DOCSLIB.ORG

Parlamentul European 2014-2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Parlamentul European 2014-2019 Parlamentul European 2014-2019 Comisia pentru ocuparea forței de muncă și afaceri sociale EMPL_PV(2017)0515_1 PROCES-VERBAL Reuniunea din 15 mai 2017, 19.30-20.30 STRASBOURG Reuniunea a fost deschisă luni, 15 mai 2017, la ora 19.35, fiind prezidată de Marita Ulvskog (vicepreședintă). 1. Adoptarea ordinii de zi Ordinea de zi a fost adoptată în forma indicată în prezentul proces-verbal. 2. Comunicări ale președinției 2.1 S-a oferit interpretare pentru toate limbile, cu excepția limbilor malteză, daneză (a fost disponibilă doar în mod pasiv), croată și irlandeză. *** Votare electronică *** 3. Normele financiare aplicabile bugetului general al Uniunii EMPL/8/07922 ***I 2016/0282(COD) COM(2016)0605 – C8-0372/2016 Raportor Jérôme Lavrilleux (PPE) PA – PE599.609v01-00 pentru aviz: AM – PE601.227v01-00 Fond: BUDG, Richard Ashworth (ECR) PR – PE601.115v01-00 CONT* – Ingeborg Gräßle (PPE) AM – PE603.035v01-00 AM – PE603.011v01-00 Adoptarea proiectului de aviz Termen de depunere a amendamentelor: 28 martie 2017, ora 12.00 Decizie: Proiectul de aviz a fost adoptat cu 41 de voturi pentru, 3 voturi împotrivă și 8 abțineri (a se vedea rezultatele votului în anexa II, precum și rezultatele votului prin apel nominal în anexa I). *** Sfârșitul votării electronice *** 4. Reuniuni următoare PV\1131050RO.docx PE608.088v01-00 RO Unită în diversitate RO 29-30 mai 2017 (Bruxelles) Reuniunea a fost închisă la ora 19.45. PE608.088v01-00 2/14 PV\1131050RO.docx RO ANNEX I Results of roll-call votes Contents 1. Financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union, 2016/0282 (COD), Rapp. Jérôme Lavrilleux...................................................................................................................4 1.1. Final vote..............................................................................................................4 Key to symbols: + : in favour - : against 0 : abstention PV\1131050RO.docx 3/14 PE608.088v01-00 RO 1. Financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union, 2016/0282 (COD), Rapp. Jérôme Lavrilleux 1.1. Final vote 41 + Enrique Calvet Chambon, Martina Dlabajová, Marian Harkin, Robert Rochefort, Jasenko Selimovic, Yana ALDE Toom ECR Amjad Bashir, Czesław Hoc, Helga Stevens, Jana Žitňanská PPE Michèle Alliot-Marie, David Casa, Krzysztof Hetman, Marc Joulaud, Agnieszka Kozłowska-Rajewicz, Ádám Kósa, Jérôme Lavrilleux, Verónica Lope Fontagné, Thomas Mann, Sofia Ribeiro, Claude Rolin, Anne Sander, Sven Schulze, Romana Tomc, Tom Vandenkendelaere S&D Maria Arena, Guillaume Balas, Brando Benifei, Ole Christensen, Elena Gentile, Agnes Jongerius, Jan Keller, Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Javi López, Edouard Martin, Emilian Pavel, Georgi Pirinski, Marita Ulvskog VERTS/ALE Jean Lambert, Terry Reintke, Monika Vana 3 - ENF Dominique Martin, Joëlle Mélin NI Lampros Fountoulis 8 0 EFDD Tiziana Beghin, Rosa D'Amato ENF Mara Bizzotto GUE/NGL Rina Ronja Kari, Kostadinka Kuneva, Patrick Le Hyaric, Paloma López Bermejo, Neoklis Sylikiotis PE608.088v01-00 4/14 PV\1131050RO.docx RO ANNEX II DRAFT opinion on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and amending Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002, Regulations (EU) No 1296/2013, (EU) No 1301/2013, (EU) No 1303/2013, EU No 1304/2013, (EU) No 1305/2013, (EU) No 1306/2013, (EU) No 1307/2013, (EU) No 1308/2013, (EU) No 1309/2013, (EU) No 1316/2013, (EU) No 223/2014, (EU) No 283/2014 and (EU) No 652/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Decision No 541/2014/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council Rapporteur: Jérôme Lavrilleux (EPP) Voting List Concerned text AM Tabled by Remarks Vote Article 2 – paragraph Georgi Pirinski, Jutta AM 20 + 1 – point 27 Steinruck Article 54 – AM 21 Monika Vana + paragraph 3 AM 22 Monika Vana Article 62 – Georgi Pirinski, Deletion. Identical + paragraph 9 AM 23 Constanze Krehl, Jutta AMs - vote together 24/22/0 Steinruck Georgi