LEBANESE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY the Wise Prince in the Defiant

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

LEBANESE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY the Wise Prince in the Defiant LEBANESE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY The Wise Prince in the Defiant Sayyed A comparative study between The Prince of Niccolo Machiavelli and Hassan Nasrallah’s behavior By MANAL N. SARROUF Thesis Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in International Affairs School of Arts and Sciences June 2011 Thesis approval Form (Annex 111) StudentName: b&.hl& S&?ROOF I.D. #: 2004 004 1 8 Thesis Title : . I, I, b.h~ePjk.ad I-Lsw-I k~c3~dh'5bh~'i8-l Program : %te(n&~l &ns DivisionDept : QUmn &es & -( School School of Arts and Sciences Approved by: rhesis Advisor: D1. &lid Moubak Member : &. &bib r'Jbkk- Member : a bayhb Date (This document will constitute the first page of the Thesis) ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research would not have been possible without the help and assistance of many persons. First I would like to express my gratitude to my supervisor Dr. Walid Moubarak who devotedly guided me throughout the whole process of producing this thesis. I am also deeply grateful to Dr. Habib Malik and Dr. Marwan Rowayheb for being members of my thesis committee. Thanks go also to the Lebanese American University for all the support this institution has offered me throughout my graduate studies. Finally special thanks go also to Nicholas-Georges Matta, my friends, and family for their continuous support and for being a source of motivation. v To my beloved mom and dad vi The Wise Prince in the Defiant Sayyed A comparative study between The Prince of Niccolo Machiavelli and Hassan Nasrallah’s Behavior MANAL N. SARROUF Abstract Hezbollah Secretary General Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah has proved to be one of Lebanon’s most influential political and religious figures in the country’s modern history. His influence has even surpassed Lebanese territories as people rallied in the streets of Egypt, Syria, Iran and other countries glorifying him for the 2006 “Divine Victory” over Israel. While he is adored by many, and even worshiped by some; his political rivals remain skeptical of him, detest him, fear him or at least fear his ideology and his party’s rising power in a weak state like Lebanon. Nasrallah has closely watched the development of Hezbollah since its formation and has contributed to its progress and disputed successes. Given the party’s ascending power and emergence as a major regional military player facing Israel, Nasrallah has become a leader with domestic, regional and international influence since he succeeded assassinated Secretary General Abbas al-Moussawi in 1992. This study delves into all the details of Nasrallah’s biography as well as his religious, ideological and political beliefs and practices. It aims to examine to what extent Nasrallah’s leadership traits resemble those of one of the well-known leadership models, The Princeof Niccolo Machiavelli. The comparison is made between Nasrallah as a person and the fictitious Prince in Machiavelli’s book. The study is aware of the limitations to this comparison such as the difference in time when The Prince was written, back in the 1500s, and modern times. It is also aware of another limitation which is the difference in the type of rule between Machiavelli’s principalities and Lebanon’s republic and as such between the position of Machiavelli’sPrince –as a country ruler- and that of Nasrallah- as a party leader. The study moves from the premise that Hezbollah is the principality ruled by Nasrallah. The study encompasses the following main sections: the acquisition of power, the qualities, the actions and achievements, and the military aspect. It concludes with the limitations to Nasrallah’s leadership which renders it impossible for him to have absolute power without any constraints. Keywords: Hassan Nasrallah, Hezbollah, Lebanon, The Prince, Niccolo Machiavelli, Machiavellian, Leader, Ideology, Wilayat al-Faqih, Jurisdiction Of The Jurist-Theologian, Iran, Syria, Israel, Armed Group, Paramilitary, Weapons, Shura Council vii Table of Contents Chapter page I - INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1-6 II - A Strong Hezbollah in a Weak Lebanon .................................................................... 7-22 III - Who is Hassan Nasrallah, why Hezbollah? ............................................................. 23-34 IV - Machiavelli’s Prince ................................................................................................ 