DOCSLIB.ORG

Wsn 47(2) (2016) 298-317 Eissn 2392-2192

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wsn 47(2) (2016) 298-317 Eissn 2392-2192 Available online at www.worldscientificnews.com WSN 47(2) (2016) 298-317 EISSN 2392-2192 Indian Lycosoidea Sundevall (Araneae: Opisthothelae: Araneomorphae) in Different States and Union Territories Including an Annotated Checklist Dhruba Chandra Dhali1,*, P. M. Sureshan1, Kailash Chandra2 1Zoological Survey of India, Western Ghat Regional Centre, Kozkhikore - 673006, India 2Zoological Survey of India, M- Block, New Alipore, Kolkata - 700053, India *E-mail address: [email protected] ABSTRACT Annotated checklist of Lycosoidea so far recorded from different states and union territories of India reveals a total of 251 species under 38 genera belonging five families. The review cleared that diversity of lycosoid spider fauna is maximum in West Bengal followed by Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu and they are not distributed maximally in the states and union territories within Biodiversity hotspots. This fauna is distributed all over the country. There is nearly 69.35% endemism (in context of India). Keywords: Distribution; Lycosoidea; India; State; Union Territories; Annotated; checklist 1. INTRODUCTION Spiders, composing the order Araneae Clerck, 1757 is the largest group among arachnids and separated into two suborders: Mesothelae Pocock, 1892 (segmented spiders) World Scientific News 47(2) (2016) 298-317 and Opisthothelae Pocock, 1892 (includes all other spiders). Later one is further divided into two infraorders: Mygalomorphae Pocock, 1892 (ancient' spiders) and Araneomorphae Smith, 1902 (modern' spiders include the vast majority of spiders) (Coddington, 2005; WSC, 2015). Araneomorphae composed of 99 families and most of them can be divided into at least six clades and 11 super-families, though some are still unplaced in that system (Zhang, 2011). Zhang (2011) included 11 families under Superfamily Lycosoidea Sundevall, 1833 of the Clade ‘Amaurobioids’ including fossil records. Worldwide 4219 species of 286 genera distributed over 9 families (WSC, 2016) under the superfamily so far recorded while 248 species of 38 genera belonging five families under the superfamily so far recorded only from India (WSC, 2016). Lycosoidea are characterized by a grate shaped tapetum in the indirect eyes (Homann 1971; Levi 1982). Present list includes a total of 248 species of Lycosidea distributed over 38 genera under five families from India and their distribution in states and union territories. 2. MATERIALS AND METHODS The present check-list is based on an examination of specimens deposited in the National Zoological Collection (NZC), Zoological Survey of India and on reviews of the published literatures, including several recent world catalogues of spiders (WSC, 2016), recent book (Sebastian and Peter, 2009), checklist (Siliwal et al., 2005; Siliwal and Molur, 2007; Keswani et al., 2012), monograph (Sen et al. 2015), published papers in different National and International journals (Tikader and Malhotra, 1980; Tikader and Biawas, 1981; Tikader, 1987; Biswas and Biswas, 1992, 2004,’ 06; Biswas, and Majumder, 1995; Bastawade and Borkar. 2008; Gajbe, 2004,’ 07,’ 08; Malamel et al., 2013; Ahmed et al., 2015). Abbreviations: AS = Assam, AP = Andhra Pradesh, AN = Andaman & Nicobar Islands, ARP = Arunachal Pradesh, BH = Bihar, CG = Chhattisgarh, ECI = Eastern Central India, GJ = Gujarat, GO = Goa, HP = Himachal Pradesh, HR = Haryana, OR = Orissa, MG = Meghalaya, MP = Madhya Pradesh, PJ = Punjab, JH = Jharkhand, JK = Jammu & Kashmir, RJ = Rajasthan, TG = Telangana, TN = Tamil Nadu, TP = Tripura, KL = Kerala, KA = Karnataka, MZ = Mizoram, MN = Manipur, SI = South India, MR = Maharashtra, PC = Pondicherry, WB = West Bengal, UK = Uttarakhand, UP = Uttar Pradesh, WSC = World Spider Catalogue. 