DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 63, No. 176/Friday, September

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 176 / Friday, September 11, 1998 / Notices 48715 For Further Information Contact: Mrs. Amy DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and trapezoidal channel for the next 2.2 Kelly, SERDP Program Office, 901 North miles. The public raised concerns for Stuart Street, Suite 303, Arlington, VA or by Department of the Army, Corps of extending the concrete-lined channel telephone at (703) 696±2124. Engineers construction upstream of Barton Road. Dated: September 4, 1998. Public concerns were about esthetics of Intent To Prepare a Draft the creek, wildlife movement, impacts L.M. Bynum, Environmental Impact Statement/ Alternate OSD Federal Liaison Officer, to vegetation, recreation trail usage and Environmental Impact Report (DEIS/ groundwater recharge. The public Department of Defense. EIR) for the San Timoteo Creek Flood [FR Doc. 98±24378 Filed 9±10±98; 8:45 am] desired to construct a natural looking Control Project, Reach 3B, in San channel as much as possible. The San BILLING CODE 5000±04±M Bernardino County, CA Bernardino County Board of Supervisors AGENCY: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, requested the USACOE study and alternative to the authorized project for DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DoD. ACTION: Notice of intent. Reach 3B (proposed construction) that Department of the Air Force would incorporate the public's SUMMARY: San Timoteo Creek, drains a concerns. Intent to Grant an Exclusive Patent watershed of approximately 126 square 3. Proposed Action License miles of the San Bernardino Mountains and foothills in eastern Riverside and Construction of a flood control Pursuant to the provisions of Part 404 San Bernardino Counties. The San channel at San Timoteo Creek, Reach 3B of Title 37, Code of Federal Regulations, Timoteo Creek study area falls within upstream of Barton Road. which implements Public Law 96±517, several small communities including 4. Alternatives Redlands, Colton, Loma Linda, and the the Department of the Air Force a. No Action: Construction of announces its intention to grant ITT City of San Bernardino, California. The study area which includes the 100-year Authorized Plan: Industries, ITT Night Vision Division an (1) Construction of the trapezoidal exclusive license under: United States fllodplain of San Timoteo Creek extends along San Timoteo Creek from a short concrete-lined channel to San Timoteo Patent Application Serial No.08/945,369 distance downstream of Alessandro Canyon Road. filed in the names of Robert L. Crane, (2) Construction of eight sediment Road west to the confluence with the Byron P. Edmonds, Charles C. Lovett, basins from that point to just below Santa Ana River, in the City of San Alessandro Road to trap the sediment and Walter E. Johnson on May 16, 1995, Bernardino. for a ``System and Method for Enhanced and prevent if from clogging the channel ADDRESSES: Commander, U.S. Army Visualization of Subcutaneous downstream. Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District, Structures.'' b. Proposed/Recommended Modified Environmental Design Section, P.O. Box PlanÐReach 3B: The license described above will be 532711, Los Angeles, CA 90053±2325. (1) Construction of the concrete granted unless an objection thereto, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. channel upstream to California Street. together with a request for an Joy Jaiswal, Technical Manager, phone (2) Construction of 11 sediment basins opportunity to be heard, if desired, is (213) 453±3871. to a point 3,000 feet upstream of San received in writing by the addressee set SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Timoteo Canyon Road. forth below within sixty (60) days from (3) The total length of the plan is the date of publication of this Notice. 1. Authorization 10,700 feet (6,300 feet shorter than the Information concerning the application The study of potential flood control authorized project). may be obtained, on request, from the measures for San Timoteo Creek in San c. The USACOE and San Bernadino same addressee. Bernardino County, California was County, the local sponsor, will consider All communications concerning this initially authorized by Public Law 738, public concerns regarding design Notice should be sent to: Mr. Randy 74th Congress, June 22, 1936. refinements, esthetics, cultural Authorization of the recommended plan resources, recreational trail usage, and Heald, Senior Intellectual Property for the Santa Ana River Mainstem, ground water recharge. Counsel, Secretary of the Air Force, including Santiago Creek and Oak Street 5. Scoping Process Office of the General Counsel, SAF/ Drain was the Water Resources GCQ, 1501 Wilson Blvd., Suite 802, Development Act of 1986, Congress a. Potential impacts associated with Arlington, VA 22209±2403, Telephone determined that it was appropriate to the proposed action will be evaluated. No. (703) 696±9037. include San Timoteo Creek in the Resource categories that will be Barbara A. Carmichael, Interim I (authorized) project. In 1988, analyzed are: land use, physical Alternate Air Force Federal Register Liaison Congress authorized a project for flood environment, geology, biological, Officer. control along San Timoteo Creek as part agricultural, air quality, water quality, [FR Doc. 98±24433 Filed 9±10±98; 8:45 am] of the Santa Ana River Mainstem Flood groundwater, transportation/ BILLING CODE 3910±01±P Control Project. communications, hazardous waste, socioeconomic and safety. 2. Background b. Participation of affected Federal, Construction of 3.4 miles of San State, and local resource agencies, Timoteo Creek extending from the Santa Native American groups and concerned Ana River to just upstream of Barton interest groups/individuals is Road, designated as Reach 1, 2 and 3A encouraged in the scoping process. A have been completed. The Public Scoping Meeting will be held improvements consisted of construction September 24, 1998. Time and location of a rectangular conrete-lined channel, of the Public Scoping Meetings also will for approximately the first 1.2 miles, be announced by means of a letter,.
Recommended publications
  • County of Riverside General Plan Reche Canyon/Badlands Area Plan

