DOCSLIB.ORG

Country Policy Analysis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Country Policy Analysis Country Policy Analysis Nutrition Impact of Agriculture and Food Systems Nepal November 2013 UN System Standing Committee on Nutrition country study for the second International Conference on Nutrition 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The country assessment for nutrition sensitive agriculture in Nepal was led by Jessica Fanzo (Columbia University), Mr. Raj Kumar Pokharel (Child Health Division Nepal), and Danielle Andrews (UCLA School of Public Health) and supported by Dr. Senendra Upreti (Child Health Division, Nepal). The team received technical assistance and advisement from Mr. Ashok Butyral and Mr. Ramesh Bastola (WHO, Nepal). Lina Mahy and Marzella Wüstefeld (UNSCN, Switzerland) ensured overall coordination of the country case study. This report was possible thanks to the sponsorship by the German Government. TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements............................................................................................................................2 Abbreviations ....................................................................................................................................5 I. Executive Summary .........................................................................................................................6 II. Purpose of Study and Research ..................................................................................................... 13 III. Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 14 3.1 Background: Nutrition sensitive agriculture and food systems ................................................................. 14 3.2 Situation analysis ........................................................................................................................................................... 16 3.2.1 Nutrition situation ........................................................................................................................................................ 1 7 3.2.2 Dietary transition .......................................................................................................................................................... 21 3.2.3 Agriculture and food security situation .................................................. ........................................................... 23 3.3 National nutrition priorities ...................................................................................................................................... 32 IV. Methods ..................................................................................................................................... 33 4.1 Data collection and sources of information ........................................................................................................ 33 4.2 Data analysis .................................................................................................................................................................... 35 V. Findings ....................................................................................................................................... 36 5.1 Description of the relevant food and agriculture policies and plans ........................................................ 36 5.1.1 Description of the major food and agriculture Policies .................................................. ........................... 36 5.1.2 Secondary policies ........................................................................................................................................................ 4 8 5.2 Analysis of the nutrition-sensitivity of the policies and frameworks ...................................................... 52 5.2.1 Analysis of the major food and agriculture policies and plans .................................................. ............ 52 5.2.2 Analysis of secondary policies .................................................. .............................................................................. 61 5.3 Unintended consequences on nutrition outcomes ........................................................................................... 63 5.4 A Funding of and implementation of nutrition-sensitive agriculture and food plans ....................... 67 5.4.1 Funding .................................................. ............................................................................................................................. 67 5.4.2 Implementation and capacity.................................................................................................................................. 69 3 5.5 Policy processes and alignments ............................................................................................................................. 75 5.5.1 Cross sectoral coordination ..................................................................................................................................... 75 5.5.2 Sustainability ................................................................................................................................................................... 77 5.5.3 Use of terminology .................................................. ...................................................................................................... 7 7 5.6 Analysis of monitoring and evaluation approach in the policies ............................................................... 78 VI. Conclusions ................................................................................................................................. 81 6.1 Nutrition-sensitive analysis of nepal’s food and agriculture policies ...................................................... 81 6.2 Recommendations and knowledge gaps .............................................................................................................. 