DOCSLIB.ORG

Technologies to Maintain Biological Diversity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Technologies To Maintain Biological Diversity March 1987 NTIS order #PB87-207494 Recommended Citation: U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Technologies To Maintain Biologi- cal Diversity, OTA-F-330 (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, March 1987]. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 87-619803 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 The reduction of the Earth’s biological diversity has emerged as a public policy issue in the last several years. Growing awareness of this planetary problem has prompted increased study of the subject and has led to calls to increase public and private initiatives to address the problem, This interest in maintaining biological diversity has created a common ground for a variety of groups concerned with implications of a reduction or ultimate loss of the planet’s genetic, species, or eco- system diversity, One major concern is that loss of plant, animal, and microbial resources may impair future options to develop new important products and processes in agricul- ture, medicine, and industry. Concerns also exist that loss of diversity undermines the potential of populations and species to respond or adapt to changing environ- mental conditions. Because humans ultimately depend on environmental support functions, special caution should be taken to ensure that diversity 1osses do not disrupt these functions. Finally, esthetic and ethical motivation to avoid the irre- versible loss of unique life forms has played an increasingly major role in promot- ing public and private programs to conserve particular species or habitats, The broad implications of loss of biological diversity are also reflected in the different concerns and jurisdictions of congressional committees that requested or supported this study. Requesters include the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology; Senate Committee on Foreign Relations; and Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry. The House Committee on Foreign Affairs; House Committee on Agriculture; and House Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries endorsed the requested study. The task presented to OTA by these committees was to clarify for Congress the nature of the problems of reduction of the Earth’s biological diversity and to set forth a range of policy options available to Congress to respond to various con- cerns. The principal aim of this report is to identify and assess the technological and institutional opportunities and constraints to maintaining biological diversity in the united States and worldwide. Two background papers (Grassroots Conser- vation of Biological Diversity in the United States and Maintaining Biological Diver- sity in the United States: Data Considerations) and a staff paper (The Role of U.S. Development Assistance in Maintaining Bio]ogical Diversity in Developing Coun- tries) were also prepared in conjunction with this study. OTA is grateful for the valuable assistance of the study’s advisory panel, work- groups, workshop participants, authors of background papers, and the many other reviewers from the public and private sectors who provided advice and informa- tion throughout the course of this assessment. As with all OTA studies, the content of this report is the sole responsibility of OTA. Director {11. Advisory Panel Technologies To Maintain Biological Diversity Kenneth Dahlberg, Chair Major Goodman Department of Political Science Department of Crop Science Western Michigan University North Carolina State University Stephen Brush Grenville Lucas International Agricultural Development The Herbarium University of California, Davis Kew Royal Botanic Gardens Peter Carlson Richard Norgaard Director Department of Agricultural and Resource Crop Genetics International Economics University of California, Berkeley Rita Colwell Office of the Vice President for Academic Robert Prescott-Allen Affairs Partner University of Maryland, Adelphi PADATA, Inc. Raymond Dasmann Paul Risser Department of Environmental Studies Vice President for Research University of California, Santa Cruz University of New Mexico Clarence Dias Oliver Ryder President Research Department International Center for Law in San Diego Zoo Development Michael Soul& Donald Duvick Adjunct Professor Senior Vice President of Research School of Natural Resources Pioneer Hi-Bred International University of Michigan David Ehrenfeld John Sullivan Cook College Vice President of production Rutgers University American Breeders Service NOTE: OTA appreciates and is grateful for the valuable assistance and thoughtful critiques provided by the advisory panel members. The panel does not, however, necessarily approve, disapprove, or endorse this report. OTA assumes full responsibility for the report and the accuracy of