    County of Riverside General Plan Reche Canyon/Badlands Area Plan

    County of Riverside General Plan Reche Canyon/Badlands Area Plan COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Transportation and Land Management Agency 4080 Lemon Street, 12th Floor Riverside, CA 92501-3634 Phone: (951) 955-3200, Fax: (951) 955-1811 October 2011 County of Riverside General Plan Reche Canyon/Badlands Area Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Vision Summary.......................................................................................................................................................... iv Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................. 1 A Special Note on Implementing the Vision ........................................................................................................ 2 Location ........................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Features ........................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Setting ....................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Unique Features ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 Badlands/Norton Younglove Preserve
  • San Timoteo Creek Habitat Enhancement Project San Bernardino County, California

    San Timoteo Creek Habitat Enhancement Project San Bernardino County, California

    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT San Timoteo Creek Habitat Enhancement Project San Bernardino County, California Project Location and Description The Cities of Loma Linda and Redlands have requested $4,500,240.00 from the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to preserve and enhance wildlife habitat along a portion of San Timoteo Creek. The project covers approximately 6.58 linear miles of San Timoteo Creek, from the confluence of the Santa Ana River to the Riverside County line. The funds will be used for property acquisition and development and implementation of an enhancement plan. The EPA is considering fulfilling this funding request. Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action The purpose of the proposed action is to preserve existing habitat as open space in a land conservancy and to enhance more urbanized areas primarily by establishing native vegetation characteristic of the San Timoteo Creek area. Urbanization and stream channelization for flood control in the City of Loma Linda have resulted in the substantial loss of wildlife habitat in the lower reach of San Timoteo Creek. These activities are needed because San Timoteo Creek provides one of the only remaining linkages that present the opportunity to enhance wildlife corridors between the Santa Ana River and Prado Basins on the west and the San Bernardino, San Gorgonio, and San Jacinto Mountains to the east. This project will also compliment other ongoing conservation efforts upstream on the San Timoteo Creek. Environmental Consequences An Environmental Assessment (EA) was prepared for the San Timoteo Creek Habitat Enhancement Project in conformance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).
  • GEOLOGIC MAP and DIGITAL DATABASE of the REDLANDS 7.5’ QUADRANGLE, SAN BERNARDINO and RIVERSIDE COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA, V