35-40 V - Power in hand, ideology at heart .............................................................................. 41-67 VI - The “Princely” Sayyed .......................................................................................... 68-125 6.1. Part I ....................................................................................................................... 68 6.1.1. Virtue against fury .......................................................................................... 70 6.1.2. Liberality versus Parsimoniousness ................................................................ 77 6.1.3. Feared or Loved .............................................................................................. 84 6.2. Part II ...................................................................................................................... 93 6.2.1. How to keep faith ............................................................................................ 93 6.2.2. Avoiding hate, overcoming conspiracy ........................................................ 100 6.2.3. Acquiring a reputation .................................................................................. 109 VII - Keeping an Army in the field ............................................................................. 126-141 VIII - CONCLUSION:Limitations to Nasrallah’s leadership .................................... 142-149 IX - BIBLIOGRAPHY .................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined.-162 X - APPENDIX ................................................................................................................... 162 viii CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION “We are nobler, higher, grander, purer, more sincere, more virtuous, more faithful and more eminent than that one would dare issue accusations against our patriotic background,” says1 the leader of the Lebanese Shiite militant-political group Hezbollah Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah in one of his 2005 speeches, conveying a clear notion of superiority vis-à-vis his Lebanese counterparts. Nasrallah even goes further in the same speech and challenges the other Lebanese groups inquiring of them about their identity, their past, previous positions, and alliances. Similar rhetoric has been reiterated by the Hezbollah chief on several occasions. This holier-than-attitude has incited abundant responses from various Lebanese political leaders who felt offended by Nasrallah’s words and considered his recurrent statements insulting to their leadership and their masses. When a Shiite leader like Nasrallah addresses his majorly Shiite audience with such words, he is clearly denoting that the times have changed and that his historically marginalized community is no longer the same. It has rather accumulated some sort of power, basically military and political, which Nasrallah relies on in attributing grandeur to his people and in motivating them with such arrogance. One could easily deduce that Nasrallah is bluntly warning everybody that his previously dispossessed community should be dealt with differently, always citing its “honorable” past and hence its uprising power. In an attempt to 1 Retrieved from: http://www.10452lccc.com/hizbollah/nasrallah25.11.05.htm 1 prove this abovementioned “honor”, Nasrallah is always keen on emphasizing the role of the party, which he intentionally refers to as the Resistance, in preserving Lebanon. As it is known, the Shiite community has not played any significant political role in Lebanon’s history before the emergence of Imam Moussa al-Sadr in the 1970s. Neither in the formation of Greater Lebanon in 1920 nor in the establishment of the Maronite-Sunni National Pact of 1943 did the Shia have a say in determining the distribution of power in the sectarian country Lebanon although they were only given the position of the Speaker of Parliament which was insignificant at the time. Amidst the Maronite-Sunni dominance, the Shiite community in Lebanon ranked last among others in terms of education, social, political and economic standards which led to Sadr’s formation of the Movement of the Deprived [Harakat al-Mahroumin]. Today,Nasrallah takes pride that his people have liberated south Lebanon from the Israeli occupation in May 2000 and thus claims that no one is more devoted to safeguard the country’s sovereignty and freedom than his own people. One cannot but ask: what factors make Nasrallah adopt such a tone and why does he allow himself to consider his people superior to others? What changes have occurred in Lebanese politics to make him gain such confidence? Or, do these words only intend to keep his supporters’ morale high while matters differ when it comes to actions? Lebanon is a weak state which is not in full control of all its territory. Given the case, the “Party of God” [literal translation of the Arabic word “Hezbollah”] imposes itself as a predominant non-state actor which has established its own military power and welfare 2 system and has become a state-within-the-state. For instance, the Lebanese army cannot practice its
