Continuous Modular Strategic Planning North of England Freight Strategic Questions

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Continuous Modular Strategic Planning North of England Freight Strategic Questions Continuous Modular Strategic Planning North of England Freight Strategic Questions 12 November 2018 Document Control Document Title Continuous Modular Strategic Planning – North of England - Freight Version and date V1.0 12/11/2018 Author Richard Iggulden Security Level Unrestricted 2 Contents Foreword ........................................................................................... 6 Executive Summary .......................................................................... 7 Strategic Questions .............................................................................................. 7 Meeting the growing demand in rail freight ........................................................... 8 Recommendations ............................................................................................... 8 Introduction ....................................................................................... 9 An Investment Strategy to Support Growth .......................................................... 9 The Railways in the North of England ................................................................ 10 Demand and Growth .......................................................................................... 12 The Starting Point............................................................................................... 12 The Funding Environment .................................................................................. 13 New Ways of Attracting Funding and Generating Profit ..................................... 13 Defining a Strategy for Growth ........................................................................... 14 Developing the Study ..................................................................... 18 Process .............................................................................................................. 18 Freight Forecasts ............................................................................................... 19 Planning Approach ............................................................................................. 19 An evolution of the Long Term Planning Process .............................................. 20 Strategic Freight Issues in the North of England ......................... 21 Efficient Freight Routing and Freight Capacity in Major Urban Centres ............. 21 Changes in Freight Market Sectors .................................................................... 24 Areas with potential for Rail-Freight growth ........................................................ 26 Geographical Route Sections ........................................................ 28 F.00 Introduction.................................................................................................. 28 Cumbria .............................................................................................................. 29 Lancashire .......................................................................................................... 31 Merseyside ......................................................................................................... 32 Greater Manchester ........................................................................................... 35 Derbyshire .......................................................................................................... 36 Cheshire ............................................................................................................. 41 Staffordshire ....................................................................................................... 44 3 Northumberland.................................................................................................. 45 Tyne & Wear ...................................................................................................... 46 County Durham .................................................................................................. 46 Tees Valley ........................................................................................................ 47 Yorkshire ............................................................................................................ 48 Nottinghamshire ................................................................................................. 50 North and North East Lincolnshire...................................................................... 51 Core West – East Freight Routes ....................................................................... 52 F.15.1 Port of Immingham Routes ............................................................................... 53 F.15.2 Carlisle – Newcastle.......................................................................................... 54 F.15.3 Carlisle – Settle – Leeds ................................................................................... 55 F.15.4 Calder Valley Routes ........................................................................................ 56 F.15.5 Liverpool – Manchester – Huddersfield – Wakefield – Milford Jn ...................... 57 F.15.6 Manchester – Sheffield (Hope Valley) ............................................................... 59 F.15.7 Skipton - Colne ................................................................................................. 60 East Coast Main Line (ECML) ............................................................................ 62 West Coast Main Line (WCML) .......................................................................... 64 Conclusion and Recommendations .............................................. 67 Conclusion and Recommendations .................................................................... 67 Future Freight Strategic Questions for the North of England .............................. 68 Consultation and Next Steps ......................................................... 69 How can you contribute ...................................................................................... 69 Privacy Statement .............................................................................................. 70 Next Steps .......................................................................................................... 70 Appendix A: Freight Forecasts by Route Section ..................................... 