    GEOLOGIC MAP and DIGITAL DATABASE of the REDLANDS 7.5’ QUADRANGLE, SAN BERNARDINO and RIVERSIDE COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA, V

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Open-File Report 03-302 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Description of Map Units, Redlands 7.5’ Quadrangle U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OPEN-FILE REPORT 03-302 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGIC MAP AND DIGITAL DATABASE OF THE REDLANDS 7.5’ QUADRANGLE, SAN BERNARDINO AND RIVERSIDE COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA, v. 1.0 Description of Map Units Geology by J.C. Matti1, D.M. Morton2, B.F. Cox3, and K.J. Kendrick3 Digital preparation by P.M. Cossette4, B. Jones1, and S.A. Kennedy1 Description of Map Units by J.C. Matti1 2003 This database and report are preliminary and have not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government 1U.S. Geological Survey, Tucson, Arizona 2U.S. Geological Survey, Riverside, California 3U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California 4U.S. Geological Survey, Spokane, Washington 1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Open-File Report 03-302 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Description of Map Units, Redlands 7.5’ Quadrangle [This Description of Map Units accompanies the geologic map and digital database of the Redlands 7.5’ quadrangle, San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, California, version 1.0] TABLE OF CONTENTS SURFICIAL DEPOSITS VERY YOUNG SURFICIAL DEPOSITS Very young wash deposits, active (latest Holocene) Very young wash deposits, unit 2 (latest Holocene) Very young wash deposits, unit 1 (latest Holocene) Very
  • Cultural Resources

    Cultural Resources

    The Groves at Loma Linda Specific Plan and Phase Three Concept Area Project Draft EIR - SCH # 2018021064 4.4 – CULTURAL RESOURCES 4.4.1 INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY The information in this Chapter is based on a Phase 1 Cultural Resources Investigation, prepared by McKenna et al., dated January 8, 2018, which reviewed the Specific Plan site conditions and the potential for impacts to cultural resources (see Appendix E of this Draft EIR). Cultural resources are defined as buildings, sites, structures, or objects, each of which may have historical, architectural, archaeological, cultural, or scientific importance. The term cultural resources also encompasses the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) term “historic property” as well as CEQA terms “historic resource” and “unique archaeological resource.” Under the NHPA, historic property refers to a property that is listed on, or determined eligible for listing on, the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Under CEQA, historic resource means a property that is listed on, or determined eligible for listing on the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR). Unique archaeological resources are archaeological artifacts, objects, or sites that contain information to answer important scientific questions, possess a particular quality such as the oldest of its type, or are directly associated with a recognized important prehistoric or historic event or person. Archaeological Records Search McKenna et al. completed a standard archaeological records search through the California State University, Fullerton, South Central Coastal Information Center in Redlands. This research included a review of previously completed projects within one mile of the Specific Plan site; a review of the recorded cultural resources within one mile of the Study Area; a review of listings for the NRHP, CRHR, California Landmarks and California Points of Historical Interest.
  • Routing Diagram of Surface-Water Flow in the San Bernardino Area, California, 1998–PLATE 2 U.S

    Routing Diagram of Surface-Water Flow in the San Bernardino Area, California, 1998–PLATE 2 U.S

