DOCSLIB.ORG

Routing Diagram of Surface-Water Flow in the San Bernardino Area, California, 1998–PLATE 2 U.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Routing Diagram of Surface-Water Flow in the San Bernardino Area, California, 1998–PLATE 2 U.S OPEN-FILE REPORT 2005-1278 Pending release as USGS Professional Paper 1734 Routing Diagram of Surface-Water Flow in the San Bernardino area, California, 1998–PLATE 2 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR PREPARED IN COOPERATION WITH Danskin, W.R., McPherson, K.R., and Woolfenden, L.R., 2006, Hydrology, Description of Computer Models, U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT and Evaluation of Selected Water-Management Alternatives in the San Bernardino Area, California R 6 W R 5 W 117 25' R 5 W R 4 W 117 20' 117 15' R 3 W 117 10' R 3 W R 2 W 117 05' Surface-water flow paths [SAR, Santa Ana River; Cr, Creek] Segment Segment Segment Segment Segment Segment Segment Segment Surface-water flow path Surface-water flow path Surface-water flow path Surface-water flow path Surface-water flow path Surface-water flow path Surface-water flow path Surface-water flow path No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. 1 Lytle Creek channel 11 Sweetwater basin 26 unnamed 61 MacQuidy-Severence diversion channel 96 Waterman basin channel 131 Perris Hill basin 181 Oak Creek inflow 236 Mill Creek pipe, diversion 1 to Zanja 2 Lytle Creek turnout, gravel pit for recharge 12 Sweetwater and Devil Canyon, joined 27 Devil Canyon Road storm drain 62 Sycamore basin bypass 97 Waterman basin bypass 132 Del Rosa channel 182 Plunge Creek channel 237 Mill Creek pipe, Tate water-treatment plant 3 Lytle Creek channel 13 Devil Canyon diversion 28 Macy basin bypass 63 Sycamore basin 98 Waterman basin 133 Sand Canyon Dam inflow 183 Elder Creek inflow 238 Mill Creek pipe, diversion to Redlands system 4 Lytle Creek turnout, proposed recharge basin 14 Devil Canyon basin bypass 29 Macy basin 64 Sycamore basin channel 99 Waterman basin channel 134 Sand Canyon Dam bypass 184 Elder Creek basin bypass 239 Mill Creek pipe, return flow to Zanja 5 Lytle Creek channel 15 Devil Canyon basin 30 Macy storm drain 65 East Badger basin channel 100 Waterman Creek bypass channel 135 Sand Canyon Dam 185 Elder Creek basin 240 Greenspot inflow from Bear Valley 6 Cajon Creek channel 16 Devil Canyon Creek 31 Cal Trans percolation basin 66 East Badger basin bypass 101 East Twin Creek channel 136 Sand Creek channel 186 Elder Creek channel 241 Greenspot below Bear Valley 7 Cable Creek channel and recharge areas 17 Wiggins #1 basin bypass 32 Lytle Creek channel 67 East Badger basin 102 East Twin Creek channel 137 Patton turnout 187 Plunge Creek channel 242 Greenspot diversion to Mill Creek pipe 8 Devil Canyon Creek channel 18 Wiggins #1 basin 33 Muscott storm drain 68 East Badger basin channel 103 Harrison basin inflow 138 Sand Creek channel 188 City Creek channel 243 Greenspot inflow to Zanja 9 Sweetwater turnout 19 Wiggins #1, joined 34 Lytle Creek channel 69 South Badger basin bypass 104 Harrison basin bypass 139 Patton basin bypass 189 SAR inflow 244 Bear Valley pipe, below Greenspot diversion 10 Sweetwater basin bypass 20 Wiggins #1, overflow to Wiggins #2 35 Base Line storm drain, inflow 70 South Badger basin 105 Harrison basin 140 Patton basin 190 SAR wells 245 Bear Valley pipe, diversion to Mill Creek basin 36 Base Line basin bypass 71 Western Avenue channel 21 Devil Canyon diversion channel 106 Harrison basin channel 141 Warm Creek upper channel 191 SAR channel 246 Bear Valley pipe, inflow to Zanja 37 Base Line basin 72 Wiggins Dam #2 bypass 107 East Twin Creek channel 22 Devil Canyon diversion channel 142 Bald Ridge Creek 192 SAR pipe, pickup 1 to powerhouse 2 247 Zanja inflow from Mill Creek channel 38 Base Line basin channel 73 Wiggins Dam #2 basin 108 East Twin Creek basin bypass 143 Warm Creek upper channel 23 Cajon Creek channel 193 SAR pipe, diversion to Greenspot/Bear Valley 248 Zanja below Mill Creek pipe inflow 1 39 Lytle Creek channel 74 Devil Creek channel 109 East Twin Creek basin 144 Elm storm drain 24 Lytle Creek channel 194 SAR pipe, diversion to Greenspot pipeline 249 Zanja below Greenspot inflow 40 Lytle Creek basin bypass 75 Devil Creek channel 110 East Twin Creek channel 145 Warm Creek upper channel 25 Devil Canyon Road storm drain 195 SAR pipe, diversion to