DOCSLIB.ORG

Capital Finance Board Workshop EXHIBITS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Capital Finance Board Workshop EXHIBITS Capital Finance Board Workshop EXHIBITS April 21, 2014 Exhibit List 2014 Board Capital Finance Workshop April 21, 2014 Pages 1 through 36, the Capital Finance Board Workshop Memo, can be found on the District’s website at: http://www.ebparks.org/meetings EXHIBIT LIST 1: 2013 Grant Funds Received by Matching or Leveraged by AA and WW ..........................39 2a: Active Projects – 2014 Budget .......................................................................................................41 2b: 2014 Active Projects by Department ...........................................................................................58 3a: Measure WW Appropriations as of March 4, 2014 .................................................................59 3b: Measure WW Remaining Balances Sorted by Park...................................................................66 3c: Measure WW Detailed Allocation Area Balances ....................................................................69 3d: Measure WW Local Grant Program Projects by Agency..................................................... 108 3e: Measure WW 2014 Local Grant Program Project Applications ........................................ 131 4: Measure AA Remaining Unappropriated Funds by Metro Area ......................................... 137 5a: Measure CC "Report Card" ........................................................................................................ 139 5b: Measure CC 2015 Budget ............................................................................................................ 160 5c: Park Operating Budget Changes by Metro Area .................................................................... 170 6a: 2014 Active, Applied, Awarded, Close Out or Pending Grants ......................................... 177 6b: FEMA 2006 Storm Damage Projects ......................................................................................... 193 6c: 2013 Grants Funding Received ................................................................................................... 203 7a: Major Infrastructure Renovation and Replacement (Fund 553) Appropriations ............. 209 7b: Paving Inventory ............................................................................................................................. 211 7c: Bridges/Piers/Docks Inventory .................................................................................................... 213 7d: Water Utilities Inventory ............................................................................................................. 228 7e: Building/Structure Inventory ........................................................................................................ 235 8: 2012 Promissory Notes, Facility Replacement and Renovation .......................................... 259 9a: Pipeline 2015 ................................................................................................................................... 263 9b: Staffing History by Location, 2001 through 2014 ................................................................... 