Recommended publications
  • The Monthly-Issue113-DECEMBER 2011 English
    PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS DRAFT LAW (2) COST OF LIVING INDEX LEBANON’S TELECOMMUNICATIONS December 2011 | SECTOR 113 THE MONTHLY INTERVIEWS iimonthly THE SPANISH AMBASSADOR TO www. .com # Published by Information International sal LEBANON JUAN CARLOS GAFO issue number THE STATE APPROPRIATES PRIVATE LAND AND SELLS ITS OWN Lebanon 5,000LL | Saudi Arabia 15SR | UAE 15DHR | Jordan 2JD| Syria 75SYP | Iraq 3,500IQD | Kuwait 1.5KD | Qatar 15QR | Bahrain 2BD | Oman 2OR | Yemen 15YRI | Egypt 10EP | Europe 5Euros INDEX 4 THE STATE APPROPRIATES PRIVATE LAND AND SELLS ITS OWN 7 PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS DRAFT LAW (2) 11 COST OF LIVING INDEX 12 CHARLES HELOU TERMINAL 15 LEBANON’S TELECOMMUNICATIONS SECTOR 17 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT BUILDING 18 MINISTRY OF INDUSTRY 20 CLERGY IMMUNITY Page 28 Page 7 21 BEIRUT MUNICIPALITY WORKERS UNION 23 SAINT GEORGE SCHOOL- ZALKA 25 THE DEMENTIAS BY DR. HANNA SAADAH 26 A PARABLE ABOUT HUMANITY BY DR. SAMAR ZEBIAN 27 WHERE COULD THE SECRET OF LIFE BE FOUND? Page 12 BY ANTOINE BOUTROS 28 THE MONTHLY INTERVIEWS: THE SPANISH AMBASSADOR TO LEBANON JUAN CARLOS 41 SYRIAN ACCUSATIONS AGAINST FUTURE GAFO MOVEMENT 30 ARMENIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH 42 OCTOBER 2011 TIMELINE 32 HOW DOES ONE BECOME AN ARMENIAN 46 SHURA COUNCIL ELECTIONS IN THE ORTHODOX CLERGYMAN? SULTANATE OF OMAN 33 SAFADI FOUNDATION 47 REAL ESTATE PRICES IN LEBANON - OCTOBER 2011 35 POPULAR CULTURE 48 FOOD PRICES - OCTOBER 2011 36 MYTH #52: SIMILARITY OR OPPOSITION 50 OLIVE OIL 37 MUST-READ BOOKS: SEXUAL ENCOUNTERS IN THE MIDDLE EAST 50 BEIRUT RAFIC HARIRI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT - OCTOBER 2011 38 MUST-READ CHILDREN’S BOOK: “ENJOYS PLAYING” 51 THE MONTHLY’S RECEPTION 39 LEBANON FAMILIES: HAYMOUR FAMILIES 40 DISCOVER LEBANON: JAJ 3 | EDITORIAL NOUHAD’S REMAINS OR LEBANON’S Nouhad Nasser Eddine was unaware that a terrible person begging employment fate was awaiting her on the dawn of October 15, and hospitalization of his/her 2011 on the “so called” Byblos-Beirut highway “Zai’m”.
    [Show full text]
  • American University of Beirut Hizballah
    AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF BEIRUT HIZBALLAH: THE SURVIVAL OF GROWTH by MARCUS BURKE HALLINAN A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts to the Department of Political Studies and Public Administration of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences at the American University of Beirut Beirut, Lebanon July 2016 AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF BEIRUT THESIS, DISSERTATION, PROJECT RELEASE FORM Student Name: Hallinan Marcus Burke Last First Middle Master’s Thesis Master’s Project Doctoral Dissertation I authorize the American University of Beirut to: (a) reproduce hard or electronic copies of my thesis, dissertation, or project; (b) include such copies in the archives and digital repositories of the University; and (c) make freely available such copies to third parties for research or educational purposes. I authorize the American University of Beirut, three years after the date of submitting my thesis, dissertation, or project, to: (a) reproduce hard or electronic copies of it; (b) include such copies in the archives and digital repositories of the University; and (c) make freely available such copies to third parties for research or educational purposes. __________________________________________________ Signature Date ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I first would like to thank my family, my mother, Kelly, father, Gerald, Jesse, Emily, Lola and Cali, who had been supportive of this life changing decision to attend the American University of Beirut in 2013. I could not have done it without you. Thank you and I love you. I would also like to thank Catherine Batruni for the countless proof readings of this paper, responding to my endless questions and for being a truly great friend.
