DOCSLIB.ORG

Resolution Summary 10.15.15 Page 1 of 16 Final

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Final SCHOOL REFORM COMMISSION PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED RESOLUTIONS OCTOBER 15, 2015 I. SCHOOL REFORM COMMISSION SRC-1 Withdrawn by Staff 10.14.15 SRC-2 (Added 9.30.15) Young Scholars Frederick Douglass Charter School – Approval of Charter School Name Change to Frederick Douglass Mastery Charter School WHEREAS, pursuant to the Charter School Law, 24 Pa. C.S.A. § 17-1701-A, et seq. , the School Reform Commission (“SRC”) granted a charter (“Charter”) to Young Scholars Frederick Douglass Charter School (“Charter School”) to operate a public charter school for a term of five (5) years commencing on July 1, 2010; and WHEREAS, the School Reform Commission (“SRC”) renewed the Charter School’s Charter for five-year terms in 2015; and WHEREAS, on or about July 6, 2015, the Charter School changed its name to Frederick Douglass Mastery Charter School by filing the required documents with the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; and WHEREAS, on or about September 4, 2015, the Charter School notified the Internal Revenue Service of the name change; NOW BE IT RESOLVED, that the SRC amends the Charter to change the name of the Charter School from Young Scholars Frederick Douglass Charter School to Frederick Douglass Mastery Charter School; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, that the School District shall not be bound by the terms of this Resolution unless and until the School District and the Chair of the Board of Trustees of the Charter School fully execute an amendment to the charter agreement incorporating the terms of this Resolution; and that all other terms and conditions in the charter agreement shall remain in force for the duration of the Charter term. SRC-3 (Added 9.30.15) Khepera Charter School – Amendment to Change Facilities Location WHEREAS, pursuant to the Charter School Law, 24 Pa. C.S.A. § 17-1701-A, et seq. , the School Reform Commission (“SRC”) granted a charter (“Charter”) to Khepera Charter School (“Charter School”) to operate a public charter school commencing in 2004; and WHEREAS, the School Reform Commission ("SRC") renewed the Charter School's charter in 2009 and 2014; and WHEREAS, under the terms of the Charter School's Charter, the Charter School is authorized to operate at facilities located at 144 W. Carpenter Lane, Philadelphia, PA 19119 and 6611 Anderson Street, Philadelphia, PA 19119; and Questions/Comments are due at [email protected] no later than 4:30 p.m. on Tuesday, October 6, 2015. Please reference the Resolution Number and include your name and email address. SRC Resolution Summary 10.15.15 Page 1 of 16 Final WHEREAS, the Charter School has notified the School District's Charter Schools Office that the Charter School has moved to a new location at 926 Sedgley Avenue, Philadelphia, PA and has provided required documentation to the Charter Schools Office; NOW BE IT RESOLVED, that the SRC amends the Charter to change the authorized location of the Charter School to 926 Sedgley Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19140; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, that the School District shall not be bound by the terms of this Resolution unless and until the Chair of the SRC and the Chair of the Board of Trustees of the Charter School fully execute an amendment to the Charter incorporating the terms of this Resolution; and that all other terms and conditions in the Charter shall remain in force for the duration of the Charter term. SRC-4 (Added 10.14.15) Ratification of Intergovernmental Cooperation Agreement with the City Council of Philadelphia RESOLVED, that the School Reform Commission hereby ratifies the execution, delivery and performance of an Intergovernmental Cooperation Agreement by The School District of Philadelphia and the School Reform Commission with The City Council of Philadelphia. II. EDUCATION SUPPORT SERVICES Human Resources A-1 General/Categorical Funds: Approves Personnel, Terminations RESOLVED, that the School Reform Commission hereby ratifies the appointment of the following persons to the positions, on the effective dates through September 30, 2015 and at the salaries respectively noted, as recommended by the Superintendent, provided that: (a) continued employment of persons appointed to positions funded by categorical grants is contingent upon the availability of grant funds; and (b) persons appointed to positions funded by operating funds, shall report to either the Superintendent or the Deputy Superintendent or their designees, and shall serve at the pleasure of the School Reform Commission. A-2 Donation: $45,080 Acceptance of Donation from Mastery Charter Schools Foundation – School-Base Coaching Program RESOLVED, that the School Reform Commission authorizes The School District of Philadelphia, through the Superintendent or