DOCSLIB.ORG

Visual Perception in Jumping Spiders (Araneae,Salticidae)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Visual Perception in Jumping Spiders (Araneae,Salticidae) Visual Perception in Jumping Spiders (Araneae,Salticidae) A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biology at the University of Canterbury by Yinnon Dolev University of Canterbury 2016 Table of Contents Abstract.............................................................................................................................................................................. i Acknowledgments .......................................................................................................................................................... iii Preface ............................................................................................................................................................................. vi Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2: Innate pattern recognition and categorisation in a jumping Spider ........................................................... 9 Abstract ....................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................ 11 Methods ...................................................................................................................................................................... 13 General .................................................................................................................................................................... 13 Stimuli ..................................................................................................................................................................... 13 Do jumping spiders view abstract images of prey elements as prey? .................................................................... 15 Do jumping spiders view abstract images as their preferred prey? ....................................................................... 19 Data Analysis ........................................................................................................................................................... 19 Results ......................................................................................................................................................................... 19 Do jumping spiders view abstract images of prey elements as prey? .................................................................... 19 Do jumping spiders view abstract images as their preferred prey? ....................................................................... 22 Discussion .................................................................................................................................................................... 23 References .................................................................................................................................................................. 26 Chapter 3: Biological relevance affects object recognition in jumping spiders .......................................................... 29 Abstract ....................................................................................................................................................................... 30 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................ 31 Methods ...................................................................................................................................................................... 33 General .................................................................................................................................................................... 33 Multi-choice experiment ......................................................................................................................................... 35 Two-choice test ....................................................................................................................................................... 36 Data Analysis ........................................................................................................................................................... 37 Results ......................................................................................................................................................................... 38 Discussion .................................................................................................................................................................... 42 References .................................................................................................................................................................. 45 Chapter 4: Retinal image scanning and active vision in jumping spiders .................................................................... 47 Abstract ....................................................................................................................................................................... 48 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................ 49 Methods ...................................................................................................................................................................... 53 Results ......................................................................................................................................................................... 55 Scanning frame analysis ......................................................................................................................................... 56 Within species comparisons of scanning distance ................................................................................................. 57 Within stimulus comparisons of scanning distance ............................................................................................... 57 Bar .......................................................................................................................................................................... 57 Square .................................................................................................................................................................... 59 Circle ....................................................................................................................................................................... 59 Two circles ............................................................................................................................................................... 62 Eyes ........................................................................................................................................................................ 62 Salticid ..................................................................................................................................................................... 65 Within species comparisons across stimuli ............................................................................................................. 