270 -37- PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK -38- Exhibit 1 2013 Grant Funds Received by Matching or Leveraged by Exhibit 1 AA and WW Grant Funding Provided to District (or into Escrow) LOCATION SOURCE AMOUNT ACQUISITION CARQUINEZ STRAIT CA COASTAL CONSERVANCY 500,000 (TXI, PHASE II) CONCORD NAVAL WEAPONS ECCC HABITAT CONSERVANCY 166,500 STATION (ALAIMO) MORGAN TERRITORY ECCC HABITAT CONSERVANCY 1,134,400 (ADRIENNE GALVIN) Acquisition Subtotal, 2013 $1,800,900 DEVELOPMENT BIG BREAK CA DEPT. OF PARK & RECREATION 2,500,000 CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION CONTRA COSTA TRAILS 100,480 AUTHORITY CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION CONTRA COSTA TRAILS 24,798 AUTHORITY CROWN BEACH CA WATER RESOURCE 34,698 DISTRICT WIDE CALTRANS 1,528,320 DISTRICT WIDE BAY AREA USAI 88,180 DISTRICT WIDE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 7,928 EASTHSORE CA COASTAL CONSERVANCY 100,000 GARIN EAST BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION 18,295 CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION IRON HORSE REGIONAL TRAIL 39,800 AUTHORITY Development Subtotal, 2013 $4,442,498 TOTAL $6,243,398 -39- PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK -40- Exhibit 2 Active Projects - 2014 Budget Exhibit 2a Remaining Location Description Project* Total Budget Managed By Budget 1 Alameda Shoreline (Naval Stn) Restore Beach Dunes 100200 147,017 99,864 Stewardship 2 Alameda Shoreline (Naval Stn) Develop Public Access 129400 414,840 34,190 Design & Construction 3 Alameda Shoreline (Naval Stn) Alameda Naval Air Station 209200 20,000 166 Land 4 Alamo Canal Trail Alamo Canal Trail Feasibility 540901 585,000 7,069 Trails 5 Anthony Chabot Replace With Vault Toilets 150000 124,320 115,998 Maintenance 6 Anthony Chabot Replace Roof at Equestrian Ctr 175100 180,000 - Maintenance 7 Anthony Chabot Replace 10 Chemical Toilets 507100 150,000 150,000 Maintenance 8 Anthony Chabot Fuel Break Management 541200 972,713 416,552 Fire 9 Anthony Chabot Fuel Management Chabot Grove 541300 988,333 104,470 Fire 10 Anthony Chabot Vault Toilets for Bort Meadows 551800 50,000 - Maintenance 11 Ardenwood Center Upgrade Electrical System 147700 175,000 129,298 Design & Construction -41- 12 Ardenwood Center Review Inspect Train Center 501900 20,000 16,704 Design & Construction 13 Bay Area Ridge Trail Construct Feeder Trail 1 149100 150,900 83,848 Trails 14 Bay Area Ridge Trail APN Investments 210100 884,500 4,807 Land 15 Bay Area Ridge Trail APN Investments 210101 54,000 54,000 Land 16 Bay Area Ridge Trail Melzer 219500 15,000 10,838 Land 17 Bay Area Ridge Trail Gillrie 219600 1,034,500 4,331 Land 18 Bay Area Ridge Trail Gillrie 219601 83,060 83,060 Park Operations 19 Bay Point Shoreline Develop Staging Area 142200 678,341 28,137 Design & Construction 20 Bay Point Shoreline Study Delta Spur Trail 509300 108,441 108,420 Trails 21 Bay Water Trail Suisun Properties 237200 10,000 2,425 Land 22 Big Break Delta Science Ctr Construction 104803 6,649,884 414,131 Design & Construction 23 Big Break Delta Science Ctr Construction 104804 29,644 29,644 Maintenance 24 Big Break Delta Science Ctr Construction 104805 100,000 40,600 Interpretive/Recreation 25 Big Break Excavate Channels 521600 60,600 5,000 Design & Construction 26 Black Diamond Rehabilitate Cemetery 120400 49,550 5,418 Park Operations 27 Black Diamond Improve Mine Shaft 121001 200,000 200,000 Park Operations 28 Black Diamond Historic Mine Development 121100 793,285 34,151 Park Operations 29 Black Diamond Construct Wooden Stairway 145900 5,000 5,000 Design & Construction *1xxxxx=Development or Infrastructure, 2xxxxx=Land Acq, 2xxxx1=Safety & Security, 5xxxxx=OTA or Maintenance Active Projects - 2014 Budget Exhibit 2a Remaining Location Description Project* Total Budget Managed By Budget 30 Black Diamond Review and Construct Pond Rehab 146500 10,000 10,000 Design & Construction 31 Black Diamond Assess and Restore Historic Si 172000 25,000 25,000 Park Operations 32 Black Diamond Clayton Ranch 208501 122,182 64,844 Park Operations 33 Black Diamond ANG/Eastern Development Corp 214701 134,200 98,082 Park Operations 34 Black Diamond Chaparral Spring 215201 32,000 15,392 Park Operations 35 Black Diamond Save Mt Diablo-Irish Canyon 219101 13,500 11,000 Park Operations 36 Black Diamond Plog Property 231900 50,000 14,558 Land 37 Black Diamond Antioch Unif Sch Dist/Moller 234400 178,345 