Pirinski, AM 24 Constanze Krehl, Jutta Deletion. Identical + Article 125 Steinruck AMs - vote together 23/22/0 AM 25 Monika Vana Article 175 – AM 26 Monika Vana + paragraph 8 Article 186 – AM 27 Monika Vana + paragraph 4 Article 201 – COMP EPP, S&D, GUE/NGL, Replaces AMs 28 + paragraph 3 5 Greens/EFA and 29 Georgi Pirinski, Jutta Falls if COMP 5 AM 28 F Article 201 – Steinruck adopted paragraph 3 Falls if COMP 5 or AM 29 Monika Vana F AM 28 adopted Article 208 – COMP EPP, S&D, GUE/NGL, Replaces AMs 30 paragraph 2 – + 6 Greens/EFA and 31 subparagraph 2 Georgi Pirinski, Jutta Deletion. Falls if Article 208 – AM 30 F Steinruck COMP 6 adopted paragraph 2 – Falls if COMP 6 or subparagraph 2 AM 31 Monika Vana F AM 30 adopted Georgi Pirinski, Jutta + Article 210 AM 32 Deletion Steinruck 25/21/0 Article 263 Regulation 1296/2013 (EaSI) Article 263 – COMP EPP, S&D, Greens/EFA Deletion. Replaces + PV\1131050RO.docx 5/14 PE608.088v01-00 RO Concerned text AM Tabled by Remarks Vote paragraph 1 – point 3 AMs 1, 33, 34 1 Article 5 – paragraph 2 Article 263 – Georgi Pirinski, Jutta Deletion. Identical AM 33 paragraph 1 – point 1 Steinruck AMs - vote F Article 5 – paragraph together. Falls if AM 34 Monika Vana 2 COMP 3 adopted Article 263 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Falls if COMP 3 or AM 1 Jérôme Lavrilleux F Article 5 – paragraph AMs 33/34 adopted 2 Article 263 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Falls if COMP 3 or AM 35 Jasenko Selimovic F Article 5 – paragraph AMs 33/34 adopted 2 – point a Article 263 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Falls if COMP 3 or AM 36 Jasenko Selimovic F Article 5 – paragraph AMs 33/34 adopted 2 – point b Article 263 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Falls if COMP 3 or AM 37 Jasenko Selimovic F Article 5 – paragraph AMs 33/34 adopted 2 – point c Article 263 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new) AM 2 Jérôme Lavrilleux + Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new) Comp 1 replaces AMs 3, 7, 15, COMP EPP, S&D, ALDE, Recital 199a (new) turning three AMs + 1 Greens/EFA to Articles into one recital Article 263 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Falls if COMP 1 b (new) AM 3 Jérôme Lavrilleux F adopted Article 5 – paragraph +2 b (new) Article 266 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point -a (new) Falls if COMP 1 Article 14 – AM 7 Jérôme Lavrilleux F adopted paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new) Article 273 – Falls if COMP 1 AM 15 Jérôme Lavrilleux F paragraph 1 – point 2 adopted PE608.088v01-00 6/14 PV\1131050RO.docx RO Concerned text AM Tabled by Remarks Vote a (new) Article 25 – paragraph 5 a (new) Article 263 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Article 14 – paragraph 1 and 2 Article 263 – Replaces AMs 4, 5, COMP paragraph 1 – point EPP, S&D, ALDE 6, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, + 4 4b 43, 44, 46 Article 32 Article 263 – paragraph 1 – point 5b Article 34 Article 263 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Georgi Pirinski, Jutta Deletion. Falls if Article 14 – AM 38 F Steinruck COMP 4 adopted paragraph 1 and paragraph 2 Article 263 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Deletion. Falls if – point a AM 39 Monika Vana COMP 4 or AM 38 F Article 14 – adopted. Paragraph 1 Article 263 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Falls if COMP 4 – point a a (new) AM 4 Jérôme Lavrilleux F adopted Article 14 – paragraph 1 a (new) AM 40 Monika Vana Deletion. Identical Article 263 – AMs - vote paragraph 1 – point 3 Georgi Pirinski, Jutta F AM 41 together. Fall if Article 19 Steinruck COMP 4 adopted Article 263 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Falls if COMP 4 AM 5 Jérôme Lavrilleux F Article 19 – adopted paragraph 1 a (new) Georgi Pirinski, Jutta Deletion. Identical Article 263 – AM 42 Steinruck AMs - vote paragraph 1 – point 4 F together. Fall if Article 25 AM 43 Monika Vana COMP 4 adopted Article 263 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Falls if COMP 