DOCSLIB.ORG

Before, During and After the Pride Parade

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Before, During and After the Pride Parade LGBTIQ RIGHTS IN MEDIA - BEFORE, DURING AND AFTER THE PRIDE PARADE Media ,onitoring 21 August – 22 September 2019 METODOLOGY Monitoring includes both qualitative and quantitative research: • Number of media announcements about the LGBTIQ community (by media type and per media individually) • Number of announcements compared to subjects talking about a topic • Planning of announcements • Number of announcements in different tones • Number of announcements in relation to predefined topics • Number of announcements that have identified use of inadequate terminology or derogatory names • Number of announcements relative to gender of interviewee • Relation between LGBTIQ Community information and other information contained in the observed announcements (FOCUS) • Selected announcements position (VISIBILITY) Observation period : 21 August – 22 September 2019 15 media were monitored: • Televisions: TVCG1, TV Vijesti, TV Prva - the main central-informative show (Dnevnik 2, Vijesti u pola 7, Žurnal) • Daily Newspaper: Vijesti, Dan, Pobjeda, Dnevne novine and Večernje novosti • Portals: Vijesti, CdM, Analitika, Antena M, RTCG, IN4S and FOS media NUMBER OF ANNOUNCEMENTS ABOUT THE TOPIC The total number of announcements related to the LGBTIQ community in all three types of monitored media was 270 posts, with most of them on portals 67% (on average, 6 posts were posted on portals daily) and the least in television content (9%) 200 181 180 160 9% 140 120 24% 100 80 65 67% 60 40 24 20 0 Televisions Print media Internet Televisions Print media Internet NUMBER OF ANNOUNCEMENTS PER MEDIA INDIVIDUALLY The most announcements on this topic were on the Vijesti portal (13% of the total corpus), Pobjeda and TV Vijesti, and the least in Večernje novosti, on TV Prva and IN4S. 36 32 26 26 25 24 17 18 14 11 12 8 9 5 7 ND Vijesti Pobjeda Dnevne Dan Večernje RTCG TV Prva Vijesti TV FOS IN4S AntenaM Analitika Portal CDM Portal Novine novosti Media RTCG Vijesti TREND OF ANNOUNCEMENTS Most announcements were made on 20 and 21 September 2019 (Pride Parade), and at least on the first monitoring day (21 August). The topic also gained significant publicity on 31 August (assault on a transgender person in Kolašin). VALUE CONTEXT – TONE OF THE ANNOUNCEMENTS In the observed period, media and other entities had predominantly neutral approach when presenting information regarding members of the LGBTIQ community. Of total amount of announcement, 40% are affirmative, while 7% are negative about the LGBTIQ community. Positive Negative Neutral 40% 144 107 53% 19 Positive Neutral Negative 7% VALUE CONTEXT – TONE OF THE ANNOUNCEMENTS PER MEDIA INDIVIDUALLY The most positive announcements were on Antena M and Vijesti portals, and the most negative at the IN4S portal. Viewed individually per media, the highest percentage of negative ones compared to the total number of published posts was found on IN4S portal (67%), positive on public broadcaster RTCG (62%), and neutral in the daily newspaper Vijesti (76.47%). There was no negative publicity in the television content. POS NEU NEG 21 17 16 15 14 14 13 12 1212 12 11 8 8 8 8 8 7 6 5 5 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ND Pobjeda Dnevne Dan Večernje RTCG TV Prva Vijesti FOS IN4S AntenaM Analitika Portal CDM Portal Vijesti Novine novosti TV Media RTCG Vijesti INSTITUTUONS’ STANCE/POSITION Members of the LGBTIQ community were mostly mentioned by NGOs that primarily deal with this community issues (109 posts). They are followed by the state authorities and other state institutions (51 publications) and individuals (45 publications). Planned outbursts of NGOs primarily addressing the LGBTIQ community issues had a 43.33% share. The media initiative was spotted in 12 publications (4% of the total corpus), most of them on Vijesti portal (5) and in daily paper Vijesti (3). 