94,256 Land 38 Black Diamond Antioch Unif Sch Dist/Moller 234401 236,000 191,092 Park Operations 39 Black Diamond Barron 235201 80,000 77,500 Park Operations 40 Black Diamond Austin-Thomas 235401 107,500 105,000 Park Operations -42- 41 Black Diamond Affinito 236101 225,000 197,690 Park Operations 42 Black Diamond Riley 237600 65,000 12,501 Land 43 Black Diamond SMD-Thomas North 238801 52,500 52,500 Park Operations 44 Black Diamond SMD-Nortonville 239600 15,000 3,960 Land 45 Black Diamond Torres 239700 10,000 7,861 Land 46 Black Diamond Mine Shaft Safety Repairs 521000 100,000 24,119 Park Operations 47 Black Diamond Center Mining Museum 101200 70,000 64,099 Park Operations 48 Black Diamond Center Plant Trees 115501 50,000 1,062 Park Operations 49 Black Diamond-Round Valley Tr Kuhn 208600 10,000 8,893 Land 50 Black Diamond-Round Valley Tr Fox Ridge Manor 216301 40,500 40,500 Park Operations 51 Botanic Garden Analyze and Prep Botanic Garden 173900 100,000 100,000 Design & Construction 52 Briones Build Overnight Camping 101700 50,000 49,047 Park Operations 53 Briones Williamson 216701 52,000 4,000 Park Operations 54 Briones Remington Ranch 217701 61,500 53,059 Park Operations 55 Briones Thomas 218900 20,000 6,512 Land 56 Briones Svenhards Partnership 238500 14,500 4,414 Land 57 Briones Griffin-Phillips 241700 15,000 3,806 Land 58 Briones Study Road Access Alignment 503100 110,000 61,039 Design & Construction *1xxxxx=Development or Infrastructure, 2xxxxx=Land Acq, 2xxxx1=Safety & Security, 5xxxxx=OTA or Maintenance Active Projects - 2014 Budget Exhibit 2a Remaining Location Description Project* Total Budget Managed By Budget 59 Brooks Island Enhance Tern Nesting Area 550700 284,530 284,530 Stewardship 60 Brushy Peak Construct Staging Area 124400 796,479 34,881 Maintenance 61 Brushy Peak Build Water System 170900 23,500 9,655 Stewardship 62 Brushy Peak Ahmed Property 225400 45,000 10,913 Land 63 Brushy Peak Murray Township/Brushy Peak 230700 336,925 336,925 Land 64 Brushy Peak Dhaoui Property 232700 10,000 6,886 Land 65 Brushy Peak Ralph Properties II Newell Pl 239100 10,000 2,787 Land 66 Brushy Peak William Ralph Trust Eddie's 239200 59,875 4,327 Land 67 Brushy Peak Mitigate Salamander
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Proposal for Pillar Point Rvpark Public Restroom and Green Space Design,Engineering,Permitting
    PPRROOPPOOSSAALL FFOORR PPIILLLLAARR PPOOIINNTT RRVV PPAARRKK PPUUBBLLIICC RREESSTTRROOOOMM AANNDD GGRREEEENN SSPPAACCEE DDEESSIIGGNN,, EENNGGIINNEEEERRIINNGG,, PPEERRMMIITTTTIINNGG AANNDD CCOONNSSTTRRUUCCTTIIOONN SSUUPPPPOORRTT SSEERRVVIICCEESS Submitted to: San Mateo County Harbor District Submitted by: Questa Engineering Corporation In Association with: Ware Associates Zeiger Engineers, Inc. mack5 October 7, 2019 October 7, 2019 San Mateo County Harbor District Attn: Deputy Secretary of the District 504 Ave Alhambra, Ste. 200 El Granada, CA 94018 Subject: Proposal for Pillar Point RV Park Public Restroom and Green Space Design, Engineering, Permitting and Construction Support Services Dear Mr. Moren: Questa Engineering Corporation is pleased to present this Proposal for the Pillar Point Project. We have assembled a highly qualified team, including Ware Associates (architecture/engineering services), Zeiger Engineers, Inc. (electrical engineering), and mack5 (cost estimating). Questa is widely recognized as one of California’s leading park and trail planning and engineering design firms for open space and natural park areas in constrained and challenging sites, including coastal and beach areas. We also have extensive experience in trail planning and design in parks, and sites with complex environmental and geotechnical issues. Questa provides complete services in planning, landscape architecture and engineering design of recreational improvement projects, from preliminary engineering investigations/feasibility studies and constraints
