1353 States Reorganisation [RAJYASABHA] Bill, 1956 1354

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1353 States Reorganisation [RAJYASABHA] Bill, 1956 1354 1353 States Reorganisation [RAJYASABHA] Bill, 1956 1354 such an utterance; and, secondly, whether it SHRI P. N. SAPRU (Uttar Pradesh): was right on his part to indicate that nothing I would say that from a constitutional would be changed when one of the Houses point of view the Prime Minister was had yet to discuss the matter and bring to bear perfectly right in saying what he actual its wise judgment upon it. This is the submis- ly said. The responsibility of the sion I would like to make. Government is primarily to the Lok (Interruptions.) Sabha and it is the Lok Sabha ................. (Interruptions.) SHRI H. P. SAKSENA (Uttar Pra desh): Most of the Members of the SHRI BHUPESH GUPTA: There I join House do not in any way feel that the issue with the hon. Member. It is not a speech of the Prime Minister................ question of to whom the Government is responsible. We are dealing with the question SHRI K. S. HEGDE (Madras): What was of how a thing becomes law. An eminent said was that Lok Sabha's decision was final lawyer like my hon. friend should not mix up subject to Rajya Sabha's concurrence. the two issues. Sir, you are the guardian of the rights and privileges of the House and I (Interruptions.) request you to take up this matter with the SHRI S. N. MAZUMDAR (West Bengal): authorities concerned so that in future we do The question is this. The Government not have a repetition of such things. probably may think that because of its majority this decision is final but here the SHRI P. N. SAPRU: We are prepared question raised is a question of privilege of to dicsuss this fully and ........... this • House. MR. CHAIRMAN: Order, order. MR. CHAIRMAN: When a Bill comes to the Rajya Sabha from the Lok Sabha, it should not be taken that the Bill is going to be returned to the Lok Sabha in the form in THE STATES REORGANISATION which it came. This House has got the full BILL, 1956 liberty to consider, deliberate upon, modify, amend or return it as it is. That is a privilege THE MINISTER IN THE MINISTRY OF which this House has, and when the Prime HOME AFFAIRS (SHRI B. N. DATAR) : Sir, I Minister said about Parliament, there is no beg to move: doubt that he meant the two Houses. Under the Constitution Parliament means both the "That the Bill to provide for the Houses, Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha. Without reorganisation of the States of India and for the concurrence of this House, no Bill can matters connected therewith, as passed by become law. An Act of Parliament means the Lok Sabha, be taken into something which is agreed to by both the consideration." Houses and assented to by the President. Sir, the question of the reorganisation of SHRI JASPAT ROY KAPOOR (Uttar the States has been before the country since Pradesh): Sir, I would like to point out December 1953 when a Commission was that the report that has been read out appointed for the purpose of considering all from some paper—I do not know what the circumstances bearing on the question of it is....... reorganisation and for submitting a report. SHRI BHUPESH GUPTA: It is Statesman. Thereupon this Commission submitted their Report in October 1955 and since then this SHRI JASPAT ROY KAPOOR: Whatever House and the other House considered the it is, the report is not a full and complete recommendations of the Commission in all report. What the Prime Minister said was— their aspects in December or thereabout. The we were present there—that the Bill had to recommendations were also considered at an come up before the Rajya Sabha. He said so earlier stage by the various States Legis- definitely and categorically and that part of latures. There was also public opinion his speech has not been reported on and hence reflected through the representation of various it is not a correct version. bodies and persons as also of the public in general. On the strength of all these materials, that had been received, the Government of India took certain decisions and announced them 1355 Slates Reorganisation [16 AUG. 1956] Bill, 1956 1356 on the 16th January 1956. Thereafter, Sir, the i minently before the public was regarding the question arose of drafting a Bill for the future of Bombay. On that question also the purpose of sending the Bill to the State Government had taken a certain decision and Legislatures for their opinion as laid down in in the Joint Select Committee also naturally article 3 of the Constitution. In the meanwhile, the form remained in which the Government's as the House is