Corona Triumphalis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Corona Triumphalis Corona Civica - the "Civic Crown" was awarded for the rescue of a Roman citizen from danger in the face of the enemy. This was the highest award available to the Legion and apparently was limited to the centuriate* and higher ranks. Though it could be worn on the recipient’s head, and might have been on initial a- warding, it was thereafter attached to the leather harness or worn clipped on to the armor breast plate. This award was later known as the Corona Civica Aurea.~* Corona Vallaris - this crown was awarded to the Unit Commander or entire units for capturing an enemy camp or fortification. This decoration was also known as the Corona Castrensis. Corona Myrtaea - this was originally a wreath of grass or flowers awarded to those who raised a siege of a Roman camp. Also known as the Corona Graminaea or the Corona Obsidionalis, this award later became an actual metal crown awarded to the Unit Commander and entire units for rescuing their fellow besieged soldiers. Pliny the Elder lists only eight individual recipients, including Caesar Augustus. The scarceness of this award is attributable to either the high status of this decoration or the fact that there were few Roman Army units that needed rescuing. Corona Triumphalis - the "Crown of Triumph." Also referred to as the Corona Aurea,e** or Golden Crown, it was awarded to Com- manders of Armies (muces) who were victors of great battles and campaigns. These crowns were first made of laurel leaves, but later fashioned of gold. The crown was worn during the Triumph Parade, then given to the Temple of Jove. Julius Caesar collected several thousand of these crowns during his victorious campaigns and later had them melted down to pay the army.7 Hasta Pura - this award was a short blunt javelin made of silver. Awarded only to members of the centuriate and higher ranks, it was the second highest decoration for bravery. Vexillum - this award was the highest decoration available in the Roman Army. No examples remain, but it is described as a small purple banner affixed to a short staff set in a silver orb. While it is hard to envision such a decoration, it is possible that it was carried by an aide or servant much like a personal standard. Apparently this decoration was available only to those of sena- torial rank, which would have limited it to Army Commanders, etc. *Centurigns were the commissioned officers of the Roman Army. They held their commissions from the Emperor and their records were kept in Rome. They were commissioned after Training School in Rome, directly from the ranks, and in some rare cases were elected by their soldiers. eeThere are various references to an award known as the Corona Aurea, a plain golden crown awarded for bravery. However, the Romans were fairly particular in using proper titles for decora- tions. Thus, I believe that references to a golden crown mean any decoration that was signified by such a crown, not a ~- lar decoration of that name. This area is certainly open both to speculation and to further research. ~**See my prior note relative to the possible existence of a de- coration known as the Corona Aurea. FIGURE 2 This is an artist’s conception of a Legion’s Eagle belong- ing to Legion II Augustus, stationed in upper Britain from circa 68 A. D. until 215 A.D. There is no des- cription of the various types of eoronae. However, it is to be assumed that each looked different so as to dis- tinguish the one from the other. For example, the Corona Civiea had oak leaves and acorns intermixed. The Eagle might have other additions; streamers, phaZerae, etc. It was carried by a hand-picked soldier known as an eagle-bearer ~Aquilifer), who was a senior non-com- missioned officer. Those decorations which were meant to be affixed to the wearer’s person (~ora~s and corinne) came with ribbons ~ ~nisei~ which were considered a part of the decoration itself. In the absence of oak leaf clusters or stars, repeat decorations were awarded and worn. Units, which were awarded various coronae had them attached to their eagle {see Figure 2). It is believed that members of the unit received and wore the coronae or pha!aerae awarded to the unit on their person - much the same procedure as exists today with the award of Unit Citations and the like. The eagle also bore the name of the Legion and any titles won in battle or a- warded by the Emperor8. For example, Legions If, Ill, and VIII had the title Augusta added to their names for loyalty to Octav- ian during the civil war. More often we see an honorific such as pia fideZis, "devoted and loyal," added to a Legion’s name. Thus, when the Emperor Domitian honored the Legio f Minervia in 83 A. D., it became Legio i Minervia pia fidelis Domitiana. After Domi- tian’s death, his na e was dropped and the Legion became Legio I Minervia pia fidelis . The name of the reigning sovereign was equivalent to the prefix "Royal" in the British Army. The eagle was the symbol of the Legion, guarded by picked troops, and rare- ly lost to the enemy. It is said that when Varus lost three Legions and their eagles to the Germans in 92 A. D. at the ambush of Saltus Teutoburgensis, Augustus brooded over the fate of the eagles and could not rest until punitive expeditions were sent to recover them.