DOCSLIB.ORG

Leasing Activity Remains Strong > VACANCY the Overall Vacancy Rate in the City This Quarter Edged Madison Capital Purchased Down 20 Basis Points to 6.9 Percent

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Leasing Activity Remains Strong > VACANCY the Overall Vacancy Rate in the City This Quarter Edged Madison Capital Purchased Down 20 Basis Points to 6.9 Percent Research & Forecast Report SAN FRANCISCO | OFFICE MARKET Q3 | 2017 Leasing Activity Remains Strong > VACANCY The overall vacancy rate in the City this quarter edged Madison Capital purchased down 20 basis points to 6.9 percent. The direct vacancy decreased 150 Post Street for over 40 basis point to 6.0 percent while the vacant sublease rate nudge $69 million ($655 per up 10 basis points to 0.9 percent during the third quarter but remains square foot) Facebook secures their first significant City well below the high-water mark of 5.1 percent posted in 2002. The address taking all the North Financial and Jackson Square submarkets experienced the office space at 181 largest decline in vacancy, decreasing 40 basis points to 6.0 percent Fremont Street and 250 basis points to 2.7 percent respectively. There’s nearly 2.2 million square feet scheduled for delivery next quarter, while over WeWork moved into over 86 percent has been preleased this may translate into a temporary 60,000 square feet at 650 increase in vacancy until tenants move into their spaces. California Street > LEASING VOLUME Leasing activity in San Francisco continued to be robust with approximately 2.4 million square feet of transactions recorded. This is the second consecutive quarter in which leasing COLUMBUS activity surpassed the 10-year historical quarterly average of 1.7 million square feet. Demand for space in the City remains strong and doesn’t look to be cooling anytime soon. San Francisco continued to see multiple significant deals signed during the third quarter with three over 100,000 square feet. The largest lease signed in the past EMBARCADERO three years closed this quarter with Facebook leasing all the office space at 181 Fremont Street, Airbnb leased 290,000 square feet at GREEN 650 Townsend Street and Amazon secured nearly 176,000 square feet at 525 Market Street. BROADWAY GRANT > ABSORPTION San Francisco posted nearly 169,000 square feet of TAYLOR WASHINGTON LEAVENWORTH HYDE positive net absorption as the third quarter came to an end. The North V A N N E S S Financial and Jackson Square submarkets were primarily responsible CALIFORNIA for the growth in net absorption posting over 66,000 square feet SPEAR 80 and nearly 57,000 square feet, respectively. Tenant demand remains BUSH FREMONT strong, even with Facebook securing their 412,000-square foot space, the market currently has over 5.6 million square feet of office space 1 S T MARKET requirements involving 210 tenants in the market and twelve of those requirements are over 100,000 square feet of space. GEARY POWELL 3 R D > RENTS Rents in the City continued to rise over the third quarter MISSION with overall citywide weighted rents climbing up 8.8 percent to 5 T H $80.59 per square foot. Key contributors to the increase experienced FOLSOM over the past 90 days are five large deals that are $87 or higher. BRYANT Overall Class A weighted rents grew 9.4 percent to $84.34 per square 7 T H BRANNAN foot. The Financial District overall weighted Class B rents had the 4 T H TOWNSEND HAYES largest increase this quarter growing 23 percent to $84.13 per square 80 KING foot. Across the board all non-weighted rents also experienced rent 1 0 T H growth. 