40% Planned outbursts Unplanned mentions 19% 17% 43% 57% 0% 5% 5% 7% 4% 3% State bodies and National Local self- NGOs primarily Other NGO International Political parties Individuals Media initiative other state coordinator for government dealing with the community institutions implementation LGBTIQ of LGBTIQ community rights policies INSTITUTIONS’ POSITION – TONE OF THE POSTS In a negative context, the topic was mostly discussed by individuals and members of particular political parties. The position of state bodies and other state institutions, as well as local self-governments, is dominated by neutral mentions. When it comes to unplanned mentions of the LGBTIQ community, men appeared in 74% of the interviewees, and women in 24% posts. Men Women POS NEU NEG 64 26% 45 33 30 18 74% 14 8 11 12 7 7 7 6 0 5 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 State bodies and National Local self- NGOs primarily Other NGOs International Political parties Individuals Media initiative other state coordinator for government dealing with the community institutions implementation LGBTIQ of LGBTIQ community rights policies THEMATIC REVIEW OF ANNOUNCEMENTS Promotional activities (Pride Parade and other events), as well as specific cases of violence, are the most represented topics in the total thematic corpus with 41%, i.e. 27% share. Other important topics for the LGBTIQ community, such as legal framework, employment and similar, were hardly discussed. Legal framework 0% Other 12% Other 31 Same-sex unions Same-sex unions 13 5% Promotional activities Violence (concrete cases) 74 (Pride Parade and other manifestations) Attitude of institutions and individuals towards 41% LGBTIQ 36 Violence (concrete cases) Health care system 5 27% Employment 0 Promotional activities (Pride Parade and other 110 manifestations) Employment Attitude of 0% Legal framework 1 institutions and individuals towards Health care system LGBTIQ 2% 13% *Although questions were raised before and during the Pride Parade about the life partnership of persons of the same sex, the issue of legislation, as well as the attitude of institutions and individuals towards the LGBTIQ community, all of these topics were addressed sporadically and covered by the theme: Promotional Activities, as the aim is to examine how much other topics were presented in the period before the Parade. FOCUS and VISIBILITY - the ratio/relationship between LGBTIQ community information and other information When the media report on the LGBTIQ community, these topics then appear in the majority of cases as primary (64% of the posts deal with the LGBTIQ community entirely or mostly). With the highest number of announcements (79%), the topic was in the most visible position - in the header. FOCUS 11% VISIBILITY 20% 1% 25% 64% 79% 214 212 4 54 42 14 Primary Secondary Tertiary Header First 20% of the post The rest THE USE OF INADEQUATE TERMINOLOGY OR DEROGATORY NAMES In 7 announcements, use of inadequate terminology or derogatory names was noted, of which the use of inadequate terminology was recorded in 5 publications, and the use of derogatory names in 2 cases. Inadequate terminology Derogatory names 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ND Vijesti Pobjeda Dnevne Dan Večernje TVCG 1 TV Prva Vijesti TV FOS IN4S AntenaM Analitika Portal CDM Portal Novine novosti Media RTCG Vijesti *Inadequate terminology mainly referred to the use of sexual preference or commitment instead of sexual orientation, or the terminology typical for the members of the LGBTIQ community was put in a different context (describing others), while derogatory names included the mention of term fagots and derivatives. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • “MLADOST” BIJELA This Analysis Was Carried out in March 2014 F
    ANALYSIS OF MEDIA REPORTING ON CHILDREN IN CHLDREN’S HOME “MLADOST” BIJELA This analysis was carried out in March 2014 for the Ministry of Labour and Social Welfare of Montenegro and UNICEF by Ms. Zdenka Jagarinec, Slovenian journalist and editor with more than 20 years of experience, and Mr. Ugljesa Jankovic teaching assistant at the Faculty of Political Science in Podgorica. The analysis and assessment of media reporting on children in the Children’s Home “Mladost” in Bijela was made based on 207 media reports published in Montenegro in the period between1st December 2013 and 31st January 2014. The analysis covered media releases from six daily newspapers – Dnevne novine, Vijesti, Pobjeda, Dan, Večernje novosti and Blic, one weekly magazine - Monitor, three portals – Cafe del Montenegro, Portal Analitika and Bankar.me, and four TV agencies – TVCG, TV Prva, TV Vijesti and TV Pink. The names of media agencies and donors/visitors to “Mladost” in the context of specific media reports have been removed from the text. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ANALYSIS OF MEDIA EXPOSURE OF CHILDREN IN THE CHILDREN’S 3 HOME “MLADOST”, BIJELA I. Statistical analysis of media reporting about children from the Children’s Home 3 “Mladost”, Bijela II. Analysis of media reporting from the aspect of rights of the child 6 III. The context of media reports about children from the Children’s Home 10 “Mladost”, Bijela CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 ANNEXES 17 Annex I: Excerpts from Laws, Documents and Guidelines 17 Annex II: Case study Kolasin 21 Annex III: Examples of reporting about children in Slovenia 23 2 ANALYSIS OF MEDIA EXPOSURE OF CHILDREN IN THE CHILDREN’S HOME “MLADOST”, BIJELA Media have an important impact on the social position of children.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring-Medija-35Mm.Pdf
