DOCSLIB.ORG

San Francisco Ethics Commission Disclosure Report for Permit

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
San Francisco Ethics Commission Disclosure Report for Permit DocuSign Envelope ID: 8F814BB1-5561-42A3-BCF2-D64F556412CD San Francisco Ethics Commission 25 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 220, San Francisco, CA 94102 Received on: Phone: 415.252.3100 . Fax: 415.252.3112 04-10-2019\DateSigned | 10:39:18\ PDT [email protected] . www.sfethics.org \DateSigned\ Disclosure Report for Permit Consultants SFEC Form 3410B (S.F. Campaign and Governmental Conduct Code § 3.400A et seq.) A Public Document 1. FILING INFORMATION TYPE OF FILING DATE OF ORIGINAL FILING (for amendment only) \OriginalFilingType\ \OriginalFilingDate\ PERIOD COVERED \PeriodMonths\ \PeriodYear\ January 1 to March 31 2019 2. PERMIT CONSULTANT AND EMPLOYER INFORMATION NAME OF PERMIT CONSULTANT NAME OF EMPLOYER Kyle Thompson \PermitConsultantName\ A.R.\PermitConsultantEmployer Sanchez-Corea & \Associates, Inc. BUSINESS ADDRESS 301 Junipero Serra Blvd., Suite 270, San Francisco, CA 94127 \PermitConsultantAddress\ BUSINESS TELEPHONE BUSINESS EMAIL ADDRESS 415-333-8080 [email protected] \PermitConsultantTelephone\ \PermitConsultantEmail\ 3. CLIENT INFORMATION Enter the name, business address, contact person (if applicable), e-mail address, and business telephone number of each client for whom you performed permit consulting services during the reporting period. Also enter the amount of compensation you or your employer received or expected to receive from each client for permit consulting services during the reporting period. # CLIENT INFORMATION NAME OF CLIENT One De Haro, LLC c/o SKS Investments \ClientName1\ BUSINESS ADDRESS OF CLIENT 601 California Street, Suite 1310, San Francisco, CA 94108 \ClientAddress1\ 1 EMAIL ADDRESS OF CLIENT BUSINESS TELEPHONE OF CLIENT [email protected] 415-421-8200 \ClientEmail1\ \ClientTelephone1\ AMOUNT OF COMPENSATION CLIENT CONTACT PERSON 325 John Fisher $ \ClientCompensation1\ \ClientContactPerson1\ SAN FRANCISCO ETHICS COMMISSION 1 DocuSign Envelope ID: 8F814BB1-5561-42A3-BCF2-D64F556412CD NAME OF CLIENT KR 100 Hooper, LLC \ClientName2\ BUSINESS ADDRESS OF CLIENT 100 First Street, San Francisco, CA 94105 \ClientAddress2\ 2 EMAIL ADDRESS OF CLIENT BUSINESS TELEPHONE OF CLIENT [email protected] 415-778-7747 \ClientEmail2\ \ClientTelephone2\ AMOUNT OF COMPENSATION CLIENT CONTACT PERSON 295 Nate Marshall $ \ClientCompensation2\ \ClientContactPerson2\ NAME OF CLIENT Huntsman Architectural Group \ClientName3\ BUSINESS ADDRESS OF CLIENT 50 California Street, 7th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94111 \ClientAddress3\ 3 EMAIL ADDRESS OF CLIENT BUSINESS TELEPHONE OF CLIENT [email protected] 415-394-1212 \ClientEmail3\ \ClientTelephone3\ AMOUNT OF COMPENSATION CLIENT CONTACT PERSON 350 Joanna Heringer $ \ClientCompensation3\ \ClientContactPerson3\ NAME OF CLIENT Distinguished Vineyards \ClientName4\ BUSINESS ADDRESS OF CLIENT 900 Larkspur Landing Circle, Suite 120, Larkspur, CA 94939 \ClientAddress4\ 4 EMAIL ADDRESS OF CLIENT BUSINESS TELEPHONE OF CLIENT [email protected] 646-299-7681 \ClientEmail4\ \ClientTelephone4\ AMOUNT OF COMPENSATION CLIENT CONTACT PERSON 350 Luke Higgins $ \ClientCompensation4\ \ClientContactPerson4\ ADDITIONAL SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS REQUIRED Attach additional sheets to this statement to disclose ☐X additional clients. \AdditionalClientSheets\ SAN FRANCISCO ETHICS COMMISSION 2 DocuSign Envelope ID: 8F814BB1-5561-42A3-BCF2-D64F556412CD 4. CONTACTS WITH CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES Describe each permit sought or obtained for a client (include the application number for the permit) during the reporting period and identify the client for whom you sought or obtained that permit. Also, provide the name each officer or employee of the Department of Building Inspection, the Entertainment