DOCSLIB.ORG

Full and Secondary Palatalization

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO A Crosslinguistic Investigation of Palatalization A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics by Nicoleta Bateman Committee in charge: Professor Sharon Rose, Chair Professor Eric Bakovic Professor Jessica Barlow Professor Jeffrey Elman Professor Maria Polinsky 2007 The Dissertation of Nicoleta Bateman is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm: _____________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________ Chair University of California, San Diego 2007 iii I dedicate this dissertation to my family. Aceasta teza este dedicata familiei mele. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature page ………………………………………………………………………..iii Dedication……………………………………………………………………………..iv Table of contents……………………………………………………………………….v Chart of symbols ……………………………………………………………………..xii List of figures………………………………………………………………………...xiii List of tables…………………………………………………………………………xiv Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………..…xvi Vita……………………………………………………………………………………xx Abstract………………………………………………………………………………xxi Chapter 1. Setting the Stage …………………………………………………………..1 1.1 Introduction …………………………………………………………………..1 1.2 Goals and organization ……………………………………………………….3 1.3 Dimensions of palatalization …………………………………………………5 1.3.1 The finer-grained palatalizing contexts …………………………..........10 1.4 Previous surveys on palatalization ………………………………………12 1.4.1 Chen (1973) …………………………………………………….13 1.4.2 Bhat (1978): Generalized study of palatalization ………..……15 1.4.2.1 Palatalization targets ………………………………...16 1.4.2.2 Palatalization triggers ……………………………..…17 1.4.3 Hall (2000): rhotics vs. non-rhotics ………………………..….18 1.4.4 Brief comparison with current survey …………………............20 v 1.5 Previous analyses of palatalization………………………………..……..21 1.5.1 Sagey (1986): Spreading of Dorsal [-back] feature.……..…….22 1.5.2 Clements/Hume (1989, 1994, 1995): Spreading of Coronal from the V-Place node …………...………………………………...23 1.5.3 Lahiri and Evers (1991) ……………………………………….26 1.5.4 Evaluating feature geometry analyses…………………………28 1.6 Proposed analysis ………………………………………………….…….30 Chapter 2. Palatalization in the language survey…………………………………….32 2.1 The language sample …………………………………………………….33 2.1.1 All languages surveyed……..……………………………..…...36 2.1.2 Languages with palatalization……………………...…………..37 2.1.3 Languages without palatalization ………………………..……40 2.2 Full palatalization……………………………………………………..….44 2.2.1 Full palatalization targets: general patterns……………….……44 2.2.2 Full palatalization targets: morpho-phonological vs. phonological………………………………………………… .47 2.3 Secondary palatalization………………………………………………....49 2.3.1 Secondary palatalization targets: general patterns……………49 2.3.2 Secondary palatalization targets: morpho-phonological vs. Phonological ………………………………………………….52 2.4 General remarks on palatalization patterns ………………………….…..54 2.5 Detail on full and secondary palatalization targets ………………….…..56 vi 2.6 Interim summary: palatalization targets…………………………….……60 2.7 Palatalization triggers…………………………………………………….62 2.7.1 What are the triggers?...............................................................62 2.7.1.1 High back vowel triggers……………………….…….68 2.7.1.2 Lonely trigger, needs support …………………..……70 2.7.1.3 Rare palatalization triggers and outcomes……..……..72 2.7.2 Position of the trigger with respect to the target………..…….75 2.7.2.1 Trigger immediately adjacent to the target………..….75 2.7.2.2 “Long distance” palatalization (trigger not immediately adjacent to target) …………………………………….77 2.7.3 Fate of palatalization trigger …………………………………..82 2.8 Chapter conclusions……………………………………………………...84 Chapter 3. Full palatalization of labials ……………………………………………..89 3.1 Romanian: the case of Moldavian……………………………………….90 3.1.1 Synchronic situation of labial palatalization in Moldavian.….93 3.1.1.1 Labial palatalization in plural forms and verbs………94 3.1.1.2 Palatalization within roots……………………………99 3.1.2 Diachronic progression of ‘labial palatalization’……………100 3.1.3 Outside evidence for glide hardening……………………….110 3.2 Labial palatalization in Romance………………………………………113 3.2.1 Developments from earlier Latin to later Latin……………..114 3.2.1.1 First palatalization in Romance……………………..115 vii 3.2.1.1.1 Hiatus resolution and palatal glide formation………………………………...115 3.2.1.1.2 Glide hardening……………...…………..117 3.2.1.2 Second palatalization in Romance…………………..118 3.2.2 Interim conclusion……………………………………….…..121 3.3 Labial palatalization in Romance……………………………………….122 3.4 Tswana (Southern Bantu, Botswana)………………………...…………131 3.4.1 Contexts for labial palatalization in Tswana…………….