its contents. iv OTA Project Staff Technologies To Maintain Biological Diversity Roger C. Herdman, Assistant Director, OTA Health and Life Sciences Division Walter E. Parham, Food and Renewable Resources Program Manager Analytical Staff Susan Shen, Project Director and Analyst Edward F, MacDonald, Analyst Michael S. Strauss, Analyst Catherine Carlson, ’ Research Assistant Robert Grossman,’ Anal~wt Allen Ruby, Research Assistant Contractors James L. Chamberlain David Netter Robert Prescott-Allen Bruce Ross-Sheriff Linda Starke’ and Lisa Olson, ’ Editors Administrative Staff Patricia Durana,” Beckie Erickson,’ and Sally Shaforth,” Administrative Assistants Nellie Hammond, Secretary Carolyn Swann, Secretar&y 1 Th rough January 1986, 2’1’hrough August I $)8s, 3Summer 1985. 4Through August 1986. 5After August 1986, ~’17h rough July I !385, 7Thruugh Cktober 1 !]86, 8F’rom [)[1(:. 15, 1986, CONTENTS Chapter Page l. Summary and Options for Congress . 3 Part I: INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 2. Importance of Biological Diversity. 37 3. Status of Biological Diversity . 63 4. Interventions To Maintain Biological Diversity . , . 89 Part II: TECHNOLOGIES 5. Maintaining Biological Diversity Onsite . ............101 6. Maintaining Animal Diversity Offsite , . ,., ., . .137 7. Maintaining Plant Diversity Offsite . ........169 8. Maintaining Microbial Diversity. ..........205 Part III: INSTITUTIONS 9. Maintaining Biological Diversity in the United States . .. ....221 10. Maintaining Biological Diversity Internationally . ..............,.....253 11. Biological Diversity and Development Assistance . , ..,285 APPENDIXES: A. Glossary of Acronyms . .............311 B. Glossary of Terms . ., ., ., ., ., , ., ..., . ..., . ...313 C. Participants of Technical Workgroups . ..............317’ D. Grassroots Workshop Participants. ..., . ....319 E, Commissioned Papers and Authors. .................,..........320 Chapter 1 Summary and Options for Congress . CONTENTS Page The Problem . 3 Interventions To Maintain Biological Diversity . 6 The Role of Congress . 8 Strengthen the National Commitment To Maintain Biological Diversity . 8 Option: Establish a National Biological Diversity Act . 11 Option: Develop a National Conservation Strategy . 12 Option: Amend Legislation of Federal Agencies . 12 Option: Establish a National Conservation Education Act...... 14 Option: Amend the International Security and Development Act . 14 Increase the Nation’s Ability to Maintain Diversity . I!i Option: Direct the National Science Foundation-To Establish a Conservation Biology Program . 16 Option: Establish a National Endowment for Biological Diversity . 17 Option: Provide Sufficient Funding to Existing Programs . 18 Option: Amend Legislation To Improve Onsite and Offsite Program Links . 18 Option: Establish New Programs To Fill Specific Gaps . 19 Enhance the Knowledge Base . .....;... .; . 19 Option: Establish a Small Clearinghouse for Biological Data . 2o Option: Fund Existing Network of Natural Heritage Conservation Data Centers . .......+.. 21 Support International Initiatives to Maintain Biological Diversity . 22 Option: Increase Support of International Programs . 23 Option: Continue To Encourage Multilateral Development Banks to Develop and Implement Environmental Policies. 23 Option: Examine U.S. Options on the Issue of International Exchange of Genetic Resources . 25 Option: Amend the Export Administration Act . 26 Address Loss of Biological Diversity in Developing Countries. 27 Option: Restructure Conservation~Related Sections of the Foreign Assistance Act. 28 Option: Direct AID To Adopt Strategic Approach . 29 Option: Direct AID To Acquire Greater Access to Conservation Expertise . 30 Option: Establish a New Funding Account for Conservation Initiatives . 31 Option: Apply More Public Law 480 Funds To Promote Diversity Conservation . 31 Tables Table No. Page l-1. Examples of Management Systems To Maintain Biological Diversity . 6 l-2. Management Systems and Conservation Objectives . 6 l-3. Federal Laws Relating to Biological Diversity Maintenance . 9 l-4. Summary of Policy Issues and Options for Congressional Action Related to Biological Diversity Maintenance . 10 Box Box No. Page l-A. What Is Biological Diversity? . 3 Chapter 1 Summary and Options for Congress Most biological diversity survives without hu- intervention by applying specific technologies. man interventions to maintain it. But as natural A spectrum of technologies are available to sup- areas become progressively modified by human port maintenance of biological diversity (de- activities, maintaining a diversity of ecosytems, fined in box l-A), species, and genes will increasingly depend on Box I-A.—What Is Biological Diversity? Biological diversity
Recommended publications
  • A Protocol for Online Documentation of Spider Biodiversity Inventories Applied to a Mexican Tropical Wet Forest (Araneae, Araneomorphae)

