Saving Eden: the Next Three Years 1 2

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Saving Eden: the Next Three Years 1 2 SAVING EDEN: THE NEXT THREE YEARS 1 2 The first thing to acknowledge is that we We expect these outcomes to become the don’t have all the answers yet. Key to basis for specialist working groups, with progressing this plan is the establishment each having a detailed strategy and action of a catchment coalition to agree a series of plan. We foresee that different organisations actions and responsibilities. We foresee that will bring different kinds of knowledge, this group of people and organisations will experience and skills to this process. These sit down around a table and agree a series specialist working groups would need to of very specific actions for making this move identify where they can add value through from a manifesto and series of aspirations collaboration, this should not be about to a technical plan over the next three years. doing by partnership for partnership’s sake… it’s all about adding value and making This document has two sections, the first THE HARD WORK STARTS HERE. bigger changes. sets out what the key outcomes are that we We have to find a way to change things in are aiming at achieving, these are followed the catchment. We have to find people and by some clear targets. The second sets out organisations that can make these changes the structural changes we think we need to real. And we have to do all of this in a achieve if we have any chance of delivering difficult economic climate in which time anything above and beyond what would and money are in short supply… So how have happened anyway. are we going to change anything? SECTION 1: SECTION 2: THE BIG OUTCOMES A ROBUST STRUCTURE FOR CHANGE A WATER-FRIENDLY PLANNING SYSTEM D1 ESK-BASED STUDIES CAPTURE EXISTING KNOWLEDGE (2012) A RESILIENT NETWORK OF HABITATS E2 STABLISH STRATEGIC WFD CATCHMENT COALITION (2013) A DYNAMIC AND MORE NATURAL RIVER SYSTEM W3 ALKOVERS TO GROUND-TRUTH DESK-BASED STUDIES (2013) A RIVER FOR PEOPLE: ACCESSIBLE, FUN AND CULTURALLY VIBRANT O4 RGANISATIONAL PEER REVIEW (2013-14) A WATER-FRIENDLY FARMING CATCHMENT C5 ONSULT WITH 20/30 COMMUNITIES (2013-14) A KNOWLEDGEABLE AND WATER-FRIENDLY END-USER COMMUNITY F6 URTHER DEVELOP EVIDENCE (2013-14) JOINED-UP THINKING AND INVESTMENT AT A CATCHMENT SCALE F7 ULLY COSTED, TARGETED AND DELIVERABLE PLAN (2015) L8 AST RESORT REGULATION 3 4 It is envisaged that there will be an additional 20,000 people living in the TARGETS ENSURE THat THE LOCAL catchment in the future so a key action DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK FOR is to shape the Local Development CARLISLE AND EDEN IS FOR Water- Framework and planning system for the FRIENDLY COMMUNITIES E.G. CARLISLE growth of Carlisle and Eden District. Key issues are about the capacity of existing GREEN CITY, PENRITH GREEN TOWN. water infrastructure, how surface water is PROMOTE AWARENESS, SHOWCASE dealt with in a way that does not lead to unnecessary flooding, harmful effects on AND EVIDENCE THE MUltIPLE BENEFITS the river environment and capacity problems Water-FRIENDLY DEVELOPMENT CAN with wastewater and drinking water supply. BRING TO ADD CREDIBILITY TO THIS. 2013 and 2014 will see the Local Plan PROVIDE GUIDANCE AND TRAINING for Carlisle developed and completed TO LOCAL AUTHORITIES IN Water- – effectively setting the ground rules and aspirations for city growth. Carlisle FRIENDLY DEVELOPMENT CONTROL. City Council has developed a ‘Green ENSURE FUTURE HYDROPOWER AND Infrastructure Strategy’ to address these issues, but we wish to encourage them INDUSTRIAL SCHEMES DO NOT HAVE ONE OF THE BEST WAYS TO MAKE SURE and other stakeholders to make the growth A NegatIVE IMPACT ON THE ECOLOGY THAT THINGS Don’t get worse is to of Carlisle an example of best practice in OR MORPHOLOGY OF