71 FF.01 Cumbria ............................................................................................................. 71 FF.02 Lancashire ......................................................................................................... 75 FF.03 Merseyside ........................................................................................................ 82 FF.04 Greater Manchester ........................................................................................... 88 FF.05 Derbyshire ....................................................................................................... 101 FF.06 Cheshire .......................................................................................................... 104 FF.07 Staffordshire .................................................................................................... 115 FF.08 Northumberland ............................................................................................... 117 4 FF.09 Tyne & Wear .................................................................................................... 121 FF.10 County Durham ................................................................................................ 126 FF.11 Tees Valley ...................................................................................................... 128 FF.12 Yorkshire .......................................................................................................... 136 FF.13 Nottingham shire .............................................................................................. 163 FF.14 North and North East Lincolnshire ................................................................... 165 FF.15 Core West-East Freight Routes ....................................................................... 169 FF.15.1 Port of Immingham Routes ............................................................................ 169 FF.15.2 Carlisle – Newcastle ..................................................................................... 176 FF.15.3 Carlisle – Settle – Leeds Corridor ................................................................. 178 FF.15.4 Calder Valley Routes .................................................................................... 181 FF.15.5 Liverpool – Manchester – Huddersfield – Wakefield – Milford Jn ................. 185 FF.15.6 Manchester – Sheffield (Hope Valley)........................................................... 191 FF.16 East Coast Main Line and GN/GE ................................................................... 193 FF.17 West Coast Main Line (WCML) ....................................................................... 202 Appendix B: Summary of Investment Choices ....................................... 206 Appendix C: Abbreviations & Glossary ................................................... 207 Appendix D: Reference Material ............................................................... 210 5 Foreword We’re pleased to present these Freight Strategic Questions and Rail-freight Investment Choices for the railway in the North of England. The railways of the North of England are an asset
Recommended publications
  • To Let Design and Build Opportunity
    WAKEFIELD EUROPORT, J31 M62 WEST YORKSHIRE SAT NAV: WF10 5QH TO LET DESIGN AND BUILD OPPORTUNITY Fully Consented Cross Dock Logistics Development of up to 510,000 sq ft (47,298 sq m) 31 INDICATIVE CGI 2 WELCOME TO Switch comprises one of the largest Design and Build opportunities in the north of England with full planning consent for warehouse and distribution accommodation up to approximately 510,000 sq ft. The development is located immediately adjacent to Junction 31 of the M62 within the well established Wakefield Europort business park and benefits from excellent links to the region, the rest of the UK and mainland Europe via road, rail and sea. Wakefield Europort is regarded as one of the regions most sought after distribution locations which is already home to occupiers such as Haribo, Royal Mail, Asda, Bibby and Warburtons. INDICATIVE CGI A MAJOR EQUIDISTANT BETWEEN DISTRIBUTION HUB M1 AND A1(M) CORRIDORS HIGH SPEC FANTASTIC PORT CROSS DOCK UNIT CONNECTIONS EXCELLENT ACCESS ADJACENT TO THE WAKEFIELD TO J31, M62 RAIL FREIGHT TERMINAL INDICATIVE CGI 3 INDICATIVE LAYOUT & SPECIFICATION 78 DOCK LEVEL LOADING DOORS GATE HOUSE 7 LEVEL DOORS HGV PARKING YARD DEPTH MAX 50M TRANSPORT HUB 4 LEVEL ACCESS 10 DOCKS 10 DOCKS 10 DOCKS 10 DOCKS 22 MOTORCYCLE SPACES 437 PARKING SPACES OVER 3 LEVELS (25,245 SQ FT) 2 STOREY OFFICES 2 YARD DEPTH MAX 50M 15M TO HAUNCH 80 HGV PARKING SPACES 110 COVERED CYCLE SPACES Accommodation 3 LEVEL CAR PARKING (437 SPACES) Sq ft Sq m 3 LEVEL ACCESS 10 DOCKS 10 DOCKS 10 DOCKS 8 DOCKS Gatehouse 215 20 TRANSPORT
    [Show full text]
  • With St. Peter's, Hebden
    With St. Peter’s, Hebden Annual Parochial Church Meeting 15th November 2020 Reports Booklet The Parish of Linton St. Michael’s & All Angels, Linton St. Peter’s, Hebden Church Officials Rector Rev David Macha Reader Cath Currier PCC Secretary Vacancy Church Wardens Rory Magill Helen Davy Mark Ludlum Valerie Ludlum Treasurer Maureen Chaduc Deanery Synod Representatives Lesley Brooker Jennie Scott Lay Members Neil McCormac Betty Hammonds Jane Sayer Jacqui Sugden + 5 Vacancies Sidespersons Rita Clark Ian Clark Betty Hammonds Dennis Leeds Bunty Leder Valerie Ludlum Phyllida Oates Bryan Pearson Pamela Whatley-Holmes John Wolfenden Joan Whittaker Muriel White Brian Metcalfe Mary Douglas Ian Simpson The Parish of Linton St. Michael’s & All Angels, Linton St. Peter’s, Hebden Meeting of Parishioners – 15th November 2020 Agenda Minutes of Meeting of Parishioners 2019 Election of Churchwardens Annual Parochial Church Meeting – 15th November 2020 Agenda 1 Apologies for absence 2 Reception of the Electoral Roll 3 Election of Laity to the Parochial Parish Council and to the Deanery Synod 4 Appointment of Sidepersons 5 Approval of 2019 APCM Minutes 7 2019 Annual Accounts – Receipt of and Acceptance of Independent Examiner’s Statement for 2019 accounts 8 Annual Reports in booklets 9 Chairman’s Address 10 AOB & Questions Electoral Roll Information at 6th October 2020 There are 64 names on the Electoral Roll for 2020. This is an increase of one from 2019 and comprises 55 resident in the parish and 9 not resident in the parish. The electronic publication of the Electoral Roll on the Linton parish website undoubtedly contributed to the low level of revisions and no removals were notified.