    OPEN-FILE REPORT 2005-1278 Pending release as USGS Professional Paper 1734 Routing Diagram of Surface-Water Flow in the San Bernardino area, California, 1998–PLATE 2 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR PREPARED IN COOPERATION WITH Danskin, W.R., McPherson, K.R., and Woolfenden, L.R., 2006, Hydrology, Description of Computer Models, U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT and Evaluation of Selected Water-Management Alternatives in the San Bernardino Area, California R 6 W R 5 W 117 25' R 5 W R 4 W 117 20' 117 15' R 3 W 117 10' R 3 W R 2 W 117 05' Surface-water flow paths [SAR, Santa Ana River; Cr, Creek] Segment Segment Segment Segment Segment Segment Segment Segment Surface-water flow path Surface-water flow path Surface-water flow path Surface-water flow path Surface-water flow path Surface-water flow path Surface-water flow path Surface-water flow path No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. 1 Lytle Creek channel 11 Sweetwater basin 26 unnamed 61 MacQuidy-Severence diversion channel 96 Waterman basin channel 131 Perris Hill basin 181 Oak Creek inflow 236 Mill Creek pipe, diversion 1 to Zanja 2 Lytle Creek turnout, gravel pit for recharge 12 Sweetwater and Devil Canyon, joined 27 Devil Canyon Road storm drain 62 Sycamore basin bypass 97 Waterman basin bypass 132 Del Rosa channel 182 Plunge Creek channel 237 Mill Creek pipe, Tate water-treatment plant 3 Lytle Creek channel 13 Devil Canyon diversion 28 Macy basin bypass 63 Sycamore basin 98 Waterman basin 133 Sand Canyon Dam inflow 183 Elder Creek inflow 238 Mill Creek pipe,
  • Carnivore Survey Report 2009

    Carnivore Survey Report 2009

    Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Biological Monitoring Program Carnivore Survey Report 2009 23 April 2010 Carnivore Survey Report 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................................1 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ...................................................................................................................2 METHODS ....................................................................................................................................................3 TRANSECT SURVEYS..........................................................................................................................3 SURVEY DESIGN ..................................................................................................................6 FIELD PROCEDURE...............................................................................................................6 DATA ANALYSIS..................................................................................................................7 CAMERA STATIONS............................................................................................................................8 HABITAT LINKAGE SURVEYS...........................................................................................................11 INCIDENTAL OBSERVATIONS ...........................................................................................................11
  • One Water One Watershed Plan Update 2018 Moving Forward Together Santa Ana River Watershed

    One Water One Watershed Plan Update 2018 Moving Forward Together Santa Ana River Watershed

    One Water One Watershed Plan Update 2018 Moving forward together Santa Ana River Watershed OWOW PLAN UPDATE 201 8 : MOVING FORWARD TOG ETHER SAWPA COMMISSION APPROVAL CERTIFICATION SAWPA NOVEMBER 2018 OWOW PLAN UPDATE 201 8 : MOVING FORWARD TOG ETHER INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK SAWPA NOVEMBER 2018 OWOW PLAN UPDATE 201 8 : MOVING FORWARD TOG ETHER OWOW STEERING COMMITTEE APPROVAL CERTIFICATION SAWPA NOVEMBER 2018 OWOW PLAN UPDATE 201 8 : MOVING FORWARD TOG ETHER INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK SAWPA NOVEMBER 2018 OWOW PLAN UPDATE 201 8 : MOVING FORWARD TOG ETHER TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS................................................................. ACR-1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................... ES-1 1. INTRODUCTION TO ONE WATER, ONE WATERSHED .................................... 1 1.1. Overview ................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2. History of Santa Ana River Watershed Planning...................................................................... 3 1.2.1. OWOW Plan: Moving Toward Sustainability.............................................................. 4 1.2.2. OWOW 2.0 Plan: Moving into Implementation ........................................................ 6 1.2.3. OWOW Plan Update 2018: MOVING FORWARD TOGETHER .............................. 9 1.3. Integrated Local Water Planning ...............................................................................................
  • Application of a Two-Dimensional Model of Hydrodynamics to San Timoteo Creek Flood-Control Channel, California

    Application of a Two-Dimensional Model of Hydrodynamics to San Timoteo Creek Flood-Control Channel, California

