Lok Sabha Debates
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Monday, May 14, 1973 Fifth Series, No. 51 Vaisakha 24, 1895 (Saka) Lok Sabha Debates (Seventh Session) LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT New Delhi Price Rs-2.00 CONTENTS (Fifth i'f iu , Vo! \X V lll, 7th Session, 197Vi No 56— Monday May 14 mVVaisakha 24, J89S (57/Afl) Column Calling Attention to Matter o( Uigent Public Import- ance —Reported ^tationei v scandal m the State Bank of India, New Delhi . 1—19 Papers Laid on the T a b l e ........................................ 19—20, 23—28 Re Arrest oi Shri Jambuw.int Dhote 2 0 -23 Messages fiom Fajva Sabha 2 8 -2 9 Assent to Bills 29 Leave of Absence fiom the Sittings ol the House 29—30 Matters under Rule V 7 ~ (1) Rc~Pakistan ■> application to world court on question of Pnsoneis of War . 3 0 -3 1 (n) Harassment ot Agriculturists by Banks in T e l a n g a n a ................................................... 32 (m) Reported cut in Rice Quota for Calcutta, Durgapur e t c ................................................... B Rc Discussion on Pay Commission Report • 33—37 Statutoiy Resolution Re. Proclamation in relation to the State oi Manipur—Adopted 37—58 and Manipur State Legislature (Delegation of Poweis)BilJ Motion to Consider .... 37 Shri Mohanraj Kalmgarayar 37- 39 Shri Madhu Limaye 39 41 Shri K C Pant 44 53 Clauses 2, 3 and 1 53 Motion to Pass .... 53 Shri Madhu Limaye 53 55 Shri N. Tombi S i n g h ........................................ 5 5 - 56 Shri K C Pant . 5 6 -5 8 Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Bill . .. 58—143 Motion to Consider.................................................. 58 Cclumnj Shri S. Mohan Kumaramangalam 58-70 124-134 Shri Robin Sen 70-72 Shri K. D. Malaviya .... 73—76 Shri Indrajit Gupta 76—83 Shri Damodar Pantiey 83—90 Shri Mohanraj Kaiingarayar 90—92 Shri Jagannath Mishra 92—95 Shri P. M. Mehta 95—98 Shri Ramsingh Bhai Verma . 99—102 Shri Onkar Lai Berwa 102—104 Shri R. N. Sharma.... 104-108 Shri H. M. Patel .... 108-110 Shri S’ukhdeo Prasad Verma 110-113 Shri Dhan Shah Pradhan 113- 115 Shri S. N. Mishra.... 115—118 Shri Ram Deo Singh 118—120 Shri Chapalendu Bhattacharyyia 120—122 Shri Chandrika Prasad • . 122-124 Clauses 2 to 35, The Schedule and Clause 1 135-136 Motion to Pass, as amended 13 Shri Ram Chandra Vikal 136-137 Shri S. M. Banerjee 137-138 Shri P. M. Mehta 138 Shri K. S. Chavada .... 138 Shri Mohanraj Kaiingarayar 138 Shri B. R. Shukla .... 138-139 Shri Samar Guha .... 139- 141 Dr. K a i l a s ........................................ 141 Shri S. Mohan Kumaramangalam 141—143 Cinematograph (Amendment) Bill 143—149 Motion to Consider, as passed by Rajya Sabh 143 Shri Manoranjan Hazra 143—146 Shri Dharam Bir Sinha 146-147 Clauses 2 to 5 and 1 ... 