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION India has 29 states and seven union territories, from which only 27 states and two union territories lycosoids are recorded so far. A total of 251 species of lycosoids distributed over 38 genera belonging five families are known so far from India (Table 1). From West Bengal state maximum number of species recorded followed by Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu and so on (Figure 1 and Table 1). Among all the families, maximum number of species are recorded under Lycosidae followed by Oxyopidae and Pisauridae (Figure 2, Figure 5 and Table 1). Only seventy-six species are recorded from other countries i.e. almost 69.35% fauna are endemic to India. Eight species are known only from the Karakorum (in original literatures). Exact distribution of 11 species are unknown (* marked) viz. exact distribution -299- World Scientific News 47(2) (2016) 298-317 within India: Anahita smythiesi Simon, of Ctenidae; Arctosa lesserti Reimoser, Geolycosa carli (Reimoser) of Lycosidae; Oxyopes indicus (Walckenaer) and Peucetia elegans (Blackwall) of Oxyopidae; Euprosthenops ellioti (O. P.-Cambridge), Nilus phipsoni (F. O. P. Cambridge) and Perenethis dentifasciata (O. P. Cambridge) of Pisauridae and Psechrus ghecuanus Thorell, P. himalayanus Simon and P. torvus (O. P. Cambridge) of Psechridae. Arctosa lesserti Reimoser and Geolycosa carli (Reimoser) (possibly Tamil Nadu) of Lycosidae were recorded from South India whereas Anahita smythiesi Simon (either Uttarakhand or Maharashtra) of Ctenidae and Hippasa partita (O. P. Cambridge) (either Gujarat or Rajasthan) of Lycosidae from India in original literatures. and Perenethis dentifasciata (O. P. Cambridge) of Pisauridae were recorded from either India or Pakistan. Rests were recorded from India in original literatures. Among all, both the morphs were recorded only in 129 species, while only female, male and juvenile morphs recorded in 126, eight and two species respectively (Figure 4 and Table 1). There are three nomen nudum [viz. Dendrolycosa stauntoni (Pocock), Hygropoda mahendriensis (Vankhede et al.) and Nilus marginatus (Simon) of Pisauridae] which were recorded from India (Jager, 2011; WSC, 2016). Lycosoids are recorded from almost all the states excepting Nagaland and Mizoram while this fauna recorded only two union territories viz. Andaman & Nicobar Islands and Pondicherry. The distribution pattern of primitive spiders clearly shows that from West Bengal, Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra the maximum lycosoid fauna been recorded while from Nagaland, Mizoram, Lakshadweep, Delhi, Chandigarh, Daman & Du and Dadra & Nagar Haveli not been recorded (Figure 5 and Table 1). If we consider the higher taxon like family, all the families are recorded from Andaman & Nicobar Islands and Kerala but not in genus and species level to the extent of West Bengal (Figure 1, Figure 3 and Figure 5). Members of the family Psechridae have been recorded from Andaman & Nicobar Islands and Kerala only (Figure 5 and Table 1). Table 1. Annotated checklist of Lycosoidea so far recorded from India. Distribution Morph Family Genus Species known In India Elsewhere Acantheis Thorell indicus Gravely, 1931 KL, TN Female IND (UK or Anahita Karsch smythiesi Simon, 1897 Both MR) * andamanensis Gravely, AN Female 1931 bomdilaensis Tikader & ARP Both Bhutan Malhotra,1981 CTENIDAE cochinensis Gravely, 1931 KL Both Keyserling Ctenus dangsus Reddy & Patel, GJ Female Walckenaer 1994 goaensis Bastawade & GO Female Borkar, 2008 himalayensis Gravely, WB Both 1931 indicus Gravely, 1931 KL Female -300- World Scientific News 47(2) (2016) 298-317 kapuri Tikader, 1973 AN Female meghalayaensis Tikader, MG Female 1976 narashinhai Patel & AP Female Reddy, 1988 sikkimensis Gravely, 1931 KL, SK, WB Both tuniensis Patel & Reddy, AP Female 1988 Acantholycosa baltoroi (Caporiacco, JK Female Dahl 1935) Agalenocosa subinermis (Simon, 1897) MR Pakistan Both Mello-Leitão himalayensis Tikader & UP, WB Both Malhotra, 1980 indica Tikader & MR, WB China Both Malhotra, 1980 khudiensis (Sinha, 1951) BH China Both lesserti Reimoser, 1934 SI (TN) * Both Arctosa C. L. Koch mulani (Dyal, 1935) MR Pakistan Both quinquedens Dhali et al., WB Female 2012 sandeshkhaliensis WB Both Majumder, 2004 tappaensis Gajbe, 2004 MP Both LYCOSIDAE leucostigma (Simon, 1885) KA, TN Both Sundevall Crocodilosa Caporiacco maindroni Female MR (Simon, 1897) amkhasensis (Tikader & MP, WB Both Malhotra, 1976) atropalpis (Gravely, 1924) TN Sri Lanka Both burasantiensis (Tikader & WB Both Malhotra, 1976) Draposa nicobarica (Thorell, 1891) AN Both Kronestedt TN, GJ, Bangladesh, oakleyi (Gravely, 1924) Both BH, PJ Pakistan porpaensis (Gajbe, 2004) MP Female subhadrae (Patel & Reddy, AP Sri Lanka Both 1993) banarensis Tikader & RJ Both Malhotra, 1980 Evippa Simon jabalpurensis Gajbe, 2004 MP Female -301- World Scientific News 47(2) (2016) 298-317 mandlaensis Gajbe, 2004 MP Female Egypt to India, praelongipes (O. P.