2019 Kicks Off with Strong Leasing Activity

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2019 Kicks Off with Strong Leasing Activity Research & Forecast Report SAN FRANCISCO | OFFICE MARKET Q1 | 2019 > VACANCY The overall vacancy rate in San Francisco rose 90 basis points 2019 Kicks off with to 6.0 percent this quarter due to new construction hitting the market, but the vacancy rate remains at historic lows. Facebook preleased all the office space in the new construction and will be moving in later this year. Additionally, much Strong Leasing Activity of the spaces vacated by tenants this quarter has already been leased. Watch for the vacancy rate to shrink later this year as the tenants move into their new space. Gap, Inc. acquired 550 > LEASING VOLUME San Francisco experienced very strong leasing activity Terry Francois Blvd. for nearly $343 million during the first quarter, which translated to nearly 2.6 million square feet of ($1,211 psf) closed transactions. This is well above the 10-year average of nearly 1.9 million square feet. Technology companies continued their space grab in the City, and demand shows no signs of slowing. All six deals that closed over 100,000 square feet this quarter were new leases or expansions. Pinterest secured 490,000 square The largest transaction this quarter was Pinterest securing 490,000 square feet at 88 feet at 88 Bluxome Street. This is the second deal over the past six months Bluxome Street that completely preleased space in a proposed property that does not yet have COLUMBUS Slack leased Prop M allocations. Additionally, Asana leased nearly 266,000 square feet at 208,000 square 633 Folsom Street, Slack leased 208,000 square feet at 45 Fremont Street and feet at 45 Fremont Samsara leased 154,000 square feet at 2 Henry Adams Street. Street EMBARCADERO > ABSORPTION After six consecutive quarters of positive net absorption, San Francisco posted approximately 105,000 square feet of negative net absorption. This can be attributed to a lack of substantial move-ins since the end of last GREEN year. Tenant demand in San Francisco remains strong with an average of nearly BROADWAY 6.8 million square feet of requirements for the first quarter of the year. The year kicked off with strong tour activity during the first three months of 2019. GRANT TAYLOR WASHINGTON There are currently 171 tenant requirements and 18 of those requirements LEAVENWORTH HYDE V A N N E S S are over 100,000 square feet. It should be no surprise that the technology CALIFORNIA sector continues to drive most of the demand at approximately 42 percent SPEAR 80 of the current requirements. The second largest tenant demand comes from BUSH Coworking tenants, who account for 18.4 percent of the market requirements. FREMONT MARKET 1 S T > RENTS Overall weighted rents rose 2.1 percent to $87.15 per square foot and non-weighted rents grew 2.8 percent to $77.81 per square foot during the first GEARY quarter of the year. Some of the largest increases were with Class B rents in the POWELL 3 R D Financial District. Overall weighted rents in this submarket grew by 12.1 percent MISSION to $80.73 per square foot and non-weighted rose by 5.5 percent to $74.47 per 5 T H square foot. This can largely be attributed to multiple leases signed over $85 per FOLSOM square foot. Overall weighted Class A rents in the Financial District fell by 2.4 BRYANT percent to $90.29 per square foot, while non-weighted rents in this submarket 7 T H BRANNAN inched up by 1.7 percent to $81.08 per square foot. 4 T H TOWNSEND HAYES 80 KING 1 0 T H 3 R D 7 T H TERRY A FRANCOIS 4 T H Market Indicators 101 Relative to prior period Q1 2019 2019 Forecast OWENS VACANCY 280 1 6 T H NET ABSORPTION 80 CONSTRUCTION WEIGHTED RENTAL RATE 1 9 T H NON-WEIGHTED RENTAL RATE SALES VOLUME SALES PRICES Rental Rates San Francisco – Office Rents - Q1 