67 Discussion .................................................................................................................................................................... 72 References .................................................................................................................................................................. 75 Chapter 5: Expectations and reality: The effects of visual priming on retinal scanning motion ................................ 78 Abstract ....................................................................................................................................................................... 79 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................ 80 Methods ...................................................................................................................................................................... 83 Results ......................................................................................................................................................................... 87 Discussion .................................................................................................................................................................... 99 References ................................................................................................................................................................ 104 Chapter 6: Out of its depth: A reassessment of salticid visual depth judgements ................................................... 107 Abstract ..................................................................................................................................................................... 108 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Checklist of the Non -Acarine Arachnids
    Original Research A CHECKLIST OF THE NON -A C A RINE A R A CHNIDS (CHELICER A T A : AR A CHNID A ) OF THE DE HOOP NA TURE RESERVE , WESTERN CA PE PROVINCE , SOUTH AFRIC A Authors: ABSTRACT Charles R. Haddad1 As part of the South African National Survey of Arachnida (SANSA) in conserved areas, arachnids Ansie S. Dippenaar- were collected in the De Hoop Nature Reserve in the Western Cape Province, South Africa. The Schoeman2 survey was carried out between 1999 and 2007, and consisted of five intensive surveys between Affiliations: two and 12 days in duration. Arachnids were sampled in five broad habitat types, namely fynbos, 1Department of Zoology & wetlands, i.e. De Hoop Vlei, Eucalyptus plantations at Potberg and Cupido’s Kraal, coastal dunes Entomology University of near Koppie Alleen and the intertidal zone at Koppie Alleen. A total of 274 species representing the Free State, five orders, 65 families and 191 determined genera were collected, of which spiders (Araneae) South Africa were the dominant taxon (252 spp., 174 genera, 53 families). The most species rich families collected were the Salticidae (32 spp.), Thomisidae (26 spp.), Gnaphosidae (21 spp.), Araneidae (18 2 Biosystematics: spp.), Theridiidae (16 spp.) and Corinnidae (15 spp.). Notes are provided on the most commonly Arachnology collected arachnids in each habitat. ARC - Plant Protection Research Institute Conservation implications: This study provides valuable baseline data on arachnids conserved South Africa in De Hoop Nature Reserve, which can be used for future assessments of habitat transformation, 2Department of Zoology & alien invasive species and climate change on arachnid biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Phylogeny, Divergence Times and Biogeography of Spiders of the Subfamily Euophryinae (Araneae: Salticidae) ⇑ Jun-Xia Zhang A, , Wayne P
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 68 (2013) 81–92 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Molec ular Phylo genetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Molecular phylogeny, divergence times and biogeography of spiders of the subfamily Euophryinae (Araneae: Salticidae) ⇑ Jun-Xia Zhang a, , Wayne P. Maddison a,b a Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4 b Department of Botany and Beaty Biodiversity Museum, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4 article info abstract Article history: We investigate phylogenetic relationships of the jumping spider subfamily Euophryinae, diverse in spe- Received 10 August 2012 cies and genera in both the Old World and New World. DNA sequence data of four gene regions (nuclear: Revised 17 February 2013 28S, Actin 5C; mitochondrial: 16S-ND1, COI) were collected from 263 jumping spider species. The molec- Accepted 13 March 2013 ular phylogeny obtained by Bayesian, likelihood and parsimony methods strongly supports the mono- Available online 28 March 2013 phyly of a Euophryinae re-delimited to include 85 genera. Diolenius and its relatives are shown to be euophryines. Euophryines from different continental regions generally form separate clades on the phy- Keywords: logeny, with few cases of mixture. Known fossils of jumping spiders were used to calibrate a divergence Phylogeny time analysis, which suggests most divergences of euophryines were after the Eocene. Given the diver- Temporal divergence Biogeography gence times, several intercontinental dispersal event sare required to explain the distribution of euophry- Intercontinental dispersal ines. Early transitions of continental distribution between the Old and New World may have been Euophryinae facilitated by the Antarctic land bridge, which euophryines may have been uniquely able to exploit Diolenius because of their apparent cold tolerance.
    [Show full text]
  • How Blood-Derived Odor Influences Mate-Choice Decisions by a Mosquito-Eating Predator
    How blood-derived odor influences mate-choice decisions by a mosquito-eating predator Fiona R. Crossa, Robert R. Jacksona,b, and Simon D. Pollardc,1 aSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand; bInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, Thomas Odhiambo Campus, P.O. Box 30, Mbita Point, 40305 Kenya; and cCanterbury Museum, Rolleston Avenue, Christchurch 8013, New Zealand Edited by Hans R. Herren, Millennium Institute, Arlington, VA, and approved September 29, 2009 (received for review April 14, 2009) Evarcha culicivora (Araneae, Salticidae) feeds indirectly on vertebrate nate between the lake fly and the bloodcarrying mosquito by blood by choosing, as preferred prey, bloodcarrying female mosqui- sight and by olfaction (6). toes. Mutual mate-choice behavior is also pronounced in this species. Evarcha culicivora also identifies opposite-sex conspecific Here we show that, when E. culicivora feeds indirectly on blood, it individuals (i.e., potential mates) not only by sight but also by acquires a diet-related odor that makes it more attractive to the odor (7, 17). Here we consider whether there is a link between opposite sex. The mate-choice decisions of the adults of both sexes this predator’s unusual diet and its mate-choice decisions, our were investigated in a series of experiments based on comparing how hypothesis being that, by feeding on bloodcarrying mosquitoes, long the test spider remained close to the odor of one source spider E. culicivora acquires an odor (or ‘perfume’) that is preferred by on one day and to the odor of a different source spider on the potential mates.
