DOCSLIB.ORG

Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2018 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Lee County, Florida Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2018 Lee County, Florida Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2018 Prepared by: General Accounting Office, Finance & Records Department Clerk to Board of County Commissioners Linda Doggett Lee County, Florida PRINCIPAL OFFICIALS As of September 30, 2018 Elected Officials Board of County Commissioners, Port Commissioners: Commissioner, District 1 …………………………………… John Manning Commissioner, District 2 …………………………………… Cecil Pendergrass * ** Commissioner, District 3 …………………………………… Larry Kiker Commissioner, District 4 …………………………………… Brian Hamman Commissioner, District 5 …………………………………… Frank Mann Appointed Officials County Manager ………………………………………………… Roger Desjarlais County Attorney ………………………………………………… Richard Wm. Wesch Executive Director, Port Authority ………………………………Jeff A. Mulder Hearing Examiner(s) ………………………………………………Donna Marie Collins Laura Belflower * Chairman for Board of County Commissioners ** Chairman for Board of Port Commissioners Photographs provided by Ed Clement Photographic Services, Inc., Lee County Public Resources, Lee County Visitor & Convention Bureau, Lee County Port Authority, Lee County Water & Wastewater System, Lee County Solid Waste System, Lee County Transportation Facilities, and Lee County Transit. ii Lee County, Florida COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT September 30, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introductory Section PAGE Letter of Transmittal …………………………………………………………………………………………… 2 Organizational Charts ………………………………………………………………………………………… 9 Government Finance Officers Association Certificate of Achievement ………………………………… 11 Financial Section Independent Auditors' Report ……………………………………………………………………………… 14 Management's Discussion and Analysis (unaudited) ……………………………………………………… 17 Basic Financial Statements Government-Wide Financial Statements Statement of Net Position ……………………………………………………………………….……………… 30 Statement of Activities ……………………………………………………………...…………………………… 33 Fund Financial Statements Governmental Fund Financial Statements Balance Sheet- Governmental Funds……………………………………………………………..………… 34 Reconciliation of the Balance Sheet of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Net Position……… 35 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances- Governmental Funds………………………………………………………………… 36 Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities.………..…………..…… 37 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance- Budget (Non-GAAP Budgetary Basis) and Actual- General Fund…………….…………………… 38 Proprietary Fund Financial Statements Statement of Net Position- Proprietary Funds …………………………………………………………… 39 Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position- Proprietary Funds …….………… 42 Statement of Cash Flows- Proprietary Funds ………………………………………………….………… 44 Fiduciary Fund Statements Statement of Fiduciary Net Position- Agency Funds ……………………………………….…………… 46 Notes to the Financial Statements ………………………………………………………….……………………..… 48 Required Supplementary Information Other Postemployment Benefits Plans (unaudited) - Schedule of Total OPEB liability - Group Health Program for Lee County Plan and Lee County Sheriff Health Care Plan…………………………………… 100 Florida Retirement System Pension Plan - Schedule of the County's Proportionate Share of the Net Pension Liability and Schedule of the County Contributions…………………………………………… 101 Retiree Health Insurance Subsidy Program - Schedule of the County's Proportionate Share of the Net Pension Liability and Schedule of the County Contributions…………………………………………… 102 iii Lee County, Florida COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT September 30, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Supplemental Financial Information PAGE General Fund Combining Schedules Balance Sheet …………………………………………...………………………..…………………………………… 106 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances …………………….…………………… 108 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances- Budget (Non-GAAP Budgetary Basis) and Actual……….……………………………….…………………… 110 Non-Major Governmental Funds Combining Statements and Schedules Non-Major Governmental Fund Descriptions ……………………………………………...……………………… 114 Balance Sheet …………………………………………………………….…………………………………………… 117 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances ……………...