DOCSLIB.ORG

Electricity Generation Baseline Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Electricity Generation Baseline Report Jeffrey Logan, Cara Marcy, James McCall, Francisco Flores-Espino, Aaron Bloom, Jørn Aabakken, Wesley Cole, Thomas Jenkin, Gian Porro, and Chang Liu National Renewable Energy Laboratory Francesco Ganda Argonne National Laboratory Richard Boardman Idaho National Laboratory Thomas Tarka, John Brewer, and Travis Schultz National Energy Technology Laboratory NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. Technical Report NREL/TP-6A20-67645 January 2017 Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Electricity Generation Baseline Report Jeffrey Logan, Cara Marcy, James McCall, Francisco Flores-Espino, Aaron Bloom, Jørn Aabakken, Wesley Cole, Thomas Jenkin, Gian Porro, and Chang Liu National Renewable Energy Laboratory Francesco Ganda Argonne National Laboratory Richard Boardman Idaho National Laboratory Thomas Tarka, John Brewer, and Travis Schultz National Energy Technology Laboratory Prepared under Task No. EP42.0401 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report 15013 Denver West Parkway NREL/TP-6A20-67645 Golden, CO 80401 January 2017 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof. This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. Available electronically at SciTech Connect http:/www.osti.gov/scitech Available for a processing fee to U.S. Department of Energy and its contractors, in paper, from: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-0062 OSTI http://www.osti.gov Phone: 865.576.8401 Fax: 865.576.5728 Email: [email protected] Available for sale to the public, in paper, from: U.S. Department of Commerce National Technical Information Service 5301 Shawnee Road Alexandria, VA 22312 NTIS http://www.ntis.gov Phone: 800.553.6847 or 703.605.6000 Fax: 703.605.6900 Email: [email protected] Cover Photos by Dennis Schroeder: (left to right) NREL 26173, NREL 18302, NREL 19758, NREL 29642, NREL 19795. NREL prints on paper that contains recycled content. Acknowledgments The authors wish to thank the Baseline Generation Team at the Office of Energy Policy and System Analysis (EPSA) in the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) for the sponsorship and guidance on this work. Rob Anderson, Carol Battershell, Aaron Bergman, Erin Boyd, Alex Breckel, Hugh Chen, Christina Cody, Carla Frisch, Liz Hartman, Eric Hsieh, Emily Lewis, Larry Mansueti, Josh Olazabal, Jeanette Pablo (team lead), Lara Pierpoint, John Richards, and Robert Schmitt provided helpful feedback and advice during the process of producing this report. We also thank Michelle Dallafior (Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability), Paul Donohoo-Vallet (Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy), Sarah Forbes (Office of Fossil Energy), Michael Goff (Office of Nuclear Energy), Lindsey Griffith (EPSA), Elke Hodson (EPSA), Jordan Kislear (Office of Fossil Energy), Steve Lindenberg (Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy), Timothy Reinhardt (Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy), Margaret Schaus (Office of Fossil Energy), and Bradley Williams (Office of Nuclear Energy) for interim feedback and review. We also appreciate the critical reviews by the following individuals and organizations, which improved and informed the analysis contained herein: Michelle Melton (Center for Strategic and International Studies), Karl Hausker (World Resources Institute), Manuel Baritaud (International Energy Agency), Doug Smith and Sue Sheridan (Van Ness Feldman), and many individuals from the Electric Power Research Institute. Any remaining errors, omissions, or mischaracterizations are the responsibility of the authors. iii This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. Scope and Organization This report was developed by a team of national laboratory analysts over the period October 2015 to May 2016 and is part of a series of studies that provide background material to inform development of the second installment of the Quadrennial Energy Review (QER 1.2). The report focuses specifically on U.S. power sector generation. The report limits itself to the generation sector and does not address in detail parallel issues in electricity end use, transmission and distribution, markets and policy design, and other important segments. Chapter 1 provides a brief introduction to the report. Chapter 2 of the report focuses on the main drivers of change, as well as future uncertainties, in the U.S. generation sector. These include the impact of low natural gas prices; the rise of renewable and distributed generation; recent Federal and State policies impacting generation; the decoupling of gross domestic product (GDP), electricity demand, and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions; and the electrification of the transportation sector. Chapter 3 discusses crosscutting metrics and trends in the U.S. generation sector. These attributes include generation roles, capacity factors and heat rates, costs, sustainability characteristics, ownership types, and Federal policy. Chapter 4 describes recent trends in power generation, focusing on the national and regional levels at the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) boundaries. Chapters 5 through 13 focus on individual generation technologies and provide information on technology cost and performance trends, fuel supply, environmental impacts, constraints, existing deployment metrics, and policy and regulatory drivers that have impacted deployment and could affect future development. Appendix A contains additional information about each generation technology. Appendix B contains details on the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) methodology used in chapter 3 and throughout. iv This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. Abbreviations AC alternating current AEO2015 Annual Energy Outlook 2015 AMD acid mine drainage Btu British thermal unit BWR boiling water reactors CC combined cycle CCS carbon capture and storage CO2 carbon dioxide CPP Clean Power Plan CSP concentrating solar power CT combustion turbine CWIP construction work in progress DC direct current DOE U.S. Department of Energy EGS enhanced geothermal systems EIA U.S. Energy Information Administration (DOE) EOR enhanced oil recovery EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency EPRI Electric Power Research Institute EPSA Office of Energy Policy and Systems Analysis (DOE) ERCOT Electric Reliability Council of Texas EV electric vehicle FERC U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission FORGE Frontier Observatory for Research in Geothermal Energy FRCC Florida Reliability Coordinating Council GDP gross domestic product GHG greenhouse gas GW gigawatt GWd/MTU gigawatt-days per metric ton uranium GWe gigawatt electrical GWh gigawatt-hour HOGR High Oil and Gas Resource IEA International Energy Agency IGCC integrated gasification combined cycle IGCC-CCS integrated gasification combined cycle‒carbon capture and storage IOU investor-owned utility ITC investment tax credit kW kilowatt kWh kilowatt-hour LACE levelized avoided cost of electricity LBNL Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory LCOE levelized cost of electricity v This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. LFG landfill gas LWR light water reactor MHK marine and hydrokinetic MISO Mid-Continent Independent System Operator MMBtu million British thermal unit MRO Midwest Reliability Organization MSW municipal solid waste MW megawatt MWe megawatt electrical MWh megawatt-hour NERC North American Electric Reliability Corporation NGCC natural gas combined cycle NGCT natural gas combustion turbine NMVOC non-methane volatile organic compound NOx nitrogen oxides NREL National Renewable Energy Laboratory NPCC Northeast Power Coordinating Council NYISO New York Independent System Operator O&M operation and maintenance ORNL Oak Ridge National Laboratory PC pulverized coal PEV plug-in electric vehicle PJM Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Maryland Interconnection PMA Power Marketing Administration PPA
Recommended publications
  • Investigating Hidden Flexibilities Provided by Power-To-X Consid- Ering Grid Support Strategies

