Political Reviews

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Political Reviews Political Reviews Micronesia in Review: Issues and Events, 1 July 2016 to 30 June 2017 michael lujan bevacqua, elizabeth ua ceallaigh bowman, monica c labriola, clement yow mulalap Polynesia in Review: Issues and Events, 1 July 2016 to 30 June 2017 peter clegg, lorenz gonschor, margaret mutu, chris nobbs, ‘umi perkins, steven ratuva, forrest wade young The Contemporary Pacic, Volume 30, Number 1, 125–213 © 2018 by University of Hawai‘i Press 125 Polynesia in Review: Issues and Events, 1 July 2016 to 30 June 2017 Reviews of American Sāmoa, Cook associate members since 2006, was Islands, Niue, Sāmoa, Tokelau, upgraded to full membership in the Tuvalu, and Wallis and Futuna organization (pir, 10 Sept 2016). are not included in this issue. While appearing at first glance a gesture of appreciation toward the French Polynesia two large French overseas possessions The year under review was again by their independent Pacific neighbors, relatively calm, without major politi- full membership for French Polyne- cal upheavals. Backed by a surpris- sia—as for New Caledonia—was in ingly stable majority in the Assembly fact highly controversial, both within of French Polynesia for his Tapura the country and among the larger Huiraatira party, President Édouard Pacific community. The government of Fritch continued leading the coun- French Polynesia and especially Presi- try with an essentially conservative dent Fritch, who was present in Pohn- political agenda, not aiming at major pei, surely expressed their satisfaction institutional or policy changes. On the and joy to have at last reached formal regional level, the country gained the equality with the neighbor countries, controversial distinction of becoming as did the president of New Caledo- a full member of the Pacific Islands nia’s government, Philippe Germain. Forum (pif). National elections in But, just like the Kanak pro-inde- France brought some fresh air into the pendence parties in New Caledonia, local political scene, giving Fritch’s Papeete’s pro-independence opposi- camp the opportunity to measure tion strongly opposed full member- its popular support, while the pro- ship and had in fact lobbied against independence opposition was able to it as much as possible (rnz, 11 Sept place its first-ever representative in 2016). Opposition leader and former the French National Assembly. At the French Polynesia President Oscar same time, the massive reconfiguration Temaru, head of the pro-independence of the political scene in Paris during Tavini Huiraatira party and the larger those elections has the potential to opposition coalition Union pour induce changes in the local configura- la Démocratie (upld), had always tions in Papeete over the coming years. warned that premature membership The first consequential political before having reached either indepen- event affecting the territory dur- dence or full self-government could ing the review period happened far jeopardize or at least slow down the away on Pohnpei in the Federated decolonization process, since it weak- State of Micronesia, where the pif ens the position of the Island states annual meeting took place from 8 to to put pressure on France in order 10 September 2016, and the status of to accelerate that process, making French Polynesia and New Caledonia, it more attractive to local leaders to 156 political reviews • polynesia 157 insist on complete decolonization as a non-Western powers (rnz, 14 Sept precondition for full pif membership. 2016; otr, 18 Sept 2016). Indeed, the acceptance of the two Armed with pif membership as territories as full members clearly evidence of tacit regional approval contradicts the self-definition of the of the country’s current relationship Pacific Islands Forum as consisting with France, in early October 2016 of “independent and self-governing Fritch attended the meeting of the states” (pif Secretariat 2017). This United Nations’ Special Commit- makes sense, since in only partially tee on Decolonization in New York self-governing territories such as to lobby for the removal of French French Polynesia, the colonial metrop- Polynesia from the United Nations olis—France, in this case—continues list of Non-Self-Governing Territories to have decisive influence. And it must (nsgts), to which it had been re-added be recalled that the pif was founded in in 2013. Fritch, the first-ever pro- 1971 specifically to create an organi- French local political leader to attend zation run by Island leaders in which such a meeting, argued that since colonial powers (specifically France, pro-French parties held the majority in with its extremely reactionary colonial the local assembly, decolonization was policies at the time) had no possibil- not desired by the local people, and ity to interfere (Fry 2015, 3–4). Since furthermore, that acceptance into the according to the organic law of French Pacific Islands Forum demonstrated