2019 Major Office Lease Transactions - Q1 2019 Overall weighted sublease rents dropped 2.3 % OVERALL 1Q '19 1Q '19 1Q '19 4Q '18 ADDRESS TENANT SIZE TYPE SIGNED DATE CLASS MARKET QUARTERLY percent to $80.99 per square foot, and non- OVERALL DIRECT SUBLEASE OVERALL CHANGE weighted sublease rents declined 3.1 percent to 88 Bluxome Street Pinterest 490,000 Lease Mar-19 A All Markets $87.15 $87.55 $80.99 $85.36 2.1% $74.73 per square foot. This is down from record 633 Folsom Asana 265,890 Lease Mar-19 B high sublease rents from the fourth quarter at All Markets: Class A $90.06 $90.48 $83.43 $92.00 -2.1% $82.86 and $77.10 respectively. Meanwhile, 45 Fremont Street Slack 208,000 Lease/Expansion Mar-19 A All Markets: Class B $81.05 $81.30 $78.45 $79.34 2.2% overall weighted Class A sublease rents increased 2 Henry Adams Street Samsara 154,000 Lease Mar-19 B Financial District: Class A $90.29 $90.62 $84.73 $92.54 -2.4% significantly by 17.9 percent to $83.43. Helping to increase weighted Class A sublease rents can be 215 Fremont Google 140,000 Lease/Expansion Mar-19 A Financial District: Class B $80.73 $81.08 $75.99 $71.99 12.1% attributed to a couple of larger sublease deals such 3 Embarcadero Center Cooley LLP 127,640 Lease Jan-19 A SOMA Overall $79.22 $78.26 $85.99 $84.72 -6.5% as Nasdaq’s sublease at 505 Howard Street and 4 Embarcadero Center Marsh USA 85,000 Renewal Jan-19 A Source: Colliers International Note: Weighted Average Rents The Athletic Media Company at 525 Market Street. Both subleases had effective rents over $85 per 475 Brannan Street, Suite 200, 300, 320, & 330 Fastly 71,343 Renewal/Extensions Mar-19 B square foot. Overall weighted rents in Jackson 1455 Market Street WeWork 66,056 Lease/Expansion Mar-19 A Square experienced an increase of 8.5 percent 225 Bush Street Sunrun 43,850 Lease Feb-19 B to $80.29 per square foot. Helping to increase 1,700,000 20.0% weighted rents in this submarket were deals such 71 Stevenson Street, 11-13 Uber 42,600 Sublease Jan-19 A as Minted’s renewal at 747 Front Street and the 747 Front Street Minted 38,000 Renewal Feb-19 B H2O Plus deal at 727 Sansome Street. 15.0% 1,200,000 Absorption & Vacancy Major Office Sale Transactions - Q1 2019 10.0% 700,000 The San Francisco office market experienced ADDRESS SELLER BUYER SQ.FT. SALES DATE CLASS SALE PRICE PRICE/SQ.FT. an occupancy loss of over 105,000 square feet 550 Terry Francois Blvd Hines Gap, Inc. 282,773 Feb-19 A $342,500,000 $1,211 5.0% during the first quarter. The occupancy loss in the market can be attributed to a lack of significant 215 Fremont Street Jack Resnick & Sons Clarion Partners/ 373,500 Feb-19 A $335,500,000 $898 200,000 move-ins during the first quarter. The Financial Jones Lang LaSalle Income Property 111 Sutter Street The Paramount Group 284,527 Feb-19 B $227,000,000 $798 Trust 0.0% District experienced the largest occupancy loss, posting just over 225,000 square feet of negative 350 Rhode Island - South Bldg. Lincoln Property Company PCCP LLC 139,393 Feb-19 A $120,000,000 $861 net absorption. Significant contributors to the -300,000 410 Townsend Street Zurich Clarion Partners 74,620 Mar-19 B $85,600,000 $1,147 absorption loss was Blue Shield of California giving back additional space, as well as the Bechtel Alexandria Real Estate 260 Townsend Street CIM Commercial Trust Corporation 84,733 Mar-19 B $66,000,000 $779 Group vacating 30,000 square feet at 50 Beale Equities -800,000 Street. Additionally, at 1 Maritime Plaza, Hellman & 432-436 Jackson Street Graham Arader Mark Armenante 8,190 Jan-19 B $8,101,507 $989 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q Friedman vacated nearly 22,000 square feet and '08 '08 '09 '09'09 '09 '10 '10 '10 '10 '11 '11 '11 '11 '12 '12 '12 '12 '13 '13 '13 '13 '14 '14 '14 '14 '15 '15 '15 '15 '16 '16 '16 '16 '17 '17 '17 '17 '18 '18 '18 '18 '19 Takoda 530 