- AS, GJ, Pakistan, Both Cambridge, 1870) RJ, PJ Kazakhstan rajasthanea Tikader & RJ Both Malhotra, 1980 rubiginosa Simon, 1885 AS, AP, TN Female shivajii Tikader & MR Both Malhotra, 1980 sohani Tikader & MR Both Malhotra, 1980 solanensis Tikader & HP Female Malhotra, 1980 evippiforme (Caporiacco, Karakorum Both Evippomma 1935) Roewer evippinum (Simon, 1897) MR Pakistan Female Geolycosa carli (Reimoser, 1934) SI (TN) * Both Montgomery KL, TN, MP, agelenoides (Simon, 1884) GO, KA, UK, Taiwan Both MR, WB charamaensis Both MP Gajbe, 2004 fabreae Gajbe & Gajbe, MP Female 1999 flavicoma Caporiacco, Karakorum Juvenile 1935 KL, TN, KA, Bangladesh, greenalliae (Blackwall, MR, OR, SK, Sri Lanka Both 1867) WB, MP hansae Gajbe & Gajbe, Female MP 1999 haryanensis Arora & HR Both Hippasa Simon Monga, 1994 himalayensis Gravely, HP, KA, WB Female 1924 India to holmerae Thorell, 1895 WB, UK, MN,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Checklist of the Non -Acarine Arachnids
    Original Research A CHECKLIST OF THE NON -A C A RINE A R A CHNIDS (CHELICER A T A : AR A CHNID A ) OF THE DE HOOP NA TURE RESERVE , WESTERN CA PE PROVINCE , SOUTH AFRIC A Authors: ABSTRACT Charles R. Haddad1 As part of the South African National Survey of Arachnida (SANSA) in conserved areas, arachnids Ansie S. Dippenaar- were collected in the De Hoop Nature Reserve in the Western Cape Province, South Africa. The Schoeman2 survey was carried out between 1999 and 2007, and consisted of five intensive surveys between Affiliations: two and 12 days in duration. Arachnids were sampled in five broad habitat types, namely fynbos, 1Department of Zoology & wetlands, i.e. De Hoop Vlei, Eucalyptus plantations at Potberg and Cupido’s Kraal, coastal dunes Entomology University of near Koppie Alleen and the intertidal zone at Koppie Alleen. A total of 274 species representing the Free State, five orders, 65 families and 191 determined genera were collected, of which spiders (Araneae) South Africa were the dominant taxon (252 spp., 174 genera, 53 families). The most species rich families collected were the Salticidae (32 spp.), Thomisidae (26 spp.), Gnaphosidae (21 spp.), Araneidae (18 2 Biosystematics: spp.), Theridiidae (16 spp.) and Corinnidae (15 spp.). Notes are provided on the most commonly Arachnology collected arachnids in each habitat. ARC - Plant Protection Research Institute Conservation implications: This study provides valuable baseline data on arachnids conserved South Africa in De Hoop Nature Reserve, which can be used for future assessments of habitat transformation, 2Department of Zoology & alien invasive species and climate change on arachnid biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • An In-Depth Biochemical Analysis of Spider and Silkworm Silk
    Unravelling the secrets of silk: an in-depth biochemical analysis of spider and silkworm silk Hamish Cameron Craig A thesis in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences Evolution and Ecology Research Centre UNSW February 2019 THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES Thesis/Dissertation Sheet Surname or Family name: Craig First name: Hamish Other name/s: Cameron Abbreviation for degree as given in the University calendar: PhD School: School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences Faculty: Faculty of Science Title: Unravelling the secrets of silk: a detailed examination of silk biology and structure Abstract: Silk is a protein-based biopolymer produced by many different invertebrate species from amphipods to spiders. Its incredible material properties, biocompatibility and antimicrobial properties make it one of the most desirable natural fibres in the race for new materials, with major potential impacts in everything from biomedical research to its aerospace applications. Although silk has been studied in detail since the latter part of the 20th century the field is still unable to produce truly comparable synthetics due to the complexity of biological factors involved in influencing silks properties. The major focus of this thesis is examining biological and structural factors that impact silk properties within spiders and silkworms. To examine this, I analysed silk across many scales from phylogenetic trends in amino acid composition and material properties, down to the Nano-scale examining the impacts of molecular structure, pioneering new methods of silk analysis through utilisation of dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (ssNMR) spectroscopy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Road Travelled by Australian Trapdoor Spiders