    [Show full text]
  • Evarcha Culicivora Chooses Blood-Fed Anopheles Mosquitoes but Other
    MVE mve˙986 Dispatch: October 6, 2011 Journal: MVE CE: Hybrid-CE View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE Journal Name Manuscript No. B Author Received: No of pages: 3 TS: Suresh provided by UC Research Repository Medical and Veterinary Entomology (2011), doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2011.00986.x 1 1 2 SHORT COMMUNICATION 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 Evarcha culicivora chooses blood-fed Anopheles 6 7 7 8 mosquitoes but other East African jumping spiders do 8 9 9 10 not 10 11 11 12 12 13 R. R. J A C K S O N1,2 andX.J.NELSON1 13 14 14 AQ1 1 2 15 Department of Xxx, School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand and Department of 15 16AQ2 Xxx, International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, Mbita Point, Kenya 16 17 17 18 18 19 Abstract. Previous research using computer animation and lures made from dead 19 20 prey has demonstrated that the East African salticid Evarcha culicivora Wesolowska & 20 21AQ3 Jackson (Araneae: Salticidae) feeds indirectly on vertebrate blood by actively choosing 21 22 blood-carrying female mosquitoes as prey, and also that it singles out mosquitoes of 22 23AQ4 the genus Anopheles (Diptera: Culicidae) by preference. Here, we demonstrate that 23 24 E. culicivora’s preference is expressed when the species is tested with living prey 24 25 and that it is unique to E. culicivora. As an alternative hypothesis, we considered 25 26 26 the possibility that the preference for blood-fed female anopheline mosquitoes might 27 27 28 be widespread in East African salticids.
    [Show full text]
  • Sexual Selection Research on Spiders: Progress and Biases
    Biol. Rev. (2005), 80, pp. 363–385. f Cambridge Philosophical Society 363 doi:10.1017/S1464793104006700 Printed in the United Kingdom Sexual selection research on spiders: progress and biases Bernhard A. Huber* Zoological Research Institute and Museum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany (Received 7 June 2004; revised 25 November 2004; accepted 29 November 2004) ABSTRACT The renaissance of interest in sexual selection during the last decades has fuelled an extraordinary increase of scientific papers on the subject in spiders. Research has focused both on the process of sexual selection itself, for example on the signals and various modalities involved, and on the patterns, that is the outcome of mate choice and competition depending on certain parameters. Sexual selection has most clearly been demonstrated in cases involving visual and acoustical signals but most spiders are myopic and mute, relying rather on vibrations, chemical and tactile stimuli. This review argues that research has been biased towards modalities that are relatively easily accessible to the human observer. Circumstantial and comparative evidence indicates that sexual selection working via substrate-borne vibrations and tactile as well as chemical stimuli may be common and widespread in spiders. Pattern-oriented research has focused on several phenomena for which spiders offer excellent model objects, like sexual size dimorphism, nuptial feeding, sexual cannibalism, and sperm competition. The accumulating evidence argues for a highly complex set of explanations for seemingly uniform patterns like size dimorphism and sexual cannibalism. Sexual selection appears involved as well as natural selection and mechanisms that are adaptive in other contexts only. Sperm competition has resulted in a plethora of morpho- logical and behavioural adaptations, and simplistic models like those linking reproductive morphology with behaviour and sperm priority patterns in a straightforward way are being replaced by complex models involving an array of parameters.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on New and Poorly Known Palaearctic Species of the Genera