Bryant 528-530 Bryant Street Richard Dewey Jr. 5,000 Feb-19 B $5,360,000 $1,072 Hill Capital moved out of approximately 22,000 Street, LLC Source: Colliers International Vacancy Net Absorption square feet. Some of this space has already been leased to Google with an occupancy for later this year. At 1 Market Street, Salesforce partially moved Flexible Office Market Share in San Francisco Historical out of some of their space of which has also been San Francisco Flexible Office Market Share 19-year annual leased to Google. At 88 Kearny Street, Bank of the $10.0 average sales 80 West vacated over 27,000 square feet on the 4th volume is $3 and 5th floors. $9.0 68 billion 70 68 $8.0 Investment Volume Werqwise 57 60 60 The investment sales market was very active 1.5% Other $7.0 53 during the first quarter of 2019 with eight 19.4% 50 investment sales closing at nearly $1.2 billion in Industrious $6.0 investment volume.
Recommended publications
  • United States Bankruptcy Court District of Delaware
    Case 20-11779-LSS Doc 55 Filed 07/09/20 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ------------------------------------------------------------ x In re : Chapter 11 : VIVUS, INC., et al., : Case No. 20–11779 (LSS) : : Debtors.1 : (Joint Administration Requested) ------------------------------------------------------------ x NOTICE OF FILING OF PROPOSED REDACTED VERSION OF THE CREDITOR MATRIX PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Rule 9018-1(d)(ii) of the Local Rules of Bankruptcy Practice and Procedure of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, VIVUS, Inc. and its debtor affiliates, as debtors and debtors in possession in the above-captioned chapter 11 cases, hereby file the attached proposed redacted version of the Creditor Matrix2 with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, 824 North Market Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801. 1 The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases, along with the last four digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable are: Vivus B.V. (1942); Vivus Digital Health Corporation (0625); VIVUS, Inc. (6179); and Vivus Pharmaceuticals Limited (9329). The Debtors’ corporate headquarters and service address is 900 E. Hamilton Avenue, Suite 550, Campbell, CA 95008. 2 Contemporaneously herewith, the Debtors have filed the Motion of Debtors for Entry of Order (I) Authorizing Debtors to Redact Certain Personal Identification Information in Creditor Matrix and Certain Other Documents and (II) Granting Related Relief. RLF1 23325296v.1 Case 20-11779-LSS Doc 55 Filed 07/09/20 Page 2 of 19 Dated: July 9, 2020 Wilmington, Delaware /s/ Sarah E. Silveira RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, P.A. Mark D.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California
    BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Rulemaking Regarding Policies and Protocols for Demand Response, Load Impact Estimates, Cost-Effectiveness Rulemaking 07-01-041 Methodologies, Megawatt Goals and (January 25, 2007) Alignment with California Independent System Operator Protocols RESPONSE OF THE CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR TO CLECA MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF THE REVISED IOU’S STRAW PROPOSAL FOR DEMAND RESPONSE COST EFFECTIVENESS I. Introduction The California Independent System Operator Corporation (“CAISO”) submits this response to the motion of the California Large Energy Consumers Association (“CLECA”) to strike portions of the Revised IOU Straw Proposal for Demand Response Cost Effectiveness. CLECA has made this motion in the alternative to CLECA’s request for evidentiary hearings regarding three issues for which CLECA believes there are factual disputes. The CAISO’s response is prompted by the second factual issue raised by CLECA: 