Saratoga National Historical Park

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Saratoga National Historical Park National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Saratoga National Historical Park Draft General Management Plan Draft Environmental Impact Statement 2003 Saratoga National Historical Park STILLWATER AND SARATOGA, NEW YORK Draft General Management Plan and Draft Environmental Impact Statement Prepared by: Northeast Region, Boston Office Saratoga National Historical Park 2003 “At Saratoga, the British campaign that was supposed to crush America’s rebellion ended instead in a surrender that changed the history of the world.” Richard Ketchum Author of Saratoga A MESSAGE FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT I am pleased to announce that the draft general management plan/draft environmental impact state­ ment for Saratoga National Historical Park is now available for your review and comment. The docu­ ment describes the resource conditions and visitor experience that should exist at Saratoga National Historical Park over the long term. It presents a range of alternatives and assesses the potential envi­ ronmental and socioeconomic effects of the alternatives on park resources, visitor experience, and surrounding area. As Superintendent, I can assure you that the challenges facing park managers become more complex and varied each year. It is easy to get caught up in these pressing day-to-day issues. That is why the National Park Service seeks to have each park update its plan every 15 or 20 years. It forces us to step back and re-think fundamental questions such as the park's mission and significance, and analyze how to respond to changes facing us. This is not to say we must discard everything that has been done or make changes for change’s sake. The Park Service’s core mission of preserving America’s treasures should never change. The historic events that took place here will always be significant, although they may be reinterpreted over time. The draft plan describes four management options, one of them being our preferred alternative. We hope that this plan, and especially its preferred alternative, will achieve the right balance between permanence and change, between preservation and public use. Your involvement has been vital to this process. Since the start of planning, we have absorbed ideas and advice from many sources. A park like Saratoga has a large constituency, locally, nationally, and even internationally; and we value your input. We invite your comments on this draft plan. The document will be available for public review for 60 days, over which time we will accept written and oral comments. Please call, send a fax, write a letter, or e-mail your thoughts and suggestions. Include your name and address. Anonymous comments will not be considered. We may make comments, including names and home addresses of respon­ dents available for public review. If you wish to have your name and address withheld, please state so at the beginning of your comment. We will carefully review all substantive comments and incorpo­ rate them, as appropriate, in the final plan and final impact statement. Imagine that you are visiting Saratoga National Historical Park 20 years from now, and see whether the preferred alternative or any of the others provides a blueprint to create the kind of place you would like to see and the kind of experience you would like to have. Please share your thoughts so that our management of the park will continue to be a credit to its proud history. Doug Lindsay Superintendent Please submit comments to: Superintendent Saratoga National Historical Park 648 Route 32 Stillwater, NY 12170-1604 Comments may be submitted electronically to: [email protected] For further information, please contact: Phone: (518) 664-9821 Fax: (518) 664-9830 Park Entrance Park Headquarters Park Maintenance Park Entrance Road K r o Visitor Center m a Lohnes Road K i l l 1 7 To Old Saratoga (Schuylerville) 6 5 Tour Road G r e 10 US4 32 a t R a Tour Stop 8 v 4 i n e 9 M Entrance i l at US Rte. 4 Tour Road l C r e e k 2 Champlain Canal 32 n i a l p d Bemis 3 k o e o Park Boundary e l (Legislative) Heights r F C s r D n e e a v v i c i i l s e r R H A m o n l o l o s w d H u N r R i v e s o n US4 H u d 32 0 1000 ft 3000 ft approx. scale orthophoto date: 2000 Draft GMP 2003 Saratoga National Historical Park United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Saratoga National Historical Park: Battlefield Unit SARATOGA MONUMENT Park Boundary (Legislative) Burgoyne St. ve Cemetery A VICTORY WOODS 32 h C r e e k Field of F i s Grounded Arms Schuyler House New York DOT Yard/ Canal Corporation SCHUYLER ESTATE Park Boundary 29 (Legislative) e r R i v N o n d s H u US4 0 300 ft 1000 ft Draft GMPapprox. 