    A Protocol for Online Documentation of Spider Biodiversity Inventories Applied to a Mexican Tropical Wet Forest (Araneae, Araneomorphae)

    Zootaxa 4722 (3): 241–269 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2020 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4722.3.2 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6AC6E70B-6E6A-4D46-9C8A-2260B929E471 A protocol for online documentation of spider biodiversity inventories applied to a Mexican tropical wet forest (Araneae, Araneomorphae) FERNANDO ÁLVAREZ-PADILLA1, 2, M. ANTONIO GALÁN-SÁNCHEZ1 & F. JAVIER SALGUEIRO- SEPÚLVEDA1 1Laboratorio de Aracnología, Facultad de Ciencias, Departamento de Biología Comparada, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito Exterior s/n, Colonia Copilco el Bajo. C. P. 04510. Del. Coyoacán, Ciudad de México, México. E-mail: [email protected] 2Corresponding author Abstract Spider community inventories have relatively well-established standardized collecting protocols. Such protocols set rules for the orderly acquisition of samples to estimate community parameters and to establish comparisons between areas. These methods have been tested worldwide, providing useful data for inventory planning and optimal sampling allocation efforts. The taxonomic counterpart of biodiversity inventories has received considerably less attention. Species lists and their relative abundances are the only link between the community parameters resulting from a biotic inventory and the biology of the species that live there. However, this connection is lost or speculative at best for species only partially identified (e. g., to genus but not to species). This link is particularly important for diverse tropical regions were many taxa are undescribed or little known such as spiders. One approach to this problem has been the development of biodiversity inventory websites that document the morphology of the species with digital images organized as standard views.
  • SA Spider Checklist

    SA Spider Checklist

    REVIEW ZOOS' PRINT JOURNAL 22(2): 2551-2597 CHECKLIST OF SPIDERS (ARACHNIDA: ARANEAE) OF SOUTH ASIA INCLUDING THE 2006 UPDATE OF INDIAN SPIDER CHECKLIST Manju Siliwal 1 and Sanjay Molur 2,3 1,2 Wildlife Information & Liaison Development (WILD) Society, 3 Zoo Outreach Organisation (ZOO) 29-1, Bharathi Colony, Peelamedu, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641004, India Email: 1 [email protected]; 3 [email protected] ABSTRACT Thesaurus, (Vol. 1) in 1734 (Smith, 2001). Most of the spiders After one year since publication of the Indian Checklist, this is described during the British period from South Asia were by an attempt to provide a comprehensive checklist of spiders of foreigners based on the specimens deposited in different South Asia with eight countries - Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. The European Museums. Indian checklist is also updated for 2006. The South Asian While the Indian checklist (Siliwal et al., 2005) is more spider list is also compiled following The World Spider Catalog accurate, the South Asian spider checklist is not critically by Platnick and other peer-reviewed publications since the last scrutinized due to lack of complete literature, but it gives an update. In total, 2299 species of spiders in 67 families have overview of species found in various South Asian countries, been reported from South Asia. There are 39 species included in this regions checklist that are not listed in the World Catalog gives the endemism of species and forms a basis for careful of Spiders. Taxonomic verification is recommended for 51 species. and participatory work by arachnologists in the region.
  • Prof. Dr. Ir. Patrick De Clercq Department of Crop Protection, Laboratory of Agrozoology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University

    Prof. Dr. Ir. Patrick De Clercq Department of Crop Protection, Laboratory of Agrozoology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University