his designee, to accept, with appreciation, the donation of $45,080, from Mastery Charter School as part of a grant from the William Penn Foundation, to pay for school-based peer coaching programs at Nebinger, McDaniel and Mayfair Elementary Schools, for the period commencing October 27, 2015 through June 30, 2016. Description: The School District, in partnership with Mastery and with support from the William Penn Foundation, is seeking to pilot a coaching program that targets a population of District teachers who are currently not served by existing District coaching programs and builds informal leadership capacity within schools to increase the opportunity for professional growth for all teachers. The ultimate goal is to build a program that yields significant gains in student growth and achievement through improved instructional practice, attained through peer coaching. The purpose of this program is to support the creation of an effective, school-based peer-coaching model that leverages excellent teachers to coach other teachers who are either adequate or good at their craft and want to improve from adequate to good or from good to great. Through this program, District master teachers will coach fellow District teachers who voluntarily Questions/Comments are due at [email protected] no later than 4:30 p.m. on Tuesday, October 6, 2015. Please reference the Resolution Number and include your name and email address. SRC Resolution Summary 10.15.15 Page 2 of 16 Final participate in one of three coaching cycles per year. The program expects to impact 30 teachers with 1:1 coaching in each building and 90 teachers across three schools through comprehensive professional development opportunities. The participating schools are Nebinger, McDaniel, and Mayfair, each of which submitted an application of interest to participate in the program. Time for coaching will either be scheduled during release time or compensated prep payback time. Additionally, coaches will be compensated for time spent on the project outside of school hours. The coaches and their principal will receive ongoing professional development from Mastery throughout the school year. Mastery will compile progress data and work with the School District team to access and analyze data available from the District at the teacher and school level to gauge impact of the program. While the focus of the project is on creating a sustainable model inside participating schools for providing effective professional development through peer to peer coaching, the Mastery team with also work with the School District’s Office of Effectiveness to create central leadership for the program so that the District will be able to run the program internally without Mastery supports in the future. The grant funds will pay for EC and release time for peer coaches to support teachers during the school day and after school; for teachers to participate in select professional development after school, and for substitutes when coaches or principals are attending professional development during the day. These funds are directly connected to Resolution A-4, approved by the School Reform Commission on August 20, 2015. ABC Code/Funding Source $40,080.00 A-3 (Updated 10.6.15) Operating Budget: $10,000 Contract Ratification with The New Teacher Project – Candidate Phone Screening Services RESOLVED, that the School Reform Commission hereby ratifies the execution, delivery and performance by The School District of Philadelphia, through the Superintendent, of a contract with The New Teacher Project, Inc, for principal candidate phone screening services, for an amount not to exceed $10,000, for the period commencing February 1, 2015 through June 30, 2015. Description: The School District of Philadelphia’s Office of Recruiting is committed to hiring excellent principals to lead School District schools. To assist the School District with the initial screening of principal applicants, TNTP will conduct principal phone interviews with candidates identified by the School District, using interview questions and a scoring rubric developed by the School District. TNTP will take notes during the phone screening and provide such notes and its screening score to the School District. The School District will use the phone screen notes and score as part of its principal hiring process. This ratification is a result of TNTP being unable to agree to the District's limited contract terms by the required LCA process deadline. As a result, and in the interest of adhering to the principal selection and hiring timelines, TNTP provided the assistance with principal screening for which we were originally contracting. Since then, our legal teams have been in communication and we do not foresee any complications with future contracts. ABC Code/Funding Source $10,000.00 1100-055-9400-283f-3311 Operating
Recommended publications
  • Nomination of Historic Building, Structure, Site, Or