3 R D TERRY A FRANCOIS Market Indicators 7 T H Relative to prior period Q3 2017 2017 Forecast 4 T H 101 VACANCY OWENS NET ABSORPTION 1 6 T H 280 CONSTRUCTION 80 WEIGHTED RENTAL RATE NON-WEIGHTED RENTAL RATE 1 9 T H SALES VOLUME SALES PRICES Rental Rates San Francisco – Office Rents - Q3 2017 % OVERALL Leasing activity in San Francisco continues 3Q '17 3Q '17 3Q '17 2Q '17 MARKET QUARTERLY OVERALL DIRECT SUBLEASE OVERALL to be one of the healthiest in the country. CHANGE The strength of the market can be seen with All Markets $80.59 $81.42 $69.14 $74.08 8.8% overall weighted rents climbing up from All Markets: Class A $84.34 $85.75 $67.22 $77.07 9.4% $74.08 to $80.59 per square foot. Large All Markets: Class B $75.83 $76.28 $65.32 $74.28 2.1% chucks of space leased at properties currently under construction are one of the contributors Financial District: Class A $85.04 $86.33 $69.30 $77.38 9.9% to the rent growth for both weighted and Financial District: Class B $84.13 $84.97 $74.55 $68.42 23.0% non-weighted rents in the City. In the SOMA SOMA Overall $78.88 $78.95 $68.60 $80.95 -2.6% submarket there was a slight decline in Source: Colliers International Note: Weighted Average Rents weighted rents from a record high of $80.95 to $78.88 per square foot this quarter, but year over year weighted rents in SOMA have grown 10.2 percent. 1,700,000 20.0% 1,200,000 15.0% 10.0% Absorption & Vacancy 700,000 The North Financial District and Jackson 5.0% Square submarket fueled the largest 200,000 occupancy gains posting over 66,000 and 0.0% nearly 57,000 square feet of positive net absorption, respectively. In the North Financial -300,000 District, WeWork moved into nearly 61,000 square feet at 650 California Street, Upgrade -800,000 occupied over 33,000 square feet at 275 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q Battery Street and Wikimedia occupied over '07 '07 '07 '07 '08 '08 '08 '08 '09 '09 '09 '09 '10 '10 '10 '10 '11 '11 '11 '11 '12 '12 '12 '12 '13 '13 '13 '13 '14 '14 '14 '14 '15 '15 '15 '15 '16 '16 '16 '16 '17 '17 '17 19,000 square feet at 1 Montgomery Street. Source: Colliers International Vacancy Net Absorption Helping to post positive net absorption in the Jackson Square submarket, HealthTap move into over 20,000 square feet at 755 Sansome Street and Brightidea occupied nearly 9,900 square feet at 560 Davis Street. $2.9B San Francisco Sales Activity (Billions) # Transactions in office $10.0 investment sales 80 YTD 2017 $9.0 68 70 Investment Volume 68 $8.0 Office assets in the San Francisco market 57 60 continue to be highly sought-after by both $7.0 53 international and local investors. While San Francisco investment sales volumes slowed 50 50 a bit this quarter, primarily due to lack of $6.0 45 product on the market, total year-to-date investment sales volumes of nearly 2.9 billion $5.0 38 38 40 36 were posted and is mirroring the year-to-date 32 sales activity posted during the third quarter $4.0 30 in 2016. Investment sales activity was evenly 25 23 spread across the submarkets throughout the $3.0 City. The largest deal this quarter, 150 Post 18 [VALUE] 17 20 Street, closed in August to Madison Capital 14 $2.0 10 for over $69.3 million or ($655 per square 8 foot). Additionally, Shorenstein purchased 10 $1.0 901 Battery Street for $55 million or ($612 per $0.3 square foot) from The Swig Company. $1.9 $0.4 $0.1 $0.5 $1.8 $3.5 $3.2 $9.8 $0.7 $1.5 $2.8 $6.0 $2.4 $6.0 $3.7 $4.6 $2.9 $0.0 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 YTD Source: Colliers International 2 San Francisco Research & Forecast Report | Q3-2017 | San Francisco / Office Market | Colliers International Major Office Lease Transactions - Q3 2017 ADDRESS TENANT SIZE TYPE SIGNED DATE CLASS 181 Fremont Street Facebook (Instagram) 412,234 New Sep-17 A 650 Townsend Street Airbnb 290,000 New Jul-17 B 525 Market Street Amazon 175,727 