Commission, the Planning Department, or the Department of Public Works you contacted in attempting to obtain the permit during the reporting period. # PERMIT INFORMATION PERMIT APPLICATION NUMBER CLIENT REPRESENTED 17IE-1060 One De Haro, LLC c/o SKS Investments \PermitNumber1\ \PermitClient1\ # OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE CONTACTED DEPARTMENT A Andy\OfficerEmployee1A Zhou \ DPW\Department1A\ B Marion\OfficerEmployee1B Meyer \ DPW\Department1B\ 1 C Vanessa\OfficerEmployee1C Duran \ DPW\Department1C\ D \OfficerEmployee1D\ \Department1D\ E \OfficerEmployee1E\ \Department1E\ PERMIT APPLICATION NUMBER CLIENT REPRESENTED 19MSE-00148 One De Haro, LLC c/o SKS Investments \PermitNumber2\ \PermitClient2\ # OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE CONTACTED DEPARTMENT A Andy\OfficerEmployee2A Zhou \ DPW\Department2A\ B Janalee\OfficerEmployee2B Gonzaga\ DPW\Department2B\ 2 C \OfficerEmployee2C\ \Department2C\ D \OfficerEmployee2D\ \Department2D\ E \OfficerEmployee2E\ \Department2E\ SAN FRANCISCO ETHICS COMMISSION 3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 8F814BB1-5561-42A3-BCF2-D64F556412CD # PERMIT INFORMATION PERMIT APPLICATION NUMBER CLIENT REPRESENTED 2017.10.12.1125 S One De Haro, LLC c/o SKS Investments \PermitNumber3\ \PermitClient3\ # OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE CONTACTED DEPARTMENT A Amaris\OfficerEmployee3A Chan \ DBI\Department3A\ B Dan\OfficerEmployee3B Lowrey \ DBI\Department3B\ 3 C Michelle\OfficerEmployee3C Yu \ DBI\Department3C\ D Andy\OfficerEmployee3D Zhou \ DPW\Department3D\ E Marion\OfficerEmployee3E Meyer \ DPW\Department3E\ PERMIT APPLICATION NUMBER CLIENT REPRESENTED 2017.10.12.1125 S One De Haro, LLC c/o SKS Investments \PermitNumber4\ \PermitClient4\ # OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE CONTACTED DEPARTMENT A Vanessa\OfficerEmployee4A Duran \ DPW\Department4A\ B \OfficerEmployee4B\ \Department4B\ 4 C \OfficerEmployee4C\ \Department4C\ D \OfficerEmployee4D\ \Department4D\ E \OfficerEmployee4E\ \Department4E\ ADDITIONAL SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS REQUIRED Attach additional sheets to this statement to disclose X ☐ additional permits. \AdditionalPermitSheets\ SAN FRANCISCO ETHICS COMMISSION 4 DocuSign Envelope ID: 8F814BB1-5561-42A3-BCF2-D64F556412CD 5. POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS Enter the information below for each political contribution of $100 or more made by the permit consultant or the permit consultant’s employer during the reporting period to: • an elected official of the City and County, • a candidate for such office, • a committee controlled by such officer or candidate, • a committee primarily formed to support or oppose such officer or candidate, or • any committee primarily formed to support or oppose a ballot measure to be voted on only in San Francisco. # NAME OF OFFICER, CANDIDATE, OR DATE OF CONTRIBUTION AMOUNT OF CONTRIBUTIONS COMMITTEE 1 \PCOfficerCandidateCommittee1\ \DateOfContribution1\ $ \AmountOfContribution1\ 2 \PCOfficerCandidateCommittee2\ \DateOfContribution2\ $ \AmountOfContribution2\ 3 \PCOfficerCandidateCommittee3\ \DateOfContribution3\ $ \AmountOfContribution3\ 4 \PCOfficerCandidateCommittee4\ \DateOfContribution4\ $ \AmountOfContribution4\ 5 \PCOfficerCandidateCommittee5\ \DateOfContribution5\ $ \AmountOfContribution5\ 6 \PCOfficerCandidateCommittee6\ \DateOfContribution6\ $ \AmountOfContribution6\ 7 \PCOfficerCandidateCommittee7\ \DateOfContribution7\ $ \AmountOfContribution7\ 8 \PCOfficerCandidateCommittee8\ \DateOfContribution8\ $ \AmountOfContribution8\ 9 \PCOfficerCandidateCommittee9\ \DateOfContribution9\ $ \AmountOfContribution9\ 10 \PCOfficerCandidateCommittee10\ \DateOfContribution10\ $ \AmountOfContribution10\ ADDITIONAL SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS REQUIRED Attach additional sheets to this statement to disclose ☐ additional contributions. \AdditionalContributionSheets\ SAN FRANCISCO