    Nomination of Historic Building, Structure, Site, Or

    NOMINATION OF HISTORIC BUILDING, STRUCTURE, SITE, OR OBJECT PHILADELPHIA REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES PHILADELPHIA HISTORICAL COMMISSION SUBMIT ALL ATTACHED MATERIALS ON PAPER AND IN ELECTRONIC FORM (CD, EMAIL, FLASH DRIVE) ELECTRONIC FILES MUST BE WORD OR WORD COMPATIBLE 1. ADDRESS OF HISTORIC RESOURCE (must comply with an Office of Property Assessment address) Street address: 4105-09 Chestnut Street Postal code: 19106 Councilmanic District: 3rd 2. NAME OF HISTORIC RESOURCE Historic Name: Hamilton School; West Philadelphia Free Library; West Philadelphia Republican Club; Radio Church of God Current/Common Name: Church of God; Gospel Spreading Church 3. TYPE OF HISTORIC RESOURCE Building Structure Site Object 4. PROPERTY INFORMATION Occupancy: occupied vacant under construction unknown Current use: Church 5. BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION See Attached 6. DESCRIPTION See Attached 7. SIGNIFICANCE Please attach the Statement of Significance. Period of Significance (from year to year): from _________1891 to _________1968 Date(s) of construction and/or alteration:_____________________________________1891 _________ Architect, engineer, and/or designer:________________________________________Joseph Anshutz _________ Builder, contractor, and/or artisan:__________________________________________ _________ Original owner:_________________________________________________________LE Roy Bliss Peckham _________ Other significant persons:_________________________________________________Elder Lightfoot Solomon Michaux _________ CRITERIA FOR DESIGNATION: The historic
  • User Guide 2018-2019 School Progress Report User Guide

    User Guide 2018-2019 School Progress Report User Guide

    2018-2019 SCHOOL PROGRESS REPORT User Guide 2018-2019 School Progress Report User Guide Welcome This guide is intended to help you understand the various components that make up the SPR and will cover the following topics: Topic Content Page SPR Components This section provides an overview of the SPR layout and its main 3 & Scoring Overview components. It also provides details on how each metric and domain are scored. Report Types There are four SPR report types. This section explains how a 7 school's report type is determined. Domains The SPR is organized into four domains: Achievement, Progress, 8 Climate, and (for high schools only) College & Career. This section provides a brief overview of each domain. Domain Weights This section explains how each domain is weighted. Because the 9 District is committed to ensuring that all students are learning, the Progress domain is weighted most heavily. Performance Tiers This section explains how a school's progress at the overall, 10 domain, and metric levels is categorized into four performance tiers: Intervene, Watch, Reinforce, and Model. Appendices Additional information on metric definitions; floors, targets, and 11 points possible; peer groups; and schools with consecutive years of overall score improvement. Page 1 2018-2019 School Progress Report User Guide SPR Components & Scoring Overview School Demographics & Performance Tiers Each School Progress Report begins with some basic information about the specific school being evalu- ated. It is formatted as in the sample below. School Name, Address, and The left side of the school demographics section provides all relevant contact Contact Information information for the school being evaluated, including address, phone and fax numbers, and the school's website.
  • 2013-‐2014 Learning Networks

    2013-‐2014 Learning Networks

    2013-2014 Learning Networks NETWORK 1: Dion Betts, Assistant Superintendent Elementary Schools (K-5 and K-8) 24 Middle ScHools 1 High Schools 7 TOTAL 32 SOUTH PHILADELPHIA HIGH SCHOOL • Bregy, F. Amedee K-8 • Childs, George W. K-8 • Fell, D. Newlin K-8 o Jenks, Abram K-4 • McDaniel, Delaplaine K-8 • Southwark K-8 o Key, Francis Scott K-6 • Stanton, Edwin M. K-8 FURNESS HIGH SCHOOL • Jackson, Andrew K-8 • Kirkbride, Elizabeth B. K-8 • Meredith, William M. K-8 • Nebinger, George W. K-8 • Sharswood, George K-8 • Taggart, John H. K-8 • Vare, Abigail K-8 (@G. Washington El) BARTRAM HIGH SCHOOL • Comegys, Benjamin B. K-7 • Longstreth, William K-8 • Penrose K-8 • Tilden, William 5-8 o Catharine, Joseph K-5 • Mitchell, Weir K-6 o Morton, Thomas G. K-5 o Patterson, John M. K-4 MOTIVATION HIGH SCHOOL GAMP ACADEMY AT PALUMBO CAPA Arthur, Chester A. K-8 Girard, Stephen K-4 Note: PA = Promise Academy 1 2013-2014 Learning Networks NETWORK 2: Donyall Dickey, Assistant Superintendent Elementary Schools (K-5 and K-8) 20 Middle ScHools 2 High Schools 6 TOTAL 28 OVERBROOK HIGH SCHOOL • Beeber, Dimner 7-8 o Cassidy, Lewis C. K-6 o Gompers, Samuel K-6 o Overbrook Elementary K-6 • Heston, Edward K-8 • Lamberton K-8 • Overbrook Educational Center 1-8 • Rhoads, James K-8 SAYRE HIGH SCHOOL • Anderson, Add B. K-8 • Barry, Commodore John K-8 (PA) • Bryant, William Cullen K-8 (PA) • Hamilton, Andrew K-8 • Harrington, Avery K-7 • Huey, Samuel B.
  • Mileage, Off-Campus Teaching Sites

