DOCSLIB.ORG

Indian Spiders (Arachnida: Araneae): Updated Checklist 2005

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Indian Spiders (Arachnida: Araneae): Updated Checklist 2005 REVIEW ZOOS' PRINT JOURNAL 20(10): 1999-2049 INDIAN SPIDERS (ARACHNIDA: ARANEAE): UPDATED CHECKLIST 2005 Manju Siliwal 1, Sanjay Molur 2,3 and B.K. Biswas 4 1,2 Wildlife Information & Liaison Development (WILD) Society, 3 Zoo Outreach Organisation (ZOO) 29-1, Bharathi Colony, Peelamedu, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641004, India 4 Zoological Survey of India, 'M' Block, New Alipore, Kolkata 700053, India Email: 1 [email protected]; 3 [email protected] ABSTRACT There have been attempts earlier to list the families and the This is the first attempt to update the list of spiders described number of genera under each, such as the one by Patil and formally in India. The list is compiled following Platnick's The Raghavendra (2001) on spiders of Western Ghats. The lists are World Spider Catalog. Extensive search of scientific peer- reviewed publications in the region revealed 40 new species, mostly based on Tikader's checklist. This present checklist is which are not included in Platnick's list. The checklist is an attempt to clarify and standardize spider fauna list in India. compared extensively with Tikader's list. In all, 1442 species of spiders in 59 families have been listed as described formally History of arachnological studies in India from India. Taxonomic verification is recommended for 51 Arachnological studies in India started in the late 19th Century species. Seventy-nine species listed by Tikader do not occur in India. Fifty-three species listed by Dyal and included in with pioneer taxonomists such as Blackwall (1864, 1867), Platnick's list do not occur in India. The paper lists Stoliczka (1869), Thorell (1877), Cambridge (1892, 1897), Simon replacement names, incertae sedis, nomina nuda, nomina (1897a,b), Pocock (1895, 1899a,b, 1900a,b, 1901), and Sherriffs dubia, transfers, synonyms, wrong taxonomic placements, (1919, 1927, 1928, 1929). These taxonomists mostly studied Dyal's species, etc. The checklist is updated up to 15 August preserved specimens. The first spider to be described from 2005. India was Sphasus lepidus Blackwall, 1864 [= Oxyopes lepidus KEYWORDS (Blackwall, 1864)] along with six other spiders (Blackwall, 1864). Arachnida, Araneae, checklist, India, Platnick, review, F.H. Gravely, assistant superintendent of the Government spiders, Tikader Museum in Madras studied spiders in the wild and was the first taxonomist to publish new descriptions in India. His major The current world list of spiders includes nearly 39,000 species work has been on Indian mygalomorphs, mainly the families in over 3600 genera in 110 families (Platnick, 2005: Version 6.0). Theraphosidae and Lycosidae (Gravely, 1915, 1921a,b, 1922, Tikader (1987) in his checklist of Indian spiders compiled a list 1931, 1935a,b). His studies in southern and northeastern India of 1067 species occurring in India. Much of his work was based revealed many new species to science, which are deposited at on published literature and post-independence collections of the Government Museum, Chennai and at the National Museum, the Zoological Survey of India expeditions to different regions. Kolkata. In the same year as Gravely’s first descriptions of His compilation is noteworthy since it provided spider workers spiders from the wild, Karam Narayan, Professor of Biology, St. in India and the neighbouring countries with an accessible John’s College, Agra, described seven new species and one checklist of Indian spiders. Further, Tikader also described subspecies of an ant-like spider (Attidae = Salticidae) from the quite a few species and thereby adding valuable information to Indian Museum Collection, Kolkata (Narayan, 1915). Another the wealth of Indian spider knowledge. After Tikader’s 1987 Indian, S. Dyal (1935) described 45 new species and compiled publication, much of the work carried out by Indian taxonomic notes on 76 species, all from