ETHICS COMMISSION 5 DocuSign Envelope ID: 8F814BB1-5561-42A3-BCF2-D64F556412CD 6. VERIFICATION I have used all reasonable diligence in preparing this statement. I have reviewed this statement and to the best of my knowledge the information I have provided here is true and complete. I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. NAME AND SIGNATURE OF PERSON FILING REPORT DATE SIGNED \Signature\ Kyle Thompson 04-10-2019 | 10:39:18 PDT \SignerName\ \DateSigned\ SAN FRANCISCO ETHICS COMMISSION 6 DocuSign Envelope ID: 8F814BB1-5561-42A3-BCF2-D64F556412CD Quarterly Report for Permit Consultants San Francisco Ethics Commission Client Information Supplemental Attachment SFEC Form 3410B-AS3 Email Address of Business Telephone of Client # Name of Client Client Contact Person Business Address of Client Client Client Compensation Synapse Janet Lee 25 Taylor Street, San [email protected] 646-831-5484 $295/hour Development Francisco, CA 94103 1 Group Strada Investment Clarke Miller 101 Mission Street, Suite [email protected] 415-572-7640 $350/hour Group 420, San Francisco, CA 2 94105 SKS Partners Hillary Gerber 601 California Street, Suite [email protected] 415-421-8200 $310/hour 1310, San Francisco, CA 3 94108 DS&F Architect, PC Michelle Chen 121 W. 27th Street, New [email protected] 212-481-7202 x111 $350/hour 4 York, NY 10001 CFW 55 Owner Diego Rico 7121 Fairway Drive, Suite david.hernandez@us. 415-362-2613 x114 $350/hour LLC 410, Palm Beach Gardens, rlb.com 5 FL 33418 Align Real Estate Julian Marsh 1 California Street, 4th jmarsh@alignrealestat 415-351-9842 $310/hour Floor, San Francisco, CA e.com 6 94111 Forge Development Richard Hannum 155 Montgomery Street, richard@forgelandco 415-215-8702 $350/hour Partners Suite 300, San Francisco, CA mpany.com 7 94104 Strada Investment Clarke Miller 101 Mission Street, Suite [email protected] 415-572-7640 $350/hour Group 420, San Francisco, CA 8 94105 Strada Investment Clarke Miller 101 Mission Street, Suite [email protected] 415-572-7640 $350/hour Group 420, San Francisco, CA 9 94105 181 Fremont Street, Jake Albini Four Embarcadero Center,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • United States Bankruptcy Court District of Delaware
    Case 20-11779-LSS Doc 55 Filed 07/09/20 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ------------------------------------------------------------ x In re : Chapter 11 : VIVUS, INC., et al., : Case No. 20–11779 (LSS) : : Debtors.1 : (Joint Administration Requested) ------------------------------------------------------------ x NOTICE OF FILING OF PROPOSED REDACTED VERSION OF THE CREDITOR MATRIX PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Rule 9018-1(d)(ii) of the Local Rules of Bankruptcy Practice and Procedure of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, VIVUS, Inc. and its debtor affiliates, as debtors and debtors in possession in the above-captioned chapter 11 cases, hereby file the attached proposed redacted version of the Creditor Matrix2 with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, 824 North Market Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801. 1 The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases, along with the last four digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable are: Vivus B.V. (1942); Vivus Digital Health Corporation (0625); VIVUS, Inc. (6179); and Vivus Pharmaceuticals Limited (9329). The Debtors’ corporate headquarters and service address is 900 E. Hamilton Avenue, Suite 550, Campbell, CA 95008. 2 Contemporaneously herewith, the Debtors have filed the Motion of Debtors for Entry of Order (I) Authorizing Debtors to Redact Certain Personal Identification Information in Creditor Matrix and Certain Other Documents and (II) Granting Related Relief. RLF1 23325296v.1 Case 20-11779-LSS Doc 55 Filed 07/09/20 Page 2 of 19 Dated: July 9, 2020 Wilmington, Delaware /s/ Sarah E. Silveira RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, P.A. Mark D.