    Mileage, Off-Campus Teaching Sites

    Off Campus Teaching Sites MapQuest Driving Shortest Distance/Suggested Route Starting Point: 400 East 2nd Street Mileage (One Mileage (Round Active School District Address way) Trip) Allegheny Intermediate Unit #3 475 East Waterfront Drive, Homestead, PA 15120 222 445 Annville‐Cleona Area School District 520 S White Oak Street, Annville, PA 17003 69 137 Annville Elementary School 205 S. White Oak Street, Annville, PA 17003 68 136 Cleona Elementary School 50 E Walnut St, Cleona, PA 17042 66 132 Annville Cleona Junior/Senior High School 500 South White Oak Street, Annville, PA 17003 69 137 Appalachia IU 8 4500 6th Avenue, Altoona, PA 16602 132 264 Bellefonte Area School District 318 North Allegheny Street, Bellefonte, PA 16823 80 159 Bellefonte Area High School 830 E. Bishop Street, Bellefonte, PA 16823 79 158 Bellefonte Area Middle School 100 North School Street, Bellefonte, PA 16823‐2396 79 158 Bellefonte Elementary 100 West Linn Street, Bellefonte, PA 16823 80 159 Benner Elementary 490 Buffalo Run Road, Bellefonte, PA 16823‐9789 82 165 Marion Walker Elementary 100 School Drive, Bellefonte PA 16823‐9032 70 140 Pleasant Gap Elementary 230 South Main Street, Pleasant Gap PA 16823 83 165 Bensalem Township School District 3000 Donallen Drive, Bensalem, PA 19020 140 280 Belmont Hills Elementary School 5000 Neshaminy Boulevard, Bensalem, PA 19020 139 278 Cornwells Elementary School 2215 Hulmeville Road, Bensalem, PA 19020 141 282 Samuel K. Faust Elementary School 2901 Bellview Dr, Bensalem, PA 19020‐1311 138 276 Benjamin Rush Elementary School 3400 Hulmeville Road, Bensalem, PA 19020 141 281 Russell C. Struble Elementary School 4300 Bensalem Blvd, Bensalem, PA 19020 143 285 Valley Elementary School 3100 Donallen Dr, Bensalem, PA 19020‐1838 140 280 Robert K.
  • The School District of Philadelphia

    The School District of Philadelphia

    The School District of Philadelphia Potential Impact of $94.5M Revenue Reduction on School Budgets Methodology and Notes Key Green Text = Can Be Cut Red Text = Cannot Be Cut Notes: The “Enrollment Teachers” category includes Enrollment Driven Prep Teachers. 2011-12 budget data is post mid-year (December 2011) budget cuts. The Operating Budget Allotment in 2011-12 and 2012-13 is equivalent to the Per School and Per Student Allotments in 2010-11. Enrollment numbers are as projected in the spring preceding each budget year for the purpose of developing school budgets. All data is from the Staffing Management System (SMS). Data is as of 4/26/12. What can and can’t be cut? A decrease in operating revenues would have to be offset by cuts in the Operating Budget only, not in Grants. Grants budget information is shown for reference only. This analysis assumes the Enrollment Driven Teachers category is not cuttable because of maximum class sizes in the PFT collective bargaining agreement. This analysis assumes the following are not “cuttable” in FY13 because of state and federal service requirements; the extent of budget cuts that were already made in FY12; and the time that that would be required to reduce costs by changing the School District’s service model. o Gifted Support o Nursing Services o Special Education – High Incidence and Low Incidence o English as a Second Language (ESOL) o Bilingual Counselor Assistants Why are enrollments and poverty rates provided? Enrollment is important for context for Enrollment Driven Teachers (100% enrollment driven) and Operating Budget Allotment (partially enrollment driven).
  • Education Outreach Programs Annual Report 2018–19