Lahore, but since we arachnologists has been based on his work, including recent are restricting this checklist to the current political boundary of descriptions such as Bastawade (2002) based on Tikader’s India, Dyal’s spiders have been excluded from this list, although description of an allied species from Andaman Island. More many of them are likely to occur in India. Further studies recently, with an increase in spider taxonomy and the hard work confirming their presence on the Indian side is required. of Platnick and his group, the world checklist has provided a new dimension to our knowledge. Platnick's (2005) The World Major contributions to Indian arachnology were made by R.I. Spider Catalog has also provided good insights into Pocock and B.K. Tikader, who were responsible for bringing standardized approaches for understanding spider diversity spider studies to the notice of other researchers. R.I. Pocock, and taxonomy around the world. Although Platnick and his described 112 new species of spiders from India (Pocock, 1895, group are in the process of continuously revising the world 1899a,b, 1900a,b, 1901) before switching to studies of primate spider catalogue, it is up to regional and national spider taxonomy (Pocock, 1928). Many of Pocock’s species taxonomists / systematists to review and revise the existing descriptions have subsequently undergone taxonomic checklists. In this light we took up the task of compiling the revisions. His book in 1900 provided the first list of spiders, Indian spider checklist as part of a bigger task of compiling along with enumeration and new descriptions in British India, such a list for South Asia. We constantly refer to Tikader’s based on the spider specimens at the British Museum, London, work, and the changes shown in the current list are in reference which is widely referred by arachnologists of this region. to his 1987 publication. Pocock described 37 new large-bodied species of the suborder © Zoo Outreach Organisation; www.zoosprint.org Manuscript 1283; Received 09 November 2004; Revised received 20 May 2005; Finally accepted 24 August 2005; Date of publication 21 September 2005 October 2005 | ISSN 0973-2535 (Print edition); 0973-2551 (Online edition) 1999 Indian spiders 2005 checklist M. Siliwal et al. Orthognatha and its infraorder Mygalomorphae (Pocock, 1895, Table 1. Representation of the spider families in India (this 1899a,b, 1900a,b), following which Gravely (1915, 1921b, checklist) and the World (Platnick, 2005) 1935a,b), contributed by adding 15 new species to the existing Families India @ World * Date of list of Mygalomorphae. Identification of mygalomorphs is still # Gen. # Sp. # Gen. # Sp. updation $ based on the descriptions given by these authors. After the 1. Agelenidae 2 10 38 486 21.vii.05 last publication by Gravely in 1935, there have been very few 2. Amaurobiidae 2 4 69 640 21.vii.05 3. Anyphaenidae 1 1 56 508 26.v.05 new mygalomorph spiders reported from India. 4. Araneidae 27 147 167 2831 22.vii.05 5. Atypidae 1133324.x.04 Tikader streamlined and popularized spider studies in India 6. Barychelidae 4 5 44 300 17.v.05 7. Cithaeronidae 222619.xi.02 through his publications, a few of which included identification 8. Clubionidae 3 23 15 532 21.vii.05 keys along with species descriptions for all the genera belonging 9. Corinnidae 9 35 76 924 17.v.05 to six spider families, namely, the Lycosidae, Thomisidae, 10. Cryptothelidae # 1111021.xii.04 11. Ctenidae 2 14 39 455 08.iv.05 Araneidae, Gnaphosidae, Heteropodidae (now Sparassidae) and 12. Ctenizidae 1 1 9 120 19.v.05 Clubionidae (now included in several other families as well as 13. Deinopidae 1145724.xii.03 Clubionidae) (Tikader, 1980; Tikader & Malhotra, 1980; Tikader, 14. Desidae 1 2 38 180 26.vii.05 15. Dictynidae 8 11 48 559 21.vii.05 1982a,b; Sethi & Tikader, 1988; Majumder & Tikader, 1991). 16. Dipluridae 2 4 24 175 24.iii.05 Identification keys provided in these publications are still 17. Eresidae 1 4 10 102 21.vii.05 followed by Indian arachnologists. Tikader (1987) also 18. Filistatidae 3 10 16 109 13.ix.04 19. Gnaphosidae 28 134 115 1954 21.vii.05 published the first comprehensive list of Indian spiders, which 20. Hahniidae 3 4 26 235 21.vii.05 included 1067 species belonging to 249 genera in 43 families. 