4 AM 6 Jérôme Lavrilleux F Article 25 – adopted paragraph 1 a (new) Article 263 – AM 44 Georgi Pirinski, Jutta Falls if COMP 4 F PV\1131050RO.docx 7/14 PE608.088v01-00 RO Concerned text AM Tabled by Remarks Vote paragraph 1 – point 4 Steinruck adopted b (new) Article 32 Article 263 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Falls if COMP 4 Georgi Pirinski, Jutta b (new) AM 46 adopted or AM 44 F Steinruck Article 34 – REJECTED paragraphs 2, 3 and 5 Article 263 – paragraph 1 – point COMP EPP, S&D, ALDE, Replaces AM 45 + 5 8 Greens/EFA Article 33 Article 263 – Georgi Pirinski, Jutta Deletion. Falls if paragraph 1 – point 5 AM 45 F Steinruck COMP 8 adopted Article 33 Regulation 1303/2013 (Common Article 265 Provisions) Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 6 AM 47 Monika Vana Article 30a new Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point AM 48 Monika Vana 13 Article 39a new Article 266 Regulation 1304/2013 (ESF) Article 266 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Czeslaw Hoc, Tomasz Article 13 – AM 49 Piotr Poreba, Slawomir + paragraph 2 – new Klosowski subparagraph Article 266 – AM 50 Monika Vana Deletion. Identical + paragraph 1 – point 2 Georgi Pirinski, Jutta AM 51 AMs - vote together 27/23/0 Article 14 Steinruck Article 266 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a a (new) Article 14 – AM 8 Jérôme Lavrilleux + paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 a (new) Article 266 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a a (new) AM 9 Jérôme Lavrilleux + Article 14 – paragraph 3 Article 266 – AM 10 Jérôme Lavrilleux + paragraph 1 – point 2 PE608.088v01-00 8/14 PV\1131050RO.docx RO Concerned text AM Tabled by Remarks Vote – point a b (new) Article 14 – paragraph 3 a (new) AM 52 Monika Vana AM 53 Jutta Steinruck Article 266 – Thomas Mann, Joachim paragraph 1 – point 3 AM 54 Zeller Deletion. Identical Annex 1 – paragraph + AMs - vote together (1) – subparagraph 4 Ingeborg Gräßle, Sven Schulze, Thomas Mann, – indent 3 AM 55 Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Elmar Brok AM 56 Jutta Steinruck Ingeborg Gräßle, Sven Article 266 – Schulze, Thomas Mann, paragraph 1 – point 3 AM 57 Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Deletion.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • European Parliament: 7Th February 2017 Redistribution of Political Balance
    POLICY PAPER European issues n°420 European Parliament: 7th February 2017 redistribution of political balance Charles de Marcilly François Frigot At the mid-term of the 8th legislature, the European Parliament, in office since the elections of May 2014, is implementing a traditional “distribution” of posts of responsibility. Article 19 of the internal regulation stipulates that the Chairs of the parliamentary committees, the Deputy-Chairs, as well as the questeurs, hold their mandates for a renewable 2 and a-half year period. Moreover, internal elections within the political groups have supported their Chairs, whilst we note that there has been some slight rebalancing in terms of the coordinators’ posts. Although Italian citizens draw specific attention with the two main candidates in the battle for the top post, we should note other appointments if we are to understand the careful balance between nationalities, political groups and individual experience of the European members of Parliament. A TUMULTUOUS PRESIDENTIAL provide collective impetus to potential hesitations on the part of the Member States. In spite of the victory of the European People’s Party (EPP) in the European elections, it supported Martin As a result the election of the new President of Schulz in July 2104 who stood for a second mandate as Parliament was a lively[1] affair: the EPP candidate – President of the Parliament. In all, with the support of the Antonio Tajani – and S&D Gianni Pittella were running Liberals (ADLE), Martin Schulz won 409 votes following neck and neck in the fourth round of the relative an agreement concluded by the “grand coalition” after majority of the votes cast[2].
