DOCSLIB.ORG

Lancashire and Cumbria Route Utilisation Strategy August 2008

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lancashire and Cumbria Route Utilisation Strategy August 2008 Lancashire and Cumbria Route Utilisation Strategy August 2008 Foreword I am delighted to present Network Rail’s Route There are currently aspirations for a service Utilisation Strategy (RUS) for Lancashire and between Southport, Preston and Ormskirk. Cumbria, which considers issues affecting This is partly facilitated by work to enhance the railway in this part of the country over the track and signalling between Preston and next decade and gives a view on longer-term Ormskirk, which will allow a standard hourly issues in the years beyond. service pattern with improved journey times but without the need for more rolling stock. Getting to this stage has involved following a now well-established process. However, there Services into Sellafield during peak hours are two key differences with this strategy. suffer from overcrowding, though Northern The first is that no part of the area it covers Rail’s anticipated service from December is the responsibility of either a Passenger 2008 will address that to a degree. It is Transport Executive or a regional body with important services on this route firstly cater public transport responsibilities. Secondly, for peak traffic at Sellafield and Barrow, with the challenge usually faced when producing services outside the peak being on as close a RUS, that of insufficient capacity to meet to an hourly pattern as possible. current or future demand, is not a major A number of consultation responses were problem here. As a result, this strategy received regarding a direct service between focuses on how to make the best use of Manchester and Burnley, including a report what is already available. carried out on behalf of Lancashire County A range of factors have influenced this Council and Burnley Borough Council. strategy’s development. Notable among these As a result of that report, and potential options is the development of the December 2008 for delivery of High Level Output Specification timetable on the West Coast Main Line, which peak capacity requirements in Manchester, we presents real opportunities for improvements, have identified that there could be a case for a particularly in terms of some of the physical direct service, although further work is needed and timetabling interchanges. In addition, there to confirm the impact of issues affecting the are the aspirations of stakeholders and the business case and sources of funding. responses received to the consultation. This RUS was initially published as a Draft Overall, the RUS looks to move timetables for Consultation in April 2008, and I would towards a more regular pattern with good like to thank all those who responded. Its connections and better station facilities. production has been led by Network Rail, As an example, it recommends a number but it has been developed by the whole of small investments at Preston, Carlisle, industry. A large number of organisations, Ormskirk, Blackburn and Burscough Junction including our customers, the passenger and to improve interchanges. freight operators, have been fully involved and I would like to thank them all for their efforts. Iain Coucher Chief Executive Executive summary Introduction The RUS broadly covers the railway north of This Lancashire and Cumbria RUS has the line between Preston and Burnley as far as followed the now well-established RUS Carlisle, with the exception of the West Coast process, which includes extensive involvement Main Line (WCML), and lines east of Skipton. of stakeholders. However, it differs from It considers issues over a 10-year time period previous RUSs in two important ways. from 2008 whilst giving a view on issues that Firstly, the RUS geography is not covered could arise within a 0-year horizon. by a Passenger Transport Executive (PTE) The geography of the RUS is bisected by or regional body with specific transport the WCML, the RUS for which is now being responsibilities. Secondly, the familiar RUS scoped, and adjoins routes covered by the gap of ‘insufficient capacity to meet current Scotland and North West RUSs which have or future demand’ is not a major problem been established, and the Merseyside and facing rail in Lancashire and Cumbria. By Yorkshire and Humber RUSs which are comparison, services typically have low still underway. patronage and the infrastructure is relatively expensive (eg. due to the numerous viaducts Process and sea defences). This RUS is hence The RUS primarily considers the next 10 mainly focussed on making the best use years, but has also taken account of the of the available network and resources. Government’s 2007 White Paper “Delivering Nevertheless, there are a number of minor a Sustainable Railway” to give a 0-year investment options that have a reasonable context. The RUS has examined the current business case. and future freight and passenger markets and assessed the predicted growth in each. Scope and background It has sought to accommodate this growth The Lancashire and Cumbria RUS adjoins effectively and efficiently, in accordance with the infrastructure covered by the recently the route utilisation objective specified in published North West RUS and a number Licence Condition 7. It