It Is Hereby Notified

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

368 No. 416. ^THE HOTELS (CONDITIONS OF SERVICE) REGULATIONS, 1953. - THE HOTELS CONDITIONS OF SERVICE COMMITTEE. Appointment under Regulation 3 (2). It is hereby notified that in exercise of the powers vested in him by paragraph 2 of Regulation 3 of the Hotels (Conditions of Service) Regulations, 1953, His Excellency the Governor has been pleased to appoint Mr. Andreas Michael Ombashi to be a member of the Hotels Conditions of Service Committee as from the 8th June, 1954, in the place of Mr. Nicos Theodotou, appointed as a member of the said Committee under Notifi• cation No. 178 published in Supplement No. 3 to the Gazette of the 2nd April, 1953. (M.P. 643/46.) No. 417. THE FOREST REGULATIONS, 1940 TO 1942. NOTICE UNDER REGULATION 8 (2) (b). It is hereby notified under sub-paragraph (b) of paragraph (2) of Regula• tion 8 of the Forest Regulations, 1940 to 1942, that rules for the management of the undermentioned Village Fuel Areas have been made by the Village Commissions concerned and approved by the Commissioner of Famagusta and have been posted up in a conspicuous place to the villages affected thereby:— Ayia Napa. Lefkoniko. Ayia Trias. Marathovouno. Ayios Theodhoros. Milea. Angastina. Peristerona. Kondea. Piyi. Kouklia. Syngrasis. Lapathos. ~ Yialousa. O. F. MUFTIZADE, Assistant Commissioner, Famagusta, for Commissioner of Famagusta. ijth June, 1954. (M.P. 1490/53.) No. 418. \/ NOTIFICATION UNDER THE TREE PLANTING (VILLAGE AREAS) LAW. CAP. 175. AKANTHOU (FAMAGUSTA) FUND. In exercise of the powers vested in me by section 17 of the Tree Planting (Village Areas) Law, I hereby establish a fund for the village of Akanthou in the District of Famagusta (hereinafter called the " Fund ") into which shall be paid all fines recovered under the said Law for offences committed within the Tree Planting Area of the village of Akanthou as described in the Order of the Commissioner of Famagusta published in Supplement No. 3 of the Cyprus Gazette No. 3761 of the 3rd June, 1954, under Notification 359. The Fund shall be under the management and control of the Com• missioner of Famagusta for the time being. The money in the Fund shall be utilized for works of public utility in the village of Akanthou. O. F. MUFTIZADE, Assistant Commissioner, Famagusta, for Commissioner of Famagusta. 19th June, 1954. (M.P. 1317/54.) .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Famagusta Debate
BRIEFING PAPER Number 7387, 16 November 2015 By Arabella Lang Famagusta debate Inside: 1. The Famagusta dispute 2. Cyprus settlement negotiations 3. Appendix www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary Number 7387, 16 November 2015 2 Contents Summary 3 1. The Famagusta dispute 4 1.1 Backbench business debate 4 1.2 What happened to Famagusta? 4 1.3 Proposals 5 2. Cyprus settlement negotiations 6 2.1 UN negotiations 6 Recent developments 6 Up to 2014 7 2.2 Cyprus-EU relations 8 2.3 Cyprus-UK relations 10 3. Appendix 12 3.1 European Parliament declaration 12 3.2 Security Council resolutions 12 Cover page image copyright: Chamber-070 by UK Parliament image. Licensed under CC BY 2.0 / image cropped. 3 Famagusta debate Summary The House of Commons is debating a Backbench Business motion on Famagusta on 16 November 2015. It calls for the Cypriot city of Famagusta to be returned by Turkey to its ‘lawful inhabitants’. After the Turkish invasion of Cyprus in 1974, Famagusta became part of the ‘Turkish Republic of North Cyprus’ (TRNC). The TRNC operates a large free port and zone at Famagusta, although the Republic of Cyprus has declared this closed. A section of Famagusta called Varosha has remained closed off by the Turkish military since 1974, becoming a ghost town. Famagusta is often seen as one of the keys to a permanent settlement for Cyprus and to unblocking Turkey’s stalled EU accession process. UN-sponsored negotiations for a permanent settlement for Cyprus restarted in 2015 following the election of a new leader in the TRNC.