    [Show full text]
  • View/Print Page As PDF
    MENU Policy Analysis / Articles & Op-Eds Hezbollah Finances: Funding the Party of God by Matthew Levitt Feb 13, 2005 ABOUT THE AUTHORS Matthew Levitt Matthew Levitt is the Fromer-Wexler Fellow and director of the Reinhard Program on Counterterrorism and Intelligence at The Washington Institute. Articles & Testimony atthew Levitt contributed this paper to the project "Terrorism Financing and State Responses in M Comparative Perspective," sponsored by the Center for Homeland Defense and Security at the Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California. This paper and others were published in March 2007 in Terrorism Financing and State Responses: a Comparative Perspective, edited by Jeanne Giraldo and Harold Trinkunas. Introduction It is a painful reality that no counterterrorism technique or effort, however extensive, international, or comprehensive, will put an end to terror attacks or uproot terrorism. There will always be people and groups with entrenched causes, an overwhelming sense of frustration, a self-justifying worldview, and a healthy dose of evil, who will resort to violence as a means of expression. The goal of counterterrorism, therefore, should be to constrict the environment so that it is increasingly difficult for terrorists to carry out their plots of destruction and death -- making it harder for terrorists to operate at every level, such as conducting operations, procuring and transferring false documents, ferrying fugitives from one place to another, and financing, laundering, and transferring funds. This includes cracking down not only on operational cells, but on their logistical and financial support networks as well. In fact, one can so constrict a terrorist group's operating environment that it will eventually suffocate.
    [Show full text]
  • A Hezbollah Foundation Intended to Inculcate Jihad and the Shaheed Culture Within Shiite Society in Lebanon
    רמה כ ז מל ו תשר מה ו ד י ע י ן למ( )מ" כרמ ז מה י עד מל ו ד י ע י ן ול רט ו ר רמה כ ז מל ו תשר מה ו ד י ע י ן ( למ מ" ) כרמ ז מה י עד מל ו ד י ע י ן ול רט ו ר רמה כ ז מל ו תשר מה ו ד י ע י ן ( למ מ" ) כרמ ז מה י עד מל ו ד י ע י ן ול רט ו ר רמה כ ז מל ו תשר מה ו ד י ע י ן ( למ מ" ) כרמ ז מה י עד מל ו ד י ע י ן ול רט ו ר The Association for the Revival of Resistance Legacy: A Hezbollah foundation intended to inculcate jihad and the shaheed culture within Shiite society in Lebanon March 12, 2020 Overview An important component in building the so-called resistance society is the inculcation of the values of jihad and shahada (heroic death for the sake of Allah) among the Shiite population in general and the younger generation in particular. An examination of Hezbollah’s civilian institutions revealed that they are also engaged in cultivating the shaheed culture, each in its own way and according to its field of specialization (education, culture, art, youth organizations, etc.). In addition, Hezbollah established a designated foundation named the Association for the Revival of Resistance Legacy, whose activity is dedicated to the promotion of shaheed culture. The Association for the Revival of Resistance Legacy (hereinafter: the association) is engaged in a wide variety of activities: publishing books on the lives of shaheeds; disseminating shaheeds’ wills and pictures and stories on their lives on social media; establishing museums; setting up monuments; promoting jihadi “tourism sites;” holding exhibitions and seminars; and operating a center dedicated to keeping shaheeds’ belongings and documenting their lives, in Beirut's southern suburb.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Hezbollah in Lebanon by Mohamad Ibrahim BA, Lebanese
    Survival through restrained institutionalization: The case of Hezbollah in Lebanon by Mohamad Ibrahim B.A., Lebanese American University, 2017 A THESIS submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF ARTS Department of Security Studies College of Arts and Sciences KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2019 Approved by: Major Professor Dr. Carla Martinez-Machain Copyright © Mohamad Ibrahim 2019. Abstract This thesis is an in-depth exploration of the evolving nature of domestic strategies adopted by Lebanon’s Hezbollah since its foundation in 1985 until the contemporary time. Based on Joel Migdal’s contributions to the literature on state-society