    [Show full text]
  • Company First Name Last Name #Smartcohort David Capelli #Smartcohort Carla Mays 10 Jennifer Walker 123 Contracting Michael Friedman 4083716800 Muhie Maaz A
    Company First Name Last Name #SmartCohort David Capelli #SmartCohort Carla Mays 10 Jennifer Walker 123 Contracting Michael Friedman 4083716800 Muhie Maaz A. Esteban & Company, Inc Alfonso C. Esteban A3GEO, Inc. Dona Mann Abtahi Engineering ManagementAfshin Consulting Abtahi Abundance Worldwide EnterprisesDollene Jones ACCIONA Fernando Vara ACCIONA Jesús García Acciona Luis Palazzi Acciona Jesus Garcia Acciona Fernando Vara ACCIONA Luis Palazzi ACCIONA CONSTRUCTION FERNANDO VARA ORTIZ DE LA TORRE Acciona Infrastructure North AmericaRafael Sanchez Achievement Engineering Corp. Arash Firouzjaei ActiveWayz Engineering Constance Farris ActiveWayz Engineering Admas Zewdie Acumen Building Enterprise Inc. Gian Fiero Acumen Building Enterprise Inc. Robert Pilgrim ADA Takuya Nagai Adelaide Strategies marvin williams ADKO Engineering, Inc. President Kanaan Advantage Supply David Ibanez Doria AECOM Mel Sears AECOM nasri munfah AECOM Paul Nicholas AECOM Paul Boddie AECOM Emile Jilwan AECOM Russel Rudden AECOM Jon Porterfield AerialZeus, LLC Luis Robles Aero-Environmental Consulting, JorgeINC. Vizcaino All Trade Coordinators, Inc. Thelma King Ally Rail Consutling Douglas Deming Alpine Rail Group Buzz Berger ALSTOM Transportation Inc. Muriel LUO Anrak Corporation Mark Hamilton ANTHONIO, INC. TONY OGBEIDE Apadana Engineering, Inc. sopida siadat Aptim Environmental & Infrastructure,Rob LLC Delnagro Arad Adam Rad Arcadis U.S., Inc. Girish Kripalani Arora Engineers, Inc. Adam Oliver Arup Orion Fulton Arup North America LTD Luis Piek ASC Rahul Vaishnav ASC Henry Adley ASC Lorda Rumbaua ASC Dots Oyenuga ASC Dots Oyenuga Assurant Innovations Takeo Kimura Atkins Sergio Callen ATKINSON CONSTRUCTION ROHIT SHETTY Auriga Corporation Thomas Gibson Auriga Corporation Parkash Daryani Azad Engineering PC Mahsa Azad A-Zone Environmental Services, LLCMike Bruzzesi AZTEC/TYPSA Karim Dada AZTEC/TYPSA Carlos Tarazaga BabEng LLC Rene Reichl Badger Dalighting Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • April 25, 2008 Comments on the ALJ Ruling on Cost
    BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Rulemaking Regarding Policies and Protocols for Demand Response, Load Impact Estimates, Cost-Effectiveness Rulemaking 07-01-041 Methodologies, Megawatt Goals and (January 25, 2007) Alignment with California Independent System Operator Market Design Protocols COMMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR ON THE ALJ RULING REGARDING THE COST EFFECTIVENESS FRAMEWORK The California Independent System Operator Corporation (“CAISO”) submits its comments regarding the ALJ’s Ruling re Comments on the Cost Effectiveness Framework, dated April 4, 2008, (“Ruling”) and Attachment A to the Ruling, “Draft Demand Response Cost Effectiveness Protocols” (“Staff Protocols”). Introduction As the Ruling states, the methodology set forth in the Staff Protocols is based largely upon the Cost Effectiveness Framework (aka Consensus Parties Framework) that the Joint Parties submitted in this proceeding in November 2007. (Ruling at pp. 1-2.) The Ruling further notes that party comments should address “the completeness, accuracy, and feasibility of the staff proposal.” (Ruling at p. 2.). The CAISO’s comments herein are intended either (1) to raise points for further refinement of the protocol’s interim methodologies or (2) to raise points that the CAISO believes should be included within the document, so that they are “teed up” for consideration when the - 1 - R.07-01-041 CAISO COMMENTS ON DRAFT DR CE PROTOCOLS protocols are revised with reformulated criteria intended to replace the interim methodologies1. Overall, the CAISO considers the Staff Protocols to be a sound basis for interim review of DR programs that will be presented to the Commission in 2009 for the procurement cycle period of 2009 to 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Kicks Off with Strong Leasing Activity