OUR RIVERS. MAKE SURE THAT AS NEW COMMUNITIES, sustainable development. Local authorities NEW BUSINESSES, NEW FARMS, OR already have responsibilities for flood risk IMPROVE ENGAGEMENT WITH THE NEW HOUSES ARE BUILT THEY ARE assessments, consenting in-river works and TOURISM SECTOR, PARTICULARLY IN THE ENCOURAGED TO BE WATER-FRIENDLY works affecting watercourses on smaller ULLSWater AREA, ABOUT SUstaINABLE water bodies – responsibilities that are not Water-FRIENDLY GROWTH. THROUGH THE PLANNING (DEVELOPMENT easy for local authorities. We think the next CONTROL) SYSTEM. step is to support local authorities to make WHY SHOULD I CARE? IF DEVELOPMENT good decisions through guidance, training IS ILL-JUDGED YOU AND YOUR and specialist support. faMILY MAY HAVE TO LIVE WITH THE The bottom line is that growth and CONSEQUENCES, EITHER DIRECTLY redevelopment will happen everywhere in (BECAUSE YOU MAY LIVE IN A HOUSE the catchment but there is work to be done to influence development and work with THat FLOODS ETC.) OR INDIRECTLY planners to shape the rules, but perhaps (AS YOU MAY BE ASKED AS A LOCAL more importantly to empower them to make taXPAYER TO PAY FOR THESE ISSUES good decisions. There is a need to river-proof TO BE SORTED OUT IN THE FUTURE). development – not least for the tourism sector – and to respond appropriately to the emergence of hydropower schemes to prevent damage to the ecology and morphology of rivers. There is also work to be done on developing models for paying for the sustainable development of the wider urban and semi-urban areas through a range of mechanisms including developer contributions. WHICH AUDIENCES? INVESTORS, PLANNERS AND POLITICIANS, COMMUNITIES 5 6 The rivers, streams, ditches, ponds, lakes, bogs, mires and wetland network TARGETS DELIVER OPPORTUNITY of the catchment are critical for a range MAPPING TO BRING TOGETHER of important species, including white- KNOWLEDGE ABOUT THE DISTRIBUTION clawed crayfish, salmon, eels, otters, and AND QUALITY OF OUR HABItat lampreys. But other ‘non-wet’ habitats such as woodlands and hedgerows are also NETWORKS AND THE OPPORTUNITIES crucial to the working of the ecosystem. The FOR IMPROVED RESILIENCE. THE PILOT Government’s Natural Environment White YEAR HAS HIGHLIGHTED THE VItal Paper championed ecological networks that CONTRIBUTION THat WOODLAND CAN are better connected – this is critical to their MAKE HERE. resilience to pressures like climate change, recovering from pollution, withstanding PRODUCE A targeted AND COSTED floods and droughts, and recovery from PLAN FOR IMPROVING, CreatING AND disease. The diversity of habitats is also RIVER AND WETLAND HABITATS NEED TO important as many species need a range of RECONNECTING FRESHWater-related BE BETTER CONNECTED. THIS IS CRITICAL habitats throughout their lifecycle. However, HABItats AND BUILDING RESILIENCE TO THEIR RESILIENCE TO PRESSURES many habitat networks in Eden are not in THROUGHOUT THE LANDSCAPE. SUCH AS CLIMATE CHANGE. optimal condition and affected by pressures such as overgrazing, invasive species and ENSURE THat FUTURE BIODIVERSITY unsympathetic maintenance. POLICIES AND AGRI-ENVIRONMENT We believe there is a pressing need to look SCHEMES INCLUDE A STRONGER at the network of habitats in the catchment FOCUS ON FRESHWater HABItats. to identify interventions that can strengthen it. The research and analysis should map the BETTER CO-ORDINatION OF EXISTING current habitat network, its scale, diversity AND FUTURE INVESTMENT THROUGH and quality, the gaps or weaknesses in PARTNERSHIP WORKING. connectivity, and the areas where additional habitats can be created. It may be that DELIVER THE EXISTING PROGRAMME specific habitat assessments are required OF HABItat IMPROVEMENT IN EDEN. for areas with specific issues. A massive amount of work is already undertaken by DEVELOP PROJECTS AND SECURE key partners