…..132 3.4.1.1 Palatalization in causative formation…………….….134 3.4.1.2 Palatalization in passive formation…………….……137 3.4.1.3 Palatalization in diminutive formation………………140 3.4.2 Explanation of labial palatalization in Tswana…………..….146 3.4.2.1 Labial palatalization as consonant mutation…….…..147 3.4.2.2 Labial palatalization as dissimilation…………..……150 3.4.2.3 Labial palatalization as misperception……….…….. 154 3.4.2.4 Proposed historical explanation of labial palatalization………………………………………...159 3.4.2.4.1 Development of palatalization in the causative and diminutive…………..……166 3.4.2.4.2 Development of palatalization in the passive ……..……………………….…...171 3.5 Interim conclusion………………………………………………………173 3.6 Other research on full labial palatalization……………………………..174 viii 3.6.1 Ohala (1978)…………………………………………….…..174 3.6.2 Bhat (1978)……………………………………………….…175 3.6.2.1 Chontal (Hokan, Tequistlatecan, Mexico)…………..176 3.6.2.2 Fula (Niger-Congo, Fulani-Wolof, Cameroon)……..178 3.6.2.3 Lumaasaba (Narrow Bantu, Uganda)……………….179 3.7 Prior analyses of labial palatalization………………………………..…181 3.7.1 Acoustic/Perceptual analyses…………………………..……181 3.8 Conclusion………………………………………………………….…..184 Chapter 4. Analysis of Palatalization Targets…………………………………..…..185 4.1 Articulatory Phonology……………………………………………..…..187 4.1.1 Gestural coordination………………………………………..194 4.1.1.1 Temporal overlap and “hidden” gestures……………195 4.1.1.2 Temporal overlap and blending……………………..201 4.1.2 Articulatory Phonology, Optimality Theory, and Palatalization...........................................................................203 4.2 A unified account of palatalization targets………………………….…..208 4.2.1 Typology of palatalization……………………………….….214 4.2.2 No full palatalization of labials………………………….…..219 4.2.3 Full palatalization patterns…………………………………..225 4.2.4 Secondary palatalization patterns……………………………235 4.2.5 Mixed full/secondary palatalization patterns………………..248 ix 4.2.6 Morpho-phonological vs. phonological palatalization contexts……………………………………………….……..259 4.3 Conclusion……………………………………………………….……..264 Chapter 5. Analysis of Palatalization Triggers……………………………….…….266 5.1 Distinguishing between i and j …………………………………………267 5.2 Palatalization trigger hierarchies………………………………………..272 5.2.1 Palatalization trigger hierarchies in OT……………………..280 5.3 Position of the palatalization trigger……………………………………287 5.4 Trigger “fate”…………………………………………………………...292 5.5 Conclusion...……………………………………………………………295 Chapter 6. Conclusion………………………………………………………………297 Appendices……………………………………………………………………..……301 A 1. Language sample (117 languages, 86 genera)………………….……..301 A 2. Palatalization patterns for each language………………………..…….305 A 3. Full and secondary palatalization at the same POA……………..…….310 A 4. Trigger fate……………………………………………………….……311 A 5. Palatalization targets and their outcomes……………………….……..313 A 6. Intermediate stags of ‘labial palatalization’ in Bantu (Guthrie 1970)....317 A 7. A case of apparent labial-palatalization: Ikalanga……………...….….319 A 8. Database entries……………………………..see supplementary materials x References…………………………………………………………………….……..321 Additional references (languages without palatalization, not referenced elsewhere)…………………………………………………...337 xi CHART OF SYMBOLS Source IPA Source description IPA description symbol symbol s Prepalatal fricative Alveolo-palatal fricative (voiceless) (voiceless) z Prepalatal fricative Alveolo-palatal fricative (voiced) (voiced) c Prepalatal affricate t Alveolo-palatal affricate (voiceless) t (voiceless) Prepalatal affricate dz d Alveolo-palatal affricate (voiced) (voiced) d n Prepalatal nasal Palatal nasal (alveolo-palatal nasal) Post-alveolar fricative Post-alveolar fricative/Palato- s (voiceless) alveolar fricative (voiceless) Post-alveolar fricative Post-alveolar fricative/Palato- z (voiced) alveolar fricative (voiced) c Post-alveolar affricate Post-alveolar affricate/Palato- c t (voiceless) alveolar affricate (voiceless) ts j Post-alveolar affricate Post-alveolar affricate/Palato- g d (voiced) alveolar affricate (voiced) dz Dental affricate c ts Dental affricate (voiceless) (voiceless) Dental affricate dz dz Dental affricate (voiced) (voiced) C’ Palatalized consonant C Palatalized consonant t’ tense t (Korean) t’ tense t (Korean) s’ tense s (Korean) s’ tense s (Korean) C’ C’ Glottalized consonant (ejective) C x centro-domal fricative ?? no known symbol voiceless bilabial f voiceless bilabial fricative fricative i u superclosed high vowels (in Bantu) ι semi-close high vowel xii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1 Palatal region of the vocal tract.....……...…………………………………6
Recommended publications
  • Comparing a Surface Collection to an Excavated Collection in the Lower Skagit River Delta at 45SK51