New Jul-17 A 153 Townsend Street Ancestry.com 92,541 Renewal/Expansion Sep-17 A 415 Mission Street WeWork 76,401 New Aug-17 A 44 Montgomery Street WeWork 73,000 New Aug-17 A 645 Harrison Street Planet Labs* 64,121* New Sep-17 C 315 Montgomery Street LendingHome 60,212 New Aug-17 B 185 Berry Street - Wharf Lyft 57,692 New Sep-17 A 45 Fremont Street Gensler 54,163 New Sep-17 A 989 Market Street Zendesk 51,810 Renewal/Expansion Aug-17 B 560 Mission Street Delta Dental 45,000 New Jul-17 A *Some of the leased space was Production/Distribution/Repair (PDR) Major Office Sale Transactions - Q3 2017 ADDRESS SELLER BUYER SQ.FT. SALES DATE CLASS SALE PRICE PRICE/SQ.FT. 222 2nd Street (Recapitalization) JP Morgan Chase Tishman Speyer 452,418 Sep-17 A $542,900,000 $1,200 150 Post Street Federal Realty Investment Trust Madison Capital 105,833 Aug-17 B $69,330,000 $655 901 Battery Street The Swig Co. Shorenstein 89,904 Sep-17 A $55,000,000 $612 3180 Eighteenth Street Bridgeton Holdings American Realty Advisors 37,104 Jul-17 B $34,000,000 $916 665 Chestnut Street Thomas Fallows Sunhill Corporation 16,900 Jul-17 C $9,435,000 $558 San Francisco Development Pipeline Over 51 percent of the properties currently 1,600,000 1,400,000 under construction 1,200,000 have been 1,000,000 preleased. 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 Salesforce 1st & Mission - 250 Howard: 1800 Owens St Blocks 29- 1455 & 1515 3rd 181 Fremont 350 Bush 100 Hooper St 510 Townsend 501-505 (Transbay) 50 1st St/First Park Tower (Block 40)/The 32/Chase Street* Street St/500 Pine (N & S buildings) Street Brannan St Tower - 101 1st Street Tower Exchange @ 16th Center/Warrior Street St/415 Mission Arena St* PRELEASED VACANT 3 San Francisco Research & Forecast Report | Q3-2017 | San Francisco / Office Market | Colliers International Development Pipeline square feet come mid-October.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • United States Bankruptcy Court District of Delaware
    Case 20-11779-LSS Doc 55 Filed 07/09/20 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ------------------------------------------------------------ x In re : Chapter 11 : VIVUS, INC., et al., : Case No. 20–11779 (LSS) : : Debtors.1 : (Joint Administration Requested) ------------------------------------------------------------ x NOTICE OF FILING OF PROPOSED REDACTED VERSION OF THE CREDITOR MATRIX PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Rule 9018-1(d)(ii) of the Local Rules of Bankruptcy Practice and Procedure of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, VIVUS, Inc. and its debtor affiliates, as debtors and debtors in possession in the above-captioned chapter 11 cases, hereby file the attached proposed redacted version of the Creditor Matrix2 with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, 824 North Market Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801. 1 The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases, along with the last four digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable are: Vivus B.V. (1942); Vivus Digital Health Corporation (0625); VIVUS, Inc. (6179); and Vivus Pharmaceuticals Limited (9329). The Debtors’ corporate headquarters and service address is 900 E. Hamilton Avenue, Suite 550, Campbell, CA 95008. 2 Contemporaneously herewith, the Debtors have filed the Motion of Debtors for Entry of Order (I) Authorizing Debtors to Redact Certain Personal Identification Information in Creditor Matrix and Certain Other Documents and (II) Granting Related Relief. RLF1 23325296v.1 Case 20-11779-LSS Doc 55 Filed 07/09/20 Page 2 of 19 Dated: July 9, 2020 Wilmington, Delaware /s/ Sarah E. Silveira RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, P.A. Mark D.