relations, and Samuel Huntington’s understanding of institutionalization, it seeks to highlight and explain important transformations in Hezbollah’s political program, its sustained acquisition of arms, its social mobilization strategy, and its sensitive relationship with a de jure sovereign yet de facto weak Lebanese consociational system. The study proposes an explanation that combines Hezbollah’s ability to take advantage of the segmental autonomy that characterizes the power-sharing arrangements governing the Lebanese political system, and the overall existing political opportunity structure. The core argument is that Hezbollah has been able to become a powerful non-state actor through a process of restrained institutionalization which takes into consideration the need to sustain popular support on one hand, and the sensitive intricacies of Lebanon’s consociational system on the other hand. In other words, Hezbollah has invested its capacities in a way that maximizes its power in the existing political system, while remaining institutionally autonomous to a relative extent from it, and therefore becoming able to pursue its independent interests.
    [Show full text]
  • GREEN WITHOUT BORDERS the Operational Benefits of Hezbollah’S Environmental NGO
    THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY ■ MAY 2020 ■ PN79 PHOTO CREDIT: REUTERS Matthew Levitt Samantha Stern GREEN WITHOUT BORDERS The Operational Benefits of Hezbollah’s Environmental NGO On April 14, 2020, two incidents occurred along the Israel-Lebanon border, although only one garnered significant attention. In the widely covered event, peacekeepers from the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) broke up a “short standoff” between the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) and Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) in which the two sides pointed guns at each other. The intervention took place just south of the Blue Line marking the de facto international border, in the area between the Lebanese village of Adaisseh and the Israeli village of Misgav Am.1 In the second incident, four kilometers to the north, near the Lebanese village of Kfar Kila and the Israeli town of Metula, UNIFIL personnel trimmed back trees that were blocking security cameras’ line of vision along the border barrier. Four days earlier, Hezbollah media had published pictures of what it called an initiative by Green Without Borders (GWB), a Hezbollah-affiliated NGO, to plant dozens of trees obstructing “spy cameras” installed by the “Zionist enemy” on the border wall.2 UNIFIL acted only because the trees were planted on the Israeli side of the Blue Line, although this territory is claimed by Lebanon. © 2020 THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LEVITT AND STERN Recent provocations confirm that GWB is more Lebanon War.9 Jihad al-Binaa’s director-general, than an NGO; it is a Hezbollah front, providing Muhammad al-Hajj, attended the GWB inaugural the militant group cover for operational activities conference, billed “Southern Green Resistance,” and prohibited under UN Security Council Resolutions praised the new group for its planned contributions 1559 and 1701—from conducting preoperational to the overall resistance project.10 Al-Hajj and Nahle surveillance to firing rockets at Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • Contre-Insurrections
    Les thématiques du Thématique N° 21 – Novembre 2009 Stratégies et politiques de communication des belligérants non-étatiques Marc Hecker et Thomas Rid 1 Centre d’études en sciences sociales de la défense Thématique – No21 Stratégies et politiques de communication des belligérants non-étatiques Introduction La logique stratégique des belligérants non-étatiques Les principaux conflits actuels dans lesquels sont engagés des Etats occidentaux – du théâtre afghan à l‘Irak – sont souvent qualifiés d‘ « asymétriques ». Qu‘on les appelle « guérilla », « insurrection » ou « jihad », ils opposent au moins deux adversaires aux caractéristiques très différentes. D‘un côté, une armée occidentale moderne, formée et équipée principalement pour des affrontements militaires classiques. De l‘autre, un adversaire matériellement plus faible, disposant parfois uniquement de quelques dizaines d‘hommes armés de kalachnikovs et de RPG. Le paradoxe de la guerre asymétrique est que le « fort » ne gagne pas toujours. Les exemples historiques ne manquent pas, à l‘instar de la guerre d‘Algérie ou de l‘intervention américaine en Somalie en 1993. Pour comprendre la façon dont, dans une confrontation armée, le « faible » peut réussir à battre le « fort », il convient d‘analyser les mécanismes sous- tendant les affrontements asymétriques. Ceux-ci sont, schématiquement, de trois ordres. Le « faible » doit tout d‘abord prendre conscience de sa faiblesse. 