aware, there was a proposal decision had been formerly embodied. But, mooted out by the Chief Ministers of West thanks to the efforts, thanks to the earnestness Bengal and Bihar for the purpose of having an that was exhibited by a number of hon. administrative union of the territories under Members of both the Houses of Parliament, it these two States, and this matter was now became possible for the Lok Sabha to considered for a number of months, and that consider a bilingual formula so far as the was the reason why, when a Bill had to be formerly proposed States of Maharashtra and prepared in accordance with the Government's Gujarat and the proposed territory of Bombay decisions on the recommendations of the S. R. were concerned; and this proposal, Sir, though C, no provision was first made regarding West it came suddenly, was one that could be Bengal and Bihar. For that another Bill was welcomed beoause a very important problem, subsequently introduced in Parliament. That a very complicated problem, namely the Bill was submitted to the Joint Select tangle over the Bombay question, had been in Committee and their Report has now been a way solved in as satisfactory a manner as placed on the Tables of both the' Houses, and possible. The honourable House is already the West Bengal and Bihar (Transfer of aware that the Members of the States Reor- Territories) Bill will be taken up in the other ganisation Commission also were anxious that House just today. So far as these two states are so far as Bombay was concerned, Bombay's concerned, they could not, therefore, be the importance in the Indian Union should be kept subject matter of the States Reorganisation up and enhanced to the extent that was neces- Bill. Therefore, in respect of practically all the sary by having a bilingual State. Now, the recommendations made by the States bilingual State that has emerged is larger than Reorganisation Commission the Government the bilingual State that was conceived of and prepared a Bill and, as I stated, sent it out to recommended by the S. R. C. Now, you would the various State Governments with a desire find, Sir, that so far as the new Bombay State that the State Legislatures should be is concerned, it consists of the whole of the consulted. Their opinions were received, and Maharashtra area proposed to be transferred thereafter Government with slight modifica- under the first Bill to the Maharashtra State, tions introduced the Bill in the other House, the whole of the Gujarat area—and the and there was a reference of the Bill to the Gujarat area, as you are aware, consists of the Joint Select Committee. Similarly, that matter State of Gujarat, the Part C State of Kutch and was also heard here, and this House was also also the Part C State of Saurashtra. So far as pleased to select the names of persons who Maharashtra is concerned, the Marathi- were to be on the Joint Select Committee so speaking districts in the Bombay State, the far as the Rajya Sabha was concerned. This Marathwada district from the Hyderabad State Joint Select Committee went into the whole and the Marathi-speaking districts of the matter and a number of amendments were present Madhya I Pradesh State have all been introduced by them, and the Joint Select put to-! gether. We have all the Marathi- Committee's Report was placed on the Tables speaking areas in India and all the Gujerati- of both the Houses. speaking areas in India coupled together and put under a common administration in which Thereafter about a fortnight ago the Bill, as naturally Bombay City and Greater Bombay recommended by the Joint Select Committee, have been included, and thus we have the was taken into consideration in the other happy spectacle of our dream regarding the House, and the stupendous nature of the future of Bombay being realised. The discussions that went on there would be clear ambition that we had of having a larger to this House in that there were as many as bilingual State has been now fulfilled. Thanks 607 amendments tabled to the Bill as it again to the great efforts that the hon. emerged from the Joint Select Committee. Members of Parliament in this House and in Naturally, Sir, as you are aware, the question the other that was most pro- 1357 States Reorganisation [ RAJYA SA1JHA] Bill, 1956 1358 [Shri B. N. Datar.] am quite confident, would be in the direction made, you will find, Sir, that so far as this of supporting the provisions of the present question is concerned it has received the Bill. largest measure of support so far as the other House is concerned. When this particular SHRI BHUPESH GUPTA (West Bengal): formula regarding the new bilingual State of Will the hon.