    Investigating Hidden Flexibilities Provided by Power-To-X Consid- Ering Grid Support Strategies

    InVESTIGATING Hidden FleXIBILITIES ProVIDED BY Power-to-X Consid- ERING Grid Support StrATEGIES Master Thesis B. Caner YAgcı˘ Intelligent Electrical POWER Grids Investigating Hidden Flexibilities Provided by Power-to-X Considering Grid Support Strategies Master Thesis by B. Caner Yağcı to obtain the degree of Master of Science at the Delft University of Technology, to be defended publicly on Tuesday September 14, 2020 at 9:30. Student number: 4857089 Project duration: December 2, 2019 – September 14, 2020 Thesis committee: Dr. Milos Cvetkovic, TU Delft, supervisor Dr. ir. J. L. Rueda Torres, TU Delft Dr. L. M. Ramirez Elizando TU Delft This thesis is confidential and cannot be made public until September 14, 2020. An electronic version of this thesis is available at http://repository.tudelft.nl/. Preface First of all, I would like to thank PhD. Digvijay Gusain and Dr. Milos Cvetkovic for not only teaching me the answers through this journey, but also giving me the perception of asking the right questions that lead simple ideas into unique values. I would also like to thank my family Alican, Huriye, U˘gur, Gökhan who have been supporting me from the beginning of this journey and more. You continue inspiring me to find my own path and soul, even from miles away. Your blessing is my treasure in life... My friends, Onurhan and Berke. You encourage me and give me confidence to be my best in any scene. You are two extraordinary men who, I know, will always be there when I need. Finally, I would like to thank TU Delft staff and my colleagues in TU Delft for making this journey enter- taining and illuminative for me.
  • Net Zero by 2050 a Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector Net Zero by 2050

