Presidential Profile

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Presidential Profile No.1 Jan./Feb. 1986 the LEPIDOPTERISTS' SOCIETY or EDITOR June Preston 832 Sunset Dr. Lawrence. KS 66044 U.S.A. ASSOCIATE EDITORS Zone Coordinator. Art DIrector 1. Ken Philip 6. Ed Knudson 11. J.e.E. Riotte Les Sielski 2. Jon Shepard 12. Eduardo Welling M. Ripples 7. Ross Layberry Jo Brewer 3. Bob Langston 8. Mo Nielsen 13. Boyce Drummond 4. Ray Stanford 9. Andy Beck 5. Dick Rosche 10. Dave Winter _._ _ ., _ _.., _ ., _ .. Presidential Profile Clifford D. Ferris, of the University of Wyomi ng, is newly-emergi ng di scipline of Bioengineeri ng. After currently serving as President of the Lepidopterists' holding appointments at Drexel University and the Society. He was born in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania where University of Maryland, he moved to the University of he began collecting insects at the age of nine. His Wyoming in 1968, where he is Director of the early interest in entomology was encouraged by various Bioengineering Program and Professor of Electrical staff members at the Academy of Natural Sciences in Engineering. During 1973-74 he served as Acting Dean of Philadelphia including E. T. Cresson and J. W. H. Rehn, the College of Engineering. In addition to teaching, his and while in high school through correspondence with university activities include design of specialized medical William Beebe at the American Museum of Natural electronic instrumentation for diagnostic and therapeutic History, and Harry Clench at Carnegie Museum who app lications. subsequently became a good friend. Cliff received the Summers and holidays are occupied with B.S. and M.S. degrees in Electrical Engineering in 1957 lepidopterological pursuits. Although Cliff maintains a and 1958, respectively, from the University of general reference collection of North American Pennsylvania. He earned his D.Sc. in 1962 from the Lepidoptera and some exotic material, his major interests George Washi ngton Universi ty and entered an academic lie with the arctic and arctic-alpine fauna. He has career in the field of Electrical Engineering and the traveled over the arctic regions from northern Labrador to Alaska seeking elusive species. He has also hiked and backpacked into many remote areas of the Rocky Mountains looking for relict species. Dr. Ferris is author or co-author of more than 200 scientific papers and monographs, and five books, including Butterflies of the Rocky Mountain States, co-edited with F. Martin Brown. His first entomological publication was in Entomological News in 1951 - on a dragonfly! Cliff's service to the Lepidopterists' Society includes: Member-at-Large of the Executive Council, 1978-81; Vice President, 1982; Common Names Committee, 1980 to present; Chairman, Committee on Nomenclature (including revision of Memoir #2), 1982 to present; host for 1982 Annual Meeting in Laramie. Dr. Ferris is a member of the Board of Directors of the Xerces Society and also serves as a Chief Counsellor of that organization. Cliff is a past president and a member of the Board of Directors of the Rocky Mountain Bioengineering Symposium, Inc. He is a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science and holds memberships in the New York Academy of Sciences, the Maryland Entomological Society, the Pacific Coast Entomological Society, and various engineering societies. Cliff is also a Research Associate of the Allyn Museum of Entomology/Florida State Museum, of the Department of Entomology of the Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History, and of the Florida State Collection of Arthropods. - 7. GENDER BAIlQ.: I have appraised collections where the females are almost non-existent and this is a minus factor. The optimum ratio would be 1 male to 1 female but few collections approach th is level. An acceptable proportion would be 3 or 4 males to one female. 8. DIFFERENT SPECIES HJJM!1ER: A 5000 specimen collection of one half Cabbage butterflies and one half APPRA ISALS OF LEPIDOPTERA COLLECTlOR;, Part II Painted ladies in outstanding condition could be valuable under the first 7 factors but would stub its toe on this In the JUly/Aug 1985 (it4) issue of NEWS, requirement. What is a 5000 specimen, common 2 species mentioned that 18 factors of appraisal are involved in collection worth? Not too much! On the other hand if financially evaluating a collection. Let's examine each 2500 were QrnWBW-Ull fllexl!~ and the other half briefly - some of you may have overlooked factors that ~ homerus, break out the computer and don't tell you could upgrade. anyone where you keep them! If you have 1050 (plus MECHANICS 2f APPRAISAL: I place a base value on subspecies) of the 1100 species of North America a specimen depending on the first and second factors butterflies, your almos t comp lete collection wou Id be below and then add positive or subtract negative amounts highly prized, praised and appraised. as I proceed with the evaluation. 