Recommended publications
  • Bombay Act No. Lxxviii of 1958
    GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT LEGISLATIVE PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT BOMBAY ACT NO. LXXVIII OF 1958 THE JUDICIAL OFFICER PROTECTION(EXTENSION TO HYDERABAD AND SAURASHTRA AREA OF BOMBAY STATE) ACT,1958. (As modified upto the 31st October, 2006) THE JUDICIAL OFFICERS’ PROTECTION (EXTENSION TO HYDERABAD AND SAURASHTRA AREAS OF BOMBAY STATE) ACT, 1958. .................................... CONTENTS PREAMBLE PAGE NO. SECTIONS. 1. Short title. 2. Extension of Act XVIII of 1850 to Hyderabad and Saurashtra areas of Bombay State. 3. Repeal and Saving. BOMBAY ACT NO. LXXVIII OF 19581 [THE JUDICIAL OFFICERS PROTECTIONS (EXTENSIONS TO HYDERABAD AND SAURASHTRA AREAS OF BOMBAY STATE) ACT, 1958.] [7th October , 1958] An Act to extend the Judicial Officers’ Protection Act, 1850, to the Hyderabad and Saurashtra areas of the State of Bombay. XVIII of WHEREAS the Judicial Officers’ Protection Act, 1850, is in force in the whole of 1850. the State of Bombay except the territories which immediately before the 1st November 1956 were comprised in Part B States : AND WHEREAS in the Hyderabad area of the State the Protection of Nazims and Hyd. IV of Servants Act is in force and in the Saurashtra area the Judicial Officers’ Protection Act, 1314. Fasli XVIII of 1850 as adapted and applied by the State of Saurashtra (Application of Central and 1850. Bombay Acts) Ordinance, 1948 is in force ; Sau. Ord. XXV of 1948. AND WHEREAS it is expedient that the Judicial Officers’ Protection Act, 1850 as in force in the rest of the State of Bombay be extended to and brought into force also in the Hyderabad and Saurashtra areas thereof ; and in consequence the corresponding laws aforesaid be repealed ; It is hereby enacted in the Ninth Year of the Republic of India as follows :- 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary Executive Summary
    M/s Madhya Bharat Agro Products Limited – Unit III Executive Summary Saurai Industrial Area ,Village Saurai, Tahsil Banda, Dist. Sagar (M.P.) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.0 Introduction M/s Madhya Bharat Agro Products Limited-Unit is the registered Public limited company having its head Office at Bhilwara (Rajasthan). The company is engaged in various industrial activities in Rajasthan and M.P. The Sagar/Chharatpur region is having very rich source of Rock Phosphate. Therefore company is going to setup a Rock Phosphate Beneficiation Plant at Saurai Industrial Area, village – Saurai, Tehsil Banda, District Sagar (M.P.). The proposed capacity of the plant is 300 TPD. The total land of 23370 sqm is already acquired by the company for the proposed plant. Very low grade rock phosphate converted into high grade rock phosphate by processing. It is a well known fact that India has very low reserves of high grade rock- phosphate (+30%P 2O5).though rock-phosphate reserves have been located in some States like Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, West Bengal, Andhra Pradesh, and Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan State Mines & Minerals ltd. is a main source of supply of indigenous rock phosphate, Approx over one million tonne per year of high grade rock phosphate is being manufactured. Madhay Pradesh has estimated ore reserves of 45.6 million Tones (MT) of Low Grade rock-phosphate which makes it the second largest state in India in terms of rock phosphate, Jhabua Mines account for 26.8 Million tones and 18.7 Million Tone at Hirapur. Out of these deposit, only 4.2 MT of Jhabua Rock and 2.1 MT of Hirapur, are of high grade (grater than 30% P 2O5).