    Net Zero by 2050 a Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector Net Zero by 2050

    Net Zero by 2050 A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector Net Zero by 2050 A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector Net Zero by 2050 Interactive iea.li/nzeroadmap Net Zero by 2050 Data iea.li/nzedata INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY The IEA examines the IEA member IEA association full spectrum countries: countries: of energy issues including oil, gas and Australia Brazil coal supply and Austria China demand, renewable Belgium India energy technologies, Canada Indonesia electricity markets, Czech Republic Morocco energy efficiency, Denmark Singapore access to energy, Estonia South Africa demand side Finland Thailand management and France much more. Through Germany its work, the IEA Greece advocates policies Hungary that will enhance the Ireland reliability, affordability Italy and sustainability of Japan energy in its Korea 30 member Luxembourg countries, Mexico 8 association Netherlands countries and New Zealand beyond. Norway Poland Portugal Slovak Republic Spain Sweden Please note that this publication is subject to Switzerland specific restrictions that limit Turkey its use and distribution. The United Kingdom terms and conditions are available online at United States www.iea.org/t&c/ This publication and any The European map included herein are without prejudice to the Commission also status of or sovereignty over participates in the any territory, to the work of the IEA delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Source: IEA. All rights reserved. International Energy Agency Website: www.iea.org Foreword We are approaching a decisive moment for international efforts to tackle the climate crisis – a great challenge of our times.
  • U.S. Energy in the 21St Century: a Primer

    U.S. Energy in the 21St Century: a Primer

    U.S. Energy in the 21st Century: A Primer March 16, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46723 SUMMARY R46723 U.S. Energy in the 21st Century: A Primer March 16, 2021 Since the start of the 21st century, the U.S. energy system has changed tremendously. Technological advances in energy production have driven changes in energy consumption, and Melissa N. Diaz, the United States has moved from being a net importer of most forms of energy to a declining Coordinator importer—and a net exporter in 2019. The United States remains the second largest producer and Analyst in Energy Policy consumer of energy in the world, behind China. Overall energy consumption in the United States has held relatively steady since 2000, while the mix of energy sources has changed. Between 2000 and 2019, consumption of natural gas and renewable energy increased, while oil and nuclear power were relatively flat and coal decreased. In the same period, production of oil, natural gas, and renewables increased, while nuclear power was relatively flat and coal decreased. Overall energy production increased by 42% over the same period. Increases in the production of oil and natural gas are due in part to technological improvements in hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling that have facilitated access to resources in unconventional formations (e.g., shale). U.S. oil production (including natural gas liquids and crude oil) and natural gas production hit record highs in 2019. The United States is the largest producer of natural gas, a net exporter, and the largest consumer. Oil, natural gas, and other liquid fuels depend on a network of over three million miles of pipeline infrastructure.
  • Science Based Coal Phase-Out Timeline for Japan Implications for Policymakers and Investors May 2018

    Science Based Coal Phase-Out Timeline for Japan Implications for Policymakers and Investors May 2018