    Discovered words and photo by Mark Harvey, WA Museum ustralia is home to many unique spiders with most species occurring Anowhere else on Earth. Many have their origins in the distant past, when Australia was part of Gondwana in the Mesozoic, ca. 180 million years ago. Australia, New Zealand, South America, Africa, Madagascar, Antarctica and the Indian sub-continent, plus a few small islands, once formed a massive southern supercontinent known as Gondwana that gradually fragmented from the Jurassic, ca. 180–160 million years ago. Evidence of the connection between these continental blocks can be found in the fossil record The road travelled by Australian of some plants and animals, but most strikingly in the presence of related groups trapdoor spiders of organisms in the modern biota. But back to spiders. There are three major groups of spiders: the Mesothelae (a Australia that lives in shallow burrows with Above An undescribed species of Conothele. group of primitive spiders now only found in a flap-like lid. It was discovered by Adelaide Asia), the Mygalomorphae (trapdoor spiders University PhD student, Sophie Harrison, and their relatives) and the Araneomorphae to be most closely related to spiders of (all other spiders). The Australian the same genus from South Africa. Using timeline of Australia bumping into Asia. mygalomorphs include trapdoor, funnel- molecular sequence data, Sophie found that He also noted that there were two distinct web and mouse spiders, and tarantulas. the spider, Moggridgea rainbowi, diverged habitat preferences for Australian Conothele. Most Australian mygalomorph spiders from its African cousins sometime between Some species built burrows on tree trunks have their origins in Gondwana.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Reproductive Traits Between Two Salt-Marsh Wolf Spiders (Araneae, Lycosidae) Under Different Habitat Suitability Conditions
    Animal Biology 61 (2011) 127–138 brill.nl/ab Comparison of reproductive traits between two salt-marsh wolf spiders (Araneae, Lycosidae) under different habitat suitability conditions Charlène Puzin1, Anthony Acou2, Dries Bonte3 and Julien Pétillon4,∗ 1 Université de Rennes 1, U.R.U. 420 – Biodiversité et Gestion des territoires, U.F.R. SVE, 263 Avenue du Général Leclerc, CS 74205, 35042 Rennes Cedex, France 2 Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, U.M.R. 7208 BOREA – Biologie des Organismes et Ecosystèmes Aquatiques, Station Marine de Dinard, BP 70134, 38 rue du Port Blanc, 35800 Dinard, France 3 Ghent University, Terrestrial Ecology Unit (TEREC), Department of Biology, K. L. Ledeganckstraat 35, 9000 Ghent, Belgium 4 University of Antwerp, Evolutionary Ecology Group, Department of Biology, Groenenborgerlaan 171, 2020 Antwerpen, Belgium Abstract Salt-marsh invasions by the grass Elymus athericus (Poaceae) recently transformed usual areas dom- inated by Atriplex portulacoides (Chenopodiaceae) into homogeneous meadows. Two wolf spider species, Pardosa purbeckensis and Arctosa fulvolineata, show contrasting densities and habitat prefer- ences in salt marshes (respectively dominant and co-dominant ground-living spiders) and oppositely respond to the grass invasion. This allowed us to test whether invasive species that alter habitat struc- ture affect reproduction in addition to previously recorded changes in density. Reproductive traits (female mass, cocoon mass, number and volume of eggs, hatched cocoon as a proxy of reproduc- tion date) were studied in both invaded and natural salt marshes during 2007 and 2008 in the Mont St-Michel Bay (France). In both species, reproductive outputs (cocoon mass) were higher in optimal habitats and volume of eggs was found to be independent from female mass, whereas the latter sig- nificantly influenced the number of eggs.