has also looked at of the Stakeholder Management Group stakeholder aspirations, particularly those of (SMG) are common to both RUSs. It has local authorities and regional bodies, and has been recognised that many of the issues taken account of responses to the RUS Draft in Lancashire and Cumbria are relatively for Consultation. minor when compared with Manchester and surrounding area, especially in terms of Development work on the December 2008 capacity. It has hence been useful to treat timetable, Northern Rail’s view of how to Lancashire and Cumbria separately, as it address High Level Output Specification has allowed us the opportunity to adjust the (HLOS) metrics in Leeds and Manchester, zoom lens to see this piece of railway in the and option analysis for the Yorkshire and appropriate context and scale. Humber RUS, have all evolved in parallel as this RUS was being developed. Consequently, some of the recommendations in this RUS are conditional or cross-referenced to other planning activities. The Lancashire and Cumbria RUS process key social infrastructure and major economic is overseen and directed by the SMG which centres is generally more limited than in other comprises representatives from passenger parts of the RUS area. operators, freight operators, the Department Rail services are not well integrated with for Transport (DfT), Network Rail, ATOC, the local tourism market. In conjunction with Passenger Focus and the Office of Rail colleagues from Passenger Focus, the RUS Regulation (ORR) (as observers). has identified the main tourist markets and Gaps attractions on the route. Despite a number of The RUS identified seven generic gaps which these being situated in close proximity to a the recommended options address. These are: railway station, they are generally on lightly used parts of the route where rail services Inter/intra regional links are typically are typically infrequent and not on a regular poor. Rail links between some of the main interval. As a consequence rail is unattractive conurbations in the RUS area, and links to tourists, particularly at popular times such between these conurbations and other as weekends. sizeable destinations in the North West and beyond are poor relative to other The capability of the network in some broadly equivalent parts of the UK network. areas constrains service improvements Specific problems include infrequent services, and future needs. Slow maximum line short operating days and a lack of direct speeds and permanent speed restrictions journey opportunities. are spread throughout the route and are a serious constraint to improved journey times, The rail service is unattractive to increased service frequencies and better commuters. There are a number of areas train performance. In many instances the where the potential commuter market may constraint on improvement is infrastructure be suppressed. Reasons for this include lack capability rather than rolling stock capability. of direct rail services, infrequent or poorly Some of these restrictions are freight specific, timed services, last trains not late enough to or load specific. Parts of the RUS area have provide a reliable return journey, slow journey restrictive loading gauge clearance, which times, insufficient on-train capacity (in a limited reduces the suitability of lines as diversionary number of cases), lack of car parking provision routes for the West Coast Main Line. Key and poor access to railway stations. capacity pinch-points on the network, such Rail may be able to play a bigger role in as single lead junctions, single line sections alleviating social deprivation. The RUS area and long signal sections, make increasing the includes a number of deprived areas. These frequency of passenger and freight services typically have low levels of rail patronage per difficult and expensive. Carlisle has a rather head of population. A number of deprived restrictive layout and is the point where West communities on the route have an infrequent Coast traffic and Ayrshire – Yorkshire/Midlands rail service to a limited number of destinations, coal traffic interact and is hence a significant as the potential for a sizeable rail market is constraint on capacity. On certain route unclear. This means that the accessibility of sections, regular and lengthy possessions for maintenance and renewals are required Many of the recommendations are reliant on to keep the infrastructure fit for purpose. additional rolling stock being available in order This can be disruptive to passenger and to provide longer or more frequent trains. freight operations. Consequently the practicality of taking forward these recommendations will be dependent on Performance of a number of train services the process for deploying rolling stock, taking is poor. Similar to the previous gap, parts of into account the priority likely to be given to the network exhibit poor train performance.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Derwent Valley Line