2. The proposed requirement that only DR programs qualifying for resource adequacy (RA) status be treated as avoiding capacity costs. In support of its request for hearings and/or motion to strike for this issue, CLECA purports to characterize certain positions of the CAISO regarding the valuation of Demand Response resources. The CAISO feels that CLECA has mischaracterized, somewhat, the CAISO’s position on the subject, and so the CAISO files these comments to clarify the record as to the CAISO’s position. R.07-01-041 CAISO RESPONSE TO CLECA MOTION TO STRIKE RE IOU CE STRAW PROPOSAL We note that the Commission’s recent Order Instituting Rulemaking 07-09-008 (issued September 25, 2007) articulated the foundational steps in determining when evidentiary hearings are necessary: Parties who believe that evidentiary hearings are necessary shall follow the procedure set forth below.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013-00985C3340.Pdf
    SERVICE LIST JCCP 4765 ADDRESS PARTY Trenton H. Norris ABACO Partners LLC; Commonwealth Sarah Esmaili Soap & Toiletries, Inc.; E.T. Browne Arnold & Porter LLP Drug Company, Inc.; Home & Body Three Embarcadero Center, 10th Floor Company, Inc.; Method Products, Inc. San Francisco, CA 94111 [email protected] [email protected] Kevin C. Mayer Added Extras LLC Crowell & Moring LLP 515 S. Flower Street, 40th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 [email protected] John E. Dittoe Advanced Healthcare Distributors, Reed Smith LLP L.L.C.; CVS Pharmacy, Inc. 101 Second Street, Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94105 [email protected] Paul H. Burleigh Alberto-Culver Company; TIGI Linea LeclairRyan, LLP Corp. 725 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 350 Los Angeles, CA 90017 [email protected] Bruce Nye Albertson’s, LLC; Raani Corporation; Barbara Adams SUPERVALU, Inc. Adams Nye Becht LLP 222 Kearny Street, Seventh Floor San Francisco, CA 94108 [email protected] [email protected] Jason L. Weisberg Archipelago, Inc. Roxborough Pomerance Nye & Adreani 5820 Canoga Avenue, Suite 250 Woodland Hills, CA 91367 [email protected] Sophia B. Belloli Aspire Brands; Bonne Bell, LLC Michael Van Zandt Hanson Bridgett LLP 425 Market Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 [email protected] Richard E. Haskin Awesome Products, Inc. Gibbs Giden Locher Turner Senet Wittbrodt LLP 1880 Century Park East, 12th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90067 [email protected] Robert A. Randick Barbera Studio, Inc. Randick O’Dea & Tooliatos, LLP 5000 Hopyard Road, Suite 225
    [Show full text]
  • Offering Memorandum Union Square | San Francisco
    OFFERING MEMORANDUM 166 GearyUNION SQUARE | SAN FRANCISCO A PRIDE-OF-OWNERSHIP COMMERCIAL ASSET ADJACENT TO SAN FRANCISCO’S FAMED UNION SQUARE 166 GEARY STREET exclusively listed by: Vincent Schwab Senior Managing Director Investments San Francisco Office [email protected] Cell: (415) 828-4372 Tel: (415) 625-2171 Fax: (415) 989-9220 UNION GLicense: CA 00840133 SQUARE SAN FRANCISCO CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT The information contained in the following Marketing Brochure is proprietary and strictly confidential. It is intended to be reviewed only by the party receiving it from Institutional Property Advisors, a Division of Marcus & Millichap (“IPA”) and should not be made available to any other person or entity without the written consent of IPA. This Marketing Brochure has been prepared to provide summary, unverified information to prospective purchasers, and to establish only a preliminary level of interest in the subject property. The information contained herein is not a substitute for a thorough due diligence investigation. IPA and Marcus & Millichap have not made any investigation, and make no warranty or representation, with respect to the income or expenses for the subject property, the future projected financial performance of the property, the size and square footage of the property and improvements, the presence or absence of contaminating substances, PCB’s or asbestos, the compliance with State and Federal regulations, the physical condition of the improvements thereon, or the financial condition or business prospects