    Bull. Br. arachnol. Soc. (2004) 13 (2), 33–40 33 Notes on new and poorly known Palaearctic Stockholm, Sweden (Dr T. Kronestedt); species of the genera Neon, Sitticus and Synageles YMTU=personal collection of Dr Yuri Marusik, (Araneae: Salticidae) temporarily kept in Zoological Museum, Turku University, Finland; ZMTU=Zoological Museum, Dmitri V. Logunov University of Turku, Turku, Finland (Dr S. Koponen); Manchester Museum, ZMUM=Zoological Museum, Moscow State University of Manchester, University, Moscow, Russia (Dr K. G. Mikhailov). Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL Abbreviations used in the text: AME=anterior median eyes, ap=apical, d=dorsal, Fm=femur, Summary Mt=metatarsus, PLE=posterior lateral eyes, pr=prolateral, Pt=patella, rt=retrolateral, Tb=tibia, Two new species are diagnosed, figured and described: v=ventral. The sequence of leg segment measurements is Neon kovblyuki sp. n. (_\; Ukraine: the Crimea) and Synageles persianus sp. n. (_\; Azerbaijan and Iran). The as follows: femur+patella+tibia+metatarsus+tarsus. male of Sitticus rivalis Simon, 1937 is figured for the first For the leg spination the system adopted is that used by time; furthermore, this species is removed from synonymy Ono (1988). All measurements are in mm. with S. striatus Emerton, 1911. Neon pusio Simon, 1937 is synonymised with Neon convolutus Denis, 1937. Neon (Dicroneon) kovblyuki sp. n. (Figs. 1–6) Introduction Types: Holotype _ (ZMUM), Ukraine, the Crimea, Cape Martyan Reserve (44(30#N, 34(15#E), 1–70 m Although the Salticidae of northern and central a.s.l., 10 March 2002, Y. M. Marusik. Paratypes: 4\ Europe are relatively well-known, those from southern (ZMUM), together with holotype.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Removal Or Reduced Density of the Malaria Mosquito, Anopheles
    Medical and Veterinary Entomology (2018), doi: 10.1111/mve.12327 REVIEW ARTICLE Effects of the removal or reduction in density of the malaria mosquito, Anopheles gambiae s.l., on interacting predators and competitors in local ecosystems C. M. COLLINS1 , J. A. S. BONDS2, M. M. QUINLAN1 and J. D. MUMFORD1 1Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, London, U.K. and 2Bonds Consulting Group LLC, Panama City Beach, Florida, U.S.A. Abstract. New genetic control methods for mosquitoes may reduce vector species without direct effects on other species or the physical environment common with insecticides or drainage. Effects on predators and competitors could, however, be a concern as Anopheles gambiae s.l. is preyed upon in all life stages. We overview the literature and assess the strength of the ecological interactions identified. Most predators identified consume many other insect species and there is no evidence that anyspecies preys exclusively on any anopheline mosquito. There is one predatory species with a specialisation on blood-fed mosquitoes including An. gambiae s.l.. Evarcha culicivora is a jumping spider, known as the vampire spider, found around Lake Victoria. There is no evidence that these salticids require Anopheles mosquitoes and will readily consume blood-fed Culex. Interspecific competition studies focus on other mosquitoes of larval habitats. Many of these take place in artificial cosms and give contrasting results to semi-field studies. This may limit their extrapolation regarding the potential impact of reduced An. gambiae numbers. Previous mosquito control interventions are informative and identify competitive release and niche opportunism; so while the identity and relative abundance of the species present may change, the biomass available to predators may not.