* He also refused to reconstitute the numbers of the Legions involved since he believed them disgraced forever for losing their eagles. There have been very few of these decorations preserved. A few phalerae were found; perhaps not over a dozen exist today. What we know of the awards and how they looked is from written reports at the time and sepulchral stele of marble and stone {see Figures 3, 4, and S). These reliefs show the stern visages of long-dead Roman soldiers wearing their ceremonial armor and their decora- tions. One of the most famous was L. Siecius Dentatus, who be- came Tribunus PZebei in 4S4 B. C. He was a veteran of 120 battles and had 45 scars on the front of his body (none on his back). He had been awarded 18 hastae purae, 25 ~hagerae, 83 torques, 160 armilZae, and 26 coronae, of which 14 were coronae civicae, three corona murales, and one corona graminaea. Of such men were the Legions made and by them were the frontiers of Rome secured. The Romans left us many reminders of their passing. Not only the crumbling ruins of their baths, arches, aqueducts, bridges, and roads, but also traditions of laws, language, and civilization. In the military sphere, the Romans left us the first system of military decorations, some of which still exist in altered forms today.** Lastly, the Roman Army left many great military tradi- tions, chief among which was centuries of world peace. *Only two of the three were recovered by Germanicus. **e.g., if you look at the former ~leritorious Unit Citation (the patch with golden crown), you will see the present day version of the co~onae awarded in the Armies of Rome. The crown and eagle still exSst as a basic part of many of our current awards and decorations. .
Recommended publications
  • INGO GILDENHARD Cicero, Philippic 2, 44–50, 78–92, 100–119 Latin Text, Study Aids with Vocabulary, and Commentary CICERO, PHILIPPIC 2, 44–50, 78–92, 100–119
    INGO GILDENHARD Cicero, Philippic 2, 44–50, 78–92, 100–119 Latin text, study aids with vocabulary, and commentary CICERO, PHILIPPIC 2, 44–50, 78–92, 100–119 Cicero, Philippic 2, 44–50, 78–92, 100–119 Latin text, study aids with vocabulary, and commentary Ingo Gildenhard https://www.openbookpublishers.com © 2018 Ingo Gildenhard The text of this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). This license allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the text; to adapt the text and to make commercial use of the text providing attribution is made to the author(s), but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work. Attribution should include the following information: Ingo Gildenhard, Cicero, Philippic 2, 44–50, 78–92, 100–119. Latin Text, Study Aids with Vocabulary, and Commentary. Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers, 2018. https://doi. org/10.11647/OBP.0156 Every effort has been made to identify and contact copyright holders and any omission or error will be corrected if notification is made to the publisher. In order to access detailed and updated information on the license, please visit https:// www.openbookpublishers.com/product/845#copyright Further details about CC BY licenses are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/4.0/ All external links were active at the time of publication unless otherwise stated and have been archived via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine at https://archive.org/web Digital material and resources associated with this volume are available at https://www.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Context the Real Julius Caesar
    Name _____________________________________ Period __________ Standards Focus: Historical Context The Real Julius Caesar Gaius Julius Caesar born July 12, 100BC, is one of the most well-known political leaders in history. Caesar was considered to be a military genius and brilliant politician, and his life and conquests continue to be widely revered and studied throughout the world. It was believed that Caesar was a direct descendant of the Trojan prince Aeneas, who was the son of the goddess Venus. His father, whom he was named after, was a war hero and respected politician. Although a member of the aristocracy, Caesar and his family lived in one of the lower-class neighborhoods in Rome. Little is known about Caesar’s early years, other than having two sisters, both of whom were apparently named Julia. Caesar’s father died in 84BC, and Caesar found himself the patriarch of the family at age sixteen. A year later, Caesar married Cornelia, daughter of the famous orator Cinna. As a young man, Caesar saw plenty of political and social unrest under the harsh dictatorship of Lucius Cornelius Sulla. Shortly after Caesar married Cornelia, Civil War erupted and Cinna was killed, leaving Caesar without an inheritance. In fear for his own life, he fled to Asia and joined the army, serving under Marcus Thermus. He received numerous honors, including the Civic Crown which was the second highest Roman military award at the time. In 78BC, Sulla died unexpectedly in his sleep, and Caesar returned to Rome. He began his political career, becoming a renowned orator and powerful politician.