    a SCIENCE BASED COAL PHASE-OUT TIMELINE FOR JAPAN IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICYMAKERS AND INVESTORS MAY 2018 In collaboration with AUTHORS Paola Yanguas Parra Climate Analytics Yuri Okubo Renewable Energy Institute Niklas Roming Climate Analytics Fabio Sferra Climate Analytics Dr. Ursula Fuentes Climate Analytics Dr. Michiel Schaeffer Climate Analytics Dr. Bill Hare Climate Analytics GRAPHIC DESIGN Matt Beer Climate Analytics This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit services without special permission from Climate Analytics, provided acknowledgement and/or proper referencing of the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from Climate Analytics. We regret any errors or omissions that may have been unwittingly made. This document may be cited as: Climate Analytics, Renewable Energy Institute (2018). Science Based Coal Phase-out Timeline for Japan: Implications for policymakers and investors A digital copy of this report along with supporting appendices is available at: www.climateanalytics.org/publications www.renewable-ei.org/activities/reports/20180529.html Cover photo: © xpixel In collaboration with SCIENCE BASED COAL PHASE-OUT TIMELINE FOR JAPAN IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICYMAKERS AND INVESTORS Photo © ImagineStock TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive summary 1 Introduction 5 1 Coal emissions in line with the Paris Agreement 7 2 Coal emissions in Japan 9 2.1 Emissions from current and planned
  • Nuclear Power - Conventional

    Nuclear Power - Conventional

    NUCLEAR POWER - CONVENTIONAL DESCRIPTION Nuclear fission—the process in which a nucleus absorbs a neutron and splits into two lighter nuclei—releases tremendous amounts of energy. In a nuclear power plant, this fission process is controlled in a reactor to generate heat. The heat from the reactor creates steam, which runs through turbines to power electrical generators. The most common nuclear power plant design uses a Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR). Water is used as both neutron moderator and reactor coolant. That water is kept separate from the water used to generate steam and drive the turbine. In essence there are three water systems: one for converting the nuclear heat to steam and cooling the reactor; one for the steam system to spin the turbine; and one to convert the turbine steam back into water. The other common nuclear power plant design uses a Boiling Water Reactor (BWR). The BWR uses water as moderator and coolant, like the PWR, but has no separate secondary steam cycle. So the water from the reactor is converted into steam and used to directly drive the generator turbine. COST Conventional nuclear power plants are quite expensive to construct but have fairly low operating costs. Of the four new plants currently under construction, construction costs reportedly range from $4.7 million to $6.3 million per MW. Production costs for Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station are reported to be less than $15/MWh. CAPACITY FACTOR Typical capacity factor for a nuclear power plant is over 90%. TIME TO PERMIT AND CONSTRUCT Design, permitting and construction of a new conventional nuclear power plant will likely require a minimum of 10 years and perhaps significantly longer.
  • Trends in Electricity Prices During the Transition Away from Coal by William B

    Trends in Electricity Prices During the Transition Away from Coal by William B

    May 2021 | Vol. 10 / No. 10 PRICES AND SPENDING Trends in electricity prices during the transition away from coal By William B. McClain The electric power sector of the United States has undergone several major shifts since the deregulation of wholesale electricity markets began in the 1990s. One interesting shift is the transition away from coal-powered plants toward a greater mix of natural gas and renewable sources. This transition has been spurred by three major factors: rising costs of prepared coal for use in power generation, a significant expansion of economical domestic natural gas production coupled with a corresponding decline in prices, and rapid advances in technology for renewable power generation.1 The transition from coal, which included the early retirement of coal plants, has affected major price-determining factors within the electric power sector such as operation and maintenance costs, 1 U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS capital investment, and fuel costs. Through these effects, the decline of coal as the primary fuel source in American electricity production has affected both wholesale and retail electricity prices. Identifying specific price effects from the transition away from coal is challenging; however the producer price indexes (PPIs) for electric power can be used to compare general trends in price development across generator types and regions, and can be used to learn valuable insights into the early effects of fuel switching in the electric power sector from coal to natural gas and renewable sources. The PPI program measures the average change in prices for industries based on the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS).
  • ELECTRIC POWER | April 14-17 2020 | Denver, CO | Electricpowerexpo.Com