    Research & Forecast Report SAN FRANCISCO | OFFICE MARKET Q1 | 2019 > VACANCY The overall vacancy rate in San Francisco rose 90 basis points 2019 Kicks off with to 6.0 percent this quarter due to new construction hitting the market, but the vacancy rate remains at historic lows. Facebook preleased all the office space in the new construction and will be moving in later this year. Additionally, much Strong Leasing Activity of the spaces vacated by tenants this quarter has already been leased. Watch for the vacancy rate to shrink later this year as the tenants move into their new space. Gap, Inc. acquired 550 > LEASING VOLUME San Francisco experienced very strong leasing activity Terry Francois Blvd. for nearly $343 million during the first quarter, which translated to nearly 2.6 million square feet of ($1,211 psf) closed transactions. This is well above the 10-year average of nearly 1.9 million square feet. Technology companies continued their space grab in the City, and demand shows no signs of slowing. All six deals that closed over 100,000 square feet this quarter were new leases or expansions. Pinterest secured 490,000 square The largest transaction this quarter was Pinterest securing 490,000 square feet at 88 feet at 88 Bluxome Street. This is the second deal over the past six months Bluxome Street that completely preleased space in a proposed property that does not yet have COLUMBUS Slack leased Prop M allocations. Additionally, Asana leased nearly 266,000 square feet at 208,000 square 633 Folsom Street, Slack leased 208,000 square feet at 45 Fremont Street and feet at 45 Fremont Samsara leased 154,000 square feet at 2 Henry Adams Street.
    [Show full text]
  • OMA Bulletin Cypress Security, LLC Is Published Bi-Monthly
    MARCH/APRIL 2007 www.bomasf.org BOMA San Francisco advances the commercial real estate industry through advocacy, professional development, and information exchange “The BOMA CareerCenter BOMA Addresses Career Management is an excellent resource for reaching people interested in working in property Needs of Real Estate Professionals— management. I posted an opening Unveils BOMA SF CareerCenter & New Task Force for an Administrative Assistant position at Embarcadero Center to Promote Real Estate Management Careers and received resumes from three qualified candidates in the first week.” Kirsten Walraven Young, RPA, FMA Stephen L. Austin, RPA CB Richard Ellis at PG&E Regional Property Manager Boston Properties OMA San Francisco has been doing use of search agents that notify them a lot to support, and call attention when new candidates who match their to the career criteria have posted their On the Inside management needs of résumés. Job seekers benefit commercial real estate from free and confidential Bprofessionals. Responding to résumé posting, weekly, MEMBERSHIP CAMPAIGN increased demand by automated email notification UPDATE employers and recruiters for of new job listings, the ability access to highly qualified to save jobs for later review ••• 4 ••• property managers, we and related career unveiled the BOMA SF development services. CALENDAR CareerCenter in late February. This interactive job Another key element of the ••• 8 ••• board – found at CareerCenter is the dedicated http://careers.bomasf.org – Customer Support Center. We BOMA YP enables employers and have partnered with recruiters to reach a wide Kirsten Walraven, RPA, FMA Boxwood Technology, the ••• 9 ••• CB Richard Ellis at range of commercial real leading provider of online Pacific Gas & Electric estate management career center technology and 7TH ANNUAL PAC candidates.