83 VIII. References ................................................................................................................................ 87 IX. Annexes ...................................................................................................................................... 91 Annex 1: Persons Interviewed and Focus Groups .................................................................................................. 91 Annex 2: Interview Guide ................................................................................................................................................... 93 Annex 3: Guiding Principles of Nutrition Sensitive Agriculture......................................................................... 96 Annex 4: On-going Programmes in Nepal ................................................................................................................... 9 8 Annex 5: Terms of Reference for Nepal case study ............................................................................................. 101 4 ABBREVIATIONS ADS Agriculture Development Strategy, Nepal CBS Central Bureau of Statistics, Nepal CMR Child Mortality Rate (under 5 years of age) DDC District Development Committee DHO District Health Offices DLS Department of Livestock Services DoA Department of Agriculture DoHS Department of Health Services FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations FNSP Food and Nutrition Security Plan of Action, Nepal GoN Government of Nepal IFPRI International Food Policy Research Institute IIDS Institute for Integrated Development Studies IMR Infant Mortality Rate MoAD Ministry of Agriculture and Development, Nepal MoE Ministry of Education, Nepal MoFALD Ministry of Federal Affairs and Local Development MoF Ministry of Finance, Nepal MoHP Ministry of Health and Population, Nepal MoUD Ministry of Urban Development MSNP Multi-Sectoral Nutrition Plan, Nepal NAGA Nutrition Assessment and Gap Analysis, Nepal NARC Nepal Agriculture Research Council NDHS Nepal Demographic Health Survey NLSS Nepal Living Standards Survey NFSCC Nutrition and Food Security Coordination Committee MSNP Nepal Multi-Sectoral Nutrition Plan NPC National Planning Commission, Nepal UN United Nations UNICEF United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund UNSCN United Nations Standing Committee on Nutrition USAID United States Agency for International Development WB World Bank WFP World Food Programme WHO World Health Organization 5 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Nepal is on track to achieve its Millennium Development Goal (MDG) to reduce the prevalence of underweight children ages 6-59 months to 29% by 2015 (National Planning Commission, 2010a). Furthermore, Nepal has shown significant improvement in both its Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) and Under 5 Child Mortality Rate (CMR), which serve as indicators of the country’s overall health status. Additionally, the prevalence of childhood stunting decreased by 14% from the period 2001 to 2006 and further declined by 16% between the years of 2006 and 2011 (NDHS). Also, the percentage of underweight children declined by 9% between 2001 and 2006 and 26% between 2006 and 2011; however, despite significant improvement in recent years, Nepal’s rates of chronic undernutrition remain high in comparison to similar low-income developing nations. Currently, about 41% of children under five are stunted, and although the prevalence of child acute undernutrition or wasting decreased by 15% in the period 2006 to 2011, this measurement is still high by global standards and remains at a critical
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Logistics Capacity Assessment Nepal
    IA LCA – Nepal 2009 Version 1.05 Logistics Capacity Assessment Nepal Country Name Nepal Official Name Federal Democratic Republic of Nepal Regional Bureau Bangkok, Thailand Assessment Assessment Date: From 16 October 2009 To: 6 November 2009 Name of the assessors Rich Moseanko – World Vision International John Jung – World Vision International Rajendra Kumar Lal – World Food Programme, Nepal Country Office Title/position Email contact At HQ: [email protected] 1/105 IA LCA – Nepal 2009 Version 1.05 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Country Profile....................................................................................................................................................................3 1.1. Introduction / Background.........................................................................................................................................5 1.2. Humanitarian Background ........................................................................................................................................6 1.3. National Regulatory Departments/Bureau and Quality Control/Relevant Laboratories ......................................16 1.4. Customs Information...............................................................................................................................................18 2. Logistics Infrastructure .....................................................................................................................................................33 2.1. Port Assessment .....................................................................................................................................................33
    [Show full text]
  • The Right to Adequate Food in Nepal