2003 scale To the Battlefield Unit orthophoto date: 2000 Saratoga National Historical Park United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Saratoga National Historical Park: Old Saratoga Unit Table of Contents Executive Summary Part One: Background Introduction 1 Historical Overview 3 Overview of Park Resources 19 Purpose and Significance of Saratoga National Historical Park 30 Goals 31 Interpretive Themes 32 Need for the Plan 33 Related Plans and Programs 37 Part Two: The Alternatives and Their Common Elements Laws, Policies, and Mandates 43 Objectives (or Management Prescriptions) Common to All Alternatives 48 The Alternatives 58 Part Three: Affected Environment Overview 95 Cultural Resources 95 Natural Resources 104 Visitor Experience 114 Park Operations and Facilities 123 Hazardous Materials 129 Socioeconomic Environment 130 Impact Topics Eliminated from Further Evaluation 133 Part Four: Environmental Consequences Introduction 139 Methodology for Analyzing Impacts 140 Impairment of Resources 141 Impacts of Actions Common to All Alternatives 145 Impacts of Actions Associated with Alternative A 161 Impacts of Actions Associated with Alternative B 171 Impacts of Actions Associated with Alternative C 184 Impacts of Actions Associated with Alternative D 196 Part Five: Consultation and Coordination Summary of Planning 207 Compliance with Federal and State Laws and Regulations 208 List of Draft General Management Plan Recipients 211 List of Preparers 213 Part Six: Appendices Appendix A: Park Legislation 217 Appendix B: Socioeconomic Impact Analysis 222 Appendix C: Glossary 245 Appendix D: Research Undertaken in Support of Planning 249 Appendix E: Visitor Experience and Resource Protection (Carrying Capacity) 250 Appendix F: List of Classified Structures 252 Appendix G: Selected Resources Consulted 256 List of Tables Table 1: Summary of Alternative A 64 Table 2: Summary of Alternative B 68 Table 3: Summary of Alternative C 74 Table 4: Summary of Alternative D 80 Table 5: Summary of Objectives, Potential Boundary Modifications, and Cost Estimates for the Alternatives 87 Table 6: Criteria for Impact Intensities 142 Table 7: Ranking of Resources 144 Table 8: Summary of Impacts Common to All Alternatives 158 Table 9: Summary of Impacts Associated with Alternative A 169 Table 10: Summary of Impacts Associated with Alternative B 181 Table 11: Summary of Impacts Associated with Alternative C 193 Table 12: Summary of Impacts Associated with Alternative D 202 List of Figures The Northern Campaign — 1777 5 First Battle of Saratoga 11 Second Battle of Saratoga 13 Burgoyne’s Army Trapped in Saratoga 15 Upper Hudson River Valley 21 Park Vicinity and Associated Sites 23 Park Map 25 Management Zones 61 Battlefield Monuments and Markers 99 Sensitive Natural Resource Areas 107 Prime Agricultural Soils 109 Executive Summary Executive Summary PURPOSE OF THE PLAN The main function of a general management plan is to define clearly the park’s purpose and management direction. The general man­ agement plan provides a foundation to guide and coordinate all subse­ quent planning and management. The general management plan takes the long view, 15–20 years into the future. The National Park Service seeks to have each park operating under approved general management plans. This ensures that park managers carry out, as effectively and efficiently as possible, the mission of the National Park Service. MAKING DECISIONS Three years ago, the National Park Service planning team began to gather ideas from interested citizens about how best to manage Saratoga National Historical Park. The team held public meetings and published newsletters to get the word out about the plan and to get feed­ back on various plan components. Based on an extensive analysis of resources and the public input received, the team shaped four manage­ ment alternatives. One, Alternative D, has been selected as the Preferred Alternative. Alternative D has also been identified as the environmental­ ly Preferred Alternative. The four alternatives, along with the foundation pieces that guided their formation, are summarized on the following pages. THE MISSION: TO PRESERVE AND PROTECT The foundation for the general management plan rests on the park’s purpose and significance statements. These statements are based on the park’s authorizing legislation and its legislative history. The pur­ poses state why the park was established as a unit of the national park system. Park significance defines the park’s place within its broader national context. Park Purpose Saratoga National Historical Park preserves and protects sites associated with the battles, siege, and surrender of British forces at Saratoga, which were decisive events in the winning of American inde­ pendence. The park interprets these and other sites, events, and people associated with the 1777 military campaign in the Champlain-Hudson and Mohawk valleys (also known as the Burgoyne Campaign). Park Significance Saratoga National Historical Park: · Honors the participants and preserves the battlegrounds where a major British mil­ itary offensive in 1777 ended in a surrender that heartened the patriot cause and i Saratoga National Historical Park brought about the international recognition and aid essential to securing our nation’s freedom.