Polynesia foreign affairs is an area of that such a process was unnecessary responsibility of the French national (pir, 4 Oct 2016). government and not of the semiauton- But this turned out to be a futile omous country government, the latter undertaking. Without checkbook- cannot make its own decisions in this wielding regional hegemons like Aus- field without prior approval from tralia and New Zealand in the room, a Paris. Hence, decolonization experts body run entirely by nonaligned coun- warned that membership for French tries of the Global South like the UN Polynesia and New Caledonia would Decolonization Committee was not be tantamount to a Trojan horse for easily impressed by Fritch’s efforts. France to enter the Pacific Islands Furthermore, the pro-French party Forum (otr, 19 Sept 2016). Tahoeraa Huiraatira of former Presi- It was also suspected that Australia dent Gaston Flosse, the third force in and New Zealand, whose geopo- the local assembly, from which Fritch’s litical interests appear to align ever movement had split in 2015, publicly more closely with those of France, disavowed Fritch’s New York mission were exerting pressure on the smaller and denied his authority to speak for island states to accept this de facto all “autonomist” (ie, anti-indepen- membership of France, in order to dence) locals (TI, 3 Oct 2016). Unlike obtain a further ally to support their the Pacific Islands Forum, the United neocolonial regional hegemony in the Nations would not bend its rules on Pacific Islands Forum and to contain decolonization. And as these rules the ramifications of Fiji’s alternative stand, only a UN-supervised referen- partnerships with China and other dum of self-determination, resulting in 158 the contemporary pacific • 30:1 (2018) either independence, free association, als” and requested UN authorities to or full integration (ie, becoming an monitor the impact of French nuclear administrative unit of metropolitan testing on the territory’s environ- France in this case) would lead to ment and its people’s health (United a removal from the list. In the end, Nations 2016). Moetai Brotherson, Tavini Huiraati- Meanwhile, back home, the ghosts ra’s representative at the Decoloniza- of the past were catching up with tion Committee meeting, provided President Fritch, reminding everyone more convincing counterpoints at the that, despite his efforts to style himself meeting, highlighting the fact that the as a new, rational, and forward-look- country’s “relisting on the UN list ing leader in local politics, he was far in 2013 gave France bad reasons to from a blank slate, as in late Septem- want us in the Forum, but at the same ber he was sentenced to repay 6.5 time gave our Pacific brothers a noble million cfp francs in salaries that he motivation to welcome us in” (otr, 7 had received for a “fictional employ- Oct 2016). ment” in the presidential office under Based on a draft prepared by Flosse between 1996 and 2004, part the Decolonization Committee, the of a large scheme of illegal funding UN General Assembly unanimously of Tahoeraa (Pacnews, 1 Oct 2016). adopted Resolution 71-120 on the (One hundred cfp francs is approxi- question of French Polynesia on 6 mately us$1.00.) Flosse himself and December 2016. While taking note of several others were sentenced to pay pif membership for the territory, the back an overall sum of 243 million resolution once more chastised France cfp francs to the public treasury (TI, for refusing to cooperate and submit 22 Sept 2016). information on the territory—this was But apparently this type of behavior the third year in a row that French was not confined to the recent past, Polynesia was the only nsgt for which as in mid-October, Flosse and Assem- the administrative power refused to bly Speaker Marcel Tuihani, Fritch’s submit any information, in violation successor as Flosse’s lieutenant party of its obligation to do so under article leader, were detained for questioning 73e of the UN charter. As in the year about a current suspected “fictional before, the UN General Assembly employment” of four Tahoeraa party urged France to work with both the members at the assembly’s secre- territory and appropriate UN bodies tariat, at a combined annual salary to educate the people on their right of of over 36 million cfp francs (pir, self-determination and to implement it 15 Oct 2016). Just a few days earlier, without delay. In addition, this year’s Flosse and his partner Pascale Haiti resolution contained much stronger had been sentenced to pay a fine of 3 language in support of the country’s million cfp francs for stealing expen- economic and ecological rights, under- sive silverware from the presidential lining “the permanent sovereignty of palace after Flosse’s removal from the the people of French Polynesia over presidency due to the confirmation their natural resources, including of another corruption conviction on marine resources and undersea miner- appeal in 2014 (rnzi, 12 Oct 2013).