    Parallel Information: The Right to Adequate Food in Nepal Article 11, ICESCR FIAN Nepal August 2014, Kathmandu Imprint Published by: FIAN Nepal Kupondole, Lalitpur, P. O. Box: 11363 Nepal email: [email protected] Website: http://www.fiannepal.org FIAN International Willy-Brandt-Platz 5 69115 Heidelberg, Germany Email: [email protected] http://www.fian.org Edited by: Yubraj Koirala, Dip Magar, Basanta Adhikari, Sarba Raj Khadka, Tilak Adhikari, Ana Maria Suarez Franco, Sabine Pabst, Alison Graham Layout: Suman Piya Cover photo: A woman with a baby in her back, assisted by another girl are busy plucking up tender leaves/buds from a stinging nettle plant. People in some parts of Nepal, mainly in the rural areas of hills, depend on these types of neglected plant resources that are grown naturally in and around the agricultural lands, wasted lands, close to water sources and forest areas. Photo by: Rajendra Kumar Basnet Kindly supported by Misereor and Bread for the World Parallel Information The Right to Adequate Food in Nepal (Article 11, ICESCR) FIAN Nepal August 2014, Kathmandu Parallel Information: The right to adequate food in Nepal, (Article 11, ICESCR) ii Abbreviations ADS : Agriculture Development Strategy AVR : Antiretroviral CBS : Central Bureau of Statistics CESCR : Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights CEDAW : Committee on Elimination of Discrimination against Women CSO : Civil Society Organisations DAO : District Administration Office DFID : Department of International Development DANIDA : Danish International Development
    [Show full text]
  • Nepali Times
    #110 6 - 12 September 2002 16 pages Rs 20 OOOne year later by Daniel Lak p4 OUROUR OUR DOUBLEDOUBLE DOUBLE TRIANGLETRIANGLE TRIANGLE p8-9 ANALYSIS by ○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○ RAJENDRA DAHAL he two protagonists in the present crisis—the extreme right and the T extreme left—want the same thing: an extension of the emergency, and neither side No one won, everyone lost cares too much for elections. The constitution Nepalis have never before faced such has provided polls as a way out of this zero, unemployment is rife. They have lost military might alone is not going to be enough stalemate, but they are not going to let the deprivation and insecurity. purchasing power, markets, food supply, health to finish off the Maoists. The idea is to put people vote. ○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○ services, education, and personal security. sufficient pressure on them to bolster the That is the paradox of Nepal’s politics: use Article 127 to amend the constitution and Caught between the ruthlessness of the bargaining position in future talks. And this is the enemies seem to want the same result. And take necessary powers. The resignation shows Maoists and counter-attacks from security also the intention of the Maoists who have they are pitted against parliamentary parties that political regression may not be as easy as forces, Nepalis have never before faced such already begun their senseless mayhem in the and Nepalis who haven’t given up on the rightists want. deprivation and insecurity. run-up to the 16 September strike. democracy. There are signs the extreme Given this undercurrent, it doesn’t seem to An alternative to elections would be On the political front, Deuba has played right is now more royal than the king, and matter anymore which faction of the Congress postponed elections.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Utilization Practices, Beliefs and Taboos in Nepal an Overview
    FOOD UTILIZATION PRACTICES, BELIEFS AND TABOOS IN NEPAL AN OVERVIEW MAY 2010 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Ramesh Kant Adhikari through the Global Health Technical Assistance Project. FOOD UTILIZATION PRACTICES, BELIEFS AND TABOOS IN NEPAL AN OVERVIEW DISCLAIMER The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. This document (Report No. 10-01-367) is available in print or online. Online documents can be located in the GH Tech website library at www.ghtechproject.com/resources\. Documents are also available through the Development Experience Clearinghouse (www.dec.org). Additional information can be obtained from: The Global Health Technical Assistance Project 1250 Eye St., NW, Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20005 Tel: (202) 521-1900 Fax: (202) 521-1901 [email protected] This document was submitted by The QED Group, LLC, with CAMRIS International and Social & Scientific Systems, Inc., to the United States Agency for International Development under USAID Contract No. GHS-I-00-05-00005-00. CONTENTS ACRONYMS ..................................................................................................................... iii INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 METHODOLOGY .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6 Sustainable Poverty Alleviation and Mountain Development in Nepal: Status, Experience and Strategy
    Chapter 6 Sustainable Poverty Alleviation and Mountain Development in Nepal: Status, Experience and Strategy HARI K. UPADHYAYA Executive Chairman Centre for Environmental and Agricultural Policy Research Extension and Development (CEAPRED), Kathmandu 6.1 General Overview of the Economy Physical and demographic features Nepal stands in sharp contrast to other countries of the Hindu Kush-Himalayan (HKH) region with respect to its geophysical make-up and development potentials, constraints, and priorities. Physically stretching 880 km from east to west and 150-200 km from north to south, Nepal is a small country occupying a land area of about 147,000 sq.km. Despite its size, it is an extremely diverse country covering within its narrow width a wide range of ecological belts: most distinctly, the flat plains of the ‘Terai’, the slopey terrain of the middle hills, and the snowy peaks of the mountains. Accordingly, the climatic conditions vary greatly, ranging from warm tropical in the south to cold temperate in the north. The religious and linguistic divisions also tend to follow the ecological divisions. The mountain population is dominated by the Tibeto-Burman speaking, largely Buddhist groups, the hill population by the Nepali speaking Hindu groups, and the Terai population by the Indo-Aryan Hindu groups, mainly speaking Maithili and Bhojpuri. Nepali is the national language, but some 35 other languages and dialects are also spoken. The caste and ethnic compositions are of marked diversity; the population is divided into more than 65 different groups based on caste and ethnicity. 195 Untitled-4 195 7/19/2007, 1:07 PM Nepal’s population is currently projected at close to 23 million.