    [Show full text]
  • Bothin Marsh 46
    EMERGENT ECOLOGIES OF THE BAY EDGE ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE AND SEA LEVEL RISE CMG Summer Internship 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface Research Introduction 2 Approach 2 What’s Out There Regional Map 6 Site Visits ` 9 Salt Marsh Section 11 Plant Community Profiles 13 What’s Changing AUTHORS Impacts of Sea Level Rise 24 Sarah Fitzgerald Marsh Migration Process 26 Jeff Milla Yutong Wu PROJECT TEAM What We Can Do Lauren Bergenholtz Ilia Savin Tactical Matrix 29 Julia Price Site Scale Analysis: Treasure Island 34 Nico Wright Site Scale Analysis: Bothin Marsh 46 This publication financed initiated, guided, and published under the direction of CMG Landscape Architecture. Conclusion Closing Statements 58 Unless specifically referenced all photographs and Acknowledgments 60 graphic work by authors. Bibliography 62 San Francisco, 2019. Cover photo: Pump station fronting Shorebird Marsh. Corte Madera, CA RESEARCH INTRODUCTION BREADTH As human-induced climate change accelerates and impacts regional map coastal ecologies, designers must anticipate fast-changing conditions, while design must adapt to and mitigate the effects of climate change. With this task in mind, this research project investigates the needs of existing plant communities in the San plant communities Francisco Bay, explores how ecological dynamics are changing, of the Bay Edge and ultimately proposes a toolkit of tactics that designers can use to inform site designs. DEPTH landscape tactics matrix two case studies: Treasure Island Bothin Marsh APPROACH Working across scales, we began our research with a broad suggesting design adaptations for Treasure Island and Bothin survey of the Bay’s ecological history and current habitat Marsh.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Oyster Reef Construction Underway in Richmond San
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Media Contact: Taylor Samuelson [email protected] 510-286-4182 April 19, 2019 Native Oyster Reef Construction Underway in Richmond San Francisco Bay Living Shorelines Project 350 Reef Structures will become habitat for Native Oysters and Pacific Herring Richmond, CA - From April 9-30, 350 oyster reef elements are being placed in nearshore areas to create a living shoreline near Giant Marsh at Point Pinole Regional Shoreline managed by East Bay Regional Park District in the City of Richmond. Eelgrass beds will be planted next to the reefs in the following weeks to create a habitat ideal for the recruitment of native Olympia oysters and other aquatic species. Living shorelines use nature-based infrastructure to create shoreline buffers that reduce the impacts from sea level rise and erosion, while creating habitat for fish and wildlife. Though a relatively new climate adaptation technique, living shorelines are proving to be an effective approach to protecting coastal resources and shoreline communities. The Giant Marsh project is one of a small number of living shoreline trial projects taking place in the San Francisco Bay, but is the only one that connects the submerged underwater habitats with adjacent wetlands and upland ecotone plant communities. This innovative demonstration project is testing a combined living shorelines approach with habitat elements at different tidal elevations at the same site, with a goal of encouraging other cities and partners to undertake this kind of climate adaptation habitat restoration project at additional sites in the bay. The multi-habitat project at Giant Marsh builds on lessons learned from the Coastal Conservancy’s living shoreline project constructed directly across the bay in San Rafael in 2012, which included the construction of oyster reefs and eelgrass beds.