Bear Valley Highline 250 Zanja below Mill Creek pipe inflow 2 41 Lytle Creek basin 76 Little Mountain basin bypass 111 40th Street basin bypass 146 McGlothlen storm drain 196 SAR pipe, powerhouse 3 251 Zanja diversion to Bear Valley pipe 42 Lytle Creek channel 77 Little Mountain basin 112 40th Street basin 147 Warm Creek upper channel 197 SAR pipe, diversion to Redlands Aqueduct 252 Zanja below Bear Valley diversion 43 Lytle Creek, west channel 78 Little Mountain channel 113 East Twin Creek channel 148 Warm Creek upper channel 198 SAR pipe 253 Zanja below Bear Valley inflow 44 Lytle Creek, east branch 79 MacQuidy basin inflow 114 Lynwood basin inflow 149 Warm Creek channel 34 15' 199 SAR pipe, after pickup 2 254 Zanja diversion to Crafton Reservoir 11051501 45 H Street storm drain 80 MacQuidy basin bypass 115 Lynwood basin bypass 150 9th Street storm drain FIGURE A 200 SAR pipe, diversion to North Fork Canal 255 Zanja below diversion to Crafton Reservoir Santa Ana River near 46 Virginia Street lateral drain 81 MacQuidy basin 116 Lynwood basin 151 Warm Creek channel 201 SAR pipe 256 Zanja 3rd street storm drain Mentone, combined 47 H Street storm drain 82 Mayfield turnout 117 Lynwood basin channel 152 Warm Creek natural channel 202 SAR pipe, diversion to Edwards Canal 257 Zanja channel 189 discharge 48 Lytle Creek, east channel 83 Mayfield turnout channel 118 East Twin Creek channel 153 Warm Creek channel 203 SAR pipe 258 Citrus ditch, inflow 1 49 North Badger turnout 84 Electric Avenue storm drain 119 Gilbert Street storm drain 154 City Creek channel inflow 204 Santa Ana turnout 259 Citrus ditch, inflow 2 190 50 North Badger bypass 85 Mt. View storm drain 120 East Twin Creek channel 155 City Creek turnout 191 205 Santa Ana basin channel 260 Citrus ditch 212 51 North Badger basin 86 29th Street basin bypass 121 Daly basin inflow 156 City Creek channel 206 Santa Ana upper basin bypass 261 Citrus ditch, inflow 3 52 North Badger channel 87 29th Street basin 122 Daly basin bypass 157 Bledsoe Creek 192 11063510 207 Santa Ana upper basin 262 Citrus ditch Cajon Creek below 53 West Badger channel 88 29th Street basin channel 123 Daly basin 158 City Creek channel 208 Santa Ana basin channel 263 Zanja below Citrus ditch Lone Pine Creek, 54 West Badger bypass 89 Brush Canyon basin inflow 124 Del Rosa channel 159 City Creek basin bypass 193 194 241 242 near Keenbrook 209 Santa Ana lower basin bypass 264 Zanja bypass channel 55 West Badger basin 90 Brush Canyon basin bypass 125 Little Sand Canyon channel inflow 160 City Creek basin 210 Santa Ana lower basin 265 Zanja natural channel 240 56 West Badger drain to Devil Canyon 91 Brush Canyon basin 126 Lemon basin bypass 161 City Creek channel 196 246 211 SAR return channel 266 Zanja Santa Ana 57 North Badger channel 92 Brush Canyon basin channel 127 Lemon basin 162 City Creek old channel 212 SAR channel 267 Redlands ditch No. 3, north side Turnout Redlands 195 244 58 North Badger basin bypass 93 Waterman Creek channel 128 Little Sand Canyon channel 163 Small Canyon channel 198 213 SAR, pickup 2 to SAR pipe 268 5th Avenue storm drain 213 197 Aqueduct 59 North Badger basin 94 Waterman Creek channel to basin 129 Del Rosa channel 164 City Creek old channel 214 SAR channel 269 Redlands ditch No. 3, south side 60 North Badger channel 95 Waterman turnout 130 Perris Hill basin bypass 165 Warm Creek channel 199 215 SAR, inflow from Mill Creek basin 270 Redlands ditch No. 3, combined North Fork Canal 166 Timber Creek 201 200 216 SAR channel 271 Zanja below Redlands ditch 167 Warm Creek channel 11063580 217 SAR channel 272 Reservoir Canyon storm drain 204 Edwards Canal Devil Canyon 168 Warm Creek channel Mountains Cable Creek 218 SAR below Plunge 273 Zanja below Reservoir Canyon drain 203 202 Creek near 169 Warm Creek channel San Bernardino 219 Mill Creek inflow 274 Garden storm drain 205 North 170 Warm Creek bypass channel 220 Mill Creek channel 275 Zanja below Garden storm drain Badger 171 Warm Creek bypass channel RIVER T2N T2N Sweetwater Turnout 221 Mill Creek channel above Zanja diversion 276 Redlands ditch No. 2 Turnout 172 Lytle Creek east channel Cajon Creek 222 Mill Creek channel 277 Redlands ditch No. 1 T1N 8 49 173 Lytle Creek east channel T1N 9 50 223 Mill Creek channel below return 1 214 Gabriel 174 Lytle Creek combined channels 278 Redlands ditch No. 2 10 224 Mill Creek channel