    [Show full text]
  • Speculative Hunting by an Araneophagic Salticid Spider
    SPECULATIVE HUNTINGBY ANARANEOPHAGICSAL TICID SPIDER by ROBERT J.CLARK , DUANE P.HARLAND and ROBERT R.JACKSON 1,2) (Departmentof Zoology,University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand) (Acc.3-VII-2000) Summary Portia mbriata ,anaraneophagic jumping spider ( Salticidae),makes undirected leaps ( er- raticleaping with no particulartarget being evident) in the presence of chemicalcues from Jacksonoidesqueenslandicus ,anothersalticid and a commonprey of P. mbriata. Whether undirectedleaping by P. mbriata functionsas hunting by speculation is investigatedexperi- mentally.Our rsthypothesis, that undirected leaps provoke movement by J.queenslandicus , wasinvestigated using living P. mbriata andthree types of luresmade from dead, dry arthro- pods (P. mbriata, J.queenslandicus and Muscadomestica ).When a living P. mbriata made undirectedleaps or aspring-drivendevice made the lures suddenly move up and down, sim- ulatingundirected leaping, J.queenslandicus respondedby wavingits palps and starting to walk.There was no statisticalevidence that the species from which the lure was made in u- enced J.queenslandicus ’responsein these tests. Our second hypothesis, that J.queenslandi- cus revealsits location to P. mbriata bymoving, was investigated by recording P. mbriata’s reaction to J.queenslandicus when J.queenslandicus reactedto luressimulating undirected leaping.In these tests, P. mbriata respondedby turning toward J.queenslandicus and waving its palps. Keywords: Portia mbriata , Jacksonoidesqueenslandicus ,jumpingspiders, predation, spec- ulativehunting. 1) Correspondingauthor; e-mail address: [email protected] 2) WethankPhil T aylorand David Blest for useful discussion and valuable comments on the manuscript.Financial support was provided by theNational Science Foundation ( GrantBNS 861078)and the Marsden Fund of New Zealand(Grant UOC512). c KoninklijkeBrill NV ,Leiden,2000 Behaviour137, 1601-1612 ® 1602 CLARK, HARLAND&JACKSON Introduction Ageneralproblem facing predators is howto locate prey(Curio, 1976).
    [Show full text]
  • Prey of the Jumping Spider Phidippus Johnsoni (Araneae : Salticidae)
    Jackson, R. R . 1977 . Prey of the jumping spider Phidippus johnsoni (Araneae : Salticidae) . J. Arachnol. 5 :145-149 . PREY OF THE JUMPING SPIDER PHIDIPPUS JOHNSONI (ARANEAE : SALTICIDAE) Robert R. Jackson I Zoology Departmen t University of Californi a Berkeley, California 9472 0 ABSTRACT Field data indicate that P. johnsoni is an euryphagous predator, whose diet includes organisms (aphids, ants, opilionids) sometimes considered distasteful to spiders . Other spiders are preyed upon , including conspecifics. Prey size tends to be one quarter to three quarters the size of the predator . INTRODUCTION Since spiders are probably a dominant group of predators of insects (Bristowe, 1941 ; Riechert, 1974; Turnbull, 1973), there is considerable interest in their feeding ecology . Spiders have usually been considered to be euryphagous predators with a stabilizing , rather than regulative, effect on insect populations (Riechert, 1974) . However, informa- tion concerning the prey taken by particular spider species, in the field, is limited . Field studies by Edgar (1969, 1970), Robinson and Robinson (1970) and Turnbull (1960) are especially noteworthy . During the course of a study of the reproductive biology of Phidippus johnsoni (Peckham and Peckham) (Jackson, 1976), occasionally individuals of this species were found in the field holding prey in their chelicerae . Each prey discovered in this way i s listed in Table 1 . In addition, Ken Evans and Charles Griswold, who were familiar wit h this species, recorded observations of P. johnsoni with prey. (Their data are included in Table 1 .) These data came from a variety of habitats in western North America, most o f which have been described elsewhere (Jackson, 1976) .