such as Natural England and FUNDING TO DELIVER THE LONG-TERM Forestry Commission – the key for this plan HABItat MASTERPLAN FOR A NETWORK is how we can co-ordinate the collective OF RESILIENT HABItats IN EDEN. investment and effort to add value. The people of the catchment told us that IMPROVED RESILIENCE AND rivers allow them to see wildlife, and many CONNECTIVITY OF FISH HABItats wanted this to be protected and improved THROUGHOUT THE CatCHMENT. where possible. The strategy should shape the investment of all the key partner IMPROVED RESILIENCE OF STILLWater organisations so that there is a joining-up HABItats, WITH ULLSWater AS THE of effort and focus. Given that many tens PRIORITY WaterBODY. of millions of pounds are invested in the catchment each year, we think that such WHY SHOULD I CARE? YOU TOLD a strategy can add real value and make US YOU LOVE WILDLIFE BY RIVERS, the catchment more robust and resilient AND WE WANT TO ENSURE THat IT IS to climate change and other challenges, as well as having a beneficial effect on the THERE IN THE FUTURE, AND THat IT ecological status of the rivers. HAS THE RIGHT HABItats TO COPE WITH CLIMate CHANGE AND OTHER RISKS. WHICH AUDIENCES? INVESTORS, farMERS AND LAND MANAGERS 7 8 This is more about the nature of the river and wetland environments of the catchment TARGETS INCREASE EDUCatION AND and how they work. One of the biggest and AWARENESS ABOUT THE IMPOrtaNCE ambitious challenges to securing good OF DYNAMIC NatURAL RIVER SYSTEMS, ecological status is the historic modification IN PARTICULAR ADDRESSING THE ISSUE of waterways and rivers. These modifications have included straightening and dredging OF MAINTENANCE AND DREDGING. for land drainage or flood protection, weirs DEVELOP A SERIES OF for mills and dams for water abstraction. The net effect of these changes can be RE-NatURALIsatION DEMONstratION significant for wildlife, habitat and on the SITES TO EVALUate AND SHOWCASE speed at which floods reach population WHat IS POSSIBLE, COST EFFECTIVE, centres. There are some historic features ACCEPtaBLE TO LANDOWNERS, AND THE that no-one would seek to remove or reverse INVESTMENT THat MAY BE AVAILABLE (e.g. Haweswater reservoir), but there are IF THE EDEN AND ITS TRIBUTARIES ARE others that can be addressed to improve FOR LEVERAGING THESE CHANGES. TO REAch ‘gooD’ ecologicAL STATUS BY the ecological status of our water bodies.
Recommended publications
  • New Additions to CASCAT from Carlisle Archives
    Cumbria Archive Service CATALOGUE: new additions August 2021 Carlisle Archive Centre The list below comprises additions to CASCAT from Carlisle Archives from 1 January - 31 July 2021. Ref_No Title Description Date BRA British Records Association Nicholas Whitfield of Alston Moor, yeoman to Ranald Whitfield the son and heir of John Conveyance of messuage and Whitfield of Standerholm, Alston BRA/1/2/1 tenement at Clargill, Alston 7 Feb 1579 Moor, gent. Consideration £21 for Moor a messuage and tenement at Clargill currently in the holding of Thomas Archer Thomas Archer of Alston Moor, yeoman to Nicholas Whitfield of Clargill, Alston Moor, consideration £36 13s 4d for a 20 June BRA/1/2/2 Conveyance of a lease messuage and tenement at 1580 Clargill, rent 10s, which Thomas Archer lately had of the grant of Cuthbert Baynbrigg by a deed dated 22 May 1556 Ranold Whitfield son and heir of John Whitfield of Ranaldholme, Cumberland to William Moore of Heshewell, Northumberland, yeoman. Recites obligation Conveyance of messuage and between John Whitfield and one 16 June BRA/1/2/3 tenement at Clargill, customary William Whitfield of the City of 1587 rent 10s Durham, draper unto the said William Moore dated 13 Feb 1579 for his messuage and tenement, yearly rent 10s at Clargill late in the occupation of Nicholas Whitfield Thomas Moore of Clargill, Alston Moor, yeoman to Thomas Stevenson and John Stevenson of Corby Gates, yeoman. Recites Feb 1578 Nicholas Whitfield of Alston Conveyance of messuage and BRA/1/2/4 Moor, yeoman bargained and sold 1 Jun 1616 tenement at Clargill to Raynold Whitfield son of John Whitfield of Randelholme, gent.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report for the Year Ended the 31St March, 1963