Recommended publications
  • Du Premier Au Second Gouvernement Temaru: Une Annee De Crise Politique Et Institutionnelle
    1 DU PREMIER AU SECOND GOUVERNEMENT TEMARU: UNE ANNEE DE CRISE POLITIQUE ET INSTITUTIONNELLE Emmanuel­Pie Guiselin * Il arrive parfois que le temps politique s’accélère. Pour la Polynésie française, une page clef de l’histoire vient de s’écrire avec le retour au pouvoir de l’Union pour la démocratie (UPLD) et de son leader Oscar Temaru. Ce retour est intervenu à la faveur des élections partielles du 13 février 2005, moins de cinq mois après que le premier gouvernement Temaru ait été renversé par une motion de censure. Entre l’UPLD et le Tahoeraa Huiraatira, entre Oscar Temaru et Gaston Flosse, le cadre statutaire et le mode de scrutin ont constitué la toile de fond d’un combat plus profond mettant aux prises légalité et légitimité. Sometimes the political tempo of a country speeds up. In the case of French Polynesia, a major chapter in its history was written with the return to power of the Union for Democracy party (UPLD) and its leader Oscar Temaru. This came about as a result of the partial elections of 13 February 2005, that is less than 5 months after the first Temaru government had been ousted by a censure motion. Between UPLD and Tahoeraa Hiuraatira, between Oscar Temaru and Gaston Flosse, the legal framework and the voting system created the backdrop for a significant battle concerning legality and legitimacy. 27 février 2004, 7 mars 2005 1. Un peu plus de douze mois séparent ces deux dates, la première marquant la promulgation de la loi organique relative au nouveau statut d’autonomie de la Polynésie française 2, la seconde portant présentation du second gouvernement constitué par Oscar Temaru.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 8 January 2021 English Original: French
    United Nations A/AC.109/2021/7 General Assembly Distr.: General 8 January 2021 English Original: French Special Committee on the Situation with regard to the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples French Polynesia Working paper prepared by the Secretariat Contents Page The Territory at a glance ......................................................... 3 I. Constitutional, political and legal issues ............................................ 5 II. Economic conditions ............................................................ 8 A. General ................................................................... 8 B. Agriculture, pearl farming, fisheries and aquaculture ............................. 9 C. Industry .................................................................. 9 D. Transport and communications ............................................... 10 E. Tourism .................................................................. 10 F. Environment .............................................................. 10 III. Social conditions ............................................................... 11 A. General ................................................................... 11 B. Employment .............................................................. 11 C. Education ................................................................. 12 D. Health care ................................................................ 12 IV. Relations with international organizations and
    [Show full text]
  • Europe's Evolving Deterrence Discourse
    EUROPE’S EVOLVING DETERRENCE DISCOURSE EDITED BY AMELIA MORGAN AND ANNA PÉCZELI Center for Global Security Research Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory February 2021 EUROPE’S EVOLVING DETERRENCE DISCOURSE EDITED BY AMELIA MORGAN AND ANNA PÉCZELI Center for Global Security Research Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory King's College London Science Applications International Corporation February 2021 EUROPE’S EVOLVING DETERRENCE DISCOURSE | 1 This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in part under Contract W-7405-Eng-48 and in part under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. The views and opinions of the author expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC. ISBN-978-1-952565-09-0 LCCN-2020922986 LLNL-TR-815694 TPG-60099 2 | AMELIA MORGAN AND ANNA PÉCZELI Contents About the Contributors 2 Preface Brad Roberts 7 Introduction Amelia Morgan and Heather Williams 8 The (Incomplete) Return of Deterrence Michael Rühle 13 The German Debate: The Bundestag and Nuclear Deterrence Pia Fuhrhop 27 The Dutch Debate: Activism vs. Pragmatism Michal Onderco 39 French Perspectives on Disarmament and Deterrence Emmanuelle Maitre 51 Nuclear Deterrence and Arms Control: A NATO Perspective Jessica Cox and Joseph Dobbs 66 Defining the Needed Balance of Deterrence and Arms Control in Europe Anna Péczeli 74 Restoring the Balancing Act: Disarmament and Deterrence in the New Era Łukasz Kulesa 93 Rethinking the Impact of Emerging Technologies on Strategic Stability Andrea Gilli and Mauro Gilli 105 Artificial Intelligence and Deterrence: A View from Europe Laura Siddi 121 A Practitioner’s Perspective: Modern Deterrence and the U.S.–U.K.