21. Hersiliidae 3 6 10 143 14.xii.04 22. Hexathelidae 1 1 11 85 20.xii.03 However, several changes have been proposed in the checklist 23. Homalonychidae # 111321.xii.04 including the correct placement of a few genera and species 24. Idiopidae 3 11 20 269 26.v.05 under different families, which are discussed in this paper. 25. Linyphiidae 15 24 569 4307 21.vii.05 26. Liocranidae 1 7 29 159 21.vii.05 Further, new species described and several taxonomic changes 27. Lycosidae 17 126 102 2304 21.vii.05 since Tikader’s publication are incorporated in this present 28. Mimetidae 2 3 12 155 7.ii.05 checklist, which is updated through 15 August 2005. 29. Miturgidae 3 29 26 351 21.vii.05 30. Mysmenidae 1 1 22 91 06.v.05 31. Nemesiidae 1 3 38 329 21.vii.05 The paper provides current valid scientific names of Indian 32. Ochyroceratidae 1 1 13 146 21.xii.03 spiders and is primarily based on The World Spider Catalog 33. Oecobiidae 2 5 6 101 11.xi.04 34. Oonopidae 4 13 67 459 09.ii.05 (Platnick, 2005: Version 6.0). The latest additions that are not 35. Oxyopidae 4 65 9 417 22.vii.05 reflected in the catalog are also given here. The checklist 36. Palpimanidae 2 3 15 127 08.vi.04 includes all the recently described species from India published 37. Philodromidae 7 43 29 516 21.vii.05 38. Pholcidae 4 6 76 874 21.vii.05 in peer-reviewed journals. New descriptions in masters and 39. Pimoidae 1322417.xi.04 doctoral theses, and in proceedings are not included in this 40.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Archiv Für Naturgeschichte
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Archiv für Naturgeschichte Jahr/Year: 1905 Band/Volume: 71-2_2 Autor(en)/Author(s): Lucas Robert Artikel/Article: Arachnida für 1904. 925-993 © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.zobodat.at Arachnida fiir 1904. Bearbeitet von Dr. Robert Lucas. A. Publikationen (Autoren alphabetisch). d'Agostino, A. P. Prima nota dei Ragni deU'Avelliiiese. Avellino 1/8 4 pp. Banks, Nathan (1). Some spiders and mites from Bermuda Islands. Trans. Connect. Acad. vol. XI, 1903 p. 267—275. — {%), The Arachnida of Florida. Proc. Acad. Philad. Jan. 1904 p. 120—147, 2 pls. (VII u. VIII). — (3). Some Arachnida from CaUfornia. Proc. Californ. Acad. III No. 13. p. 331—374, pls. 38—41. — (4). Arachnida (in) Alaska; from the Harriman Alaska Ex- pedition vol. VIII p. 37—45, 11 pls. — Abdruck der Publikation von 1900 aus d. Proc. Washington Acad. vol. II p. 477—486. Berthoumieu, L' Abbe. Revision de l'entomologie dans 1' Antiquite. Arachnides p. 197—200 (Chelifer, Scorpiones, Galeodes, Aranea, Ixodes, Tyroglyphus et Cheyletus). Eev. Sei. Bourbonnais 1904, p. 167. Bolton, H. The Palaeontology of the Lancashire Goal Measures. Manchester. Mus. Owens Coli. Publ. 50. Mus. Handb. p. 378—415. — Abdruck aus Trans. Manchester geol. min. Soc. vol. 28. Brown, Rob. (I). Rectifications tardives mais necessaires. Proc- verb. Soc. Linn. Bordeaux, vol. 59 p. LXVIII—LXX. — Auch über Arachniden. Calman, W. T. Arachnida in Zool. Record for 1903 vol. XL. XI 47 pp. Cambridge, F. 0. Pickard. 1901. Further Contributions towards the Knowledge of the Arachnida of Epping Forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on New and Poorly Known Palaearctic Species of the Genera