    Comparing a Surface Collection to an Excavated Collection in the Lower Skagit River Delta at 45SK51

    Central Washington University ScholarWorks@CWU All Master's Theses Master's Theses Summer 2017 Comparing a Surface Collection to an Excavated Collection in the Lower Skagit River Delta at 45SK51 Sherri M. Middleton Central Washington University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.cwu.edu/etd Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons, and the Other History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Recommended Citation Middleton, Sherri M., "Comparing a Surface Collection to an Excavated Collection in the Lower Skagit River Delta at 45SK51" (2017). All Master's Theses. 711. https://digitalcommons.cwu.edu/etd/711 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Master's Theses at ScholarWorks@CWU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@CWU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COMPARING A SURFACE COLLECTION TO AN EXCAVATED COLLECTION IN THE LOWER SKAGIT RIVER DELTA AT 45SK51 ________________________________________________________________________ A Thesis Presented to The Graduate Faculty Central Washington University ________________________________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Cultural and Environmental Resource Management _______________________________________________________________________ by Sherri Michelle Middleton June 2017 CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY Graduate Studies We hereby approve the
  • Phonological Domains Within Blackfoot Towards a Family-Wide Comparison

    Phonological Domains Within Blackfoot Towards a Family-Wide Comparison

    Phonological domains within Blackfoot Towards a family-wide comparison Natalie Weber 52nd algonquian conference yale university October 23, 2020 Outline 1. Background 2. Two phonological domains in Blackfoot verbs 3. Preverbs are not a separate phonological domain 4. Parametric variation 2 / 59 Background 3 / 59 Consonant inventory Labial Coronal Dorsal Glottal Stops p pː t tː k kː ʔ <’> Assibilants ts tːs ks Pre-assibilants ˢt ˢtː Fricatives s sː x <h> Nasals m mː n nː Glides w j <y> (w) Long consonants written with doubled letters. (Derrick and Weber n.d.; Weber 2020) 4 / 59 Predictable mid vowels? (Frantz 2017) Many [ɛː] and [ɔː] arise from coalescence across boundaries ◦ /a+i/ ! [ɛː] ◦ /a+o/ ! [ɔː] Vowel inventory front central back high i iː o oː mid ɛː <ai> ɔː <ao> low a aː (Derrick and Weber n.d.; Weber 2020) 5 / 59 Vowel inventory front central back high i iː o oː mid ɛː <ai> ɔː <ao> low a aː Predictable mid vowels? (Frantz 2017) Many [ɛː] and [ɔː] arise from coalescence across boundaries ◦ /a+i/ ! [ɛː] ◦ ! /a+o/ [ɔː] (Derrick and Weber n.d.; Weber 2020) 5 / 59 Contrastive mid vowels Some [ɛː] and [ɔː] are morpheme-internal, in overlapping environments with other long vowels JɔːníːtK JaːníːtK aoníít aaníít [ao–n/i–i]–t–Ø [aan–ii]–t–Ø [hole–by.needle/ti–ti1]–2sg.imp–imp [say–ai]–2sg.imp–imp ‘pierce it!’ ‘say (s.t.)!’ (Weber 2020) 6 / 59 Syntax within the stem Intransitive (bi-morphemic) vs. syntactically transitive (trimorphemic). Transitive V is object agreement (Quinn 2006; Rhodes 1994) p [ root –v0 –V0 ] Stem type Gloss ikinn –ssi AI ‘he is warm’ ikinn –ii II ‘it is warm’ itap –ip/i –thm TA ‘take him there’ itap –ip/ht –oo TI ‘take it there’ itap –ip/ht –aki AI(+O) ‘take (s.t.) there’ (Déchaine and Weber 2015, 2018; Weber 2020) 7 / 59 Syntax within the verbal complex Template p [ person–(preverb)*– [ –(med)–v–V ] –I0–C0 ] CP vP root vP CP ◦ Minimal verbal complex: stem plus suffixes (I0,C0).
  • UC Berkeley Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society

    UC Berkeley Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society

    UC Berkeley Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society Title Perception of Illegal Contrasts: Japanese Adaptations of Korean Coda Obstruents Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6x34v499 Journal Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 36(36) ISSN 2377-1666 Author Whang, James D. Y. Publication Date 2016 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTY SIXTH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE BERKELEY LINGUISTICS SOCIETY February 6-7, 2010 General Session Special Session Language Isolates and Orphans Parasession Writing Systems and Orthography Editors Nicholas Rolle Jeremy Steffman John Sylak-Glassman Berkeley Linguistics Society Berkeley, CA, USA Berkeley Linguistics Society University of California, Berkeley Department of Linguistics 1203 Dwinelle Hall Berkeley, CA 94720-2650 USA All papers copyright c 2016 by the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Inc. All rights reserved. ISSN: 0363-2946 LCCN: 76-640143 Contents Acknowledgments v Foreword vii Basque Genitive Case and Multiple Checking Xabier Artiagoitia . 1 Language Isolates and Their History, or, What's Weird, Anyway? Lyle Campbell . 16 Putting and Taking Events in Mandarin Chinese Jidong Chen . 32 Orthography Shapes Semantic and Phonological Activation in Reading Hui-Wen Cheng and Catherine L. Caldwell-Harris . 46 Writing in the World and Linguistics Peter T. Daniels . 61 When is Orthography Not Just Orthography? The Case of the Novgorod Birchbark Letters Andrew Dombrowski . 91 Gesture-to-Speech Mismatch in the Construction of Problem Solving Insight J.T.E. Elms . 101 Semantically-Oriented Vowel Reduction in an Amazonian Language Caleb Everett . 116 Universals in the Visual-Kinesthetic Modality: Politeness Marking Features in Japanese Sign Language (JSL) Johnny George .
  • Effectiveness of Explicit Instruction in Pronunciation of English Unfamiliar Sounds: a Case Study of M.5 Students at Darussalam School, Narathiwat Province

    Effectiveness of Explicit Instruction in Pronunciation of English Unfamiliar Sounds: a Case Study of M.5 Students at Darussalam School, Narathiwat Province