    [Show full text]
  • F I L E D 07-18-12 04:59 Pm
    BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA F I L E D 07-18-12 04:59 PM Order Instituting Rulemaking to Continue R. 11-05-005 Implementation and Administration of California (Filed May 5, 2011) Renewables Portfolio Standard Program CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Annie Pham, certify that I have on this 18th day of July 2012 caused a copy of the foregoing SIERRA CLUB CALIFORNIA REPLY COMMENTS ON THE ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER’S RULING IDENTIFYING ISSUES AND SCHEDULE OF REVIEW FOR 2012 RENEWABLES PORTFOLIO STANDARD PROCUREMENT PLANS PURSUANT TO PUBLIC UTILITIES CODE SECTIONS 399.11 ET SEQ. AND REQUESTING COMMENTS ON NEW PROPOSALS to be served on all known parties to R.11-05-005 listed on the most recently updated service list available on the California Public Utilities Commission website, via email to those listed with email and via U.S. mail to those without email service, and to the Administrative Law Judge. ALJ Regina DeAngelis California Public Utilities Commission Division of Administrative Law Judges 505 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, California 94102 Michael Meacham City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Morgan Hansen Morgan Stanley-Commodities 2000 Westchester Ave 1st Floor, Purchase, NY, 10577 Samara Rassi Fellon-Mccord & Associates 10200 Forest Green Blvd., Ste. 501 Louisville, KY, 40223-5183 Commerce Energy, Inc. 5251 Westheimer Rd. Ste. 1000 Houston, TX, 77056-5414 Harvey Eder Public Solar Power Coalition 1218 12th Street, No. 25 Santa Monica, CA 90401 Kellie M. Hanigan Enco Utility Services 8141 E. KAISER BLVD., STE. 212 Anaheim, CA 92808 Rafi Hassan Susquehanna Financial Group, LLP 101 California St., Ste 3250 San Francisco, CA 94111 Tony Chen Cool Earth Solar 4659 Las Positas Rd., 94551 Livermore, CA 94551 Mountain Utilities PO Box 1 Kirkwood, CA 95646 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
    [Show full text]
  • DATE: July 11, 2013 TO: Historic Preservation Commissioners FROM: Daniel A
    DATE: July 11, 2013 TO: Historic Preservation Commissioners FROM: Daniel A. Sider, Planning Department Staff RE: Market Analysis of the Sale of Publicly Owned TDR In May 2012, Planning Department (“Department”) Staff provided the Historic Preservation Commission (“HPC”) an informational presentation on the City’s Transferable Development Rights (“TDR”) program. In February 2013, the Department retained Seifel Consulting, Inc. and C.H. Elliott & Associates (jointly, “Consultants”) to perform a market analysis informing a possible sale of TDR from City-owned properties. The resulting work product (“Report”) was delivered to the Department in late June. This memo and the attached Report are intended to provide the HPC with relevant follow-up information from the May 2012 hearing. The City’s TDR Program Since the mid-1980’s, the Planning Department has administered a TDR program (“Program”) through which certain historic properties can sell their unused development rights to certain non- historic properties. The program emerged from the 1985 Downtown Plan in response to unprecedented office growth, housing impacts, transportation impacts and the loss of historic buildings. The key goal of the Program is to maintain Downtown’s development potential while protecting historic resources. The metric that underpins the Program is Floor Area Ratio ("FAR"), which is the ratio of a building’s gross square footage to that of the parcel on which it sits. Under the Program, a Landmark, Significant, or Contributory building can sell un-built FAR capacity to a non-historic property which can then use it to supplement its base FAR allowance. TDRs can only be used to increase FAR within applicable height and bulk controls.