    [Show full text]
  • 11 Leadership Lessons from Julius Caesar
    11 LEADERSHIP LESSONS FROM JULIUS CAESAR If there ever was a most characteristic military leader in history, that was Julius Caesar. Beyond his indisputable ability for strategy, the Roman General stood apart due to his prowess in leadership and his ability to transmit his wisdom and vision to the troops he was commanding who in turn gave Caesar their trust and loyalty. Caesar was born into a patrician family, the gens Julia, which claimed descent from Iulus, son of the legendary Trojan Prince Aeneas. Due to instability in Rome and because of Sullas proscriptions, Caesar the age of 19 Caesar joined the army and served with distinction at the Siege of Mytilene earning the Civic crown. After hearing of Sulla’s death, Caesar thought it safe to return to Rome although Pirates captured him and although eventually released he swore he would hunt them down and kill them, an act he successfully completed. Caesar climbed up the political ladder throughout his life eventually becoming Proconsul of Cisalpine Gaul and Illyricum. Caesar went on to become the greatest General and statesman of his era in which he attained ultimate power and received the title ‘Dictator for life’. However, the underlying political conflicts had not been resolved and on the Ides of March, 44 BC, Caesar was assassinated by a group of rebellious senators led by Gaius Cassius Longinus, Marcus Junius Brutus and Decimus Junius Brutus. Caesar thought differently than his contemporaries and to help us to understand why he stood out as arguably the Greatest Roman who ever lived. Here are some lessons that a bright dead personality could teach us were they alive today, Gaius Julius Caesar – a man so successful in his time that his last name became synonymous with “Emperor”.
    [Show full text]
  • Anglo-Saxon Constitutional History
    Outline 9/14/2020 ROMAN LAW PRINCIPATE CONSTITUTIONAL OUTLINE, PROCEDURE OUTLINE I. Chronology: Principate 27 BC – 284 AD; Dominate: 284–476 AD (in the West). There is some controversy as to where to place the beginning of the Dominate. 284 AD, the beginning of the reign of Diocletian, seems best. He seems to have been the first emperor to use the word dominus, from which we get ‘dominate’ as part of his official title. 1. 27 BC – 284 AD: Principate a. 27 BC – 69 AD: Julio-Claudian emperors. Augustus, Tiberius, Gaius (called Caligula), Claudius (made emperor by the praetorian guard), Nero (of burning of Rome fame) b. 68/69 AD, the year of the four emperors: Galba, Otho, Vitellus, Vespasian. The succession problem becomes public c. .69–96 AD: Flavian emperors (soldiers all): Vespasian, Titus (sacks Jerusalem), Domitian (Titus’ brother) d. 96–180 AD: “5 good emperors”: Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antoninus Pius, Marcus Aurelius. The first three were unrelated, the last two began a dynasty of Antonines. e. 180–235 AD: The Antonine dynasty merged into the Severan dynasty: Commodus (Marcus Aurelius’ son, a disaster as an emperor), Septimius Severus (a tough soldier and a good administrator), Caracalla (of baths and constitutio Antoniniana fame), Elagabalus (a sun-worshipper from the East), Severus Alexander (the last of the line). The last great classical jurist died shortly after the end of the Severan dynasty. The chronology continues; the following will be considered in class on 9/22/2020: f. 235–284 AD: “30 tyrants” 2. 284–565 AD: Dominate II. The Constitution of the Principate 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Gaius Julius Caesar Was a Roman Aristocrat, Politician and General Who Used His Military Success to Gain Politician Dominance