    [Show full text]
  • High Speed Rail
    House of Commons Transport Committee High Speed Rail Tenth Report of Session 2010–12 Volume III Additional written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be published 24 May, 7, 14, 21 and 28 June, 12 July, 6, 7 and 13 September and 11 October 2011 Published on 8 November 2011 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited The Transport Committee The Transport Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for Transport and its Associate Public Bodies. Current membership Mrs Louise Ellman (Labour/Co-operative, Liverpool Riverside) (Chair) Steve Baker (Conservative, Wycombe) Jim Dobbin (Labour/Co-operative, Heywood and Middleton) Mr Tom Harris (Labour, Glasgow South) Julie Hilling (Labour, Bolton West) Kwasi Kwarteng (Conservative, Spelthorne) Mr John Leech (Liberal Democrat, Manchester Withington) Paul Maynard (Conservative, Blackpool North and Cleveleys) Iain Stewart (Conservative, Milton Keynes South) Graham Stringer (Labour, Blackley and Broughton) Julian Sturdy (Conservative, York Outer) The following were also members of the committee during the Parliament. Angie Bray (Conservative, Ealing Central and Acton) Lilian Greenwood (Labour, Nottingham South) Kelvin Hopkins (Labour, Luton North) Gavin Shuker (Labour/Co-operative, Luton South) Angela Smith (Labour, Penistone and Stocksbridge) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • Der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr
    26 . 3 . 84 Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr . L 82 / 67 RICHTLINIE DES RATES vom 28 . Februar 1984 betreffend das Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten landwirtschaftlichen Gebiete im Sinne der Richtlinie 75 /268 / EWG ( Vereinigtes Königreich ) ( 84 / 169 / EWG ) DER RAT DER EUROPAISCHEN GEMEINSCHAFTEN — Folgende Indexzahlen über schwach ertragsfähige Böden gemäß Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe a ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG wurden bei der Bestimmung gestützt auf den Vertrag zur Gründung der Euro­ jeder der betreffenden Zonen zugrunde gelegt : über päischen Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft , 70 % liegender Anteil des Grünlandes an der landwirt­ schaftlichen Nutzfläche , Besatzdichte unter 1 Groß­ vieheinheit ( GVE ) je Hektar Futterfläche und nicht über gestützt auf die Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG des Rates vom 65 % des nationalen Durchschnitts liegende Pachten . 28 . April 1975 über die Landwirtschaft in Berggebieten und in bestimmten benachteiligten Gebieten ( J ), zuletzt geändert durch die Richtlinie 82 / 786 / EWG ( 2 ), insbe­ Die deutlich hinter dem Durchschnitt zurückbleibenden sondere auf Artikel 2 Absatz 2 , Wirtschaftsergebnisse der Betriebe im Sinne von Arti­ kel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe b ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG wurden durch die Tatsache belegt , daß das auf Vorschlag der Kommission , Arbeitseinkommen 80 % des nationalen Durchschnitts nicht übersteigt . nach Stellungnahme des Europäischen Parlaments ( 3 ), Zur Feststellung der in Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe c ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG genannten geringen Bevöl­ in Erwägung nachstehender Gründe : kerungsdichte wurde die Tatsache zugrunde gelegt, daß die Bevölkerungsdichte unter Ausschluß der Bevölke­ In der Richtlinie 75 / 276 / EWG ( 4 ) werden die Gebiete rung von Städten und Industriegebieten nicht über 55 Einwohner je qkm liegt ; die entsprechenden Durch­ des Vereinigten Königreichs bezeichnet , die in dem schnittszahlen für das Vereinigte Königreich und die Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten Gebiete Gemeinschaft liegen bei 229 beziehungsweise 163 .
