DOCSLIB.ORG

TEP Summary Report 3.26.14 Part 02

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TEP Summary Report 3.26.14 Part 02 PAGE 20 APPENDIX Notification Materials MUNI NEEDS YOUR INPUT! MUNI公車局需要您的意見 ! ¡MUNI NECESITA SUS OPINIONES! ATTEND UPCOMING MEETINGS ON PROPOSED SERVICE CHANGES Muni is considering proposed service and route changes as part of the Transit Effectiveness Project (TEP). Developed with extensive analysis and community input, 歡迎出席即將舉行的有關服務改變提議的會議 the TEP proposals will improve Muni for its 700,000 daily passengers. To provide input Muni 正考慮服務及路線改變提議來作為公共交通效率專案（TEP ）的一部分。公共交通效率專案（TEP ）的 提 議 是 基 於 全 面 or learn more, attend a community meeting. Visit www.TellMuni.com to give feedback 分析和社區意見而制定，其將改善 Muni 每日對 700,000 乘客的服務。想提出意見或了解更多，請參加一次社區會議。請上 L METRO PURPLE: 254C METR c50 m100 y0 k0 c100 m0 y85 k24 Web : 66 00 99 Web : 00 66 33 網站 www.TellMuni.com 給予反饋意見以及註冊獲得更新資訊。在 3月14日 ，三 藩 市 交 通 局（RGB : 102, 0, 153 SFMTARGB : 0, 102, 51 ）董 事 會 將 對 服 務 改 and sign up for updates. On March 14, the SFMTA Board will hold a public hearing on 10 12 22 27 33 變提議和收到的全部社區意見舉行一個公眾聽證會。 18 L L 17 28 28 36 43METRO PURPLE: 254C METR the proposed service changes and all community input received. c50 m100 y0 k0 c100 m0 y85 k24 Web : 66 00 99 Web : 00 66 33 L RGB : 102, 0, 153 RGB : 0, 102, 51 METRO PURPLE: 254C METR c50 m100 y0 k0 c100 m0 y85 k24 星期三，2月12日，晚上6點至8點 星期四，2月27日，晚上6點至8點 Web : 66 00 99 Web : 00 66 33 : : RGB : 102, 0, 153 RGB : 0, 102, 51 • • 10 12 22 27 33 10 12 22 27 33 警察局社區活動室， 10 警察局12 22 27 33 Richmond 461 6th Avenue Ingleside , 1 Sgt.L JohnL V Young Ln. • WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 12, 6-8PM: • THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 6-8PM: METRO PURPLE: 254C METR c50 m100 y0 k0 c100 m0 y85 k24 17 18 28 28 36 43Web : 66 00 99 Web : 00 66 33 L L L RGB : 102, 0, 153 RGB : 0, 102, 51 L 路線 28 28 32 38 路線 28 28 43 Richmond Police Station Community Room Ingleside Police17 18 28Station28 36 43 : : 10 12 22 27 33 10X 12 22 27 33 71 8 11 27 47L 76 10 12 22 27 33 L • 星期二，2月18日，晚上6點至8點6 : • 星期六，3月1日，下午1點至3點17 18 28 28 36 43L : 461 6th Ave. METRO PURPLE: 254C METR c50 m100 y0 k0 c100 m0 y85 k24 METRO PURPLE: 254C METR Web : 66 00 99 Web : 00 66 33 1 Sgt. John V Young Ln. c50 m100 y0 k0 c100 m0 y85 k24 RGB : 102, 0, 153 RGB : 0, 102, 51 Web : 66 00 99 Web : 00 66 33 RGB : 102, 0, 153 RGB : 0, 102, 51 28 28L 32 38L 28L 43 L L L 28 10 12L 22 27 33 Park圖書分館會議室, 1833 Page Street Telegraph10 12Hill22 社區活動中心,27 33 660 Lombard St. ROUTES: 28 28 32 38 ROUTES: 28 28 43 28 28 3510 4812 22 27 33 路線 6 71 路線 8X 11 27 47 76 L : L : L L 6 71 17X 18 28 28 36 43 L L 173 2818 2828 4328 36 43 • TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 