    [Show full text]
  • Association of Accredited Lobbyists to the European Parliament
    ASSOCIATION OF ACCREDITED LOBBYISTS TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT OVERVIEW OF EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT FORUMS AALEP Secretariat Date: October 2007 Avenue Milcamps 19 B-1030 Brussels Tel: 32 2 735 93 39 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.lobby-network.eu TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction………………………………………………………………..3 Executive Summary……………………………………………………….4-7 1. European Energy Forum (EEF)………………………………………..8-16 2. European Internet Forum (EIF)………………………………………..17-27 3. European Parliament Ceramics Forum (EPCF………………………...28-29 4. European Parliamentary Financial Services Forum (EPFSF)…………30-36 5. European Parliament Life Sciences Circle (ELSC)……………………37 6. Forum for Automobile and Society (FAS)…………………………….38-43 7. Forum for the Future of Nuclear Energy (FFNE)……………………..44 8. Forum in the European Parliament for Construction (FOCOPE)……..45-46 9. Pharmaceutical Forum…………………………………………………48-60 10.The Kangaroo Group…………………………………………………..61-70 11.Transatlantic Policy Network (TPN)…………………………………..71-79 Conclusions………………………………………………………………..80 Index of Listed Companies………………………………………………..81-90 Index of Listed MEPs……………………………………………………..91-96 Most Active MEPs participating in Business Forums…………………….97 2 INTRODUCTION Businessmen long for certainty. They long to know what the decision-makers are thinking, so they can plan ahead. They yearn to be in the loop, to have the drop on things. It is the genius of the lobbyists and the consultants to understand this need, and to satisfy it in the most imaginative way. Business forums are vehicles for forging links and maintain a dialogue with business, industrial and trade organisations. They allow the discussions of general and pre-legislative issues in a different context from lobbying contacts about specific matters. They provide an opportunity to get Members of the European Parliament and other decision-makers from the European institutions together with various business sectors.
    [Show full text]
  • Xm Xm Amendments
    European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Constitutional Affairs 2016/2114(REG) 27.9.2016 AMENDMENTS 1079 - 1283 Draft report Richard Corbett (PE585.606v02-00) General Revision of Parliament's Rules of Procedure (2016/2114(REG)) Document 1: AM 863-1078 (PE 589.403) Document 2: AM 1079-1283 (PE 589.433) AM\1105232XM.docx PE589.433v01-00 XM United in diversity XM AM_Com_RulesReport PE589.433v01-00 2/114 AM\1105232XM.docx XM Amendment 1079 João Ferreira Parliament's Rules of Procedure Rule 150 – paragraph 2 Present text Amendment 2. Os pontos inscritos no projeto 2. Os pontos inscritos no projeto definitivo de ordem do dia para votação definitivo de ordem do dia para votação sem alterações também não serão objeto de sem alterações também não serão objeto de debate, a menos que o Parlamento, ao debate, a menos que o Parlamento, ao aprovar a sua ordem do dia no início de um aprovar a sua ordem do dia no início de um período de sessões, decida em contrário período de sessões, decida em contrário sob proposta da Conferência dos sob proposta da Conferência dos Presidentes, ou a pedido de um grupo Presidentes, ou a pedido de um grupo político ou de um mínimo de 40 deputados. político ou de um mínimo de 25 deputados. Or. pt Amendment 1080 João Ferreira Parliament's Rules of Procedure Rule 150 – paragraph 3 Present text Amendment 3. Aquando da elaboração do projeto 3. Aquando da elaboração do projeto definitivo de ordem do dia de um período definitivo de ordem do dia de um período de sessões, a Conferência dos Presidentes de sessões, a Conferência dos Presidentes poderá propor que sejam inscritos outros poderá propor que sejam inscritos outros pontos sem alterações ou sem debate.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix to Memorandum of Law on Behalf of United