    [Show full text]
  • Experts' Opinions on the Current Touristic Situation in French Polynesia
    Trouble in Paradise: Experts’ opinions on the current touristic situation in French Polynesia Céline Perelli A thesis submitted to: Auckland University of Technology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters in International Hospitality Management 2013 School of Hospitality and Tourism Supervisors: Dr. Hamish Bremner and Dr. David Williamson i Table of Contents Chapter One: Introduction……………………………………………………………..1 1.0 Research context…………………………………………………………….2 Chapter Two: French Polynesia-The myth unraveled…………………………………9 2.0 Introduction………………………………………………………………...10 2.1 The discovery of Paradise and its colonization…………………………….10 2.2 Tahiti and her islands………………………………………………………13 2.3 Social, cultural and economic background of French Polynesia…………..20 2.3.1 Population………………………………………………………….20 2.3.2 Employment, income and tourism…………………………………21 2.3.3 French financial support…………………………………………...22 2.4 The French government……………………………………………………23 2.5 Tourism and its wastelands………………………………………………...25 Chapter Three: Literature review…………………………………………………….30 3.0 Introduction………………………………………………………………...31 3.1 Destination competitiveness theory………………………………………..31 3.2 Tourism marketing mix…………………………………………………….35 3.3 Strategic planning………………………………………………………….37 3.4 Strategic implementation…………………………………………………..38 3.5 The C.O.S.T strategic plan (Conseil d’Orientation Stratégique du Tourisme)…………………………………………………………………………….40 3.6 The implementation of the C.O.S.T strategic plan………………………...44 Chapter Four: Methodology………………………………………………………….46
    [Show full text]
  • Polynésie Française
    United Nations Nations Unies HEADQUARTERS • SIEGE NEW YORK, NY 10017 TEL.; 1 (212) 963.1234 • FAX'. 1 (212) 963.4879 Distr. RESTRICTED P RS/2018/C RR 16 ORIGINAL: FRENCH/ENGLISH THIRD INTERNATIONAL DECADE FOR THE ERADICATION OF COLONIALISM Pacific regional seminar on the implementation of the Third International Decade for the Eradication of Colonialism: towards the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals in the Non-Self-Governing Territories: social, economic and environmental challenges Saint Georgeis, Grenada 9 to 11 May 2018 STATEMENT BY MR. ENGEL RAYGADAS (FRENCH POLYNESIA) franÿaiS/english Expos6 du repr6sentant de la Polyn6sie frangaise Sÿminaire rÿgional pour le Pacifique sur la mise en oeuvre de la troisiÿme Dÿcennie de l'ÿlimination du colonialisme "Towards the achivement of the Sustainable Development Goals in the non-self-governing territories: social, economic and environmental challenges" Saint Georges - Grenade 9 au 11 mai 2018 Monsieur le President du Comitÿ special de dÿcolonisation, Mesdames et Messieurs les reprÿsentants des Etats membres des Nations Unies, Mesdames et Messieurs, - Permettez-moi de remercier chaleureusement le gouvernement et le peuple de la Grenade pour son accueil et son hospitalitY. - M. le President, je fÿlicite votre ÿlection en tant que President du C24 et je suis certain que vous donnerez au comitÿ un souffle nouveau. 1. Evolution du C24 - Je voudrais rendre hommage aux membres de ce comitÿ qui l'ont rejoint parce qu'ils croient vÿritablement que la libertÿ est le principe fondamental de l'autodÿtermination. Je voudrais les remercier pour leurs efforts visant ÿ tirer le comitÿ dans le XXle siÿcle et ÿ engager une nouvelle rÿflexion sur son r61e et sur la maniÿre dont il pourrait ÿvoluer.