    Prices correct at November 2018 November at correct Prices (Newark) – Nottingham – Derby – Matlock – Derby – Nottingham – (Newark) derbyshire.gov.uk/bline long as one end of your journey is in Derbyshire. in is journey your of end one as long © Matt Jones Matt © . Receive 25% off local train fares as as fares train local off 25% Receive 01629 533190 01629 Derbyshire Call Derbyshire b_line Card Holders Holders Card b_line Derbyshire This publication is available in other formats from from formats other in available is publication This most local bus services (Wayfarer cannot be purchased on the train). the on purchased be cannot (Wayfarer services bus local most eastmidlandstrains.co.uk/derwentvalleyline and other staffed stations, from Tourist Information Centres and on on and Centres Information Tourist from stations, staffed other and 01629 538062 538062 01629 for seniors or child. Tickets can be purchased at Derby, Long Eaton Eaton Long Derby, at purchased be can Tickets child. or seniors for Hall Matlock DE4 3AG. 3AG. DE4 Matlock Hall except on Sundays. Adult tickets £13.00 including one child, £6.50 £6.50 child, one including £13.00 tickets Adult Sundays. on except Council, Economy, Transport and Communities Department, County County Department, Communities and Transport Economy, Council, travel before 0900 Monday to Saturday or on the Transpeak bus bus Transpeak the on or Saturday to Monday 0900 before travel Derwent Valley Line Community Rail Partnership, Derbyshire County County Derbyshire Partnership, Rail Community Line Valley Derwent train services in Derbyshire and the Peak District. Not valid for rail rail for valid Not District. Peak the and Derbyshire in services train day rover tickets are valid on most bus and and bus most on valid are tickets rover day Derbyshire Wayfarer Derbyshire tourism and railway organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Rail in the North COMMUNITY RAIL in the NORTH
    Community rail in the North COMMUNITY RAIL IN THE NORTH Community rail is a unique and growing movement comprising more than 70 community rail partnerships and 1,000 volunteer groups across Britain that help communities get the most from their railways. It is about engaging local people at grassroots level to promote social inclusion, sustainable and healthy travel, Community groups on the Northern wellbeing, economic development, and tourism. network have always been at the This involves working with train operators, local “ forefront of community engagement. authorities, and other partners to highlight local needs An increasing number of communities and opportunities, ensuring communities have a voice and individuals are benefitting from in rail and transport development. “ initiatives and projects that break down barriers, foster a more inclusive Community rail is evidenced to contribute high levels society, and build foundations for a of social, environmental, and economic value to local more sustainable future. areas, and countless stations have been transformed into hubs at the heart of the communities they serve. Carolyn Watson, Northern Evidence also shows community rail delivering life-changing benefits for individuals and families, helping people access new opportunities through sustainable travel by rail. The movement is currently looking to play a key role in the recovery of our communities post-COVID, helping them build back better and greener. The North in numbers: 20 Working along railway lines, with community industry partners, to engage local rail communities. Partnerships stretch partnerships from the Tyne Valley in Northumberland Each Year Giving (CRPs) down to Crewe in Cheshire. 0 140,000 0 Hours 350 Voluntary groups bringing stations into the heart of communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Directory of Resources
    SETTLE – CARLISLE RAILWAY DIRECTORY OF RESOURCES A listing of printed, audio-visual and other resources including museums, public exhibitions and heritage sites * * * Compiled by Nigel Mussett 2016 Petteril Bridge Junction CARLISLE SCOTBY River Eden CUMWHINTON COTEHILL Cotehill viaduct Dry Beck viaduct ARMATHWAITE Armathwaite viaduct Armathwaite tunnel Baron Wood tunnels 1 (south) & 2 (north) LAZONBY & KIRKOSWALD Lazonby tunnel Eden Lacy viaduct LITTLE SALKELD Little Salkeld viaduct + Cross Fell 2930 ft LANGWATHBY Waste Bank Culgaith tunnel CULGAITH Crowdundle viaduct NEWBIGGIN LONG MARTON Long Marton viaduct APPLEBY Ormside viaduct ORMSIDE Helm tunnel Griseburn viaduct Crosby Garrett viaduct CROSBY GARRETT Crosby Garrett tunnel Smardale viaduct KIRKBY STEPHEN Birkett tunnel Wild Boar Fell 2323 ft + Ais Gill viaduct Shotlock Hill tunnel Lunds viaduct Moorcock tunnel Dandry Mire viaduct Mossdale Head tunnel GARSDALE Appersett Gill viaduct Mossdale Gill viaduct HAWES Rise Hill tunnel DENT Arten Gill viaduct Blea Moor tunnel Dent Head viaduct Whernside 2415 ft + Ribblehead viaduct RIBBLEHEAD + Penyghent 2277 ft Ingleborough 2372 ft + HORTON IN RIBBLESDALE Little viaduct Ribble Bridge Sheriff Brow viaduct Taitlands tunnel Settle viaduct Marshfield viaduct SETTLE Settle Junction River Ribble © NJM 2016 Route map of the Settle—Carlisle Railway and the Hawes Branch GRADIENT PROFILE Gargrave to Carlisle After The Cumbrian Railways Association ’The Midland’s Settle & Carlisle Distance Diagrams’ 1992. CONTENTS Route map of the Settle-Carlisle Railway Gradient profile Introduction A. Primary Sources B. Books, pamphlets and leaflets C. Periodicals and articles D. Research Studies E. Maps F. Pictorial images: photographs, postcards, greetings cards, paintings and posters G. Audio-recordings: records, tapes and CDs H. Audio-visual recordings: films, videos and DVDs I.