    ELECTRIC POWER | April 14-17 2020 | Denver, CO | Electricpowerexpo.Com

    Presented by: EXPERIENCE POWER ELECTRIC POWER | April 14-17 2020 | Denver, CO | electricpowerexpo.com 36006 MAKE CHANGE HAPPEN ON THE alteRED POWER LANDSCAPE! The global power sector is undergoing dramatic changes, driven by many economic, technological and efficiency factors. Rapid reductions in the cost of solar and wind technologies have led to their widespread adoption. To accommodate soaring shares of these variable forms of generation, innovations have also emerged to increase supply-side, demand-side, grid, and storage flexibility. ELECTRIC POWER is the ONLY event providing real-world, actionable content year-round in print, online, and in person that can be applied immediately at your facility, and it’s your best opportunity to discover, learn and make change happen within your organization. OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE | BUSINESS MANAGEMENT | ENABLING TECHNOLOGIES | SYSTEM DESIGN It’s the conference I make it a point to attend every year. All of the programs really provide an opportunity for the “ attendees to go back to their plant the very next week and look at something a different way or try“ out a new process or procedure. It’s been a great opportunity to make contacts and meet new vendors and suppliers of goods and services and has opened up the opportunity for everyone to exchange information and facts. Melanie Green, Sr. Director — Power Generation, CPS Energy CO-locATED EVENTS ENERGY PROVIDERS COALITION FOR EDUCATION ELECTRIC POWER | April 14-17 2020 | Denver, CO | electricpowerexpo.com WHY EXHIBIT & SPONSOR? • BRANDING • BUILD RELATIONSHIPS/NETWORKING • THOUGHT LEADERSHIP • DRIVE SALES 2200 700 38 100+ 85% Attendees Conference Delegates Countries End-User Companies of attendees are from the top 20 U.S.
  • Printer Tech Tips—Cause & Effects of Static Electricity in Paper

    Printer Tech Tips—Cause & Effects of Static Electricity in Paper

    Printer Tech Tips Cause & Effects of Static Electricity in Paper Problem The paper has developed a static electrical charge causing an abnormal sheet-to- sheet or sheet-to-material attraction which is difficult to separate. This condition may result in feeder trip-offs, print voids from surface contamination, ink offset, Sappi Printer Technical Service or poor sheet jog in the delivery. 877 SappiHelp (727 7443) Description Static electricity is defined as a non-moving, non-flowing electrical charge or in simple terms, electricity at rest. Static electricity becomes visible and dynamic during the brief moment it sparks a discharge and for that instant it’s no longer at rest. Lightning is the result of static discharge as is the shock you receive just before contacting a grounded object during unusually dry weather. Matter is composed of atoms, which in turn are composed of protons, neutrons, and electrons. The number of protons and neutrons, which make up the atoms nucleus, determine the type of material. Electrons orbit the nucleus and balance the electrical charge of the protons. When both negative and positive are equal, the charge of the balanced atom is neutral. If electrons are removed or added to this configuration, the overall charge becomes either negative or positive resulting in an unbalanced atom. Materials with high conductivity, such as steel, are called conductors and maintain neutrality because their electrons can move freely from atom to atom to balance any applied charges. Therefore, conductors can dissipate static when properly grounded. Non-conductive materials, or insulators such as plastic and wood, have the opposite property as their electrons can not move freely to maintain balance.
  • Lessons Learned from Existing Biomass Power Plants February 2000 • NREL/SR-570-26946

    Lessons Learned from Existing Biomass Power Plants February 2000 • NREL/SR-570-26946

    Lessons Learned from Existing Biomass Power Plants February 2000 • NREL/SR-570-26946 Lessons Learned from Existing Biomass Power Plants G. Wiltsee Appel Consultants, Inc. Valencia, California NREL Technical Monitor: Richard Bain Prepared under Subcontract No. AXE-8-18008 National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 NREL is a U.S. Department of Energy Laboratory Operated by Midwest Research Institute • Battelle • Bechtel Contract No. DE-AC36-99-GO10337 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof. Available electronically at http://www.doe.gov/bridge Available for a processing fee to U.S. Department of Energy and its contractors, in paper, from: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-0062 phone: 865.576.8401 fax: 865.576.5728 email: [email protected] Available for sale to the public, in paper, from: U.S.
  • Overview of Electric Power Supply Systems