    Education Outreach Programs Annual Report 2018–19

    Education Outreach Programs Annual Report 2018–19 PB THE BARNES FOUNDATION 2018–19 EDUCATION REPORT I Contents 2 About the Barnes 4 School Outreach Programs in Philadelphia and Camden 6 Look! Reflect! Connect! (Pre-K) 10 Pictures and Words (Grade 3) 13 Art of Looking (Grade 5–6) 16 Artist Voices (Grade 7) 19 Community Programming 19 Puentes a las Artes / Bridges to the Arts (Ages 3–5) 21 Additional Programming and Resources for Teachers and Students 21 Community Connections 22 STEAM Initiatives 24 High School Partnerships 25 Single-Visit Opportunities 25 Teacher Training 27 2018–19 Education Outreach Donors 28 Participating Schools Photos by Michael Perez, Sean Murray (p. 2) and Darren Burton (p. 19, 26) SECTION HEADER About the Barnes The Barnes Foundation was founded in 1922 by Dr. a teaching method that encouraged students to read Recent Highlights Albert C. Barnes “to promote the advancement of art as an artist does and to study its formal elements • Nearly 1.8 million visitors since 2012 education and the appreciation of the fine arts and of light, line, color, and space. Dr. Barnes wrote that horticulture.” As a nonprofit cultural and educa- his approach to education “comprises the observation • 240,000+ visitors in 2018 tional institution, the Barnes shares its unparalleled of facts, reflection upon them, and the testing of • 18,000+ member households in 2018 art collection with the public, organizes special the conclusions by their success in application. It exhibitions, and presents education and public pro- stipulates that an understanding and appreciation • 4 million+ online visitors engaged since the gramming that fosters new ways of thinking about of paintings is an experience that can come only launch of the new website in 2017 human creativity.
  • Philadelphia's Renaissance Schools Initiative

    Philadelphia's Renaissance Schools Initiative

    Philadelphia’s Renaissance Schools Initiative: 18 Month Interim Report February 2012 Prepared for the Accountability Review Council by Research for Action Authors Eva Gold, Ph.D. Michael H. Norton Deborah Good, M.S.W. Stephanie Levin, Ph.D. About Research for Action Research for Action (RFA) is a Philadelphia-based nonprofit organization. We seek to use research as the basis for the improvement of educational opportunities and outcomes for traditionally underserved students. Our work is designed to strengthen public schools and postsecondary institutions; provide research-based recommendations to policymakers, practitioners, and the public at the local, state, and national levels; and enrich the civic and community dialogue about public education. For more information, please visit our website at www.researchforaction.org. Acknowledgments This research was commissioned by the Accountability Review Council (ARC) for the School District of Philadelphia. We express our appreciation to Dr. Kenneth Wong, Executive Advisor to the ARC, and Dr. Tonya Wolford from the District, for their guidance of this project. We would also like to thank the District’s research staff, as well as ASPIRA, Mastery Charter Schools, Scholar Academies, and Universal Companies for providing data about the Renaissance Schools. In addition, a very special thanks goes to Central Office staff, the Philadelphia Federation of Teachers, and to the principals, assistant principals, teachers, and School Advisory Councils of the two Promise Academy case study schools for accommodating our requests for interviews and observations, and for graciously sharing their successes and challenges with us. This report was greatly enhanced by the contributions of many RFA staff and interns.
  • Philadelphia, PA 19142 Catchment Area