    [Show full text]
  • Lancashire and Cumbria Route Utilisation Strategy August 2008
    Lancashire and Cumbria Route Utilisation Strategy August 2008 Foreword I am delighted to present Network Rail’s Route There are currently aspirations for a service Utilisation Strategy (RUS) for Lancashire and between Southport, Preston and Ormskirk. Cumbria, which considers issues affecting This is partly facilitated by work to enhance the railway in this part of the country over the track and signalling between Preston and next decade and gives a view on longer-term Ormskirk, which will allow a standard hourly issues in the years beyond. service pattern with improved journey times but without the need for more rolling stock. Getting to this stage has involved following a now well-established process. However, there Services into Sellafield during peak hours are two key differences with this strategy. suffer from overcrowding, though Northern The first is that no part of the area it covers Rail’s anticipated service from December is the responsibility of either a Passenger 2008 will address that to a degree. It is Transport Executive or a regional body with important services on this route firstly cater public transport responsibilities. Secondly, for peak traffic at Sellafield and Barrow, with the challenge usually faced when producing services outside the peak being on as close a RUS, that of insufficient capacity to meet to an hourly pattern as possible. current or future demand, is not a major A number of consultation responses were problem here. As a result, this strategy received regarding a direct service between focuses on how to make the best use of Manchester and Burnley, including a report what is already available.
    [Show full text]
  • Rail North West
    Rail North West A Class 350 service sits in platform 3 at Oxenholme, perhaps saying how things could have been if the Windermere line had been electrified. Photo courtesy Lakes Line Rail Users Association/ Malcolm Conway Timetable Chaos Caused by Electrification Delay and Cancellation A week of cancellations and delays at meaning a large number of services the start of the new timetable on May needed re-planning to operate with 20th has led to calls by the Mayor of available units, though insufficient Manchester Andy Burnham and the drivers trained on units new to routes Mayor of the Liverpool City Region, (e.g. electric trains to Blackpool North) Steve Rotherham for Northern to be has added to the issue. stripped of its franchise if improvements weren’t made. The Lakes Line between Oxenholme and Windermere is feeling the effects of The disruption was caused primarily by the failure to electrify that line. The delays to the Manchester – Preston replacement bi-mode trains aren’t electrification, and cancellation of ready, but Northern has received some Oxenholme to Windermere schemes, Class 158 diesels from Scotland. With a Newsletter of the North West Branch1 of Railfuture — Summer 2018 Rail North West 2 Summer 2018 top speed of 90mph, they are easier to the greatest timetable change for a timetable on the West Coast Main Line generation as the government carries than the current Class 156 and 153 out the biggest modernisation of the rail units. However, the new units will entail network since Victorian times to an extensive driver training programme, improve services for passengers across and their lack of availability is causing the country.” significant cancellations on this line in particular.
    [Show full text]
  • Transpennine Express and Northern Rail Franchise Renewals Stakeholder Consultation
    APPENDIX 3 TransPennine Express and Northern Rail Franchise Renewals Stakeholder Consultation Response from the Furness Line Community Rail Partnership Contents 1. Summary of Key Points 2. Background 3. Existing Services 4. CRP Preparation for Consultation 5. The Consultation Principles and Proposals 6. Key Response Points from the Furness Line Community Rail Partnership 7. Answers to Consultation Questions Annex A Furness Line Study by The Railway Consultancy Annex B Fares comparison 1. Summary of Key Points 1.1 The current service on the Furness Line is unfit for purpose: o there is a strong case for the retention, and restoration of previous levels of service between Barrow-in-Furness and Manchester Airport; o local services on the line are failing to provide for key markets, particularly commuters wishing to travel west towards Barrow and Ulverston; o the timetable is uncoordinated and irregular and fails to provide adequate capacity at key times. 1.2 Remapping, with potential loss of through services to Manchester, will result in: o over-crowding of TransPennine Scottish services south of Lancaster; o uncertainty of connections at Preston/Lancaster, where poor historical reliability results in passengers having to wait an unacceptable hour or more for the next train. o uncertainty of through connectivity with interchanges on the Northern Hub and HS2 developments. 1.3 Maintaining and improving the quality of rolling stock serving the route, especially on longer distance services, is a strong necessity. 1.4 Franchise planning needs to provide for massive growth in the local economy: o up to ??? new jobs in Barrow and Ulverston alone in next few years; o up to £17 billion investment on Cumbrian coast by mid 2020s.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Rail Report