    [Show full text]
  • Congress (Hyderabad); S
    D DAGA, SHRI NARAYANDAS K. : Congress (Hyderabad); s. of Shri Kedarnath Daga; b. October 24, 1923; m. Shrimati Chand Devi N. Daga, 4 s. and 2 d.; Member, Rajya Sabha, 23-4-1954 to 2-4-1958; Died. Obit. on 18-11-1968. DAGA, SHRI SITARAM : Inter; Congress (West Bengal); s. of Shri Duli Chand Daga; b. April 4, 1923; m. Shrimati Savitri Devi Daga, 1 d.; Member, Rajya Sabha, 3-5-1957 to 2-4-1958. Per. Add. : 25/1, Ballygunj, Circular Road, Calcutta (West Bengal). DALMIA, SHRI SANJAY : B .A . (Hon.) Economics ; S .P. (Uttar Pradesh); s. of Shri Vishnu Hari Dalmia; b. March 17, 1944; m. Shrimati Indu Dalmia; Member, Rajya Sabha, 3-2-1994 to 4-7-1998. Per. Add. :(i) House No. B-118, Sector 26, Noida, District-Ghaziabad (U.P.) and (ii) Dalmia (Bros.) Pvt. Ltd., IInd Floor, Indraprakash Building, 21, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi -110001. DALWAI, SHRI HUSSAIN : B.A. , LL.B. ; Congress (I ) (Maharashtra); s. of Shri Misarikhan Bawakhan Dalwai; b. August 17, 1922; m. Shrimati Fatima Hussain Dalwai, 3 s. and 2 d.; Member, Maharashtra Legislative Assembly, 1962-78; Minister, Government of Maharashtra, 1977-78; Member, Rajya Sabha, 3-4- 1984 to 28-12-1984. Per. Add. : Village Uktad, Post Office Chiplun, District Ratnagiri (Maharashtra). DAMODARAN, SHRI K. : C.P.I. (Kerala); s. of Shri K.T. Namboodiripad; b. March 1, 1912; m. Shrimati K P. Padman; Member, Rajya Sabha, 3-4-1964 to 2-4- 1970; Secretary, Kerala P.C.C., 1940; Author of a number of books in Malayalam; Died.
    [Show full text]
  • States Reorganization and Accommodation of Ethno-Territorial Cleavages in India Occasional Paper Number 29
    Occasional Paper Series Number 29 States Reorganization and Accommodation of Ethno-Territorial Cleavages in India Harihar Bhattacharyya States Reorganization and Accommodation of Ethno-Territorial Cleavages in India Harihar Bhattacharyya © Forum of Federations, 2019 ISSN: 1922-558X (online ISSN 1922-5598) Occasional Paper Series Number 29 States Reorganization and Accommodation of Ethno-Territorial Cleavages in India By Harihar Bhattacharyya For more information about the Forum of Federations and its publications, please visit our website: www.forumfed.org. Forum of Federations 75 Albert Street, Suite 411 Ottawa, Ontario (Canada) K1P 5E7 Tel: (613) 244-3360 Fax: (613) 244-3372 [email protected] 3 States Reorganization and Accommodation of Ethno-Territorial Cleavages in India Overview What holds India, a vast multi-ethnic country, together in the midst of so many odds? The question is particularly significant because India’s unity and integrity has been possible despite democracy. The key to the above success lies in a mode of federation building that sought to continuously ‘right-size’ the territory of India. The method followed in doing so is called ‘states reorganization’ in India as a result of which ethno-territorial cleavages have been accommodated and regulated. The result has been durable ethnic peace and political stability. At independence (15 August 1947), India inherited nine provinces and over 560 princely states from the old colonial arrangements. An interim state structure was put in place, but it was recognized that a fundamental restructuring would be required in due course. The process was complex and painstaking but managed to create sub-national units called ‘states’, mostly on the basis of language; subsequently non-linguistic ethnic factors were also taken into consideration.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Polity *
    QUICK REVISION MODULES VALUE ADDED NOTES CURRENT AFFAIRS *INDIAN POLITY * Need some help? [email protected] Or use live chat from home page Www.IASTODAY.in ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Domestic Violence Act Why its important? ✔ Supreme Court widens ambit of Domestic Violence Act orders striking down of the two words ‘adult male’, paving the way for prosecution of women and non-adults for violence against a woman. What next to study? ➢ The Supreme Court has widened the scope of the Domestic Violence Act by ordering deletion of the words “adult male” from it, paving the way for prosecution of women and even non- adults for subjecting a woman relative to violence and harassment. ➢ The apex court has ordered striking down of the two words from Section 2(q) of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, which deals with respondents who can be sued and prosecuted under the Act for harassing a married woman in her matrimonial home. Design bureau to reduce dependence on imports Why its important? ✔ To indigenise procurements and reduce import dependence, the Indian Army announced the establishment of the Army Design Bureau which will integrate various stake holders in its long-term requirements. What next to study? ➢ The design bureau will be the repository of all technical know-how for defence equipment manufacturing. ➢ The Army Design Bureau (ADB) has been conceptualised as an interface of the Indian Army with the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), academia, defence PSUs, OFBs and private industry, paving the way for high-quality research and development of defence products.