    APPENDIX TO MEMORANDUM OF LAW ON BEHALF OF UNITED KINGDOM AND EUROPEAN PARLIAMENTARIANS AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION LIST OF AMICI HOUSES OF PARLIAMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND AND MEMBERS OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT House of Lords The Lord Ahmed The Lord Alderdice The Lord Alton of Liverpool, CB The Rt Hon the Lord Archer of Sandwell, QC PC The Lord Avebury The Lord Berkeley, OBE The Lord Bhatia, OBE The Viscount Bledisloe, QC The Baroness Bonham-Carter of Yarnbury The Rt Hon the Baroness Boothroyd, OM PC The Lord Borrie, QC The Rt Hon the Baroness Bottomley of Nettlestone, DL PC The Lord Bowness, CBE DL The Lord Brennan, QC The Lord Bridges, GCMG The Rt Hon the Lord Brittan of Spennithorne, QC DL PC The Rt Hon the Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville, CH PC The Viscount Brookeborough, DL The Rt Hon the Lord Browne-Wilkinson, PC The Lord Campbell of Alloway, ERD QC The Lord Cameron of Dillington The Rt Hon the Lord Cameron of Lochbroom, QC The Rt Rev and Rt Hon the Lord Carey of Clifton, PC The Lord Carlile of Berriew, QC The Baroness Chapman The Lord Chidgey The Lord Clarke of Hampstead, CBE The Lord Clement-Jones, CBE The Rt Hon the Lord Clinton-Davis, PC The Lord Cobbold, DL The Lord Corbett of Castle Vale The Rt Hon the Baroness Corston, PC The Lord Dahrendorf, KBE The Lord Dholakia, OBE DL The Lord Donoughue The Baroness D’Souza, CMG The Lord Dykes The Viscount Falkland The Baroness Falkner of Margravine The Lord Faulkner of Worcester The Rt Hon the
    [Show full text]
  • SPD- Koordinatoren Gewählt
    Fraktion der Progressiven Allianz der Sozialisten & Demokraten im Europäischen Parlament SPD-Abgeordnete im Europäischen Parlament Herausgeber: Bernhard Rapkay MdEP (V. i. S. d. P.) www.spd-europa.de EP / Wahl der Koordinatoren in der S&D-Fraktion Brüssel, 02.09.2009 PRESSEMITTEILUNG SPD-Europaabgeordnete besetzen wichtige Posten Sozialdemokratische Fraktion im Europäischen Parlament wählt Sprecherinnen und Sprecher der Ausschüsse Die sozialdemokratischen Abgeordneten im Europäischen Parlament haben diese Woche ihre Koordinatorinnen und Koordinatoren in den jeweiligen Ausschüssen für diese Legislaturperiode gewählt. Die SPD-Abgeordneten besetzen sechsmal diese verantwortungsvolle und einflussreiche Funktion und sind damit auch innerhalb der eigenen Fraktion stark vertreten. Als Koordinatoren vertreten sie die Interessen der europäischen Sozialdemokraten gegenüber den anderen Fraktionen im Europäischen Parlament, der EU- Kommission und dem Ministerrat. Ihre Funktion ist vergleichbar mit der des Sprechers im Deutschen Bundestag. Im Folgenden sind die neuen Koordinatorinnen und Koordinatoren, die sich aus der SPD-Delegation rekrutieren, aufgeführt: 1. Udo BULLMANN – Koordinator im Ausschuss für Wirtschaft und Währung 2. Jens GEIER – Koordinator im Ausschuss für Haushaltskontrolle 3. Evelyne GEBHARDT – Koordinatorin im Ausschuss für Binnenmarkt und Verbraucherschutz (Wiederwahl) 4. Constanze KREHL – Koordinatorin im Ausschuss für Regionale Entwicklung (Wiederwahl) 5. Bernhard RAPKAY – Koordinator im Rechtsausschuss 6. Ulrike RODUST – Koordinatorin
    [Show full text]
  • Verabschiedung Der Kollegiatinnen Und Kollegiaten Der Früheren Kurse Manöverkritik, Ausblick Auf Die Nächsten Kurswochen Univ