[Show full text]
Dual Naming of Sea Areas in Modern Atlases and Implications for the East Sea/Sea of Japan Case
Dual naming of sea areas in modern atlases and implications for the East Sea/Sea of Japan case Rainer DORMELS* Dual naming is, to varying extents, present in nearly all atlases. The empirical research in this paper deals with the dual naming of sea areas in about 20 atlases from different nations in the years from 2006 to 2017. Objective, quality, and size of the atlases and the country where the atlases originated from play a key role. All these characteristics of the atlases will be taken into account in the paper. In the cases of dual naming of sea areas, we can, in general, differentiate between: cases where both names are exonyms, cases where both names are endonyms, and cases where one name is an endonym, while the other is an exonym. The goal of this paper is to suggest a typology of dual names of sea areas in different atlases. As it turns out, dual names of sea areas in atlases have different functions, and in many atlases, dual naming is not a singular exception. Dual naming may help the users of atlases to orientate themselves better. Additionally, dual naming allows for providing valuable information to the users. Regarding the naming of the sea between Korea and Japan present study has achieved the following results: the East Sea/Sea of Japan is the sea area, which by far showed the most use of dual naming in the atlases examined, in all cases of dual naming two exonyms were used, even in atlases, which allow dual naming just in very few cases, the East Sea/Sea of Japan is presented with dual naming.
[Show full text]
Cyprus Tourism Organisation Offices 108 - 112
CYPRUS 10000 years of history and civilisation CONTENTS CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 5 CYPRUS 10000 years of history and civilisation 6 THE HISTORY OF CYPRUS 8200 - 1050 BC Prehistoric Age 7 1050 - 480 BC Historic Times: Geometric and Archaic Periods 8 480 BC - 330 AD Classical, Hellenistic and Roman Periods 9 330 - 1191 AD Byzantine Period 10 - 11 1192 - 1489 AD Frankish Period 12 1489 - 1571 AD The Venetians in Cyprus 13 1571 - 1878 AD Cyprus becomes part of the Ottoman Empire 14 1878 - 1960 AD British rule 15 1960 - today The Cyprus Republic, the Turkish invasion, 16 European Union entry LEFKOSIA (NICOSIA) 17 - 36 LEMESOS (LIMASSOL) 37 - 54 LARNAKA 55 - 68 PAFOS 69 - 84 AMMOCHOSTOS (FAMAGUSTA) 85 - 90 TROODOS 91 - 103 ROUTES Byzantine route, Aphrodite Cultural Route 104 - 105 MAP OF CYPRUS 106 - 107 CYPRUS TOURISM ORGANISATION OFFICES 108 - 112 3 LEFKOSIA - NICOSIA LEMESOS - LIMASSOL LARNAKA PAFOS AMMOCHOSTOS - FAMAGUSTA TROODOS 4 INTRODUCTION Cyprus is a small country with a long history and a rich culture. It is not surprising that UNESCO included the Pafos antiquities, Choirokoitia and ten of the Byzantine period churches of Troodos in its list of World Heritage Sites. The aim of this publication is to help visitors discover the cultural heritage of Cyprus. The qualified personnel at any Information Office of the Cyprus Tourism Organisation (CTO) is happy to help organise your visit in the best possible way. Parallel to answering questions and enquiries, the Cyprus Tourism Organisation provides, free of charge, a wide range of publications, maps and other information material. Additional information is available at the CTO website: www.visitcyprus.com It is an unfortunate reality that a large part of the island’s cultural heritage has since July 1974 been under Turkish occupation.
