DOCSLIB.ORG

Assessment of the National Integrity System of Montenegro

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ASSESSMENT OF THE NATIONAL INTEGRITY SYSTEM OF MONTENEGRO This project is supported by the European Union. The content of this does not reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Responsibility for the information and views expressed in the report lies entirely with the author ASSESSMENT OF THE NATIONAL INTEGRITY SYSTEM OF MONTENEGRO Title: ASSESSMENT OF THE NATIONAL INTEGRITY SYSTEM OF MONTENEGRO Publisher: Network for affirmation of NGO sector - MANS Monitoring and Analytic Programme Authors: Vanja Ćalović, Executive Director Vuk Maraš, Monitoring and Analytic Programme Director Aleksandar Maškovic, Analytic Programme Coordinator Veselin Radulovic, MANS’ Legal Advisor Print: 3M - Makarije Edition: 30 copies Contact: Dalmatinska 188, Podgorica, Montenegro Phone: +382 20 266 326 Fax: +382 20 266 328 E-mail: [email protected] www.mans.co.me CONTENTS I INTRODUCTORY NOTE ........................................................................................................................... 7 II EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 11 III ABOUT THE NATIONAL INTEGRITY SYSTEM ASSESMENT .............................................. 21 IV COUNTRY PROFILE OF MONTENEGRO ..................................................................................... 27 V CORRUPTION PROFILE ......................................................................................................................... 31 VI ANTI-CORRUPTION ACTIVITIES ...................................................................................................... 33 VII NATIONAL INTEGRITY SYSTEM ..................................................................................................... 36 Legislature .................................................................................................................................... 37 Executive ........................................................................................................................................ 63 Judiciary .......................................................................................................................................... 79 Public Sector ................................................................................................................................ 101 Prosecution .................................................................................................................................. 125 Police ................................................................................................................................................. 143 Electoral Management Bodies ..................................................................................... 161 Protector of Human Rights and Freedoms ........................................................ 175 State Audit Institution ........................................................................................................ 193 Anticorruption Agencies .................................................................................................... 209 Political Parties ........................................................................................................................ 231 Media ................................................................................................................................................ 245 Civil Society ................................................................................................................................. 265 Bussiness Sector ....................................................................................................................... 279 State Owned Enterprises .................................................................................................. 295 I INTRODUCTORY NOTE Network for Affirmation of NGO Sector (MANS) has conducted research of the Montenegro’s national integrity system for the first time. The assessment of government authorities, state institutions and bodies involved in the fight against corruption, independent bodies, public and private enterprises, as well as civil society organi- zations and the media has been conducted in accordance with the methodology developed by Transparency International. The assessment forms part of a regional project simultaneously implemented in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Ser- bia, Macedonia, Kosovo, Albania and Turkey, and supported by the European Union. A great number of experts from government institutions, independent bodies and civil society organizations has contributed to this report through consultations and comments made during its preparation. Furthermore, colleagues from the Secretariat of Transparency