    [Show full text]
  • Rail North West
    Rail North West A Class 350 service sits in platform 3 at Oxenholme, perhaps saying how things could have been if the Windermere line had been electrified. Photo courtesy Lakes Line Rail Users Association/ Malcolm Conway Timetable Chaos Caused by Electrification Delay and Cancellation A week of cancellations and delays at meaning a large number of services the start of the new timetable on May needed re-planning to operate with 20th has led to calls by the Mayor of available units, though insufficient Manchester Andy Burnham and the drivers trained on units new to routes Mayor of the Liverpool City Region, (e.g. electric trains to Blackpool North) Steve Rotherham for Northern to be has added to the issue. stripped of its franchise if improvements weren’t made. The Lakes Line between Oxenholme and Windermere is feeling the effects of The disruption was caused primarily by the failure to electrify that line. The delays to the Manchester – Preston replacement bi-mode trains aren’t electrification, and cancellation of ready, but Northern has received some Oxenholme to Windermere schemes, Class 158 diesels from Scotland. With a Newsletter of the North West Branch1 of Railfuture — Summer 2018 Rail North West 2 Summer 2018 top speed of 90mph, they are easier to the greatest timetable change for a timetable on the West Coast Main Line generation as the government carries than the current Class 156 and 153 out the biggest modernisation of the rail units. However, the new units will entail network since Victorian times to an extensive driver training programme, improve services for passengers across and their lack of availability is causing the country.” significant cancellations on this line in particular.
    [Show full text]
  • Operational Rail Vehicle Strategy 2019-2034 Operational Rail Vehicle Strategy 2019-2034
    OPERATIONAL RAIL VEHICLE STRATEGY 2019-2034 OPERATIONAL RAIL VEHICLE STRATEGY 2019-2034 INTRODUCTION The Science Museum Group (SMG) through the National Railway Museum (NRM) owns the largest fleet of operating historic locomotives in the United Kingdom, so it’s essential that we have a strategy to ensure the most effective and efficient use of these vehicles. The NRM, Locomotion and Science & Industry Museum in Manchester (SIM) will continue to operate a select number of rail vehicles from our collection. Showing our collections in action is one of the most direct tools we have to share our key values with visitors: revealing wonder, igniting curiosity and sharing authentic stories. What’s more, our visitors expect a train ride. We need to meet that expectation whilst managing our collection in the most professional and responsible manner. A commercially viable and deliverable plan will see a core selection of operating vehicles at York and Locomotion within the maintenance capabilities of teams at those locations. These have been chosen for reasons of accessibility, affordability, income potential, attractiveness to visitors, practicality of operation and sustainable repair as well as the railway stories they reveal. We use our rail vehicles in various ways with priority always given for static display for our visitors at York and Shildon. Other ways in which we use them are: operation on museum sites; static loans to accredited museums; operating loans to heritage railways; main line operation. Our loans reach diverse audiences across the UK, making the national collection accessible to many. These vehicles are brand ambassadors for our mission of inspiring future engineers and scientists.