    [Show full text]
  • Power Switching and Renewal in French Polynesian Politics 1
    Power switching and renewal in French Polynesian politics 1 Power switching and renewal in French Polynesian politics the importance of 2004 Bruno Saura translated by Bess Flores Abstract The year 2004 saw great upheavals in the political situation in Tahiti, and may prove to be a very important year in the history of French Polynesia as a whole. The May elections for the Territorial Assembly, and thus for the President of the territory, resulted for the first time in the victory of Oscar Temaru. A long-time challenger of the outgoing President Gaston Flosse, Temaru had suspended his programme of immediate independence in favour of an ideological breathing space of several years, with two aims: to break Gaston Flosse’s autocratic grip on power, and to set up real and sustainable development processes. Oscar Temaru became President at the head of an unstable majority in May 2004 but lost power to Gaston Flosse in October 2004. He was re-elected, again with a fragile majority, in the February 2005 elections. This article, based on the facts of 2004 and early 2005, reveals the metropolitan French government’s lack of neutrality in the electoral process (notably by adopting a system intended to favour Gaston Flosse). It examines the relationship between politics and religion in French Polynesia; highlights cultural factors in French Polynesian politics, notes the emergence of young potential leaders, and thereby explains the reasons for the political rise and fall and rise again of Oscar Temaru. Keywords elections; French Polynesia; politics and religion; Tahiti. The Journal of Pacific Studies, Volume 28, no.1, 2005, 1–22 © by JPacS Editorial Board (SSED,USP) 1 2 The Journal of Pacific Studies Vol.28 no.1, 2005 Résumé L’année politique 2004 à Tahiti a connu de grands bouleversements.
    [Show full text]
  • LA VIE POLITIQUE EN POLYNÉSIE FRANÇAISE Penser Les Antipodes
    Jean-Marc Regnault Université de la Polynésie française LA VIE POLITIQUE EN POLYNÉSIE FRANÇAISE Penser les antipodes À Papeete (juillet 1964), Georges Pompidou déclarait : « J'ai constaté que la politique poly­ nésienne est extrêmement compliquée [...] il y a des mouvements politiques, des personnalités politiques et des nuances qui sont longues à comprendre ». La vie politique, en Polynésie, obéit en effet à des règles originales. À première vue, les institutions, les partis, la vie associative laissent penser que les îles sont le prolongement de la métropole. En réalité, l'observateur doit faire un effort pour comprendre ce qu'est un territoire d'outre-mer, c'est-à-dire un milieu qui a sa culture propre, des pratiques particulières, déterminées par la géographie, l'histoire, le souvenir de la colo­ nisation, la démographie et les mentalités. La présence française a imposé un cadre institutionnel et politique à l'intérieur duquel la culture et les pratiques locales bousculent les principes impor­ tés. Les hommes politiques, les électeurs jouent habilement sur les divers registres de la « tradition » culturelle et de la « modernité » démocratique (Al Wardi, 1998). Caractéristiques essentielles de la vie politique locale La règle a longtemps été la multiplicité des partis à l'existence éphémère, favorisée par l'élec­ tion au scrutin à la proportionnelle aux élections territoriales. Dans les circonscriptions des archi- HERMÈS 32-33, 2002 521 Jean-Marc Regnault pels éloignés, on peut être élu avec quelques centaines de voix. La tentation est forte de constituer un mouvement à base géographique en jouant sur le particularisme de telle île, à base ethnique ou à base religieuse.