    Overview of Electric Power Supply Systems

    Overview of Electric Power Supply Systems Why are electric power systems studied? What are the characteristics of power systems that justify spending a whole course on them? There are many answers to each of these questions; this course will touch on a few of them. You will recall that ECE370 gave an overview of the circuit theory associated with electrical power and it is worth recalling that most power systems are three-phase and that when balanced systems are being analyzed these are usually drawn in terms of a one-line diagram, i.e. a single line is used to denote the three phases, which may or may not also have a neutral. The US Electric Power System The main aspects that describe power systems are: size, complexity and economic impact. Utility power systems cover vast territory, are subject to the whims of nature, are interconnected to each other, the quality of their commodity affects the ability of industry to produce effectively, and the price of their commodity has a significant impact on the economy of their service area. Controlling power systems requires that electricity be supplied at the correct frequency, satisfactory voltage, with its phases balanced, have low harmonic content, and with all protection systems coordinated. The foregoing has to be achieved without overloading equipment and at the lowest cost to the consumer (after the utility makes a reasonable profit.) All this is complicated by the fact that demand for electricity changes throughout the day (and week, and season) and that electricity can not be readily stored in a practical manner.
  • A Review of Energy Storage Technologies' Application

    A Review of Energy Storage Technologies' Application

    sustainability Review A Review of Energy Storage Technologies’ Application Potentials in Renewable Energy Sources Grid Integration Henok Ayele Behabtu 1,2,* , Maarten Messagie 1, Thierry Coosemans 1, Maitane Berecibar 1, Kinde Anlay Fante 2 , Abraham Alem Kebede 1,2 and Joeri Van Mierlo 1 1 Mobility, Logistics, and Automotive Technology Research Centre, Vrije Universiteit Brussels, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium; [email protected] (M.M.); [email protected] (T.C.); [email protected] (M.B.); [email protected] (A.A.K.); [email protected] (J.V.M.) 2 Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Jimma Institute of Technology, Jimma University, Jimma P.O. Box 378, Ethiopia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +32-485659951 or +251-926434658 Received: 12 November 2020; Accepted: 11 December 2020; Published: 15 December 2020 Abstract: Renewable energy sources (RESs) such as wind and solar are frequently hit by fluctuations due to, for example, insufficient wind or sunshine. Energy storage technologies (ESTs) mitigate the problem by storing excess energy generated and then making it accessible on demand. While there are various EST studies, the literature remains isolated and dated. The comparison of the characteristics of ESTs and their potential applications is also short. This paper fills this gap. Using selected criteria, it identifies key ESTs and provides an updated review of the literature on ESTs and their application potential to the renewable energy sector. The critical review shows a high potential application for Li-ion batteries and most fit to mitigate the fluctuation of RESs in utility grid integration sector.
  • Advantages of Applying Large-Scale Energy Storage for Load-Generation Balancing

    Advantages of Applying Large-Scale Energy Storage for Load-Generation Balancing

    energies Article Advantages of Applying Large-Scale Energy Storage for Load-Generation Balancing Dawid Chudy * and Adam Le´sniak Institute of Electrical Power Engineering, Lodz University of Technology, Stefanowskiego Str. 18/22, PL 90-924 Lodz, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The continuous development of energy storage (ES) technologies and their wider utiliza- tion in modern power systems are becoming more and more visible. ES is used for a variety of applications ranging from price arbitrage, voltage and frequency regulation, reserves provision, black-starting and renewable energy sources (RESs), supporting load-generation balancing. The cost of ES technologies remains high; nevertheless, future decreases are expected. As the most profitable and technically effective solutions are continuously sought, this article presents the results of the analyses which through the created unit commitment and dispatch optimization model examines the use of ES as support for load-generation balancing. The performed simulations based on various scenarios show a possibility to reduce the number of starting-up centrally dispatched generating units (CDGUs) required to satisfy the electricity demand, which results in the facilitation of load-generation balancing for transmission system operators (TSOs). The barriers that should be encountered to improving the proposed use of ES were also identified. The presented solution may be suitable for further development of renewables and, in light of strict climate and energy policies, may lead to lower utilization of large-scale power generating units required to maintain proper operation of power systems. Citation: Chudy, D.; Le´sniak,A. Keywords: load-generation balancing; large-scale energy storage; power system services modeling; Advantages of Applying Large-Scale power system operation; power system optimization Energy Storage for Load-Generation Balancing.