………………………… 126 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances- Budget (Non-GAAP Budgetary Basis) and Actual- Special Revenue Funds ……………………………… 136 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances- Budget (Non-GAAP Budgetary Basis) and Actual- Debt Service Funds ……………………………..…… 143 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances- Budget (Non-GAAP Budgetary Basis) and Actual- Capital Projects Funds ………………………..……… 145 Enterprise Funds Combining Schedule Enterprise Fund Descriptions …………………...……………………………………………………………….…… 152 Schedule of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position- Budget (Non-GAAP Budgetary Basis) and Actual with Reconciliation to GAAP………………..………… 153 Internal Service Funds Combining Statements and Schedule Internal Service Fund Descriptions …………………………………………………………………….…………… 156 Statement of Net Position …………………………………………………………………...………………………… 157 Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position …………….………..………………………… 159 Statement of Cash Flows ……………………………………………………….………………………..…………… 160 Schedule of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position- Budget (Non-GAAP Budgetary Basis) and Actual with Reconciliation to GAAP……………...………… 162 Agency Funds Combining Statements Agency Fund Descriptions …………………………………………………………………...……………………… 166 Statement of Fiduciary Net Position- Agency Funds………………………..……………………………………… 167 Statement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities- Agency Funds………………...………………………………… 170 iv Lee County, Florida COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT September 30, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Statistical Section (unaudited) PAGE Statistical Section Descriptions ……………………………………………………………………………………… 174 Schedule 1- Net Position………………..……………………………………………………………………………… 175 Schedule 2- Changes in Net Position………………………………………………………………………………… 176 Schedule 3- Fund Balances of Governmental Funds……………………………………………………………… 178 Schedule 4- Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds………………………………………………… 179 Schedule 5- Assessed Value and Estimated Actual Value of Taxable Property………………………………… 180 Schedule 6- Property Tax Rates- Direct and Overlapping Governments………………………………………… 181 Schedule 7- Principal Property Taxpayers…………………………………………………………………………… 182 Schedule 8- Property Tax Levies and Collections…………………………………………………………………… 183 Schedule 9- Ratio of Outstanding Debt by Type…………………………………………………………………… 184 Schedule 10- Pledged Revenue Bond Coverage…………………………………………………………………… 185 Schedule 11- Demographic and Economic Statistics……………………………………………………………… 187 Schedule 12- Principal Employers…………………………………………………………………………………… 188 Schedule 13- Government Employees by Function/Program…………………………………………………… 189 Schedule 14- Operating Indicators by Function/Program………………………………………………………… 190 Schedule 15- Capital Asset Statistics by Function…………………………………………………………………… 191 Other Supplemental Information (unaudited) Tourist Development Tax Revenue Bonds- Historical Tourist Development Tax Revenues, Gross Revenues and State Funds and Pro Forma Debt Service Coverage …………………….…………… 194 Tourist Development Tax Revenue Bonds- Statement of Historical Collections and Distributions of the General Sales and Use Tax……………………………………………………………….…………………… 195 Non-Ad Valorem Revenue Bonds- Historical Major Sources of Non-Ad Valorem Revenues……….………… 196 Non-Ad Valorem Revenue Bonds- Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances- Total Governmental Funds……………………………..……………..……………………………… 197 Lee County Water and Wastewater Systems- Monthly Water Rates …………………………………………… 198 Lee County Water and Wastewater Systems- Water Restriction Surcharge Adjustment ……………………… 198 Lee County Water and Wastewater Systems- Monthly Wastewater Rates ……………………………………… 199 Lee County Water and Wastewater Systems- Connection Fees ……………………………………………...…… 199 Lee County Water and Wastewater Systems- Water Meter Installation and Service Connection Fees……… 199 Lee County Water and Wastewater Systems- Historical Revenues, Expenses and Debt Service Coverage ……………………………………………………………………………...……...…… 200 Lee County Water and Wastewater Systems- Customer Statistics……………………………………………… 202 Lee County Water and Wastewater Systems- County System Top Ten Retail Utility Customers…………… 203 Lee County Solid Waste System- System Historical Operating Results and Indenture Rate Covenant Compliance…………………………………………………………………………………………… 204 Lee County Solid Waste System-Summary of Historical Charges …………………………………………..