International have provided guidance aimed at improving the content of the report. In this respect, MANS owes a debt of gratitude to all who contributed to this report, hoping that the recom- mendations from this document will be accepted by all stakeholders and put into practice, as well. 7 PARTICIPANTS IN CONSULTATIONS Dobrica Sljivancanin Judicial Council Miras Radovic Supreme Court of Montenegro Maja Karas Boskovic Commission for Prevention of Conflict of Interest Gordana Novakovic Vuksanovic Commission for Prevention of Conflict of Interest Biljana Dulovic Ministry of Interior Aleksandar Zekovic Council for Civilian Control of Police Operations Rajko Pekovic Ministry of Interior Tatjana Savkovic Prosecutorial Council Vera Mijatovic General Secretariat of Government of Montenegro Mara Bogavac Public Procurement Administration Ljiljana Nikolic Public Procurement Administration Branislav Radulovic State Audit Institution Predrag Raznatovic Union of Free Trade Unions of Montenegro Blazenka Dabanovic Human Resources Management Authority Pedja Davidovic Human Resources Management Authority Vladana Miranovic Human Resources Management Authority Sinisa Bjekovic Protector of Human Rights and Freedoms Suzana Radulovic Montenegrin Employers’ Federation Andjelija Lucic Kovacevic Center for Democratic Transition Nikola Djonovic Centre for Civic Education Daliborka Uljarevic Centre for Civic Education Maja Markovic Centre for Development of Non-Governmental Organizations Stevan Milivojevic LGBT Forum Progress Bojana Jokic LGBT Forum Progress Mladen Tomovic Agency for Prevention of Corruption Drazen Buric Supreme State Prosecutor’s Office 8 INTERVIEWEES Milisav Coric State Election Commission Veljo Cadjenovic State Election Commission Damir Davidovic Parliament of Montenegro Vlado Dedovic State Election Commission AzraJasavic Parliament of Montenegro Milutin Djukanovic Parliament of Montenegro MladenTomovic Directorate for Anti-Corruption Initiative Marko Sosic Institute Alternative Ana Selic Centre for Monitoring and Research Svetlana Vukovic Human Resources Management Authority Blazenka Dabanovic Human Resources Management Authority Srdja Kekovic Union of Free Trade Unions of Montenegro Sandra Skataric Public Procurement Administration Sinisa Stankovic Parliament of Montenegro Zarko Sturnovic General Secretariat of Government of Montenegro Boris Darmanovic Dnevne novine Nikola Markovic Daily Dan Mihailo Jovovic Daily Vijesti Veselin Radulovic MANS Aleksandar Zekovic Council for Civilian Control of Police Operations Hasnija Simonovic High Court in Podgorica Dina Bajramspahic Institute Alternative Veselin Vuckovic Supreme State Prosecutor’s Office of Montenegro Milan Radovic Civic Alliance Daliborka Uljarevic Centre for Civic Education Branislav Radulovic State Audit Institution Ana Novakovic Centre for Development of Non-Governmental Organizations Danka Latkovic Office for Cooperation with Non-Governmental Organizations Dejan Milovac MANS Lidija Knezevic Centre for Development of Non-Governmental Organizations Boris Raonic Civic Alliance Genci Nimanbegu Parliament of Montenegro Danijel Kalezic Queer Montenegro Nadja Radulovic Ministry of Finance Marijana Lakovic - Draskovic Ministry of Justice Zoran Radulovic Weekly Monitor 9 II EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report focuses on the strengths and weakness- of transparency, low integrity, poor implementation es of Montenegro’s national integrity system as a of recommendations adopted by state bodies and vital issue for Montenegro’s progress in economic, undue pressure on civil society organizations. social, political and other areas. Transparency Inter- national developed the methodology, used for re- A.1. Legal Framework search purposes worldwide. Bearing in mind that specifi c questions have been prepared for each of Creating a strong legal framework is one of the pre- the areas, covered by this study, it is crucial to un- requisites for enhancing the accountability of state derstand that the quantitative scores for each of institutions and authorities, all with the aim of achiev- the pillars of integrity assessed are not compara- ing better results in the fi ght against corruption. ble across countries. This report covers the period until 31 December 2015, and therefore does not Although the Constitution and the Rules of Procedure cover events that took place in Montenegro after prescribe competencies and manner of work of the this date. The second part of this chapter provides Parliament, the Rules of Procedure do not lay down recommendations for all pillars, which MANS made sanctions for institutions and bodies that fail to pro- when creating the report. vide information and documents to the Parliament or fail to act on the Parliament’s recommendations. For this
Recommended publications
  • Montenegro Investment Climate Statement