    [Show full text]
  • The Question of French Polynesia Student Officer
    Forum: General Assembly 4 (Special Political and Decolonization) Issue: The question of French Polynesia Student Officer: Saulet Tanirbergen Position: Deputy Chair Introduction French Polynesia is an overseas collectivity, often times referred to as an overseas country, of the Republic of France. It was a colony of France since the 19th century and had only gained its’ internal autonomy in the recent decades. French Polynesia has a very unique government. It’s autonomy is greater than most other overseas collectivities of France. French Polynesia has acquired autonomy in all areas except those relating to police, monetary policy, tertiary education, immigration, and defense and foreign affairs. It even has an assembly and a President, whose duties are fashioned after those of the Prime Minister. However, French Polynesia has a very heavy history with nuclear testing that lasted for 30 years. It is often a subject of debate between the French national government and certain French Polynesian political members. It is also a region where the question of independence is very heated and relevant. Many French Polynesian politicians are openly outspoken against France and wish for independence. However, it has not yet had an independence referendum like New Caledonia, a fellow overseas collectivity, did. However, it is also important to note that many in that region do not wish to be separated from France. This is furthered by the results of the New Caledonian referendum, which led to New Caledonia retaining its’ status as a French overseas collectivity. In order to resolve this issue as best as possible, it is important to understand that this is a multi-faceted and complex issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal De La Société Des Océanistes, 140 | Janvier-Juin 2015 Regional Horizons and Oceania Variations in French Overseas Territories 2
    Journal de la Société des Océanistes 140 | janvier-juin 2015 Intégration régionale des territoires français dans le Pacifique Sud Regional Horizons and Oceania variations in French overseas territories Horizons régionaux et variations océaniennes des territoires français Rudy Bessard and Nathalie Mrgudovic Translator: Beverly Adab Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/jso/7321 DOI: 10.4000/jso.7321 ISSN: 1760-7256 Publisher Société des océanistes Printed version Date of publication: 15 June 2015 ISBN: 9782854301250 ISSN: 0300-953x Electronic reference Rudy Bessard and Nathalie Mrgudovic, « Regional Horizons and Oceania variations in French overseas territories », Journal de la Société des Océanistes [Online], 140 | janvier-juin 2015, Online since 20 July 2015, connection on 22 September 2020. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/jso/7321 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/jso.7321 This text was automatically generated on 22 September 2020. © Tous droits réservés Regional Horizons and Oceania variations in French overseas territories 1 Regional Horizons and Oceania variations in French overseas territories Horizons régionaux et variations océaniennes des territoires français Rudy Bessard and Nathalie Mrgudovic Translation : Beverly Adab « Regional identity […] has been constructed on a foundation of concrete reality. That the sea is as real as you and I […], that it shapes the character of this planet, that it is a major source of our sustenance, that it is something that we all share in common wherever we are in Oceania – all of these are statements of fact. Yet beyond that level of everyday experience, the sea is our pathway to each other and to everyone else, the sea is our endless saga, the sea is our most powerful metaphor, the ocean is in us.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 3 October 2019
    United Nations A/C.4/74/2 General Assembly Distr.: General 3 October 2019 Original: English Seventy-fourth session Special Political and Decolonization Committee (Fourth Committee) Agenda item 59 Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples Question of French Polynesia Requests for hearing* The Chair of the Fourth Committee has received 32 requests to petition the Committee on the question of French Polynesia, as listed below. Name Organization Date request received 1. Teva Rohfritsch Government of French Polynesia 2 September 2019 2. Georges Moarii Armement Georges Moarii 2 September 2019 3. Lana Tetuanui French Republic Upper House 2 September 2019 4. François Pihaatae Ma’ohi Protestant Church 23 September 2019 5. James Bhagwan Pacific Conference of Churches 23 September 2019 6. Tiare Maohi Tairua Union chrétienne des jeunes gens 23 September 2019 7. Philippe Neuffer Association Moruroa e tatou 23 September 2019 8. Auguste Uebe-Carlson Association 193 23 September 2019 9. Maxime Chan Association Te Rauatiati 23 September 2019 10. Jerry Gooding Pearl Farm in Rikitea 23 September 2019 11. Hinamoeura Cross Société Les Saveurs du Vaima 23 September 2019 12. Oscar Manutahi Temaru City of Faa’a, Tahiti 23 September 2019 13. David Koubbi Bar Association of Paris 23 September 2019 * Circulated in accordance with a decision taken by the Committee at its 1st meeting, on 3 October 2019. 19-16874 (E) 041019 *1916874* A/C.4/74/2 Name Organization Date request received 14. Antony Geros Tavini Huiraatira Group within the 23 September 2019 Assembly of French Polynesia 15. Valentina Cross City of Teva I Uta, Tahiti 23 September 2019 16.
