0)870 000 3007 Fax: +44 (0)870 000 3907 www.hyderconsulting.com STEVENAGE BOROUGH COUNCIL RYE MEADS WATER CYCLE STRATEGY DETAILED STUDY REPORT FINAL REPORT James Latham/ Dan Author Vogtlin Checker Renuka Gunasekara Approver Mike Irwin Report No 5003-BM01390-BMR-18-Water Cycle Strategy Final Report Date 5th October 2009 This report has been prepared for STEVENAGE BOROUGH COUNCIL in accordance with the terms and conditions of appointment for WATER CYCLE STRATEGY dated April 2008. Hyder Consulting (UK) Limited (2212959) cannot accept any responsibility for any use of or reliance on the contents of this report by any third party. RYE MEADS WATER CYCLE STRATEGY—DETAILED STUDY REPORT Hyder Consulting (UK) Limited-2212959 k:\bm01390- rye meads water cycle study\f-reports\phase 3\5003-bm01390-bmr-18 water cycle strategy final report.doc Revisions Prepared Approved Revision Date Description By By - 2/10/2008 Draft Report Structure JL 1 18/11/2008 First Report Draft JL/DV MI 2 27/01/2009 Draft Report JL/DV MI 3-13 03/04/2009 Final Draft Report as amended by stakeholder comments JL/DV RG 14 09/07/2009 Final Draft Report JL/DV RG 15 10/07/2009 Final Draft Report Redacted JL/DV RG 16 21/08/2009 Final Draft Report JL/DV RG 17 21/09/2009 Final Draft following core project team meeting comments JL/DV RG 18 05/10/2009 Final Report JL/DV MI RYE MEADS WATER CYCLE STRATEGY—DETAILED STUDY REPORT Hyder Consulting (UK) Ltd-2212959 k:\bm01390- rye meads water cycle study\f-reports\phase 3\5003-bm01390-bmr-18 water cycle strategy final report.doc CONTENTS 1 Introduction and Summary of Key Outcomes ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • THE LONDON GAZETTE, 9Ra MAY 1975 6069
    THE LONDON GAZETTE, 9ra MAY 1975 6069 This application is to replace previous Permit No. posed scheme of artificial recharge of the ground-water 28/39/303120 For the same amount of abstraction. in the Lower Lee. Further details of the application are: in the Parish of A copy of the draft licence and of the plans deposited Chertsey, above. with if may be inspected free of charge at the office of the A copy of the application and of any map, plan or Solicitor to the Authority at Brettenham House (Third other document submitted with it may be inspected free Floor), Lancaster Place, London, WC2E 7EN, and at the of charge at Anningsley Park Farm Office at all reasonable office of the Divisional Manager, Lea Division, " The hours during the period beginning on 1st May 1975, and Grange", Crossbrook Street, Waltham Cross, Hertford- ending oh 5th June 1975. shire, EN8 8LX, at all reasonable hours during the period Any person who wishes to make representations about beginning 9th May 1975 and ending on 13th June 1975. the application should do so in writing to the Divisional Any person wishing to make representations about the Manager, Thames Conservancy Division, Thames Water draft licence should do so in writing to the Solicitor to Authority, Nugent House, Vastem Road, Reading, RG1 the Authority at Brettenham House, Lancaster Place, 9DB, before the end of the said period. London, WC2E 7EN, before the end of the said period. E. R. Hayes, on behalf of Mr. W. M. Vernon. After the expiry of the said period the Authority will be entitled to pass a resolution by virtue of which a 28th April 1975.