    Bull. Br. arachnol. Soc. (2004) 13 (2), 33–40 33 Notes on new and poorly known Palaearctic Stockholm, Sweden (Dr T. Kronestedt); species of the genera Neon, Sitticus and Synageles YMTU=personal collection of Dr Yuri Marusik, (Araneae: Salticidae) temporarily kept in Zoological Museum, Turku University, Finland; ZMTU=Zoological Museum, Dmitri V. Logunov University of Turku, Turku, Finland (Dr S. Koponen); Manchester Museum, ZMUM=Zoological Museum, Moscow State University of Manchester, University, Moscow, Russia (Dr K. G. Mikhailov). Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL Abbreviations used in the text: AME=anterior median eyes, ap=apical, d=dorsal, Fm=femur, Summary Mt=metatarsus, PLE=posterior lateral eyes, pr=prolateral, Pt=patella, rt=retrolateral, Tb=tibia, Two new species are diagnosed, figured and described: v=ventral. The sequence of leg segment measurements is Neon kovblyuki sp. n. (_\; Ukraine: the Crimea) and Synageles persianus sp. n. (_\; Azerbaijan and Iran). The as follows: femur+patella+tibia+metatarsus+tarsus. male of Sitticus rivalis Simon, 1937 is figured for the first For the leg spination the system adopted is that used by time; furthermore, this species is removed from synonymy Ono (1988). All measurements are in mm. with S. striatus Emerton, 1911. Neon pusio Simon, 1937 is synonymised with Neon convolutus Denis, 1937. Neon (Dicroneon) kovblyuki sp. n. (Figs. 1–6) Introduction Types: Holotype _ (ZMUM), Ukraine, the Crimea, Cape Martyan Reserve (44(30#N, 34(15#E), 1–70 m Although the Salticidae of northern and central a.s.l., 10 March 2002, Y. M. Marusik. Paratypes: 4\ Europe are relatively well-known, those from southern (ZMUM), together with holotype.
    [Show full text]
  • Visual Perception in Jumping Spiders (Araneae,Salticidae)
    Visual Perception in Jumping Spiders (Araneae,Salticidae) A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biology at the University of Canterbury by Yinnon Dolev University of Canterbury 2016 Table of Contents Abstract.............................................................................................................................................................................. i Acknowledgments .......................................................................................................................................................... iii Preface ............................................................................................................................................................................. vi Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2: Innate pattern recognition and categorisation in a jumping Spider ........................................................... 9 Abstract ....................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................ 11 Methods .....................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wesołowska W
    Genus Vol. 18(4): 783-786 Wrocław, 28 XII 2007 Papers Celebrating the 80th Birthday of Professor andrzej WarcHałoWski A new species of Langona from South Africa (Araneae: Salticidae: Aelurillinae) Wanda WesołoWska Institute of Zoology, Wrocław University, Sienkiewicza 21, 50-335 Wrocław, Poland e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. Langona warchalowskii n. sp., a new jumping spider from South Africa is described. Key words: arachnology, taxonomy, Salticidae, Langona, new species, Afrotropical Region The genus Langona SIMON, 1901 contains 33 species (Platnick 2007), 17 of them (including the type) were described originally from Africa. Formerly described species are very poorly known. A few of African species were redescribed by Hęciak & Pró- szyński 1983. Recently described African Langona species have good documentation (Hęciak & Prószyński 1983, PrócHnieWicz & Hęciak 1994, WesołoWska & russell- SMITH 2000, WesołoWska 2006). The genus may be separated from other Aelurillinae by toothless inner cheliceral margin. Colouration is not diagnostic, as members of Langona share characteristic stripped pattern with the majority of other Aelurillinae. More reliable characters are visible in the structure of genital organs. The male pedi- palp has only single apophysis acompanied by a bunch of very dense, long and thick setae. Embolus is coiled on tip of tegulum and partially or fully hidden in deep cymbial pocket (cavity between apical part of tegulum and cymbium – see logunov 1996). The epigyne has strongly sclerotized shields in posterior part. They cover copulatory openings. Internal structure of epigyne is rather complicated, but usually well visible accessory glands fall into seminal ducts. Below description of a new species of the genus from Cape Province in South Africa is presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliographie Zur Spinnentierfauna Der Ostdeutschen Bundesländer (Arachnida: Araneae, Opiliones, Pseudoscorpiones) Schluß