18, 6-8PM: • SATURDAY,8 MARCH11 27 47 1, 761-3PM: 282 283 2832 2838 43 28 28L 43 L L 星期三，2月19日，晚上6點至8點28 28L 32 38L 星期一，3月3日，晚上6點至8點35 48 28 28L 32 38 • : • 10 12 22 27 33 : Park Branch28 Library28 Meeting Room, 1833 Page St. 103512 48 22 27 33 L 86X 1071 22 33 56 X 8 76 METRO PURPLE: 254C METR 11 27 47 c50 m100 y0 k0 c100 m0 y85 k24 Telegraph Hill NeighborhoodWeb : 66 00 99 Web : 00 66 33 Center RGB : 102, 0, 153 RGB : 0, 102, 51 Scottish Rite聖殿, 2850L 19th Ave. LGBT社區活動中心L ,1800 Market St. 62 713 28 28 43 3 28L 28 43 ROUTES: 6 71 L 10 12L 22L 27 33 28 28 43 2 3 28 28 43 283 2828 2843 43 28 28L 35 48 L L 660 Lombard St. 路線: 路線: 28 28L 32 38 X L 28 28 17X 18 28 28L 36 43 288 2810 22 33 56 8X 11 27 47 76 • WEDNESDAY,8X 10 FEBRUARY 22 33 56 19, 6-8PM: ROUTES: 8 11 27 47 76 L 2 3 28 28L 43 3 28 28L 43 METRO PURPLE: 254C METR L L c50 m100 y0 k0 c100 m0 y85 k24 • 星期六，2月22日，上午11點至下午1點 星期三，3月5日，晚上6點至8點 Web : 66 00 99 Web : 00 66 33 28 28 32 38 RGB : 102, 0, 153 RGB : 0, 102, 51 : • : 6 71 L 2 3 28 28L 43 Scottish Rite2 Temple,3 28 28 285043 19th Ave. 3510 12 48 22 27 33 小學 35 48 教堂 • MONDAY, MARCH 3, 6-8PM: Visitacion8X 10 Valley 22 33 56, 55 Schwerin St. Calvary Presbyterian , 2515 Fillmore St. 286 7128L ROUTES: X L L L X L 8 10 22 33 56 LGBT Community28173 2818 2843 Center2843 36 43 路線: 8 10 22 33 56 路線: 3 28 28 43 282 283L 28 28L 43 • SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 11AM-1PM: 1800 Market108X 1112St. 22 27 4727 3376 • 星期一，2月24日，晚上6點至8點: • 星期四，3月6日，晚上6點至8點: L 2X 3 28 28 43 8 10 22 33 56 L Mission 活動中心, 2450 HarrisonL St. 三藩市交通局（SFMTA）中庭，2樓 METRO PURPLE: 254C METR Visitacion Valley Elementary School, 55 Schwerin St. c50 m100 y0 k0 c100 m0 y85 k24 35 48 Web : 66 00 99 Web : 00 66 33 ROUTES: 28 28 43 RGB : 102, 0, 153 RGB : 0, 102, 51 X 路線 10 12 22 27 33 8 10 22 33 56 L : One South Van Ness Ave. ROUTES: 83X 281128 27 4347 76 • WEDNESDAY, MARCH 5, 6-8PM: L L 路線：全市會議 METRO PURPLE: 254C METR 17 18 28 28 36 43c50 m100 y0 k0 c100 m0 y85 k24 星期二，2月25日，晚上6點至8點Web : 66 00 99 Web : 00 66 33 • RGB : 102, 0, 153 RGB : 0, 102, 51 : • MONDAY, FEBRUARY 24, 6-8PM: Calvary Presbyterian35 48 Church, 2515 Fillmore St. 10 12 22 27 33 三藩市州立大學，10 12 22 27Seven33 Hills會議中心, 800 Font Blvd. • 星期六，3月8日，上午10點至中午: L Mission Rec Center, 2450 HarrisonL St. ROUTES: 3 28 28 43 L L METRO PURPLE: 254C METR METRO PURPLE: 254C METR c50 m100 y0 k0 c100 m0 y85 k24 c50 m100 y0 k0 c100 m0 y85 k24 Web : 66 00 99 Web : 00 66 33 路線 三藩市交通局（ ）中庭， 樓 17 18 28 28 36 43Web : 66 00 99 Web : 00 66 33 RGB : 102, 0, 153 RGB : 0, 102, 51 : RGB : 102, 0, 153 RGB : 0, 102, 51 SFMTA 2 ROUTES: 10 12 22 27 33 2810 2812L 4322 27 33 • THURSDAY, MARCH 6, 6-8PM: 10 12 22 27 33 One South Van Ness Ave. • 星期三，2月26日，晚上6點至8點X : 17 18 28 28L 36 43 178 1118 28 27 2847L 3676 43 路線：全市會議 • TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 6-8PM: SFMTA Atrium, 2nd Floor Bayanihan28 28社區活動中心L 43 , 1010 Mission St. 35 48 San Francisco10 12 State22 27 University,33 L Seven Hills One South Van Ness Ave. 