9. MUSEUM YAlJill.: A museum most covets the I. LOCATION: The ORIGIN of the species is species it doesn't have, so determine the needs of the fittingly the initial factor. The starting point is $1.50 museum you will be donati ng your collection to, and for a standard pinned, spread North American specimen catch those to increase the "museum" factor. But of and $1.85 for a foreign one. course we don't always know this ahead of time. The 2. flllN-llKi: A specimen is pinned, papered or museum factor is usually invoked when the collector has layered. Some small moths are pinned unspread when ample numbers of rare or extremely rare series of caught (trapp ed) to avoid rehandli ng. Riker mounti ng is individual species that provides the museum researcher spread, unpinned but the usual collection consists of with a sufficient sample spread for comparison. A one spread, pinned specimens and specimens individually specimen sample doesn't usually lead to valid papered or layered (as in sandwich boxes). An unpinned conclusions. The collector must constantly remember the unspread specimen receives a substantial markdown from butterfly (moth) is often var iable and that he shou ld the pinned one. Boxing occurs When extensive collecting provide the researcher - or (even more importantly) the is done and a single label is placed on the box with the describer, with a series of specimens of sufficient quality complete appropriate data. This technique is less so that he is not required to describe from a single valuable than individual papering. We always spread the specimen that may not be typical at all but possibly at best specimens! the extreme edge of that species' variability. The 3. QUALITY: I use 5 levels of quality - MIA, mint museum (or study) factor is not involked in a collection expupa; lA, top netted; lA-, standard netted; 2A, of single pairs of many different species, although the chipped, damaged, smudged; 3A, elderly, 50% off; a collection may be more valuable commercially or in its commercial MIA is usually not only a butterfly but also rarity. The comparison factor must be possible for the a work of art. Very valuable! added museum credit, unless the (small) museum doesn't 4. PREPARATION: Poor preparation can devalue an have any of the specimens at all! outstanding collection, needlessly! Proper preparation is 10. RARITY: Most of us know that if we are there your contribution to the value of your collection. The when the butterfly is there in large numbers, it is not dried butterfly is fragile and never forget it. rare. Two or three weeks later, however, they may Preparation starts from netti ng, through squeezi ng, appear to be extinct by their total absence. If the papering, killing, storing, relaxing, spreading, removing butterfly (moth) is confined to one small locality on the from boards, displaying and protecting from pests. If entire earth, single brooded, in small numbers - that's you make any mistakes - from the time you place the pin very rare and HIGH in value - f.lw.il.i.Q homerus in incorrectly to finally leaving the spread species in a Jamaica, Lycaena heteronea clara in West Los Angeles, "pesty" box in a damp place - you can only hurt (or etc. Rare and very rare represent the two degrees of destroy) your collection. Outstanding specimens rarity. See 11 next. outstandingly prepared multiply the value. 11. OCIENTlFIC: Types, topo, para, gynandromorphs, 5. DAIA: Specific (subspecies) naming and location. historical specimens, uniques, aberrants, extinct, Information (on the pin as opposed to a key it in a protected, intergenera matings, endangered (not too journal) should permanently accompany each specimen. I many!) species - represent valuable additions. realize most museums have specimens in named unit trays 12. QQMMERCIAL: Specimens are collected in four but it is fairly simple for the original collector to add ways - wrought, sought, caught or bought! I f you have an additional label on the pin when he (she) has the time and you can raise the specimen, What God hath determined the species and subspecies. I write the name "wrought" gives you the mint lA specimens; you can trade on the underside of the original label or a cue name if with other collectors for what you seek; you can catch the label is too small for the full nami ng. Anyway, a them yourself; or, if you can justify the cost to your specimen with no data is merely a beautiful example of wife, you can buy entire collections or at least your nature. A lack of data is a heavy NEGATIVE value. preferred family or genera! Commercial catalogues from Noting the continent is of some academic value but not lep dealers all over the world are available for the as valuable as "100 yds north of the bridge on Hwy 5 - 2 asking (or a small fee) and a valid value of a popular mi west of Bridgeport, Calif.