    Promoters: Prof. dr. ir. Patrick De Clercq Department of Crop Protection, Laboratory of Agrozoology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University Prof. dr. ir. Luc Tirry Department of Crop Protection, Laboratory of Agrozoology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University Dr. Bruno Gobin, PCS- Ornamental Plant Research Dean: Prof. dr. ir. Marc Van Meirvenne Rector: Prof. dr. Anne De Paepe Effects of temperature regime and food supplementation on the performance of phytoseiid mites as biological control agents by Ir. Dominiek Vangansbeke Thesis submitted in the fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor (PhD) in Applied Biological Sciences Dutch translation: Effecten van temperatuurregime en voedingssupplementen op de prestaties van Phytoseiidae roofmijten als biologische bestrijders Please refer to this work as follows: Vangansbeke, D. (2015) Effects of temperature regime and food supplementation on the performance of phytoseiid mites as biological control agents. Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium Front and backcover photographs: Dominiek Vangansbeke ISBN-number: 978-90-5989-847-9 This study was funded by grant number 090931 from the Institute for Promotion of Innovation by Science and Technology in Flanders (IWT). The research was conducted at the Laboratory of Agrozoology, Department of Crop Protection, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, 9000 Ghent, Belgium and partly at PCS-Ornamental Plant Research, Schaessestraat 18, 9070 Destelbergen, Belgium The author and promoters give permission to use this study for consultation and to copy parts of it for personal use only. Every other use is subject to the copyright laws. Permission to reproduce any material should be obtained from the author. Table of content List of abbreviations ..........................................................................................................................i Scope and thesis outline .................................................................................................................
  • On Three Monotypic Nursery Web Spider Genera from Madagascar

    On Three Monotypic Nursery Web Spider Genera from Madagascar

    Zootaxa 3750 (3): 277–288 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2013 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3750.3.7 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:34710705-6F09-4489-B206-C2CA969D77DE On three monotypic nursery web spider genera from Madagascar with first description of the male of Tallonia picta Simon, 1889 and redescription of the type-species of Paracladycnis Blandin, 1979 and Thalassiopsis Roewer, 1955 (Araneae: Lycosoidea: Pisauridae) ESTEVAM L. CRUZ DA SILVA & PETRA SIERWALD Division of Insects, Field Museum of Natural History, 1400 S Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL, 60605, USA. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] With 333 described species, the Pisauridae is a moderately species-rich spider family. The family is world wide in distribution and its members exhibit an exceptionally wide range of foraging and prey capture behavior, from web- based hunters, water surface hunters to ambusher hunters in the vegetation. While some pisaurid genera are diverse, boasting numerous species, such as Dolomedes with 96 described species, nearly half of pisaurid genera (22/48) are monotypic (Platnick 2013). Recent collecting and biodiversity research has uncovered several new species, especially from heretofore poorly collected regions in Africa (including Madagascar) and Asia (e.g. Jaeger 2011, Jocqué 1994). Initial steps have been undertaken to develop a phylogenetic framework for parts of the family, e.g., Sierwald 1987; Santos 2007. However, no phylogenetic analysis exists that includes a representatively wide range of genera. The clade Pisaurinae (see Sierwald 1997) appears to be well supported by morphological characters, while the relationships among non-pisaurine genera remain uncertain.
  • The Spiders and Scorpions of the Santa Catalina Mountain Area, Arizona

    The Spiders and Scorpions of the Santa Catalina Mountain Area, Arizona

    The spiders and scorpions of the Santa Catalina Mountain Area, Arizona Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Beatty, Joseph Albert, 1931- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 29/09/2021 16:48:28 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/551513 THE SPIDERS AND SCORPIONS OF THE SANTA CATALINA MOUNTAIN AREA, ARIZONA by Joseph A. Beatty < • • : r . ' ; : ■ v • 1 ■ - ' A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF ZOOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In the Graduate College UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1961 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfill­ ment of requirements for an advanced degree at the Uni­ versity of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgement of source is made. Requests for per­ mission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in their judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author.
  • Wsn 47(2) (2016) 298-317 Eissn 2392-2192