    [Show full text]
  • BOMA Bulletin-Spring 2010
    SPRING 2010 www.bomasf.org BOMA San Francisco advances the commercial real estate industry through advocacy, professional development, and information exchange BOMA Membership An Investment in Local, State and National Advocacy for Commercial Real Estate would like to take this opportunity to issues, when the opportunity to influence thank you for renewing your decisions is greatest. Our local staff and On the Inside membership in BOMA San Francisco many members work closely with the paid for 2010. Your dues investment provides BOMA lobbyist in Sacramento. BOMA SF V ISITS DC our members with a variety of Ibenefits and services including BOMA International is a full- ••• 4 ••• luncheons, brown bag sessions, service trade association that seminars, social events, and advocates on behalf of our BOMA 360 opportunities to network with industry in Washington DC, professional colleagues and and provides a wide array of ••• 5 ••• expand your knowledge. Most educational programming for importantly, your investment commercial property YOUNG PROFESSIONALS and participation ensures practitioners. It is the only political advocacy on issues national real estate organization LEADERSHIP LUNCHEON affecting the regulations with a consistent and pro-active ••• 7 ••• governing our industry. presence in the various code Thomas Kruggel making bodies protecting your When assessing the value of a Hines interests. BOMA International is PAC AT THE PARK BOMA membership, we should also very active in the standard- ••• 8 ••• not overlook the portion of setting process and in bench- your dues that funds the activities of marking best practices, through vehicles TEXAS HOLD ’EM BOMA California and BOMA like the Experience and Exchange Report International.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Ethics Commission 2012 List of Registered Lobbyists with Employers/Clients (Emp/C) Sorted by Lobbyist Name
    TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION 2012 LIST OF REGISTERED LOBBYISTS WITH EMPLOYERS/CLIENTS (EMP/C) SORTED BY LOBBYIST NAME Lobbyist Lobbyist Mailing Address Telephone # Reporting Type Termination Date EMP/C EMP/C Address Comp. Type Comp. Level EMP/C Term. Date Aanstoos, Alice L. 6500 West Loop South # 5100 Bellaire, TX (713)567-7718 Monthly 12/31/2012 77401-3520 AT&T 208 S. Akard St. Dallas, TX 75202 Prospective $50,000 - $99,999.99 12/31/2012 Abel, Douglas Deane 1515 Hermann Dr. Houston, TX 77004-7126 (713)524-4267 Annual 12/31/2012 Harris County Medical Society 1515 Hermann Dr. Houston, TX 77004 Prospective Less Than $10,000.00 12/31/2012 Acevedo, Adrian G. 1001 Congress Avenue, Suite 400 Austin, TX (512)499-8085 Annual 12/31/2012 78701 Anadarko Petroleum Corporation 1201 Lake Robbins Drive The Woodlands, TX Prospective $50,000 - $99,999.99 12/31/2012 77380 Adair, Bobby Glenn 600 N. Dairy Ashford - 2WL 8024F Houston, (832)486-3395 Annual 12/31/2012 TX 77079 ConocoPhillips 600 N. Dairy Ashford Houston, TX 77079 Prospective $ 0.00 12/31/2012 Adams, Cynthia S. 2100 S IH 35 Suite 202 Austin, TX 78704 (512)692-1465 Annual 12/31/2012 Superior HeatlhPlan 2100 S IH 35 Suite 202 Austin, TX 78704 Prospective $10,000 - $24,999.99 12/31/2012 Page: 1 Texas Ethics Commission * (512) 463-5800 * www.ethics.state.tx.us Date Printed: 02/13/2013 Lobbyist Lobbyist Mailing Address Telephone # Reporting Type Termination Date EMP/C EMP/C Address Comp. Type Comp. Level EMP/C Term.