    [Show full text]
  • 181 Fremont Street
    SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT Certificate of Determination 1650 Mission St. Suite 400 EXEMPTION FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW San Francisco, CA 94103-2479 Case No.: 2007.0456E Reception: Project Title: 181 Fremont Street 415.558.6378 Zoning/Plan Area: C-3-0 (SD) Downtown Office Special Development District; Transit Center Commercial Special Use District; 415.558.6409 700-S Height and Bulk District; Transit Center District Plan Block/Lot: Planning 3719/10 & 11 Information: Lot Size: 15,312.5 square feet 415.558.6377 Project Sponsor: Daniel R. Kingsley, SKS Fremont, LLC, (415) 421-8200 Staff Contact: Michael Jacinto (415) 575-9033 [email protected] PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project sponsor, SKS Fremont, LLC, proposes to demolish two existing structures and develop one 700-foot-tall tower (745 feet to the top of the parapet/mechanical screen) on two lots located at the east side of Fremont Street immediately south of the new Transhay Transit Center that is currently under construction. The project site, as shown in Figure 1, comprises two parcels, is approximately 15,310 square feet in size, and is located within the approved Transit Center District Plan (TCDP or Plan) area. The proposed tower would include a mix of office, residential, and retail, along with five levels of below grade parking, off-street loading spaces, residential and office lobbies and amenities for the project residents (continued on next page). EXEMPT STATUS: Exempt per Section 15183 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines California. REMARKS: (see page 18, below) DETERMINATION: I do hereby certify that the above determination has been made pursuant to State and Local requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • June 2016 San Francisco Residential Development
    SAN FRANCISCO RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT JUNE 2016 NAVIGATION Click page numbers to be taken directly to page NEWS & MARKET CURRENTLY HIGHLIGHTS PERFORMANCE SELLING NEWS AND HIGHLIGHTS MARKET PERFORMANCE CURRENTLY SELLING Median $/SqFt Currently Year-Over-Year Month-Over-Month CURRENTLY SELLING... Luxe New Condominiump. $1,218/SqFt + 15% p. + 2% p. Nearly half of second phase is under contract. Price per square foot3 is 4 1650 Broadway at Van5 Ness | Pacific Heights Shipyard’s Resale Condominium $1,042/SqFt + 11% + 2% averaging approximately $760. The first phase averaged approximately $660 per Status: 34 units available/0 in-contract/0 closed square foot. New Apartment $5.10/SqFt + 7% N/A Pre-sale: August 2015 Closings anticipated: Q1 2016 Less than 100 units remain available at The Rockwell. Current absorption surpasses Project info: 34 units, 7-stories, 34 parking spaces 30 units a month. NEW CONDOMINIUM PRICING & VOLUME Developer: Belrich Partners Sales are expected to commence this month at the second phase of Onyx , consisting Architect: Forum Design of 21 condominiums. Median Price & Closing Volume Interior Design: Edmonds + Lee Features & Finishes: Marble tile and zinc facade, Floor- Closings have commenced at Lumina’s Plaza A. Price per square$1,200,000 foot is averaging 180 approximately $1,500. to-ceiling windows, Bay and Golden Gate views, Studio 160 Click development to be taken directly to page $1,000,000 Becker Cabinetry, Mobile kitchen islands, Caesarstone 140 Most Recent Quarter countertops, Subzero refrigerators, Thermador ap- $800,000ONE FRANKLIN 181 FREMONT ONE120 MISSION BAY THE HARRISONpliances, Uline THE wine coolers, PACIFIC Duravit and Hansgrohe 100 Median: $1,000,000 PROPOSED..
    [Show full text]
  • Q2 2017 SF Market Report.Indd
    Q2 2017 / Quarterly Office Market Report San Francisco Market Overview Market Facts Despite a slight uptick in class B vacancy, rent feet at 901 Market and Glu Mobile taking 57,024 growth across asset classes and increased tenant square feet at 875 Howard. demand from last quarter demonstrate a healthy Outside of the tech sector, First Republic Bank San Francisco market. While overall leasing was 6.9% signed the largest renewal of Q2 at 1 Front Street. down 13% relative to last quarter, a closer look Class A Vacancy They renewed 90,000 SF and expanded by an at certain submarkets shows positive market additional 88,000 SF within the same building. fundamentals. Both SOMA and the South Financial Co-working spaces also continued to expand their District saw a decrease in class A vacancy rates by presence in San Francisco this quarter as WeWork 10 and 20 basis points respectively. fi nalized leases at both 655 Montgomery and 2 6.8% Overall asking rates were up just slightly (0.9%) Embarcadero, while Regus owned Spaces signed Class B Vacancy from Q1, but class B asking rates rose 2.6% to just 35,313 SF at 1160 Battery. These means that co- over $66 per square foot. Citywide, class A rents working space now accounts for approximately rose 0.7% to $72.62 per square foot. These rents, 1.5 million square feet of offi ce space across San well above national averages, have forced tenants Francisco. to become more effi cient. We are seeing tenants As Salesforce Tower nears completion, leasing $70.29 FS take slightly smaller spaces that in previous years activity this quarter is pushing it towards delivering Class A and within their offi ces, the density of workers is almost entirely pre-leased.