below return 2 52 51 175 Warm Creek basin inflow 279 Morrey Arroyo inflow 11062001 12 225 Mill Creek basin bypass 280 Morrey Arroyo below Redlands ditch Lytle Creek 176 Warm Creek basin bypass 226 Mill Creek basin channel SANTA ANA near Fontana, 13 11 57 177 Warm Creek basin 281 Zanja below Morrey Arroyo combined discharge 7 227 Mill Creek basin San 53 59 62 61 178 Warm Creek basin outflow 282 SAR below Zanja 228 Mill Creek pipe, pickup 1 283 San Timoteo Creek inflow 11058600 179 City Creek channel 215 246 14 243 242 54 58 63 229 Mill Creek pipe, wells 284 Brown ditch 64 Waterman Canyon Creek 180 Plunge Creek inflow 6 15 55 60 near Arrowhead Springs 230 Mill Creek pipe, powerhouse 321 285 San Timoteo Creek below Brown ditch Mill Creek 245 56 65 231 Mill Creek pipe below Greenspot 286 Sargent drain Brush 232 Mill Creek pipe, return 1 to channel 287 San Timoteo Creek below Sargent drain 16 67 66 Canyon 93 233 Mill Creek pipe, above pickup 2 288 Bryn Mawr drain 17 18 89 11058500 234 Mill Creek channel, pickup 2 289 San Timoteo Creek below Bryn Mawr drain 235 Mill Creek pipe, below pickup 2 68 Mayfield East Twin Creek near
Load more

Recommended publications
  • County of Riverside General Plan Reche Canyon/Badlands Area Plan
    County of Riverside General Plan Reche Canyon/Badlands Area Plan COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Transportation and Land Management Agency 4080 Lemon Street, 12th Floor Riverside, CA 92501-3634 Phone: (951) 955-3200, Fax: (951) 955-1811 October 2011 County of Riverside General Plan Reche Canyon/Badlands Area Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Vision Summary.......................................................................................................................................................... iv Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................. 1 A Special Note on Implementing the Vision ........................................................................................................ 2 Location ........................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Features ........................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Setting ....................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Unique Features ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 Badlands/Norton Younglove Preserve
    [Show full text]
  • San Timoteo Creek Habitat Enhancement Project San Bernardino County, California
    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT San Timoteo Creek Habitat Enhancement Project San Bernardino County, California Project Location and Description The Cities of Loma Linda and Redlands have requested $4,500,240.00 from the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to preserve and enhance wildlife habitat along a portion of San Timoteo Creek. The project covers approximately 6.58 linear miles of San Timoteo Creek, from the confluence of the Santa Ana River to the Riverside County line. The funds will be used for property acquisition and development and implementation of an enhancement plan. The EPA is considering fulfilling this funding request. Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action The purpose of the proposed action is to preserve existing habitat as open space in a land conservancy and to enhance more urbanized areas primarily by establishing native vegetation characteristic of the San Timoteo Creek area. Urbanization and stream channelization for flood control in the City of Loma Linda have resulted in the substantial loss of wildlife habitat in the lower reach of San Timoteo Creek. These activities are needed because San Timoteo Creek provides one of the only remaining linkages that present the opportunity to enhance wildlife corridors between the Santa Ana River and Prado Basins on the west and the San Bernardino, San Gorgonio, and San Jacinto Mountains to the east. This project will also compliment other ongoing conservation efforts upstream on the San Timoteo Creek. Environmental Consequences An Environmental Assessment (EA) was prepared for the San Timoteo Creek Habitat Enhancement Project in conformance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGIC MAP and DIGITAL DATABASE of the REDLANDS 7.5’ QUADRANGLE, SAN BERNARDINO and RIVERSIDE COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA, V