    Miscellaneous Paper HL-94-7 October 1994 US Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station Application of a Two-Dimensional Model of Hydrodynamics to San Timoteo Creek Flood-Control Channel, California by Richard L. Stockstill Approved For Public Release; Distribution Is Unlimited TA 7 .W34m HL-94-7 1994 Prepared for U.S. Army Engineer District, Los Angeles a IS sa ©t,Cov The contents of this report are not to be used for advertising, publication, or promotional purposes. Citation of trade names does not constitute an official endorsement or approval of the use of such commercial products. DATE DUE GAYLORD PRINTED IN U.SA, RI IRFAU OF RECLAMATION DENVER LIBRARY 92065456 &• 9206540b Miscellaneous Paper HL-94-7 October 1994 Application of a Two-Dimensional Model of Hydrodynamics to San Timoteo Creek Flood-Control Channel, California by Richard L. Stockstill U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station 3909 Halls Ferry Road Vicksburg, MS 39180-6199 Final report Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited Prepared for U.S. Army Engineer District, Los Angeles Los Angeles, CA 90053-2325 Waterways Experiment Station Cataloging-in-Publication Data Stockstill, Richard L. Application of a two-dimensional model of hydrodynamics to San Timoteo Creek flood-control channel, California / by Richard L. Stockstill; prepared for U.S. Army En­ gineer District, Los Angeles. 49 p .: ill.; 28 cm. — (Miscellaneous paper; HL-94-7) Includes bibliographic references. 1. Flood control — California — San Bernardino County. 2. San Timoteo Creek (Calif.) — Channelization. 3. River engineering — California — San Timoteo Creek. 4. Stream channelization — California— Riverside County. I.
  • Santa Ana River Watermaster

    Santa Ana River Watermaster

    SANTA ANA RIVER WATERMASTER ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT v. CITY OF CHINO, et al. CASE NO. 117628--COUNTY OF ORANGE WATERMASTER MAILING ADDRESS Richard W. Atwater c/o SBVMWD Bill B. Dendy Post Office Box 5906 Samuel H. Fuller San Bernardino CA 92412-5906 Craig D. Miller Telephone 909/387-9200 John V. Rossi FAX 909/387-9247 April 30, 2008 To: Clerk of Superior Court of Orange County and all Parties Re: Watermaster Report for Water Year October 1, 2006 - September 30, 2007 Ladies and Gentlemen: We have the honor of submitting herewith the Thirty-Seventh Annual Report of the Santa Ana River Watermaster. The supporting basic data Appendices are bound separately. The principal findings of the Watermaster for the water year 2006-07 are as follows: At Prado 1 Measured Outflow at Prado 156,147 acre-feet 2 Base Flow at Prado 129,830 acre-feet 3 Annual Weighted TDS in Base and Storm Flows 604 mg/L 4 Annual Adjusted Base Flow 140,216 acre-feet 5 Cumulative Adjusted Base Flow 4,528,055 acre-feet 6 Other Credits (Debits) 5,531 acre-feet 7 Cumulative Entitlement of OCWD 1,554,000 acre-feet 8 Cumulative Credit 3,004,419 acre-feet 9 One-Third of Cumulative Debit 0 acre-feet 10 Minimum Required Base Flow in 2007-08 34,000 acre-feet SANTA ANA RIVER WATERMASTER FOR ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT v. CITY OF CHINO, et al. CASE NO. 117628 - COUNTY OF ORANGE THIRTY-SEVENTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE SANTA ANA RIVER WATERMASTER FOR WATER YEAR OCTOBER 1, 2006 - SEPTEMBER 30, 2007 APRIL 30, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER I - WATERMASTER ACTIVITIES AND WATER CONDITIONS Introduction........................................................................................................
  • To Control Flooding, the City of Yucaipa, California, Recently Constructed A