Recommended publications
  • Phylogenetic Relationships and Historical Biogeography of Tribes and Genera in the Subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)
    Blackwell Science, LtdOxford, UKBIJBiological Journal of the Linnean Society 0024-4066The Linnean Society of London, 2005? 2005 862 227251 Original Article PHYLOGENY OF NYMPHALINAE N. WAHLBERG ET AL Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2005, 86, 227–251. With 5 figures . Phylogenetic relationships and historical biogeography of tribes and genera in the subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) NIKLAS WAHLBERG1*, ANDREW V. Z. BROWER2 and SÖREN NYLIN1 1Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden 2Department of Zoology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331–2907, USA Received 10 January 2004; accepted for publication 12 November 2004 We infer for the first time the phylogenetic relationships of genera and tribes in the ecologically and evolutionarily well-studied subfamily Nymphalinae using DNA sequence data from three genes: 1450 bp of cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) (in the mitochondrial genome), 1077 bp of elongation factor 1-alpha (EF1-a) and 400–403 bp of wing- less (both in the nuclear genome). We explore the influence of each gene region on the support given to each node of the most parsimonious tree derived from a combined analysis of all three genes using Partitioned Bremer Support. We also explore the influence of assuming equal weights for all characters in the combined analysis by investigating the stability of clades to different transition/transversion weighting schemes. We find many strongly supported and stable clades in the Nymphalinae. We are also able to identify ‘rogue’
    [Show full text]
  • Mitochondrial Genomes of Hestina Persimilis and Hestinalis Nama (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae): Genome Description and Phylogenetic Implications
    insects Article Mitochondrial Genomes of Hestina persimilis and Hestinalis nama (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae): Genome Description and Phylogenetic Implications Yupeng Wu 1,2,*, Hui Fang 1, Jiping Wen 2,3, Juping Wang 2, Tianwen Cao 2,* and Bo He 4 1 School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China; [email protected] 2 College of Plant Protection, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taiyuan 030031, China; [email protected] (J.W.); [email protected] (J.W.) 3 Department of Horticulture, Taiyuan University, Taiyuan 030012, China 4 College of Life Sciences, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu 241000, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (Y.W.); [email protected] (T.C.) Simple Summary: In this study, the mitogenomes of Hestina persimilis and Hestinalis nama were obtained via sanger sequencing. Compared with other mitogenomes of Apaturinae butterflies, conclusions can be made that the mitogenomes of Hestina persimilis and Hestinalis nama are highly conservative. The phylogenetic trees build upon mitogenomic data showing that the relationships among Nymphalidae are similar to previous studies. Hestinalis nama is apart from Hestina, and closely related to Apatura, forming a monophyletic clade. Citation: Wu, Y.; Fang, H.; Wen, J.; Wang, J.; Cao, T.; He, B. Abstract: In this study, the complete mitochondrial genomes (mitogenomes) of Hestina persimilis Mitochondrial Genomes of Hestina and Hestinalis nama (Nymphalidae: Apaturinae) were acquired. The mitogenomes of H. persimilis persimilis and Hestinalis nama and H. nama are 15,252 bp and 15,208 bp in length, respectively. These two mitogenomes have the (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae): typical composition, including 37 genes and a control region.