路線: 10 12 22 27 33 METRO PURPLE: 254C METR X c50 m100 y0 k0 c100 m0 y85 k24 Web : 66 00 99 Web : 00 66 33 RGB : 102, 0, 153 RGB : 0, 102, 51 8 11 27 47 76 3 28 28L 43 Conference1028 Center,1228L 2243 27 80033 Font Blvd. ROUTES: CITYWIDE 28 28L 43 如需您所在區域或社區的會議資訊，請上網站35 48 www.sfmta.com/tepinput,致電 311 或 (415)701-2311，或電郵 tep@ ROUTES: 178X 1811 28 27 2847L 3676 43 • SATURDAY, MARCH 8, 10AM – NOON: 8X 11 27 47 76 sfmta.com3 。所有服務改變提議的資訊在所有會議上都有提供，並且可以在主要圖書館參考諮詢台查閱。28 28L 43 103512 48 22 27 33 L SFMTA Atrium, 2nd Floor 35 48 METRO PURPLE: 254C METR • WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 26,c50 m100 y0 k0 c100 m0 y85 k246-8PM: Web : 66 00 99 Web : 00 66 33 RGB : 102, 0, 153 RGB : 0, 102, 51 聯繫人：Sean Kennedy，公 共 交 通 效 率 專 案（ TEP）規劃經理，(415) 701-4599，電 郵 [email protected] 12L Bayanihan28103 Community2828 432822L 4327 33 Center One South Van Ness Ave. 3 28 28L 43 1010 Mission817X 11 18St. 2728 4728L 7636 43 ROUTES: CITYWIDE ASISTA A LAS PRÓXIMAS REUNIONES SOBRE LAS PROPUESTAS DE CAMBIOS ROUTES: 3510 4812 22 27 33 283 28L 2843L 43 EN EL SERVICIO Muni está considerando propuestas de cambios en el servicio y las rutas como parte del Proyecto de Efectividad 8X 11 27 47 76 del Transporte (TEP). Desarrolladas con un extenso análisis y comentarios de la comunidad, las propuestas de 35 48 TEP mejorarán el Muni para sus 700,000 pasajeros diarios. Para dar su opinión u obtener más información, asista 3 28 28L 43 a una reunión comunitaria. Visite www.tellmuni.com para dar su opinión y registrarse para recibir actualizaciones. El 14 de marzo, el Consejo de SFMTA llevará a cabo una audiencia pública sobre las propuestas de cambios en el L METRO PURPLE: 254C METR c50 m100 y0 k0 c100 m0 y85 k24 Web : 66 00 99 Web : 00 66 33 servicio y todos los comentarios recibidos de la comunidad. RGB : 102, 0, 153 RGB : 0, 102, 51 10 12 22 27 33 • MIÉRCOLES, 12 DE FEBRERO, 6-8PM: • JUEVES, 1727 DE18 FEBRERO,28 28L 36 436-8PM: TellMuni.com Richmond Police Station Community Room Ingleside Police Station L METRO PURPLE: 254C METR c50 m100 y0 k0 c100 m0 y85 k24 Web : 66 00 99 Web : 00 66 33 10 12 22 27 33 RGB : 102, 0, 153 RGB : 0, 102, 51 461 6th Avenue 1 Sgt. John10 V12 Young22 27 Ln.33 For information on meetings in your district or neighborhood, visit sfmta.com/tepinput, 28 28L 32 38L 28 28L 43 RUTAS: RUTAS: 17 18 28 28L 36 43 call (415) 701-4599, or email [email protected].