    [Show full text]
  • California Folklore Miscellany Index
    Topics: A - Mass Vol Page Topics: Mast - Z Vol Page Abbreviations 19 264 Mast, Blanche & Family 36 127-29 Abernathy 16 13 Mathematics 24 62 Abominable Snowman in the Trinity 26 262-3 Mattole 4 295 Alps Abortion 1 261 Mauk, Frank 34 89 Abortion 22 143 Mauldin, Henry 23 378-89 Abscess 1 226 Maxwell, Mrs. Vest Peak 9 343 Absent-Minded Professor 35 109 May Day 21 56 Absher Family History 38 152-59 May Day (Kentfield) 7 56 AC Spark Plug 16 44 Mayor of White's Hill 10 67 Accidents 20 38 Maze, The Mystic 17 210-16 Accidents 24 61, 74 McCool,Finn 23 256 Ace of Spades 5 347-348 McCoy, Bob (Wyoming character) 27 93 Acorn Acres Ranch 5 347-348 McCoy, Capt. Bill 23 123 Acorn dance 36 286 McDonal House Ghost 37 108-11 Acorn mush 4 189 McGettigan, Louis 9 346 Acorn, Black 24 32 McGuire, J. I. 9 349 Acorns 17 39 McKiernan,Charles 23 276-8 Actress 20 198-9 McKinley 22 32 Adair, Bethena Owens 34 143 McKinleyville 2 82 Adobe 22 230 McLean, Dan 9 190 Adobe 23 236 McLean, Dan 9 190 Adobe 24 147 McNear's Point 8 8 Adobe house 17 265, 314 McNeil, Dan 3 336 Adobe Hut, Old 19 116, 120 Meade, Ed (Actor) 34 154 Adobe, Petaluma 11 176-178 Meals 17 266 Adventure of Tom Wood 9 323 Measles 1 238 Afghan 1 288 Measles 20 28 Agriculture 20 20 Meat smoking, storing 28 96 Agriculture (Loleta) 10 135 Meat, Salting and Smoking 15 76 Agwiworld---WWII, Richfield Tank 38 4 Meats 1 161 Aimee McPherson Poe 29 217 Medcalf, Donald 28 203-07 Ainu 16 139 Medical Myths 15 68 Airline folklore 29 219-50 Medical Students 21 302 Airline Lore 34 190-203 Medicinal plants 24 182 Airplane
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change Adaptation Study APPENDIX
    City of Richmond Climate Change Adaptation Study APPENDIX City of Richmond Climate Action Plan Appendix F: Climate Change Adaptation Study Acknowledgements The City of Richmond has been an active participant in the Contra Costa County Adapting to Rising Tides Project, led by the Bay Conservation Development Commission (BCDC) in partnership with the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, the State Coastal Conservancy, the San Francisco Estuary Partnership, the San Francisco Estuary Institute, Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, and consulting firm AECOM. Environmental Science Associates (ESA) completed this Adaptation Study in coordination with BCDC, relying in part on reports and maps developed for the Adapting to Rising Tides project to assess the City of Richmond’s vulnerabilities with respect to sea level rise and coastal flooding. City of Richmond Climate Action Plan F-i Appendix F: Climate Change Adaptation Study This page intentionally left blank F-ii City of Richmond Climate Action Plan Appendix F: Climate Change Adaptation Study Table of Contents Acknowledgements i 1. Executive Summary 1 1.1 Coastal Flooding 2 1.2 Water Supply 2 1.3 Critical Transportation Assets 3 1.4 Vulnerable Populations 3 1.5 Summary 3 2. Study Methodology 4 2.1 Scope and Organize 4 2.2 Assess 4 2.3 Define 4 2.4 Plan 5 2.5 Implement and Monitor 5 3. Setting 6 3.1 Statewide Climate Change Projections 6 3.2 Bay Area Region Climate Change Projections 7 3.3 Community Assets 8 3.4 Relevant Local Planning Initiatives 9 3.5 Relevant State and Regional Planning Initiatives 10 4.