    [Show full text]
  • Company First Name Last Name #Smartcohort David Capelli #Smartcohort Carla Mays 10 Jennifer Walker 123 Contracting Michael Friedman 4083716800 Muhie Maaz A
    Company First Name Last Name #SmartCohort David Capelli #SmartCohort Carla Mays 10 Jennifer Walker 123 Contracting Michael Friedman 4083716800 Muhie Maaz A. Esteban & Company, Inc Alfonso C. Esteban A3GEO, Inc. Dona Mann Abtahi Engineering ManagementAfshin Consulting Abtahi Abundance Worldwide EnterprisesDollene Jones ACCIONA Fernando Vara ACCIONA Jesús García Acciona Luis Palazzi Acciona Jesus Garcia Acciona Fernando Vara ACCIONA Luis Palazzi ACCIONA CONSTRUCTION FERNANDO VARA ORTIZ DE LA TORRE Acciona Infrastructure North AmericaRafael Sanchez Achievement Engineering Corp. Arash Firouzjaei ActiveWayz Engineering Constance Farris ActiveWayz Engineering Admas Zewdie Acumen Building Enterprise Inc. Gian Fiero Acumen Building Enterprise Inc. Robert Pilgrim ADA Takuya Nagai Adelaide Strategies marvin williams ADKO Engineering, Inc. President Kanaan Advantage Supply David Ibanez Doria AECOM Mel Sears AECOM nasri munfah AECOM Paul Nicholas AECOM Paul Boddie AECOM Emile Jilwan AECOM Russel Rudden AECOM Jon Porterfield AerialZeus, LLC Luis Robles Aero-Environmental Consulting, JorgeINC. Vizcaino All Trade Coordinators, Inc. Thelma King Ally Rail Consutling Douglas Deming Alpine Rail Group Buzz Berger ALSTOM Transportation Inc. Muriel LUO Anrak Corporation Mark Hamilton ANTHONIO, INC. TONY OGBEIDE Apadana Engineering, Inc. sopida siadat Aptim Environmental & Infrastructure,Rob LLC Delnagro Arad Adam Rad Arcadis U.S., Inc. Girish Kripalani Arora Engineers, Inc. Adam Oliver Arup Orion Fulton Arup North America LTD Luis Piek ASC Rahul Vaishnav ASC Henry Adley ASC Lorda Rumbaua ASC Dots Oyenuga ASC Dots Oyenuga Assurant Innovations Takeo Kimura Atkins Sergio Callen ATKINSON CONSTRUCTION ROHIT SHETTY Auriga Corporation Thomas Gibson Auriga Corporation Parkash Daryani Azad Engineering PC Mahsa Azad A-Zone Environmental Services, LLCMike Bruzzesi AZTEC/TYPSA Karim Dada AZTEC/TYPSA Carlos Tarazaga BabEng LLC Rene Reichl Badger Dalighting Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • April 25, 2008 Comments on the ALJ Ruling on Cost
    BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Rulemaking Regarding Policies and Protocols for Demand Response, Load Impact Estimates, Cost-Effectiveness Rulemaking 07-01-041 Methodologies, Megawatt Goals and (January 25, 2007) Alignment with California Independent System Operator Market Design Protocols COMMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR ON THE ALJ RULING REGARDING THE COST EFFECTIVENESS FRAMEWORK The California Independent System Operator Corporation (“CAISO”) submits its comments regarding the ALJ’s Ruling re Comments on the Cost Effectiveness Framework, dated April 4, 2008, (“Ruling”) and Attachment A to the Ruling, “Draft Demand Response Cost Effectiveness Protocols” (“Staff Protocols”). Introduction As the Ruling states, the methodology set forth in the Staff Protocols is based largely upon the Cost Effectiveness Framework (aka Consensus Parties Framework) that the Joint Parties submitted in this proceeding in November 2007. (Ruling at pp. 1-2.) The Ruling further notes that party comments should address “the completeness, accuracy, and feasibility of the staff proposal.” (Ruling at p. 2.). The CAISO’s comments herein are intended either (1) to raise points for further refinement of the protocol’s interim methodologies or (2) to raise points that the CAISO believes should be included within the document, so that they are “teed up” for consideration when the - 1 - R.07-01-041 CAISO COMMENTS ON DRAFT DR CE PROTOCOLS protocols are revised with reformulated criteria intended to replace the interim methodologies1. Overall, the CAISO considers the Staff Protocols to be a sound basis for interim review of DR programs that will be presented to the Commission in 2009 for the procurement cycle period of 2009 to 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco Tall Buildings Study