…… 205 v Lee County, Florida COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT September 30, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Other Supplemental Information (continued) (unaudited) PAGE Lee County Solid Waste System- Summary of Historical Inbound Waste Deliveries (Tons) by Type of Waste…………………………………………………………………………………..….……………… 206 Lee County Solid Waste System- Summary of Historical Waste-to-Energy (WTE) Processing Satistics……… 207 Lee County Transportation Facilities- Toll Rates ………………………………………………………………..… 208 Lee County Transportation Facilities- Variable Pricing Program ………………………………………………… 210 Lee County Transportation Facilities- Traffic, Revenues and Expenses by Bridge……………………………… 211
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Should Florida Toll Agencies Be Consolidated? by Robert W
    Policy Study 401 February 2012 Should Florida Toll Agencies Be Consolidated? by Robert W. Poole, Jr. and Daryl S. Fleming, Ph.D., PE Reason Foundation Reason Foundation’s mission is to advance a free society by developing, applying and pro- moting libertarian principles, including individual liberty, free markets and the rule of law. We use journalism and public policy research to influence the frameworks and actions of policymakers, journalists and opinion leaders. Reason Foundation’s nonpartisan public policy research promotes choice, competition and a dynamic market economy as the foundation for human dignity and progress. Reason produces rigorous, peer-reviewed research and directly engages the policy process, seeking strategies that emphasize cooperation, flexibility, local knowledge and results. Through practical and innovative approaches to complex problems, Reason seeks to change the way people think about issues, and promote policies that allow and encourage individu- als and voluntary institutions to flourish. Reason Foundation is a tax-exempt research and education organization as defined under IRS code 501(c)(3). Reason Foundation is supported by voluntary contributions from individuals, foundations and corporations. Acknowledgement This project was supported by a grant to Reason Foundation from Associated Industries of Florida. The analysis, findings and recommendations in this report are entirely those of the authors. Copyright © 2012 Reason Foundation. All rights reserved. Reason Foundation Should Florida Toll Agencies Be Consolidated? By Robert W. Poole, Jr. and Daryl S. Fleming, Ph.D., PE Executive Summary The 2011 Florida legislative session saw several proposals that would have consolidated some or all of the local toll authorities into the Florida Turnpike Enterprise (FTE).
    [Show full text]
  • Toll Roads in the United States: History and Current Policy
    TOLL FACILITIES IN THE UNITED STATES Bridges - Roads - Tunnels - Ferries August 2009 Publication No: FHWA-PL-09-00021 Internet: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim/tollpage.htm Toll Roads in the United States: History and Current Policy History The early settlers who came to America found a land of dense wilderness, interlaced with creeks, rivers, and streams. Within this wilderness was an extensive network of trails, many of which were created by the migration of the buffalo and used by the Native American Indians as hunting and trading routes. These primitive trails were at first crooked and narrow. Over time, the trails were widened, straightened and improved by settlers for use by horse and wagons. These became some of the first roads in the new land. After the American Revolution, the National Government began to realize the importance of westward expansion and trade in the development of the new Nation. As a result, an era of road building began. This period was marked by the development of turnpike companies, our earliest toll roads in the United States. In 1792, the first turnpike was chartered and became known as the Philadelphia and Lancaster Turnpike in Pennsylvania. It was the first road in America covered with a layer of crushed stone. The boom in turnpike construction began, resulting in the incorporation of more than 50 turnpike companies in Connecticut, 67 in New York, and others in Massachusetts and around the country. A notable turnpike, the Boston-Newburyport Turnpike, was 32 miles long and cost approximately $12,500 per mile to construct. As the Nation grew, so did the need for improved roads.