    [Show full text]
  • 59 Ahern Robert the Honorable R
    Office_of_Career_and_Profession Last First Name Class of Agliano Nat Justice Nat Agliano '59 Ahern Robert The Honorable Robert Ahern '67 Alvarado Paul The Honorable Paul Alvarado '64 Ameral Ann The Honorable Ann Ameral '80 Anderson Clifford The Honorable Clifford Anderson '78 Anderson Lunell The Honorable Lunell Anderson '75 Antolini Lawrence The Honorable Lawrence Antolini '65 Appel Lawrence The Honorable Lawrence Appel '69 Armendariz Maria Judge Maria Armendariz '97 Atkins Don Commissioner Don Atkins '73 Austin Steven The Honorable Steven Austin '81 Ayabe Bert The Honorable Bert Ayabe '81 Barclay Fritz The Honorable Fritz Barclay '81 Barrett Thang The Honorable Thang Barrett '88 Bartholomew Lonny The Honorable Lonny Bartholomew '73 Bashant Cynthia The Honorable Cynthia Bashant '86 Baxter Marvin Justice Marvin Baxter '66 Beauchesne Roger The Honorable Roger Beauchesne '75 Biggar Thomas Comm. Thomas Biggar '71 Boeckman Bradley The Honorable Bradley Boeckman '70 Boessenecker Mark The Honorable Mark Boessenecker '86 Boren Terrence The Honorable Terrence Boren '68 Borick Arlene Commissioner Arlene Borick '84 Bounds Gary Comm. Gary Bounds '73 Boyack Douglas The Honorable Douglas Boyack '75 Bradbury Stephen The Honorable Stephen Bradbury '76 Brennan James The Honorable James Brennan '58 Brewster Bereola Gail The Honorable Gail Brewster Bereola '79 Brooks Nelson The Honorable Nelson Brooks '82 Burgess Rhonda The Honorable Rhonda Burgess '82 Burke James Judge James Burke '72 Bysshe Frederick The Honorable Frederick Bysshe '62 Cahill William
    [Show full text]
  • Agencies and Organizations
    Silicon Valley Rapid Transit Corridor Final EIR CHAPTER 10.0: AGENCIES AND ORGANIZATIONS This chapter presents a list of the agencies and organizations, and individuals who have been notified of the availability of the Draft EIS/EIR. Hard copies and electronic files (compact disks) of the draft document have been made available upon request. Copies of the Draft EIS/EIR may also be obtained online by visiting www.vtabart-vta.org. In addition, the Draft EIS/EIR has been made available for review at several libraries in Santa Clara and Alameda counties (see end of Section 10.1). VTA has also notified all property owners/tenants who may potentially be impacted by the SVRTC alternatives. 10.1 AGENCIES ELECTED OFFICIALS The Honorable Barbara Boxer The Honorable Bruce McPherson U.S. Senate California State Senate 650 Capitol Mall, Suite 6544 25 San Juan Grade Road #150 Sacramento, CA 95814 Salinas, CA 93906 The Honorable Diane Feinstein The Honorable Bryon Sher U.S. Senate California State Senate 1 Post Street, Suite 2450 100 Paseo de San Antonio, Suite 206 San Francisco, CA 94104 San Jose, CA 95113 The Honorable Anna Eshoo The Honorable Liz Figueroa U.S. House of Representatives California State Senate 698 Emerson Street 43271 Mission Boulevard Palo Alto, CA 94301 Fremont, CA 94539 The Honorable Ellen Tauscher The Honorable John Vasconcellos U.S. House of Representatives California State Senate 1801 North California Boulevard, Suite 103 100 Paseo de San Antonio, Suite 209 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 San Jose, CA 95113 The Honorable Mike Honda The Honorable Rebecca Cohn U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • April 14, 2008 Comments to the Proposed Decision
    BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Rulemaking Regarding Policies and Protocols for Demand Response, Load Impact Estimates, Cost-Effectiveness Rulemaking 07-01-041 Methodologies, Megawatt Goals and (January 25, 2007) Alignment with California Independent System Operator Market Design Protocols COMMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR TO THE PROPOSED DECISION ADOPTING PROTOCOLS FOR ESTIMATING DEMAND RESPONSE LOAD IMPACTS The California Independent System Operator Corporation (“CAISO”) submits its comments to the Proposed Decision (alternatively, “PD”) of ALJ Hecht Adopting Protocols for Estimating Demand Response Load Impacts, issued on March 25, 2008 in this proceeding. Introduction The Proposed Decision adopts protocols for estimating the impact of demand response (DR) activities on electric load; these protocols are set forth in Attachment A to the PD. The PD states that the protocols shall be used by the three Investor Owned Utilities in the preparation and evaluation of their 2009-2011 DR Program and Budget Applications, which are due to be filed on June 1, 2008. The PD addresses treatment of load impact issues for Phase 1 of the rulemaking. The further issues for treatment in the rulemaking include cost effectiveness methodologies in Phase 1 and the development of DR goals in Phase 2. R.07-01-041 CAISO COMMENTS ON PROPOSED DECISION The CAISO Supports the Development of an Operational Load Impact Protocol The CAISO is pleased that the PD includes a provision signaling that the Commission endorses the development of operational load impact protocols for use in CAISO operational planning and scheduling in CAISO wholesale markets. In this regard, the PD provides, in Section 6, as follows: 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Leasing Activity Remains Strong > VACANCY the Overall Vacancy Rate in the City This Quarter Edged Madison Capital Purchased Down 20 Basis Points to 6.9 Percent
    Research & Forecast Report SAN FRANCISCO | OFFICE MARKET Q3 | 2017 Leasing Activity Remains Strong > VACANCY The overall vacancy rate in the City this quarter edged Madison Capital purchased down 20 basis points to 6.9 percent. The direct vacancy decreased 150 Post Street for over 40 basis point to 6.0 percent while the vacant sublease rate nudge $69 million ($655 per up 10 basis points to 0.9 percent during the third quarter but remains square foot) Facebook secures their first significant City well below the high-water mark of 5.1 percent posted in 2002. The address taking all the North Financial and Jackson Square submarkets experienced the office space at 181 largest decline in vacancy, decreasing 40 basis points to 6.0 percent Fremont Street and 250 basis points to 2.7 percent respectively. There’s nearly 2.2 million square feet scheduled for delivery next quarter, while over WeWork moved into over 86 percent has been preleased this may translate into a temporary 60,000 square feet at 650 increase in vacancy until tenants move into their spaces. California Street > LEASING VOLUME Leasing activity in San Francisco continued to be robust with approximately 2.4 million square feet of transactions recorded. This is the second consecutive quarter in which leasing COLUMBUS activity surpassed the 10-year historical quarterly average of 1.7 million square feet. Demand for space in the City remains strong and doesn’t look to be cooling anytime soon. San Francisco continued to see multiple significant deals signed during the third quarter with three over 100,000 square feet.