    Programm der 1. Kurswoche FKS XII 15. – 19.2.2016 Schwerpunkt: Führung Tagungsort: Uni Speyer, Hörsäle 1, 2, 4 und 5 Freiherr–vom-Stein-Str. 2 Unterbringung: Gästehaus Otto-Mayer-Straße 16 Sonntag, 14.2.2016 18.00 – 23.00 Uhr Anreise: Bitte direkt am Empfang des Gästehauses Otto-Mayer- Straße wegen Schlüsselübergabe melden Montag, 15.2.2016 Tagungsort: Hörsaal 1 Hauptgebäude Uni-Speyer Zugang über Haupteingang Freiherr-vom-Stein-Straße 9.00 – 12.00 Uhr Begrüßung, Vorstellung der Teilnehmer, Einführung in das Kursprogramm Univ.-Prof. Dr. Hermann Hill, Wissenschaftlicher Beauftragter des FKS XII 13.00 – 17.00 Uhr Führung der eigenen Person (mit Vorstellung der Fragebögen zum multidirektionalen Feedback zur Führung und Zusammenarbeit) em. Univ.-Prof. Dr. Rudolf Fisch, Speyer/Konstanz 18.30 – 20.00 Uhr Feierliche Eröffnung des FKS XII in der Aula der Universität Speyer Festvortrag: „Öffentlicher Dienst und die Gestaltung der Zukunft“. Günter Kern, Staatsekretär, Ministerium des Innern, für Sport und Infrastruktur des Landes Rheinland-Pfalz, Mainz - siehe gesondertes Programm- - Anschließend kleiner Empfang im Foyer der Universität Speyer - - 2 - Dienstag, 16.2.2016 Tagungsort: Hörsaal 1, Hauptgebäude Uni-Speyer Zugang über Haupteingang Freiherr-vom-Stein-Straße 9.00 – 17.00 Uhr Kennenlernen der TeilnehmerInnen und ihrer Arbeitsbereiche in wechselnden kleinen Gruppen, Grundlagen der Zusammenarbeit Einführung und Moderation: Prof. Dr. Yvette Völschow, Universität Vechta Mittwoch, 17.2.2016 Tagungsort: Hörsaal 1, Hauptgebäude Uni-Speyer Zugang
    [Show full text]
  • 16Th Inter-Parliamentary Meeting Between the European Parliament and the National Assembly of the Republic of Korea
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2009 - 2014 Delegation for relations with the Korean Peninsula 16th Inter-parliamentary Meeting between the European Parliament and the National Assembly of the Republic of Korea 10 January 2013 Brussels A delegation from the National Assembly of the Republic of Korea visited the European Parliament in Brussels on 10 January 2013 on the occasion of the 16th inter-parliamentary meeting between both Assemblies. The South Korean delegation was led by Mrs LEE Meekyung, Chairman of the Delegation for Relations with the European Union in the National Assembly (Democratic United Party). The European Parliament's Delegation for Relations with the Korean Peninsula is chaired by Mr Herbert REUL (Germany, EPP). This inter-parliamentary meeting was dedicated to four main issues: key political and economic developments in Korea and the EU, the situation on the Korean Peninsula and inter-Korean relations, and the development of the EU-Korea Strategic Partnership. The previous inter-parliamentary meeting took place in November 2011 in Seoul. Due to the parliamentary elections in April 2012 and the presidential elections in December 2012, no inter-parliamentary meeting took place that year. The Korean delegation also met with the Chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee, Mr Elmar Brok, the Chairman of the International Trade Committee, Mr Vital Moreira, and was received by Vice-President Georgios Papastamkos. Meeting with Mr Elmar Brok, Chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee Mr Brok welcomed the Korean delegation to the European Parliament on the occasion of the first inter-parliamentary meeting following the April 2012 parliamentary elections in Korea. He underlined that the Republic of Korea is a very close partner of the European Union in Asia and a very active member of the international community.