    [Show full text]
  • EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT Vision and Mission Statements
    EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT Vision and Mission Statements Vision The East Bay Regional Park District will preserve a priceless heritage of natural and cultural resources, open space, parks and trails for the future and will set aside park areas for the enjoyment and healthful recreation for generations to come. An environmental ethic guides us in all that we do. Mission The East Bay Regional Park District will achieve the above vision in the following ways: • Provide a diversified system of regional parklands, trails, and parkland-related services that will offer outstanding opportunities for creative use of outdoor time. • Acquire and preserve significant biologic, geologic, scenic, and historic resources within Alameda and Contra Costa Counties. • Manage, maintain and restore the parklands so that they retain their important scenic, natural, and cultural values. • Interpret the parklands by focusing educational programs on both the visitor’s relationship to nature, natural processes, ecology, history of the parklands, and the value of natural conditions. • Support the development and retention of well-trained, dedicated, and productive employees. • Improve access to and use of the parks by members of groups that have been underrepresented, such as disabled, economically disadvantaged, and elderly visitors. • Balance environmental concerns and outdoor recreational opportunities within regional parklands. • Provide recreational development that fosters appropriate use of parklands while preserving their remoteness and intrinsic value. • Create quality programs that recognize the cultural diversity represented in the region. • Participate in partnerships with public agencies, nonprofit organizations, volunteers, and the private sector to achieve mutual goals. • Provide leadership to help guide land use decisions of East Bay governments that relate to the District.
    [Show full text]
  • Control Calendar (PDF
    2007 San Francisco Estuary Invasive Spartina Control Program Schedule Updated: 9/14/07 More information on: Treatment methods Imazapyr Site Locations Treatment Location Treatment Method (gray areas denote sites where treatment was not planned this year or was completed) Imazapyr Herbicide Manual Sub-Area Amphibious Aerial: Aerial: Spray Covering with Manual Site # Site Name Sub-Area Name County Treatment date Truck Backpack Boat Excavation Number vehicle Broadcast Ball Geotextile Fabric Digging 01a Channel Mouth Alameda 7/31-8/2/07 XX 01b Lower Channel (not including mouth) Alameda 7/31-8/2/07 XX 01c Upper Channel Alameda 7/31-8/2/07 Alameda Flood Control XX 1 Upper Channel - Union City Blvd to I- Channel 01d Alameda 7/23-7/27/07 XX 880 01e Strip Marsh No. of Channel Mouth Alameda 7/31-8/2/07 X 01f Pond 3-AFCC Alameda 7/31-8/2/07 XX Belmont Slough/Island, North Point, 02a Bird Island, Steinberger Slough/ San Mateo 9/10-9/13/07 XX Redwood Shores Steinberger Slough South, Corkscrew 02b San Mateo 7/31-8/2/07 XXX Slough, Redwood Creek North 02c B2 North Quadrant San Mateo 7/31-8/2/07 XX 02d B2 South Quadrant - Rookery San Mateo 7/31-8/2/07 X 2 Bair/Greco Islands 02e West Point Slough NW San Mateo 7/31-8/2/07 XX 02f Greco Island North San Mateo 7/31-8/2/07 X 02g West Point Slough SW and East San Mateo 8/27- 8/30/07 XX 02h Greco Island South San Mateo 7/31-8/2/07 X 02i Ravenswood Slough & Mouth San Mateo 7/31-8/2/07 XX 02j Ravenswood Open Space Preserve San Mateo 9/10-9/13/07 X 03a Blackie's Creek (above bridge) Marin 8/29/07 X 3 Blackie's
    [Show full text]
  • Northern News