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fy20 Strategic Plan
    FAIRFIELD AND SUISUN TRANSIT FY20 STRATEGIC PLAN FOUNDATION MISSION VISION At FAST, we strive to: To provide a safe and efficient transportation service for our community with . Provide sustainable and innovative service. a high standard of quality. Have a positive impact on our community and environment. Deliver convenient service so people will ride with us. PRINCIPLES STEWARDSHIP SERVICE RELATIONS POSITIVE OUTCOMES We will appropriately manage taxpayer We will provide our community with the We will work as a team to foster positive We will proactively seek innovative resources: time, money, people, and facilities highest quality service by focusing on safety, relations with each other, our customers, our improvements that result in positive and to serve the community and improve our convenience, reliability, and sustainability. community, and our stakeholders. sustainable outcomes. environment. VALUES COMMUNITY/ FACILITIES FINANCES FLEET OPERATIONS SAFETY SYSTEMS CUSTOMERS EMPLOYEES GOALS • Conduct annual FAST • Hire Transportation • Partner with City • Seek and assist with applying • Work with outside consultant • Conduct a Request for • Reduce preventable • Award contract and Customer Satisfaction Survey Manager, Transit engineering staff to continue for funding opportunities for and PG&E to develop an Proposal (RFP) for Transit accident rate to meet implement an updated to monitor performance Operations Manager, engineering, design, and fleet replacement, Fairfield- effective Fleet Ready Plan Operations Services and contract safety standards. transit data management goals and evaluate service Public Works Assistant, construction efforts on the Vacaville Train Station: Phase for the Corporation Yard. award contract. • Use DriveCam to system. quality. and Office Specialist following key projects: II construction (additional • Solicit bids/award contract • Complete a RFP identifying continually improve safety.
    [Show full text]
  • Oore Ventura County Transportation Commission
    javascript:void(0) Final Audit Report June 2017 Ventura County Transportation Commission TDA Triennial Performance Audit City of Ojai oore City of Ojai Triennial Performance Audit, FY 2014-2016 Final Report Table of Contents Chapter 1: Executive Summary ........................................................ 01 Chapter 2: Review Scope and Methodology ..................................... 05 Chapter 3: Program Compliance ...................................................... 09 Chapter 4: Performance Analysis ..................................................... 15 Chapter 5: Functional Review .......................................................... 23 Chapter 6: Findings and Recommendations ..................................... 29 Moore & Associates, Inc. | 2017 City of Ojai Triennial Performance Audit, FY 2014-2016 Final Report This page intentionally blank. Moore & Associates, Inc. | 2017 City of Ojai Triennial Performance Audit, FY 2014-2016 Final Report Chapter 1 Executive Summary In 2017, the Ventura County Transportation Commission (VCTC) selected the consulting team of Moore & Associates, Inc./Ma and Associates to prepare Triennial Performance Audits of itself as the RTPA, and the nine transit operators to which it allocates funding. As one of the six statutorily designated County Transportation Commissions in the SCAG region, VCTC also functions as the respective county RTPA. The California Public Utilities Code requires all recipients of Transit Development Act (TDA) Article 4 funding to complete an independent audit on a three-year cycle in order to maintain funding eligibility. This is the first Triennial Performance Audit of the City of Ojai. The Triennial Performance Audit (TPA) of the City of Ojai’s public transit program covers the three-year period ending June 30, 2016. The Triennial Performance Audit is designed to be an independent and objective evaluation of the City of Ojai as a public transit operator, providing operator management with information on the economy, efficiency, and effectiveness of its programs across the prior three years.