    [Show full text]
  • Prey of the Jumping Spider Phidippus Johnsoni (Araneae : Salticidae)
    Jackson, R. R . 1977 . Prey of the jumping spider Phidippus johnsoni (Araneae : Salticidae) . J. Arachnol. 5 :145-149 . PREY OF THE JUMPING SPIDER PHIDIPPUS JOHNSONI (ARANEAE : SALTICIDAE) Robert R. Jackson I Zoology Departmen t University of Californi a Berkeley, California 9472 0 ABSTRACT Field data indicate that P. johnsoni is an euryphagous predator, whose diet includes organisms (aphids, ants, opilionids) sometimes considered distasteful to spiders . Other spiders are preyed upon , including conspecifics. Prey size tends to be one quarter to three quarters the size of the predator . INTRODUCTION Since spiders are probably a dominant group of predators of insects (Bristowe, 1941 ; Riechert, 1974; Turnbull, 1973), there is considerable interest in their feeding ecology . Spiders have usually been considered to be euryphagous predators with a stabilizing , rather than regulative, effect on insect populations (Riechert, 1974) . However, informa- tion concerning the prey taken by particular spider species, in the field, is limited . Field studies by Edgar (1969, 1970), Robinson and Robinson (1970) and Turnbull (1960) are especially noteworthy . During the course of a study of the reproductive biology of Phidippus johnsoni (Peckham and Peckham) (Jackson, 1976), occasionally individuals of this species were found in the field holding prey in their chelicerae . Each prey discovered in this way i s listed in Table 1 . In addition, Ken Evans and Charles Griswold, who were familiar wit h this species, recorded observations of P. johnsoni with prey. (Their data are included in Table 1 .) These data came from a variety of habitats in western North America, most o f which have been described elsewhere (Jackson, 1976) .
    [Show full text]
  • The Phylogenetic Distribution of Sphingomyelinase D Activity in Venoms of Haplogyne Spiders
    Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B 135 (2003) 25–33 The phylogenetic distribution of sphingomyelinase D activity in venoms of Haplogyne spiders Greta J. Binford*, Michael A. Wells Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA Received 6 October 2002; received in revised form 8 February 2003; accepted 10 February 2003 Abstract The venoms of Loxosceles spiders cause severe dermonecrotic lesions in human tissues. The venom component sphingomyelinase D (SMD) is a contributor to lesion formation and is unknown elsewhere in the animal kingdom. This study reports comparative analyses of SMD activity and venom composition of select Loxosceles species and representatives of closely related Haplogyne genera. The goal was to identify the phylogenetic group of spiders with SMD and infer the timing of evolutionary origin of this toxin. We also preliminarily characterized variation in molecular masses of venom components in the size range of SMD. SMD activity was detected in all (10) Loxosceles species sampled and two species representing their sister taxon, Sicarius, but not in any other venoms or tissues surveyed. Mass spectrometry analyses indicated that all Loxosceles and Sicarius species surveyed had multiple (at least four to six) molecules in the size range corresponding to known SMD proteins (31–35 kDa), whereas other Haplogynes analyzed had no molecules in this mass range in their venom. This suggests SMD originated in the ancestors of the Loxoscelesy Sicarius lineage. These groups of proteins varied in molecular mass across species with North American Loxosceles having 31–32 kDa, African Loxosceles having 32–33.5 kDa and Sicarius having 32–33 kDa molecules.