    Wsn 47(2) (2016) 298-317 Eissn 2392-2192

    Available online at www.worldscientificnews.com WSN 47(2) (2016) 298-317 EISSN 2392-2192 Indian Lycosoidea Sundevall (Araneae: Opisthothelae: Araneomorphae) in Different States and Union Territories Including an Annotated Checklist Dhruba Chandra Dhali1,*, P. M. Sureshan1, Kailash Chandra2 1Zoological Survey of India, Western Ghat Regional Centre, Kozkhikore - 673006, India 2Zoological Survey of India, M- Block, New Alipore, Kolkata - 700053, India *E-mail address: [email protected] ABSTRACT Annotated checklist of Lycosoidea so far recorded from different states and union territories of India reveals a total of 251 species under 38 genera belonging five families. The review cleared that diversity of lycosoid spider fauna is maximum in West Bengal followed by Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu and they are not distributed maximally in the states and union territories within Biodiversity hotspots. This fauna is distributed all over the country. There is nearly 69.35% endemism (in context of India). Keywords: Distribution; Lycosoidea; India; State; Union Territories; Annotated; checklist 1. INTRODUCTION Spiders, composing the order Araneae Clerck, 1757 is the largest group among arachnids and separated into two suborders: Mesothelae Pocock, 1892 (segmented spiders) World Scientific News 47(2) (2016) 298-317 and Opisthothelae Pocock, 1892 (includes all other spiders). Later one is further divided into two infraorders: Mygalomorphae Pocock, 1892 (ancient' spiders) and Araneomorphae Smith, 1902 (modern' spiders include the vast majority of spiders) (Coddington, 2005; WSC, 2015). Araneomorphae composed of 99 families and most of them can be divided into at least six clades and 11 super-families, though some are still unplaced in that system (Zhang, 2011).
  • Diversity and Distribution of Pisauridae (Araneae: Araneomorphae: Arachnida) in India

    Diversity and Distribution of Pisauridae (Araneae: Araneomorphae: Arachnida) in India

    International Journal of Entomology Research ISSN: 2455-4758; Impact Factor: RJIF 5.24 Received: 11-12-2020; Accepted: 13-01-2021; Published: 17-02-2021 www.entomologyjournals.com Volume 6; Issue 1; 2021; Page No. 119-125 Diversity and distribution of Pisauridae (Araneae: Araneomorphae: Arachnida) in India Ajeet Kumar Tiwari1, Rajendra Singh2* 1 Department of Zoology, Buddha PG College, Kushinagar, Uttar Pradesh, India 2 Department of Zoology, Deendayal Upadhyay University of Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India Abstract The present article deals with the faunal diversity and distribution of one of the spider family Pisauridae (Araneae: Arachnida), commonly known as nursery web spider, raft spider, fishing spider, in different Indian states and union territories and provides an update checklist based on the literature published up to January 31, 2021. It includes 29 species of spiders described under 11 genera in 18 states and 3 union territories (Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Jammu and Kashmir and Puducherry), out of which 12 species are endemic. The records demonstrated that only 3 species of these spiders are distributed widely: Dendrolycosa gitae (Tikader, 1970) (11 Indian states, 1 union territory), Nilus albocinctus (Doleschall, 1859) (8 Indian states, 1 union territories), and Perenethis venusta L. Koch, 1878 (8 Indian states). Maximum 13 species of these spiders were recorded in Maharashtra followed by 10 species in Tamil Nadu. Keywords: pisauridae, nursery web spider, raft spider, fishing spider, faunal diversity, and checklist Introduction nursery web until their second moult while the female The members of the order Araneae (Arachnida: Chelicerata: stands guard over it. These spiders are moderately large Arthropoda) are commonly known as spiders and ranks (above 10 mm) with long legs.
  • List of Authors/Collectors/Illustrators of Virginia Spiders