    [Show full text]
  • History and Evaluation of State Reorganization Commissions in India
    Review Article Volume 12:4, 2021 Arts and Social Sciences Journal ISSN: 2151-6200 Open Access History and Evaluation of State Reorganization Commissions in India Gopi Madaboyina* Department of Political Science and Public Administration, Adikavi Nannaya University, Andhra Pradesh, India Abstract Today, India is a Union of 29 States and 7 Union Territories. The geography of the Indian Federal Polity, however, has been the product of a long period of development and even after it came into existence, it has been continuously changing. Nor can one say with degree of certainty that the boundaries have at last been drawn with finality. The aim of this paper is to describe about the history and evaluation of state reorganization commissions in India and explain the growth importance of state administration. Keywords: Evaluation • Reorganization commissions • JVP committee • SRC report Commissioner’s provinces i.e. Delhi, Ajmer-Merwara, Panth Piploda, Introduction Coorg and Andaman-Nicobar islands. In the British period, the “States” were known as Provinces and it was the provinces which first came into existence before form any State Setup at the Commencement central Government did. The first central government could make its appearance only in the year 1773. Before this there were three of the Constitution provinces known as “Presidencies” namely, the presidency of Fort After partition, India faced the problems of consolidation, the William in Bengal, the presidency of fort St. George in Madras and integration of the princely states and the framing of a constitution the presidency of Bombay. The presidency of fort William was the (approximately two-fifth of the area under the Raj had been made up largest and the Charter Act of 1883 provided for its division into i) the these 562 principalities, varying in size from a few square miles to an presidency of fort William in the lower province in Bengal and ii) the area as large as Hyderabad, with Seventeen million people).
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Polity and Governance English.Indd
    ANSWERS AND EXPLANATIONS Indian Polity and Governance 1. (c) in noti fi ed minority concentrati on districts by members of minority communiti es as well as The Rights against exploitati on is provided under others. Arti cles 23 and 24 of the Consti tuti on of India. Arti cle 23 of the Indian Consti tuti on reads as follows: Improving living conditi ons: The Committ ee noted that the poverty rati o is highest for Muslims in urban “Traffi c in human beings and beggar and similar areas at 34%. Additi onally, the rati o of workers in the other forms of forced labour are prohibited and any total populati on (worker populati on rati o) is much contraventi on of this provision shall be an off ence higher for males than for females in all religious punishable in accordance with law.” groups, especially in urban areas. Arti cle 24 forbids employment of child-labor in • Preventi ng and controlling communal riots: The factories or in hazardous works. The arti cle reads Committ ee noted that 668 incidents of communal ”No child below the age of fourteen years, shall be violence were reported in the country in 2012 in employed to work in any factory or mine or, engaged which 703 persons were killed and 1,506 persons in any other hazardous employment.” were injured. 2. (c) 3. (b) Statement 1 is correct. According to Arti cle 30 of The Consolidated Fund of India formed under the consti tuti on, all minoriti es, whether based on religion provision of Arti cle 266(1) of the Indian Consti tuti on or language, shall have the right to establish and and No amount can be withdrawn from the fund administer educati onal insti tuti ons of their choice.