    Montenegro Investment Climate Statement

    MONTENEGRO INVESTMENT CLIMATE STATEMENT 2015 U.S. Department of State 2015 Investment Climate Statement | June 2015 Table of Contents Executive Summary 1. Openness To, and Restrictions Upon, Foreign Investment 1.1. Attitude Toward FDI 1.2. Other Investment Policy Reviews 1.3. Laws/Regulations of FDI 1.4. Industrial Strategy 1.5. Limits on Foreign Control 1.6. Privatization Program 1.7. Screening of FDI 1.8. Competition Law 1.9. Investment Trends 1.9.1. Tables 1 and if applicable, Table 1B 2. Conversion and Transfer Policies 2.1. Foreign Exchange 2.1.1. Remittance Policies 3. Expropriation and Compensation 4. Dispute Settlement 4.1. Legal System, Specialized Courts, Judicial Independence, Judgments of Foreign Courts 4.2. Bankruptcy 4.3. Investment Disputes 4.4. International Arbitration 4.4.1. ICSID Convention and New York Convention 4.5. Duration of Dispute Resolution 5. Performance Requirements and Investment Incentives 5.1. WTO/TRIMS 5.2. Investment Incentives 5.2.1. Research and Development 5.3. Performance Requirements 5.4. Data Storage 6. Right to Private Ownership and Establishment 1 U.S. Department of State 2015 Investment Climate Statement | June 2015 7. Protection of Property Rights 7.1. Real Property 7.2. Intellectual Property Rights 8. Transparency of the Regulatory System 9. Efficient Capital Markets and Portfolio Investment 9.1. Money and Banking System, Hostile Takeovers 10. Competition from State-Owned Enterprises 10.1. OECD Guidelines on Corporate Governance of SOEs 10.2. Sovereign Wealth Funds 11. Corporate Social Responsibility 11.1. OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises 12. Political Violence 13. Corruption 13.1.
  • “MLADOST” BIJELA This Analysis Was Carried out in March 2014 F

    “MLADOST” BIJELA This Analysis Was Carried out in March 2014 F

    ANALYSIS OF MEDIA REPORTING ON CHILDREN IN CHLDREN’S HOME “MLADOST” BIJELA This analysis was carried out in March 2014 for the Ministry of Labour and Social Welfare of Montenegro and UNICEF by Ms. Zdenka Jagarinec, Slovenian journalist and editor with more than 20 years of experience, and Mr. Ugljesa Jankovic teaching assistant at the Faculty of Political Science in Podgorica. The analysis and assessment of media reporting on children in the Children’s Home “Mladost” in Bijela was made based on 207 media reports published in Montenegro in the period between1st December 2013 and 31st January 2014. The analysis covered media releases from six daily newspapers – Dnevne novine, Vijesti, Pobjeda, Dan, Večernje novosti and Blic, one weekly magazine - Monitor, three portals – Cafe del Montenegro, Portal Analitika and Bankar.me, and four TV agencies – TVCG, TV Prva, TV Vijesti and TV Pink. The names of media agencies and donors/visitors to “Mladost” in the context of specific media reports have been removed from the text. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ANALYSIS OF MEDIA EXPOSURE OF CHILDREN IN THE CHILDREN’S 3 HOME “MLADOST”, BIJELA I. Statistical analysis of media reporting about children from the Children’s Home 3 “Mladost”, Bijela II. Analysis of media reporting from the aspect of rights of the child 6 III. The context of media reports about children from the Children’s Home 10 “Mladost”, Bijela CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 ANNEXES 17 Annex I: Excerpts from Laws, Documents and Guidelines 17 Annex II: Case study Kolasin 21 Annex III: Examples of reporting about children in Slovenia 23 2 ANALYSIS OF MEDIA EXPOSURE OF CHILDREN IN THE CHILDREN’S HOME “MLADOST”, BIJELA Media have an important impact on the social position of children.
  • YUGOSLAVIA Official No