    List of Authors/Collectors/Illustrators of Virginia Spiders

    Banisteria, Number 41, pages 51-58 © 2013 Virginia Natural History Society History of Araneology in Virginia Barbara J. Abraham Department of Biological Sciences Hampton University Hampton, Virginia 23668 ABSTRACT At least from the 1600s to the present, spiders have been observed, collected, and studied in Virginia. This paper endeavors to outline the history of araneology in Virginia from its inception through the first decade of the 21st century, including researchers of spiders at Virginia institutions and those who have studied Virginia spiders. Key words: araneology, history, spiders, Virginia. INTRODUCTION planning a Natural History of Virginia (Lewis, 1957). Instead, “Some Observations concerning Insects made The study of spiders in Virginia has a venerable by Mr. John Banister in Virginia, A.D. 1680” was history, beginning in the 17th century and continuing to published by Petiver (Banister & Petiver, 1701). the present. Through the efforts of natural historians, Banister was the first to systematically describe any of entomologists, and ecologists, we know much about the spiders of North America; not until between 1791 these important arachnids, but distributions and even and 1802 did John Abbot draw the spiders of Carolina the presence of some species in Virginia remain to be and Georgia (Ewan & Ewan, 1970). discovered. In the 20th and 21st centuries, quantitative, Lack of proper attribution by Martin Lister (a 17th manipulative studies have increasingly replaced century physician and natural historian), who received anecdotal observations, and spiders are used as model Banister’s specimens in 1680 and data for illustrations organisms to address ecological and evolutionary by Petiver, kept Banister’s Virginia specimens from hypotheses.
  • A Check-List of the Spiders of Arkansas Peggy Rae Dorris Henderson State University

    A Check-List of the Spiders of Arkansas Peggy Rae Dorris Henderson State University

    Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Volume 39 Article 10 1985 A Check-list of the Spiders of Arkansas Peggy Rae Dorris Henderson State University Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas Part of the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Dorris, Peggy Rae (1985) "A Check-list of the Spiders of Arkansas," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 39 , Article 10. Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol39/iss1/10 This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 39 [1985], Art. 10 A CHECK-LIST OF THE SPIDERS OF ARKANSAS PEGGY RAE DORRIS Henderson State University Arkadelphia, AR 71923 ABSTRACT Collections of spiders were made from 1966, to the present in the sixphysiographic regions of Arkan- sas. During this time 435 species representing 35 families were collected and recorded. INTRODUCTION mixed grasses, fields ofmixed grasses, shrubs, herbs, mud-dauber nests, and water surfaces. The number ofspecimens decreased as temperature Research has been in progress for the past 18 years to provide a and humidity increased.
  • New and Hitherto Unknown Nursery Web Spider Species (Araneae: Pisauridae) from the Reserve Forests of Dooars, West Bengal, India

    New and Hitherto Unknown Nursery Web Spider Species (Araneae: Pisauridae) from the Reserve Forests of Dooars, West Bengal, India

    _____________Mun. Ent. Zool. Vol. 5, No. 1, January 2010__________ 225 NEW AND HITHERTO UNKNOWN NURSERY WEB SPIDER SPECIES (ARANEAE: PISAURIDAE) FROM THE RESERVE FORESTS OF DOOARS, WEST BENGAL, INDIA Souvik Sen*, Sumana Saha** and Dinendra Raychaudhuri* *Entomology Laboratory, Dept. of Zoology, University of Calcutta, 35, B.C. Road, Kolkata- 700019, INDIA. E-mails: [email protected] and [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] **Dept. of Zoology, Lady Brabourne College, Govt. of West Bengal, P- ½, Suhrawardy Avenue, Kolkata- 700017, INDIA. E-mails: [email protected] [Sen, S., Saha, S. & Raychaudhuri, D. 2010. New and hitherto unknown nursery web spider species (Araneae: Pisauridae) from the reserve forests of Dooars, West Bengal, India. Munis Entomology & Zoology, 5 (1): 225-231] ABSTRACT: The paper deals with the taxonomy of a new species and a hitherto unknown species of Nursery web spider from the Reserve Forests of Dooars, West Bengal, India. The species Thalassius pseudoalbocinctus is recognized as new to science, and hence described and illustrated. Hitherto unknown species Polyboea zonaformis (Wang) is being reported for the first time from India. KEY WORDS: Thalassius, Polyboea, new species, unknown species, Forests, West Bengal, India. Indian nursery web spiders have previously been treated by Pocock (1900), Tikader (1970), Patel (1987), Patel & Reddy (1990), Reddy & Patel (1993), Jose et.al. (2003, 2007) and Biswas & Roy (2005). The current World list of spiders include 339 pisaurid species under 53 genera (Platnick, 2009). In India they are represented by 20 species belonging to 9 genera (Sebastian & Peter, 2009). So far one Polyboea species P. vulpina Thorell and two Thalassius species T.
  • University of California Santa Cruz Social And