Recommended publications
  • Redemption Found Believers Can Trust God to Be Faithful to Them
    Session 3 | Job 19:19-29 Redemption Found Believers can trust God to be faithful to them. New York’s Saratoga National Historical Park contains an unusual statue. It is a stone monument featuring a military commander’s single boot. The monument’s inscription lauds but does not name the “most brilliant soldier of the Continental Army” who received a severe leg wound at the Battle of Saratoga. The unnamed commander’s hard-hitting attack at Saratoga routed the British army and assured an American victory in the battle. That victory helped convince France to enter the Revolutionary War on the side of the American colonies. French support ultimately tipped the scales in the Continental Army’s favor, leading to America’s long-sought independence. The boot monument pays tribute to this unnamed colonial soldier’s leg wound received while leading a final, victorious charge. So why has this man been denied the mark of respect due a military hero? Why was the commander’s name not engraved on the monument that honored his valor? The answer is because the soldier’s name was Benedict Arnold, a name that has become synonymous with treason. By the early summer of 1780, Arnold was a recognized national hero. He held the rank of Major General in the United States Army and had an unrivaled war record. George Washington considered Arnold to be one of his most dependable military leaders and named him the commander of the critical fort at West Point, New York. Regrettably, it was there that a disgruntled Arnold entered into secret negotiations with the British army to surrender the fort.
    [Show full text]
  • Continuation Sheet Historic District Branford, Connecticut
    NPS Form 10-900 OUB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. 8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NOV 1 4 1988 National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NATIONAL REGISTER This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the instructions. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900a). Type all entries. 1. Name of Property_________________________________________________ historic name other names/site number Stony Creek/Thimble Islands Historic District 2. Location street & number See continuation sheets I I not for publication city, town Branford T I vicinity" stateConnecticut code 09 county New Haven code 009 zip code 06405 3. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property |X2l private I I building(s) Contributing Noncontributing lot public-local |X}| district 14.1 buildings I I public-State Flsite 1 sites I I public-Federal I I structure structures I I object . objects 355 142 Total Name of related multiple property listing: Number of contributing resources previously N/A _____________________ listed in the National Register 1____ 4. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this [x~l nomination EH request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • According to Wikipedia 2011 with Some Addictions
    American MilitMilitaryary Historians AAA-A---FFFF According to Wikipedia 2011 with some addictions Society for Military History From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The Society for Military History is an United States -based international organization of scholars who research, write and teach military history of all time periods and places. It includes Naval history , air power history and studies of technology, ideas, and homefronts. It publishes the quarterly refereed journal titled The Journal of Military History . An annual meeting is held every year. Recent meetings have been held in Frederick, Maryland, from April 19-22, 2007; Ogden, Utah, from April 17- 19, 2008; Murfreesboro, Tennessee 2-5 April 2009 and Lexington, Virginia 20-23 May 2010. The society was established in 1933 as the American Military History Foundation, renamed in 1939 the American Military Institute, and renamed again in 1990 as the Society for Military History. It has over 2,300 members including many prominent scholars, soldiers, and citizens interested in military history. [citation needed ] Membership is open to anyone and includes a subscription to the journal. Officers Officers (2009-2010) are: • President Dr. Brian M. Linn • Vice President Dr. Joseph T. Glatthaar • Executive Director Dr. Robert H. Berlin • Treasurer Dr. Graham A. Cosmas • Journal Editor Dr. Bruce Vandervort • Journal Managing Editors James R. Arnold and Roberta Wiener • Recording Secretary & Photographer Thomas Morgan • Webmaster & Newsletter Editor Dr. Kurt Hackemer • Archivist Paul A.