    Twelfth Annual Report for the year ended the 31st March, 1963 Item Type monograph Publisher Cumberland River Board Download date 01/10/2021 01:06:39 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/26916 CUMBERLAND RIVER BOARD Twelfth Annual Report for the Year ended the 31st March, 1963 CUMBERLAND RIVER BOARD Twelfth Annual Report for the Year ended the 31st March, 1963 Chairman of the Board: Major EDWIN THOMPSON, O.B.E., F.L.A.S. Vice-Chairman: Major CHARLES SPENCER RICHARD GRAHAM RIVER BOARD HOUSE, LONDON ROAD, CARLISLE, CUMBERLAND. TELEPHONE CARLISLE 25151/2 NOTE The Cumberland River Board Area was defined by the Cumberland River Board Area Order, 1950, (S.I. 1950, No. 1881) made on 26th October, 1950. The Cumberland River Board was constituted by the Cumberland River Board Constitution Order, 1951, (S.I. 1951, No. 30). The appointed day on which the Board became responsible for the exercise of the functions under the River Boards Act, 1948, was 1st April, 1951. CONTENTS Page General — Membership Statutory and Standing Committees 4 Particulars of Staff 9 Information as to Water Resources 11 Land Drainage ... 13 Fisheries ... ... ... ........................................................ 21 Prevention of River Pollution 37 General Information 40 Information about Expenditure and Income ... 43 PART I GENERAL Chairman of the Board : Major EDWIN THOMPSON, O.B.E., F.L.A.S. Vice-Chairman : Major CHARLES SPENCER RICHARD GRAHAM. Members of the Board : (a) Appointed by the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food and by the Minister of Housing and Local Government. Wilfrid Hubert Wace Roberts, Esq., J.P. Desoglin, West Hall, Brampton, Cumb.
    [Show full text]
  • Königreichs Zur Abgrenzung Der Der Kommission in Übereinstimmung
    19 . 5 . 75 Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr . L 128/23 1 RICHTLINIE DES RATES vom 28 . April 1975 betreffend das Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten landwirtschaftlichen Gebiete im Sinne der Richtlinie 75/268/EWG (Vereinigtes Königreich ) (75/276/EWG ) DER RAT DER EUROPAISCHEN 1973 nach Abzug der direkten Beihilfen, der hill GEMEINSCHAFTEN — production grants). gestützt auf den Vertrag zur Gründung der Euro­ Als Merkmal für die in Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buch­ päischen Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft, stabe c ) der Richtlinie 75/268/EWG genannte ge­ ringe Bevölkerungsdichte wird eine Bevölkerungs­ gestützt auf die Richtlinie 75/268/EWG des Rates ziffer von höchstens 36 Einwohnern je km2 zugrunde vom 28 . April 1975 über die Landwirtschaft in Berg­ gelegt ( nationaler Mittelwert 228 , Mittelwert in der gebieten und in bestimmten benachteiligten Gebie­ Gemeinschaft 168 Einwohner je km2 ). Der Mindest­ ten (*), insbesondere auf Artikel 2 Absatz 2, anteil der landwirtschaftlichen Erwerbspersonen an der gesamten Erwerbsbevölkerung beträgt 19 % auf Vorschlag der Kommission, ( nationaler Mittelwert 3,08 % , Mittelwert in der Gemeinschaft 9,58 % ). nach Stellungnahme des Europäischen Parlaments , Eigenart und Niveau der vorstehend genannten nach Stellungnahme des Wirtschafts- und Sozialaus­ Merkmale, die von der Regierung des Vereinigten schusses (2 ), Königreichs zur Abgrenzung der der Kommission mitgeteilten Gebiete herangezogen wurden, ent­ sprechen den Merkmalen der in Artikel 3 Absatz 4 in Erwägung nachstehender Gründe : der Richtlinie
    [Show full text]
  • Der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr
    26 . 3 . 84 Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr . L 82 / 67 RICHTLINIE DES RATES vom 28 . Februar 1984 betreffend das Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten landwirtschaftlichen Gebiete im Sinne der Richtlinie 75 /268 / EWG ( Vereinigtes Königreich ) ( 84 / 169 / EWG ) DER RAT DER EUROPAISCHEN GEMEINSCHAFTEN — Folgende Indexzahlen über schwach ertragsfähige Böden gemäß Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe a ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG wurden bei der Bestimmung gestützt auf den Vertrag zur Gründung der Euro­ jeder der betreffenden Zonen zugrunde gelegt : über päischen Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft , 70 % liegender Anteil des Grünlandes an der landwirt­ schaftlichen Nutzfläche , Besatzdichte unter 1 Groß­ vieheinheit ( GVE ) je Hektar Futterfläche und nicht über gestützt auf die Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG des Rates vom 65 % des nationalen Durchschnitts liegende Pachten . 28 . April 1975 über die Landwirtschaft in Berggebieten und in bestimmten benachteiligten Gebieten ( J ), zuletzt geändert durch die Richtlinie 82 / 786 / EWG ( 2 ), insbe­ Die deutlich hinter dem Durchschnitt zurückbleibenden sondere auf Artikel 2 Absatz 2 , Wirtschaftsergebnisse der Betriebe im Sinne von Arti­ kel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe b ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG wurden durch die Tatsache belegt , daß das auf Vorschlag der Kommission , Arbeitseinkommen 80 % des nationalen Durchschnitts nicht übersteigt . nach Stellungnahme des Europäischen Parlaments ( 3 ), Zur Feststellung der in Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe c ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG genannten geringen Bevöl­ in Erwägung nachstehender Gründe : kerungsdichte wurde die Tatsache zugrunde gelegt, daß die Bevölkerungsdichte unter Ausschluß der Bevölke­ In der Richtlinie 75 / 276 / EWG ( 4 ) werden die Gebiete rung von Städten und Industriegebieten nicht über 55 Einwohner je qkm liegt ; die entsprechenden Durch­ des Vereinigten Königreichs bezeichnet , die in dem schnittszahlen für das Vereinigte Königreich und die Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten Gebiete Gemeinschaft liegen bei 229 beziehungsweise 163 .
    [Show full text]
  • Index to Gallery Geograph
    INDEX TO GALLERY GEOGRAPH IMAGES These images are taken from the Geograph website under the Creative Commons Licence. They have all been incorporated into the appropriate township entry in the Images of (this township) entry on the Right-hand side. [1343 images as at 1st March 2019] IMAGES FROM HISTORIC PUBLICATIONS From W G Collingwood, The Lake Counties 1932; paintings by A Reginald Smith, Titles 01 Windermere above Skelwith 03 The Langdales from Loughrigg 02 Grasmere Church Bridge Tarn 04 Snow-capped Wetherlam 05 Winter, near Skelwith Bridge 06 Showery Weather, Coniston 07 In the Duddon Valley 08 The Honister Pass 09 Buttermere 10 Crummock-water 11 Derwentwater 12 Borrowdale 13 Old Cottage, Stonethwaite 14 Thirlmere, 15 Ullswater, 16 Mardale (Evening), Engravings Thomas Pennant Alston Moor 1801 Appleby Castle Naworth castle Pendragon castle Margaret Countess of Kirkby Lonsdale bridge Lanercost Priory Cumberland Anne Clifford's Column Images from Hutchinson's History of Cumberland 1794 Vol 1 Title page Lanercost Priory Lanercost Priory Bewcastle Cross Walton House, Walton Naworth Castle Warwick Hall Wetheral Cells Wetheral Priory Wetheral Church Giant's Cave Brougham Giant's Cave Interior Brougham Hall Penrith Castle Blencow Hall, Greystoke Dacre Castle Millom Castle Vol 2 Carlisle Castle Whitehaven Whitehaven St Nicholas Whitehaven St James Whitehaven Castle Cockermouth Bridge Keswick Pocklington's Island Castlerigg Stone Circle Grange in Borrowdale Bowder Stone Bassenthwaite lake Roman Altars, Maryport Aqua-tints and engravings from