    YUGOSLAVIA Official No

    YUGOSLAVIA Official No. : C. 169. M. 99. 1939. Conf. E. V. R. 23. Geneva, August 1939. LEAGUE OF NATIONS EUROPEAN CONFERENCE O N RURAL LIFE National Monographs drawn up by Governments YUGOSLAVIA Series of League of Nations Publications EUROPEAN CONFERENCE « « O N RURAL LIFE ^ « 5 Peasant from the Cettinje neighbourhood (Montenegro). TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I n t r o d u c t io n ................................................................................................ 5 I. P op u lation : General C onsiderations............................ g II. A griculture : Structure........................................................ 16 III. A grarian R e f o r m .................................................................. 18 1. Ancient Provinces of the Voivodine, Syrmia, Slavonia, Croatia and S lo v en ia .................... 18 2. Southern S e r b i a ......................................................... 19 3. Bosnia and H erzegovina.......................................... 19 4 . D a lm a tia ....................................................................... 19 IV. T echnical I mprovement of the So i l ....................... 21 V. Improvement of Live-stock and Plants .... 24 VI. A gricultural In d u st r ie s .................................................... 27 VII. L and Settlemen r .................................................................. 28 Technical and Cultural Propaganda in Country D i s t r i c t ............................................................................. 30 VIII. A gricultural Co-operation
  • Development Ofmonitoring Instruments Forjudicial and Law

    Development Ofmonitoring Instruments Forjudicial and Law

    Background Research on Systems and Context on Systems Research Background Development of Monitoring Instruments for Judicial and Law Enforcement institutions in the Western Balkans Background Research on Systems and Context Justice and Home Affairs Statistics in the Western Balkans 2009 - 2011 CARDS Regional Action Programme With funding by the European Commission April 2010 Disclaimers This Report has not been formally edited. The contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNODC or contributory organizations and neither do they imply any endorsement. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNODC concerning the legal status of any country, territory or city or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Comments on this report are welcome and can be sent to: Statistics and Survey Section United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime PO Box 500 1400 Vienna Austria Tel: (+43) 1 26060 5475 Fax: (+43) 1 26060 7 5475 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.unodc.org 1 Development of Monitoring Instruments for Judicial and Law Enforcement Institutions in the Western Balkans 2009-2011 Background Research on Systems and Context 2 Development of Monitoring Instruments for Judicial and Law Enforcement Institutions in the Western Balkans 2009-2011 Background Research on Systems and Context Justice and Home Affairs Statistics in the Western Balkans April 2010 3 Acknowledgements Funding for this report was provided by the European Commission under the CARDS 2006 Regional Action Programme. This report was produced under the responsibility of Statistics and Surveys Section (SASS) and Regional Programme Office for South Eastern Europe (RPOSEE) of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) based on research conducted by the European Institute for Crime Prevention and Control affiliated with the United Nations (HEUNI) and the International Centre for Migration Policy Development (ICMPD).
  • Human Rights in Montenegro

    Human Rights in Montenegro

    MONTENEGRO Program: Monitoring of Human Rights in Montenegro Human Rights in Montenegro - 2010 Podgorica, February 2011 Monitoring programme and human rights protection programme implemented by YIHR MNE with the assistance and cooperation of Civil rights defenders Youth Initiative for Human Rights, Montenegro February 2011 Publisher Boris Raonić Authors Boris Raonić Milan Radović Edina Hasanaga Čobaj Marija Vujović Dejan Minić Denis Zvrko Proofreading Jelena Vukoslavović Ristović Translation Jelena Vukoslavović Ristović Design Nikola Milenković Print AP print, Podgorica 400 copies CONTENT I Previous information ...........................................................................................5 II Legislation and institutional framework of protection in human rights area .......7 III Facing past ......................................................................................................15 IV Torture ............................................................................................................21 V Politically motivated violence ............................................................................41 VI Free legal aid ...................................................................................................49 VII Freedom of expression ....................................................................................55 VIII Religious freedom .........................................................................................65 IX Discrimination ................................................................................................69
  • Analiza Primjene Programskih Standarda