[Show full text]
1 Memorandum Ownership Status of Hotels and Other
MEMORANDUM OWNERSHIP STATUS OF HOTELS AND OTHER ACCOMODATION FACILITIES IN THE OCCUPIED PART OF THE REPUBLIC OF CYPRUS The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Cyprus hereby publishes a list1 of hotels situated in the Turkish occupied part of Cyprus. The majority of these hotels belong to Greek Cypriot displaced persons who were forced to leave their properties following the Turkish invasion of 1974 or have been built illegally on properties belonging to displaced Greek Cypriots, in violation of the latter’s property rights and without their consent. A number of hotels belong to Turkish Cypriots or have been built on land belonging to Turkish Cypriots. The European Court of Human Rights, in its Judgment of 18 December 1996, on the individual application of the Greek Cypriot displaced owner from Kyrenia, Mrs. Titina Loizidou, against Turkey, and in the Fourth Interstate Application of Cyprus against Turkey of 10 May 2001, upheld the rights of the refugees to their properties. In the Loizidou case, the Court ordered the Government of Turkey to compensate the applicant for the time period of deprivation of use of her property and to provide full access and allow peaceful enjoyment of her property in Kyrenia. The right of the displaced owners to their properties was reconfirmed in the decision of the European Court of Human Rights (Dec. 2005) regarding the application of Myra Xenides- Arestis v. Turkey, and has since been repeatedly reconfirmed in a multitude of cases brought by Greek Cypriot owners of property in the occupied part of Cyprus against Turkey]. It should also be reminded that, according to the United Nations Principles on Housing and Property Restitution for Refugees and Displaced Persons (the Pinheiro principles) “all refugees and displaced persons have the right to have restored to them any housing, land or property of which they were arbitrarily or unlawfully deprived..”.
[Show full text]
Agia Napa Monastery
Agia Napa Monastery 1 The monastery of Agia Napa and its namesake village are located in the Famagusta district, in southeast Cyprus. The name Napa derives from the ancient Greek word “Napi”, which means wooded valley or canyon. The word is mentioned in Homer’s Iliad, in Pindar’s Pythian Odes, and later in the Christian hymnology. In the past, there was lush vegetation in that part of the Famagusta district, whereas in the area where the village and monastery exist today there used to be an idyllic wooded valley with springs. In ancient times there was a Greek city named Thronoi in that valley, and a temple dedicated to Aphrodite. With the advent of Christianity, the city declined and all that remained eventually was ruins. However, the valley with its dense forest and plentiful water supply became popular with hunters, who converged here in search of game. When the miraculous icon of Virgin Mary was found, the word spread quickly to the neighbouring villages and the cave in that remote valley became a shrine and a sacred pilgrimage for the Orthodox Christians of the area. That icon was named “The Icon of Agia Napa”, i.e. the icon of Virgin Mary of the Forest, and the shrine was named “Agia Napa”. The area around the Monastery was uninhabited until 1790, when a group of people arrived there, having fled Thessaloniki because of an outbreak of cholera. Of that group, only Nicholas Kemitzis and his son survived. The son later married a Cypriot girl from the village of Panagia, located in the hills north of the monastery, where the water of Agia Napa flows from.
[Show full text]
The Success Story of Cyprus Fact Sheet 3 - Projects and Infrastructure to Tackle Water Shortage
The Success Story of Cyprus Fact Sheet 3 - Projects and infrastructure to tackle water shortage WW Water demand & Quality Ag code of Public Treatment & Infrastructure Pricing Stakeholders supply control practice Acceptance reuse KEYS FOR SUCCESS – Lessons learned from the success stories of Cyprus and Israel SUWANU EUROPE is a H2020 project aiming to promote the effective exchange of knowledge, experience and skills among practitioners and relevant actors on the use of reclaimed water in agriculture. This factsheet is part of a total of 17 factsheets that describe the successful reclamation practices of Israel and Cyprus in order to learn and boost implementation of solutions adapted to the European context. Our ultimate goal is to enhance acceptance and awareness to an alternative source of an increasingly scarce resource, water. The increasing water demand for both irrigation and human consumption, during the past century, has led to the development of large infrastructure projects in Cyprus, such as: 1) dams (e.g. construction of over 100 dams with total storage capacity of 332 MCM of water), 2) urban wastewater treatment plants/water reclamation plants (UWTPs), 3) water reallocation projects (e.g. large conveyors/reservoirs and drilled boreholes for domestic and irrigation purposes) to store, process and transfer water throughout the island and specifically to supply adequate irrigation water to agricultural areas and 4) desalination plants (Water Development Department, 2019). The annual inflow of water to the Cypriot dams (Figure 1) for the years 1987-2017 are presented in Figure 2, with an average value of 79 MCM/year, while the annual water to the dams for the year 2016-2017 was 48.9 MCM.