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Open-File Report 03-302 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Description of Map Units, Redlands 7.5’ Quadrangle U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OPEN-FILE REPORT 03-302 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGIC MAP AND DIGITAL DATABASE OF THE REDLANDS 7.5’ QUADRANGLE, SAN BERNARDINO AND RIVERSIDE COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA, v. 1.0 Description of Map Units Geology by J.C. Matti1, D.M. Morton2, B.F. Cox3, and K.J. Kendrick3 Digital preparation by P.M. Cossette4, B. Jones1, and S.A. Kennedy1 Description of Map Units by J.C. Matti1 2003 This database and report are preliminary and have not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government 1U.S. Geological Survey, Tucson, Arizona 2U.S. Geological Survey, Riverside, California 3U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California 4U.S. Geological Survey, Spokane, Washington 1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Open-File Report 03-302 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Description of Map Units, Redlands 7.5’ Quadrangle [This Description of Map Units accompanies the geologic map and digital database of the Redlands 7.5’ quadrangle, San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, California, version 1.0] TABLE OF CONTENTS SURFICIAL DEPOSITS VERY YOUNG SURFICIAL DEPOSITS Very young wash deposits, active (latest Holocene) Very young wash deposits, unit 2 (latest Holocene) Very young wash deposits, unit 1 (latest Holocene) Very
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources
    The Groves at Loma Linda Specific Plan and Phase Three Concept Area Project Draft EIR - SCH # 2018021064 4.4 – CULTURAL RESOURCES 4.4.1 INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY The information in this Chapter is based on a Phase 1 Cultural Resources Investigation, prepared by McKenna et al., dated January 8, 2018, which reviewed the Specific Plan site conditions and the potential for impacts to cultural resources (see Appendix E of this Draft EIR). Cultural resources are defined as buildings, sites, structures, or objects, each of which may have historical, architectural, archaeological, cultural, or scientific importance. The term cultural resources also encompasses the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) term “historic property” as well as CEQA terms “historic resource” and “unique archaeological resource.” Under the NHPA, historic property refers to a property that is listed on, or determined eligible for listing on, the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Under CEQA, historic resource means a property that is listed on, or determined eligible for listing on the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR). Unique archaeological resources are archaeological artifacts, objects, or sites that contain information to answer important scientific questions, possess a particular quality such as the oldest of its type, or are directly associated with a recognized important prehistoric or historic event or person. Archaeological Records Search McKenna et al. completed a standard archaeological records search through the California State University, Fullerton, South Central Coastal Information Center in Redlands. This research included a review of previously completed projects within one mile of the Specific Plan site; a review of the recorded cultural resources within one mile of the Study Area; a review of listings for the NRHP, CRHR, California Landmarks and California Points of Historical Interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Carnivore Survey Report 2009
    Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Biological Monitoring Program Carnivore Survey Report 2009 23 April 2010 Carnivore Survey Report 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................................1 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ...................................................................................................................2 METHODS ....................................................................................................................................................3 TRANSECT SURVEYS..........................................................................................................................3 