    [Show full text]
  • 400 Montgomery Street
    400 Montgomery Street For Lease | Retail Space | North Financial District - San Francisco, CA This exceptionally well-located Downtown retail availability sits at the base of the historic 400 Montgomery Street - a 75,000 SF office building at the cross streets of Montgomery and California. Don’t miss this rare opportunity to front one of the Financial District’s busiest streets. Premises 1,951 Rentable Square Feet 20,253 Cars Per Day on Montgomery Ideal for Fitness, Non-Cooking Food, Estimated 22 Million Pedestrians or Service Per Year Pass the Intersection of Montgomery and California 101 PEIR 39 1 AQUATIC PARK JEFFERSON ST TAYLOR ST POWELL ST JONES ST MARINA GREEN NORTH POINT ST M BEACH ST A MASON ST Y R CASA WAY A IN W A KEARNY ST O B R L I V MARINA BLVD RICO WAY T JEFFERSON ST D STOCKTON ST BRODERICK ST E R GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL WEBSTER ST FORT BAY ST RECREATION AREA MASON NORTH POINT ST BUCHANAN ST GRANT AVE C PRADO ST CERVANTES BLVD R JEFFERSON ST BEACH ST HYDE ST IS S Y BAKER ST FI POLK ST BAY ST FRANCISCO ST CHESTNUT ST ELD A BEACH ST V BEACH ST MONTGOMERY ST E AVILA ST NORTH POINT ST GOUGH ST LARKIN ST T DIVISADERO ST BAY ST CHESTNUT ST H 101 E SCOTT ST E FILLMORE ST LOMBARD ST M CAPRA WAY FRANKLIN ST BAY ST B NORTH POINT ST A T SANSOME ST T E R S M FRANCISCO ST L C E A A G A D R L LOMBARD ST R D V B L A O GREENWICH ST E L M A LEAVENWORTH ST P R R B BAY ST H COLUMBUS AVE H L C O A A OCTAVIA ST CHESTNUT ST H PIERCE ST AY L N W W IL D O L BLV LIN S O A D Y LOMBARD ST C H TAYLOR ST CO TOLE GREENWICH ST K N L E E I N FILBERT ST L
    [Show full text]
  • 2013-00985C3548.Pdf
    SERVICE LIST JCCP 4765 ADDRESS PARTY Robert A. Randick Barbera Studio, Inc. Randick O’Dea & Tooliatos, LLP 5000 Hopyard Road, Suite 225 Pleasanton, CA 94588 [email protected] Carol Brophy Big Lots, Inc.; Big Lots Stores, Inc. Jonathan Lee Sedgwick LLP 333 Bush Street, 30th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 [email protected] Jeffrey Margulies Bloomingdale’s, Inc.; Burlington Coat Factory William L. Troutman Warehouse Corporation; Dermstore LLC; Julie Glazer Marshalls of MA, Inc.; Marshalls of CA, LLC; Fulbright & Jaworksi LLP Nordstrom, Inc.; Ross Stores, Inc.; Target 555 South Flower Street, 41st Floor Corporation; The TJX Companies, Inc. Los Angeles, CA 90071 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Mark N. Todzo Center for Environmental Health Howard Hirsch Lexington Law Group 503 Divisadero Street San Francisco, CA 94117 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Ben D. Whitwell Colomer USA Inc. Jennifer Levin Venable LLP 2049 Century Park East, Suite 2100 Los Angeles, CA 90067 [email protected] [email protected] Michael R. O’Neil Crown Laboratories, Inc. Peter A. Austin Murphy Austin Adams Schoenfeld LLP 304 “S” Street Post Office Box 1319 Sacramento, CA 95812 [email protected] [email protected] Thomas H. Clarke, Jr. CSI Products, Inc.; Davion, Inc. Ropers, Majeski, Kohn & Bentley 75 Broadway, Suite 202 San Francisco, CA 94111 [email protected] [email protected] John E. Dittoe CVS Pharmacy, Inc. Reed Smith LLP 101 Second Street, Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94105 [email protected] Margaret Carew Toledo Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.; Dollar Tree Stacy E.