    [Show full text]
  • Wesołowska W
    Genus Vol. 18(4): 783-786 Wrocław, 28 XII 2007 Papers Celebrating the 80th Birthday of Professor andrzej WarcHałoWski A new species of Langona from South Africa (Araneae: Salticidae: Aelurillinae) Wanda WesołoWska Institute of Zoology, Wrocław University, Sienkiewicza 21, 50-335 Wrocław, Poland e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. Langona warchalowskii n. sp., a new jumping spider from South Africa is described. Key words: arachnology, taxonomy, Salticidae, Langona, new species, Afrotropical Region The genus Langona SIMON, 1901 contains 33 species (Platnick 2007), 17 of them (including the type) were described originally from Africa. Formerly described species are very poorly known. A few of African species were redescribed by Hęciak & Pró- szyński 1983. Recently described African Langona species have good documentation (Hęciak & Prószyński 1983, PrócHnieWicz & Hęciak 1994, WesołoWska & russell- SMITH 2000, WesołoWska 2006). The genus may be separated from other Aelurillinae by toothless inner cheliceral margin. Colouration is not diagnostic, as members of Langona share characteristic stripped pattern with the majority of other Aelurillinae. More reliable characters are visible in the structure of genital organs. The male pedi- palp has only single apophysis acompanied by a bunch of very dense, long and thick setae. Embolus is coiled on tip of tegulum and partially or fully hidden in deep cymbial pocket (cavity between apical part of tegulum and cymbium – see logunov 1996). The epigyne has strongly sclerotized shields in posterior part. They cover copulatory openings. Internal structure of epigyne is rather complicated, but usually well visible accessory glands fall into seminal ducts. Below description of a new species of the genus from Cape Province in South Africa is presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Review Cover Image: Hedgehog by Keith Kirk
    Dumfries & Galloway Wildlife Review Cover Image: Hedgehog by Keith Kirk. Keith is a former Dumfries & Galloway Council ranger and now helps to run Nocturnal Wildlife Tours based in Castle Douglas. The tours use a specially prepared night tours vehicle, complete with external mounted thermal camera and internal viewing screens. Each participant also has their own state- of-the-art thermal imaging device to use for the duration of the tour. This allows participants to detect animals as small as rabbits at up to 300 metres away or get close enough to see Badgers and Roe Deer going about their nightly routine without them knowing you’re there. For further information visit www.wildlifetours.co.uk email [email protected] or telephone 07483 131791 Contributing photographers p2 Small White butterfly © Ian Findlay, p4 Colvend coast ©Mark Pollitt, p5 Bittersweet © northeastwildlife.co.uk, Wildflower grassland ©Mark Pollitt, p6 Oblong Woodsia planting © National Trust for Scotland, Oblong Woodsia © Chris Miles, p8 Birdwatching © castigatio/Shutterstock, p9 Hedgehog in grass © northeastwildlife.co.uk, Hedgehog in leaves © Mark Bridger/Shutterstock, Hedgehog dropping © northeastwildlife.co.uk, p10 Cetacean watch at Mull of Galloway © DGERC, p11 Common Carder Bee © Bob Fitzsimmons, p12 Black Grouse confrontation © Sergey Uryadnikov/Shutterstock, p13 Black Grouse male ©Sergey Uryadnikov/Shutterstock, Female Black Grouse in flight © northeastwildlife.co.uk, Common Pipistrelle bat © Steven Farhall/ Shutterstock, p14 White Ermine © Mark Pollitt,
    [Show full text]
  • Abundance and Community Composition of Arboreal Spiders: the Relative Importance of Habitat Structure
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Juraj Halaj for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Entomology presented on May 6, 1996. Title: Abundance and Community Composition of Arboreal Spiders: The Relative Importance of Habitat Structure. Prey Availability and Competition. Abstract approved: Redacted for Privacy _ John D. Lattin, Darrell W. Ross This work examined the importance of structural complexity of habitat, availability of prey, and competition with ants as factors influencing the abundance and community composition of arboreal spiders in western Oregon. In 1993, I compared the spider communities of several host-tree species which have different branch structure. I also assessed the importance of several habitat variables as predictors of spider abundance and diversity on and among individual tree species. The greatest abundance and species richness of spiders per 1-m-long branch tips were found on structurally more complex tree species, including Douglas-fir, Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirbel) Franco and noble fir, Abies procera Rehder. Spider densities, species richness and diversity positively correlated with the amount of foliage, branch twigs and prey densities on individual tree species. The amount of branch twigs alone explained almost 70% of the variation in the total spider abundance across five tree species. In 1994, I experimentally tested the importance of needle density and branching complexity of Douglas-fir branches on the abundance and community structure of spiders and their potential prey organisms. This was accomplished by either removing needles, by thinning branches or by tying branches. Tying branches resulted in a significant increase in the abundance of spiders and their prey. Densities of spiders and their prey were reduced by removal of needles and thinning.
    [Show full text]