    Effectiveness of Explicit Instruction in Pronunciation of English Unfamiliar Sounds: A Case Study of M.5 Students at Darussalam School, Narathiwat Province Nurhaswanee Boto A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Master of Arts Degree in Teaching English as an International Language Prince of Songkla University 2010 Copyright of Prince of Songkla University i ! " #$": &'(" ! # )## '(" * 5 , ) - ! .#/#) 01 12# 3 " #$"4 " 3 * '(" 2009 .##8 8 #39 /-# 1) '(" 1 1 # ! ! " #$" 3 - =! " (/ɡ/ /v/ /θ/ /ð/ /s/ /z/ /ʃ/ - /dʒ/ ) ) 4 /1 . ( /-s/ /-z/ - /-iz / ) -))3 - ( /-t/ /-d/ - /-id / ) 2) '(" ! " #$" 3) '(" #' 3 # 3 ! " #$" - 3# 4 # -/? '-@ #8 # '(" * 5 , ) - .#/#) .A 64 .##8 8) D1- ! '(" / (* '(" 2552 - 3# )914 2 - - .A 32 -- )-.A 32 ! .##8/) 4 ) 0 1 8 E ! .A 4 0 0 ! #8 .A 10 0 )/-# -9 ##' 33 ! " #$" ! #) / '(" # #8- )A ) ! #) / -#) / # ! - )-)# ! 1 8 E ! -##" ! & # ! - )# 3 ! '(" # #8- )A )/-# F(4 ))# #) '(" 33 ! ! " #$" -/-# /-#. A )/-# - # ! - )-)A 9 # iii #' 33 ! " #$" '(" #' 3 # ! - )- /-#. ) 0- .#! #8 8) 1 1! ! " #$" # #8- #8 1! )#3A - 33 #A #? 93 D3 ) 0- ) /-# # #8- #8 ) 33 #A #? 93 # ! - )-F()# #8 9 ! " #$")) # ! - F()# 3 G #8 ! " #$" 0- - 9 #H # !/)(8 . 8- # ! - )- ))#' 33 ! " #$" F( 9 ) ! " #$" #8 . .0-3#' 3)-#0-3 A D.! ) iv Thesis Title Effectiveness of Explicit Instruction in Pronunciation of English Unfamiliar Sounds: A Case
  • Newsletter — February 2004

    Newsletter — February 2004

    Research Centre for Linguistic Typology Institute for Advanced Study VICTORIA 3086, AUSTRALIA FACSIMILE: +61 3 9467 3053 email: [email protected] http://www.latrobe.edu.au/rclt Newsletter — February 2004 The past year has again been attended by success, in terms of the excellence of Research Fellows, Visiting Fellows and Doctoral Students, both the quality and the quantity of the publications we produce, and the continuing grants and fellowships we attract. The International Workshops we host each year produce seminal volumes that are acknowledged as substantial contributions to the field. RCLT provides a relaxed but intense intellectual milieu which engenders research of the highest order. Who'll be at RCLT in 2004 Besides Professor R. M. W. (Bob) Dixon (Director), Professor Alexandra Y. (Sasha) Aikhenvald (Associate Director) and Ms Siew Peng Condon (Executive Officer), we'll have the following scholars with us this year: Research Fellows — Dr. Nicole Kruspe, on a three-year Research Fellowship, has undertaken a lengthy fieldtrip to work on Ceq Wong, a previously undescribed Northern Aslian language from Malaysia. She will continue writing a draft grammar of this language while working on Mah Meri, another Aslian language from Malaysia. — Dr. Catriona Hyslop, on a La Trobe University Postdoctoral Research Fellowship until February 2004, will then take up at RCLT her two year Individual Postgraduate Fellowship from the Endangered Languages Documentation Programme. She will continue working on the documentation of the grammar, lexicon and oral tradition of the Vurës language of west Vanua Lava, Vanuatu. — Dr. Stephen Morey is a La Trobe University Postdoctoral Research Fellow.
  • A North Caucasian Etymological Dictionary