    [Show full text]
  • Purpose and Need Statement
    Purpose and Need Statement South Halsted Bus Corridor Enhancement Project November 2018 Prepared for: Prepared by: g PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK d PURPOSE AND NEED STATEMENT Table of Contents Introduction 2 PURPOSE AND NEED STATEMENT Introduction The South Halsted Bus Corridor Enhancement Project was initiated by the Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) in partnership with Pace Suburban Bus to improve transit along approximately 11 miles of South Halsted Street, from the Pace Harvey Transportation Center to 79th Street. The corridor also includes segments of 79th and 95th Streets that provide connections to the CTA Red Line 79th and 95th Street Stations. For study purposes, the project area includes a half mile catchment area around the corridor as shown in Figure 1.1. The Purpose and Need Statement provides a foundation and justification for the project and is required for all projects going through the federal National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process.1 The South Halsted Bus Corridor serves the communities of Harvey, Phoenix, Dixmoor, Riverdale, Calumet Park, and the City of Chicago neighborhoods of West Pullman, Morgan Park, Roseland, Washington Heights, and Auburn Gresham. The project corridor aligns or intersects with multiple east-west and north-south arterial roadways, CTA and Pace bus routes, CTA and Metra rail stations, and shared-use paths. Transit improvements would complement CTA’s planned extension of the Red Line from 95th Street to 130th Street, as the preferred alignment is located a half mile or more from the Halsted Corridor. The Red Line Extension is currently undergoing the federal environmental review and planning process. The corridor is populated with mainly commercial businesses, surrounded by residential communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Moving Forward 2050 Transit Projects (Draft)
    MOVING FORWARD 2050 PROJECT LIST - TRANSIT (DRAFT 3-27-20) Plan ID Project Sponsor Project Name Description Location Category Project Year Cost ($M) Known Funds ($M) Fund Source 4510 Petaluma Transit Bus Replacements (transitioning toward zero emissions fleet by 2029)Routine replacement of Petaluma Transit and Petaluma ParatransitPetaluma revenue vehicle fleet, followingTransit FTA Capital useful life Projects cycles and via MTC's TCP2020-2050 process $ 16.6 16.6 MTC FTA 5307, 5339, and TDA funds TR0006 Petaluma Transit Fare Free Program Discounted or fare-free programs system-wide or for specific groups,Petaluma, such CAas K-12, seniors, low-income,Transit Improvementsweekend pilot, -summer Non Capital pilot, or paratransit2022 riders. $ 14.0 0 Unknown 4523 Petaluma Transit Fleet Expansion Fleet expansion for fixed route and paratransit service in order toPetaluma offer more service and meet growingTransit demand. Capital Projects 2020-2050 $ 5.0 0 Unknown 4539 Petaluma Transit Ongoing Bus Stop Improvements Addition of shelters, benches, trash cans, real-time informationPetaluma displays, concrete accessibility Transitpads, solar Capital security Projects lighting, maps, infoposts,2021 etc. at various $existing 10.1bus stops in Petaluma. 0.025 TDA 4515 Petaluma Transit Petaluma Transit - Ongoing Operations Operating costs for Petaluma Transit and Petaluma Paratransit,Petaluma based upon September 2019 serviceTransit levels Improvements and costs. - Non Capital 2020-2050 $ 84.0 84 TDA, Measure M, STA, Misc. Grants 4516 Petaluma Transit Service expansion Service expansion including increased service and span on majorPetaluma routes & arterials, additional weekendTransit Improvements and holiday service, - Non Capital additional west2020-2050 side and school $tripper service, 56.1 Phase I BRT implementation0 Unknown on E.