    [Show full text]
  • Rogers Island Bicycle Loop South Shore Rd
    327 Terrebonne SStt.. 158 Bois-des-Filion LLaawwrreennccee RRiivveerr 132 Pointe-aux-Trembles Varennes Saint-Amable 116 125 224 Sainte-Thérèse 50 148 Rosemère Montréal-Est 40 15 Saint-Hyacinthe 640 138 440 25 223 Sainte-Julie 20 344 Saint-Léonard Boucherville 229 40 Beloeil LLaaccddeess 148 OOuuttaarrddeess Laval-Ouest Mont-Saint-Hilaire 417 117 Ferry St-Valérien 344 13 116 Longueuil 137 La Montréal Route Ve Ottawa rte Ottawa Sainte-Marthe-sur-le-Lac Aéroport Saint-Basile-le-Grand RRiivveerr Mont-Royal Aéroport SSaaiinntt--HHuubbeerrtt Outremont Landmark Bridge Saint-Laurent ddee LLoonngguueeuuiill L'Île-Bizard Dollard-des-Ormeaux Greenfield 231 342 Aéroport International Westmount Park 133 Aéroport International Saint-Hubert PPiieerrrree--EElllliiootttt--TTrruuddeeaauu Saint-Lambert Saint-Mathias-sur-Richelieu RRiivveeiirree Côte YYaammaasskkaa ddee MM 30 Saint-Luc La Pierrefonds Pointe-Claire Route Verte Kirkland 20 Montréal-Ouest Verdun Brossard 235 233 Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue Lachine 134 Chambly 40 Beaconsfield Canton-de-Granby Lasalle 201 Terrasse-Vaudreuil La Prairie Vaudreuil-Dorion 10 112 L'Île-Perrot Candiac Notre-Dame-de-l'Île-Perrot 227 La Route Verte Route La 104 Pincourt 139 Maple 35 Saint-Constant Granby Grove Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu 132 338 Melocheville 340 Grande-Île Saint-Timothée 207 20 Farnham 30 104 325 Cartiers Jacques Rue 241 221 Montee de la Cannerie 15 Salaberry-de-Valleyfield 217 Rue Principale 223 236 Saint-Jean-Baptiste rand 401 Ch. G Bernier Eglise l’ 219 e 235 Rue d Cowansville 132 209 205 Mtee Blais 223 Rg. St. Jo se ph 133 203 202 201 138 Mont Guay 225 St.
    [Show full text]
  • RAO Bulletin Update 15 Oct 2007
    RAO BULLETIN 1 May 2011 Note: Anyone receiving this who does not want it request click on the automatic “Change address / Leave mailing list” tab at the bottom of the email containing this attachment. ================================================================================== THIS BULLETIN CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING ARTICLES == Mobilized Reserve 19 APR 2011 ----------------- (42 Decrease) == Gulf War Presumptive Disease [03] ----------- (VBA FAST ltr) == Tricare Young Adult Program [04] ----- (Open for Enrollment) == VA Medicare Subvention [04] --- (American Legion Supports) == VA Fiduciary Program [01] ---------------- (Right to Challenge) == VA Individual Unemployability ----------- (VA Form 21-4140) == Vet Jobs [26] ---------------------- (WA State Hiring Preference) == Alaska Veterans Museum --------------------------- (Now Open) == VAMC Marion IL [02] ----------- (Surgery Suspension Lifted) == VA Minority Veterans Care -- (Significant Differences Persist) == Traumatic Brain Injury [17] ------------- (Purple Heart Denials) == National Resource Directory [01] ---------- (NRD Mobile Site) == Virginia Vet Cemetery [02] ----- (SW Virginia Vet Cemetery) == DFAS myPay System [09] --------------------- (Login Changes) == Quilts of Valor ----------------------------- (VA Temporary Ban) == Inchon Landing Wolmi Lawsuit ----- (No Response from U.S.) == Feres Doctrine [03] -------- (Vets challenge Malpractice Shield) == VA Benefits [02] ---------------------- (Don‘t Assume Anything) == PTSD [64] ---------------------------- (Mobile App PTSD
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Edward / Rogers Island History and Timeline
    HISTORY OF FORT EDWARD AND ROGERS ISLAND The present village of Fort Edward, New York, was called “The Great Carrying Place” because it was the portage between the Hudson River and Lake Champlain. The first recorded military expedition to have passed through the Great Carrying Place, led by Major General Fitz-John Winthrop, occurred in 1690. The following year, Peter Schuyler led another expedition against Canada. The first fortification to have been built in Fort Edward was under the command of Colonel Francis Nicholson in 1709, during the conflict known as “Queen Anne’s War.” Fort Nicholson was garrisoned by 450 men, including seven companies of “regulars in scarlet uniform from old England.” A crude stockade was built to protect storehouses and log huts. John Henry Lydius, a Dutch fur trader, came to the site of Fort Nicholson to construct a trading post in 1731. Lydius claimed this land under a title granted to the Rev. Dellius in 1696. According to a 1732 French map, the trading post may have been surrounded by storehouses and fortified. Lydius may also have built a sawmill on Rogers Island. It is unknown whether the Lydius post was destroyed and later reconstructed in 1745 when many French and Indian raids were being conducted on the Hudson River. Many Provincial troops arrived at the Great Carrying Place during July and August of 1755. Among these were the celebrated Rogers’ Rangers. Rogers Island became the base camp for the Rangers for about 2 ½ years during the French and Indian War. Many Ranger huts, a blockhouse, a large barracks complex, and a large smallpox hospital were constructed on Rogers Island between 1756 and 1759.