    Community Rail Report Author: Carolyn Watson Date: 31 March 2017 Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2 1.1 Foreword 2 1.2 Executive Summary 3 2. Community Rail Report 4 2.1 Introduction to the Report 4 2.1.1 Community Rail Partnerships 4 2.1.2 Funding for Community Rail Partnerships 4 2.1.3 Community Rail Partnership Funding Table 1 5 2.1.4 Community Rail Executive Group (ComREG) 6 2.1.5 Community Rail Conference 6 2.1.6 Seed Corn Fund – Kick-starting new ideas 6 2.1.7 Association of Community Rail Partnerships (ACoRP) - Partnership delivery 8 2.1.8 Community Rail Lancashire (CRL) - Developing Engagement Through Education 9 2.1.9 Station Adoption Scheme 10 2.1.10 Northern Franchise/Arriva Strategy - Working with Communities 12 2.1.11 The Community Rail Partnerships 13 3. Community Rail Partnership profiles 14 3.1 Settle - Carlisle Railway Development Company 14 3.2 Leeds - Morecambe Community Rail Partnership 16 3.3 Barton - Cleethorpes Community Rail Partnership 18 3.4 Yorkshire Coast Community Rail Partnership 19 3.5 Penistone Line Community Rail Partnership 20 3.6 Bishop Line Community Rail Partnership 22 3.7 Tyne Valley Community Rail Partnership 24 3.8 Esk Valley Railway Development Company 26 3.9 South Fylde Line Community Rail Partnership 28 3.10 West of Lancashire Community Rail Partnership 30 3.11 Cumbrian Coast Line Community Rail Partnership 32 3.12 Furness Line Community Rail Partnership 34 3.13 Lakes Line Community Rail Partnership 36 3.14 North Cheshire Rail Users Group 38 3.15 Mid Cheshire Community Rail Partnership 39 3.16 East Lancashire Community Rail Partnership 41 3.17 Clitheroe Line Community Rail Partnership 43 3.18 South East Manchester Community Rail Partnership 45 3.19 Crewe to Manchester Community Rail Partnership 47 3.20 High Peak and Hope Valley Community Rail Partnership 49 4.
    [Show full text]
  • April 2020 Railfuture from the North East Bulletin
    News and Views about Railways in the North East of England Welcome to the April 2020 RailFuture From the North East Bulletin. This edition is, Editor’s because of the current problems in getting it printed and distributed, only Chair available electronically. It is being emailed to members and will be on our website. We’ve added a number of links to items either on the Railfuture Website or to websites run by other local rail groups – all of these will offer more detail than we can provide in this newsletter. These links are embedded in the text so if you see something that looks like this, and this link takes you to the NE Home page on the Railfuture Website, just click and you will be transported to the appropriate page on the internet. A message from the Branch Chair I find myself writing this from a position of ‘Lockdown’ at home. I, together with the rest of the committee, hope that you are all managing to steer clear of the horrid Covid-19 virus. The current situation means, of course, that we have had to cancel our branch AGM on 25 April, we don’t know whether the current restrictions on meeting will still be in place by then, but we have to assume that they, or something very similar, will. One further change to report is that Tony Walker has chosen to stand down as editor of this Bulletin. Tony has been a stalwart of the branch committee for many years and has given freely of his time over many aspects of our activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Support Statement
    Hearing Statement – Matter 7 (Washington) Sunderland Core Strategy and Development Plan On behalf of Barratt David Wilson Homes (North East)(East of Washington: Washington Meadows) April 2019 Hearing Statement: Matter 7 (Washington) – Sunderland Core Strategy and Development Plan BDW (North East) (East of Washington: Washington Meadows), April 2019 1. Introduction 1.1. This is a Hearing Statement prepared by Spawforths on behalf of Barratt David Wilson Homes (North East)(BDW) in respect of: • Matter 7: The Strategy, Housing Growth Areas and Safeguarded Land for Washington 1.2. BDW has significant land interests in the area and has made representations to earlier stages of the Local Plan process. 1.3. The Inspector’s Issues and Questions are included in bold for ease of reference. The following responses should be read in conjunction with BDW’s comments upon the submission version of the Sunderland Core Strategy and Development Plan, dated July 2018. 1.4. BDW has also expressed a desire to attend and participate in Matter 7 of the Examination in Public. 2 Hearing Statement: Matter 7 (Washington) – Sunderland Core Strategy and Development Plan BDW (North East) (East of Washington: Washington Meadows), April 2019 2. Matter 7 – The Strategy, Housing Growth Areas and Safeguarded Land for Washington Issue – This matter considers the strategic policies (SP3, SS2 and SS3) and the Housing Growth Areas (HGA1-HGA6) for Washington. Strategic Policies 1.1) Are Policies SP3 and SS2 justified and effective? 2.1. BDW supports the identification of land to the East of Washington (Washington Meadows) as safeguarded land. However, BDW maintain earlier objections and in line with other statements consider the site should be allocated for housing.