    © Entomologische Nachrichten und Berichte;Entomologische download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Nachrichten und Berichte, 36,1992/3 175 P. BLISS, Halle, und P. SACHER, Wittenberg Bibliographie zur Spinnentierfauna der ostdeutschen Bundesländer (Arachnida: Araneae, Opiliones, Pseudoscorpiones) Schluß Summary The German arachnological literature is distributed among the whole range of scientific print-media. As a result of this it has become more and more difficult to consider all relevant information in preparation for further studies, especially faunistic projects. To improve the situation the East-Ger- man Spider Study Group (Arbeitskreis Arachnologie) has published bibliographies since 1982. Three parts have come out till now. They exclusively contain papers with faunistic dates to lay a foundation for a regional fauna. This bibliography will be the last one of the series. All four parts contain 637 references. The authors would be obliged for additional information about literature they have possibly overlooked. Résum é Jusqu’ici on a présenté 3 parts de la bibliographie sur la faune des araignées de l’Allemagne de l’Est. Cette bibliographie est tome 4 et termine la série. En tout, les 4 tomes contiennent 637 titres. 1. Einleitende Bemerkungen Das Vorankommen wurde auch dadurch er­ schwert, daß Publikationen anderer Fachrichtun­ Erklärtes Ziel des im Mai 1978 in der ehemaligen gen zwar mitunter nutzbare Daten enthalten, DDR gegründeten Arbeitskreises Arachnologie diese jedoch schwer zu entdecken sind, weil sich war die Erarbeitung einer Arachnofauna (excl. aus dem jeweiligen Titel kein arachnofaunisti- Acari) für dieses Territorium. Das Vorhaben ließ scher Bezug ableiten läßt. sich nicht in vollem Umfang verwirklichen, weil Voraussetzungen wie Finanzierung, Computer­ Die bemängelte breite Streuung der faunistisch- technik und Kartenmaterial fehlten und zudem ökologischen Informationen auf eine Vielzahl von ausschließlich nebenberuflich gearbeitet wurde.
    [Show full text]
  • Sand Transport and Burrow Construction in Sparassid and Lycosid Spiders
    2017. Journal of Arachnology 45:255–264 Sand transport and burrow construction in sparassid and lycosid spiders Rainer Foelix1, Ingo Rechenberg2, Bruno Erb3, Andrea Alb´ın4 and Anita Aisenberg4: 1Neue Kantonsschule Aarau, Biology Department, Electron Microscopy Unit, Zelgli, CH-5000 Aarau, Switzerland. Email: [email protected]; 2Technische Universita¨t Berlin, Bionik & Evolutionstechnik, Sekr. ACK 1, Ackerstrasse 71-76, D-13355 Berlin, Germany; 3Kilbigstrasse 15, CH-5018 Erlinsbach, Switzerland; 4Laboratorio de Etolog´ıa, Ecolog´ıa y Evolucio´n, Instituto de Investigaciones Biolo´gicas Clemente Estable, Avenida Italia 3318, CP 11600, Montevideo, Uruguay Abstract. A desert-living spider sparassid (Cebrennus rechenbergi Ja¨ger, 2014) and several lycosid spiders (Evippomma rechenbergi Bayer, Foelix & Alderweireldt 2017, Allocosa senex (Mello-Leita˜o, 1945), Geolycosa missouriensis (Banks, 1895)) were studied with respect to their burrow construction. These spiders face the problem of how to transport dry sand and how to achieve a stable vertical tube. Cebrunnus rechenbergi and A. senex have long bristles on their palps and chelicerae which form a carrying basket (psammophore). Small balls of sand grains are formed at the bottom of a tube and carried to the burrow entrance, where they are dispersed. Psammophores are known in desert ants, but this is the first report in desert spiders. Evippomma rechenbergi has no psammophore but carries sand by using a few sticky threads from the spinnerets; it glues the loose sand grains together, grasps the silk/sand bundle and carries it to the outside. Although C. rechenbergi and E. rechenbergi live in the same environment, they employ different methods to carry sand.