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    1 An Uncommon Defense (1607–1775) Introduction On September 24, 1759, a force of nearly 150 men maneuvered in the marshy woods of North America. They included Indians, provincials, and regulars, although most of them possessed no formal military training. After entering Quebec, they gathered to the north- east of Missisquoi Bay for a “council of war.” Major Robert Rogers, their commander, addressed the gathering. Clothed in a green- jacket and bonnet, he stood over 6 feet tall. His face was marked by smallpox scars and gunpowder burns. His forehead revealed a line carved into his fl esh by a lead bullet. He spoke deliberately with few words, exhibiting a coolness that inspired confi dence in the weary men. Their line of retreat was cut off by their enemy, he announced, while an ambush awaited them ahead. Drawing upon his understanding of the terrain, he quickly designed a plan of action. Although the mission that he outlined seemed impossible, they voted to “prosecute our design at all adventures.” Modifying their route, Rogers guided them through the spruce bogs in the boreal forests. As they stepped into the cold, acidic water, the submerged branches, needles, roots, and logs tore their moccasins to shreds and left many of them barefoot. They marched abreast in a single “Indian fi le,” so as to prevent their enemy from tracking them. Their movement through theCOPYRIGHTED bogs continued for nine days an dMATERIAL culminated near the Saint-Francois River. T he men stood almost 6 miles away from their target, an Abenaki village on the other side of the waterway.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington County, New York Data Book
    Washington County, New York Data Book 2008 Prepared by the Washington County Department of Planning & Community Development Comments, suggestions and corrections are welcomed and encouraged. Please contact the Department at (518) 746-2290 or [email protected] Table of Contents: Table of Contents: ....................................................................................................................................................................................... ii Profile: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Location & General Description .............................................................................................................................................................. 1 Municipality ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Physical Description ............................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Quality of Life: ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 5 Housing .................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Hudson River Access Plan Poughkeepsie to Rensselaer
    2020 HUDSON RIVER ACCESS PLAN POUGHKEEPSIE TO RENSSELAER FINAL REPORT GEORGE STAFFORD MARCH 2020 Photo courtesy of Jeanne Casatelli ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Hundreds of individuals, elected officials, agencies and organizations have contributed to the development of this document through their words and actions. They include: • People passionate about improved access to the Hudson River who attended public meetings, provided more than 1,000 comments and 5,000 votes on places where they use or wish to use the river, and have been directly involved in keeping access points open by taking part in cleanups along the shorelines and other activities. • Elected federal, state and local officials from Poughkeepsie to Rensselaer who provided letters and resolutions contained in this report, participated in phone interviews, facilitated public meeting sites, and elevated the importance of saving and increasing access points through their support of local plans and reports issued in recent years. • Individuals and organizations who collaborated on the Hudson River Access Forum that issued “Between the Railroad and the River—Public Access Issues and Opportunities along the Tidal Hudson.” This 1989 publication remains extremely relevant. • Finally, we wish to thank Matthew Atkinson, who authored “On the Wrong Side of the Railroad Tracks: Public Access to the Hudson River” (1996) for the Pace Environmental Law Review. This work provides a phenomenal review of the public trust doctrine and the legal principles governing the railroads’ obligation to provide river access. Mr. Atkinson’s advice during the development of this document proved invaluable. CONTACT / PRIMARY AUTHORS CONTACT Jeffrey Anzevino, AICP Director of Land Use Advocacy Scenic Hudson, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Saratoga County Official Directory
    Saratoga County New York 2021 Official County, Town, City & Village Officers Directory Saratoga County A Brief History By Lauren Roberts, County Historian Saratoga County was formed from lands previously belonging to Albany County on February 7, 1791. These lands included most of the Kayaderosseras Patent granted by Queen Anne to 13 of her “loving subjects” in 1708. Saratoga County occupies an important geographical position; bounded on the north and east by the Hudson River and the south by the Mohawk River, the confluence of these two great waterways have made the County a prime destination in times of both war and peace. The northwestern portion of the county is a mountainous area located within the Adirondack Park, while many important rivers and streams such as the Sacandaga and Kayaderosseras dominate the fertile valley areas. The diverse geography of this County has made it appealing to many different people who have chosen to call Saratoga County home. The Mohawks of the Iroquois Confederacy used this area as hunting and fishing grounds before the Europeans settled here. Many waterways and well-worn Native American trails were used during the French and Indian War (1755-1763) and during the American Revolution. In the Fall of 1777 British troops led by General John Burgoyne were headed south along the Hudson River when they encountered a large number of Americans entrenched at Bemis Heights. After two battles, the Americans were victorious and General Burgoyne surrendered to the Americans, led by General Horatio Gates on October 17, 1777. The Battle of Saratoga became famously known as the turning point of the American Revolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Studies 7: Inquiry Based Lesson Compelling Question: Should a Traitor Be Erased from History?