    MONITORING MEDIJA SADRŽAJ ZAKONSKI OKVIR ..................................................................................................................................................................3 METODOLOGIJA ....................................................................................................................................................................6 NAJZNAČAJNIJI NALAZI ISTRAŽIVANJA ..........................................................................................................................7 Novinski prostor posvećen djeci/mladima ..............................................................................................................................7 Dubina obrađenih tema koje se tiču djece/mladih................................................................................................................9 Objektivnost izvještavanja o djeci/mladima..........................................................................................................................10 Senzacionalizam u izvještavanju o djeci/mladima..............................................................................................................12 Teme koje se tiču djece/mladih ..................................................................................................................................................16 Fotografije u izvještavanju o djeci/mladima..........................................................................................................................16 Pravo na privatnost
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of the National Integrity System of Montenegro
    ASSESSMENT OF THE NATIONAL INTEGRITY SYSTEM OF MONTENEGRO This project is supported by the European Union. The content of this does not reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Responsibility for the information and views expressed in the report lies entirely with the author ASSESSMENT OF THE NATIONAL INTEGRITY SYSTEM OF MONTENEGRO Title: ASSESSMENT OF THE NATIONAL INTEGRITY SYSTEM OF MONTENEGRO Publisher: Network for affirmation of NGO sector - MANS Monitoring and Analytic Programme Authors: Vanja Ćalović, Executive Director Vuk Maraš, Monitoring and Analytic Programme Director Aleksandar Maškovic, Analytic Programme Coordinator Veselin Radulovic, MANS’ Legal Advisor Print: 3M - Makarije Edition: 30 copies Contact: Dalmatinska 188, Podgorica, Montenegro Phone: +382 20 266 326 Fax: +382 20 266 328 E-mail: [email protected] www.mans.co.me CONTENTS I INTRODUCTORY NOTE ........................................................................................................................... 7 II EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 11 III ABOUT THE NATIONAL INTEGRITY SYSTEM ASSESMENT .............................................. 21 IV COUNTRY PROFILE OF MONTENEGRO ..................................................................................... 27 V CORRUPTION PROFILE ......................................................................................................................... 31 VI ANTI-CORRUPTION ACTIVITIES .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wus Austria Podgorica Office Media Report 2008