    [Show full text]
  • Conflicting Autonomist and Independentist Logics in French Polynesia
    CONFLICTING AUTONOMIST AND INDEPENDENTIST LOGICS IN FRENCH POLYNESIA ANNE-CHRISTINE TRÉMON Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales (EHESS), Paris On 3 March 2005, the election of the Tavini Huiratiraa’s leader, independentist Oscar Temaru, as President of French Polynesia put an end to several months of political crisis, institutional impasse and power vacancy.1 The crisis had been triggered by the overthrow of the first Temaru government in October 2004. The UPLD (Union pour la Démocratie) coalition of parties around Temaru’s Tavini2 had won the Assembly elections in May 2004 with a small majority against Gaston Flosse’s autonomist Tahoeraa Huiratiraa.3 Together with its autonomist allies,4 UPLD held 29 seats against 28 Tahoeraa seats in the Assembly. The sudden desertion of one Tavini representative to Tahoeraa allowed the overthrow of the Temaru government on 9 October. Accusing Gaston Flosse of corruption, Temaru and his supporters called upon President Jacques Chirac to dissolve the French Polynesian Assembly and to hold new elections. However the Minister for Overseas France, Brigitte Girardin, stated in response that the “State does not have to follow up the demand for dissolution” of the Assembly. On 16 October, an unprecedented demonstration took place on the island of Tahiti. More than 20,000 people (approximately 10 percent of the total population) marched in the streets of the capital, Papeete, asking for dissolution.5 For the first time in French Polynesia’s history, demonstrations also took place in Nuku Hiva (Marquesas) and Rangiroa (Tuamotu). The State Council (France’s highest administrative court) confirmed the French President’s refusal to dissolve French Polynesia’s Assembly.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 4 October 2018
    United Nations A/C.4/73/2 General Assembly Distr.: General 4 October 2018 Original: English Seventy-third session Special Political and Decolonization Committee (Fourth Committee) Agenda item 63 Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples Question of French Polynesia Requests for hearing* The Chair of the Fourth Committee has received 27 requests to petition the Committee on the question of French Polynesia, as listed below. Name Organization Date request received 1. Teva Rohfritsch Government of French Polynesia 29 August 2018 2. Gaston Tong Sang Assembly of French Polynesia 29 August 2018 3. Lana Tenuanui French Republic Upper House, Chair of the 29 August 2018 French extra-parliamentarian follow-up commission on financial compensation for the victims of nuclear testing 4. Felix Tokoragi Municipality of Makemo Atoll in the 29 August 2018 Tuamotu Archipelago 5. Taaroanui Maraea Ma’ohi Protestant Church 27 September 2018 6. François Pihaatae Pacific Conference of Churches 27 September 2018 7. Peter Prove Conseil oeucuménique des églises 27 September 2018 8. Tiare Maohi Tairua Union chrétienne des jeunes gens de Polynésie 27 September 2018 9. Phillippe Neuffer NEUFFER law firm 27 September 2018 10. Roland Oldham Association Moruroa e tatou 27 September 2018 11. Auguste Uebe-Carlson Association 193 27 September 2018 * Circulated in accordance with a decision taken by the Committee at its 1st meeting, on 4 October 2018. The original requests are on file with the Secretariat and are available for review. 18-16343 (E) 051018 *1816343* A/C.4/73/2 Name Organization Date request received 12.
    [Show full text]