SURVEY DESIGN ..................................................................................................................6 FIELD PROCEDURE...............................................................................................................6 DATA ANALYSIS..................................................................................................................7 CAMERA STATIONS............................................................................................................................8 HABITAT LINKAGE SURVEYS...........................................................................................................11 INCIDENTAL OBSERVATIONS ...........................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • One Water One Watershed Plan Update 2018 Moving Forward Together Santa Ana River Watershed
    One Water One Watershed Plan Update 2018 Moving forward together Santa Ana River Watershed OWOW PLAN UPDATE 201 8 : MOVING FORWARD TOG ETHER SAWPA COMMISSION APPROVAL CERTIFICATION SAWPA NOVEMBER 2018 OWOW PLAN UPDATE 201 8 : MOVING FORWARD TOG ETHER INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK SAWPA NOVEMBER 2018 OWOW PLAN UPDATE 201 8 : MOVING FORWARD TOG ETHER OWOW STEERING COMMITTEE APPROVAL CERTIFICATION SAWPA NOVEMBER 2018 OWOW PLAN UPDATE 201 8 : MOVING FORWARD TOG ETHER INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK SAWPA NOVEMBER 2018 OWOW PLAN UPDATE 201 8 : MOVING FORWARD TOG ETHER TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS................................................................. ACR-1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................... ES-1 1. INTRODUCTION TO ONE WATER, ONE WATERSHED .................................... 1 1.1. Overview ................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2. History of Santa Ana River Watershed Planning...................................................................... 3 1.2.1. OWOW Plan: Moving Toward Sustainability.............................................................. 4 1.2.2. OWOW 2.0 Plan: Moving into Implementation ........................................................ 6 1.2.3. OWOW Plan Update 2018: MOVING FORWARD TOGETHER .............................. 9 1.3. Integrated Local Water Planning ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Application of a Two-Dimensional Model of Hydrodynamics to San Timoteo Creek Flood-Control Channel, California
    Miscellaneous Paper HL-94-7 October 1994 US Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station Application of a Two-Dimensional Model of Hydrodynamics to San Timoteo Creek Flood-Control Channel, California by Richard L. Stockstill Approved For Public Release; Distribution Is Unlimited TA 7 .W34m HL-94-7 1994 Prepared for U.S. Army Engineer District, Los Angeles a IS sa ©t,Cov The contents of this report are not to be used for advertising, publication, or promotional purposes. Citation of trade names does not constitute an official endorsement or approval of the use of such commercial products. DATE DUE GAYLORD PRINTED IN U.SA, RI IRFAU OF RECLAMATION DENVER LIBRARY 92065456 &• 9206540b Miscellaneous Paper HL-94-7 October 1994 Application of a Two-Dimensional Model of Hydrodynamics to San Timoteo Creek Flood-Control Channel, California by Richard L. Stockstill U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station 3909 Halls Ferry Road Vicksburg, MS 39180-6199 Final report Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited Prepared for U.S. Army Engineer District, Los Angeles Los Angeles, CA 90053-2325 Waterways Experiment Station Cataloging-in-Publication Data Stockstill, Richard L. Application of a two-dimensional model of hydrodynamics to San Timoteo Creek flood-control channel, California / by Richard L. Stockstill; prepared for U.S. Army En­ gineer District, Los Angeles. 49 p .: ill.; 28 cm. — (Miscellaneous paper; HL-94-7) Includes bibliographic references. 1. Flood control — California — San Bernardino County. 2. San Timoteo Creek (Calif.) — Channelization. 3. River engineering — California — San Timoteo Creek. 4. Stream channelization — California— Riverside County. I.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrology of San Bernards Valley, California