    Social Studies 7: Inquiry Based Lesson Compelling Question: Should a traitor be erased from history? Using primary and secondary sources students will participate in a day long activity where they will culminate in making the decision of whether or not Benedict Arnold has earned his place on the Saratoga Monument and if he should be named on the boot monument. Anticipatory Set (5 minutes) Begin the class by displaying the two attached websites and reading through them with the class Visit the attached website to read the background on the famous monument to Arnold’s leg: http://www.pbs.org/ktca/liberty/popup_arnoldsleg.html Visit the attached website to read the background on the Saratoga Monument: http://www.nps.gov/sara/learn/photosmultimedia/saratoga-monument-virtual-tour-part-3.htm Print out enough of the images for each student to have one. Pass out the images of the two different monuments. Stations Activity (35 minutes) Set up your classroom with five different stations. One will need to have access to electronic equipment able to play a youtube video clip. Print out enough copies of each of the stations activity information sheets for each student to have one to look at when they are at the station. (Class of 20, 5 stations, 4 copies needed) Label the stations with numbers and put the copies in the middle of the table. Print out enough of the questions packets for each student to have one. Set up a timer where students will have roughly 7 minutes at each station. If they aren’t quite finished, have them move along anyway.
    [Show full text]
  • French & Indian War Bibliography 3.31.2017
    BRITISH, FRENCH, AND INDIAN WAR BIBLIOGRAPHY Detre Library & Archives, Heinz History Center 1. ALL MATERIALS RELATED TO THE BRITISH, FRENCH AND INDIAN WAR (APPENDIX A not included) 2. FORTS/FORTIFICATIONS 3. BIOGRAPHY/AUTOBIOGRAPHY 4. DIARIES/PERSONAL NARRATIVES/LETTERS 5. SOLDIERS/ARMS/ARMAMENTS/UNIFORMS 6. INDIAN CAPTIVITIES 7. INDIAN HISTORY AND CULTURE 8. FRENCH AND INDIAN WAR HISTORIES 9. PONTIAC’S CONSPIRACY/LORD DUNMORE’S WAR 10. FICTION 11. ARCHIVAL APPENDIX A (Articles from the Western Pennsylvania Historical Magazine and Pittsburgh History) 1. ALL MATERIALS RELATED TO THE BRITISH, FRENCH AND INDIAN WAR A Brief History of Bedford Village; Bedford, Pa.; and Old Fort Bedford. • Bedford, Pa.: H. K. and E. K. Frear, 1961. • qF157 B25 B853 1961 A Brief History of the Colonial Wars in America from 1607 to 1775. • By Herbert T. Wade. New York: Society of Colonial Wars in the State of New York, 1948. • E186.3 N532 No. 51 A Brief History of the King’s Royal Rifle Corps. • Edited by Sir Edward T. H. Hutton. Winchester: Printed by Warren and Son, Ltd., 1912. • UA652 K5 H9 A Charming Field For An Encounter: The Story of George Washington’s Fort Necessity. • By Robert C. Alberts. National Park Service, 1975. • E199 A33 A Compleat History of the Late War: Or Annual Register of Its Rise, Progress, and Events in Europe, Asia, Africa and America. • Includes a narrative of the French and Indian War in America. Dublin: Printed by John Exshaw, M.DCC.LXIII. • Case dD297 C736 A Country Between: The Upper Ohio Valley and Its Peoples 1724-1774.
    [Show full text]