    SAN FRANCISCO TALL BUILDINGS STUDY Disclaimer: While the information presented in this report is believed to be correct, the Applied Technology Council assumes no responsibility for its accuracy or for the opinions expressed herein. The material presented in this publication should not be used or relied upon for any specific application without competent examination and verification of its accuracy, suitability, and applicability by qualified professionals. Users of information from this publication assume all liability arising from such use. San Francisco Tall Buildings Study Prepared by APPLIED TECHNOLOGY COUNCIL 201 Redwood Shores Parkway, Suite 240 Redwood City, California 94065 www.ATCouncil.org Prepared for City and County of San Francisco Office of Resilience and Capital Planning Brian Strong, Chief Resilience Officer and Director Danielle Mieler, Principal Resilience Analyst San Francisco, California ATC MANAGEMENT AND OVERSIGHT PROJECT TECHNICAL COMMITTEE Ayse Hortacsu John D. Hooper (Task Leader) Justin Moresco David Bonowitz Gregory Deierlein PROJECT WORKING GROUPS Shahriar Vahdani Carlos Molina Hutt Preetish Kakoty CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Anne McLeod Hulsey TALL BUILDINGS EXECUTIVE PANEL Alireza Eksir Monfared Naomi Kelly (Chair) Max Rattie Mary Ellen Carroll Wen-Yi Yen Kathryn How Tom Hui TASK REVIEW PANEL Brian Strong Mark X. Haley William Walton December 2018 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO TALL BUILDINGS STAKEHOLDERS Board of Supervisors Business District 3 San Francisco Chamber of Commerce District 6 Real Estate
    [Show full text]
  • City and County of San Francisco
    PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED JANUARY 30, 2019 NEW ISSUE - BOOK-ENTRY ONLY RATING: Fitch: “AA+” See “RATING” herein. In the opinion of Jones Hall, A Professional Law Corporation, San Francisco, California, Bond Counsel, subject, however to certain qualifications described in this Official Statement, under existing law, the interest on the Bonds is exempt from California personal income taxes. Interest on the Bonds is not intended to be exempt from federal income taxation. Bond Counsel expresses no opinion regarding other federal or State tax consequences relating to the ownership or disposition of, or the accrual or receipt of interest on, the Bonds. See “TAX MATTERS” herein. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2014-1 (TRANSBAY TRANSIT CENTER) $31,940,000* $152,205,000* Special Tax Bonds, Series 2019A Special Tax Bonds, Series 2019B (Federally Taxable) (Federally Taxable – Green Bonds) Dated: Date of Delivery Due: September 1, as shown on inside cover This cover page contains certain information for general reference only. It is not intended to be a summary of the security or terms of this issue. Investors must read the entire Official Statement to obtain information essential to making an informed investment decision. The City and County of San Francisco, California (the “City”) on behalf of the City and County of San Francisco Community Facilities District No. 2014-1 (Transbay Transit Center) (the “District”) will be issuing Special Tax Bonds, Series 2019A (Federally Taxable) (the “2019A Bonds”) and Special Tax Bonds, Series 2019B (Federally Taxable – Green Bonds) (the “2019B Bonds” and, together with the 2019A Bonds, the “2019 Bonds”).