    [Show full text]
  • Spider Biodiversity Patterns and Their Conservation in the Azorean
    Systematics and Biodiversity 6 (2): 249–282 Issued 6 June 2008 doi:10.1017/S1477200008002648 Printed in the United Kingdom C The Natural History Museum ∗ Paulo A.V. Borges1 & Joerg Wunderlich2 Spider biodiversity patterns and their 1Azorean Biodiversity Group, Departamento de Ciˆencias conservation in the Azorean archipelago, Agr´arias, CITA-A, Universidade dos Ac¸ores. Campus de Angra, with descriptions of new species Terra-Ch˜a; Angra do Hero´ısmo – 9700-851 – Terceira (Ac¸ores); Portugal. Email: [email protected] 2Oberer H¨auselbergweg 24, Abstract In this contribution, we report on patterns of spider species diversity of 69493 Hirschberg, Germany. the Azores, based on recently standardised sampling protocols in different hab- Email: joergwunderlich@ t-online.de itats of this geologically young and isolated volcanic archipelago. A total of 122 species is investigated, including eight new species, eight new records for the submitted December 2005 Azorean islands and 61 previously known species, with 131 new records for indi- accepted November 2006 vidual islands. Biodiversity patterns are investigated, namely patterns of range size distribution for endemics and non-endemics, habitat distribution patterns, island similarity in species composition and the estimation of species richness for the Azores. Newly described species are: Oonopidae – Orchestina furcillata Wunderlich; Linyphiidae: Linyphiinae – Porrhomma borgesi Wunderlich; Turinyphia cavernicola Wunderlich; Linyphiidae: Micronetinae – Agyneta depigmentata Wunderlich; Linyph- iidae:
    [Show full text]
  • A Summary List of Fossil Spiders
    A summary list of fossil spiders compiled by Jason A. Dunlop (Berlin), David Penney (Manchester) & Denise Jekel (Berlin) Suggested citation: Dunlop, J. A., Penney, D. & Jekel, D. 2010. A summary list of fossil spiders. In Platnick, N. I. (ed.) The world spider catalog, version 10.5. American Museum of Natural History, online at http://research.amnh.org/entomology/spiders/catalog/index.html Last udated: 10.12.2009 INTRODUCTION Fossil spiders have not been fully cataloged since Bonnet’s Bibliographia Araneorum and are not included in the current Catalog. Since Bonnet’s time there has been considerable progress in our understanding of the spider fossil record and numerous new taxa have been described. As part of a larger project to catalog the diversity of fossil arachnids and their relatives, our aim here is to offer a summary list of the known fossil spiders in their current systematic position; as a first step towards the eventual goal of combining fossil and Recent data within a single arachnological resource. To integrate our data as smoothly as possible with standards used for living spiders, our list follows the names and sequence of families adopted in the Catalog. For this reason some of the family groupings proposed in Wunderlich’s (2004, 2008) monographs of amber and copal spiders are not reflected here, and we encourage the reader to consult these studies for details and alternative opinions. Extinct families have been inserted in the position which we hope best reflects their probable affinities. Genus and species names were compiled from established lists and cross-referenced against the primary literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa, Araneae, Agelenidae, Agelena