    Analiza Primjene Programskih Standarda

    Crna Gora AGENCIJA ZA ELEKTRONSKE MEDIJE ANALIZA PRIMJENE PROGRAMSKIH STANDARDA - IZABRANE KOMERCIJALNE TV STANICE U CRNOJ GORI - Podgorica, maj 2012. godine SADRŽAJ: I UVOD………….………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 3 II KVANTITATIVNI POKAZATELJI……………………………………………………………………………. 4 III SUMARNI POKAZATELJI …………………………………………………………………………….….…. 18 2 I UVOD Ova analiza urañena je na osnovu podataka dobijenih monitoringom emitovanih programskih sadržaja osam komercijalnih TV emitera opšteg televizijskog programa u Crnoj Gori: TV Atlas, TV Vijesti, TV Elmag, TV IN, TV MBC, NTV Montena, TV Pink M i TV Prva. Riječ je, takoñe, o TV stanicama koje su, shodno članu 71 tačka 1 Zakona o elektronskim medijima, u statusu “nacionalnog komercijalnog emitera” (budući da pokrivaju najmanje 75 odsto stanovništa u najmanje 10 jedinica lokalne samouprave). Predmet pažnje bila je primjena programskih standarda sadržanih u Zakonu o elektronskim medijima Crne Gore i pravilnicima Agencije za elektronske medije, i to: 1. Procenat sopstvene produkcije u odnosu na ukupni emitovani program (Član 11. Pravilnika o uslovima za odreñivanje programskih sadržaja koji se smatraju sopstvenom produkcijom /"Sl.list Crne Gore, br.48/11"/ kojim je propisano da je emiter opšteg televizijskog programa dužan da obezbijedi da programi u sopstvenoj produkciji čine najmanje 10% mjesečnog vremena emitovanja). 2. Trajanje i struktura emitovanog informativnog programa (Član 59 stav 5 Zakona o elektronskim medijima /"Sl.list CG", br. 46/10, 40/11 i 53/11/ kojim je propisano da je emiter dužan da dnevno emituje informativni program u trajanju od najmanje 30 minuta , u okviru kojeg najmanje jednu informativnu emisiju u trajanju od najmanje 20 minuta ). Monitoring je vršen u periodu od 06. do 12. maja 2012. godine, u periodu od 24 sata dnevno.
  • Montenegro Guidebook

    Montenegro Guidebook

    MONTENEGRO PREFACE Podgorica, the capital of Montenegro, lies in a broad plain crossed by five rivers and surrounded by mountains, just 20 kilometers from the Albanian border. The city has a population of around 180,000 people. Bombed into rubble during World War II, Podgorica was rebuilt into a modern urban center, with high-rise apartment buildings and new office and shopping developments. While the latest Balkan war had a low impact on the physical structures, the economic sanctions had a devastating effect on employment and infrastructure. With the help of foreign investment, urban renewal is evident throughout the city, but much of it may still appear run down. Podgorica has a European-style town center with a pedestrian- only walking street (mall) and an assortment of restaurants, cafes, and boutiques. To many, its principal attraction is as a base for the exploration of Montenegro’s natural beauty, with mountains and wild countryside all around and the stunning Adriatic coastline less than an hour away. This is a mountainous region with barren moorlands and virgin forests, with fast-flowing rivers and picturesque lakes; Skadar Lake in particular is of ecological significance. The coastline is known for its sandy beaches and dramatic coves: for example, Kotor – the city that is protected by UNESCO and the wonderful Cathedral of Saint Typhoon; the unique baroque Perast; Saint George and Our Lady of the Rock islands – all locations that tell a story of a lasting civilization and the wealth of the most wonderful bay in the world. The area around the city of Kotor is a UNESCO World Heritage site for its natural beauty and historic significance.
  • Montenegro Media Sector Inquiry with Recommendations for Harmonisation with the Council of Europe and European Union Standards

    Montenegro Media Sector Inquiry with Recommendations for Harmonisation with the Council of Europe and European Union Standards