2 Il lui faut ensuite en tirer les conséquences stratégiques et tactiques en développant une conception de la confrontation différente de celle des théoriciens de la guerre classique. Il doit enfin établir un rapport particulier avec la population afin de tenir jusqu‘à la victoire. Et qui dit rapport à la population sous-tend nécessité de communiquer avec elle.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction June 2018
    Hezbollah: An Introduction June 2018 Table of Contents Hezbollah’s Identity ...........................................................................................................................3 Wilayat al-Faqih and the 1985 Open Letter: Hezbollah’s Khomeinist Doctrine ......................................3 Military vs. Political Wing? .................................................................................................................4 Hezbollah in Service of Iran ................................................................................................................5 Iran’s Support for Hezbollah ...............................................................................................................6 Hezbollah’s “Resistance Economy” .....................................................................................................8 Hezbollah in Lebanon .........................................................................................................................8 Hezbollah’s “Foreign Policy” ............................................................................................................. 11 Hezbollah’s Future ........................................................................................................................... 12 2 Hezbollah’s Identity Lebanon-based Hezbollah is a transnational Shiite Islamist group founded by Iran in 1982, following the ideology of absolute Wilayat al-Faqih, as expounded by Tehran’s late Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ruhollah Musavi Khomeini.
    [Show full text]
  • Maquetación 1
    162. 2/2020 HEZBOLLAH AND THE LEBANESE POPULAR MOVEMENT Joseph Daher, School of Political and Social Sciences, Université de Lausanne Introduction Since its creation, Hezbollah’s resistance to Israel has given the party great popular legitimacy. However, the Party of God is today the target, like the whole of the Lebanese sectarian and neoliberal political class, of the anger of large segments of Lebanese society, as well as part of the Shi’a populations that constitute the heart of its popular base. For the first time, the protest movement, which is ongoing since its beginning in mid-October 2019, has massively affected regions with a Shi’a majority, in particular southern Lebanon and the city of Baalbeck in the Bekaa. In these regions, the Amal-Hezbollah duo was not spared by the demonstrators, who accused them of having prevented the socioeconomic development of their regions by imposing patronage and authoritarian policies. In the early days of the protest movement, the offices of Mohammad Raad, deputy and head of the Hezbollah-led “Fidelity to the Resistance” parliamentary bloc, and those of Hezbollah deputy Hassan Fadlallah, in the city of Nabatiyeh were attacked by the demonstrators. Some young people from the southern suburbs of Beirut, a bastion of the party’s popular base, joined the protest movement, while others on social media have not hesitated to criticise Hezbollah’s positioning against the protest movement. Although more modest than in the south, the demonstrations that took place in Baalbek were marked by a large participation of women, including schoolgirls. For the first time in the history of Hezbollah, voices, albeit limited and in an anonymous manner, among its fighters were heard criticising the positions of the party against the protest movement, while supporting the socioeconomic demands of protesters and denouncing the political allies of Hezbollah perceived as corrupt.