    University of California Santa Cruz Social And

    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ SOCIAL AND ECOLOGICAL CONNECTIVITY IN KELP FOREST ECOSYSTEMS A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY by Rachel Zuercher December 2018 The Dissertation of Rachel Zuercher is approved: ____________________________________ Professor Mark H. Carr, chair ____________________________________ Dr. Carrie Pomeroy ____________________________________ Professor Peter T. Raimondi ____________________________________ Professor Paul L. Koch ____________________________ Lori Kletzer Vice Provost and Dean of Graduate Studies Copyright © by Rachel Zuercher 2018 Table of Contents Table of Contents ....................................................................................................... iii List of Tables ............................................................................................................... v List of Figures ............................................................................................................ vii Abstract ...................................................................................................................... xii Acknowledgements .................................................................................................. xvi Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 Chapter 1: Coastal marine ecosystem connectivity: pelagic ocean to kelp forest subsidies

  • OF OANADA Llastern Cereal and Oilsced Beeearch Centrc Centre De Recherches De I'est Sur Lcb Csr6ales Et Cl6agineur Edifice K

    I-HE INSEOTS AND ARACHNIDS OF OANADA llastern Cereal and Oilsced Beeearch Centrc Centre de recherches de I'Est sur lcb cSr6ales et cl6agineur Edifice K. W. Nsatby Building Central Expeiimental Farm / Ferme exptirimentale centrale 0ttawa, Ontario, Canada KlA 0C6 THE INSECTS AND ARACHNIDS OF OANADA PART 5 The Crab Spiders cf Canada and Alaska Araneae' Philodromidae and Thomisidae Charles D. Dondale and James H. Redner Biosystematir:s Research Institute Ottawa, Ontario Research Branch Canada Department of Agriculture Publication 1663 1918 \ o Minister of Supply and Services Canada 1978 Available by mail from Printing and Publishing Supply and Services Canada Hull, Quebec, Canada KIA 0S9 or through your bookseller. Catalogue No. A42-421 1978-5 Canada: $7.50 ISBN 0-660-10104-l Other countries: $9.00 Prices subject to change without notice. printed by Friesen Printers Altona, Man. Contract No. 08KT.01,{05-8-10009 The Insects and Arachnids of Canada Part 1. Collecting, Preparing, and Preserving Insects, Mites, and Spiders, compiled by J. E. H. Martin, Biosystematics Research Institute, Ottawa, 7977. Part2. The Bark Beetles of Canada and Alaska (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), by D. E. Bright, Jr., Biosystematics Research Institute, Ottawa, 1976. Part 3. The Aradidae of Canada (Hemiptera: Aradidae), by R. Matsuda, Biosystematics Research Institute, Ottaw a, \97 7 . Part 4. The Anthocoridae of Canada and Alaska (Heteroptera: Antho- coridae), by L. A. Kelton, Biosystematics Research Institute, Ottawa, 1978. Contents Acknowledgments .............. 7 Introduction 9 Anatomy 9 Technique 10 Classification of spider families t2 Key to families 13 Family Philodromidae ................... 25 Key to genera of Philodromidae .............. 26 Genus Ebo Keyserling 29 Key to species of Ebo 29 G enus P hilo drom us W alckenaer ...........