    Water-Sttpply and Irrigation Paper No. 142 Series 0, Underground ¥raters, 45 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIRECTOR THE HYDROLOGY OF SAN BERNARDS VALLEY, CALIFORNIA BY WALTER C. MENDENHALL - -""'"OGICA! WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1905 CONTENTS. Letter of transmittal................... .................................. 7 Introduction............................................................. 9 Geographic situation ................................................. 9 Settlement........................................................... 10 Development of irrigation............................................. 10 Bibliography ........................................................ 13 Rainfall ................................................................. 15 Soils...................:................................................ 20 Water supply ............................................................ 23 Effect of forests ...................................................... 23 Return waters....................... ............... ................ 26 San Bernardino artesian area.............................................. 29 Origin of San Bernardino basin... .................................... 30 Depth of the basin ................................................... 31 General classes of rocks,.............................................. 32 Alluvial fans......................................................... 35 Well records........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Ana River Watermaster
    SANTA ANA RIVER WATERMASTER ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT v. CITY OF CHINO, et al. CASE NO. 117628--COUNTY OF ORANGE WATERMASTER MAILING ADDRESS Richard W. Atwater c/o SBVMWD Bill B. Dendy Post Office Box 5906 Samuel H. Fuller San Bernardino CA 92412-5906 Craig D. Miller Telephone 909/387-9200 John V. Rossi FAX 909/387-9247 April 30, 2008 To: Clerk of Superior Court of Orange County and all Parties Re: Watermaster Report for Water Year October 1, 2006 - September 30, 2007 Ladies and Gentlemen: We have the honor of submitting herewith the Thirty-Seventh Annual Report of the Santa Ana River Watermaster. The supporting basic data Appendices are bound separately. The principal findings of the Watermaster for the water year 2006-07 are as follows: At Prado 1 Measured Outflow at Prado 156,147 acre-feet 2 Base Flow at Prado 129,830 acre-feet 3 Annual Weighted TDS in Base and Storm Flows 604 mg/L 4 Annual Adjusted Base Flow 140,216 acre-feet 5 Cumulative Adjusted Base Flow 4,528,055 acre-feet 6 Other Credits (Debits) 5,531 acre-feet 7 Cumulative Entitlement of OCWD 1,554,000 acre-feet 8 Cumulative Credit 3,004,419 acre-feet 9 One-Third of Cumulative Debit 0 acre-feet 10 Minimum Required Base Flow in 2007-08 34,000 acre-feet SANTA ANA RIVER WATERMASTER FOR ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT v. CITY OF CHINO, et al. CASE NO. 117628 - COUNTY OF ORANGE THIRTY-SEVENTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE SANTA ANA RIVER WATERMASTER FOR WATER YEAR OCTOBER 1, 2006 - SEPTEMBER 30, 2007 APRIL 30, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER I - WATERMASTER ACTIVITIES AND WATER CONDITIONS Introduction........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • To Control Flooding, the City of Yucaipa, California, Recently Constructed A
    ALIFORNIA is in the grip of a water crisis. The state, like the rest of C the southwestern United States, has had to cope with numerous challeng- es in recent years, including a nearly decade-long drought on the Colorado River, snowpacks that are below nor- mal, and court-mandated reductions in the amount of water available for delivery by the State Water Project, the massive system of reservoirs, aque- ducts, pipelines, and pumping stations that conveys water to 29 water suppli- Three Basins, ers throughout California. Meanwhile, such factors as climate change, popula- tion growth, and the increasing insta- bility of the water supplies in the delta formed by the confluence of the Sacra- mento and San Joaquin rivers threaten Many Benefits to exacerbate the crisis. To help address these problems, civ- il engineers and others involved in the field of water resources must evaluate To control flooding, the City of Yucaipa, California, individual water projects to determine recently constructed a series of three detention