    Philadelphia, PA 19142 Catchment Area

    Ge r m a n to w n Av e . M a r ke t S t . t. d S oa Br Schuykill Expy. (76) Roosevelt Blvd. V in e S t . De lawa re E Frankford xpy. ( Ave. 95) Letter to Parents and Guardians Dear Parents and Guardians: Choosing a high school is the first step towards choosing your future. In The School District of Philadelphia, we want our students and families to choose wisely and well. As you consider the type of school to best match your child’s talents and interests, this Directory of High Schools provides an overview of program offerings, admission requirements and academic expectations at each of the 49 schools. I hope that you will use this directory as one tool in the high school selection process. You will also want to review your child’s academic history, visit the school and talk to teachers, administrators, students and parents to determine the best fit. This directory includes school profiles, contact information and admission requirements and academic expectations for each school. I hope that you will take the time to consider your goals and how The School District of Philadelphia, with its vast array of programs and services, can help you to achieve them. This is an exciting time for your family. The high school years will pass by much too soon. Take this opportunity to ensure that you open the right door to a promising future. Thanks for your continued support of The School District of Philadelphia. Sincerely, _________________________ William R. Hite, Jr., Ed.D.
  • Community Health Needs Assessment Implementation Plan

    Community Health Needs Assessment Implementation Plan

    Table of Contents Overview of Jefferson Health....................................................................................................2 Overview of the Community Health Needs Assessment and Prioritization Process……………. 4 Overview of the Implementation Plan………………………………………………………………………………….5 Domain: Substance Use and Abuse ……………………………………………………………………………………10 Domain: Behavioral Health…………………………………………………………………………………………………14 Domain: Access to Affordable, Culturally Appropriate Primary and Specialty Care…………..17 Domain: Chronic Disease Prevention and Management…………………………………………………….25 Domain: Social Determinants of Health ………………………………….............................................39 Access to affordable, culturally appropriate primary and specialty care Jefferson Health Community Health Implementation Plan Overview of Jefferson Health Overview of “Jefferson Health” Jefferson Health Hospitals and Thomas Jefferson University are partners in providing excellent clinical and compassionate care for our patients in the Philadelphia region, educating the health professionals of tomorrow in a variety of disciplines and discovering new knowledge that will define the future of clinical care. Jefferson Health (JH), the clinical arm of Thomas Jefferson University, has grown from a three‐ hospital academic health center in 2015 to a 14‐hospital health system through mergers and combinations that include former hospitals at Abington Health, Aria Health, Kennedy Health and Magee Rehabilitation. Jefferson Health has seven Magnet®‐designated hospitals (recognized by the ANCC for nursing excellence); one of the largest faculty‐based telehealth networks in the country; the NCI‐designated Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center (one of only 70 in the country); and more than 40 outpatient and urgent care locations. Thomas Jefferson University Hospital (TJUH), is one of only 14 hospitals in the country that is a Level 1 Trauma Center and a federally designated Regional Spinal Cord Injury Center. It also continues its national record of excellence with recognition from U.S.