    [Show full text]
  • LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 1 BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD
    LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 1 BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD ACC/2423 Reference Description Dates LEE CONSERVANCY BOARD ENGINEER'S OFFICE Engineers' reports and letter books LEE CONSERVANCY BOARD: ENGINEER'S REPORTS ACC/2423/001 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1881 Jan-1883 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/002 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1884 Jan-1886 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/003 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1887 Jan-1889 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/004 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1890 Jan-1893 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/005 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1894 Jan-1896 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/006 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1897 Jan-1899 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/007 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1903 Jan-1903 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/008 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1904 Jan-1904 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/009 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1905 Jan-1905 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/010 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1906 Jan-1906 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 2 BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD ACC/2423 Reference Description Dates ACC/2423/011 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1908 Jan-1908 Lea navigation/ stort navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/012 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1912 Jan-1912 Lea navigation/ stort navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/013 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1913 Jan-1913 Lea navigation/ stort navigation
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water Management Plan London Borough Of
    SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN DRAIN LONDON LONDON BOROUGH OF ENFIELD FINAL DRAFT v2.0 Quality Management Quality Management DOCUMENT INFORMATION Title: Surface Water Management Plan for London Borough of Enfield Owner: Ian Russell Version: v3.0 Status: Final Project Number: CS/046913 File Name: DLT2_GP4_Enfield_SWMP Final_V3.0 REVISION HISTORY Date of Summary of Changes Completed By Version Issue Initial draft SI 12/06/2011 1.0 Final Draft SI 01/08/2011 2.0 Final IR 05/01/2012 3.0 AUTHOR Name Organisation and Role Stephanie Ip Senior Consultant, Capita Symonds Ruth Farrar Consultant, Capita Symonds APPROVALS Name Title Signature Date Ruth Goodall Director, Capita Symonds Principal Consultant, Capita Michael Arthur Symonds Ian Russell Senior Engineer, LB Enfield Kevin Reid Programme Manager DISTRIBUTION Name Organisation and Role Ian Russell Senior Engineer, LB Enfield Kevin Reid Programme Manager, GLA RELATED DOCUMENTS Date of Doc Ref Document Title Author Version Issue i Acknowledgements Acknowledgements A number of people and organisations outside Enfield Council have contributed to this Surface Water Management Plan. Their assistance is greatly appreciated, and in particularly inputs and information provided by: • The British Geological Survey • British Waterways • Drain London Group 4 boroughs: o London Borough of Haringey o London Borough of Hackney o London Borough of Waltham Forest o London Borough of Newham o London Borough of Tower Hamlets • The Environment Agency • The Greater London Authority • London Councils • The London Fire Brigade • Network Rail • Thames Water • Transport for London and London Underground ii Executive Summary Executive Summary This document forms the Surface Water Management Plan (SWMP) for the London Borough (LB) of Enfield.
    [Show full text]
  • The Navigation of the River Lee (1190 – 1790)
    Edmonton Hundred Historical Society Occasional Paper New Series No. 36 by J.G.L.Burnby and M.Parker. Published 1978 Added to the site by kind permission of Mr Michael Parker THE NAVIGATION OF THE RIVER LEE (1190 – 1790) PREFACE As the men of the river frequently pointed out the Lee is one of the "great rivers of the realm", and it is only fitting that its history should be traced; indeed it is surprising that the task has not been carried out far earlier than this. Regretfully the story of its busiest period in the days of post-canalisation has had to be left to another, later Occasional Paper. The spelling of the name of the river has varied over the centuries. In 1190 it was referred to as "the water of Lin", in the fourteenth century as "La Leye", the cartographer Saxton seems to have been the first to introduce "Lea" to map-makers in 1576, in the eighteenth century it was not infrequently called the "Ware River" but the commonest spelling would seem to be "Lee" and it is to this which we have decided to adhere. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We would like to thank the London Borough of Haringey Libraries panel for their financial assistance in the publication of this paper. Our gratitude also goes to the Marquess of Salisbury for granting permission to reproduce the maps held in the Hatfield House Collection. A number of people have most generously helped us in the production of this paper. Mrs.H.Baker has with her usual expertise drawn the map of the lower reaches of the river, and Mr.Neil Clements is responsible for the charming reproductions of the prints of the Powder Mill at Waltham Abbey and the river at Ware.