    [Show full text]
  • A Who's Who of the Insurgency In
    VOLUME VII, ISSUE 4 u MARCH 3, 2009 IN THIS ISSUE: A WHO’S WHO OF THE INSURGENCY IN PAKISTAN’S NORTH-WEST FRONTIER PROVINCE: PART TWO – FATA EXCLUDING NORTH AND SOUTH WAZIRISTAN By Rahimullah Yusufzai................................................................................1 ASSESSING THE ROLE OF HEZBOLLAH IN THE GAZA WAR AND ITS REGIONAL IMPACT By Benedetta Berti.......................................................................................4 Maulana Fazlullah THE RETURN OF SHARI’A LAW TO PAKISTAN’S SWAT REGION By Mukhtar A. Khan......................................................................................6 Terrorism Monitor is a publication of The Jamestown Foundation. INDIA’S HOME-GROWN JIHADI THREAT: A PROFILE OF THE INDIAN The Terrorism Monitor is MUJAHIDEEN designed to be read by policy- By Animesh Roul...........................................................................................9 makers and other specialists yet be accessible to the general public. The opinions expressed within are solely those of the A Who’s Who of the Insurgency in Pakistan’s authors and do not necessarily reflect those of The Jamestown North-West Frontier Province: Part Two – FATA Foundation. excluding North and South Waziristan Unauthorized reproduction or By Rahimullah Yusufzai redistribution of this or any Jamestown publication is strictly he Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) is the largest organization of Pakistani prohibited by law. militants operating in the country’s North-West Frontier Province T(NWFP), which includes the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA). Launched in a secret meeting on December 13, 2007, it is active in most of the 24 districts, seven tribal agencies and six frontier regions in the province. The militants’ strongholds are in South Waziristan, North Waziristan, Orakzai, Kurram, Khyber, Mohmand, Bajaur, and Darra Adamkhel tribal regions and in the settled districts of Swat, Upper Dir, Lower Dir, Bannu, Lakki Marwat, Tank, Peshawar, Dera Ismail Khan, Mardan, Charsadda, and Kohat.
    [Show full text]
  • The Post Syrian Civil War Image of Hezbollah: the Legitimization
    The Post Syrian Civil War image of Hezbollah: The legitimization struggle after 2011 Mariana Díaz García 2067617 Leiden University Supervisor: Dr. Marina Calculli Thesis for the M.A. Modern Middle Eastern Studies July, 2019 Index Introduction ............................................................................................................................3 Literature review ....................................................................................................................4 The role of ideological restructuration in achieving legitimacy..........................................................4 Restructuring Islamism as an ideology................................................................................................5 Political discourse as a tool for legitimacy…………………………………………………………11 Methodology .......................................................................................................................14 Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA)…………………………………………………………………15 Chapter overview .................................................................................................................18 1. Theoretical framework .....................................................................................................19 1.2 Hezbollah’s identity construction ................................................................................................20 1.1.2 Identity construction from 1985 to 2011...................................................................................21 1.1.3
    [Show full text]
  • Survival Hizbullah's Political Strategy
    This article was downloaded by: [Khatib, Lina] On: 5 April 2011 Access details: Access Details: [subscription number 935808908] Publisher Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37- 41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Survival Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713659919 Hizbullah's Political Strategy Lina Khatib Online publication date: 30 March 2011 To cite this Article Khatib, Lina(2011) 'Hizbullah's Political Strategy', Survival, 53: 2, 61 — 76 To link to this Article: DOI: 10.1080/00396338.2011.571011 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2011.571011 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.informaworld.com/terms-and-conditions-of-access.pdf This article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material. Hizbullah’s Political Strategy Lina Khatib The collapse of Lebanon’s national unity government under Prime Minister Saad Hariri on 12 January 2011, when more than a third of the cabinet resigned, was primarily orchestrated by Hizbullah (‘The Party of God’).
    [Show full text]