    Zootaxa 1021: 45–63 (2005) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA 1021 Copyright © 2005 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) On Agelena labyrinthica (Clerck, 1757) and some allied species, with descriptions of two new species of the genus Agelena from China (Araneae: Agelenidae) ZHI-SHENG ZHANG1,2*, MING-SHENG ZHU1** & DA-XIANG SONG1*** 1. College of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China; 2. Baoding Teachers College, Baoding, Hebei 071051, P. R. China; *[email protected], **[email protected] (Corresponding author), ***[email protected] Abstract Seven allied species of the funnel-weaver spider genus Agelena Walckenaer, 1805, including the type species Agelena labyrinthica (Clerck, 1757), known to occur in Asia and Europe, are reviewed on the basis of the similarity of genital structures. Two new species are described: Agelena chayu sp. nov. and Agelena cuspidata sp. nov. The specific name A. silvatica Oliger, 1983 is revalidated. The female is newly described for A. injuria Fox, 1936. Two specific names are newly synony- mized: Agelena daoxianensis Peng, Gong et Kim, 1996 with A. silvatica Oliger, 1983, and A. sub- limbata Wang, 1991 with A. limbata Thorell, 1897. Some names are proposed for these species to represent some particular genital structures: conductor ventral apophysis, conductor median apo- physis, conductor distal apophysis and conductor dorsal apophysis for male palp and spermathecal head, spermathecal stalk, spermathecal base and spermathecal apophysis for female epigynum. Key words: genital structure, revalidation, synonym, review, taxonomy Introduction The funnel-weaver spider genus Agelena was erected by Walckenaer (1805) with the type species Araneus labyrinthicus Clerck, 1757.
    [Show full text]
  • Westring, 1871) (Schorsmuisspin) JANSSEN & CREVECOEUR (2008) Citeerden Deze Soort Voor Het Eerst in België
    Nieuwsbr. Belg. Arachnol. Ver. (2009),24(1-3): 1 Jean-Pierre Maelfait 1 juni 1951 – 6 februari 2009 Nieuwsbr. Belg. Arachnol. Ver. (2009),24(1-3): 2 In memoriam JEAN-PIERRE MAELFAIT Kortrijk 01/06/1951 Gent 06/02/2009 Jean-Pierre Maelfait is ons ontvallen op 6 februari van dit jaar. We brengen hulde aan een man die veel gegeven heeft voor de arachnologie in het algemeen en meer specifiek voor onze vereniging. Jean-Pierre is altijd een belangrijke pion geweest in het bestaan van ARABEL. Hij was medestichter van de “Werkgroep ARABEL” in 1976 en op zijn aanraden werd gestart met het publiceren van de “Nieuwsbrief” in 1986, het jaar waarin ook ARABEL een officiële vzw werd. Hij is eindredacteur van de “Nieuwsbrief” geweest van 1990 tot en met 2002. Sinds het ontstaan van onze vereniging is Jean-Pierre achtereenvolgens penningmeester geweest van 1986 tot en met 1989, ondervoorzitter van 1990 tot en met 1995 om uiteindelijk voorzitter te worden van 1996 tot en met 1999. Pas in 2003 gaf hij zijn fakkel als bestuurslid over aan de “jeugd”. Dit afscheid is des te erger omdat Jean- Pierre er na 6 jaar afwezigheid terug een lap ging op geven, door opnieuw bestuurslid te worden in 2009 en aldus verkozen werd als Secretaris. Alle artikels in dit nummer opgenomen worden naar hem opgedragen. Jean-Pierre Maelfait nous a quitté le 6 février de cette année. Nous rendons hommage à un homme qui a beaucoup donné dans sa vie pour l’arachnologie en général et plus particulièrement pour Arabel. Jean-Pierre a toujours été un pion important dans la vie de notre Société.