how they might affect the larger wa- tersheds to which they belong. In other basins along Oak Glen Creek. However, the basins are words, an integrated approach to wa- also designed to improve downstream water quality, tershed management is needed. Plac- ing more concrete and building larger promote the infiltration of storm water, and facilitate conveyance systems will not solve the problems. Instead, growth and devel- groundwater recharge, providing a model opment should be guided by what are of integrated watershed management. referred to as the Ahwahnee principles, a set of guidelines to help foster sus- tainable and livable communities that BY JEFFREY K.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Annual Report of Santa Ana River Water Quality
    2019 Annual Report of Santa Ana River Water Quality Final Report Prepared by: July 2020 BASIN MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL REPORT OF SANTA ANA RIVER WATER QUALITY TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................... 1-1 2 DATA COLLECTION .................................................................................. 2-1 3 ANALYSIS OF MONITORING DATA ........................................................... 3-1 3.1 Santa Ana River Reach 2 ................................................................ 3-1 3.2 Santa Ana River Reach 3 ................................................................ 3-5 3.2.1 Below Prado Dam .......................................................... 3-5 3.2.2 Santa Ana River Mainstem between Riverside Narrows and Prado Wetlands ...................................... 3-8 3.3 Santa Ana River Reach 4 ................................................................ 3-9 3.4 Santa Ana River Reach 5 ................................................................ 3-9 4 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................ 4-1 4.1 Conclusions ...................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 Recommendations ........................................................................... 4-3 5 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ........................................................................ 5-1 APPENDICES APPENDIX A WATER QUALITY TRENDS AT BELOW PRADO DAM AND MWD
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Critical Biological Zones in Southern California's
    1 Recommended Critical Biological Zones in Southern California’s Four National Forests: Los Padres · Angeles · San Bernardino · Cleveland Lake Fulmor, San Jacinto Mountains, San Bernardino National Forest. Photo by Monica Bond Monica Bond Curt Bradley 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary . 3 Introduction and Methods . 5 Los Padres National Forest . 6 Angeles National Forest . 10 San Bernardino National Forest . 15 Cleveland National Forest . 20 Literature Cited . 23 Map of Recommended CBZs . 24 We thank the following highly knowledgeable scientists for their input: • Chris Brown – U.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, San Diego • David Goodward – San Bernardino Valley Audubon Society • Frank Hovore – Frank Hovore and Associates, Santa Clarita • Timothy Krantz – University of Redlands and San Bernardino Valley Audubon Society • Fred Roberts – California Native Plant Society • Sam Sweet – Department of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology, U.C. Santa Barbara • Michael Wangler – Department of Science and Engineering, Cuyamaca College 3 Executive Summary With majestic mountains, dramatic coastlines, and a remarkable diversity of wildlands from alpine forests to desert scrublands, Southern California’s four national forests – Los Padres, Angeles, San Bernardino, and Cleveland – are beloved by millions of backpackers, hikers, birdwatchers, hunters and fisherman, and outdoor enthusiasts. Scientists recognize our region as one of the richest areas of plant and animal life on the planet. It is home to roughly 3,000 plant and 500 animal species, many of which are found nowhere else on Earth. Our national forests form the backbone for the conservation of the natural beauty and extraordinary biological diversity of the region. One of the great pleasures of hiking in the forests is to see this diversity, from rare butterflies, fish, frogs, and birds to mule deer, bighorn sheep, and bobcats.
    [Show full text]