[Show full text]
Pdf | 371.17 Kb
450000 E 500000 E 550000 E 600000 E 650000 32o 30' 33o 00' 33o 30' 34o 00' 34o 30' Cape Andreas 395000 N 395000 N HQ UNFICYP MEDITERRANEAN SEA ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﻷﻣﻢ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﳊﻔﻆ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ﰲ ﻗﱪﺹ Rizokarpaso 联塞部队部署 HQ UNPOL UNFICYP DEPLOYMENT FMPU Multinational Ayia Trias DÉPLOIEMENT DE L’UNFICYP Yialousa o o Vathylakas 35 30' 35 30' ДИСЛОКАЦИЯ ВСООНК MFR UNITED KINGDOM Sector 2 Leonarisso DESPLIEGUE DE L A UNFICYP HQ ARGENTINA Ephtakomi UNITED KINGDOM Galatia Cape Kormakiti SLOVAKIA Akanthou Komi Kebir UNPOL 500 m HQ Sector 1 Ardhana Karavas KYRENIA 500 m Kormakiti Lapithos Ayios Amvrosios Temblos Boghaz ARGENTINA / PARAGUAY / BRAZIL Dhiorios Myrtou 500 m Bellapais Trypimeni Trikomo ARGENTINA / CHILE 500 m 500 m Famagusta SECTOR 1 Lefkoniko Bay Sector 4 UNPOL VE WE K. Dhikomo Chatos WE XE HQ 390000 N UNPOL Kythrea 390000 N UNPOL VD WD ari WD XD Skylloura m Geunyeli Bey Keuy K. Monastir SLOVAKIA Mansoura Morphou am SLOVAKIA K. Pyrgos Morphou Philia Dhenia M Kaimakli Angastina Strovilia Post Kokkina Bay P. Zodhia LP 0 Prastio 90 Northing 9 Northing Selemant Limnitis Avlona UNPOL Pomos NICOSIA UNPOL 500 m Karavostasi Xeros UNPA Tymbou (Ercan) FAMAGUSTA UNPOL s s Cape Arnauti ti it a Akaki SECTOR 2 o Lefka r Kondea Kalopsidha Varosha Yialia Ambelikou n e o Arsos m m r a Khrysokhou a ro te rg Dherinia s t s Athienou SECTOR 4 e Bay is s ri SLOVAKIA t Linou A e P ( ) Mavroli rio P Athna Akhna 500 m u Marki Prodhromi Polis ko Evrykhou 500 m Klirou Troulli 1000 m S Louroujina UNPOL o o Pyla 35 00' 35 00' Kakopetria 500 mKochati Lymbia 1000 m DHEKELIA Ayia Napa Cape 500 m Pedhoulas SLOVAKIA S.B.A.