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Behavioral Ecology Symposium ’96: Cushing 165 MYRMECOMORPHY AND MYRMECOPHILY IN SPIDERS: A REVIEW PAULA E. CUSHING The College of Wooster Biology Department 931 College Street Wooster, Ohio 44691 ABSTRACT Myrmecomorphs are arthropods that have evolved a morphological resemblance to ants. Myrmecophiles are arthropods that live in or near ant nests and are considered true symbionts. The literature and natural history information about spider myrme- comorphs and myrmecophiles are reviewed. Myrmecomorphy in spiders is generally considered a type of Batesian mimicry in which spiders are gaining protection from predators through their resemblance to aggressive or unpalatable ants. Selection pressure from spider predators and eggsac parasites may trigger greater integration into ant colonies among myrmecophilic spiders. Key Words: Araneae, symbiont, ant-mimicry, ant-associates RESUMEN Los mirmecomorfos son artrópodos que han evolucionado desarrollando una seme- janza morfológica a las hormigas. Los Myrmecófilos son artrópodos que viven dentro o cerca de nidos de hormigas y se consideran verdaderos simbiontes. Ha sido evaluado la literatura e información de historia natural acerca de las arañas mirmecomorfas y mirmecófilas . El myrmecomorfismo en las arañas es generalmente considerado un tipo de mimetismo Batesiano en el cual las arañas están protegiéndose de sus depre- dadores a través de su semejanza con hormigas agresivas o no apetecibles. La presión de selección de los depredadores de arañas y de parásitos de su saco ovopositor pueden inducir una mayor integración de las arañas mirmecófílas hacia las colonias de hor- migas. Myrmecomorphs and myrmecophiles are arthropods that have evolved some level of association with ants. Myrmecomorphs were originally referred to as myrmecoids by Donisthorpe (1927) and are defined as arthropods that mimic ants morphologically and/or behaviorally.
    [Show full text]
  • Mendelova Univerzita V Brně
    MENDELOVA UNIVERZITA V BRNĚ LESNICKÁ A DŘEVAŘSKÁ FAKULTA ÚSTAV OCHRANY LESŮ A MYSLIVOSTI Epigeická fauna v požářišti revíru Bzenec (LS Strážnice) Bakalářská práce Vedoucí práce: Vypracoval: PROF. ING. EMANUEL KULA, CSC. JAKUB PRÁGR Brno 2015 Prohlašuji, že jsem práci: Epigeická fauna v požářišti revíru Bzenec (LS Strážnice) zpracoval samostatně a veškeré použité prameny a informace uvádím v seznamu použité literatury. Souhlasím, aby moje práce byla zveřejněna v souladu s § 47b Zákona č. 111/1998 Sb., o vysokých školách ve znění pozdějších předpisů a v souladu s platnou Směrnicí o zveřejňování vysokoškolských závěrečných prací. Jsem si vědom, že se na moji práci vztahuje zákon č. 121/2000 Sb., autorský zákon, a že Mendelova univerzita v Brně má právo na uzavření licenční smlouvy a užití této práce jako školního díla podle §60 odst. 1 autorského zákona. Dále se zavazuji, že před sepsáním licenční smlouvy o využití díla jinou osobou (subjektem) si vyžádám písemné stanovisko univerzity, že předmětná licenční smlouva není v rozporu s oprávněnými zájmy univerzity a zavazuji se uhradit případný příspěvek na úhradu nákladu spojených se vznikem díla, a to až do jejich skutečné výše. V Brně, dne: Podpis studenta: Poděkování Na tomto místě bych rád vyjádřil srdečné poděkování všem, kteří mne v průběhu studia podporovali a ochotně pomáhali. V prvé řadě děkuji svému vedoucímu prof. Ing. Emanuelu Kulovi, CSc. za jeho vstřícné jednání, odborné vedení, cenné rady, četné připomínky a návrhy v průběhu celého zpracování této bakalářské práce. Bez jeho pomoci by tato práce nevznikla. Velký dík patří mojí rodině a přátelům za jejich bezmeznou podporu, shovívavost a trpělivost v průběhu celého studia i při psaní této práce.
    [Show full text]