    NORTHERN NEWS A Publication of the Northern Section of the California Chapter of APA American Planning Association July/August 2016 Making Great Communities Happen Bay Area housing markets and income inequality Nina Gruen, Page 1 Brexit, a planner’s view from London Ellen Greenberg, FAICP, Page 12 Red Rock, looking south from San Rafael Bridge Photo: Elizabeth Rynecki NORTHERN NEWS A Publication of the Northern Section of the California Chapter of APA American Planning Association JULY/AUGUST 2016 Making Great Communities Happen The future of Bay Area housing markets and income inequality What the demographics tell us Nina Gruen ecause U.S. birth and death rates are Bpretty stable, at least for the not too distant future, predicting demographic change is easier than predicting the future of the economy. The rate of immigration is basically the only unknown. As shown in Table 1, the younger the generation, the greater the forecast growth. Conversely, the size of the older generations will decline. So for example, the Boomer generation, formerly the largest, will decrease substantially — its oldest members will be age Table 1. Generations as a percent of total U.S. population projections, 2016–2030. 84 in 2030. The Millennials, at 84 million, Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division, 2014 National Population Projections; Gruen Gruen + Associates. are currently the country’s largest demographic. By 2030, this generation will be between the ages of 30 and 48, and will account for almost 91 million people. The largest generation, the recently named iGeneration, born after 2000 — will account for over 125 million by 2030, or 35 percent of the total U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Original Index List [Box Numbers May Vary]
    Original Index List [Box Numbers May Vary] MS 208: VERBARG PAPERS - THE KNAVE CORRESPONDENCE SUBJECT IDENTIFICATION Academy Library Guild business correspondence Date: 1958 Author: Donald Demarest Box 9 Acme Athletic Club narration and photocopied newspaper articles, correspondence, diary of George T. Loher's bicycle trip from Oakland to New York City (27 pp.) Date: 1895 Author: Robert Smith Box 9 Adams, Ansel see California Historical Society Adams Express Co story of Ben Moulton, express rider (4 pp.) Date: 1850s Author: Henry Winfred Splitter Box 9 Adobe see California Aetna Springs see E. Clampus Vitus AFL-CIO see Guild, Newspaper Agriculture developments of steam engine Date: 1901 Author: Lapham, Macy Box 5 rise of farms over mines in Siskiyou County Date: 1858 Author: Rosborough, Alex Box 5 farm that grew barley for brewers; workers' conditions; prices; map (5 pp.) Date: n.d. Author: Carl L. Germann Box 9 more fruit history (7 pp.) Date: 1870s Author: Harry Butler Box 9 see also: Fruit Gerber Hopyard Road Horner's Mills Humboldt County Navel Oranges Patterson, William Rix's Day Book of 1867-69 Scoville's Side-Hill Plow Sheilds, Peter J. Sward de Grist, John W. Airship see Aviation Alameda childhood memories Date: 1890 Author: McCurdy, Carleton A. Box 5 Alameda County see California Railway Fruitvale Historical Landmarks Junior League Mayhew, Sheriff Joseph A. Alameda School House resource information Date: 1847- Author: Patton, Ann Box 5 Alaska see California Historical Society Alcove Canyon description; Harris Hills; stats and dam sight Date: 1892 Author: Mauldin, Henry Box 5 Alhambra Valley see Contra Costa County Alleghany history of area Date: 1940 Author: Willard P.
    [Show full text]
  • Invasive Spartina Project (Cordgrass)
    SAN FRANCISCO ESTUARY INVASIVE SPARTINA PROJECT 2612-A 8th Street ● Berkeley ● California 94710 ● (510) 548-2461 Preserving native wetlands PEGGY OLOFSON PROJECT DIRECTOR [email protected] Date: July 1, 2011 INGRID HOGLE MONITORING PROGRAM To: Jennifer Krebs, SFEP MANAGER [email protected] From: Peggy Olofson ERIK GRIJALVA FIELD OPERATIONS MANAGER Subject: Report of Work Completed Under Estuary 2100 Grant #X7-00T04701 [email protected] DREW KERR The State Coastal Conservancy received an Estuary 2100 Grant for $172,325 to use FIELD OPERATIONS ASSISTANT MANAGER for control of non-native invasive Spartina. Conservancy distributed the funds [email protected] through sub-grants to four Invasive Spartina Project (ISP) partners, including Cali- JEN MCBROOM fornia Wildlife Foundation, San Mateo Mosquito Abatement District, Friends of CLAPPER RAIL MONITOR‐ ING MANAGER Corte Madera Creek Watershed, and State Parks and Recreation. These four ISP part- [email protected] ners collectively treated approximately 90 net acres of invasive Spartina for two con- MARILYN LATTA secutive years, furthering the baywide eradication of invasive Spartina restoring and PROJECT MANAGER 510.286.4157 protecting many hundreds of acres of tidal marsh (Figure 1, Table 1). In addition to [email protected] treatment work, the grant funds also provided laboratory analysis of water samples Major Project Funders: collected from treatment sites where herbicide was applied, to confirm that water State Coastal Conser‐ quality was not degraded by the treatments. vancy American Recovery & ISP Partners and contractors conducted treatment work in accordance with Site Spe- Reinvestment Act cific Plans prepared by ISP (Grijalva et al. 2008; National Oceanic & www.spartina.org/project_documents/2008-2010_site_plans_doc_list.htm), and re- Atmospheric Admini‐ stration ported in the 2008-2009 Treatment Report (Grijalva & Kerr, 2011; U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Invasive Spartina Project Treatment Schedule