    [Show full text]
  • Lancashire and Cumbria Route Utilisation Strategy 2008
    Lancashire and Cumbria Route Utilisation Strategy August 2008 Foreword I am delighted to present Network Rail’s Route There are currently aspirations for a service Utilisation Strategy (RUS) for Lancashire and between Southport, Preston and Ormskirk. Cumbria, which considers issues affecting This is partly facilitated by work to enhance the railway in this part of the country over the track and signalling between Preston and next decade and gives a view on longer-term Ormskirk, which will allow a standard hourly issues in the years beyond. service pattern with improved journey times but without the need for more rolling stock. Getting to this stage has involved following a now well-established process. However, there Services into Sellafield during peak hours are two key differences with this strategy. suffer from overcrowding, though Northern The first is that no part of the area it covers Rail’s anticipated service from December is the responsibility of either a Passenger 2008 will address that to a degree. It is Transport Executive or a regional body with important services on this route firstly cater public transport responsibilities. Secondly, for peak traffic at Sellafield and Barrow, with the challenge usually faced when producing services outside the peak being on as close a RUS, that of insufficient capacity to meet to an hourly pattern as possible. current or future demand, is not a major A number of consultation responses were problem here. As a result, this strategy received regarding a direct service between focuses on how to make the best use of Manchester and Burnley, including a report what is already available.
    [Show full text]
  • Transpennine Express and Northern Rail Franchise Renewals Stakeholder Consultation
    APPENDIX 3 TransPennine Express and Northern Rail Franchise Renewals Stakeholder Consultation Response from the Furness Line Community Rail Partnership Contents 1. Summary of Key Points 2. Background 3. Existing Services 4. CRP Preparation for Consultation 5. The Consultation Principles and Proposals 6. Key Response Points from the Furness Line Community Rail Partnership 7. Answers to Consultation Questions Annex A Furness Line Study by The Railway Consultancy Annex B Fares comparison 1. Summary of Key Points 1.1 The current service on the Furness Line is unfit for purpose: o there is a strong case for the retention, and restoration of previous levels of service between Barrow-in-Furness and Manchester Airport; o local services on the line are failing to provide for key markets, particularly commuters wishing to travel west towards Barrow and Ulverston; o the timetable is uncoordinated and irregular and fails to provide adequate capacity at key times. 1.2 Remapping, with potential loss of through services to Manchester, will result in: o over-crowding of TransPennine Scottish services south of Lancaster; o uncertainty of connections at Preston/Lancaster, where poor historical reliability results in passengers having to wait an unacceptable hour or more for the next train. o uncertainty of through connectivity with interchanges on the Northern Hub and HS2 developments. 1.3 Maintaining and improving the quality of rolling stock serving the route, especially on longer distance services, is a strong necessity. 1.4 Franchise planning needs to provide for massive growth in the local economy: o up to ??? new jobs in Barrow and Ulverston alone in next few years; o up to £17 billion investment on Cumbrian coast by mid 2020s.
    [Show full text]
  • NRT Index Stations
    Network Rail Timetable OFFICIAL# May 2021 Station Index Station Table(s) A Abbey Wood T052, T200, T201 Aber T130 Abercynon T130 Aberdare T130 Aberdeen T026, T051, T065, T229, T240 Aberdour T242 Aberdovey T076 Abererch T076 Abergavenny T131 Abergele & Pensarn T081 Aberystwyth T076 Accrington T041, T097 Achanalt T239 Achnasheen T239 Achnashellach T239 Acklington T048 Acle T015 Acocks Green T071 Acton Bridge T091 Acton Central T059 Acton Main Line T117 Adderley Park T068 Addiewell T224 Addlestone T149 Adisham T212 Adlington (cheshire) T084 Adlington (lancashire) T082 Adwick T029, T031 Aigburth T103 Ainsdale T103 Aintree T105 Airbles T225 Airdrie T226 Albany