    To Control Flooding, the City of Yucaipa, California, Recently Constructed A

    ALIFORNIA is in the grip of a water crisis. The state, like the rest of C the southwestern United States, has had to cope with numerous challeng- es in recent years, including a nearly decade-long drought on the Colorado River, snowpacks that are below nor- mal, and court-mandated reductions in the amount of water available for delivery by the State Water Project, the massive system of reservoirs, aque- ducts, pipelines, and pumping stations that conveys water to 29 water suppli- Three Basins, ers throughout California. Meanwhile, such factors as climate change, popula- tion growth, and the increasing insta- bility of the water supplies in the delta formed by the confluence of the Sacra- mento and San Joaquin rivers threaten Many Benefits to exacerbate the crisis. To help address these problems, civ- il engineers and others involved in the field of water resources must evaluate To control flooding, the City of Yucaipa, California, individual water projects to determine recently constructed a series of three detention how they might affect the larger wa- tersheds to which they belong. In other basins along Oak Glen Creek. However, the basins are words, an integrated approach to wa- also designed to improve downstream water quality, tershed management is needed. Plac- ing more concrete and building larger promote the infiltration of storm water, and facilitate conveyance systems will not solve the problems. Instead, growth and devel- groundwater recharge, providing a model opment should be guided by what are of integrated watershed management. referred to as the Ahwahnee principles, a set of guidelines to help foster sus- tainable and livable communities that BY JEFFREY K.
  • 2019 Annual Report of Santa Ana River Water Quality

    2019 Annual Report of Santa Ana River Water Quality

    2019 Annual Report of Santa Ana River Water Quality Final Report Prepared by: July 2020 BASIN MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL REPORT OF SANTA ANA RIVER WATER QUALITY TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................... 1-1 2 DATA COLLECTION .................................................................................. 2-1 3 ANALYSIS OF MONITORING DATA ........................................................... 3-1 3.1 Santa Ana River Reach 2 ................................................................ 3-1 3.2 Santa Ana River Reach 3 ................................................................ 3-5 3.2.1 Below Prado Dam .......................................................... 3-5 3.2.2 Santa Ana River Mainstem between Riverside Narrows and Prado Wetlands ...................................... 3-8 3.3 Santa Ana River Reach 4 ................................................................ 3-9 3.4 Santa Ana River Reach 5 ................................................................ 3-9 4 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................ 4-1 4.1 Conclusions ...................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 Recommendations ........................................................................... 4-3 5 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ........................................................................ 5-1 APPENDICES APPENDIX A WATER QUALITY TRENDS AT BELOW PRADO DAM AND MWD
  • Santa Ana River Watermaster

    Santa Ana River Watermaster

    SANTA ANA RIVER WATERMASTER ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT v. CITY OF CHINO, et al. CASE NO. 117628--COUNTY OF ORANGE WATERMASTER MAILING ADDRESS Samuel H. Fuller c/o SBVMWD Roy L. Herndon 380 East Vanderbilt Way Thomas A. Love San Bernardino CA 92408-3593 Michael R. Markus Telephone (909) 387-9200 John V. Rossi FAX (909) 387-9247 April 30, 2011 To: Clerk of Superior Court of Orange County and all Parties Re: Watermaster Report for Water Year October 1, 2009 - September 30, 2010 Ladies and Gentlemen: We have the honor of submitting herewith the Fortieth Annual Report of the Santa Ana River Watermaster. The supporting basic data Appendices are bound separately. The principal findings of the Watermaster for the water year 2009-10 are as follows: At Prado 1 Measured Outflow at Prado 243,776 acre-feet 2 Base Flow at Prado 103,099 acre-feet 3 Annual Weighted TDS in Base and Storm Flows 443 mg/L 4 Annual Adjusted Base Flow 125,179 acre-feet 5 Cumulative Adjusted Base Flow 4,905,004 acre-feet 6 Other Credits (Debits) 1,489 acre-feet 7 Cumulative Entitlement of OCWD 1,680,000 acre-feet 8 Cumulative Credit 3,263,211 acre-feet 9 One-Third of Cumulative Debit 0 acre-feet 10 Minimum Required Base Flow in 2010-11 34,000 acre-feet SANTA ANA RIVER WATERMASTER FOR ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT v. CITY OF CHINO, et al. CASE NO. 117628 - COUNTY OF ORANGE FORTIETH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE SANTA ANA RIVER WATERMASTER FOR WATER YEAR OCTOBER 1, 2009 - SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 APRIL 30, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER I - WATERMASTER ACTIVITIES AND WATER CONDITIONS Introduction ............................................................................................................