    Montenegro Media Sector Inquiry with Recommendations for Harmonisation with the Council of Europe and European Union standards Report by Tanja Kerševan Smokvina (ed.) Jean-François Furnémont Marc Janssen Dunja Mijatović Jelena Surčulija Milojević Snežana Trpevska 29 December 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................5 PROJECT BACKGROUND 5 FINDINGS AND PROPOSALS 6 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 13 PURPOSE 13 SCOPE 13 ORGANISATION 14 STRUCTURE 14 METHODOLOGY 16 CH. I: MARKET OVERVIEW AND ASSESSMENT ................................................................................... 17 CONTEXT AND ENVIRONMENT 17 ACCESS AND OFFER 18 ECONOMIC HEALTH AND DYNAMICS 20 LEGAL AND REGULATORY INTERVENTIONS 22 IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PUBLIC 23 POLICY BRIEF 24 CH. II: LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK .............................................................................. 26 HARMONISATION: A STEP FORWARD, TWO BACK 26 LEGISLATION: OVERVIEW AND SUGGESTIONS 26 INSTITUTIONS: GAPS, OVERLAPS AND CAPTURE 35 THE NATIONAL REGULATORY AUTHORITY 40 POLICY BRIEF 42 CH. III: PUBLIC SERVICE MEDIA ......................................................................................................... 44 PUBLICLY FUNDED MEDIA IN MONTENEGRO 44 ORGANISATION AND GOVERNANCE 44 FUNDING 46 AUTONOMY AND INDEPENDENCE 47 CONTENT: UNIVERSALITY AND
  • Vulnerabilities to Russian Influence in Montenegro

    Vulnerabilities to Russian Influence in Montenegro

    KREMLIN WATCH REPORT VULNERABILITIES TO RUSSIAN INFLUENCE IN MONTENEGRO Kremlin Watch Program 2019 EUROPEAN VALUES CENTER FOR SECURITY POLICY European Values Center for Security Policy is a non-governmental, non-partisan institute defending freedom and sovereignty. We protect liberal democracy, the rule of law, and the transatlantic alliance of the Czech Republic. We help defend Europe especially from the malign influences of Russia, China, and Islamic extrem- ists. We envision a free, safe, and prosperous Czechia within a vibrant Central Europe that is an integral part of the transatlantic community and is based on a firm alliance with the USA. Our work is based on individual donors. Use the form at: http://www.europeanvalues.net/o-nas/support- us/, or send your donation directly to our transparent account: CZ69 2010 0000 0022 0125 8162. www.europeanvalues.net [email protected] www.facebook.com/Evropskehodnoty KREMLIN WATCH PROGRAM Kremlin Watch is a strategic program of the European Values Center for Security Policy which aims to ex- pose and confront instruments of Russian influence and disinformation operations focused against West- ern democracies. Author Mgr. Liz Anderson, student of Security and Strategic Studies at Masaryk University and Kremlin Watch Intern Editor Veronika Víchová, Head of Kremlin Watch Program, European Values Center for Security Policy Image Copyright: Page 1, 4, 12: NATO 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY With a population of a little more than 650,000 citizens, levels of Montenegrin society, but most prominently in Montenegro is NATO’s newest and smallest member. It the economic, political, civil society, media, and religious joined the Alliance controversially and without a realms.
  • Introduction Contested Cultural Identities in Public Discourse