[Show full text]
“Borders/ Debordering”
“BORDERS/ DEBORDERING” number 83/84 • volume 21, 2016 EDITED BY HELENA MOTOH MAJA BJELICA POLIGRAFI Editor-in-Chief: Helena Motoh (Univ. of Primorska) Editorial Board: Lenart Škof (Univ. of Primorska), Igor Škamperle (Univ. of Ljubljana), Mojca Terčelj (Univ. of Primorska), Miha Pintarič (Univ. of Ljubljana), Rok Svetlič (Univ. of Primorska), Anja Zalta (Univ. of Ljubljana) Editorial Office: University of Primorska, Science and Research Centre, Institute for Philosophical Studies, Garibaldijeva 1, SI-6000 Koper, Slovenia Phone: +386 5 6637 700, Fax: + 386 5 6637 710, E-mail: [email protected] http://www.poligrafi.si number 83/84, volume 21 (2016) “BORDERS/DEBORDERING” TOWARDS A NEW WORLD CULTURE OF HOSPITALITY Edited by Helena Motoh and Maja Bjelica International Editorial Board: Th. Luckmann (Universität Konstanz), D. Kleinberg-Levin (Northwestern University), R. A. Mall (Universität München), M. Ježić (Filozofski fakultet, Zagreb), D. Louw (University of the Free State, Bloemfontain), M. Volf (Yale University), K. Wiredu (University of South Florida), D. Thomas (University of Birmingham), M. Kerševan (Filozofska fakulteta, Ljubljana), F. Leoncini (Università degli Studi di Venezia), P. Zovatto (Università di Trieste), T. Garfitt (Oxford University), M. Zink (Collège de France), L. Olivé (Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México), A. Louth (Durham University), P. Imbert (University of Ottawa), Ö. Turan (Middle-East Technical University, Ankara), E. Krotz (Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán / Universidad Autónoma de Metropolitana-Iztapalapa),
[Show full text]
Bishop Porfyrios of Neapolis of the Church of Cyprus
Speech of His Grace Bishop Porfyrios of Neapolis “Religious Freedom in the Republic of Cyprus” at the event: “Human Rights within the European Union” (05-12-2018). In July 1974, as many of you will know, Turkey invaded Cyprus with a large military force, taking advantage of the coup d’état carried out by the military junta in Greece against Archbishop Makarios III, the elected President of the Republic of Cyprus. On August 16, the fighting stopped but 43 years on, the wounds to body of the island have still not healed. Some 37% of its territory remains occupied by the Turkish army, which maintains a force of 40,000 soldiers there. In so doing, it has made Cyprus one of the most heavily militarised places in the world. Some 180,000 Greek Cypriots were expelled from their homes and properties. Today, around 500 remain enclaved in the Karpas peninsula and the Maronite villages. In November 1983, the occupation regime declared the independence of the so-called “Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus”, in a move that was condemned by the United Nations Security Council. No other country, apart from Turkey, has recognised the illegal entity. As a result of the invasion, Christian monuments and those of other faiths, sacred and archaeological sites were desecrated, looted and destroyed. Everything that adorned the 575 Orthodox churches in the occupied areas was stolen. Some 20,000 holy icons, wall paintings, mosaics, gospels, sacred vessels, manuscripts, old books, iconostases and, generally speaking, anything that could be stolen for material gain was looted and sold abroad.
[Show full text]
IDEOGRAMS and SUPPLEMENTALS and REGIONAL INTERACTION AMONG AEGEAN and CYPRIOTE SCRIPTS* in This Paper I Wish to Discuss Several
IDEOGRAMS AND SUPPLEMENTALS AND REGIONAL INTERACTION AMONG AEGEAN AND CYPRIOTE SCRIPTS * In this paper I wish to discuss several major mysteries which still surround the development and spread of scripts in the middle A preliminary version of this article was delivered as a paper at the 6th International Colloquium on Aegean Prehistory which met in Athens August 30-Sepcember 5, 1987. I thank Jean-Pierre Olivier, lngo Pini and Edith Porada for reading the penultimate ve rsion and for making suggestions and corrections, parricularly in regard to the sign repertories of Linear A and B and the discussion of seals and sealings in notes 4 and 6, which have improved this final version. I am solely responsible for any shortcomings which remain. Ellen Davis kindly arranged for me to receive clear copies of photos of objects in the Cesnola Collection of the Metropolitam Museum of Art in New York. Nicolle Hirschfeld supplied a new, more accurate drawing of Enkomi 16.63, as part of her current work on Cypro-Minoan pottery marks. She also confirmed that Enkomi 4025 is a true osrrakon insc ription. We both thank Ors. Vassos Karageorghis and !no Nicolaou for permitting and facilitating this work. I use the following references and abbreviations: 2 Cesnola Atlas III : L. Palma di Cesnola, A Descriptive Atlas of the Cesnola Collection of Cypn·ote Antiquities in the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York 2 III , New York 1894 ; CM = Cypro-Minoan; CS = Cypriote Syllabic Script ; Cyprominoica: E. Masson, Cyprominoica, SIMA 31:2, Goteborg 1974 ; Cyprus-Crete. Acts of the International Archaeological Symposium «The Relations between Cyprus and Crete, ca.