    WUS AUSTRIA PODGORICA OFFICE MEDIA REPORT 2008 16.12.2008 Life is beautiful (TV ATLAS) Sep. 2008 Studentski magazin "Tribune" - Organizacija WUS Austria i Univerzitet Crne Gore nastavljaju dosadašnju uspješnu saradnju , "Konkretizacija dogovorenih projekata" English translation: Student magazine "Tribune" - Organisation WUS Austria and the University of Montenegro continue successful cooperation, "Concrete realization of agreed projects" May 2008 Studentski magazin "Tribune" - Nevladina organizacija WUS Austria je ponudila mogućnost studentima da teorijska znanja primijene praktično, "Završeno studentsko takmičenje Montenegro Case Challenge" English translation: Student magazine "Tribune" – Non-governmental organisation WUS Austria offered students the possibility to put their theoretical knowledge into practice, "Student Competition Montenegro Case Challenge Completed" Studentski časopis "Projectis" - Razgovarali smo sa Stefanom Aleksićem, članom studentske organizacije "Proprojectis" i studentom druge godine ekonomije "Studenti - glavna pokretačka snaga" English translation: Student magazine "Projectis" - We spoke with Stefan Aleksic, member of the student organisation "Proprojectis" and student of the second year at the Faculty of Economics "Students – the main driving force" 14.05.2008 Dnevne novine "Dan" - Promovisana knjiga o demokratiji u istočnoj i centralnoj Evropi "Srbija samo promijenila vladara" English translation: Daily Newspaper "Dan" - Book on democracy in Eastern and Central Europe promoted "Serbia only changed the ruling
    [Show full text]
  • Analiza Primjene Programskih Standarda
    Crna Gora AGENCIJA ZA ELEKTRONSKE MEDIJE ANALIZA PRIMJENE PROGRAMSKIH STANDARDA - IZABRANE KOMERCIJALNE TV STANICE U CRNOJ GORI - Podgorica, maj 2012. godine SADRŽAJ: I UVOD………….………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 3 II KVANTITATIVNI POKAZATELJI……………………………………………………………………………. 4 III SUMARNI POKAZATELJI …………………………………………………………………………….….…. 18 2 I UVOD Ova analiza urañena je na osnovu podataka dobijenih monitoringom emitovanih programskih sadržaja osam komercijalnih TV emitera opšteg televizijskog programa u Crnoj Gori: TV Atlas, TV Vijesti, TV Elmag, TV IN, TV MBC, NTV Montena, TV Pink M i TV Prva. Riječ je, takoñe, o TV stanicama koje su, shodno članu 71 tačka 1 Zakona o elektronskim medijima, u statusu “nacionalnog komercijalnog emitera” (budući da pokrivaju najmanje 75 odsto stanovništa u najmanje 10 jedinica lokalne samouprave). Predmet pažnje bila je primjena programskih standarda sadržanih u Zakonu o elektronskim medijima Crne Gore i pravilnicima Agencije za elektronske medije, i to: 1. Procenat sopstvene produkcije u odnosu na ukupni emitovani program (Član 11. Pravilnika o uslovima za odreñivanje programskih sadržaja koji se smatraju sopstvenom produkcijom /"Sl.list Crne Gore, br.48/11"/ kojim je propisano da je emiter opšteg televizijskog programa dužan da obezbijedi da programi u sopstvenoj produkciji čine najmanje 10% mjesečnog vremena emitovanja). 2. Trajanje i struktura emitovanog informativnog programa (Član 59 stav 5 Zakona o elektronskim medijima /"Sl.list CG", br. 46/10, 40/11 i 53/11/ kojim je propisano da je emiter dužan da dnevno emituje informativni program u trajanju od najmanje 30 minuta , u okviru kojeg najmanje jednu informativnu emisiju u trajanju od najmanje 20 minuta ). Monitoring je vršen u periodu od 06. do 12. maja 2012. godine, u periodu od 24 sata dnevno.
    [Show full text]
  • Montenegro Guidebook
    MONTENEGRO PREFACE Podgorica, the capital of Montenegro, lies in a broad plain crossed by five rivers and surrounded by mountains, just 20 kilometers from the Albanian border. The city has a population of around 180,000 people. Bombed into rubble during World War II, Podgorica was rebuilt into a modern urban center, with high-rise apartment buildings and new office and shopping developments. While the latest Balkan war had a low impact on the physical structures, the economic sanctions had a devastating effect on employment and infrastructure. With the help of foreign investment, urban renewal is evident throughout the city, but much of it may still appear run down. Podgorica has a European-style town center with a pedestrian- only walking street (mall) and an assortment of restaurants, cafes, and boutiques. To many, its principal attraction is as a base for the exploration of Montenegro’s natural beauty, with mountains and wild countryside all around and the stunning Adriatic coastline less than an hour away. This is a mountainous region with barren moorlands and virgin forests, with fast-flowing rivers and picturesque lakes; Skadar Lake in particular is of ecological significance. The coastline is known for its sandy beaches and dramatic coves: for example, Kotor – the city that is protected by UNESCO and the wonderful Cathedral of Saint Typhoon; the unique baroque Perast; Saint George and Our Lady of the Rock islands – all locations that tell a story of a lasting civilization and the wealth of the most wonderful bay in the world. The area around the city of Kotor is a UNESCO World Heritage site for its natural beauty and historic significance.