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal Country Strategic Plan (2019–2023)
    Executive Board Second regular session Rome, 26–29 November 2018 Distribution: General Agenda item 8 Date: 7 November 2018 WFP/EB.2/2018/8-A/7* Original: English Operational matters – Country strategic plans * Reissued for technical reasons on For approval 20 November 2018 Executive Board documents are available on WFP’s website (https://executiveboard.wfp.org). Nepal country strategic plan (2019–2023) Duration January 2019–December 2023 Total cost to WFP USD 126,000,000 Gender and age marker* 3 * http://gender.manuals.wfp.org/en/gender-toolkit/gender-in-programming/gender-and-age-marker/. Executive summary In spite of significant progress in reducing poverty over the last two decades, geographic and socioeconomic exclusion continue to limit opportunities for disadvantaged groups. A long period of political transition, with 27 governments in the past 28 years, and frequent natural disasters have impeded achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals. A zero hunger strategic review in 2017–2018 highlighted serious food insecurity and malnutrition and outlined recommendations to address them. Nepal’s 2015 constitution restructured the country as a federal democratic republic, starting a new era and providing an opportunity for progress towards the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Every citizen's right to food is enshrined in the Right to Food Act. The aim is to include Strategic Development Goal 2 targets in national policies, budgets and subnational plans and hence improve the coherence of related actions in targeted areas. Focal points: Mr D. Kaatrud Ms P. Bradford Regional Director Country Director Asia and the Pacific email: [email protected] email: [email protected] World Food Programme, Via Cesare Giulio Viola, 68/70, 00148 Rome, Italy WFP/EB.2/2018/8-A/7 2 WFP’s country strategic plan reflects the zero hunger strategic review recommendations to achieve zero hunger by 2030: it is designed to align with the new federal structure and the constitutional right to food.
    [Show full text]
  • Nepali Times
    VIEW POINT #18 24 - 30 November 20 pages Rs 20 CARS, CARS, CARS 10-12 EXCLUSIVE DEADLOCK CONSTITUTION TINKERING In two more weeks it looks like we’ll be where we were two weeks ago. BINOD BHATTARAI Hotel owners and unions are ○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○ Heavyweight lefties: Jhala Nath Khanal, K.P. Sharma Oli and Madhav Kumar Nepal engaged in nasty sabre-rattling. The he week after Maoist leader Baburam owners say no way they’ll give in to t Bhattarai spelt out his groups demand union demands for a 10 percent to scrap the 1990 Constitution, service charge, and claim privately everyone from the left to the right wants to they’d rather announce a lockout. tinker with the ten-year-old document. Unions are equally uncompromis- Even the main opposition Communist Party ing. of Nepal-Unified Marxist-Leninist (UML) Having agreed to postpone their couldnt resist it, and the central committee agitation on 19 November, hotel came up with a number of reasons why ten employees will now wear black arm- years of democracy have failed to deliver. bands to work starting 7 December, The conclusion reached by the UML is: it is and then launch an indefinite strike not inept politicians, not poor leadership, from 12 December. Unions have not bad governance, not even corruption; rejected the mediation panel formed democracy has failed because we have a bad by the government saying they were constitution. “tricked” into postponing their strike. But do we? More and more, it looks Hotel owners say they’ll agree to any like the entire debate on the left of the decision made by government political spectrum has been hijacked by the mediators, but would also like to Maoists violent campaign to overthrow the amend the labour laws which they constitutional monarchy.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in Nepal
    Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in Nepal A Civil Society Parallel Report Review Period: April 2007 – July 2013 Submitted to Pre-Sessional Working Group United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Geneva, Switzerland October 2013 Prepared by: ESCR Committee Human Rights Treaty Monitoring Coordination Centre (HRTMCC) Nepal ESCR Committee Coordinator Rural Reconstruction Nepal (RRN) A Civil Society Report on ESCR, 2013, Nepal Overall coordination: Human Rights Treaty Monitoring Coordination Centre (HRTMCC) Secretariat/INSEC Parallel report process coordination: Community Self Reliance Centre (CSRC) Draft contributors: Mr Jagat Basnet, HRTMCC ESCR Committee, CSRC Mr Birendra Adhikari, HRTMCC ESCR Committee, RRN Ms Samjah Shrestha, HRTMCC Secretariat/INSEC Special contributors: Ms Bidhya Chapagain Mr Prakash Gnyawali Committee on ESCR: Coordinator: Rural Reconstruction Nepal (RRN) Members: Lumanti Collective Campaign for Peace (COCAP) Public Health Concern Trust (PHECT) Physician for Social Responsibility, Nepal (PSRN) Community Self Reliance Centre (CSRC) Forest Resources Studies and Action Team (Forest Action) Centre for Protection of Law and Environment (CELP) © ESCR Committee, HRTMCC, 2013, Nepal The Human Rights Treaty Monitoring Coordination Centre (HRTMCC) is a coalition of 63 human rights organizations, functioning as a joint forum for all human rights NGOs in Nepal. It monitors and disseminates information on the status of state obligations to the UN human rights treaties in the form of parallel reports as well as other publications. HRTMCC is also active in domestic lobbying for the protection and promotion of human rights. HRTMCC has previously submitted parallel reports to the UN treaty bodies monitoring CERD, CAT, ICESCR, CEDAW as well as the ICCPR. Materials from this report can be reproduced, republished and circulated with due acknowledgement of the source.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Zero Hunger in Nepal a Strategic Review of Food Security & Nutrition 2018 2 Towards Zero Hunger in Nepal a Strategic Review of Food Security and Nutrition
    GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL NATIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION KATHMANDU TOWARDS ZERO HUNGER IN NEPAL A STRATEGIC REVIEW OF FOOD SECURITY & NUTRITION 2018 2 TOWARDS ZERO HUNGER IN NEPAL A STRATEGIC REVIEW OF FOOD SECURITY AND NUTRITION GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL NAT IONAL PLANNING COMMISSION KATHMANDU TOWARDS ZERO HUNGER IN NEPAL TOWARDS ZERO HUNGER IN NEPAL A STRATEGIC REVIEW OF FOOD SECURITY & NUTRITION A Strategic Review of Food Security and Nutrition 2018 2018 Published by: Government of Nepal National Planning Commission Singha Durbar, Kathmandu Tel: (+977)-014211013 Fax: (+977)-014211700 Email: [email protected] Web: www.npc.gov.np Copyright: National Planning Commission, 2018 Parts of this publication can be reproduced with prior permission. Inputs were provided by the technical teams of NARMA Consultancy Private Limited and Johns Hopkins University. All photos by WFP Nepal and NARMA Consultancy Private Limited. Recommended citation: NPC (2018), Towards Zero Hunger in Nepal. A Strategic Review of Food Security & Nutrition 2018. Kathmandu: National Planning Commission Design & Print Process: TheSquare, www.thesquare.agency Printed in Nepal. GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL NAT IONAL PLANNING COMMISSION KATHMANDU TOWARDS ZERO HUNGER IN NEPAL A STRATEGIC REVIEW OF FOOD SECURITY & NUTRITION 2018 ii GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL Ministry of Health and Population KATHMANDU, NEPAL DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER MINISTER FOR HEALTH AND POPULATION Message Malnutrition is a major public health problem in of governance to all spheres of government. It developing countries. The impact of malnutrition on gives us an opportunity to systematically work in women, children and adolescent brings long-term improving hygienic nutrition situation in Nepal. and irrevocable physical and intellectual weaknesses, While agricultural-led growth and driving down and impaired growth and development.