148 Motion to pass, as amended * 149 Apprentices (Amendment) Bill 149—150 Motion to consider, as passed by Rajya Sab 149 Shri Raghunatha Reddy 149 Half-An-Hour Discussion Request by Confederation of Central Govern ment Officers’ Association to the Prime Minister for Fair Scrutiny of Pay Commissionn’s Report 150-172 Shri Bhogendra Jha » 152-157 Shri Yeshwantrao Chavan 165—172 LOK SABHA DEBATES 2 LOK SABHA (iv) furnishing of incorrect information in several cases to the Rates Committee Monday, May 14, ,1973/Vaisakha 24, 1895 for sanction of rates. (Saka) TheLok Sabha met at Eleven of the Clock On the basis of the report of the Chief [MR, SPEAKER in the Chair] Vigilance Officer, the bank has initiated departmental proceedings against three CALLING ATfENTION TO MATTER officers of the Stationery Department. OF URGENT PUBLIC IMPORTANCE Of the three, two have been placed' under REPORTED STATIONERY SCANDAL IN suspension by the bank. All the three STATE BANK OF INDIA, NEW DELHI Officers have been subsequently 'charge- sheeted by the bank and their explanations ?;{T 'iq f~ (~) : 31~&f ~T~<r, have been called for. The bank has also 'If' arfCfWGfiff<rm'fi -~q if; f;:n:'ff~fu~ called for the explanation of a few other fCf1'llf'fif 31T<::fern +f~f 'fiT c,<fR f~NT officers, who have been found responsible for certain other procedural irregularities ~ 3Th: 5rr~'fT q)'<:aT ~ fcn 'f~ ~~~ if and .Iapses in handling, purchase and l1:'fi crfCfOlT~': stocking of stationery. ";:r~ f~~f f~~ ~c: ~'t~31r:f) ~f~T The State Bank of India has reported 'fir PU'fr<r 'ITf19:Tif' 'i'fRf~ ~m that on the basis of the scrutiny conducted by it, out of the stationery of total value q)'1~<Sl'i ~r+rnf (~l/Tii<:f) 9iT t;~ of Rs. 114 lakhs purchased by the Regional 'fif~Cf 'CfTC:RT" Stationery Department, New Delhi, during THE MINISTER OF FINANCE the 'four years, the total amount of over (SHRI YESHWANTRAO CHAVAN): payments would be in the neighbourhood Mr. Speaker, Sir, the State Bank of India of Rs.:1 ·22 Iakhs-here, I have an addition- has reported that on receipt of, certain and over-stocking of 45 lakhs. complaints towards the end of 1971, re- lI;fT l1q f~q: 31&<f~ +r~T~<r, it<:T garding over-stocking and unsatisfactory handling of stationery at the Regional o!j"CR'~Tq)'T5i'lA" ~ I Stationery Department, New Delhi, it had asked its Chief Vigilance Officer at the New 31;1:f~ l1QRli Delhi Local Head Office, to make a thorough ~~I probe into the matter. The investigation by the Chief Vigilance Officer revealed the fol- '-'I'T ;f~ f~q : 'lfT qT'f!j"'lfT?T "iT ~r lowing irregularities :- ~, ~~ G"<:~ I (i) placing of orders for stationery in several cases in excess of actual require- 31;1:f~ 'iQ\"<{lf: "iU ~f<:;r I ments and in some cases of items which had become obsolete; lI;fT l1q f~q: ~~ <:1~rr 91"f >rf?fi1:fT (ii) effecting payments in some cases f'f!j"l1T if; 31i~5R 'i'fi>f'fr. 'i'f~, if' 2 3 for stationery received which had not been ordered for and in some other cases CfKf€l' ~ $fT~;:rTq)'<:<:~T~ I paying bills at rates higher than the appro- 31~1:f~il"QT<{lf afop q)'~ <:iF '~ ved rates; if' (iii) accepting in some Cases inferior 31rG"91"T+rl'1;Tf+r~lfT, ~ t1 qiifCiq)'~ I ' paper for printing, and for registers and ~ +iqf~q~ : q~ 31i>flforrCf ~ I ~~1:f envelopes, instead of good quality paper of approved weight ; and fq~ if; Gf~ if' 'lfT q)'~;:rr ~ ~ if' GfR, Stationery Scandal MAY 14, 1973 in S.BJ., New Delhi (CA) 4 3!®*w : ?rtjr «rn[7 arrs s n t r s r^ r ^ s t T^r f i anp: am *r£ | i w t ^ ^ ?ft $5 3TOTT I SfFtfTT jf fa f a f f 3im f ift <nmr ^rrf |, wt ^ spfar ?T^r 35RT I ^TT f i %ft x*m * 5f<f 8TRrr fa srrc «ft w flw 4 : srpT qrFqrr artT rr^rr vff wr^ £ i ^>r Sfft ^Trf £, H fazrm ^TcT fas w r ^6Rr 5snf^, sctft tft ^T5TT f , 3 fk ’sftsr ST^f I 3 7 6 aiW*pr^*T^t ? ^PT I *WW q$W : fafiTFTt % 3T»W *?