    [Show full text]
  • Westl\10HLAND
    162 FAR .WESTl\10HLAND. [KELLY~ }l'A~MR'RS continuetL 13a.inbridg-B Jonn, Xnt:Jck, Rnvenstone- Beck Richal'd, Sandwath, -Ravenllklne- .!.tkinson Jobn, Ryclal, Ambleside dale, KiI'kby St~phen I dale, Kirkby Btephen ' i AtkinsOIl John, Sandpot. Mallerstan/;. Bainbridg'e Richard, Holme, Carnfotth Beck Thomas, Low Fairbanlr, NMMr Kirkby Stephen Bainbridge Thomas, Church Brougb, Staveley, Kendal Atki.nson J. Town head, Cliburn,Penrth Kirkby Stephen 'Becks John, Langdale, Tebay RB.~ Atkirtson John, Witherslack, Grange- Bainbridge Thomas, 0rc-sby Garrett, Bec;mith John, High Ewbanll', Stain- over-Sands R. S.O Kirkby Stephen ' more South, Kirkby Stepbell AJldnson John Thomas, Town head, Bainbridge William, ArcheI"' hill, Bell A. &, Wm. Reagin,SOOp H:S.D Milburn, Newbiggin R. S. 0 Langdale, Tebay R S. 0 Bell George, Dirk 'rigg, Mallent:mg, Atkinson Joseph, Barnskew, Reagill, Bainbridge William, Croft end~ ,Bramp- Kirkby 8tephen Shap RS.O ton, Appleby Bell Henry, Dummah hill, Stainmore Atk~nson J.Ghyll hd. Crosthwaite,Kndl Bainbridge Wm. 1 Garthshill, Raven- South, Kirkby Stephen- Atkimon.T. Waitby, Kirkby StephAn stonedale, Kirkby Stephen Bell Tsaac, Kirkby Thore, Poorith Atkinson Mrs: Margaret, Brunthwaite, Bainbridge William, Keisley, .Appleby Bell .lames, Drybeck, Appleby Old Hutton, Kendal Bainhridge Wm. Kelleth, Tebay RS.O Bell .lames, Outhgill, Kirk'bj Stepmn Atkinson Mark, Greyber. Maulds Me8- Bainbridge W. Waitby, Kirkby Stephn Bell .Tames, Reagill, Shap R.S.O b. burn, Shap R.S.O Ba.ines Mrs. Agnes & Son, Whasset, Bell John, G'rackent.horpe, Appleb:f ..Atkinson Mark, Murton, Appleby Beetham, Milnthorpe R.S.O Bell .In. Guest ford, Whinfell, K~dal . Atkinson M.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Committee Applications Determined
    PLANNING COMMITTEE Agenda Item No. APPLICATIONS DETERMINED UNDER OFFICER DELEGATED POWERS FOR THE MONTH OF SEPTEMBER 2020 App No App Type Parish Description Location Applicant Decision 18/0852 Full Application Penrith Development of a Class 2 Industrial Building. Tipping OMEGA PROTEINS, GREYSTOKE Omega Proteins Limited APPROVED Shed. ROAD, PENRITH, CA11 0BX 19/0182 Reserved by Winton Discharge of conditions 3 (sample materials) and 4 LAND BETWEEN HILL TOP AND Mr & Mrs Longdon APPROVED Cond (surface water drainage) attached to approval MYRTLE COTTAGE, WINTON, 18/0482. KIRKBY STEPHEN, CA17 4HS 20/0043 Full Application Dufton Variation of condition 2 (plans compliance) attached FOUNTAIN VIEW, DUFTON, Mr & Mrs Lepri Simpson APPROVED to approval 19/0111. APPLEBY-IN-WESTMORLAND, CA16 6DB 20/0178 Full Application Brough Sowerby Erection of detached dwelling. LAND ADJACENT TO SOWERBY Mr & Mrs Alderson APPROVED LODGE, BROUGH SOWERBY, KIRKBY STEPHEN, CA17 4EG 20/0206 Full Application Greystoke Change of use of land to form a garden and HILL COTTAGE, JOHNBY, PENRITH, Mr & Mrs Townsend APPROVED proposed erection of extension. CA11 0UU 20/0218 Listed Building Appleby Listed Building Consent for proposed restoration of THE STABLES COURTYARD, Appleby Castle APPROVED decayed external and internal fabric, finishes and APPLEBY CASTLE, (Outbuildings) Ltd services installations, renovation of four existing BOROUGHGATE, APPLEBY, CA16 vacant dwellings and conversion of existing vacant 6XH single storey former stables buildings to form three new dwellings. 20/0219 Full Application Appleby Proposed restoration of decayed external and THE STABLES COURTYARD, Appleby Castle APPROVED internal fabric, finishes and services installations, APPLEBY CASTLE, (Outbuildings) Ltd renovation of four existing vacant dwellings and BOROUGHGATE, APPLEBY, CA16 conversion of existing vacant single storey former 6XH stables buildings to form three new dwellings.
    [Show full text]
  • Documents from The