    [Show full text]
  • City Commission
    City of Miami City Hall 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, FL 33133 www.miamigov.com Meeting Minutes Thursday, May 14, 2015 9:00 AM REGULAR City Hall Commission Chambers City Commission Tomás Regalado, Mayor Wifredo (Willy) Gort, Chair Keon Hardemon, Vice Chair Marc David Sarnoff, Commissioner District Two Frank Carollo, Commissioner District Three Francis Suarez, Commissioner District Four Daniel J. Alfonso, City Manager Victoria Méndez, City Attorney Todd B. Hannon, City Clerk City Commission Meeting Minutes May 14, 2015 CONTENTS PR - PRESENTATIONS AND PROCLAMATIONS AM - APPROVING MINUTES MV - MAYORAL VETOES CA - CONSENT AGENDA PH - PUBLIC HEARINGS SR - SECOND READING ORDINANCES FR - FIRST READING ORDINANCES RE - RESOLUTIONS BC - BOARDS AND COMMITTEES DI - DISCUSSION ITEMS PART B PZ - PLANNING AND ZONING ITEM (S) MAYOR AND COMMISSIONERS' ITEMS M - MAYOR'S ITEMS D1 - DISTRICT 1 ITEMS D2 - DISTRICT 2 ITEMS D3 - DISTRICT 3 ITEMS D4 - DISTRICT 4 ITEMS D5 - DISTRICT 5 ITEMS City of Miami Page 2 Printed on 6/8/2015 City Commission Meeting Minutes May 14, 2015 9:00 A.M. INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Present: Chair Gort, Commissioner Sarnoff, Commissioner Carollo, Commissioner Suarez and Vice Chair Hardemon On the 14th day of May 2015, the City Commission of the City of Miami, Florida, met at its regular meeting place in City Hall, 3500 Pan American Drive, Miami, Florida, in regular session. The Commission Meeting was called to order by Chair Gort at 9:04 a.m., recessed at 12:16 p.m., reconvened at 3:44 p.m., and adjourned at 8:14 p.m. Note for the Record: Commissioner Sarnoff entered the Commission chamber at 9:05 a.m., Vice Chair Hardemon entered the Commission chamber at 9:07 a.m., Commissioner Suarez entered the Commission chamber at 9:13 a.m., and Commissioner Carollo entered the Commission chamber at 9:38 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Senior Transportation Resource & Information Guide
    4th Edition, September 2018 Senior Transportation Resource & Information Guide Transportation Resources, Information, Planning & Partnership for Seniors (617) 730-2644 [email protected] www.trippsmass.org Senior Transportation Resource & Information Guide TableThis guide of Contents is published by TRIPPS: Transportation Resources, TypeInformation, chapter Planning title (level & Partnership 1) ................................ for Seniors. This................................ program is funded 1 in part by a Section 5310 grant from MassDOT. TRIPPS is a joint venture of theType Newton chapter & Brookline title (level Councils 2) ................................ on Aging and BrooklineCAN,................................ in 2 conjunction with the Brookline Age-Friendly Community Initiative. Type chapter title (level 3) .............................................................. 3 Type chapter title (level 1) ................................................................ 4 Type chapter title (level 2) ................................ ................................ 5 TheType information chapter in title this (levelguide has3) ................................ been thoroughly researched............................... compiled, 6 publicized, and “road tested” by our brilliant volunteers, including Marilyn MacNab, Lucia Oliveira, Ann Latson, Barbara Kean, Ellen Dilibero, Jane Gould, Jasper Weinberg, John Morrison, Kartik Jayachondran, Mary McShane, Monique Richardson, Nancy White, Phyllis Bram, Ruth Brenner, Ruth Geller, Shirley Selhub,
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the G Line
    Review of the G Line ,. July 10, 2013 NYC Transit G Line Review Executive Summary Executive Summary The attached report provides a comprehensive review of operations on the G line. Based on NYC Transit’s standard measures of On-Time Performance and Wait Assessment, the G performs well relative to the average subway line. At the same time, the G differs from other NYC Transit subway lines because the route is relatively short and never enters Manhattan, and thus serves primarily as a feeder/distributor with most riders transferring at least once before reaching their destinations. This review identifies a number of opportunities to improve operations on the G line, with recommendations chiefly intended to provide more even train headways and passenger loading, as well as to improve customer communication. Key Findings: While G ridership has grown significantly in recent years, it still remains relatively low compared to the rest of the system, and average passenger loads on the G are within service guidelines during both peak and off-peak hours. Scheduling the G train around the busier and more frequent F train causes uneven headways and passenger loads on the G, most significantly during the afternoon peak period, when G service is scheduled at the minimum guideline frequency of 6 trains per hour (an average 10-minute headway). G riders make twice as many transfers as the average subway rider; this high transfer rate is inconvenient for customers who must wait for multiple trains. Trains shorter than the platform length cause uncertainty about where the G train stops, contributing to uneven passenger loads.