    A North Caucasian Etymological Dictionary

    S. L. Nikolayev S. A. Starostin A NORTH CAUCASIAN ETYMOLOGICAL DICTIONARY Edited by S. A. Starostin ***************** ****************ASTERISK PUBLISHERS * Moscow * 1994 The two volumes contain a systematic reconstruction of the phonology and vocabulary of Proto-North-Caucasian - the ancestor of numerous modern languages of the Northern Caucasus, as well as of some extinct languages of ancient Anatolia. Created by two leading Russian specialists in linguistic prehistory, the book will be valuable for all specialists in comparative linguistics and history of ancient Near East and Europe. © S. L. Nikolayev, S. A. Starostin 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS Editor' s foreword. , . Preface List of abbreviations Literature I ntr oduct ion Dictionary ? . 200 9 . 236 5 . , . ..............242 a' i ... ' 252 a ............. 275 b ...... 285 c 322 c 3 3 L t ^39 C 352 £ 376 : 381 d 397 e 409 4 2 5 Y 474 B 477 h 48 5 h 5 00 h 5 0 3 H 342 i 625 i 669 j '. 6 7 3 k. 68 7 fc 715 I 7 4 2 1 : .... 7 5 4 X. ! 7 5 8 X ; 766 X 7 7 3 L 7 86 t. ' 7 87 n 844 o. 859 p. 865 p. 878 q . 882 q 907 r. ..... 943 s... i 958 s. 973 S. 980 t . 990 t 995 ft. ...... 1009 u 1010 u 1013 V 1016 w. 1039 x 1060 X. ........ 1067 z. ... 1084 z 1086 2. 1089 3 1 090 3 1101 5 1105 I ndices. 1111 5 EDITOR'S FOREWORD This dictionary has a long history. The idea of composing it was already ripe in 1979, and the basic cardfiles were composed in 1980-1983, during long winter months of our collaboration with S.
  • SSC: the Science of Talking

    SSC: the Science of Talking

    SSC: The Science of Talking (for year 1 students of medicine) Week 3: Sounds of the World’s Languages (vowels and consonants) Michael Ashby, Senior Lecturer in Phonetics, UCL PLIN1101 Introduction to Phonetics and Phonology A Lecture 4 page 1 Vowel Description Essential reading: Ashby & Maidment, Chapter 5 4.1 Aim: To introduce the basics of vowel description and the main characteristics of the vowels of RP English. 4.2 Definition of vowel: Vowels are produced without any major obstruction of the airflow; the intra-oral pressure stays low, and vowels are therefore sonorant sounds. Vowels are normally voiced. Vowels are articulated by raising some part of the tongue body (that is the front or the back of the tongue notnot the tip or blade) towards the roof of the oral cavity (see Figure 1). 4.3 Front vowels are produced by raising the front of the tongue towards the hard palate. Back vowels are produced by raising the back of the tongue towards the soft palate. Central vowels are produced by raising the centre part of the tongue towards the junction of the hard and soft palates. 4.4 The height of a vowel refers to the degree of raising of the relevant part of the tongue. If the tongue is raised so as to be close to the roof of the oral cavity then a close or high vowel is produced. If the tongue is only slightly raised, so that there is a wide gap between its highest point and the roof of the oral cavity, then an open or lowlowlow vowel results.
  • The Role of Morphology in Generative Phonology, Autosegmental Phonology and Prosodic Morphology

    The Role of Morphology in Generative Phonology, Autosegmental Phonology and Prosodic Morphology