    Gaius Julius Caesar was a Roman aristocrat, politician and general who used his military success to gain political dominance during the closing years of the Roman Republic. His Gallic Wars represent one of the largest acquisitions of territory by a single Roman general and brought Caesar the wealth, prestige and veteran army that allowed him to establish himself through force as dictator in Rome. Far-reaching political and social reforms followed, until on the eve of leaving Rome for a campaign against the Parthians, Caesar was assassinated by a conspiracy of former enemies and allies. Caesar was born in 100 BCE to the aristocratic Julian family that claimed ancestry back to the Trojan hero Aeneas and the gods. The Julii were one of oldest families in Rome and this gave Caesar an advantage in the intensely competitive political world of the late Roman Republic, though its members had not been particularly successful politically for several generations. The family had received a welcome financial boost through the marriage of Caesar’s aunt to the political newcomer Marius, one of Rome’s leading generals of the late second century BCE, but this brought with it dangers. His relationship with Marius led to Caesar’s life being endangered during the political upheavals during Sulla’s dominance in the 80s BCE and he was lucky to escape unscathed. He sensibly withdrew from Italy and undertook military service in the eastern Mediterranean, first on the staff of Minucius Thermus, the governor of Asia, and subsequently with Servilius Isauricus in a campaign against pirates. Whilst on Thermus’ staff, Caesar gained renown for two actions: his relationship with the king of Bithynia, Nicomedes, to whose court Caesar had been sent to acquire ships for Thermus’ campaign; and for his courage in battle.
    [Show full text]
  • A COMPANION to the ROMAN ARMY Edited By
    ACTA01 8/12/06 11:10 AM Page iii A COMPANION TO THE ROMAN ARMY Edited by Paul Erdkamp ACTA01 8/12/06 11:10 AM Page i A COMPANION TO THE ROMAN ARMY ACTA01 8/12/06 11:10 AM Page ii BLACKWELL COMPANIONS TO THE ANCIENT WORLD This series provides sophisticated and authoritative overviews of periods of ancient history, genres of classical lit- erature, and the most important themes in ancient culture. Each volume comprises between twenty-five and forty concise essays written by individual scholars within their area of specialization. The essays are written in a clear, provocative, and lively manner, designed for an international audience of scholars, students, and general readers. Ancient History Published A Companion to the Roman Army A Companion to the Classical Greek World Edited by Paul Erdkamp Edited by Konrad H. Kinzl A Companion to the Roman Republic A Companion to the Ancient Near East Edited by Nathan Rosenstein and Edited by Daniel C. Snell Robert Morstein-Marx A Companion to the Hellenistic World A Companion to the Roman Empire Edited by Andrew Erskine Edited by David S. Potter In preparation A Companion to Ancient History A Companion to Late Antiquity Edited by Andrew Erskine Edited by Philip Rousseau A Companion to Archaic Greece A Companion to Byzantium Edited by Kurt A. Raaflaub and Hans van Wees Edited by Elizabeth James A Companion to Julius Caesar Edited by Miriam Griffin Literature and Culture Published A Companion to Catullus A Companion to Greek Rhetoric Edited by Marilyn B. Skinner Edited by Ian Worthington A Companion to Greek Religion A Companion to Ancient Epic Edited by Daniel Ogden Edited by John Miles Foley A Companion to Classical Tradition A Companion to Greek Tragedy Edited by Craig W.