    [Show full text]
  • Light Rail and Streetcar Systems, Highlighting What Sets Them Apart and Where the Differences Become Fuzzy
    Light Rail & Streetcar Systems How They Differ; How They OverlapOverlap The American Public Transportation Association is the leading force in advancing public transportation. APTA is a nonprofit international association of 1,500 public and private member organizations. Its public organizations are engaged in the areas of bus, paratransit, light rail, commuter rail, subways, waterborne passenger services, and high-speed rail. Members also include large and small companies that plan, design, construct, finance, supply, and operate bus and rail services worldwide. Government agencies, metropolitan planning organizations, state departments of transportation, academic institutions, and trade publications are also part of its membership. To strengthen and improve public transportation, APTA serves and leads its diverse membership through advocacy, innovation and information sharing. APTA and its members and staff work to ensure that public transportation is available and accessible for all Americans in communities across the country. This publication is a joint effort of APTA’s Light Rail Technical Forum and Streetcar Subcommittee. October 2014 Purpose This brochure provides an easy-to-use guide that explains the typical characteristics of light rail and streetcar systems, highlighting what sets them apart and where the differences become fuzzy. This is intended to be a useful tool for civic leaders and the general public as new transportation initiatives are being proposed in their communities, and for practitioners as they strive to explain these initiatives in broadly understandable terms. 1 Background cost, with carrying capacities between the practical upper limits of buses and the much higher numbers A century ago, cities throughout North required to justify building new rapid America were laced with electric transit systems.
    [Show full text]
  • GREEN-FALL-BROCHURE-2019.Pdf
    PV Transit has nine routes covering major Have Your Fare Ready Voice Response destinations inin Palos Verdes Estates, Rolling Before boarding the bus have your fare ready. The Call (310) 974-8473 Hills Estates and Rancho Palos Verde. A bus Hills Estates and Rancho Palos Verde. A bus regular PVPV TransitTransit fare fare is is$2.50 $2.50 and and $1.00 $1.00 for seniorfor senior and •• InputInput thethe busbus stopstop numbernumber listedlisted inin eacheach routeroute system map and individualindividual bus schedules disabledand disabled passengers. passengers. If you want If toyou transfer want to to another transfer PV schedule (see below) and at www.nextbus.com un- that include bus arrival/departure times are toTransit another route, PV ask Transit the driver route, for aask free the transfer. driver Transfers for a free to derunder “Palos “Palos Verdes Verdes Transit.” Transit.” that include bus arrival/departure times transfer.Metro, Torrance Transfers and to Beach Metro, Cities Torrance Transit and are Beach 25 cents. Cities PV • Next Bus automated voice system will indicate when available online at palosverdes.com/pvtransit. • Next Bus automated voice system will indicate when are available online at palosverdes.com/ Transit acceptsare 25 cents. Inter Agency PV Transit Transfers accepts (Paper Inter and Agency TAP) the next bus is scheduled to arrive. pvtransit.Individual Individualbus schedules bus schedulesare also availableare also Transfersand Metro (PaperEZ Pass and (adult TAP) and and senior Metro & disabled).EZ Pass (adultIf you at PV Transit administrative offices, 38 Crest andtransfer senior using & disabled).a stored value If you TAP transfer card you using will a have stored to Text Response (Data usage fees may apply) available at PV Transit administrative offices, Road West, Rolling Hills, CA, 90274.
    [Show full text]
  • Support Material Agenda Item No. 6
    Support Material Agenda Item No. 6 Transit Committee Meeting March 12, 2020 9:00 AM Location: San Bernardino County Transportation Authority First Floor Lobby Board Room Santa Fe Depot, 1170 W. 3rd Street San Bernardino, CA 92410 DISCUSSION ITEMS Transit 6. San Bernardino County Transportation Authority and Omnitrans Consolidation Study and Innovative Transit Review of the Metro-Valley That the Transit Committee recommend the Board, acting as the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority: A. Receive and file an update on the Consolidation Study and Innovative Transit Review of the Metro-Valley. B. Approve a Budget Amendment to the Fiscal Year 2019/2020 budget to transfer State Transit Assistance Rail funds from Task No. 0309 - Transit Operator Support to Task No. 0425 - Special Projects and Strategic Initiatives, in the amount of $400,000. Attached you will find Task 1.3: Performance Review Report and Task 1.2: Agency Functional Assessment Report, provided separately for your review. SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY CONSOLIDATION STUDY AND INNOVATIVE TRANSIT REVIEW TASK 1.3: PERFORMANCE REVIEW FINAL – February 25, 2020 WSP USA 862 E. HOSPITALITY LANE, SUITE 350 SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92408 TEL.: +1 909-888-1106 WSP.COM Page Intentionally Left Blank San Bernardino County Transportation Authority Consolidation Study and Innovative Transit Review Task 1.3 — Performance Review February 25, 2020 Prepared for: SBCTA Prepared by: WSP USA QUALITY CONTROL Name Date (M/D/Y) Preparation Tom L./ Luke Y. 01/11/2020 Technical Review Billy H. 01/13/2020 Quality Review Billy H. 01/13/2020 Backcheck & Revision Tom L./ Luke Y. 01/13/2020 Approval for Release Billy H.