Park T200 Albrighton T074 Alderley Edge T082, T084 Aldermaston T116 Aldershot T149, T155 Aldrington T188 Alexandra Palace T024 Alexandra Parade T226 Alexandria T226 Alfreton T034, T049, T053 Allens West T044 Alloa T230 Alness T239 Alnmouth For Alnwick T026, T048, T051 Alresford (essex) T011 Alsager T050, T067 Althorne T006 Page 1 of 53 Network Rail Timetable OFFICIAL# May 2021 Station Index Station Table(s) Althorpe T029 A Altnabreac T239 Alton T155 Altrincham T088 Alvechurch T069 Ambergate T056 Amberley T186 Amersham T114 Ammanford T129 Ancaster T019 Anderston T225, T226 Andover T160 Anerley T177, T178 Angmering T186, T188 Annan T216 Anniesland T226, T232 Ansdell & Fairhaven T097 Apperley Bridge T036, T037 Appleby T042 Appledore (kent) T192 Appleford T116 Appley Bridge T082 Apsley T066 Arbroath T026, T051, T229 Ardgay T239 Ardlui T227 Ardrossan Harbour T221 Ardrossan South Beach T221
    [Show full text]
  • The Settle-Carlisle Walking Festival Spring Is a Crucial Time of Year for Wildlife and Livestock in the Yorkshire Dales
    ride2stride Printed by: Briggs Bros. (Silsden) Ltd, Cononley, W Yorks. W Cononley, Ltd, (Silsden) Bros. Briggs by: Printed www.ride2stride.org.uk For up-to-date information check out: check information up-to-date For LEEDS Information abouttheSettle-CarlisleLinecanbefoundonlineat or telephoneNationalRailEnquirieson Train Timetables areavailablefromstationsalongtheline Timetables Train Information Train resulting from any event in this programme. this in event any from resulting Apperley Bridge Apperley BRADFORD for any loss, damage, injury or inconvenience inconvenience or injury damage, loss, any for Shipley Frizinghall accept responsibility for any errors or omissions or or omissions or errors any for responsibility accept Saltaire as advertised, the Festival Committee cannot cannot Committee Festival the advertised, as Bingley information herein is accurate and the events are are events the and accurate is herein information Crossflatts Airedale services Airedale Whilst every effort is made to ensure the the ensure to made is effort every Whilst Keighley Not all trains stop trains all Not Committee who produce this programme. programme. this produce who Committee -aweeklongfestivalofwalks,talksandmusic Steeton & Silsden & Steeton All trains stop trains All The festival is co-ordinated by an ad-hoc Festival Festival ad-hoc an by co-ordinated is festival The and activities, all organised by different groups. groups. different by organised all activities, and Cononley The festival programme is made up of lots of events events of lots of up made is programme festival The Services Skipton Dales Rail Dales Lancashire responsibilty. Gargrave your comfort and safety are your own own your are safety and comfort your 08457 484950 Please remember on led walks - walks led on remember Please Hellifield sure you'll have a great time.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Rail Report
    Community Rail Report Author: Jerry Swift, Interim Project Manager Date: August 2016 Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2 1.1 Committed obligations 2 1.2 Director's foreword 6 1.3 Executive Summary 7 2. Community Rail Report 8 2.1 Introduction to the report 8 2.2 Community and Sustainability Director’s report 8 2.2.1 Community Rail Partnerships 8 2.2.2 Funding for Community Rail Partnerships 8 2.2.3 Community Rail Partnership funding 9 2.2.4 Additional funding to support community rail 10 2.2.5 ComREG 11 2.2.6 Station adoption 12 2.2.7 Community Rail Partnerships 12 2.2.8 Volunteering 12 2.2.9 Working with communities 12 2.2.10 Growth in passenger numbers 13 2.2.11 The CRPs in their own words 13 3. Community Rail Partnership profiles 14 3.1 Settle & Carlisle Railway Development Company (SCRDC) 15 3.2 Leeds-Morecambe Community Rail Partnership (The Bentham Line) 17 3.3 Barton-Cleethorpes Community Rail Partnership 19 3.4 Yorkshire Coast Community Rail Partnership (YCCRP) 20 3.5 Penistone Line Community Rail Partnership 22 3.6 Bishop Line Community Rail Partnership 24 3.7 Tyne Valley Community Rail Partnership 26 3.8 Esk Valley Railway Development Company 28 3.9 South Fylde Line Community Rail Partnership 29 3.10 West of Lancashire Community Rail Partnership (WofLCRP) 31 3.11 Cumbrian Coast Line Community Rail Partnership 33 3.12 Furness Line Community Rail Partnership 35 3.13 Lakes Line Community Rail Partnership 37 3.14 North Cheshire Rail Users Group 39 3.15 Mid Cheshire Community Rail Partnership 40 3.16 East Lancashire Community Rail Partnership 42 3.17 Clitheroe Line Community Rail Partnership (CLCRP) 44 3.18 South East Manchester Community Rail Partnership 46 3.19 Crewe to Manchester Community Rail Partnership 48 3.20 High Peak and Hope Valley Community Rail Partnership 50 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Rail Report