    2021 Invasive Spartina Project Treatment Schedule Updated: 7/26/21 Environmental Review Site Locations (map) Treatment Methods Where: How: Herbicide Use: of Imazapyr Treatment Method Treatment Location Treatment Dates* Imazapyr Herbicide Manual Digging, Site Sub-Area *(COI=Dug during Complete Amphibious Aerial: Mowing, Site Name Sub-Area Name Truck Backpack Airboat # Number course of inventory) for 2021? vehicle Broadcast and/or Covering 01a Channel Mouth X Lower Channel (not including 01b X mouth) 01c Upper Channel X Alameda Flood 4 years with no 1 Upper Channel - Union City Blvd to Control Channel 01d invasive Spartina I-880 (2017-2020) 01e Strip Marsh No. of Channel Mouth X No Invasive 01f Pond 3-AFCC Spartina 2020 02a.1a Belmont Slough Mouth X X X 02a.1b Belmont Slough Mouth South X X X Upper Belmont Slough and 02a.2 X X X Redwood Shores 02a.3 Bird Island X 02a.4 Redwood Shores Mitigation Bank X 02b.1 Corkscrew Slough X X Steinberger Slough South, 02b.2 X X Redwood Creek Northwest 02c.1a B2 North Quadrant West 8/14 X X 02c.1b B2 North Quadrant East 8/24 X X 02c.2 B2 North Quadrant South 8/12-8/13 X X 02d.1a B2 South Quadrant West X 02d.1b B2 South Quadrant East X 02d.2 B2 South Quadrant (2) X 2 Bair/Greco Islands 02d.3 B2 South Quadrant (3) X 02e Westpoint Slough NW X X 02f Greco Island North X X 02g Westpoint Slough SW and East X X 02h Greco Island South X X 02i Ravenswood Slough & Mouth X Ravenswood Open Space Preserve 02j.1 X (north Hwy 84) * Scheduling occurs throughout the treatment season.
    [Show full text]
  • North Richmond Shoreline Vision Is an Ambitious Framework for Resilience and Advance Community Revitalization Development Among Stakeholders Equity
    STRATEGIES & ACTIONS North Together, we developed a community-informed Vision for climate-ready adaptations along the North Richmond shoreline with a focus on the upland Richmond transition zone, environmental justice and resiliency. Shoreline Protect and conserve open space Restore and enhance a diversity of Acquire undeveloped parcels. Change land habitats and living resources use designations along the shoreline. Pursue opportunities for restoration and recreation. Complete the Giant Marsh Improve & increase shoreline public Living Shorelines project. Monitor recent VISION projects. Develop nature-based shoreline access and understanding infrastructure that integrates treated A community-based Support an improved network of pedestrian wastewater at the West County Wastewater access along the shoreline including Bay Trail District treatment facility. approach to planning for the segments. Develop interpretive centers at upland transition zone Point Pinole Regional Shoreline and the West Build capacity for equity, County Wastewater District. environment, and economic The North Richmond Shoreline Vision is an ambitious framework for resilience and Advance community revitalization development among stakeholders equity. It was developed collaboratively with urban greening and compatible Establish a standing Working Group. by local & regional agencies, community- Encourage local alternative energy, local food based organizations, landowners, scientists, improvements production & markets. Create green jobs and and residents. This Vision considers the transition zone, an area between the Support compatible development such as training programs. Provide incentives for low wetlands and uplands, where significant green business, low impact development, impact development. opportunity exists for watershed protection parks & sports fields. Design and construct as well as for improving quality of life renewable energy pilot projects. for residents.
    [Show full text]