    [Show full text]
  • Brent Valley & Barnet Plateau Area Framework All London Green Grid
    All Brent Valley & Barnet Plateau London Area Framework Green Grid 11 DRAFT Contents 1 Foreword and Introduction 2 All London Green Grid Vision and Methodology 3 ALGG Framework Plan 4 ALGG Area Frameworks 5 ALGG Governance 6 Area Strategy 9 Area Description 10 Strategic Context 11 Vision 14 Objectives 16 Opportunities 20 Project Identification 22 Clusters 24 Projects Map 28 Rolling Projects List 34 Phase One Early Delivery 36 Project Details 48 Forward Strategy 50 Gap Analysis 51 Recommendations 52 Appendices 54 Baseline Description 56 ALGG SPG Chapter 5 GGA11 Links 58 Group Membership Note: This area framework should be read in tandem with All London Green Grid SPG Chapter 5 for GGA11 which contains statements in respect of Area Description, Strategic Corridors, Links and Opportunities. The ALGG SPG document is guidance that is supplementary to London Plan policies. While it does not have the same formal development plan status as these policies, it has been formally adopted by the Mayor as supplementary guidance under his powers under the Greater London Authority Act 1999 (as amended). Adoption followed a period of public consultation, and a summary of the comments received and the responses of the Mayor to those comments is available on the Greater London Authority website. It will therefore be a material consideration in drawing up development plan documents and in taking planning decisions. The All London Green Grid SPG was developed in parallel with the area frameworks it can be found at the following link: http://www.london.gov.uk/publication/all-london- green-grid-spg . Cover Image: View across Silver Jubilee Park to the Brent Reservoir Foreword 1 Introduction – All London Green Grid Vision and Methodology Introduction Area Frameworks Partnership - Working The various and unique landscapes of London are Area Frameworks help to support the delivery of Strong and open working relationships with many recognised as an asset that can reinforce character, the All London Green Grid objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1 Draft Greenspace Capital Investment Strategy , Item 14
    Environment Committee: 08 November 2016 Implementation of the Parks and Open Spaces Strategy Appendix 1: Draft Greenspaces Capital Investment Programme The proposed Greenspaces Capital Investment Programme amounts to £105m over a 5-10 year period (transformational schemes will have longer timescales due to funding, e.g. Brent Cross and Heritage Parks projects), detailed throughout this document. This is proposed to be delivered through a split of 56% developer funding, 22% grant funding and 22% LBB Capital Funding (mainly borrowing), and meaning that 78% of the total cost of the programme is to be funded through external sources of funding. The table shows the proposed approach to investment in open spaces to maximise the strategic benefit and funding opportunity from Council investment through both the development reserve and other capital funding (mostly borrowing, but some specific capital receipts). In most cases borrowing proposals have been linked to assets such as pavilions or roads/footpaths, but in a few places the shift towards ‘Natural Capital Accounting’ adopted through the Open Spaces Strategy may need to be utilised to support proposed borrowing. Site Description/Comments Total cost S106 Dev. Grants LBB Reserve Capital Existing Capital Colindale Parks (Transformational 12,000,000 150,000 8,350,000 3,500,000 0 Programme Investment) Targeted Small Scale Investments 622,000 189,000 0 18,000 415,000 SUB -TOTAL 12,622,000 339,000 8,350,000 3,518,000 415,000 Proposed 15,115,00 Regeneration and Growth Areas 36,800,000 6,900,000 9,110,000 5,675,000 ‘Transformationa 0 l’ Capital Development Areas 8,500,000 7,800,000 600,000 100,000 0 Investments Sports Hubs 14,450,000 3,950,000 4,950,000 2,300,000 3,250,000 Heritage Parks 10,973,000 0 2,070,000 5,175,000 3,728,000 26,865,00 14,520,00 16,685,00 12,653,00 SUB-TOTAL 70,723,000 0 0 0 0 Site Description/Comments Total cost S106 Dev.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Schedule of Post-Submission Proposed Modifications