    [Show full text]
  • Running Head 1 the AGE of BUTTERFLIES REVISITED
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/259184; this version posted February 2, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Running head 2 THE AGE OF BUTTERFLIES REVISITED (AND TESTED) 3 Title 4 The Trials and Tribulations of Priors and Posteriors in Bayesian Timing of 5 Divergence Analyses: the Age of Butterflies Revisited. 6 7 Authors 8 NICOLAS CHAZOT1*, NIKLAS WAHLBERG1, ANDRÉ VICTOR LUCCI FREITAS2, 9 CHARLES MITTER3, CONRAD LABANDEIRA3,4, JAE-CHEON SOHN5, RANJIT KUMAR 10 SAHOO6, NOEMY SERAPHIM7, RIENK DE JONG8, MARIA HEIKKILÄ9 11 Affiliations 12 1Department of Biology, Lunds Universitet, Sölvegatan 37, 223 62, Lund, Sweden. 13 2Departamento de Biologia Animal, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de 14 Campinas (UNICAMP), Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz, Caixa postal 6109, 15 Barão Geraldo 13083-970, Campinas, SP, Brazil. 16 3Department of Entomology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, U.S.A. 17 4Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian 18 Institution, Washington, DC 20013, USA; Department of Entomology and BEES 19 Program, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20741; and Key Lab of Insect 20 Evolution and Environmental Change, School of Life Sciences, Capital Normal 21 University, Beijing 100048, bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/259184; this version posted February 2, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
    [Show full text]
  • An Updated Checklist of Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera) from Tsirang District, Bhutan
    CHECKLIST Vol. 19, 2018 CHECKLIST ARTICLE ISSN 2319–5746 EISSN 2319–5754 Species An Updated Checklist of Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera) from Tsirang district, Bhutan Jatishwor Singh Irungbam1, 2☼, Meenakshi Jatishwor Irungbam1, 2 1. Faculty of Science, The University of South Bohemia, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic. 2. Institute of Entomology, Biology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic. ☼Corresponding author: Email: [email protected] Article History Received: 16 May 2018 Accepted: 27 June 2018 Published: July 2018 Citation Jatishwor Singh Irungbam, Meenakshi Jatishwor Irungbam. An Updated Checklist of Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera) from Tsirang district, Bhutan. Species, 2018, 19, 55-67 Publication License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. General Note Article is recommended to print as color digital version in recycled paper. ABSTRACT The study was carried out at Tsirang District at Southern Bhutan during April 2015 to December 2015 for 7 months. The aim of the study was to collect the baseline data on the butterfly diversity from the district to evaluate the species diversity and of conservation importance. Twelve study sites were identified and recorded the butterfly communities in the area. During the study, 241 species belongs to 131 genera under 5 families were recorded. The family Nymphalidae was the most common (44 %, n=106), followed by Lycaenidae (20.3%, n= 49), Hesperiidae (14.9%, n=36), Pieridae (12.9%, n= 31) and lowest Papilionidae (7.9 %, n=19) in the study area. Among which thirty-two species recorded are protected in India under various schedules of Indian Wildlife (Protection) Act of 1972, but none of these species are protected under Forest and Nature Conservation Act (1995) or Forest and Nature Conservation Rules of Bhutan (2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera) Communities in Korea: Conservation and Maintenance of Red Listed Species
    Eur. J. Entomol. 112(4): 770–777, 2015 doi: 10.14411/eje.2015.099 ISSN 1210-5759 (print), 1802-8829 (online) Effect of military activity on butterfly (Lepidoptera) communities in Korea: Conservation and maintenance of red listed species SUNG-SOO KIM 1, TAE-SUNG KWON 2 and CHEOL MIN LEE 3, * 1 Research Institute for East Asian Environment and Biology, 293-27 Amsa 3 dong, Angdong-gu, Seoul 143-203, Republic of Korea; e-mail: [email protected] 2 Division of Forest Insect Pests and Diseases, Korea Forest Research Institute, 57 Hoegi-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 130-712, Republic of Korea; e-mail: [email protected] 3 Center for Forest and Climate Change, Korea Forest Research Institute, 57 Hoegi-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 130-712, Republic of Korea; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Lepidoptera, butterflies, red listed species, military training area, grassland, conservation Abstract. Military training areas are increasingly recognized as areas of high biodiversity and habitats for many wild organisms, in- cluding threatened or endangered species. However, the information on the ecological value of military training areas is limited because it is difficult access these sites. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of military activity on butterfly communities. The survey was carried out in a military training area (MTA) at Inje-gun near the demilitarized zone (DMZ), Inje forest (IJF) a secondary forest and Gwangneung forest (GWF) an old growth forest, from April to October 2008 to 2011. IJF and GWF were selected in order to determine the characteristics of a butterfly community differed in a MTA.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist
    Butterflies of India – Annotated Checklist By Paul Van Gasse (Kruibeke, Belgium; Email: [email protected]), Aug. 2013. Family Hesperiidae Subfamily Coeliadinae 1. Burara oedipodea (Branded Orange Awlet) B.o.ataphus: Sri Lanka. NR – Ceylon 17 B.o.belesis: Kangra to Arunachal, NE India, and Burma to Dawnas (= aegina, athena) – NW Himalayas (Kangra-Kumaon) 11, Sikkim 30, Bhutan 2, Assam 28, Burma (to Dawnas) 9 B.o.oedipodea: Probably S Burma. [Given as Ismene oedipodea in Evans, 1932, and as Bibasis oedipodea in Evans, 1949] 2. Burara tuckeri (Tucker’s Awlet) Burma in Tavoy. VR – Tavoy 1 [Given as Ismene tuckeri in Evans, 1932, and as Bibasis tuckeri in Evans, 1949] 3. Burara jaina (Orange Awlet) B.j.fergusonii: SW India to N Maharashtra. NR – S India 33 B.j.jaina: HP (Solan) and Garhwal to Arunachal, NE India, and Burma to Karens. NR (= vasundhara) – NW Himalayas (Dun-Kumaon) 3, Sikkim 18, Assam 37, Burma (Karens) 1 B.j.margana: Burma in Dawnas. R – Burma (Dawnas) 8 B.j.astigmata: S Andamans. VR – Andamans 3 [Given as Ismene jaina in Evans, 1932, and vasundhara was there given as the subspecies ranging from Assam to Karens, with jaina then confined to Mussoorie to Sikkim; given as Bibasis jaina in Evans, 1949] 4. Burara anadi (Plain Orange Awlet) Garhwal to NE India and Burma to Karens. R (= purpurea) – Mussoorie 1, Sikkim 13, Assam 1, Burma (Karens) 5 [Given as Ismene anadi in Evans, 1932, and as Bibasis anadi in Evans, 1949] 5. Burara etelka (Great Orange Awlet) NE India (Kabaw Valley in Manipur).
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of BES 2015 2.3.3
    Review Paper Checklist of Butterflies of Bhutan Irungbam Jatishwor Singh1*and Meenakshi Singh Chib2 Bhutanitis ludlowi (Photo credit: Karma Wangdi) AbstractNational Butterfly of Bhutan, species (Papilionidae (16 species), Pieridae (10 The review of literature reveals that a complete species), Lycaenidae (38 species), Nymphalidae never been published. A few studies have been listed as rare or very rare in Indian literature, checklist on the butterfly fauna of Bhutan has which(93 species) does not and mean Hesperiidae they are (25 rare species) in Bhutan. are 120 species are protected under different currentlyconducted noton butterfliesavailable. ofThe Bhutan, present however, study schedules of Indian Wildlife Protection Act, aimsa comprehensive to provide preciselist on data butterfly on the fauna known is from Bhutan are included in the protected 2002. None of the butterfly species reported presents a checklist based on the review of schedules of Forest and Nature Conservation butterfly fauna of Bhutan. This document Rules, 2006 of Bhutan except Bhutanitis apilionidae (55 ludlowi available literature on the butterflies of Bhutan. 1 2 Gabriel, 1942 (Ludlow’s Bhutan Glory). (160It comprises species), 670 Nymphalidae species; P (265 species), Mendrelgang Central School, Tsirang species), Pieridae (51 species), Lycaenidae gmail.com *Corresponding Author’s email: jatishwor.irungbam@ and Hesperiidae (139 species). Of these, 182 22 (RAP), USA and Royal Society for Protection of through participation of specialists, amateur lepidopteristsInventory research and activitiesrelevant authoritiesof butterfly faunain all parts of Bhutan is necessary and advisable. providesNature (RSPN), a brief Bhutanidea on produced the rich diversitya butterfly of booklet which was the first of its kind which Key words: Poelbutterfly who inwas Bhutan.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Species of Chitoria M O O R E , 1896 from Central China