    [Show full text]
  • References (The Literature Survey Was Completed in the Spring of 1995)
    References (The literature survey was completed in the Spring of 1995) Abdullah MAR, Abulfatih HA (1995) Predation of Acacia seeds by bruchid beetles and its relation to altitudinal gradient in south-western Saudi Arabia. J Arid Environ 29:99- 105 Abramsky Z, Pinshow B (1989) Changes in foraging effort in two gerbil species with habitat type and intra- and interspecific activity. Oikos 56:43-53 Abramsky Z, Rosenzweig ML, Pins how BP, Brown JS, Kotler BP, Mitchell WA (1990) Habitat selection: an experimental field test with two gerbil species. Ecology 71:2358-2369 Abramsky Z, Shachak M, Subrach A, Brand S, Alfia H (1992) Predator-prey relationships: rodent-snail interaction in the Central Negev Desert ofIsrael. Oikos 65:128-133 Abushama FT (1972) The repugnatorial gland of the grasshopper Poecilocerus hiero­ glyphicus (Klug). J Entomol Ser A Gen EntomoI47:95-100 Abushama FT (1984) Epigeal insects. In: Cloudsley-Thompson JL (ed) Sahara desert (Key environments). Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 129-144 Alexander AJ (1958) On the stridulation of scorpions. Behaviour 12:339-352 Alexander AJ (1960) A note on the evolution of stridulation within the family Scorpioni­ dae. Proc Zool Soc Lond 133:391-399 Alexander RD (1974) The evolution of social behaviour. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 5:325-383 AlthoffDM, Thompson IN (1994) The effects of tail autotomy on survivorship and body growth of Uta stansburiana under conditions of high mortality. Oecologia 100:250- 255 Applin DG, Cloudsley-Thompson JL, Constantinou C (1987) Molecular and physiological mechanisms in chronobiology - their manifestations in the desert ecosystem. J Arid Environ 13:187-197 Arnold EN (1984) Evolutionary aspects of tail shedding in lizards and their relatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Three Poorly Known Arctosa Species from China (Araneae: Lycosidae)
    Zootaxa 3404: 53–68 (2012) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Notes on three poorly known Arctosa species from China (Araneae: Lycosidae) LU-YU WANG1, YURI M. MARUSIK2,3 & ZHI-SHENG ZHANG1,4 1Key Laboratory of Eco-environments in Three Gorges Reservoir Region (Ministry of Education), School of Life Science, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China 2Institute for Biological Problems of the North of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Portovaya Str. 18, 685000 Magadan, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] 3Zoological Museum, University of Turku, FI-20014, Turku, Finland 4Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Three species of the genus Arctosa are revised and their relationship with A. cinerea, the type species of the genus, is dis- cussed. Arctosa binalis Yu & Song, 1988 is a junior synonym of A. depectinata (Bösenberg & Strand, 1906). Males of Arctosa gougu Chen & Song, 1999 and Arctosa vaginalis Yu & Song, 1988 are described for the first time. All specimens examined were collected from the Yunnan Province, China. Morphological illustrations, photos, descriptions and SEM photographs of the male bulbus of all species are given. Stridulatory files on chelicerae in Lycosidae are reported for the first time. Key words: Taxonomy, wolf spiders, morphology, redescription, distribution Introduction The wolf spider genus Arctosa C.L. Koch, 1847 with 171 species (Platnick 2012), is one of the largest genera of Lycosidae. The genus has been relatively well revised in Europe (Lugetti & Tongiorgi 1965), the Nearctic (Dondale and Redner 1983) and Japan (Tanaka 2009). In this genus, 78 species are known from only one sex (16 from males and 62 from females).