[Show full text]
2930R61E UNFICYP Nov06.Ai
450000 E 500000 E 550000 E 600000 E 650000 32o 30' 33o 00' 33o 30' 34o 00' 34o 30' Cape Andreas 395000 N HQ UNFICYP 395000 N MEDITERRANEAN SEA HQ UNPOL Rizokarpaso FMPU Multinational LO Karpas Post HQ Sector 2 Ayia Trias MFR Multinational Yialousa 35o 30' 35o 30' UNITED KINGDOM Vathylakas ARGENTINA Leonarisso UNPOL Ephtakomi SLOVAKIA Galatia Cape Kormakiti HQ Sector 1 Akanthou Komi Kebir 500 m Ardhana Karavas KYRENIA 500 m ARGENTINA Ayios Amvrosios Kormakiti Boghaz Lapithos Temblos HQ Sector 4 500 m Bellapais Trypimeni Dhiorios Myrtou Trikomo 500 m 500 m Famagusta ARGENTINA UNPOL Lefkoniko Bay SLOVAKIA / HUNGARY (-) K K. Dhikomo Chatos M . VE WE Bey Keuy WE XE 000 an P Skylloura 000 390 N so y ri Kythrea 390 N Ko u r VD WD a WD kk r g Morphou m Geunyeli K. Monastir UNPOL in a o SECTOR 1 m SLOVAKIA a s Bay a Strovilia Post Philia M Kaimakli LO Limnitis s Morphou Dhenia Angastina Prastio ro 0 90 Northing Selemant e Avlona 9 Northing X P. Zodhia UNPOL Pomos K. Trimithia NICOSIA Tymbou (Ercan) FAMAGUSTA 500 m Karavostasi UNPA s UNPOL s Cape Arnauti Lefka i Akaki SECTOR 2 o FMPU Multinational u it a Kondea Kalopsidha Khrysokhou Yialia iko r n Arsos m Varosha UNPOL el e o a b r g Bay m a m e UNPOL r Dherinia A s o t Athienou SECTOR 4 e is tr s t Linou 500 m s ri P Athna (Akhna) Mavroli rio A e 500 m u P Marki Prodhromi Polis ko Evrykhou Klirou Louroujina Troulli Paralimni 1000 m S 35o 00' o Pyla Ayia Napa 35 00' Kakopetria 500 mKochati Lymbia 1000 m DHEKELIA Cape 500 m Pedhoulas S.B.A.