    [Show full text]
  • National Banks Active As of 7/31/2021
    National Banks Active As of 8/31/2021 CHARTER NO NAME ADDRESS (LOC) CITY STATE CERT RSSD 12072 First National Bank Alaska 101 West 36th Avenue Anchorage AK 16130 114260 10697 First National Bank and Trust 111 South Main Street Atmore AL 2779 670430 16708 Town-Country National Bank 118 Broad Street Camden AL 22621 180537 9681 The First National Bank of Dozier 7825 South Main Street Dozier AL 2794 496434 16579 First National Bank 341 Military Street South Hamilton AL 22271 330239 7592 The First National Bank of Hartford 101 South 3rd Avenue Hartford AL 2804 112332 16553 Commonwealth National Bank 2214 St. Stephens Road Mobile AL 22229 578237 10406 First National Bank of North Arkansas 305-307 Public Square Berryville AR 3854 864846 21165 The First National Bank of Izard County 2184 AR Highway 56 Calico Rock AR 11252 379649 13637 First National Bank of Eastern Arkansas 101 North Washington Street Forrest City AR 3863 251745 1950 The First National Bank of Fort Smith 602 Garrison Avenue Fort Smith AR 3864 397540 23202 The Malvern National Bank 1 Money Place Malvern AR 14644 906241 10004 First National Bank 200 West Court Street Paragould AR 3887 42448 14209 The First National Bank at Paris 11 East Main Street Paris AR 14534 45047 15482 Relyance Bank, National Association 912 South Poplar Street Pine Bluff AR 19371 49241 24573 Legacy National Bank 4055 West Sunset Springdale AR 57953 3306280 11312 The First National Bank of Lawrence County at Walnut Ridge 206 West Main Street Walnut Ridge AR 3896 799948 24224 BNC National Bank 20175 North
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Public Utilities Commission of the State Of
    BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION FILED OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 09/14/20 04:59 PM Order Instituting Rulemaking to Develop an R.16-02-007 Electricity Integrated Resource Planning (Filed February 11, 2016) Framework and to Coordinate and Refine Long- Term Procurement Planning Requirements. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have this day served a copy of COMMENTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE’S PROPOSED DECISION GRANTING THE CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY CHOICE ASSOCIATION’S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION on all known parties to R.16-02-007 by transmitting an electronic mail message with the document attached to each person named in the official service list. Executed on September 14, 2020 in Williamson, New York. s/ Sara Breckenridge SARA BRECKENRIDGE 1 / 35 9/14/2020 CPUC - Service Lists - R1602007 CPUC Home CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Service Lists PROCEEDING: R1602007 - CPUC - OIR TO DEVELO FILER: CPUC LIST NAME: LIST LAST CHANGED: SEPTEMBER 3, 2020 Download the Comma-delimited File About Comma-delimited Files Back to Service Lists Index Parties DAMON FRANZ DAVID LYONS DIR - POLICY & ELECTRICITY MARKETS ATTORNEY TESLA, INC. PAUL HASTINGS LLP EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 FOR: TESLA, INC. (FORMERLY: SOLARCITY FOR: LA PALOMA GENERATING COMPANY,LLC CORPORATION) JEFFREY KEHNE JOHN W. LESLIE, ESQ. CHIEF DEVELOPMENT OFFICE / GEN.COUNSEL ATTORNEY MEGELLAN WIND LLC DENTONS US LLP EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, DC 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 FOR: MAGELLAN WIND LLC FOR: SHELL ENERGY NORTH AMERICA (U.S.), L.P. MATTHEW FREEDMAN MERRIAN BORGESON STAFF ATTORNEY SR.