    [Show full text]
  • Lee County, Florida; Toll Roads Bridges
    Summary: Lee County, Florida; Toll Roads Bridges Primary Credit Analyst: Anita Pancholy, Dallas (1) 214-871-1402; [email protected] Secondary Contact: Joseph J Pezzimenti, New York (1) 212-438-2038; [email protected] Table Of Contents Rationale Outlook Related Criteria And Research WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT JULY 3, 2012 1 984454 | 300417279 Summary: Lee County, Florida; Toll Roads Bridges Credit Profile Lee Cnty toll rev Unenhanced Rating A-(SPUR)/Stable Affirmed Lee Cnty toll rev (CIFG) Unenhanced Rating A-(SPUR)/Stable Affirmed Many issues are enhanced by bond insurance. Rationale Standard & Poor's Ratings Services affirmed its 'A-' rating on Lee County, Fla.'s transportation facilities revenue bonds. The outlook is stable. The rating reflects our assessment of the credit profile of a three-bridge system that has stable operating margins, no additional debt needs, and traffic trends that have not yet stabilized. More specifically, the rating reflects what Standard & Poor's considers: • A well-balanced financial operations with the Sanibel Causeway, Cape Coral Bridge, and Midpoint Memorial Bridge representing approximately 37%, 32%, and 31% of fiscal 2011 net revenues, respectively; • A lack of significant competition from toll-free roads, combined with the county's covenant not to build competing facilities unless they will become part of the three-bridge system; and • Historically good senior debt service coverage, which has been no less than 1.7x since 2008, despite lower traffic
    [Show full text]
  • Lee County 2012 Annual Report
    EXHIBIT S Annual Traffic and Revenue Report Fiscal Year 2012 Lee County Toll Facilities Sanibel Causeway Cape Coral Bridge Midpoint Memorial Bridge LEE COUNTY SOUTHWEST FLORIDA Annual Traffic and Revenue Report Fiscal Year 2012 Lee County Toll Facilities April 2013 Sanibel Causeway Cape Coral Bridge Midpoint Memorial Bridge LEE COUNTY SOUTHWEST FLORIDA Lee County Toll Facilities FY 2012 Annual Traffic and Revenue Report TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO THE LEE COUNTY TOLL FACILITIES ...................... 1 REPORT PURPOSE AND STRUCTURE ............................................................. 1 SYSTEM HISTORY………………………………………………… ......................................... 2 Facility Milestones ......................................................................................... 2 FACILITY PROFILES .............................................................................................. 5 Midpoint Memorial Bridge ............................................................................. 5 General Usage Characteristics .............................................................. 5 Facility Capacity .................................................................................... 6 Peaking Characteristics ......................................................................... 6 Future Improvements and Plans ............................................................ 6 Cape Coral Bridge ......................................................................................... 7 General Usage Characteristics .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2020 Semiannual Report
    2301 Maitland Center Parkway, Suite 300 Maitland, FL 32751 tel: 407 660‐2552 fax: 407 875‐116 August 31, 2020 Ms. Susan Drotleff Toll Facilities Operations Manager Lee County Department of Transportation 1500 Monroe Street Fort Myers, FL 33901 Subject: Semiannual Traffic and Toll Revenue Report – Fiscal Year 2020 Lee County Toll Facilities Dear Ms. Drotleff: CDM Smith is pleased to submit this Semiannual Traffic and Toll Revenue Report, addressing facility performance for the first half of Fiscal Year (FY) 2019, beginning October 1, 2019 and ending March 31, 2020. As with previous semiannual reports, the performance data presented herein is compared to data from the same period in the previous fiscal year. This document will follow essentially the same format as the prior report. Any changes in methodology or data sources will be noted in the document. During March 2020, the last month in the first half of the fiscal year, the Lee County toll facilities began experiencing negative impacts due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Lee County suspended all cash toll collections starting March 18, 2020 on all three toll facilities, offering only transponder or Toll-by-Plate payments. COVID-19 will continue to negatively impact Lee County toll facilities during the second half of the fiscal year, which will be reported in the FY 2020 Annual Report. These negative impacts can be attributed to social distancing guidelines and stay-at-home orders throughout the State of Florida. This has resulted in the closings of schools, restaurants, malls, sporting events, beaches and other public venues. As a result, many people have been furloughed or lost their jobs.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Annual Traffic and Revenue Report for Lee County Toll Facilities
    $QQXDO©7UDIILF©DQG©5HYHQXH©5HSRUW )LVFDO©<HDU© /HH©&RXQW\©7ROO©)DFLOLWLHV 3UHSDUHG©IRU &DSH©&RUDO©%ULGJH 0LGSRLQW©0HPRULDO©%ULGJH 6DQLEHO©&DXVHZD\ $SULO© Lee County Toll Facilities FY 2018 Annual Traffic and Revenue Report TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO THE LEE COUNTY TOLL FACILITIES .................. 1 REPORT PURPOSE AND STRUCTURE ............................................................. 1 SYSTEM HISTORY ..................................................................................................... 2 Facility Milestones .............................................................................................. 4 TOLL RATE SCHEDULES ....................................................................................... 5 TOTAL SYSTEMWIDE TRANSACTIONS AND GROSS TOLL REVENUES ................................................................................................................... 8 Fiscal Year 2018 Toll Transactions and Revenues .......................................... 8 Historical Toll Transactions and Revenues .................................................... 10 ETC PARTICIPATION ............................................................................................. 13 TOLL TRANSACTIONS BY PAYMENT TYPE ................................................. 15 TOLL TRANSACTIONS BY VEHICLE CLASS ........................................ 18 COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE ............................................................ 19 Other Florida Toll Facilities .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lee County, Florida Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2019 Lee County, Florida
    Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Lee County, Florida Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2019 Lee County, Florida Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2019 ~ LEE COUNTY SOUTHWEST FLORIDA Prepared by: General Accounting Office, Finance & Records Department Clerk to Board of County Commissioners Linda Doggett Lee County, Florida PRINCIPAL OFFICIALS As of September 30, 2019 Elected Officials Board of County Commissioners, Port Commissioners: Commissioner, District 1 …………………………………… John Manning Commissioner, District 2 …………………………………… Cecil Pendergrass Commissioner, District 3 …………………………………… Ray Sandelli Commissioner, District 4 …………………………………… Brian Hamman * ** Commissioner, District 5 …………………………………… Frank Mann Appointed Officials County Manager ………………………………………………… Roger Desjarlais County Attorney ………………………………………………… Richard Wm. Wesch Executive Director, Port Authority ………………………………Jeff A. Mulder Hearing Examiner(s) ………………………………………………Donna Marie Collins Amanda L. Rivera * Chairman for Board of County Commissioners ** Chairman for Board of Port Commissioners Photographs provided by Ed Clement Photographic Services, Inc., Lee County Public Resources, Lee County Visitor & Convention Bureau, Lee County Port Authority, Lee County Water & Wastewater System, Lee County Solid Waste System, Lee County Transportation Facilities, and Lee County Transit. ii Lee County, Florida COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT September 30, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introductory Section PAGE Letter of Transmittal ……………………………………………………………………………………………
    [Show full text]
  • BOCC DOT Tolls
    COUNTY SO U THWEST F LOR I DA Internal Audit Report BOCC DOT Toll Facilities (LeeWay) Report Number: 2016.17 Date: April 17, 2017 Audit of BOCC DOT Toll Facilities Date: April 17, 2017 To: The Honorable Linda Doggett, Lee County Clerk of the Circuit Court & Comptroller From: Tim Parks, Chief Internal Audit Officer/Inspector General Re: Audit of BOCC DOT Tolls The Internal Audit/Inspector General Department has conducted an audit of the Lee County Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) Department of Transportation (DOT) Toll Facilities (aka: LeeWay). Dave Rollman, CIA, Senior Internal Auditor completed the review. This audit activity conforms to the Institute of Internal Auditor’s (IIA) International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing (Red Book) and the Association of Inspectors General (AIG) Principles and Standards for Offices of Inspector General. The audit client’s response is attached to this report. We wish to express our appreciation for the cooperation and assistance provided us by management and staff during this review. This report will be posted to the Clerk of Courts website, www.leeclerk.org, under Internal Audit/Inspector General, Audit Reports. A link to this report has been sent to the Lee County Board of County Commissioners and appropriate parties. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Tim Parks, Chief Internal Audit Officer/Inspector General Internal Audit/Inspector General Department TJP/GK Audit of BOCC DOT Toll Facilities Contents Executive Summary
    [Show full text]
  • City of Bonita Springs Flood Reduction and Watershed Restoration Plan
    DRAFT City of Bonita Springs Flood Reduction and Watershed Restoration Plan 1 Source: SWFRPC 2017 James W. Beever III, Tim Walker, and Aidan Bandy Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council 1400 Colonial Boulevard, Suite 1 Fort Myers, FL 33907 Contact Name and Telephone Number: Jim Beever (239- 938-1813, ext. 224) [email protected] DRAFT 20180413 J. Beever DRAFT Table of Contents Table of Contents ....................................................................................................... 2 Disclaimer .................................................................................................................. 8 Acknowledgements .................................................................................................. 10 Abstract .................................................................................................................... 11 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 14 The Estero Bay Watershed Landscape .................................................................... 14 The Fifteen City Watersheds (AKA Sub-basins) .................................................... 20 Figure 1: The Fifteen Sub-basins (15) in the City of Bonita Springs ............................... 21 Figure 2: The Fifteen Sub-basins (15) Watersheds in the City of Bonita Springs (color coded) ................................................................................................................................ 22 Table 1: The Area and Percentage
    [Show full text]
  • National Inventory of Specialty Lanes and Highways: Technical Report February 2021 6
    Publication No. FHWA-HOP-20-043 February 2021 Notice This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the use of the information contained in this document. The U.S. Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trademarks or manufacturers’ names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the objective of the document. Quality Assurance Statement The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) provides high- quality information to serve Government, industry, and the public in a manner that promotes public understanding. Standards and policies are used to ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of its information. The FHWA periodically reviews quality issues and adjusts its programs and processes to ensure continuous quality improvement. Non-Binding Contents The contents of this document do not have the force and effect of law and are not meant to bind the public in any way. This document is intended only to provide clarity to the public regarding existing requirements under the law or agency policies. Cover Image Source: Texas A&M Transportation Institute TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA-HOP-20-043 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date National Inventory of Specialty Lanes and Highways: Technical Report February 2021 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Authors 8. Performing Organization Nick Wood, Vivek Gupta, James P. Cardenas, Jinuk Hwang, Deepak Report No. Raghunathan 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10.