    [Show full text]
  • Tehama San Francisco | California
    36 Tehama san francisco | California TRANSBAY MICRO-UNIT DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1288HOWARD 36Tehama Executive Summary Colliers International is pleased to present the opportunity to acquire 36 Tehama, (the “Property” or “Project”), an incredible Transbay development opportunity located in the San Francisco’s downtown core. The Project features an irreplaceable location surrounded by San Francisco’s most notable office occupiers including Salesforce and Facebook who occupy nearly 3.5M square feet of space steps from the Project’s front door. 2 Residential Micro-unit Project 45 8 419 Total Units Levels Avg. unit size NORTHPOINT ST. NORTHPOINT ST. COLUMBUS ST. BAY ST. BAY ST. VANDEWATER ST. 18,855 ST. MIDWAY Type III BRET HARTE WORDEN ST. FRANCISCO ST. FRANCISCO ST. THE EMBARCADERO Total SaleableWATER ST. Sq. Ft. Construction HOUSTON ST. PFEIFFER ST. BELL AIR ST. BELL CHESTNUT ST. CHESTNUT ST. VENARD FIELDING ST. WHITING ST. CULEBRA WINTHROP ST. WINTHROP JULIUS NEWELL ST. NEWELL LOMBARD ST. LOMBARD ST. EDGARDO PL. BLACKSTONE TUSCANY CHILD ST. EDITH JANSEN ST. TELEGRAPH GREENWICH ST. GREENWICH ST. 0 500 BRANT T PARDEE E L KRAMER GERKE E ROACH ST. G VALPARAISO ST. VALPARAISO ST. R HARRIS PL. A Scale in Feet P H VIA BUFANO VIA High-rise Alternative Hotel B L V D DARELL NAPIER SCOTLAND ST. ATTRIDGE FILBERT ST. FILBERT ST. HARWOOD HAVENS ST. ALTA ST. ALTA ST. REDFIELD ALLADIN TER. SCHOOL NOBLE'S PL. GENOA ALLEN ST. HASTINGS KENT ST. CADELL MOORE MARION PL. BLACK PL. UNION ST. UNION ST. WARNER SHARP WEBB PL. WINTER ROCKLAND PRICE RUSSELL ST. MACONDRAY LN. MONTAGUE COMMERCE ST.
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco Ethics Commission Disclosure Report for Permit
    DocuSign Envelope ID: E93BA072-AAE3-4AE2-B931-BCA55432FAA2 San Francisco Ethics Commission 25 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 220, San Francisco, CA 94102 Received on: Phone: 415.252.3100 . Fax: 415.252.3112 07-14-2020\DateSigned | 08:21:52\ PDT [email protected] . www.sfethics.org \DateSigned\ Disclosure Report for Permit Consultants SFEC Form 3410B (S.F. Campaign and Governmental Conduct Code § 3.400A et seq.) A Public Document 1. FILING INFORMATION TYPE OF FILING DATE OF ORIGINAL FILING (for amendment only) \OriginalFilingType\ \OriginalFilingDate\ PERIOD COVERED \PeriodMonths\ \PeriodYear\ April 1 to June 30 2020 2. PERMIT CONSULTANT AND EMPLOYER INFORMATION NAME OF PERMIT CONSULTANT NAME OF EMPLOYER John Fogarty \PermitConsultantName\ A.R.\PermitConsultantEmployer Sanchez-Corea & \Associates, Inc. BUSINESS ADDRESS 301 Junipero Serra Blvd, Suite 270, San Francisco, CA 94127 \PermitConsultantAddress\ BUSINESS TELEPHONE BUSINESS EMAIL ADDRESS 415-333-8080 [email protected] \PermitConsultantTelephone\ \PermitConsultantEmail\ 3. CLIENT INFORMATION Enter the name, business address, contact person (if applicable), e-mail address, and business telephone number of each client for whom you performed permit consulting services during the reporting period. Also enter the amount of compensation you or your employer received or expected to receive from each client for permit consulting services during the reporting period. # CLIENT INFORMATION NAME OF CLIENT One De Haro, LLC c/o SKS Investments \ClientName1\ BUSINESS ADDRESS OF CLIENT 601 California
    [Show full text]