    [Show full text]
  • Julius Caesar
    Working Paper CEsA CSG 168/2018 ANCIENT ROMAN POLITICS – JULIUS CAESAR Maria SOUSA GALITO Abstract Julius Caesar (JC) survived two civil wars: first, leaded by Cornelius Sulla and Gaius Marius; and second by himself and Pompeius Magnus. Until he was stabbed to death, at a senate session, in the Ides of March of 44 BC. JC has always been loved or hated, since he was alive and throughout History. He was a war hero, as many others. He was a patrician, among many. He was a roman Dictator, but not the only one. So what did he do exactly to get all this attention? Why did he stand out so much from the crowd? What did he represent? JC was a front-runner of his time, not a modern leader of the XXI century; and there are things not accepted today that were considered courageous or even extraordinary achievements back then. This text tries to explain why it’s important to focus on the man; on his life achievements before becoming the most powerful man in Rome; and why he stood out from every other man. Keywords Caesar, Politics, Military, Religion, Assassination. Sumário Júlio César (JC) sobreviveu a duas guerras civis: primeiro, lideradas por Cornélio Sula e Caio Mário; e depois por ele e Pompeius Magnus. Até ser esfaqueado numa sessão do senado nos Idos de Março de 44 AC. JC foi sempre amado ou odiado, quando ainda era vivo e ao longo da História. Ele foi um herói de guerra, como outros. Ele era um patrício, entre muitos. Ele foi um ditador romano, mas não o único.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ancient Roman Civilization
    Grade 3 Core Knowledge Language Arts® • Listening & Learning™ Strand The Ancient Roman Civilization Roman Ancient The Tell It Again!™ Read-Aloud Anthology Read-Aloud Again!™ It Tell The Ancient Roman Civilization Tell It Again!™ Read-Aloud Anthology Listening & Learning™ Strand GRAde 3 Core Knowledge Language Arts® Creative Commons Licensing This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. You are free: to Share — to copy, distribute and transmit the work to Remix — to adapt the work Under the following conditions: Attribution — You must attribute the work in the following manner: This work is based on an original work of the Core Knowledge® Foundation made available through licensing under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. This does not in any way imply that the Core Knowledge Foundation endorses this work. Noncommercial — You may not use this work for commercial purposes. Share Alike — If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license to this one. With the understanding that: For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. The best way to do this is with a link to this web page: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ Copyright © 2013 Core Knowledge Foundation www.coreknowledge.org All Rights Reserved. Core Knowledge Language Arts, Listening & Learning, and Tell It Again! are trademarks of the Core Knowledge Foundation. Trademarks and trade names are shown in this book strictly for illustrative and educational purposes and are the property of their respective owners.