  • Elect Site Directory 2017-2018

    ELECT SITE DIRECTORY 2017-2018 Communities In Schools of Philadelphia Program Sites - 338 slots Agency Name School District of Philadelphia Mailing Address 440 N. Broad Street Philadelphia, PA 19130 Phone 215-400-4250 Fax 215-400-4278 Website www.philasd.org Primary Contact Phone Fax Email Nikishia Morgan-Director 215-400-5472 215-400-4278 [email protected] Secondary Contact Phone Fax Email Ieshia Gonis-Program Manager 215-400-5419 215-400-4278 [email protected] Data Contact Phone Fax Email Melissa Wright 215-400-6845 215-400-4278 [email protected] Dimonique Robinson 215-400-5331 215-400-4278 [email protected] ELECTdata@philasd,org Student Support Staff Phone Fax Email Lamar Brennan 215-400-5416 215-400-4278 [email protected] Agency Name Communities In Schools of Philadelphia, Inc. Mailing Address Rodin Place, Suite C100A, 2000 Hamilton Street, Philadelphia, PA 19130 Phone 267-386-4600 Fax 267-330-0164 Website www.cisphl.org Primary Contact Phone Fax Email Treena Reid 267-386-4703 267-330-0164 [email protected] Secondary Contact Phone Fax Email Jennifer Pitt 267-386-4614 267-330-0164 [email protected] Data Contact Phone Fax Email Jennifer Pitt-temporary 267-386-4614 215-330-0164 [email protected] Site Supervisor Site Locations Phone Fax Email Cheryl Phillips Audenried, Ben Franklin HS, Gateway to 267 386-4612 267-330-0164 [email protected] College, Furness, High School of Future, Hill Freeman World Academy, Martin L. King, Overbrook, PLA South, S. Phila. HS, West Phila. HS Jennifer Pitt Bartram, Camelot Academy, Excel North and 267-386-4614 267-330-0164 [email protected] South, Frankford, Liguori Academy, OIC- CADI, One Bright Ray Elmwood Campus, PA Cyber, Penn Treaty, Sayre Marcus Godfrey Big Picture- Vaux, Boys Latin, Camelot E., 215-687-5087 267-330-0164 [email protected] Fels, Philadelphia Virtual Academy, PLA- North (Alternative Education Regional Center) PROGRAM SITES School Schedule ELECT Room Case Manager Phone/Email Audenried Wed.
  • User Guide 2016-2017 School Progress Report User Guide

    User Guide 2016-2017 School Progress Report User Guide

    2016-2017 SCHOOL PROGRESS REPORT User Guide 2016-2017 School Progress Report User Guide Welcome This guide is intended to help you understand the various components that make up the SPR and will cover the following topics: Topic Content Page SPR Components This section provides an overview of the SPR layout and its main 3 & Scoring Overview components. It also provides details on how each metric and domain are scored. Report Types There are four SPR report types. This section explains how a 7 school's report type is determined. Domains The SPR is organized into four domains: Achievement, Progress, 8 Climate, and (for high schools only) College & Career. This section provides a brief overview of each domain. Domain Weights This section explains how each domain is weighted. Because the 9 District is committed to ensuring that all students are learning, the Progress domain is weighted most heavily. Performance Tiers This section explains how a school's progress at the overall, 10 domain, and metric levels is categorized into four performance tiers: Intervene, Watch, Reinforce, and Model. Appendices Additional information on metric definitions; floors, targets, and 11 points possible; and peer groups. Page 2 2016-2017 School Progress Report User Guide SPR Components & Scoring Overview School Demographics & Performance Tiers Each School Progress Report begins with some basic information about the specific school being evalu- ated. It is formatted as in the sample below. School Name, Address, and The left side of the school demographics section provides all relevant contact Contact Information information for the school being evaluated, including address, phone and fax numbers, and the school's website.
  • User Guide 2014-2015 School Progress Report User Guide

    User Guide 2014-2015 School Progress Report User Guide

    2014-2015 SCHOOL PROGRESS REPORT User Guide 2014-2015 School Progress Report User Guide Welcome This guide is intended to help you understand the various components that make up the SPR and will cover the following topics: SPR Components & Scoring This section provides an overview of the SPR layout and its main components. Overview It also provides details on how each metric and domain are scored. Report Types There are four SPR report types. This section explains how a school's report type is determined. Domains The SPR is organized into four domains: Achievement, Progress, Climate, and (for high schools only) College & Career. This section provides a brief overview of each domain. Domain Weights This section explains how each domain is weighted. Because the District is committed to ensuring that all students are learning, the Progress domain is weighted most heavily. Performance Tiers This section explains how a school's progress at the overall, domain, and metric levels is categorized into four performance tiers: Intervene, Watch, Reinforce, and Model. City and Peer Ranks This section explains how the SPR compares the scores of different schools. The Peer Rank accounts for differences in the student populations that schools serve and ensures that comparisons between schools are fair and equitable. Appendices Additional information on metric definitions; floors, targets, and points possible; and peer groups. 2014-2015 School Progress Report User Guide SPR Components & Scoring Overview School Demographics & Performance Tiers Each School Progress Report begins with some basic information about the specific school being evalu- ated. It is formatted as in the sample below.