    Chapter 20: The role of morphology in Generative Phonology, Autosegmental Phonology and Prosodic Morphology 1 Introduction The role of morphology in the rule-based phonology of the 1970’s and 1980’s, from classic GENERATIVE PHONOLOGY (Chomsky and Halle 1968) through AUTOSEGMENTAL PHONOLOGY (e.g., Goldsmith 1976) and PROSODIC MORPHOLOGY (e.g., McCarthy & Prince 1999, Steriade 1988), is that it produces the inputs on which phonology operates. Classic Generative, Autosegmental, and Prosodic Morphology approaches to phonology differ in the nature of the phonological rules and representations they posit, but converge in one key assumption: all implicitly or explicitly assume an item-based morphological approach to word formation, in which root and affix morphemes exist as lexical entries with underlying phonological representations. The morphological component of grammar selects the morphemes whose underlying phonological representations constitute the inputs on which phonological rules operate. On this view of morphology, the phonologist is assigned the task of identifying a set of general rules for a given language that operate correctly on the inputs provided by the morphology of that language to produce grammatical outputs. This assignment is challenging for a variety of reasons, sketched below; as a group, these reasons helped prompt the evolution from classic Generative Phonology to its Autosegmental and Prosodic descendants, and have since led to even more dramatic modifications in the way that morphology and phonology interact (see Chapter XXX). First, not all phonological rules apply uniformly across all morphological contexts. For example, Turkish palatal vowel harmony requires suffix vowels to agree with the preceding stem vowels (paşa ‘pasha’, paşa-lar ‘pasha-PL’; meze ‘appetizer’, meze-ler ‘appetizer-PL’) but does not apply within roots (elma ‘apple’, anne ‘mother’).
  • Reduplicated Numerals in Salish. PUB DATE 1997-00-00 NOTE 11P.; for Complete Volume, See FL 025 251

    Reduplicated Numerals in Salish. PUB DATE 1997-00-00 NOTE 11P.; for Complete Volume, See FL 025 251

    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 419 409 FL 025 252 AUTHOR Anderson, Gregory D. S. TITLE Reduplicated Numerals in Salish. PUB DATE 1997-00-00 NOTE 11p.; For complete volume, see FL 025 251. PUB TYPE Journal Articles (080) Reports Research (143) JOURNAL CIT Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics; v22 n2 p1-10 1997 EDRS PRICE MF01/PC01 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *American Indian Languages; Contrastive Linguistics; Language Patterns; *Language Research; Language Variation; *Linguistic Theory; Number Systems; *Salish; *Structural Analysis (Linguistics); Uncommonly Taught Languages ABSTRACT A salient characteristic of the morpho-lexical systems of the Salish languages is the widespread use of reduplication in both derivational and inflectional functions. Salish reduplication signals such typologically common categories as "distributive/plural," "repetitive/continuative," and "diminutive," the cross-linguistically marked but typically Salish notion of "out-of-control" or more restricted categories in particular Salish languages. In addition to these functions, reduplication also plays a role in numeral systems of the Salish languages. The basic forms of several numerals appear to be reduplicated throughout the Salish family. In addition, correspondences among the various Interior Salish languages suggest the association of certain reduplicative patterns with particular "counting forms" referring to specific nominal categories. While developments in the other Salish language are frequently more idiosyncratic and complex, comparative evidence suggests that the
  • Assibilation Or Analogy?: Reconsideration of Korean Noun Stem-Endings*

    Assibilation Or Analogy?: Reconsideration of Korean Noun Stem-Endings*

    Assibilation or analogy?: Reconsideration of Korean noun stem-endings* Ponghyung Lee (Daejeon University) This paper discusses two approaches to the nominal stem-endings in Korean inflection including loanwords: one is the assibilation approach, represented by H. Kim (2001) and the other is the analogy approach, represented by Albright (2002 et sequel) and Y. Kang (2003b). I contend that the assibilation approach is deficient in handling its underapplication to the non-nominal categories such as verb. More specifically, the assibilation approach is unable to clearly explain why spirantization (s-assibilation) applies neither to derivative nouns nor to non-nominal items in its entirety. By contrast, the analogy approach is able to overcome difficulties involved with the assibilation position. What is crucial to the analogy approach is that the nominal bases end with t rather than s. Evidence of t-ending bases is garnered from the base selection criteria, disparities between t-ending and s-ending inputs in loanwords. Unconventionally, I dare to contend that normative rules via orthography intervene as part of paradigm extension, alongside semantic conditioning and token/type frequency. Keywords: inflection, assibilation, analogy, base, affrication, spirantization, paradigm extension, orthography, token/type frequency 1. Introduction When it comes to Korean nominal inflection, two observations have captivated our attention. First, multiple-paradigms arise, as explored in previous literature (K. Ko 1989, Kenstowicz 1996, Y. Kang 2003b, Albright 2008 and many others).1 (1) Multiple-paradigms of /pʰatʰ/ ‘red bean’ unmarked nom2 acc dat/loc a. pʰat pʰaʧʰ-i pʰatʰ-ɨl pʰatʰ-e b. pʰat pʰaʧʰ-i pʰaʧʰ-ɨl pʰatʰ-e c.
  • A Phonetic, Phonological, and Morphosyntactic Analysis of the Mara Language