    [Show full text]
  • Montenegro: IREX Media Sustainability Index 2017
    Journalism remains a battleground, with deep divisions rooted in commercial and political problems. Few of Montenegro’s 73 media outlets distance themselves from political polarization. MONTENEGRO ii MEDIA SUSTAINABILITY INDEX 2017 introduction OVERALL SCORE: 2.04 MONTENEGRO In 2016, Montenegro was marked by political instability, a government crisis, and a parliamentary election. Economic growth at 3 percent was promising but high public debt and 19 percent unemployment still dog the country’s recovery. The European Union (EU) and NATO accession process continue to unfold: Montenegro has opened 24 out of the 35 Accession INegotiation Chapters required for admission to the EU and it is quite realistic to expect that next year Montenegro will be the 29th NATO member-state. While two-thirds of citizens support accession to the EU and a narrow majority also in favor of joining NATO, Serbian nationalists, bolstered by strong Russian support, oppose the process along with the influential Serbian Orthodox Church. Conflict within the ruling coalition, between the dominant political party (the Democratic Party of Socialists, or DPS) and its long-standing ally (the Socialist Democratic Party) resulted in an election on October 16. The DPS won again and, with allies from minority parties, the ruling bloc won 42 seats, while the opposition got 39. The election boasted a 73-percent voter turnout but also saw the arrest of 20 Serbian nationals. They were suspected of preparing a post-election terrorist attack in Montenegrin capital of Podgorica, abetted by two Russian nationals. Subsequently, the opposition still has not conceded the election, although a majority of local electoral observers and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe said that the election was fair, democratic, and free.
    [Show full text]
  • Tiče Me Se – Mjesečni Izvještaj Br. 02
    PARLAMENTARNITI IZBORIČ‐ 16.E OKTOBAR ME 2016. SEMJESEČNI IZVJEŠTAJ Monitoring izborne kampanje medijicivilno društvogovor mržnje Koordinatori izvještaja: Zoran Vujičić i Boris Raonić PARLAMENTARNI IZBORI ‐ 16. OKTOBAR 2016. MJESEČNI IZVJEŠTAJ Izvještaj koji je pred Vama namijenjen je prvenstveno građanima Crne Gore koji imaju pravo glasa i predstavlja doprinos NF Građanska alijansa objektivnijem informisanju glasača i njihovoj aktivnijoj političkoj participaciji. Izvještaj se objavljuje na mjesečnom nivou i sastoji se od tri cjeline: Monitoring medija (RTCG, TV Prva, TV Pink M, TV Vijesti, TV Atlas, dnevne novine Dan, Vijesti, Pobjeda, Dnevne novine); Građansko nadgledanje izbora; Pravo na slobodu javnog okupljanja i govor mržnje. 1. MONITORING TV I ŠTAMPANIH MEDIJA Kvantitativno kvalitativna analiza sadržaja podrazumijeva prikupljanje tekstova iz četiri dnevne novine i priloga iz udarnih informativnih emisija pet televizijskih stanica sa nacionalnom pokrivenošću, te njihovo analiziranje na osnovu unaprijed zadate matrice. Analiza je sprovedena u periodu od 12.09.2016. do 12.10.2016. (uključujući i 12.10.) i obuhvatila je priloge centralnih informativnih emisija na pet glavnih televizija u Crnoj Gori (RTCG, Vijesti, Prva, Atlas i Pink M), kao i tekstove objavljene u: Pobjedi, Vijestima, Danu i Dnevnim novinama. Analiza je obuhvatila tekstove i priloge u kojima se pominju sve partije i koalicije. U toku drugog mjeseca trajanja analize objavljeno je čak 907 priloga u centralnim informativnim emisijama pet analiziranih televizija u kojima je pominjana neka od navedenih partija/koalicija (što je gotovo duplo više nego u prvom mjesecu) i 1.532 teksta u dnevnim novinama (porast za gotovo 10% tekstova u odnosu na prvi mjesec). Najviše priloga emitovala je RTCG - 296, slijede TV Vijesti sa 198, TV Prva sa 177 priloga i Pink M sa 163 priloga.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Service Broadcasting in Montenegro