^C0[: f?PTifT ^T?T 3T5T*r % ^ jft^r i t i ^rsra # ^{arrhpr *rm farr | f^ «rt w faw*: srrr ^ fa 4' sfr*tf srarr * ark ^ rr are^T if cw *rff¥ *frr cr> w ^5 srrairr i am; arrtr ^ ^ sm ^ttctt » arww *$t*qr: aft tft arre *»> |T TO fwr^ : 3TTT fw fw r w *sejfe%3T**fS$ < i w % arrr srt ^ ^ ^ £ l w an? ^ fjr for ozrt*4T wrr itwt 3RTf fair* :sprr arrr ®r^«rr ^ f ^rsm cr> ^ stt?t ^ ^ tt, 4 % 5 TR 'R ^w t^ MDrfrr? °p t t f a w f 4 s i 3TPT *Ic*T w:t t* f ? *ft ?rt ^rt^rrl % *rre H a r k sr«wr : 4 «ft f fo? WW % 3fT SR? SFf f?W*T | t 3W % srr vcvn %x v*b ^ s t ^rTcrr | aflr src fwrnjrcrn: s^r^rr ^rr shr- zs ^ ^st *p*?<rr |, srnm ^ m m 1 1 stpt 37 6%sr sftftra i ^rar* ^ tr^r ^nc^r =^ft ant I fa *sr snm w:t ? m ?> ?f5r fr^V 3»m ar*w : ah? I, stft src h aftr ^FT 3TC?R cT5f 5^r ^5FTT s«r SST?* I 3Tiw tit f r o ft ^rra^rr ^ «rt t o fww : 3f<R 3t pt # c^nfs: % ^ ^mriT qrsw vt p ; ?>’tt ^ r# srrfi arrir % ffcpr *T*rft wrrfw srift *ft 5rt i ^ afk faftrer ?tt^ fc*rr | ?rt #' 3s tsrrfrr §, w f*rwff ^1 ( 3FK W V t fft^TT ?T fa £ ^ f ® ^r *?rtf artf^r *tgt |, faipfr *pt sptf «Pf £ i * r ^ ?r$r |? ^ fan* : < 3 ^ 9TR; «ffTBT «R aiwwr : arprx^r ftrfareT % ^IST ^ ^RT $CT ( I 3PT 3* Wt ?£cnfe % 5TR- ifrsrff frr^rcrr O m **$% titfa * I | afa: ^ 3st ^ £ i 3?wwi?Sta«r f^m ^w qcTrt i *r^ fa** : 3TTOT *Fr SPOT ^HTcT «ft wfa^:3rrr^T*Ftf5w*r«w# ^ 5?n| itf^sfaswsm ^sm t i m x ?ft ? tfsw I arrr srffir ^ £ tft tf *s s rn rr g 5Tr ^ ^ ^rr ^rnrr f t w s t w w i tsft fa *m t ^ r % 3 T O ^ R r ? ^ f I | 3TPT 3 7 6 ^ ?TfcT 4i*F$5 ^ s r # srrr^r ^ *r^ srefar ?Rnrr a w r r vr qvr 2rr *#r? $arr | fa ^ r «rnia: an^c ^ (w iW f) ^swr wnrr i arrr fw arr 5 Stationery Scandal VAISAKHA 24, 1895 (SAKA) in S.BJ., New Delhi 6 (CA) flpr %r wt % aim w to fasrr | <r*» 'p w t f t o V f t fasraft irrroto e f f o r t i sft *nj faro*: sft 3n?r 5rrs^ft f t «ft *ra f m $ : arwrar *r§tro, t i arrr ?ft*f¥ f^TtT TTpft 3ft arfcfsq* fcp*fa | Ttfro fa =*nr # ^ riz snr, finrr to t «rr, ^ ^ OT^-sfto tfxnm rfa m sx # §to ^rrfr fr*rr §3rr TOr ^BT? »H[ *TSc5PT°T 9TPT t iTf fa f5T f^TT facT^r *q*r TT ^fferaT fSIT % I wrw : «rnt£ m 3fR> «pV wff *rr^r*r ?srr fa w t *- sr^ w ^? nft¥tg7cr^t i srnnc st pt ^frt ^>^r??:if«i*3T % 45 *rm %• ^ *rr^ | ?r> 3Tf tt^: q"y ^-irr i 3Tpr jfT? T? f I ^TT JTfT ^ ?>rr fa ^ its s f <rr =5R wrr sr??T | fa ^nr ^?r qfV ark f^TT $&rx\ tn: * ^ i m * pa ^r^rr «fr-w r % f^rr stpt art ? r^ *r atffat 5ftt <fter srw^rr cfr «ft i crcfar *rprr sriw i *nr tot 3T^5T *r$te*: fa?r ^JcT % farr 9 <r*far | fa **ft cnr ^fr ^Tcrr v m t, sr*r wt »sre*r *fiT fror 3tht5R «ft f s w ^ : *rsft % TOPT apt jfr srfr ?mft ?rf, to f # fa-fror *> f w % «tr ^ «Tf7^r ^"t t o # srrr |, ■?tT % srrc *rFr?fta *k f t ^ *ffa r T^RTrr ^ft «rt* t qprr ssjfre dm apt f* m r, aft f® ^ r *ft s 's fit ?ft % «rrc ^ricT * ^ r t ^ «ft 3 fk ^ n r Jr ^srrffcT ?3 T **W f I ^ ?ft fa faff 4 5 TO ^>TO % «ft *T£J f*PT$ : s^r^rsRT X&T W ?TTO % m*R Tr tor- # 9 ^ ^ m , wg ^■jteprr^rsvarr i ^ spt srq-^ «ri7r*T ^ t t s ^k<t 5 ? arrr ir> ?*T 5W«IT % 73^T ^tfalT i *WWI «f?t5W : 3TTT 3«T W ^5T # i iHY »Tjstrr ^ ^ r sr^rrar s t o i MR SPfcAKER The Minister has got the right.