    Community Rail Report Author: Carolyn Watson Date: 31 March 2017 Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2 1.1 Foreword 2 1.2 Executive Summary 3 2. Community Rail Report 4 2.1 Introduction to the Report 4 2.1.1 Community Rail Partnerships 4 2.1.2 Funding for Community Rail Partnerships 4 2.1.3 Community Rail Partnership Funding Table 1 5 2.1.4 Community Rail Executive Group (ComREG) 6 2.1.5 Community Rail Conference 6 2.1.6 Seed Corn Fund – Kick-starting new ideas 6 2.1.7 Association of Community Rail Partnerships (ACoRP) - Partnership delivery 8 2.1.8 Community Rail Lancashire (CRL) - Developing Engagement Through Education 9 2.1.9 Station Adoption Scheme 10 2.1.10 Northern Franchise/Arriva Strategy - Working with Communities 12 2.1.11 The Community Rail Partnerships 13 3. Community Rail Partnership profiles 14 3.1 Settle - Carlisle Railway Development Company 14 3.2 Leeds - Morecambe Community Rail Partnership 16 3.3 Barton - Cleethorpes Community Rail Partnership 18 3.4 Yorkshire Coast Community Rail Partnership 19 3.5 Penistone Line Community Rail Partnership 20 3.6 Bishop Line Community Rail Partnership 22 3.7 Tyne Valley Community Rail Partnership 24 3.8 Esk Valley Railway Development Company 26 3.9 South Fylde Line Community Rail Partnership 28 3.10 West of Lancashire Community Rail Partnership 30 3.11 Cumbrian Coast Line Community Rail Partnership 32 3.12 Furness Line Community Rail Partnership 34 3.13 Lakes Line Community Rail Partnership 36 3.14 North Cheshire Rail Users Group 38 3.15 Mid Cheshire Community Rail Partnership 39 3.16 East Lancashire Community Rail Partnership 41 3.17 Clitheroe Line Community Rail Partnership 43 3.18 South East Manchester Community Rail Partnership 45 3.19 Crewe to Manchester Community Rail Partnership 47 3.20 High Peak and Hope Valley Community Rail Partnership 49 4.
    [Show full text]
  • LMS Stations: Furness Railway, North Staffordshire Railway and Other Lesser English Companies
    LMS Stations: Furness Railway, North Staffordshire Railway and other lesser English Companies LENS OF SUTTON ASSOCIATION List 18C (Issue 1 Dec 2017) Whitehaven, Bransty 1930s (13830) LMS Stations: Smaller English Companies The following list of station views from the Lens of Sutton collection includes a number of small pregrouping lines, notably the North Staffordshire Railway (NSR), a compact system around Stoke-on-Trent and the Potteries and the Furness (FR) and Maryport & Carlisle (M&CR) railways, which operated the present-day Cumbrian Coast Line between Carnforth and Carlisle. The Cleator & Workington (C&WJ) and Whitehaven Cleator & Egremont lines are also included, the WC&E being a joint Furness and London & North Western undertaking (FUR/LNWR). The list also includes the jointly-owned Cockermouth Keswick & Penrith route (CK&PR), the narrow gauge Ravenglass & Eskdale Railway (R&ER). There are also a number of minor west coast railways included such as the Wirral Railway (WIRRAL), the Garstang and Knott End Railway (G&KE), the Liverpool Overhead Railway (LOR), the Mersey Railway (MERSEY). Finally this list also includes from the Stratford-upon-Avon & Midland Junction Railway (SMJ). Minor West Coast Railways 12990 C&WJ Keekle Halt General view, LMS period, by Professor Fordyce. 36071 C&WJ Moresby Parks View from bridge, circa 1930s, showing the up and down platforms and station buildings. 12987 C&WJ Workington Central Pregrouping view, circa 1912. 12992 C&WJ Workington Central General view, LMS period, by Professor Fordyce. 39614 G&KE Garstang General view, circa 1910, showing Hudswell Clarke 0-6-0ST Jubilee Queen alongside the platform. 39616 G&KE Garstang Detailed view, showing Manning Wardle 2-6-0T Blackpool (works No.1747).
    [Show full text]