    [Show full text]
  • Tarantulas and Social Spiders
    Tarantulas and Social Spiders: A Tale of Sex and Silk by Jonathan Bull BSc (Hons) MSc ICL Thesis Presented to the Institute of Biology of The University of Nottingham in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Nottingham May 2012 DEDICATION To my parents… …because they both said to dedicate it to the other… I dedicate it to both ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost I would like to thank my supervisor Dr Sara Goodacre for her guidance and support. I am also hugely endebted to Dr Keith Spriggs who became my mentor in the field of RNA and without whom my understanding of the field would have been but a fraction of what it is now. Particular thanks go to Professor John Brookfield, an expert in the field of biological statistics and data retrieval. Likewise with Dr Susan Liddell for her proteomics assistance, a truly remarkable individual on par with Professor Brookfield in being able to simplify even the most complex techniques and analyses. Finally, I would really like to thank Janet Beccaloni for her time and resources at the Natural History Museum, London, permitting me access to the collections therein; ten years on and still a delight. Finally, amongst the greats, Alexander ‘Sasha’ Kondrashov… a true inspiration. I would also like to express my gratitude to those who, although may not have directly contributed, should not be forgotten due to their continued assistance and considerate nature: Dr Chris Wade (five straight hours of help was not uncommon!), Sue Buxton (direct to my bench creepy crawlies), Sheila Keeble (ventures and cleans where others dare not), Alice Young (read/checked my thesis and overcame her arachnophobia!) and all those in the Centre for Biomolecular Sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • By the Wandering Spider Ctenus Ornatus (Araneae: Ctenidae) in Southeastern Brazil
    Herpetology Notes, volume 8: 329-330 (2015) (published online on 16 June 2015) Predation on the tropical bullfrog Adenomera marmorata (Anura: Leptodactylidae) by the wandering spider Ctenus ornatus (Araneae: Ctenidae) in southeastern Brazil Lucas Coutinho Amaral¹,*, Pedro de Souza Castanheira², Sergio Potsch de Carvalho-e-Silva¹ and Renner Luiz Cerqueira Baptista² Anurans are common preys to some species of spiders tiny middle eyes and two large posterior eyes (Jocqué (Menin et al., 2005). Not only adults (e.g., Barej et al., and Dippenaar-Schoeman, 2006). Ctenids are nocturnal 2005), but also tadpoles are preyed on by spiders (e.g., hunters, running mainly on the leaf litter. They use mainly Folly et al., 2014a; Luiz et al., 2013). The frog species vibration and visual contact to locate prey, catching and Adenomera marmorata Steindachner, 1867, occurs in killing them with their powerful poison, delivered by the the Atlantic Rain Forest in southeastern Brazil, from fangs of their strong chelicerae (Jocqué and Dippenaar- Rio de Janeiro to Santa Catarina states (Frost, 2015), Schoeman, 2006). Ctenus ornatus (Keyserling, 1877) is and is one of the most abundant amphibian species in a large and very common ground spider in the Atlantic the leaf-litter (Heyer et al., 1990; Rocha et al., 2007). It Forest, distributed from Pernambuco state, in Northeast, is mostly a nocturnal frog, but males can also be heard to Goiás state, in the West, both in Brazil, to Misiones, at anytime of the day during rainy days (Izecksohn and Argentina (Brescovit and Simó, 2007). Carvalho-e-Silva, 2001). Males call from chambers The following event was observed during a dug in the ground, where the females lay their eggs herpetological field work at approximately 07:30 pm embedded in foam nests (Izecksohn and Carvalho-e- on 10 August, 2014, at the Centro Marista São José Silva, 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Mai Po Nature Reserve Management Plan: 2019-2024
    Mai Po Nature Reserve Management Plan: 2019-2024 ©Anthony Sun June 2021 (Mid-term version) Prepared by WWF-Hong Kong Mai Po Nature Reserve Management Plan: 2019-2024 Page | 1 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................... 2 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Regional and Global Context ........................................................................................................................ 8 1.2 Local Biodiversity and Wise Use ................................................................................................................... 9 1.3 Geology and Geological History ................................................................................................................. 10 1.4 Hydrology ................................................................................................................................................... 10 1.5 Climate ....................................................................................................................................................... 10 1.6 Climate Change Impacts ............................................................................................................................. 11 1.7 Biodiversity ................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Spiders 27 November-5 December 2018 Submitted: August 2019 Robert Raven
    Bush Blitz – Namadgi, ACT 27 Nov-5 Dec 2018 Namadgi, ACT Bush Blitz Spiders 27 November-5 December 2018 Submitted: August 2019 Robert Raven Nomenclature and taxonomy used in this report is consistent with: The Australian Faunal Directory (AFD) http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/abrs/online-resources/fauna/afd/home Page 1 of 12 Bush Blitz – Namadgi, ACT 27 Nov-5 Dec 2018 Contents Contents .................................................................................................................................. 2 List of contributors ................................................................................................................... 2 Abstract ................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 4 2. Methods .......................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Site selection ............................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Survey techniques ..................................................................................................... 4 2.2.1 Methods used at standard survey sites ................................................................... 5 2.3 Identifying the collections .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]