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco Office Market Cools Down
    Research & Forecast Report SAN FRANCISCO | OFFICE MARKET Q1 | 2020 San Francisco Office > VACANCY San Francisco’s vacancy rate rose 80 basis points to 5.3 percent Market Cools Down which translated to nearly 749,000 square feet of negative net absorption. The South Financial District experienced nearly 267,000 square feet of negative net absorption. This is primarily due to Blue Shield vacating nearly 263,000 square feet at 50 Beale Street. Additionally, the Yerba Buena submarket posted nearly 318,000 square feet of negative net absorption due to Ellation vacating 110,000 square feet at 835 Market Street and Nektar vacating over 67,000 square feet at RFR Realty purchased 360 Third Street. 301 Battery Street for $143 million, ($769 psf) > LEASING VOLUME San Francisco’s leasing volume declined during the first quarter of the year, with nearly 840,000 square feet of closed transactions. This is well below the 20-year quarterly average of over 1.8 million square feet and marks the first time in the past few years that San Francisco has not had a 100,000 square foot deal close. The largest lease signed during the first quarter of the year was Knotel's sublease of nearly 84,000 square feet at 301 Brannan COLUMBUS Street. Despite this wane in leasing volume during the first quarter of 2020, technology companies continue to lead the charge for space in San Francisco. Skillz subleased for Technology tenants account for 46.3 percent of the demand in the City which nearly 52,000 square translates into nearly 4.1 million square feet of requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco Ethics Commission Disclosure Report for Permit
    DocuSign Envelope ID: 20CF541E-020E-4EE4-8D1D-504DAD7945D4 San Francisco Ethics Commission 25 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 220, San Francisco, CA 94102 Received on: Phone: 415.252.3100 . Fax: 415.252.3112 10-12-2018\DateSigned | 11:56:36\ PDT [email protected] . www.sfethics.org \DateSigned\ Disclosure Report for Permit Consultants SFEC Form 3410B (S.F. Campaign and Governmental Conduct Code § 3.400A et seq.) A Public Document 1. FILING INFORMATION TYPE OF FILING DATE OF ORIGINAL FILING (for amendment only) \OriginalFilingType\ \OriginalFilingDate\ PERIOD COVERED \PeriodMonths\ \PeriodYear\ July 1 to September 30 2018 2. PERMIT CONSULTANT AND EMPLOYER INFORMATION NAME OF PERMIT CONSULTANT NAME OF EMPLOYER Tony Sanchez-Corea \PermitConsultantName\ A.R.\PermitConsultantEmployer Sanchez-Corea & \Associates, Inc. BUSINESS ADDRESS 301 Junipero Serra Blvd., Suite 270, San Francisco, CA 94127 \PermitConsultantAddress\ BUSINESS TELEPHONE BUSINESS EMAIL ADDRESS 415-333-8080 [email protected] \PermitConsultantTelephone\ \PermitConsultantEmail\ 3. CLIENT INFORMATION Enter the name, business address, contact person (if applicable), e-mail address, and business telephone number of each client for whom you performed permit consulting services during the reporting period. Also enter the amount of compensation you or your employer received or expected to receive from each client for permit consulting services during the reporting period. # CLIENT INFORMATION NAME OF CLIENT One De Haro, LLC c/o SKS Investments \ClientName1\ BUSINESS ADDRESS OF CLIENT
    [Show full text]
  • SAN FRANCISCO Savills Research
    Q2 2019 MARKET IN MINUTES SAN FRANCISCO Savills Research Tenants active despite climbing asking rents; KEY STATISTICS y-o-y Q2 2018 Q2 2019 strong demand limits options in prime space Change Inventory 78.5 MSF 78.6 MSF Activity in San Francisco kept pace through the first half of the year with 2.5 Availability Rate 9.7% 7.7% million square feet (msf) leased in the second quarter, bringing the mid-year total to 5.2 msf. Tenants are on the move, even among ever-increasing asking Asking Rental Rate $74.64 $79.78 rents. Asking rents for all classes increased 6.8% year over year, now at $79.78 Class A Asking Rental Rate $80.19 $85.64 per square foot (psf). Class A asking rents increased at a similar pace, also rising 6.8% over the year to $85.64 psf. Price is not deterring tenants seeking top- Quarterly Leasing Activity 2.9 MSF 2.5 MSF quality space, and availability has contracted accordingly. Overall availability dropped 200 basis points year over year to 7.7% and is even more limited in Class ASKING RENT TRENDS A space, now at 7.3% (down 140 basis points year over year). Overall Asking Rent Class A Asking Rent $100.00 Still, some tenants are pushed out of cost-prohibitive markets $85.64 Rising rents have spurred some tenants to seek opportunities outside of San $80.00 Francisco’s core to expand or relocate to more cost-conscious locations. Credit $79.78 Karma, with its headquarters located at 760 Market Street in Union Square/Civic $60.00 Center, has decided to expand operations across the Bay.
    [Show full text]