    [Show full text]
  • Charecterization of Diffuse Chemical Pollution in Satna District of Vindhya Region, India
    International Research Journal of Environment Sciences________________________________ ISSN 2319–1414 Vol. 2(11), 46-60, November (2013) Int. Res. J. Environment Sci. Charecterization of Diffuse Chemical Pollution in Satna District of Vindhya Region, India Tripathi Indra Prasad 1, Kumar M. Suresh 2 and Dwivedi Arvind Prasad 1 1 Deptt of Physical Sciences, Faculty of Science and Environment, M.G.C.G.V. Chitrakoot Satna, MP, INDIA 2 Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Division, National Environmental Engineering Research Institute, Nagpur, MS, INDIA Available online at: www.isca.in, www.isca.me Received 6th September 2013, revised 29 th October 2013, accepted 20 th November 2013 Abstract Concern over agricultural diffuse pollution sources in integrated water and soil quality management has been growing recently 1. The term diffuse essentially point to this feature of the discharge of such pollution leads which makes them some what difficult to notice, monitor or control. For the study of seasonal variation in inorganic content as well as physico chemical parameters, monitoring was done during summer, rainy and winter season year 2009 to 2011. The parameters like temperature, pH, turbidity, dissolved oxygen (DO) biochemical oxygen demond (BOD), chemical oxygen demond (COD), nitrate, nitrite, chloride, sulphate, phosphate and heavy metals for water analysis and soil temperature, pH, O.C (organic carbon), total nitrogen, phosphorus, exchangeable cation (Na +, K +, Ca ++ , Mg ++ ) and heavy metals for soil analysis have been studied. The study revealed that the water sources in the area are heavily polluted. The heavy metals concentration were found more than the permissible limits during all the seasons. Most of these parameters are correlated with one another.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resource Department District Chhatarpur
    DISTRICT SURVEY REPORT CHHATARPUR MADHYA PRADESH MINERAL RESOURCE DEPARTMENT DISTRICT CHHATARPUR IN COMPLIANCE OF MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT, FOREST AND CLIMATE CHANGE, NOTIFICATION DATED15.01.2016 CONTENTS Pages 1. Introduction 3-4 2. Overview of Mining Activity in the District 5-7 3. The List of Mining Leases in the District with location, 8-11 area and period of validity 4. General Profile of the District 12-15 5. Land Utilization Pattern in the district: Forest, Agriculture, 16 Horticulture, Mining 6. Physiographic of the District 17 7. Geology and Mineral Wealth 18-29 8. Conclusion 20 09. References 21 1. INTRODUCTION Chhatarpur was founded in 1785 and is named after the Bundela Rajput leader Chhatrasal, the founder of Bundelkhand independence, and contains his cenotaph. The state was ruled by his descendants until 1785. At that time the Ponwar clan of the Rajputs took control of Chhatarpur. The state was guaranteed to Kunwar Sone Singh Ponwar in 1806 by the British Raj. In 1854 Chhatarpur would have lapsed to the British government for want of direct heirs under the doctrine of lapse, but was conferred on Jagat Raj as a special act of grace. The Ponwar Rajas ruled a princely state with an area of 1,118 square miles (2,900 km2), and population of 156,139 in 1901, which was part of the Bundelkhand agency of Central India. In 1901 the town of Chhatarpur had a population of 10,029, a high school and manufactured paper and coarse cutlery. The state also contained the British cantonment of Nowgong. After the independence of India in 1947, the Rajas of Chhatarpur acceded to India, and Chhatarpur, together with the rest of Bundelkhand, became part of the Indian state of Vindhya Pradesh.
    [Show full text]
  • The Indian Journal of Agricu Tural Economics
    THE INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICU TURAL ECONOMICS (Organ of the Indian Society of Agricultural Economics) Vol. VII. MARCH 1952 No. CONFERENCE NUMBER )e/PROCEE DINGS of the TWELFTH CONFERENCE held at Gwalior, November 1951 _‘ SUBJECTS 1. Problems in Calculating Cost of Cultivation. 2. Objects and Methods of Crop Planning. 3. India's Foreign Trade in Agricultural Commodities. Rs. 6-8 CONTENTS. PAGE Welcome Address—Sum K. B. LALL, I.C.S. — •. • • .• • • 1 Inaugural Address—Hon'ble SHRI TAKHTMAL JAIN .. • • • • • • 4 Presidential Address—SHRI R. K. PATIL • • • • • • •. • • 7 Problems of Calculating the cost of Cultivation (1) T. G. SHIRNAME • • • • • • • • • • •. .