    Documents from the Edenhall Estate, Cumbria Transcribed from the seller’s photos on eBay by Petra E. Mitchinson 2009 Contents Page Introduction ................................................................................................................ 6 The MUSGRAVE Family, Baronets of Edenhall ...................................................... 7 Transcriptions ............................................................................................................. 9 22 Apr 1671. Account for masons’ repairs at Hartley Castle .......................................... 9 25 Dec 1674. HM Customs House account, Carlisle port ............................................... 9 18 May 1681. Marriage agreement Mary MUSGRAVE & John DAVISON ................ 10 09 Sep 1686. Soulby Court Baron rents & fines list ..................................................... 12 1690s. Tenants’/voters’ list, Middle & West Ward, Westmorland ................................ 13 16 Sep 1708. Receipt for grass and cattle sold ............................................................. 15 20 Sep 1708. Receipt for 4 oxen and cattle .................................................................. 16 26 Jul 1710. List of live and dead goods at Edenhall & Hartley ................................... 16 14 May 1712. Receipt for various taxes ....................................................................... 17 08 Jul 1712. Receipt by the Rector of Crosby Garrett .................................................. 18 28 Jul 1712. Receipt for 6 rakes
    [Show full text]
  • Applications Received by Copeland Borough Council for Period
    Applications Received by Copeland Borough Council for period Week ending 17 July 2015 App No. 4/15/2300/0F1 Date Received 14/07/2015 Proposal PRIOR NOTIFICATION FOR PROPOSED DEMOLITION Case Officer Charlotte Brown Site GARAGE BLOCK, VICTORIA STREET, MILLOM Parish Millom Applicant Home Group Limited Address Anthorne House, Irish Street, MARYPORT, Cumbria CA15 8AB, FAO Mr Brian Patterson Agent Address App No. 4/15/2301/0F1 Date Received 14/07/2015 Proposal PRIOR NOTIFICATION OF PROPOSED DEMOLITION Case Officer Charlotte Brown Site GARAGE BLOCKS, PARK ROAD/COOK ROAD, MILLOM Parish Millom Applicant Home Group Limited Address Anthorne House, Irish Street, MARYPORT, Cumbria CA15 8AB, FAO Mr Brian Patterson Agent Address App No. 4/15/2302/0F1 Date Received 17/07/2015 Proposal PRIOR NOTIFICATION OF PROPOSED DEMOLITION Case Officer Nick Hayhurst Site UNITS 4, 8, 11, 12, 13, 19 LECONFIELD INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, CLEATOR MOOR Parish Cleator Moor Applicant Dunedin UK Industrial Property IVLP Address 89 Wardour Street, LONDON W1F 0UB, FAO Mr R Dixon Agent DTZ Address Central Square, Forth Street, NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE NE1 3PJ, FAO Mr J Stevenson Applications Received by Copeland Borough Council for period Week ending 17 July 2015 App No. 4/15/2303/0F1 Date Received 13/07/2015 Proposal CHANGE OF USE OF CHURCH HALL TO FOUR BEDROOMED DWELLING Case Officer Christie Burns Site ST CUTHBERTS CHURCH HALL, THE BANKS, SEASCALE Parish Seascale Applicant Mr P Gardener Address 12 Fairfield Grove, Murton, SEAHAM, County Durham SR79NB Agent Address App No. 4/15/2304/0O1 Date Received 13/07/2015 Proposal OUTLINE APPLICATION FOR THE ERECTION OF 6 NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Housing Supplementary Planning Document