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco Transit Effectiveness Project
    A partnership between the San Francisco Controller’s Office and the Municipal Transportation Agency, which oversees Muni. San Francisco Transit Effectiveness Project BRIEFING BOOK Nelson Nygaard DPOTVMUJOHBTTPDJBUFT JULY 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF FIGURES Introduction to the TEP ........................................... 1-1 Figure.1-1. Stakeholder.Input.Structure........................ 1-2. Introduction................................................................ 1-1 Figure.1-2. Muni.Transit.Vehicles.and.Lines................. 1-4 TEP.Goals.................................................................. 1-1 Figure.1-3.. Schematic.Diagram.of.Current.. Major.Tasks................................................................. 1-2 . Muni.Service.Network................................ 1-4 Who.is.Involved.......................................................... 1-2 Figure.5-1. Peer.Comparison:..Transit.Agency. Schedule...................................................................... 1-3 . (including.bus.and.rail).............................. 5-3 About.this.Briefing.Book............................................. 1-3 Figure.5-2. Percent.of.Passenger.Trips.Carried. Muni.System.Overview............................................... 1-4 . by.Each.Mode............................................ 5-5 Figure.5-3. Cost.Effectiveness.(Cost.per.passenger.trip)..5-6 Key Issues for the TEP ............................................. 2-2 Figure.5-4.. Average.System.Operating.Speed................ 5-8 Introduction...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Joint International Light Rail Conference
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH Number E-C145 July 2010 Joint International Light Rail Conference Growth and Renewal April 19–21, 2009 Los Angeles, California Cosponsored by Transportation Research Board American Public Transportation Association TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2010 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OFFICERS Chair: Michael R. Morris, Director of Transportation, North Central Texas Council of Governments, Arlington Vice Chair: Neil J. Pedersen, Administrator, Maryland State Highway Administration, Baltimore Division Chair for NRC Oversight: C. Michael Walton, Ernest H. Cockrell Centennial Chair in Engineering, University of Texas, Austin Executive Director: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2010–2011 TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES COUNCIL Chair: Robert C. Johns, Associate Administrator and Director, Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, Cambridge, Massachusetts Technical Activities Director: Mark R. Norman, Transportation Research Board Jeannie G. Beckett, Director of Operations, Port of Tacoma, Washington, Marine Group Chair Cindy J. Burbank, National Planning and Environment Practice Leader, PB, Washington, D.C., Policy and Organization Group Chair Ronald R. Knipling, Principal, safetyforthelonghaul.com, Arlington, Virginia, System Users Group Chair Edward V. A. Kussy, Partner, Nossaman, LLP, Washington, D.C., Legal Resources Group Chair Peter B. Mandle, Director, Jacobs Consultancy, Inc., Burlingame, California, Aviation Group Chair Mary Lou Ralls, Principal, Ralls Newman, LLC, Austin, Texas, Design and Construction Group Chair Daniel L. Roth, Managing Director, Ernst & Young Orenda Corporate Finance, Inc., Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Rail Group Chair Steven Silkunas, Director of Business Development, Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Public Transportation Group Chair Peter F. Swan, Assistant Professor of Logistics and Operations Management, Pennsylvania State, Harrisburg, Middletown, Pennsylvania, Freight Systems Group Chair Katherine F.
    [Show full text]