    A Phonetic, Phonological, and Morphosyntactic Analysis of the Mara Language

    San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Master's Theses Master's Theses and Graduate Research Spring 2010 A Phonetic, Phonological, and Morphosyntactic Analysis of the Mara Language Michelle Arden San Jose State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses Recommended Citation Arden, Michelle, "A Phonetic, Phonological, and Morphosyntactic Analysis of the Mara Language" (2010). Master's Theses. 3744. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31979/etd.v36r-dk3u https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses/3744 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Master's Theses and Graduate Research at SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A PHONETIC, PHONOLOGICAL, AND MORPHOSYNTACTIC ANALYSIS OF THE MARA LANGUAGE A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Linguistics and Language Development San Jose State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts by Michelle J. Arden May 2010 © 2010 Michelle J. Arden ALL RIGHTS RESERVED The Designated Thesis Committee Approves the Thesis Titled A PHONETIC, PHONOLOGICAL, AND MORPHOSYNTACTIC ANALYSIS OF THE MARA LANGUAGE by Michelle J. Arden APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF LINGUISTICS AND LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY May 2010 Dr. Daniel Silverman Department of Linguistics and Language Development Dr. Soteria Svorou Department of Linguistics and Language Development Dr. Kenneth VanBik Department of Linguistics and Language Development ABSTRACT A PHONETIC, PHONOLOGICAL, AND MORPHOSYNTACTIC ANALYSIS OF THE MARA LANGUAGE by Michelle J. Arden This thesis presents a linguistic analysis of the Mara language, a Tibeto-Burman language spoken in northwest Myanmar and in neighboring districts of India.
  • The Sound Patterns of Camuno: Description and Explanation in Evolutionary Phonology

    The Sound Patterns of Camuno: Description and Explanation in Evolutionary Phonology

    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 6-2014 The Sound Patterns Of Camuno: Description And Explanation In Evolutionary Phonology Michela Cresci Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/191 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] THE SOUND PATTERNS OF CAMUNO: DESCRIPTION AND EXPLANATION IN EVOLUTIONARY PHONOLOGY by MICHELA CRESCI A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Linguistics in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City Universtiy of New York 2014 i 2014 MICHELA CRESCI All rights reserved ii This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Linguistics in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. JULIETTE BLEVINS ____________________ __________________________________ Date Chair of Examining Committee GITA MARTOHARDJONO ____________________ ___________________________________ Date Executive Officer KATHLEEN CURRIE HALL DOUGLAS H. WHALEN GIOVANNI BONFADINI Supervisory Committee THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii Abstract THE SOUND PATTERNS OF CAMUNO: DESCRIPTION AND EXPLANATION IN EVOLUTIONARY PHONOLOGY By Michela Cresci Advisor: Professor Juliette Blevins This dissertation presents a linguistic study of the sound patterns of Camuno framed within Evolutionary Phonology (Blevins, 2004, 2006, to appear). Camuno is a variety of Eastern Lombard, a Romance language of northern Italy, spoken in Valcamonica. Camuno is not a local variety of Italian, but a sister of Italian, a local divergent development of the Latin originally spoken in Italy (Maiden & Perry, 1997, p.