    ANALITIKA Center for Social Research Working Paper 4/2017 Public Service Broadcasting in Montenegro Nataša Ružić Public Service Broadcasting in Montenegro Nataša Ružić ANALITIKA Center for Social Research Sarajevo, 2017 Title: Public Service Broadcasting in Montenegro Author: Nataša Ružić Published by: Analitika – Center for Social Research Year: 2017 © Analitika – Center for Social Research, All Rights Reserved Publisher Address: Hamdije Kreševljakovića 50, 71000 Sarajevo, BiH [email protected] www.analitika.ba Proofreading: Gina Landor Copy Editing: Mirela Rožajac-Zulčić Design: Branka Ilić DTP: Jasmin Leventa This publication is produced within the project “The Prospect and Development of Public Service Media: Comparative Study of PSB Development in Western Balkans in Light of EU Integration”, performed together with the University of Fribourg’s Department of Communication and Media Research DCM and funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation through the SCOPES (Scientific Cooperation between Eastern Europe and Switzerland) programme. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily represent opinions of the Swiss National Science Foundation, University of Fribourg and Center for Social Research Analitika. Table of Contents 1. Introduction 6 2. Theoretical AND Methodological Framework 9 2.1. Contemporary Debates on PSB on the Global and EU Level 10 2.2. Key Issues Regarding PBS in Post Communist Countries and the Western Balkans 16 2.3. Methodological Framework 18 3. Country Background 19 3.1. Socio-Political and Economic Context 19 3.2. Media System 21 4. PUBLIC SERVICE Broadcasting IN Montenegro: Research FINDINGS 24 4.1. Background on PSB in Montenegro 24 4.2. Regulation of PSB 28 4.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Izvještaj O Sprovođenju Akcionog Plana Za Poglavlje 23
    IZVJEŠTAJ O SPROVOĐENJU AKCIONOG PLANA ZA POGLAVLJE 23 Izvještaj je dio projekta “Aktivno civilno društvo za transparentne, participativne i efektivne reforme“ koji nansira Evropska unija, posredstvom Delegacije Evropske unije u Crnoj Gori, a implementira ga Mreža za a rmaciju nevladinog sektora (MANS) u saradnji sa: Udruženjem mladih sa hendikepom Crne Gore, Centrom za žensko i mirovno obrazovanje – ANIMA, Sigurnom ženskom kućom, Otvorenim Centrom Bona Fide Pljevlja, NVO Sos telefon za žene i djecu žrtve nasilja Plav, NVO Snažna Mama i NVO Stečajci u Crnoj Gori, kao i projekta “Građanski angažman na promociji implementacije Poglavlja 23” koji nansira Britanska ambasada u Podgorici, a sprovodi ga MANS. Mišljenja i stavovi iznijeti u ovom dokumentu ne mogu se ni na koji način smatrati stavovima donatora koji su nansijski podržali projekte. Mreža za afirmaciju nevladinog sektora IZVJEŠTAJ O SPROVOĐENJU AKCIONOG PLANA ZA POGLAVLJE 23 Podgorica, februar 2017. Godine Naziv: Izvještaj o sprovođenju Akcionog plana za poglavlje 23 Izdavač: Mreža za afirmaciju nevladinog sektora – MANS Autori: Vanja Ćalović Marković Vuk Maraš Zorica Ćeranić Aleksandar Mašković Veselin Radulović Mitar Batrović Pavle Ćupić Štampa: 3M - Makarije Tiraž: 100 Kontakt: Dalmatinska 188, Podgorica, Crna Gora Tel: +382 20 266 326 Fax: +382 20 266 328 E-mail: [email protected] www.mans.co.me M A N S : I Z V J E Š T A J O S P R O V O Đ E NJ U A K C I O N O G P L A N A Z A P O G L A V LJ E 2 3 | 2 SADRŽAJ UVOD ....................................................................................................................................................... 6 SAŽETAK ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Australia ########## 7Flix AU 7Mate AU 7Two