    Draft Housing Supplementary Planning Document January 2019 Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................5 1.1 Purpose of the Housing Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) .............5 1.2 Status of the Housing SPD.............................................................................5 2 Affordable Housing..........................................................................6 2.1 What is Affordable Housing?..........................................................................6 2.2 How much Affordable Housing do developers need to provide? ...................8 2.3 Viability ...........................................................................................................9 2.4 Affordable Housing statement and viability appraisal.....................................9 2.5 What is a commuted sum and when is it required?......................................10 2.6 How is a commuted sum calculated?...........................................................10 2.7 When should a commuted sum be paid? .....................................................10 2.8 How are commuted sum payments used? ...................................................10 2.9 What is a rural exception site? .....................................................................11 2.10 Where is it acceptable for a rural exception site to be located?................12 2.11 How are Housing Needs Assessed?.........................................................13 2.12 What is a housing needs
    [Show full text]
  • Rural Land Management Impacts on Catchment Scale Flood Risk
    Durham E-Theses Rural Land Management Impacts on Catchment Scale Flood Risk PATTISON, IAN How to cite: PATTISON, IAN (2010) Rural Land Management Impacts on Catchment Scale Flood Risk, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/531/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk Durham University A Thesis Entitled Rural Land Management Impacts on Catchment Scale Flood Risk Submitted by Ian Pattison BSc (Hons) Dunelm (Grey College) Department of Geography A Candidate for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2010 Declaration of Copyright Declaration of Copyright I confirm that no part of the material presented in this thesis has previously been submitted by me or any other persons for a degree in this or any other University. In all cases, where it is relevant, material from the work of others has been acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Westmoreland in the Late Seventeenth Century by Colin Phillips
    WESTMORLAND ABOUT 1670 BY COLIN PHILLIPS Topography and climate This volume prints four documents relating to the hearth tax in Westmorland1. It is important to set these documents in their geographical context. Westmorland, until 1974 was one of England’s ancient counties when it became part of Cumbria. The boundaries are shown on map 1.2 Celia Fiennes’s view in 1698 of ‘…Rich land in the bottoms, as one may call them considering the vast hills above them on all sides…’ was more positive than that of Daniel Defoe who, in 1724, considered Westmorland ‘A country eminent only for being the wildest, most barren and frightful of any that I have passed over in England, or even Wales it self. ’ It was a county of stark topographical contrasts, fringed by long and deep waters of the Lake District, bisected by mountains with high and wild fells. Communications were difficult: Helvellyn, Harter Fell, Shap Fell and the Langdale Fells prevented easy cross-county movement, although there were in the seventeenth century three routes identified with Kirkstone, Shap, and Grayrigg.3 Yet there were more fertile lowland areas and 1 TNA, Exchequer, lay subsidy rolls, E179/195/73, compiled for the Michaelmas 1670 collection, and including Kendal borough. The document was printed as extracts in W. Farrer, Records relating to the barony of Kendale, ed. J. F. Curwen (CWAAS, Record Series, 4 & 5 1923, 1924; reprinted 1998, 1999); and, without the exempt, in The later records relating to north Westmorland, ed. J. F. Curwen (CWAAS, Record Series, 8, 1932); WD/Ry, box 28, Ms R, pp.1-112, for Westmorland, dated 1674/5, and excluding Kendal borough and Kirkland (heavily edited in J.
    [Show full text]