• • • 23 (2) V. G. PANSE .. •. • • • • • • • • • • .• • • 36 (3) J. K. PANDE .. • • .• • • • • .• • • • • • • 41 (4) P. N. DRIVER. • • .• • • • • • • •. 55 (5) K. M. SHAH .. •. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 63 (6) G. D. AGRAWAL •. •. .• • • • • • • • • • • 73 (7) ARJAN SINGH .. •. • • • • • • .• •. •. 79 (8) Y. SANKARASITBRAMANIAM •. .• • • • • .• • • • • 87 (9) S. G. MADMAN • • • • •. •. • • • • • • • • 94 The Objects and Methods of Crop Planning (1) TARLOK SINGH • • • • •. • • • • • • 100 (2) R. L. SETHI .. • • •. •. •. • • • • •. • • 105 (3) K. G. SIVASAVAMY •. • • • • • • • • • • • • •. 112 (4) J. S. GULERI .. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 126 (5) M. B. DESAI .. • • •. • • • • •. • • • • 132 (6) M. SRINIVASAN • • • • • • .• • • .• • • • • 140 India's Foreign Trade in Agricultural Commodities (I) R. N. PAD VAL •. • • • • • • • • •. • • • • 142 (2) C. W. B. ZA CHARIAS • • • • • • •
    [Show full text]
  • 24TH MEETING of the WESTERN ZONAL COUNCIL HELD Panaji 22
    24TH MEETING OF THE WESTERN ZONAL COUNCIL HELD Panaji 22, 2019 Sravana 31, 1941 The 24th meeting of the Western Zonal Council was held at Panaji on August 22, 2019, under the Chairmanship of Union Home Minister Shri Amit Shah in the city today. The meeting was attended by the Chief Minister of Goa Dr. Pramod Sawant, Chief Minister of Maharashtra Shri. Devendra Fadnavis, Chief Minister of Gujarat Shri. V.R. Rupani and Administrator of the Union Territories of Daman & Diu and Dadra & Nagar Haveli Deputy Shri. Prafula Patel along with other Ministers from these States, senior officers from the Central and State Governments including Chief Secretaries and Secretaries to Government of India. The meeting began with Chief Minister of Maharashtra welcoming the decision taken by the Prime Minister and Union Home Minister regarding the removal of Article 370 and 35A of the Constitution in respect of the State of Jammu & Kashmir. He also emphasized that this decision would pave the way for the development of J&K and Ladakh and integration of this part with the rest of the country. The Chief Ministers of Goa & Gujarat and Administrator of Daman & Diu and Dadra & Nagar Haveli also endorsed and supported the views of CM, Maharashtra. Welcoming all the members of the Council to the 24th meeting, the Union Home Minister said that the meeting will be fruitful in resolving the issues having Centre-State and inter-State ramifications with consensus. After due deliberations, unequivocal decisions taken by consensus should be resolved to further strengthen the federal structure of the country, he said.
    [Show full text]
  • Prelim Bits 24-10-2019
    Prelim Bits 24-10-2019 Snow Leopard Population Assessment Union Environment Ministry launched the First National Protocol on Snow Leopard Population Assessment in India. It was launched in the Global Snow Leopard & Ecosystem Protection (GSLEP) Program on International Snow Leopard Day. It is the first of its kind, developed in association with the Snow Leopard States/UTs - Ladakh, Jammu & Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Sikkim and Arunachal Pradesh. Snow Leopard is found in 12 countries - India, Nepal, Bhutan, China, Mongolia, Russia, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. It is listed as a ‘vulnerable’ category in the Red List of IUCN. GSLEP It is the world’s first initiative that aims to conserve high mountain ecosystems by protecting snow leopard in the region. It unites all 12 range country governments, non-governmental and inter- governmental organisations, local communities, private sector. Arunachal Pradesh is one of the 22 priority landscapes of the GSLEP. In 2004, WWF-India introduced the concept of Community Conserved Area (CCA) in the State to empower local communities to become active decision- makers and implement conservation initiatives. This year, the GSLEP Program is being organised by the Union Environment Ministry at New Delhi. The Steering Committee meeting of GSLEP chaired by Nepal and Co-Chaired by Kyrgyzstan. Global Ease of Doing Business World Bank has released Ease of Doing Business ranking for the year 2019. India ranks at 63rd among 190 countries, moved 14 places from the previous year (77th rank in 2018). The report assess improvement in ease of doing business environment in Delhi and Mumbai. In the last 5 years, India’s ranking has improved 79 places - to 63 in 2019 from 142 in 2014.
    [Show full text]