    [Show full text]
  • Cohesion Policy
    PANORAMASUMMER 2018 / No. 65 MAKING EUROPE SMARTER AND GREENER POST-2020 GOOD GOVERNANCE FOR COHESION POLICY Cohesion Policy: powering ahead to a smarter future Regional and Urban Policy SUMMER 2018 / No. 65 PANORAMA In this issue … October. We also explore a variety of cultural heritage pro- jects supported by the ERDF, to celebrate the European Year The summer issue of Panorama magazine, looks to the future of Cultural Heritage, and our Captured on Camera section and considers the European Commission’s proposed budget highlights innovation in Poland. We report on the recent for the 2021-2027 funding period. As well as an introductory good governance conference, look at the variety of initia- article presenting the proposals and how they hope to reform tives helping administrative capacity-building across the Cohesion Policy, we have an exclusive interview with Commis- EU, and follow the continuing adventures of our young Euro- sioner Creţu outlining the main developments and their rea- pean social media stars crossing the continent as part of soning, and we feature initial reactions from a variety of the EU Road Trip project. The projects section visits Italy, stakeholders across Europe. France and Bulgaria. Our focus this time is on Ireland, which is currently celebrating 45 years of EU membership. In an interview with Minister for Public Expenditure Paschal Donohoe, and through a selection of projects, we show how ERDF funding has helped Ireland become more innovative and competitive. We reveal the 21 finalists for this year’s RegioStars awards, AGNÈS MONFRET and preview the themes and details of the next European Head of Communication Unit, Directorate-General Week of Regions and Cities, taking place in Brussels in early for Regional and Urban Policy, European Commission Cover picture: Professor Valeria Nicolosi © Trinity College Dublin 04 28 32 44 EDITORIAL ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Europa Stärken Heißt Deutschland Stärken! Deutschland Heißt Stärken Europa
    Europa stärken heißt Deutschland stärken! Deutschland heißt stärken Europa 1 2 Europa stärken heißt Deutschland stärken Die europäische Politik steht heute mehr denn je im Zentrum des öffentlichen Interesses in Deutschland. Die großen Herausforderungen unserer Zeit – die kriegeri- schen Konflikte in unseren Nachbarregionen, die Migra- tionsbewegungen und der Kampf gegen Islamismus und Terrorismus – lassen sich nicht mehr national lösen. Nur gemeinsam mit unseren europäischen Partnern können wir tragfähige Lösungen erarbeiten und die Errungenschaften der europäischen Einigung – Frieden, Freiheit, Sicherheit und wirtschaftlicher Wohlstand – erhalten. Das Auftreten populistischer, europafeindlicher Parteien und der von Großbritannien angestrebte Austritt aus der EU dürfen nicht darüber hinwegtäuschen, dass die überwältigende Mehrheit der Deutschen wie der Euro- päer von der Notwendigkeit der europäischen Einigung überzeugt ist. Dieses Vertrauen gilt es durch sachge- rechte politische Lösungen auf allen Ebenen zu stärken. Wir arbeiten daher nachhaltig für sichere EU-Außen- grenzen, eine dauerhafte Reduktion der Migrations- ströme nach Europa, eine stabile europäische Währung, solide Staatshaushalte, einen funktionierenden Binnen- markt, Wirtschaftswachstum und Arbeitsplätze, innere und äußere Sicherheit sowie die Bewahrung der Schöp- fung. All dies können wir nur gemeinsam mit unseren europäischen Partnern erreichen und dauerhaft sichern, im Interesse Deutschlands und Europas! Diese Broschüre bietet Ihnen einen Überblick über die Arbeit und
    [Show full text]
  • Europe's Resource Grab Vested Interests at Work in the European Parliament
    Europe's Resource Grab Vested interests at work in the European Parliament Corporate Europe Observatory, 27 June 2011 On 30 June, the European Parliament’s industry, energy and research committee (ITRE) is due to vote on the EU’s Raw Materials Initiative, establishing guidelines for Europe's future policy on natural resource use. The Parliament’s report could effectively give the green light to mining in protected European nature reserves as well as a resource grab in Asia, Africa, the Americas and the Arctic. The vote follows fierce calls from a number of MEPs with close links to industry for European big business to be allowed to exploit other countries’ raw materials without any restrictions – via trade, development and even military policies. MEPs have also tried to block strong language in the report on the need to stop corporate abuse in the extraction sector and to reduce Europe’s over- consumption of raw materials. Several of the MEPs pushing this aggressive agenda are from the European People’s Party (EPP) and have close links to industry sectors which have a vested interest in the raw materials debate (Bendt Bendtsen – Denmark; Herbert Reul and Daniel Caspary – Germany). Others such as Paul Rübig MEP (EPP, Austria) seem to have clear conflicts of interest1. Rübig profits from companies which depend heavily on the access to cheap raw materials. He also has close connections with industry lobby groups which have tried to shape the EU’s Raw Materials Initiative. Nonetheless, Rübig is one of the lead persons in the debate in Parliament and has set up a cross-party group of MEPs, the European Raw Materials Group, which will follow the issue, working closely with a parallel industry group.