    ########## Australia ########## 7Flix AU 7Mate AU 7Two AU 9Gem AU 9Go! AU 9Life AU ABC AU ABC Comedy/ABC Kids NSW AU ABC Me AU ABC News AU ACCTV AU Al Jazeera AU Channel 9 AU Food Network AU Fox Sports 506 HD AU Fox Sports News AU M?ori Television NZ AU NITV AU Nine Adelaide AU Nine Brisbane AU Nine GO Sydney AU Nine Gem Adelaide AU Nine Gem Brisbane AU Nine Gem Melbourne AU Nine Gem Perth AU Nine Gem Sydney AU Nine Go Adelaide AU Nine Go Brisbane AU Nine Go Melbourne AU Nine Go Perth AU Nine Life Adelaide AU Nine Life Brisbane AU Nine Life Melbourne AU Nine Life Perth AU Nine Life Sydney AU Nine Melbourne AU Nine Perth AU Nine Sydney AU One HD AU Pac 12 AU Parliament TV AU Racing.Com AU Redbull TV AU SBS AU SBS Food AU SBS HD AU SBS Viceland AU Seven AU Sky Extreme AU Sky News Extra 1 AU Sky News Extra 2 AU Sky News Extra 3 AU Sky Racing 1 AU Sky Racing 2 AU Sonlife International AU Te Reo AU Ten AU Ten Sports AU Your Money HD AU ########## Crna Gora MNE ########## RTCG 1 MNE RTCG 2 MNE RTCG Sat MNE TV Vijesti MNE Prva TV CG MNE Nova M MNE Pink M MNE Atlas TV MNE Televizija 777 MNE RTS 1 RS RTS 1 (Backup) RS RTS 2 RS RTS 2 (Backup) RS RTS 3 RS RTS 3 (Backup) RS RTS Svet RS RTS Drama RS RTS Muzika RS RTS Trezor RS RTS Zivot RS N1 TV HD Srb RS N1 TV SD Srb RS Nova TV SD RS PRVA Max RS PRVA Plus RS Prva Kick RS Prva RS PRVA World RS FilmBox HD RS Filmbox Extra RS Filmbox Plus RS Film Klub RS Film Klub Extra RS Zadruga Live RS Happy TV RS Happy TV (Backup) RS Pikaboo RS O2.TV RS O2.TV (Backup) RS Studio B RS Nasha TV RS Mag TV RS RTV Vojvodina
    [Show full text]
  • Divided to the Detriment of the Profession
    THE EDITORS’ ROLE IN MEDIA INTEGRITY PROTECTION IN MONTENEGRO DIVIDED TO THE DETRIMENT OF THE PROFESSION by DANIELA VRANKOVIĆ INTRODUCTION The editors in the media in Montenegro, particularly the editors at public broadcaster RTCG, are vulnerable to political divisions and conflicts in the coun- try. That is well illustrated by the resignation of the editors at TVCG as a conse- quence of negotiations between political parties in early 2016.1 No one mentioned the law, the legal procedure or the public broadcaster’s independence, although all of this is strictly regulated in the TVCG’s legal framework. Yet, its programme along with part of the private media was perceived as a stronghold of the ruling Democratic Party of Socialists (DPS), and that is why the opposition insisted on the resignations in the first place. On the other hand, the rest of the media are seen as government opponents. It is of no relevance whether this division is true in its particulars; the fact is that it prevents the media community from reaching agreement and unity in most matters related to journalism. Media regulations in Montenegro hardly mention editors. Basically, they have no delegated responsibilities. No legal responsibility means no legal rights. Self-regulation also pays no special attention to the status of editors. Several non-governmental organisations have proposed amendments to media legisla- tion, some of which have to do with the role of editors in the media. However, this is not likely to become a subject of public discussion any time soon. In this kind of situation, the public interest, supposedly guarded by editors, is rarely the interest that prevails.
    [Show full text]