[Show full text]
Stud Books Εγκεκριμένα Από Την Διεθνή Επιτροπή Stud Book
ΚΥΠΡΙΑΚΟ ΒΙΒΛΙΟ ΓΕΝΕΑΛΟΓΙΑΣ ΚΑΙ ΑΝΑΠΑΡΑΓΩΓΗΣ ΤΟΜΟΣ ΤΕΤΑΡΤΟΣ 2000 - 2004 ΕΚΔΟΣΗ 2005 THE CYPRUS STUD BOOK VOLUME IV 2000 - 2004 ISSUED IN 2005 ΠΕΡΙΕΧΟΜΕΝΑ ΚΑΝΟΝΙΣΜΟΙ ΣΥΝΤΟΜΟΓΡΑΦΙΑ ΟΝΟΜΑΤΩΝ ΚΡΑΤΩΝ ΕΥΡΕΤΗΡΙΟ ΤΟΚΑΔΕΣ ΜΕ ΤΑ ΠΡΟΪΟΝΤΑ ΤΟΥΣ ΚΑΤΑΛΟΓΟΣ ΕΠΙΒΗΤΟΡΩΝ ΚΑΤΑΛΟΓΟΣ ΕΙΣΑΧΘΕΝΤΩΝ AΛΟΓΩΝ ΚΑΤΑΛΟΓΟΣ ΕΞΑΧΘΕΝΤΩΝ ΑΛΟΓΩΝ ΠΡΟΣΘΕΤΑ ΟΝΟΜΑΤΑ ΠΡΟΗΓΟΥΜΕΝΩΝ ΤΟΜΩΝ ΠΑΡΟΡΑΜΑΤΑ ΚΑΙ ΣΥΜΠΛΗΡΩΜΑΤΑ ΠΡΟΗΓΟΥΜΕΝΩΝ ΤΟΜΩΝ ΣΤΑΤΙΣΤΙΚΗ ΑΝΑΛΥΣΗ CONTENTS RULES AND REGULATIONS LIST OF COUNTRY CODES INDEX BROODMARES WITH THEIR PRODUCE LIST OF STALLIONS LIST OF IMPORTED HORSES LIST OF EXPORTED HORSES NAMES ADDENDA TO PREVIOUS VOLUME ERRATA AND ADDENDA TO PREVIOUS VOLUME BREEDING STATISTICS ΚΑΝΟΝΙΣΜΟΙ ΠΡΟΫΠΟΘΕΣΕΙΣ ΓΙΑ ΤΗΝ ΕΓΓΡΑΦΗ ΕΝΟΣ ΙΠΠΟΥ ΣΤΟ ΚΥΠΡΙΑΚΟ STUD BOOK Καθαρόαιμος ίππος είναι αυτός που έχει καταχωρηθεί σε ένα Βιβλίο Γενεαλογίας Καθαρόαιμων Ίππων εγκεκριμένο από τη Διεθνή Επιτροπή Stud Book, κατά το χρόνο της επίσημης καταχώρησης του. 1. ΓΕΝΕΑΛΟΓΙΑ/ΚΑΤΑΛΛΗΛΟΤΗΤΑ A. Για να είναι ένας ίππος κατάλληλος για να εγγραφεί στο Κυπριακό Stud Book πρέπει να πληροί τις προϋποθέσεις που περιγράφονται πιο κάτω: 1. Ο ίππος αυτός θα πρέπει να είναι το προϊόν μιας διασταύρωσης ενός επιβήτορα (πατέρας) και μιας τοκάδας (μητέρα), οι οποίοι είναι και οι δυο καταχωρημένοι σε ένα Βιβλίο Γενεαλογίας Καθαρόαιμων Ίππων εγκεκριμένο από τη Διεθνή Επιτροπή Stud Book. ή 2. Να αποδεικνύεται ότι ο ίππος είναι προϊόν οκτώ καταχωρημένων διαδοχικών διασταυρώσεων (συμπεριλαμβανομένης και της διασταυρώσεως των γονέων του) με ίππους που ανήκουν στην κατηγορία 1 πιο πάνω και να εκπληρώνει τους εγκεκριμένους όρους για πώλους Β 2 και 3 όπως πιο κάτω. Για σκοπούς του Κυπριακού Stud Book ίπποι που ανήκουν στις κατηγορίες 1 και 2 πιο πάνω ορίζονται ως «καθαρόαιμοι». Β. Επιπρόσθετα, ένας πώλος μπορεί να προαχθεί από ένα Μητρώο Μη Καθαρόαιμων Ίππων και να εγγραφεί στο Κυπριακό Stud Book όταν πληροί τις ακόλουθες προϋποθέσεις: 1.
[Show full text]