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Atalanta Jahr/Year: 2009 Band/Volume: 40 Autor(en)/Author(s): Lang Song-Yun, Xue Dayong, Cao Tian-Wen Artikel/Article: A new species of Chitoria Moore, 1896 from Central China 487-491 ©Ges. zur Förderung d. Erforschung von Insektenwanderungen e.V. München, download unter www.zobodat.at Atalanla 40 (3/4): 487-491, Wurzburg (2009), ISSN 0171-0079 A new species of Chitoria M o o r e , 1896 from Central China (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae) by Song -Y un L ang , D a -Y ong X ue & T ian -W en C ao received 11. VII.2009 Abstract: A new species, Chitoria leei L ang spec, nov., from Hubei Province of Central China is described and illustrated. The new species is different from those previously known in both external and genitalia characters. A check list including all known taxa of Chitoria M oore , 1896 is provided along with their distribution. Introduction: Chitoria M oore , 1896 is an oriental genus belonging to the nymphalid subfamily Apaturinae. Until now, 8 species are known for the genus Chitoria. Among all species of this genus, C. iilupi (D oherty , 1889) and C. chrysolora (F ruhstorfer , 1908) can form a separate species group, namely the ulupi group. Species of the uhipi-group are sexual dimorphic, their ground colour on the dorsal surface of both wings in cfcf are orange yellow or tawny. Recently, a cf specimen collected from Mt. Shennongjia of the Central China has been studied by the first author.
    [Show full text]
  • Gene and Taxon Sampling
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION I - Gene and taxon sampling We based our analyses on 11 gene regions: the mitochondrial COI gene (1473 bp) and the nuclear genes ArgKin (596 bp), CAD (850 bp), DDC (373 bp), EF1a (1240 bp), GAPDH (691 bp), IDH (710 bp), MDH (733 bp), RpS5 (617 bp), RpS2 (411 bp), and wingless (412 bp). These gene regions have been used extensively in molecular systematic studies of Nymphalidae. Most unpublished sequences that we use have been generated according to protocols reported in Wahlberg and Wheat (2008). We assembled our dataset from two databases: our own VoSeq (Peña and Malm 2012) and BoLD (Ratnasingham & Hebert 2007). From each of these databases we extracted all the individuals classified as “Nymphalidae”, which gave us 10,477 individuals and 23,138 individuals respectively (as of May 2016). In the VoSeq dataset, we filtered multiple hits of species names by keeping only one species representative having the highest number of base pairs available. This first list of taxa was compared to the dataset imported from BoLD, which allowed adding 415 taxa absent from VoSeq for a total of 3,070 taxa. This list of taxa was further cleaned by checking for misspellings of names leading to multiple representatives per species. We also removed all the barcode sequences imported from BoLD that were not associated with a published paper on GenBank. We checked for the validity of all species names, mostly relying on online resources (e.g. http://ftp.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/papilionoidea/nymphalidae/). When we encountered a disagreement on taxon assignment we searched for the most recent relevant source of information to decide whether the taxon was included as a valid species or removed.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies of India – Annotated Checklist
    1 *Hello friends, When I was looking for a good checklist of the butterflies of the Indian region a few months ago, I had to conclude that no such dependable modern list existed. The last comprehensive list was still the one in Evans (1932), which included the whole Indian region and Burma. I then decided to make such a list myself, with the same geographical coverage. I started, of course, from the great Evans, then incorporating his revisions of the Hesperiidae and the Arhopala group of Lycaenidae, then Talbot for the Papilionidae, Pieridae, Danainae, Satyrinae, Amathusiinae, and Acraeinae, and then Cantlie for the Lycaenidae other than the Arhopala group. Then several later revisions were consulted and comparisons were made with several modern lists. Sequence, at least among genera, was largely based on Varshney (2010), though for families I prefer the sequence Hesperiidae-Papilionidae-Pieridae-Lycaenidae- Nymphalidae. In the list, I have retained synonyms and full reference