    Introduction Contested Cultural Identities in Public Discourse

    Introduction Contested Cultural Identities in Public Discourse Ljiljana Sarie, Stefan Manz, Andreas Musolff and Ingrid Hudabiunigg Europe's eastern rim has been in constant flux ever since the watershed year of 1989. Autocratic regimes have been replaced with stable democ­ racies, and planned economies have given way to a free-market system comprising most of the former communist countries of Central and East­ ern Europe. Whereas most of these nations swiftly embarked on a course toward ED accession, the countries of the former Yugoslavia plunged into ethnic and religious infighting that left the region paralyzed for years and has left a problematic legacy until today. Further east, Turkey's long­ held ambitions to join the EU received yet another setback when it was sidelined during the 2004/2007 round of enlargement These political and economic transformations have triggered fundamental redefinitions of cultural identity, Nations and social groups have had to reposition themselves and their relationship to others within newly emerging polit­ icallandscapes. Although the enlarged ED has created a new closeness between neighbors that were formerly separated by impenetrable phys­ ical and ideological barriers, at the same time it has excluded others that feel like outsiders being left behind. The break-up of the former Yugoslavia has necessitated reformulations of statehood and international relations in the Balkans. We chose to call the area for this endeavor 'Europe'S eastern rim'. With this metaphorical expression, we tried to avoid the widely used terms Mitteleuropa, Central Europe and Eastem Europe because each of these seems to imply different political and ideological conceptions for the countries from the Baltic Sea to the Mediterranean.
  • Why Montenegro's Protests Are Unlikely to Spell the End for Milo

    Why Montenegro's Protests Are Unlikely to Spell the End for Milo

    blogs.lse.ac.uk http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2015/11/20/why-montenegros-protests-are-unlikely-to-spell-the-end-for-milo-dukanovic/ Why Montenegro’s protests are unlikely to spell the end for Milo Đukanović Starting in late September, Montenegro has experienced a stream of protests, with police at times resorting to the use of force to disperse protesters. Mirko Bošković writes that initially the protests were driven by an opposition party, the Democratic Front, and were perceived to be largely pro- Russian and anti-NATO in nature. While this ensured a substantial part of the country’s civil society did not participate in the demonstrations when they first began, the situation changed dramatically following the authorities’ attempts to repress the movement. The anti-government character of the demonstrations has now taken centre stage, with protesters calling for ‘the first free and fair elections in the history of Montenegro’ and the end of Milo Đukanović‘s 26-year-long rule. The ongoing protests that are taking place in Montenegro’s capital Podgorica started on 27 September, when the Democratic Front (DF), a composite coalition of opposition parties with different ideologies, placed tents on the boulevard in front of the Parliament, in an act reminiscent of the recent protests in neighbouring Macedonia. The demonstrations were directed against the government but also against Montenegro’s NATO membership. Officially, the goal of the protesters was not only to stop Montenegro’s advance toward joining NATO, whose invitation is expected to come on 1 December, but the timing of the demonstrations and the way in which the protesters have acted could not hide that objective.
  • 1998 Montenegro R01761

    1998 Montenegro R01761

    Date Printed: 11/03/2008 JTS Box Number: IFES 8 Tab Number: 11 Document Title: Republic of Montenegro: Voter Awareness Assessment Legal Review, Nov 1997-Feb Document Date: 1998 Document Country: Montenegro IFES ID: R01761 A L o F \ o REpUBLIC OF MONTENEGRO VOTER AWARENESS ASSESSMENT LEGAL REVIEW NOVEMBER 1997 - FEBRUARY 1998 PREPARED By: CATHERINE BARNES, PROJECT TEAM LEADER ALEXANDRA LEV ADITIS, PROGRAM ASSISTANT DANIEL FINN, LEGAL ADVISOR IFES ~ International Foundation for Election Systems 1l0115th Street, NW, Third Floor Washington, DC 20005 This Report was made possible by a grant/rom the United States Agency for International Development (USA/D). The opinions expressed in this Report are solely of the International Foundation/or Election Systems (IFES). This material is in the public domain and may be reproduced wilhout permission, citation is appreciated. REpUBLIC OF MONTENEGRO VOTER AWARENESS ASSESSMENT LEGAL REVIEW NOVEMBER 1997-FEBRUARY 1998 ISBN 1-879720-48-5 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................•................................................... :.................................................... 1 VOTER AWARENESS ASSESSMENT I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................5 A. MISSION BACKGROUND .......................................................................................5 B. MISSION OBJECTIVES ...........................................................................................5 C. SCOPE OF MISSION ...............................................................................................6