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis arxi dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality Illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did rx)t send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to t>e removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9” black arxJ white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. Bell & Howell Information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 UMI’ THE ROMAN CAVALRY CAVALRY COMBAT AND ELITE REPUTATION IN THE MIDDLE AND LATE REPUBLIC DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Jeremiah B McCall, M A ***** The Ohio State University 2000 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Seven Deeds of Honour and Their Crowns: Lydgate and a Late Fifteenth-Century Scots Chivalric Treatise
    Studies in Scottish Literature Volume 28 | Issue 1 Article 13 1993 The eveS n Deeds of Honour and Their rC owns: Lydgate and a Late Fifteenth-Century Scots Chivalric Treatise L. A. J. R. Houwen Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/ssl Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Houwen, L. A. J. R. (1993) "The eS ven Deeds of Honour and Their rC owns: Lydgate and a Late Fifteenth-Century Scots Chivalric Treatise," Studies in Scottish Literature: Vol. 28: Iss. 1. Available at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/ssl/vol28/iss1/13 This Article is brought to you by the Scottish Literature Collections at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Studies in Scottish Literature by an authorized editor of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. L. A. J. R. Houwen The Seven Deeds of Honour and Their Crowns: Lydgate and a Late Fifteenth-Century Scots Chivalric Treatise Almost two decades have passed since something from British Library, Harley MS 6149 was last published. This was Diane Bomstein's edition of the Scots prose Vegetius which was published in this same journa1. l Until I started work on this manuscript a few years ago it had been virtually ig­ nored. 2 The text presented here has never been edited before. It is a curious lit­ tle piece that deals with (Roman) wreaths of honor. It was probably written around 1494 by the Scottish scribe and Kintyre Pursuivant, Adam Loutfut. There is little or no evidence that points in the direction of it being a trans­ lation, although it is difficult to base any finn conclusions on such a short text.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Rome Study Guide
    Ancient Rome Study Guide Directions: Study the below information and concepts in order to be prepared for class and assessments. Map: be able to label Europe, Africa, Egypt, Rome, Greece, Tiber River, Turkey, Carthage, Gaul, Constantinople Vocabulary Civilization: group of people living together in a well-organized way (have language, leaders, laws, religion, jobs, writing systems, education etc.) AD: Anno Domini which on the bases of religions mean in the year of the Lord and describes timer after Jesus was born BC/BCE: Before Christ was born or Before Common Era Artifacts: man-made objects, such as tools or ornamental decorations that show how a group of people lived and developed their way of life (an archeologist is a person who finds and studies these artifacts) Ruins: remains of a structure or an old civilization; a destroyed town or city Culture: characteristics that make up a group of people; a way of life Roman Republic: form of government where citizens of Rome could vote; came after the overthrow of the Etruscan kings Consuls: two Roman government officials that were elected every year by the Senate to act as leaders of the government, with authority to choose whether new laws should pass, whether Rome should go to war Patricians: Rome’s elite, a small group of wealthy, powerful people who owned large homes and had the right to vote and had special protections and privileges under the law. Plebeians: second-class citizens who did not have all the rights and privileges as patricians but who made up the largest number of Roman citizens.
    [Show full text]
  • Augustus Caesar
    LANCASTER PAMPHLETS Augustus Caesar David Shotter London and New York IN THE SAME SERIES General Editors: Eric J.Evans and P.D.King Lynn Abrams Bismarck and the German Empire 1871–1918 David Arnold The Age of Discovery 1400–1600 A.L.Beier The Problem of the Poor in Tudor and Early Stuart England Martin Blinkhorn Democracy and Civil War in Spain 1931–1939 Martin Blinkhorn Mussolini and Fascist Italy Robert M.Bliss Restoration England 1660–1688 Stephen Constantine Lloyd George Stephen Constantine Social Conditions in Britain 1918– 1939 Susan Doran Elizabeth I and Religion 1558–1603 Christopher Durston James I Eric J.Evans The Great Reform Act of 1832 Eric J.Evans Political Parties in Britain 1783–1867 Eric J.Evans Sir Robert Peel Dick Geary Hitler and Nazism John Gooch The Unification of Italy Alexander Grant Henry VII M.J.Heale The American Revolution Ruth Henig The Origins of the First World War Ruth Henig The Origins of the Second World War 1933–1939 Ruth Henig Versailles and After 1919–1933 P.D.King Charlemagne Stephen J.Lee Peter the Great Stephen J.Lee The Thirty Years War J.M.Mackenzie The Partition of Africa 1880–1900 Michael Mullett Calvin Michael Mullett The Counter-Reformation Michael Mullett James II and English Politics 1678– 1688 iii Michael Mullett Luther D.G.Newcombe Henry VIII and the English Reformation Robert Pearce Attlee’s Labour Governments 1945– 51 Gordon Phillips The Rise of the Labour Party 1893– 1931 John Plowright Regency England J.H.Shennan France Before the Revolution J.H.Shennan International Relations in Europe
    [Show full text]