to Evans, since I have seen that many people still refer to that publication; this would then also apply to Wynter-Blyth's book, which basically used the same nomenclature as Evans. The list I have made is in Word, and contains 160 pages. If anyone wants a copy of it, please let me know, and I will be glad to send it to you. Also, if someone would like to put it on a webpage, be my guest. Best regards, Paul Van Gasse Kruibeke, Belgium *The original text from Paul Van Gasse‟s mail in Yahoo ButterflyIndia Group. Butterflies of India – Annotated Checklist Family Hesperiidae Subfamily Coeliadinae 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Host Repertoires and the Diversification of Butterflies
    Evolution of host repertoires and the diversification of butterflies Mariana Pires Braga Academic dissertation for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Animal Ecology at Stockholm University to be publicly defended on Friday 15 February 2019 at 10.00 in Vivi Täckholmsalen (Q-salen), NPQ-huset, Svante Arrhenius väg 20. Abstract All herbivorous insects are specialized to some extent to their host plants, but the level of specialization varies greatly. Insect-plant coevolution is often invoked to explain the large diversity of herbivorous insects, but the role of specialization during diversification is still controversial. Although well-studied, our understanding of the evolution of species interactions is still improving, and recent theoretical developments have highlighted the role of generalization (via colonization of new hosts) on diversification. In this thesis, various approaches are combined for a detailed study of the origins of macroevolutionary patterns of host use and butterfly diversity. Chapter I provides a mechanistic basis for such patterns through simulations of lineages evolved in silico. By separating the effects of the number of hosts used by a parasite lineage and the diversity of resources they encompass, we found that resource diversity, rather than host range per se, was the main driver of parasite species richness in both simulated and empirical systems. In Chapter II, we combined network and phylogenetic analyses to quantify support for the two main hypothesized drivers of diversification of herbivorous insects. Based on analyses of two butterfly families, Nymphalidae and Pieridae, we found that variability in host use is essential for diversification, while radiation following the colonization of a new host is rare but can produce high diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Progress in Natural Science 18 (2008) 1357–1364 www.elsevier.com/locate/pnsc Phylogenetic relationship and morphological evolution in the subfamily Limenitidinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) Min Zhang a, Yang Zhong b, Tianwen Cao c, Yupeng Geng b, Yuan Zhang b, Ke Jin b, Zhumei Ren a, Rui Zhang a, Yaping Guo a, Enbo Ma a,* a Research Institute of Applied Biology and College of Life Science and Technology, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030006, China b School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China c Institute of Plant Protection, Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Science, Taiyuan 030031, China Received 28 January 2008; received in revised form 29 February 2008; accepted 25 March 2008 Abstract The mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) gene and the nuclear elongation factor 1a (EF-1a) gene were sequenced from 29 species of Nymphalidae (Nymphalidae, Lepidoptera). Phylogenetic trees were constructed based on the sequences determined from the 29 species and sequences of other 36 species deposited in GenBank using the neighbor-joining (NJ), maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian methods with Libythea celtis (Libytheinae) as the outgroup. Our phylogenetic trees indicated four major clades. Clade A includes three subfamilies: Apaturinae, Nymphalinae, and Limenitidinae, excluding the tribe Limenitidini; Clade B includes the subfam- ilies Heliconiinae and the tribe Limenitidini; Clade C includes Satyrinae, Calinaginae, Charaxinae and Morphinae; and Clade D includes subfamily Danainae. Our study suggested that the tribes Pseudergolini, Biblidini, Limenitidini and Cyrestidini should be considered as subfamilies and confirmed the interspecific relationships within the subfamily Pseudergolinae, namely Amnosia +(Pseudergolis +(Stibo- chiona + Dichorragia)).
    [Show full text]