    [Show full text]
  • YDNPA Local Plan Draft
    Yorkshire Dales National Park Local Plan 2015-2030 Draft - June 2014 1. Introduction 1 2. Strategic Policies 6. Tourism SP1 National park purposes 9 T1 Camping 73 SP2 Presumption in favour of T2 Temporary visitor sustainable development 11 Accommodation 75 SP3 Spatial strategy 13 T3 Static caravans 77 SP4 Development quality 16 T4 Facilitating visitor enjoyment 79 SP5 Environmental impact and T5 Indoor visitor attractions 81 human safety 17 SP6 Major development 18 7. Wildlife W1 Designated wildlife sites 84 3. Business and Employment and species 84 BE1 Business development sites 20 W2 Ecological networks 86 BE2 Reuse of modern buildings 23 W3 Enhancing biodiversity through BE3 Rural land based enterprises 25 new development 88 BE4 New build live work units 27 W4 Protecting trees and hedgerows 90 BE5 High street service frontages 29 BE6 Railway related development 32 8. Climate Change BE7 Safeguarding employment uses 34 CC1 Renewable and low carbon 93 energy 4. Community Facilities CC2 Flood risk 96 C1 Elderly care accommodation 37 C2 Existing community facilities 40 C3 New or Improved community Facilities 42 APPENDIX 1 C4 New and Improved utility service Special qualities of the Yorkshire Dales infrastructure 43 National Park C5 Infrastructure needed to support development 45 C6 Protected green space 47 C7 Waste 49 5. Landscape L1 Design 51 L2 Heritage assets – general Principles 53 L3 Heritage assets – individual requirements 55 L4 Conversion of traditional buildings general requirements 58 L5 Conversion of traditional buildings principle of use 59 L6 Alteration of traditional farm Buildings 62 L7 Enabling development 64 L8 Crushed rock quarrying 66 L9 Building stone 69 L10 Reworking mineral waste 70 L11 Mineral and railhead safeguarding 71 Introduction Draft Yorkshire Dales Local Plan June 2014 1.1 The Yorkshire Dales Local Plan is a strategy for new development in the National Park between 2015 and 2030.
    [Show full text]
  • Electrification October 2009  Foreword
    Network RUS Electrification October 2009 2 Foreword I am pleased to present this Electrification Electrification has a potentially significant role Strategy, which forms part of the Network Route to play in reducing carbon emissions from rail Utilisation Strategy (RUS). The Network RUS transport as well as improving air quality and looks at issues affecting the whole network reducing noise. Electric trains, on average, rather than in specific geographical areas. emit 20 to 30 percent less carbon than diesel trains, and their superior performance in Approximately 40 percent of the network in terms of braking and accelerating can help terms of track miles is currently electrified, reduce journey times. In addition, they provide though several main lines, much of the cross- more seats for passengers, making a greater country network, as well as key freight links contribution to increasing the overall capacity of and diversionary routes remain un-electrified. the railway. Passengers and freight operators This document therefore sets out a potential would also both benefit from an improved longer-term strategic approach to further service in other ways, such as through the electrification of the network. creation of more diversionary routes. Electrification presents a huge opportunity for In England and Wales, two options in particular the industry, for those who use the railway and – the Great Western and Midland Main Lines for the country as a whole. Our analysis shows – are shown to have high benefit to cost ratios. the long-term benefits of electrifying key parts These options, along with key strategic infill of the network, in terms of both reducing its schemes, are both presented in the proposed ongoing cost to the country and improving its strategy.
    [Show full text]