    [Show full text]
  • Company First Name Last Name #Smartcohort David Capelli #Smartcohort Carla Mays 10 Jennifer Walker 123 Contracting Michael Friedman 4083716800 Muhie Maaz A
    Company First Name Last Name #SmartCohort David Capelli #SmartCohort Carla Mays 10 Jennifer Walker 123 Contracting Michael Friedman 4083716800 Muhie Maaz A. Esteban & Company, Inc Alfonso C. Esteban A3GEO, Inc. Dona Mann Abtahi Engineering ManagementAfshin Consulting Abtahi Abundance Worldwide EnterprisesDollene Jones ACCIONA Fernando Vara ACCIONA Jesús García Acciona Luis Palazzi Acciona Jesus Garcia Acciona Fernando Vara ACCIONA Luis Palazzi ACCIONA CONSTRUCTION FERNANDO VARA ORTIZ DE LA TORRE Acciona Infrastructure North AmericaRafael Sanchez Achievement Engineering Corp. Arash Firouzjaei ActiveWayz Engineering Constance Farris ActiveWayz Engineering Admas Zewdie Acumen Building Enterprise Inc. Gian Fiero Acumen Building Enterprise Inc. Robert Pilgrim ADA Takuya Nagai Adelaide Strategies marvin williams ADKO Engineering, Inc. President Kanaan Advantage Supply David Ibanez Doria AECOM Mel Sears AECOM nasri munfah AECOM Paul Nicholas AECOM Paul Boddie AECOM Emile Jilwan AECOM Russel Rudden AECOM Jon Porterfield AerialZeus, LLC Luis Robles Aero-Environmental Consulting, JorgeINC. Vizcaino All Trade Coordinators, Inc. Thelma King Ally Rail Consutling Douglas Deming Alpine Rail Group Buzz Berger ALSTOM Transportation Inc. Muriel LUO Anrak Corporation Mark Hamilton ANTHONIO, INC. TONY OGBEIDE Apadana Engineering, Inc. sopida siadat Aptim Environmental & Infrastructure,Rob LLC Delnagro Arad Adam Rad Arcadis U.S., Inc. Girish Kripalani Arora Engineers, Inc. Adam Oliver Arup Orion Fulton Arup North America LTD Luis Piek ASC Rahul Vaishnav ASC Henry Adley ASC Lorda Rumbaua ASC Dots Oyenuga ASC Dots Oyenuga Assurant Innovations Takeo Kimura Atkins Sergio Callen ATKINSON CONSTRUCTION ROHIT SHETTY Auriga Corporation Thomas Gibson Auriga Corporation Parkash Daryani Azad Engineering PC Mahsa Azad A-Zone Environmental Services, LLCMike Bruzzesi AZTEC/TYPSA Karim Dada AZTEC/TYPSA Carlos Tarazaga BabEng LLC Rene Reichl Badger Dalighting Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • April 25, 2008 Comments on the ALJ Ruling on Cost
    BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Rulemaking Regarding Policies and Protocols for Demand Response, Load Impact Estimates, Cost-Effectiveness Rulemaking 07-01-041 Methodologies, Megawatt Goals and (January 25, 2007) Alignment with California Independent System Operator Market Design Protocols COMMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR ON THE ALJ RULING REGARDING THE COST EFFECTIVENESS FRAMEWORK The California Independent System Operator Corporation (“CAISO”) submits its comments regarding the ALJ’s Ruling re Comments on the Cost Effectiveness Framework, dated April 4, 2008, (“Ruling”) and Attachment A to the Ruling, “Draft Demand Response Cost Effectiveness Protocols” (“Staff Protocols”). Introduction As the Ruling states, the methodology set forth in the Staff Protocols is based largely upon the Cost Effectiveness Framework (aka Consensus Parties Framework) that the Joint Parties submitted in this proceeding in November 2007. (Ruling at pp. 1-2.) The Ruling further notes that party comments should address “the completeness, accuracy, and feasibility of the staff proposal.” (Ruling at p. 2.). The CAISO’s comments herein are intended either (1) to raise points for further refinement of the protocol’s interim methodologies or (2) to raise points that the CAISO believes should be included within the document, so that they are “teed up” for consideration when the - 1 - R.07-01-041 CAISO COMMENTS ON DRAFT DR CE PROTOCOLS protocols are revised with reformulated criteria intended to replace the interim methodologies1. Overall, the CAISO considers the Staff Protocols to be a sound basis for interim review of DR programs that will be presented to the Commission in 2009 for the procurement cycle period of 2009 to 2011.
    [Show full text]