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal Aushadhi Limited Address: Babarmahal, Kathmandu Liason Office: Babarmahal, Kathmandu Telephone No
    Government of Nepal Ministry of Finance Singhdurbar, Kathmandu (Unofficial Translation) Annual Performance Review of Public Enterprise - 2018 Government of Nepal Ministry of Finance FOREWORD Public Enterprises are established in Nepal mainly for providing basic goods and services with ease access to the public at a fair price while maintaining a healthy competition in the delivery of such goods and services. They have been playing an important role in controlling the market monopoly, reducing artificial shortage, fair distribution of essential goods and service as well as expanding access to financial facilities. While reviewing their overall performance for the past five years, most of the financial and administrative indicators appear to be mixed. Although the overall income status of 37 Public Enterprises i.e., in operation is improving, the government has been bearing the administrative costs of some Public Enterprises through additional loan investment, as they were unable to earn even operating expenses. In particular, Public Enterprises have not been performing well enough as expected due to failure in keeping the operational expenses and management cost within certain limits, burgeoning unfunded liabilities, incapable to adopt the major principles of professionalism and market management skillfully, limited management autonomy, and a lack of effective accountability system. The role of Public Enterprises is significant in building welfare state and promoting the path towards socialism. They are noteworthy in realizing the highest wises of Nepalese people -"Prosperous Nepal, Happy Nepali"- adopted by the Government of Nepal. Therefore, the past reform initiatives have been observed as ineffective to address the problems of Public Enterprise management in order to increase its managerial and financial efficiency.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    FINAL REPORT Inter Provincial Dependency for Agricultural Development Submitted to Ministry of Agriculture, Land Management and Cooperative Department of Agriculture Harihar Bhawan, Lalitpur, Nepal Submitted by Development Vision Nepal P. Ltd. (DVN), Dhumbarahi-4, Kathmandu July, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I CHAPTER I: BACKGROUND 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.2 OBJECTIVE OF THE ASSIGNMENT 2 1.3 SCOPE OF THE ASSIGNMENT 2 CHAPTER II: APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY 4 2.1 INCEPTION REPORT PREPARATION AND APPROVAL 4 2.2 COLLECTION AND REVIEW OF SECONDARY INFORMATION 4 2.3 SOURCE OF DATA 4 2.4 DESK REVIEW 4 2.5 FIELD WORK 4 2.6 DESIGN OF DATA COLLECTION INSTRUMENTS 5 2.7 DATA ANALYSIS AND REPORTING: 5 2.8 REPORT PREPARATION 5 CHAPTER III: STUDY FINDINGS 7 3.1 DESK REVIEW 7 3.1.1 CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISION FOR AGRICULTURE SECTOR 7 3.1.2 AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT IN NEPAL 14 3.2 FIELD RESEARCH FINDINGS 31 3.2.1 POLICY, PROGRAMS AND FUTURE DIRECTION OF THE PROVINCES 32 3.2.2 KEY COMMODITIES AND PROVINCIAL INTERDEPENDENCY 41 3.2.3 PROVINCIAL INTERDEPENDENCY FOR INPUT SUPPLY 48 3.2.4 KEY SERVICE DELIVERY INSTITUTION AND THEIR ROLES 48 CHAPTER IV: CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 51 4.1 CONCLUSION 51 4.2 RECOMMENDATIONS 56 REFERENCES 58 ANNEXES 59 Acknowledgements Department of Agriculture (DoA), entrusted Development Vision Nepal P. Ltd. (DVN) in carrying out the study entitled "Inter Provincial Dependency for Agricultural Development ". The study concentrated on all seven provinces of the country with special focus on provincial agriculture ministries and agencies related to agricultural development.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    py r | l'lllJ Document of The World Bank FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Public Disclosure Authorized Report No. P-1883-NEP REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE OF TIIE Public Disclosure Authorized PRESIDENT INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION TO THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS ON A PROPOSED CREDIT TO THE Public Disclosure Authorized KINGDOM OF NEPAL FOR THE BHAIRAWA -LUMBINI GROUNDWATER PROJECT June 23, 1976 Public Disclosure Authorized This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. CURRENCY EQUIVALENT US$1 = NRs 12.50 NR1 US$0.0800 NRs 100,000 = US$8,000 NRs 1,000,000 = US$80,000 FISCAL YEAR Nepal Fiscal Year - July 16 to July 15 PRINCIPAL ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ADBN = Agricultural Development Bank of Nepal AIC = Agricultural '[nputs Corporation DA = Department of Agriculture DIHM = Department of Irrigation, Hydrology and Meteorology GDP = Gross Domestic Product GRDB = Groundwater Resources Development Board RIC = His Majesty's Government of Nepal MFAI = Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Irrigation NEC = Nepal Electricity Corporation NFC = Nepal Food Corporation NZIDB = Narayani Zone Irrigation Development Board O&M = Operation and Maintenance PCC = Project Coord[nating Committee PM = Project Manager INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE PRESIDENT TO THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS ON A PROPOSED CREDIT TO THE KINGDOM OF NEPAL FOR THE BHAIRAWA-LUMBINI GROUNDWATER PROJECT 1. I submit the following report and recommendation on a proposed development credit to the Kingdom of Nepal for the equivalent of US$9.0 mil- lion on standard IDA terms to help finance a groundwater irrigation project in the Lumbini Zone near Bhairawa.
    [Show full text]