    North London Waste Plan Complete Schedule of Proposed Modifications March 2021 North London Waste Plan North London Waste Plan: Proposed Modifications (March 2021) Main and Additional Modifications to the Proposed Submission North London Waste Plan combining all modifications made after the submission of the Plan on 8th August 2019. Main Modifications (MM) which have a reference number and relate to issues of soundness Additional Modifications (AM) which are minor in nature and which provide consistency, clarity and/or correct errors New text in bold Deleted text strikethrough Where paragraphs have been moved, this is indicated in both their original place (greyed out) and in their new location with any subsequent changes Reference Section Further modification Justificati on AM All Changes to Table and Figure numbering Contribute s to Table Proposed Table Revised through Figure Proposed Figure Revised consistenc Submission + MM Submission + through MM y, clarity Table 1: NLWP Deleted Figure 1: North Figure 1: North and/or Timetable London Plan Area London Plan Area correct Table 2: Amount of Table 1: Amount of Figure 2: Documents Figure 2: Documents errors Waste Generated in Waste Generated in making up the making up the North London, 2016 North London, 2016 Development Plan for Development Plan for North London North London Boroughs Boroughs Table 4: Waste Table 2: The amount Figure 3: Hierarchy of Figure 3: Hierarchy of exported from North of North London’s Planning Guidance Planning Guidance London 2011-2016 waste managed in Policies
    [Show full text]
  • London Borough of Waltham Forest Level 1 SFRA
    London Borough of Waltham Forest Level 1 SFRA Final Report Project number: 60577135 October 2018 London Borough of Waltham Forest Level 1 SFRA FINAL Project number: 60577135 Quality information Prepared by Checked by Approved by Hannah Booth Emily Craven Sarah Kelly Graduate Water Associate Director, Water Regional Director, Water Consultant Sarah Waite Hydrologist Consultant Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorized Name Position 01 July 2018 Draft Report for 26 July 2018 Sarah Kelly Regional Director, client comment Water 02 August 2018 Final report 02 October 2018 Sarah Kelly Regional Director, Water AECOM i London Borough of Waltham Forest Level 1 SFRA FINAL Project number: 60577135 Prepared for: London Borough of Waltham Forest Council Prepared by: AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Ltd Midpoint, Alencon Link Basingstoke Hampshire RG21 7PP United Kingdom T: +44(0)1256 310200 aecom.com © 2018 AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Ltd. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Ltd (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. AECOM ii London Borough of Waltham
    [Show full text]
  • Salmons Brook Healthy River Challenge: the Start-Up Performance of Three Constructed Wetlands at Improving Water Quality
    Salmons Brook Healthy River Challenge: The start-up performance of three constructed wetlands at improving water quality. Water sampling, analysis and report by Dr. Nathalie Gilbert, Thames21. May 2016 Executive Summary This report assesses the start-up performance of three constructed wetlands at improving water quality in the period immediately after construction and planting. The systems were located in the catchment of the Salmons Brook, a tributary of the River Lea, in Enfield north London and consisted of: i) an integrated wetland (Glenbrook), ii) an infiltration basin (Grovelands Park) and a reedbed (Grovelands Park). Water quality was investigated by a twice-monthly regime of water sampling (April – November), laboratory testing and statistical analysis of concentrations of nutrients (total nitrogen, ammonia, nitrate, phosphate), heavy metals (copper, zinc, lead, cadmium) and coliform bacteria. Additionally, on three occasions each of the six basins of the integrated wetland were sampled in order to assess the performance of each basin at improving water quality. Results indicated that all three constructed wetlands were all highly effective at removing nitrogen compounds and coliform bacteria. Statistically significant differences in these parameters were reported, with average reductions between the inflow and outflow to the system of up to 67% of ammonia, 68% of nitrate, and 55% of total nitrogen. According to EU bathing water standards (the only standards available for this parameter, but not applicable to non-designated bathing water areas), classification improved from poor (imperative) at the system inflows to good at the outflows. During all but the highest flows, the infiltration basin (Grovelands Park) captured all polluted water and allowed it to slowly filter into the ground, indicating almost total effectiveness in preventing all pollutants from entering the Salmons Brook.
    [Show full text]