    [Show full text]
  • Amendment 171 Dieter-Lebrecht Koch Daniel Caspary Georges
    27.6.2018 A8-0206/171 Amendment 171 Dieter-Lebrecht Koch Daniel Caspary Georges Bach Joachim Zeller Werner Kuhn Sven Schulze Thomas Mann Peter Liese David McAllister Norbert Lins Peter Jahr Sabine Verheyen Angelika Niebler Axel Voss Albert Deß Birgit Collin-Langen Christian Ehler Pascal Arimont Hermann Winkler Reimer Böge Jens Gieseke Elmar Brok Ivo Belet Tom Vandenkendelaere Markus Pieper Monika Hohlmeier Ingeborg Gräßle Markus Ferber Esther de Lange Elisabetta Gardini Massimiliano Salini Alain Lamassoure Renate Sommer Salvatore Domenico Pogliese Burkhard Balz Herbert Dorfmann Lorenzo Cesa Frank Engel Viviane Reding Report A8-0206/2018 Merja Kyllönen Enforcement requirements and specific rules for posting drivers in the road transport sector (COM(2017)0278 - C8-0170/2017 - 2017/0121(COD)) AM\P8_AMA(2018)0206(171-174)EN.docx PE621.702v01-00 EN United in diversity EN Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment Member States shall not apply points (b) Member States shall not apply Directive and (c) of the first subparagraph of Article 96/71/EC to drivers on transit journeys. 3 (1) of Directive 96/71/EC to drivers in Nor shall they apply points (b) and (c) of the road transport sector employed by the first subparagraph of Article 3 (1) of undertakings referred to in Article 1(3)(a) Directive 96/71/EC to drivers in the road of that Directive, when performing transport sector employed by undertakings international carriage operations as defined referred to in Article 1(3)(a) of that by Regulations 1072/2009 and 1073/2009 Directive, when performing international where the period of posting to their carriage operations as defined by territory to perform these operations is Regulations 1072/2009 and 1073/2009 shorter than or equal to 3 days during a where the period of posting to their period of one calendar month.
    [Show full text]
  • 12.5.2021 A9-0116/28 Amendment 28 Tiemo Wölken, Alex Agius Saliba
    12.5.2021 A9-0116/28 Amendment 28 Tiemo Wölken, Alex Agius Saliba, Rasmus Andresen, Eric Andrieu, Maria Arena, Katarina Barley, Gabriele Bischoff, Udo Bullmann, Delara Burkhardt, Anna Cavazzini, Anna Deparnay-Grunenberg, Pascal Durand, Bas Eickhout, Engin Eroglu, Ismail Ertug, Niels Fuglsang, Claudia Gamon, Evelyne Gebhardt, Giorgos Georgiou, Anja Hazekamp, Hannes Heide, Petra Kammerevert, Dietmar Köster, Constanze Krehl, Bernd Lange, Liudas Mažylis, Ulrike Müller, Maria Noichl, Jutta Paulus, Sándor Rónai, Christel Schaldemose, Andreas Schieder, Joachim Schuster, Günther Sidl, Birgit Sippel, Vera Tax, Kathleen Van Brempt, Marianne Vind, Angelika Winzig, Carlos Zorrinho Report A9-0116/2021 Jens Geier European Strategy for Hydrogen (2020/2242(INI)) Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 Motion for a resolution Amendment 4. Is convinced that hydrogen 4. Is convinced that hydrogen produced from renewable sources is key to produced from renewable sources is key to the EU’s energy transition, as only the EU’s energy transition, as only renewable hydrogen can sustainably renewable hydrogen can sustainably contribute to achieving climate neutrality contribute to achieving climate neutrality in the long term and avoid lock-in effects in the long term and avoid lock-in effects and stranded assets; notes with concern and stranded assets; notes with concern that renewable hydrogen is not yet that renewable hydrogen is not yet competitive; therefore urges the competitive; therefore urges the Commission and the Member States to Commission and the Member
    [Show full text]