    [Show full text]
  • 446 Part 117—Drawbridge Operation Regulations
    § 116.55 33 CFR Ch. I (7–1–02 Edition) c. Betterments llll $llll other than an order of apportionment, Expected savings in repair or maintenance nor relieve any bridge owner of any li- costs: ability or penalty under other provi- a. Repair $ llll llll sions of that act. b. Maintenance llll $llll Costs attributable to requirements of rail- [CGD 91–063, 60 FR 20902, Apr. 28, 1995, as road and/or highway traffic llll amended by CGD 96–026, 61 FR 33663, June 28, $llll 1996; CGD 97–023, 62 FR 33363, June 19, 1997] Expenditure for increased carrying capacity llll $llll Expired service life of old bridge llll PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE $llll OPERATION REGULATIONS Subtotal llll $llll Share to be borne by the bridge owner Subpart A—General Requirements llll $llll Contingencies llll $llll Sec. Total llll $llll 117.1 Purpose. Share to be borne by the United States 117.3 Applicability. llll $llll 117.4 Definitions. Contingencies llll $llll 117.5 When the draw shall open. Total llll $llll 117.7 General duties of drawbridge owners and tenders. (d) The Order of Apportionment of 117.9 Delaying opening of a draw. Costs will include the guaranty of 117.11 Unnecessary opening of the draw. costs. 117.15 Signals. 117.17 Signalling for contiguous draw- § 116.55 Appeals. bridges. (a) Except for the decision to issue an 117.19 Signalling when two or more vessels are approaching a drawbridge. Order to Alter, if a complainant dis- 117.21 Signalling for an opened drawbridge. agrees with a recommendation regard- 117.23 Installation of radiotelephones.
    [Show full text]
  • Sanibel Causeway Toll Increase Needed to Pay for Replacement Bridges Marine Lab Keeps an Eye on Water Quality Council Votes
    VOL 12, NO. 3 SANIBEL & CAPTIVA ISLANDS, FLORIDA JULY 23,2004 JULY SUNRISE/SUNSET: # 06:50 20:19 # 06:50 20:19 # 06:51 20:18 # 06:51 20:18 # 06:52 20:17 # 06:52 20:16 ft 06:53 20:16 Sanibel Causeway Toll Marine Lab Keeps An Increase Needed To Pay Eye On Water Quality For Replacement Bridges submitted by Lee County Department of Transportation ee County transportation and administration officials are proposing a toll increase for the Sanibel Causeway to pay for the replacement of its three Lbridges, a move necessitated in part by recent lawsuits and increased construc- tion costs. The proposal calls for the current $3 toll to increase to $6. The discounted prepaid toll would increase from 50 cents to $3. The eight other discount programs for the bridge also would increase. A complete list of the discount programs follows and is available on the Internet at leecounty.com/publicwords/sanibelcauseway. Depending on how frequent a user you are and which discount program you select, your per trip cost could be as little as $1.71. Go to the same Web site to see a chart of discounppro- grams and per trip costs. The Board of Lee County Commissioners will begin considering the proposal at its July 27 meeting (9:30 a.m.). County staff will recommend setting a 5 p.m. public hear- ing on August 10 to discuss, the proposed tolls. Both meetings will be in the County Commission chambers, Old County Courthouse, 2120 Main Street, in downtown Fort Myers. Timing is critical for a decision on the increased toll proposal: LeeWay's discount tolls programs renew each November.
    [Show full text]